linux-next/lib/test_xarray.c

2328 lines
61 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+
/*
* test_xarray.c: Test the XArray API
* Copyright (c) 2017-2018 Microsoft Corporation
* Copyright (c) 2019-2020 Oracle
* Author: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
*/
xarray: port tests to kunit Minimally rewrite the XArray unit tests to use kunit. This integrates nicely with existing kunit tools which produce nicer human-readable output compared to the existing machinery. Running the xarray tests before this change requires an obscure invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ --kconfig_add CONFIG_TEST_XARRAY=y --raw_output=all nothing ``` which on failure produces ``` BUG at check_reserve:513 ... XArray: 6782340 of 6782364 tests passed ``` and exits 0. Running the xarray tests after this change requires a simpler invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ xarray ``` which on failure produces (colors omitted) ``` [09:50:53] ====================== check_reserve ====================== [09:50:53] [FAILED] param-0 [09:50:53] # check_reserve: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_xarray.c:536 [09:50:53] xa_erase(xa, 12345678) != NULL ... [09:50:53] # module: test_xarray [09:50:53] # xarray: pass:26 fail:3 skip:0 total:29 [09:50:53] # Totals: pass:28 fail:3 skip:0 total:31 [09:50:53] ===================== [FAILED] xarray ====================== ``` and exits 1. Use of richer kunit assertions is intentionally omitted to reduce the scope of the change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241205-xarray-kunit-port-v1-1-ee44bc7aa201@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com> Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-12-05 15:11:26 +00:00
#include <kunit/test.h>
xarray: port tests to kunit Minimally rewrite the XArray unit tests to use kunit. This integrates nicely with existing kunit tools which produce nicer human-readable output compared to the existing machinery. Running the xarray tests before this change requires an obscure invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ --kconfig_add CONFIG_TEST_XARRAY=y --raw_output=all nothing ``` which on failure produces ``` BUG at check_reserve:513 ... XArray: 6782340 of 6782364 tests passed ``` and exits 0. Running the xarray tests after this change requires a simpler invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ xarray ``` which on failure produces (colors omitted) ``` [09:50:53] ====================== check_reserve ====================== [09:50:53] [FAILED] param-0 [09:50:53] # check_reserve: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_xarray.c:536 [09:50:53] xa_erase(xa, 12345678) != NULL ... [09:50:53] # module: test_xarray [09:50:53] # xarray: pass:26 fail:3 skip:0 total:29 [09:50:53] # Totals: pass:28 fail:3 skip:0 total:31 [09:50:53] ===================== [FAILED] xarray ====================== ``` and exits 1. Use of richer kunit assertions is intentionally omitted to reduce the scope of the change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241205-xarray-kunit-port-v1-1-ee44bc7aa201@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com> Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-12-05 15:11:26 +00:00
#include <linux/module.h>
#include <linux/xarray.h>
static const unsigned int order_limit =
IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_XARRAY_MULTI) ? BITS_PER_LONG : 1;
#ifndef XA_DEBUG
# ifdef __KERNEL__
void xa_dump(const struct xarray *xa) { }
# endif
#undef XA_BUG_ON
xarray: port tests to kunit Minimally rewrite the XArray unit tests to use kunit. This integrates nicely with existing kunit tools which produce nicer human-readable output compared to the existing machinery. Running the xarray tests before this change requires an obscure invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ --kconfig_add CONFIG_TEST_XARRAY=y --raw_output=all nothing ``` which on failure produces ``` BUG at check_reserve:513 ... XArray: 6782340 of 6782364 tests passed ``` and exits 0. Running the xarray tests after this change requires a simpler invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ xarray ``` which on failure produces (colors omitted) ``` [09:50:53] ====================== check_reserve ====================== [09:50:53] [FAILED] param-0 [09:50:53] # check_reserve: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_xarray.c:536 [09:50:53] xa_erase(xa, 12345678) != NULL ... [09:50:53] # module: test_xarray [09:50:53] # xarray: pass:26 fail:3 skip:0 total:29 [09:50:53] # Totals: pass:28 fail:3 skip:0 total:31 [09:50:53] ===================== [FAILED] xarray ====================== ``` and exits 1. Use of richer kunit assertions is intentionally omitted to reduce the scope of the change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241205-xarray-kunit-port-v1-1-ee44bc7aa201@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com> Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-12-05 15:11:26 +00:00
#define XA_BUG_ON(xa, x) do { \
if (x) { \
KUNIT_FAIL(test, #x); \
xa_dump(xa); \
dump_stack(); \
} \
} while (0)
#endif
static void *xa_mk_index(unsigned long index)
{
return xa_mk_value(index & LONG_MAX);
}
static void *xa_store_index(struct xarray *xa, unsigned long index, gfp_t gfp)
{
return xa_store(xa, index, xa_mk_index(index), gfp);
}
xarray: port tests to kunit Minimally rewrite the XArray unit tests to use kunit. This integrates nicely with existing kunit tools which produce nicer human-readable output compared to the existing machinery. Running the xarray tests before this change requires an obscure invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ --kconfig_add CONFIG_TEST_XARRAY=y --raw_output=all nothing ``` which on failure produces ``` BUG at check_reserve:513 ... XArray: 6782340 of 6782364 tests passed ``` and exits 0. Running the xarray tests after this change requires a simpler invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ xarray ``` which on failure produces (colors omitted) ``` [09:50:53] ====================== check_reserve ====================== [09:50:53] [FAILED] param-0 [09:50:53] # check_reserve: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_xarray.c:536 [09:50:53] xa_erase(xa, 12345678) != NULL ... [09:50:53] # module: test_xarray [09:50:53] # xarray: pass:26 fail:3 skip:0 total:29 [09:50:53] # Totals: pass:28 fail:3 skip:0 total:31 [09:50:53] ===================== [FAILED] xarray ====================== ``` and exits 1. Use of richer kunit assertions is intentionally omitted to reduce the scope of the change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241205-xarray-kunit-port-v1-1-ee44bc7aa201@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com> Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-12-05 15:11:26 +00:00
static void xa_insert_index(struct kunit *test, struct xarray *xa, unsigned long index)
{
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_insert(xa, index, xa_mk_index(index),
GFP_KERNEL) != 0);
}
xarray: port tests to kunit Minimally rewrite the XArray unit tests to use kunit. This integrates nicely with existing kunit tools which produce nicer human-readable output compared to the existing machinery. Running the xarray tests before this change requires an obscure invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ --kconfig_add CONFIG_TEST_XARRAY=y --raw_output=all nothing ``` which on failure produces ``` BUG at check_reserve:513 ... XArray: 6782340 of 6782364 tests passed ``` and exits 0. Running the xarray tests after this change requires a simpler invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ xarray ``` which on failure produces (colors omitted) ``` [09:50:53] ====================== check_reserve ====================== [09:50:53] [FAILED] param-0 [09:50:53] # check_reserve: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_xarray.c:536 [09:50:53] xa_erase(xa, 12345678) != NULL ... [09:50:53] # module: test_xarray [09:50:53] # xarray: pass:26 fail:3 skip:0 total:29 [09:50:53] # Totals: pass:28 fail:3 skip:0 total:31 [09:50:53] ===================== [FAILED] xarray ====================== ``` and exits 1. Use of richer kunit assertions is intentionally omitted to reduce the scope of the change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241205-xarray-kunit-port-v1-1-ee44bc7aa201@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com> Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-12-05 15:11:26 +00:00
static void xa_alloc_index(struct kunit *test, struct xarray *xa, unsigned long index, gfp_t gfp)
{
u32 id;
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_alloc(xa, &id, xa_mk_index(index), xa_limit_32b,
gfp) != 0);
XA_BUG_ON(xa, id != index);
}
xarray: port tests to kunit Minimally rewrite the XArray unit tests to use kunit. This integrates nicely with existing kunit tools which produce nicer human-readable output compared to the existing machinery. Running the xarray tests before this change requires an obscure invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ --kconfig_add CONFIG_TEST_XARRAY=y --raw_output=all nothing ``` which on failure produces ``` BUG at check_reserve:513 ... XArray: 6782340 of 6782364 tests passed ``` and exits 0. Running the xarray tests after this change requires a simpler invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ xarray ``` which on failure produces (colors omitted) ``` [09:50:53] ====================== check_reserve ====================== [09:50:53] [FAILED] param-0 [09:50:53] # check_reserve: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_xarray.c:536 [09:50:53] xa_erase(xa, 12345678) != NULL ... [09:50:53] # module: test_xarray [09:50:53] # xarray: pass:26 fail:3 skip:0 total:29 [09:50:53] # Totals: pass:28 fail:3 skip:0 total:31 [09:50:53] ===================== [FAILED] xarray ====================== ``` and exits 1. Use of richer kunit assertions is intentionally omitted to reduce the scope of the change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241205-xarray-kunit-port-v1-1-ee44bc7aa201@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com> Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-12-05 15:11:26 +00:00
static void xa_erase_index(struct kunit *test, struct xarray *xa, unsigned long index)
{
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_erase(xa, index) != xa_mk_index(index));
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_load(xa, index) != NULL);
}
/*
* If anyone needs this, please move it to xarray.c. We have no current
* users outside the test suite because all current multislot users want
* to use the advanced API.
*/
static void *xa_store_order(struct xarray *xa, unsigned long index,
unsigned order, void *entry, gfp_t gfp)
{
XA_STATE_ORDER(xas, xa, index, order);
void *curr;
do {
xas_lock(&xas);
curr = xas_store(&xas, entry);
xas_unlock(&xas);
} while (xas_nomem(&xas, gfp));
return curr;
}
xarray: port tests to kunit Minimally rewrite the XArray unit tests to use kunit. This integrates nicely with existing kunit tools which produce nicer human-readable output compared to the existing machinery. Running the xarray tests before this change requires an obscure invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ --kconfig_add CONFIG_TEST_XARRAY=y --raw_output=all nothing ``` which on failure produces ``` BUG at check_reserve:513 ... XArray: 6782340 of 6782364 tests passed ``` and exits 0. Running the xarray tests after this change requires a simpler invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ xarray ``` which on failure produces (colors omitted) ``` [09:50:53] ====================== check_reserve ====================== [09:50:53] [FAILED] param-0 [09:50:53] # check_reserve: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_xarray.c:536 [09:50:53] xa_erase(xa, 12345678) != NULL ... [09:50:53] # module: test_xarray [09:50:53] # xarray: pass:26 fail:3 skip:0 total:29 [09:50:53] # Totals: pass:28 fail:3 skip:0 total:31 [09:50:53] ===================== [FAILED] xarray ====================== ``` and exits 1. Use of richer kunit assertions is intentionally omitted to reduce the scope of the change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241205-xarray-kunit-port-v1-1-ee44bc7aa201@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com> Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-12-05 15:11:26 +00:00
static inline struct xarray *xa_param(struct kunit *test)
{
xarray: port tests to kunit Minimally rewrite the XArray unit tests to use kunit. This integrates nicely with existing kunit tools which produce nicer human-readable output compared to the existing machinery. Running the xarray tests before this change requires an obscure invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ --kconfig_add CONFIG_TEST_XARRAY=y --raw_output=all nothing ``` which on failure produces ``` BUG at check_reserve:513 ... XArray: 6782340 of 6782364 tests passed ``` and exits 0. Running the xarray tests after this change requires a simpler invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ xarray ``` which on failure produces (colors omitted) ``` [09:50:53] ====================== check_reserve ====================== [09:50:53] [FAILED] param-0 [09:50:53] # check_reserve: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_xarray.c:536 [09:50:53] xa_erase(xa, 12345678) != NULL ... [09:50:53] # module: test_xarray [09:50:53] # xarray: pass:26 fail:3 skip:0 total:29 [09:50:53] # Totals: pass:28 fail:3 skip:0 total:31 [09:50:53] ===================== [FAILED] xarray ====================== ``` and exits 1. Use of richer kunit assertions is intentionally omitted to reduce the scope of the change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241205-xarray-kunit-port-v1-1-ee44bc7aa201@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com> Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-12-05 15:11:26 +00:00
return *(struct xarray **)test->param_value;
}
static noinline void check_xa_err(struct kunit *test)
{
struct xarray *xa = xa_param(test);
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_err(xa_store_index(xa, 0, GFP_NOWAIT)) != 0);
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_err(xa_erase(xa, 0)) != 0);
#ifndef __KERNEL__
/* The kernel does not fail GFP_NOWAIT allocations */
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_err(xa_store_index(xa, 1, GFP_NOWAIT)) != -ENOMEM);
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_err(xa_store_index(xa, 1, GFP_NOWAIT)) != -ENOMEM);
#endif
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_err(xa_store_index(xa, 1, GFP_KERNEL)) != 0);
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_err(xa_store(xa, 1, xa_mk_value(0), GFP_KERNEL)) != 0);
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_err(xa_erase(xa, 1)) != 0);
// kills the test-suite :-(
// XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_err(xa_store(xa, 0, xa_mk_internal(0), 0)) != -EINVAL);
}
xarray: port tests to kunit Minimally rewrite the XArray unit tests to use kunit. This integrates nicely with existing kunit tools which produce nicer human-readable output compared to the existing machinery. Running the xarray tests before this change requires an obscure invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ --kconfig_add CONFIG_TEST_XARRAY=y --raw_output=all nothing ``` which on failure produces ``` BUG at check_reserve:513 ... XArray: 6782340 of 6782364 tests passed ``` and exits 0. Running the xarray tests after this change requires a simpler invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ xarray ``` which on failure produces (colors omitted) ``` [09:50:53] ====================== check_reserve ====================== [09:50:53] [FAILED] param-0 [09:50:53] # check_reserve: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_xarray.c:536 [09:50:53] xa_erase(xa, 12345678) != NULL ... [09:50:53] # module: test_xarray [09:50:53] # xarray: pass:26 fail:3 skip:0 total:29 [09:50:53] # Totals: pass:28 fail:3 skip:0 total:31 [09:50:53] ===================== [FAILED] xarray ====================== ``` and exits 1. Use of richer kunit assertions is intentionally omitted to reduce the scope of the change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241205-xarray-kunit-port-v1-1-ee44bc7aa201@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com> Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-12-05 15:11:26 +00:00
static noinline void check_xas_retry(struct kunit *test)
{
xarray: port tests to kunit Minimally rewrite the XArray unit tests to use kunit. This integrates nicely with existing kunit tools which produce nicer human-readable output compared to the existing machinery. Running the xarray tests before this change requires an obscure invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ --kconfig_add CONFIG_TEST_XARRAY=y --raw_output=all nothing ``` which on failure produces ``` BUG at check_reserve:513 ... XArray: 6782340 of 6782364 tests passed ``` and exits 0. Running the xarray tests after this change requires a simpler invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ xarray ``` which on failure produces (colors omitted) ``` [09:50:53] ====================== check_reserve ====================== [09:50:53] [FAILED] param-0 [09:50:53] # check_reserve: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_xarray.c:536 [09:50:53] xa_erase(xa, 12345678) != NULL ... [09:50:53] # module: test_xarray [09:50:53] # xarray: pass:26 fail:3 skip:0 total:29 [09:50:53] # Totals: pass:28 fail:3 skip:0 total:31 [09:50:53] ===================== [FAILED] xarray ====================== ``` and exits 1. Use of richer kunit assertions is intentionally omitted to reduce the scope of the change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241205-xarray-kunit-port-v1-1-ee44bc7aa201@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com> Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-12-05 15:11:26 +00:00
struct xarray *xa = xa_param(test);
XA_STATE(xas, xa, 0);
void *entry;
xa_store_index(xa, 0, GFP_KERNEL);
xa_store_index(xa, 1, GFP_KERNEL);
rcu_read_lock();
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xas_find(&xas, ULONG_MAX) != xa_mk_value(0));
xarray: port tests to kunit Minimally rewrite the XArray unit tests to use kunit. This integrates nicely with existing kunit tools which produce nicer human-readable output compared to the existing machinery. Running the xarray tests before this change requires an obscure invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ --kconfig_add CONFIG_TEST_XARRAY=y --raw_output=all nothing ``` which on failure produces ``` BUG at check_reserve:513 ... XArray: 6782340 of 6782364 tests passed ``` and exits 0. Running the xarray tests after this change requires a simpler invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ xarray ``` which on failure produces (colors omitted) ``` [09:50:53] ====================== check_reserve ====================== [09:50:53] [FAILED] param-0 [09:50:53] # check_reserve: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_xarray.c:536 [09:50:53] xa_erase(xa, 12345678) != NULL ... [09:50:53] # module: test_xarray [09:50:53] # xarray: pass:26 fail:3 skip:0 total:29 [09:50:53] # Totals: pass:28 fail:3 skip:0 total:31 [09:50:53] ===================== [FAILED] xarray ====================== ``` and exits 1. Use of richer kunit assertions is intentionally omitted to reduce the scope of the change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241205-xarray-kunit-port-v1-1-ee44bc7aa201@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com> Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-12-05 15:11:26 +00:00
xa_erase_index(test, xa, 1);
XA_BUG_ON(xa, !xa_is_retry(xas_reload(&xas)));
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xas_retry(&xas, NULL));
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xas_retry(&xas, xa_mk_value(0)));
xas_reset(&xas);
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xas.xa_node != XAS_RESTART);
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xas_next_entry(&xas, ULONG_MAX) != xa_mk_value(0));
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xas.xa_node != NULL);
rcu_read_unlock();
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_store_index(xa, 1, GFP_KERNEL) != NULL);
rcu_read_lock();
XA_BUG_ON(xa, !xa_is_internal(xas_reload(&xas)));
xas.xa_node = XAS_RESTART;
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xas_next_entry(&xas, ULONG_MAX) != xa_mk_value(0));
rcu_read_unlock();
/* Make sure we can iterate through retry entries */
xas_lock(&xas);
xas_set(&xas, 0);
xas_store(&xas, XA_RETRY_ENTRY);
xas_set(&xas, 1);
xas_store(&xas, XA_RETRY_ENTRY);
xas_set(&xas, 0);
xas_for_each(&xas, entry, ULONG_MAX) {
xas_store(&xas, xa_mk_index(xas.xa_index));
}
xas_unlock(&xas);
xarray: port tests to kunit Minimally rewrite the XArray unit tests to use kunit. This integrates nicely with existing kunit tools which produce nicer human-readable output compared to the existing machinery. Running the xarray tests before this change requires an obscure invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ --kconfig_add CONFIG_TEST_XARRAY=y --raw_output=all nothing ``` which on failure produces ``` BUG at check_reserve:513 ... XArray: 6782340 of 6782364 tests passed ``` and exits 0. Running the xarray tests after this change requires a simpler invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ xarray ``` which on failure produces (colors omitted) ``` [09:50:53] ====================== check_reserve ====================== [09:50:53] [FAILED] param-0 [09:50:53] # check_reserve: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_xarray.c:536 [09:50:53] xa_erase(xa, 12345678) != NULL ... [09:50:53] # module: test_xarray [09:50:53] # xarray: pass:26 fail:3 skip:0 total:29 [09:50:53] # Totals: pass:28 fail:3 skip:0 total:31 [09:50:53] ===================== [FAILED] xarray ====================== ``` and exits 1. Use of richer kunit assertions is intentionally omitted to reduce the scope of the change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241205-xarray-kunit-port-v1-1-ee44bc7aa201@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com> Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-12-05 15:11:26 +00:00
xa_erase_index(test, xa, 0);
xa_erase_index(test, xa, 1);
}
xarray: port tests to kunit Minimally rewrite the XArray unit tests to use kunit. This integrates nicely with existing kunit tools which produce nicer human-readable output compared to the existing machinery. Running the xarray tests before this change requires an obscure invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ --kconfig_add CONFIG_TEST_XARRAY=y --raw_output=all nothing ``` which on failure produces ``` BUG at check_reserve:513 ... XArray: 6782340 of 6782364 tests passed ``` and exits 0. Running the xarray tests after this change requires a simpler invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ xarray ``` which on failure produces (colors omitted) ``` [09:50:53] ====================== check_reserve ====================== [09:50:53] [FAILED] param-0 [09:50:53] # check_reserve: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_xarray.c:536 [09:50:53] xa_erase(xa, 12345678) != NULL ... [09:50:53] # module: test_xarray [09:50:53] # xarray: pass:26 fail:3 skip:0 total:29 [09:50:53] # Totals: pass:28 fail:3 skip:0 total:31 [09:50:53] ===================== [FAILED] xarray ====================== ``` and exits 1. Use of richer kunit assertions is intentionally omitted to reduce the scope of the change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241205-xarray-kunit-port-v1-1-ee44bc7aa201@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com> Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-12-05 15:11:26 +00:00
static noinline void check_xa_load(struct kunit *test)
{
xarray: port tests to kunit Minimally rewrite the XArray unit tests to use kunit. This integrates nicely with existing kunit tools which produce nicer human-readable output compared to the existing machinery. Running the xarray tests before this change requires an obscure invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ --kconfig_add CONFIG_TEST_XARRAY=y --raw_output=all nothing ``` which on failure produces ``` BUG at check_reserve:513 ... XArray: 6782340 of 6782364 tests passed ``` and exits 0. Running the xarray tests after this change requires a simpler invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ xarray ``` which on failure produces (colors omitted) ``` [09:50:53] ====================== check_reserve ====================== [09:50:53] [FAILED] param-0 [09:50:53] # check_reserve: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_xarray.c:536 [09:50:53] xa_erase(xa, 12345678) != NULL ... [09:50:53] # module: test_xarray [09:50:53] # xarray: pass:26 fail:3 skip:0 total:29 [09:50:53] # Totals: pass:28 fail:3 skip:0 total:31 [09:50:53] ===================== [FAILED] xarray ====================== ``` and exits 1. Use of richer kunit assertions is intentionally omitted to reduce the scope of the change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241205-xarray-kunit-port-v1-1-ee44bc7aa201@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com> Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-12-05 15:11:26 +00:00
struct xarray *xa = xa_param(test);
unsigned long i, j;
for (i = 0; i < 1024; i++) {
for (j = 0; j < 1024; j++) {
void *entry = xa_load(xa, j);
if (j < i)
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_to_value(entry) != j);
else
XA_BUG_ON(xa, entry);
}
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_store_index(xa, i, GFP_KERNEL) != NULL);
}
for (i = 0; i < 1024; i++) {
for (j = 0; j < 1024; j++) {
void *entry = xa_load(xa, j);
if (j >= i)
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_to_value(entry) != j);
else
XA_BUG_ON(xa, entry);
}
xarray: port tests to kunit Minimally rewrite the XArray unit tests to use kunit. This integrates nicely with existing kunit tools which produce nicer human-readable output compared to the existing machinery. Running the xarray tests before this change requires an obscure invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ --kconfig_add CONFIG_TEST_XARRAY=y --raw_output=all nothing ``` which on failure produces ``` BUG at check_reserve:513 ... XArray: 6782340 of 6782364 tests passed ``` and exits 0. Running the xarray tests after this change requires a simpler invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ xarray ``` which on failure produces (colors omitted) ``` [09:50:53] ====================== check_reserve ====================== [09:50:53] [FAILED] param-0 [09:50:53] # check_reserve: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_xarray.c:536 [09:50:53] xa_erase(xa, 12345678) != NULL ... [09:50:53] # module: test_xarray [09:50:53] # xarray: pass:26 fail:3 skip:0 total:29 [09:50:53] # Totals: pass:28 fail:3 skip:0 total:31 [09:50:53] ===================== [FAILED] xarray ====================== ``` and exits 1. Use of richer kunit assertions is intentionally omitted to reduce the scope of the change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241205-xarray-kunit-port-v1-1-ee44bc7aa201@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com> Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-12-05 15:11:26 +00:00
xa_erase_index(test, xa, i);
}
XA_BUG_ON(xa, !xa_empty(xa));
}
xarray: port tests to kunit Minimally rewrite the XArray unit tests to use kunit. This integrates nicely with existing kunit tools which produce nicer human-readable output compared to the existing machinery. Running the xarray tests before this change requires an obscure invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ --kconfig_add CONFIG_TEST_XARRAY=y --raw_output=all nothing ``` which on failure produces ``` BUG at check_reserve:513 ... XArray: 6782340 of 6782364 tests passed ``` and exits 0. Running the xarray tests after this change requires a simpler invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ xarray ``` which on failure produces (colors omitted) ``` [09:50:53] ====================== check_reserve ====================== [09:50:53] [FAILED] param-0 [09:50:53] # check_reserve: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_xarray.c:536 [09:50:53] xa_erase(xa, 12345678) != NULL ... [09:50:53] # module: test_xarray [09:50:53] # xarray: pass:26 fail:3 skip:0 total:29 [09:50:53] # Totals: pass:28 fail:3 skip:0 total:31 [09:50:53] ===================== [FAILED] xarray ====================== ``` and exits 1. Use of richer kunit assertions is intentionally omitted to reduce the scope of the change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241205-xarray-kunit-port-v1-1-ee44bc7aa201@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com> Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-12-05 15:11:26 +00:00
static noinline void check_xa_mark_1(struct kunit *test, unsigned long index)
{
xarray: port tests to kunit Minimally rewrite the XArray unit tests to use kunit. This integrates nicely with existing kunit tools which produce nicer human-readable output compared to the existing machinery. Running the xarray tests before this change requires an obscure invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ --kconfig_add CONFIG_TEST_XARRAY=y --raw_output=all nothing ``` which on failure produces ``` BUG at check_reserve:513 ... XArray: 6782340 of 6782364 tests passed ``` and exits 0. Running the xarray tests after this change requires a simpler invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ xarray ``` which on failure produces (colors omitted) ``` [09:50:53] ====================== check_reserve ====================== [09:50:53] [FAILED] param-0 [09:50:53] # check_reserve: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_xarray.c:536 [09:50:53] xa_erase(xa, 12345678) != NULL ... [09:50:53] # module: test_xarray [09:50:53] # xarray: pass:26 fail:3 skip:0 total:29 [09:50:53] # Totals: pass:28 fail:3 skip:0 total:31 [09:50:53] ===================== [FAILED] xarray ====================== ``` and exits 1. Use of richer kunit assertions is intentionally omitted to reduce the scope of the change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241205-xarray-kunit-port-v1-1-ee44bc7aa201@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com> Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-12-05 15:11:26 +00:00
struct xarray *xa = xa_param(test);
unsigned int order;
unsigned int max_order = IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_XARRAY_MULTI) ? 8 : 1;
/* NULL elements have no marks set */
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_get_mark(xa, index, XA_MARK_0));
xa_set_mark(xa, index, XA_MARK_0);
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_get_mark(xa, index, XA_MARK_0));
/* Storing a pointer will not make a mark appear */
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_store_index(xa, index, GFP_KERNEL) != NULL);
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_get_mark(xa, index, XA_MARK_0));
xa_set_mark(xa, index, XA_MARK_0);
XA_BUG_ON(xa, !xa_get_mark(xa, index, XA_MARK_0));
/* Setting one mark will not set another mark */
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_get_mark(xa, index + 1, XA_MARK_0));
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_get_mark(xa, index, XA_MARK_1));
/* Storing NULL clears marks, and they can't be set again */
xarray: port tests to kunit Minimally rewrite the XArray unit tests to use kunit. This integrates nicely with existing kunit tools which produce nicer human-readable output compared to the existing machinery. Running the xarray tests before this change requires an obscure invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ --kconfig_add CONFIG_TEST_XARRAY=y --raw_output=all nothing ``` which on failure produces ``` BUG at check_reserve:513 ... XArray: 6782340 of 6782364 tests passed ``` and exits 0. Running the xarray tests after this change requires a simpler invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ xarray ``` which on failure produces (colors omitted) ``` [09:50:53] ====================== check_reserve ====================== [09:50:53] [FAILED] param-0 [09:50:53] # check_reserve: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_xarray.c:536 [09:50:53] xa_erase(xa, 12345678) != NULL ... [09:50:53] # module: test_xarray [09:50:53] # xarray: pass:26 fail:3 skip:0 total:29 [09:50:53] # Totals: pass:28 fail:3 skip:0 total:31 [09:50:53] ===================== [FAILED] xarray ====================== ``` and exits 1. Use of richer kunit assertions is intentionally omitted to reduce the scope of the change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241205-xarray-kunit-port-v1-1-ee44bc7aa201@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com> Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-12-05 15:11:26 +00:00
xa_erase_index(test, xa, index);
XA_BUG_ON(xa, !xa_empty(xa));
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_get_mark(xa, index, XA_MARK_0));
xa_set_mark(xa, index, XA_MARK_0);
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_get_mark(xa, index, XA_MARK_0));
/*
* Storing a multi-index entry over entries with marks gives the
* entire entry the union of the marks
*/
BUG_ON((index % 4) != 0);
for (order = 2; order < max_order; order++) {
unsigned long base = round_down(index, 1UL << order);
unsigned long next = base + (1UL << order);
unsigned long i;
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_store_index(xa, index + 1, GFP_KERNEL));
xa_set_mark(xa, index + 1, XA_MARK_0);
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_store_index(xa, index + 2, GFP_KERNEL));
xa_set_mark(xa, index + 2, XA_MARK_2);
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_store_index(xa, next, GFP_KERNEL));
xa_store_order(xa, index, order, xa_mk_index(index),
GFP_KERNEL);
for (i = base; i < next; i++) {
XA_STATE(xas, xa, i);
unsigned int seen = 0;
void *entry;
XA_BUG_ON(xa, !xa_get_mark(xa, i, XA_MARK_0));
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_get_mark(xa, i, XA_MARK_1));
XA_BUG_ON(xa, !xa_get_mark(xa, i, XA_MARK_2));
/* We should see two elements in the array */
rcu_read_lock();
xas_for_each(&xas, entry, ULONG_MAX)
seen++;
rcu_read_unlock();
XA_BUG_ON(xa, seen != 2);
/* One of which is marked */
xas_set(&xas, 0);
seen = 0;
rcu_read_lock();
xas_for_each_marked(&xas, entry, ULONG_MAX, XA_MARK_0)
seen++;
rcu_read_unlock();
XA_BUG_ON(xa, seen != 1);
}
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_get_mark(xa, next, XA_MARK_0));
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_get_mark(xa, next, XA_MARK_1));
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_get_mark(xa, next, XA_MARK_2));
xarray: port tests to kunit Minimally rewrite the XArray unit tests to use kunit. This integrates nicely with existing kunit tools which produce nicer human-readable output compared to the existing machinery. Running the xarray tests before this change requires an obscure invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ --kconfig_add CONFIG_TEST_XARRAY=y --raw_output=all nothing ``` which on failure produces ``` BUG at check_reserve:513 ... XArray: 6782340 of 6782364 tests passed ``` and exits 0. Running the xarray tests after this change requires a simpler invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ xarray ``` which on failure produces (colors omitted) ``` [09:50:53] ====================== check_reserve ====================== [09:50:53] [FAILED] param-0 [09:50:53] # check_reserve: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_xarray.c:536 [09:50:53] xa_erase(xa, 12345678) != NULL ... [09:50:53] # module: test_xarray [09:50:53] # xarray: pass:26 fail:3 skip:0 total:29 [09:50:53] # Totals: pass:28 fail:3 skip:0 total:31 [09:50:53] ===================== [FAILED] xarray ====================== ``` and exits 1. Use of richer kunit assertions is intentionally omitted to reduce the scope of the change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241205-xarray-kunit-port-v1-1-ee44bc7aa201@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com> Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-12-05 15:11:26 +00:00
xa_erase_index(test, xa, index);
xa_erase_index(test, xa, next);
XA_BUG_ON(xa, !xa_empty(xa));
}
XA_BUG_ON(xa, !xa_empty(xa));
}
xarray: port tests to kunit Minimally rewrite the XArray unit tests to use kunit. This integrates nicely with existing kunit tools which produce nicer human-readable output compared to the existing machinery. Running the xarray tests before this change requires an obscure invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ --kconfig_add CONFIG_TEST_XARRAY=y --raw_output=all nothing ``` which on failure produces ``` BUG at check_reserve:513 ... XArray: 6782340 of 6782364 tests passed ``` and exits 0. Running the xarray tests after this change requires a simpler invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ xarray ``` which on failure produces (colors omitted) ``` [09:50:53] ====================== check_reserve ====================== [09:50:53] [FAILED] param-0 [09:50:53] # check_reserve: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_xarray.c:536 [09:50:53] xa_erase(xa, 12345678) != NULL ... [09:50:53] # module: test_xarray [09:50:53] # xarray: pass:26 fail:3 skip:0 total:29 [09:50:53] # Totals: pass:28 fail:3 skip:0 total:31 [09:50:53] ===================== [FAILED] xarray ====================== ``` and exits 1. Use of richer kunit assertions is intentionally omitted to reduce the scope of the change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241205-xarray-kunit-port-v1-1-ee44bc7aa201@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com> Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-12-05 15:11:26 +00:00
static noinline void check_xa_mark_2(struct kunit *test)
{
xarray: port tests to kunit Minimally rewrite the XArray unit tests to use kunit. This integrates nicely with existing kunit tools which produce nicer human-readable output compared to the existing machinery. Running the xarray tests before this change requires an obscure invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ --kconfig_add CONFIG_TEST_XARRAY=y --raw_output=all nothing ``` which on failure produces ``` BUG at check_reserve:513 ... XArray: 6782340 of 6782364 tests passed ``` and exits 0. Running the xarray tests after this change requires a simpler invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ xarray ``` which on failure produces (colors omitted) ``` [09:50:53] ====================== check_reserve ====================== [09:50:53] [FAILED] param-0 [09:50:53] # check_reserve: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_xarray.c:536 [09:50:53] xa_erase(xa, 12345678) != NULL ... [09:50:53] # module: test_xarray [09:50:53] # xarray: pass:26 fail:3 skip:0 total:29 [09:50:53] # Totals: pass:28 fail:3 skip:0 total:31 [09:50:53] ===================== [FAILED] xarray ====================== ``` and exits 1. Use of richer kunit assertions is intentionally omitted to reduce the scope of the change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241205-xarray-kunit-port-v1-1-ee44bc7aa201@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com> Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-12-05 15:11:26 +00:00
struct xarray *xa = xa_param(test);
XA_STATE(xas, xa, 0);
unsigned long index;
unsigned int count = 0;
void *entry;
xa_store_index(xa, 0, GFP_KERNEL);
xa_set_mark(xa, 0, XA_MARK_0);
xas_lock(&xas);
xas_load(&xas);
xas_init_marks(&xas);
xas_unlock(&xas);
XA_BUG_ON(xa, !xa_get_mark(xa, 0, XA_MARK_0) == 0);
for (index = 3500; index < 4500; index++) {
xa_store_index(xa, index, GFP_KERNEL);
xa_set_mark(xa, index, XA_MARK_0);
}
xas_reset(&xas);
rcu_read_lock();
xas_for_each_marked(&xas, entry, ULONG_MAX, XA_MARK_0)
count++;
rcu_read_unlock();
XA_BUG_ON(xa, count != 1000);
xas_lock(&xas);
xas_for_each(&xas, entry, ULONG_MAX) {
xas_init_marks(&xas);
XA_BUG_ON(xa, !xa_get_mark(xa, xas.xa_index, XA_MARK_0));
XA_BUG_ON(xa, !xas_get_mark(&xas, XA_MARK_0));
}
xas_unlock(&xas);
xa_destroy(xa);
}
xarray: port tests to kunit Minimally rewrite the XArray unit tests to use kunit. This integrates nicely with existing kunit tools which produce nicer human-readable output compared to the existing machinery. Running the xarray tests before this change requires an obscure invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ --kconfig_add CONFIG_TEST_XARRAY=y --raw_output=all nothing ``` which on failure produces ``` BUG at check_reserve:513 ... XArray: 6782340 of 6782364 tests passed ``` and exits 0. Running the xarray tests after this change requires a simpler invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ xarray ``` which on failure produces (colors omitted) ``` [09:50:53] ====================== check_reserve ====================== [09:50:53] [FAILED] param-0 [09:50:53] # check_reserve: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_xarray.c:536 [09:50:53] xa_erase(xa, 12345678) != NULL ... [09:50:53] # module: test_xarray [09:50:53] # xarray: pass:26 fail:3 skip:0 total:29 [09:50:53] # Totals: pass:28 fail:3 skip:0 total:31 [09:50:53] ===================== [FAILED] xarray ====================== ``` and exits 1. Use of richer kunit assertions is intentionally omitted to reduce the scope of the change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241205-xarray-kunit-port-v1-1-ee44bc7aa201@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com> Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-12-05 15:11:26 +00:00
static noinline void check_xa_mark_3(struct kunit *test)
{
#ifdef CONFIG_XARRAY_MULTI
xarray: port tests to kunit Minimally rewrite the XArray unit tests to use kunit. This integrates nicely with existing kunit tools which produce nicer human-readable output compared to the existing machinery. Running the xarray tests before this change requires an obscure invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ --kconfig_add CONFIG_TEST_XARRAY=y --raw_output=all nothing ``` which on failure produces ``` BUG at check_reserve:513 ... XArray: 6782340 of 6782364 tests passed ``` and exits 0. Running the xarray tests after this change requires a simpler invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ xarray ``` which on failure produces (colors omitted) ``` [09:50:53] ====================== check_reserve ====================== [09:50:53] [FAILED] param-0 [09:50:53] # check_reserve: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_xarray.c:536 [09:50:53] xa_erase(xa, 12345678) != NULL ... [09:50:53] # module: test_xarray [09:50:53] # xarray: pass:26 fail:3 skip:0 total:29 [09:50:53] # Totals: pass:28 fail:3 skip:0 total:31 [09:50:53] ===================== [FAILED] xarray ====================== ``` and exits 1. Use of richer kunit assertions is intentionally omitted to reduce the scope of the change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241205-xarray-kunit-port-v1-1-ee44bc7aa201@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com> Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-12-05 15:11:26 +00:00
struct xarray *xa = xa_param(test);
XA_STATE(xas, xa, 0x41);
void *entry;
int count = 0;
xa_store_order(xa, 0x40, 2, xa_mk_index(0x40), GFP_KERNEL);
xa_set_mark(xa, 0x41, XA_MARK_0);
rcu_read_lock();
xas_for_each_marked(&xas, entry, ULONG_MAX, XA_MARK_0) {
count++;
XA_BUG_ON(xa, entry != xa_mk_index(0x40));
}
XA_BUG_ON(xa, count != 1);
rcu_read_unlock();
xa_destroy(xa);
#endif
}
xarray: port tests to kunit Minimally rewrite the XArray unit tests to use kunit. This integrates nicely with existing kunit tools which produce nicer human-readable output compared to the existing machinery. Running the xarray tests before this change requires an obscure invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ --kconfig_add CONFIG_TEST_XARRAY=y --raw_output=all nothing ``` which on failure produces ``` BUG at check_reserve:513 ... XArray: 6782340 of 6782364 tests passed ``` and exits 0. Running the xarray tests after this change requires a simpler invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ xarray ``` which on failure produces (colors omitted) ``` [09:50:53] ====================== check_reserve ====================== [09:50:53] [FAILED] param-0 [09:50:53] # check_reserve: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_xarray.c:536 [09:50:53] xa_erase(xa, 12345678) != NULL ... [09:50:53] # module: test_xarray [09:50:53] # xarray: pass:26 fail:3 skip:0 total:29 [09:50:53] # Totals: pass:28 fail:3 skip:0 total:31 [09:50:53] ===================== [FAILED] xarray ====================== ``` and exits 1. Use of richer kunit assertions is intentionally omitted to reduce the scope of the change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241205-xarray-kunit-port-v1-1-ee44bc7aa201@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com> Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-12-05 15:11:26 +00:00
static noinline void check_xa_mark(struct kunit *test)
{
unsigned long index;
for (index = 0; index < 16384; index += 4)
xarray: port tests to kunit Minimally rewrite the XArray unit tests to use kunit. This integrates nicely with existing kunit tools which produce nicer human-readable output compared to the existing machinery. Running the xarray tests before this change requires an obscure invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ --kconfig_add CONFIG_TEST_XARRAY=y --raw_output=all nothing ``` which on failure produces ``` BUG at check_reserve:513 ... XArray: 6782340 of 6782364 tests passed ``` and exits 0. Running the xarray tests after this change requires a simpler invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ xarray ``` which on failure produces (colors omitted) ``` [09:50:53] ====================== check_reserve ====================== [09:50:53] [FAILED] param-0 [09:50:53] # check_reserve: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_xarray.c:536 [09:50:53] xa_erase(xa, 12345678) != NULL ... [09:50:53] # module: test_xarray [09:50:53] # xarray: pass:26 fail:3 skip:0 total:29 [09:50:53] # Totals: pass:28 fail:3 skip:0 total:31 [09:50:53] ===================== [FAILED] xarray ====================== ``` and exits 1. Use of richer kunit assertions is intentionally omitted to reduce the scope of the change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241205-xarray-kunit-port-v1-1-ee44bc7aa201@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com> Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-12-05 15:11:26 +00:00
check_xa_mark_1(test, index);
xarray: port tests to kunit Minimally rewrite the XArray unit tests to use kunit. This integrates nicely with existing kunit tools which produce nicer human-readable output compared to the existing machinery. Running the xarray tests before this change requires an obscure invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ --kconfig_add CONFIG_TEST_XARRAY=y --raw_output=all nothing ``` which on failure produces ``` BUG at check_reserve:513 ... XArray: 6782340 of 6782364 tests passed ``` and exits 0. Running the xarray tests after this change requires a simpler invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ xarray ``` which on failure produces (colors omitted) ``` [09:50:53] ====================== check_reserve ====================== [09:50:53] [FAILED] param-0 [09:50:53] # check_reserve: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_xarray.c:536 [09:50:53] xa_erase(xa, 12345678) != NULL ... [09:50:53] # module: test_xarray [09:50:53] # xarray: pass:26 fail:3 skip:0 total:29 [09:50:53] # Totals: pass:28 fail:3 skip:0 total:31 [09:50:53] ===================== [FAILED] xarray ====================== ``` and exits 1. Use of richer kunit assertions is intentionally omitted to reduce the scope of the change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241205-xarray-kunit-port-v1-1-ee44bc7aa201@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com> Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-12-05 15:11:26 +00:00
check_xa_mark_2(test);
check_xa_mark_3(test);
}
xarray: port tests to kunit Minimally rewrite the XArray unit tests to use kunit. This integrates nicely with existing kunit tools which produce nicer human-readable output compared to the existing machinery. Running the xarray tests before this change requires an obscure invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ --kconfig_add CONFIG_TEST_XARRAY=y --raw_output=all nothing ``` which on failure produces ``` BUG at check_reserve:513 ... XArray: 6782340 of 6782364 tests passed ``` and exits 0. Running the xarray tests after this change requires a simpler invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ xarray ``` which on failure produces (colors omitted) ``` [09:50:53] ====================== check_reserve ====================== [09:50:53] [FAILED] param-0 [09:50:53] # check_reserve: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_xarray.c:536 [09:50:53] xa_erase(xa, 12345678) != NULL ... [09:50:53] # module: test_xarray [09:50:53] # xarray: pass:26 fail:3 skip:0 total:29 [09:50:53] # Totals: pass:28 fail:3 skip:0 total:31 [09:50:53] ===================== [FAILED] xarray ====================== ``` and exits 1. Use of richer kunit assertions is intentionally omitted to reduce the scope of the change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241205-xarray-kunit-port-v1-1-ee44bc7aa201@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com> Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-12-05 15:11:26 +00:00
static noinline void check_xa_shrink(struct kunit *test)
{
xarray: port tests to kunit Minimally rewrite the XArray unit tests to use kunit. This integrates nicely with existing kunit tools which produce nicer human-readable output compared to the existing machinery. Running the xarray tests before this change requires an obscure invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ --kconfig_add CONFIG_TEST_XARRAY=y --raw_output=all nothing ``` which on failure produces ``` BUG at check_reserve:513 ... XArray: 6782340 of 6782364 tests passed ``` and exits 0. Running the xarray tests after this change requires a simpler invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ xarray ``` which on failure produces (colors omitted) ``` [09:50:53] ====================== check_reserve ====================== [09:50:53] [FAILED] param-0 [09:50:53] # check_reserve: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_xarray.c:536 [09:50:53] xa_erase(xa, 12345678) != NULL ... [09:50:53] # module: test_xarray [09:50:53] # xarray: pass:26 fail:3 skip:0 total:29 [09:50:53] # Totals: pass:28 fail:3 skip:0 total:31 [09:50:53] ===================== [FAILED] xarray ====================== ``` and exits 1. Use of richer kunit assertions is intentionally omitted to reduce the scope of the change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241205-xarray-kunit-port-v1-1-ee44bc7aa201@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com> Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-12-05 15:11:26 +00:00
struct xarray *xa = xa_param(test);
XA_STATE(xas, xa, 1);
struct xa_node *node;
unsigned int order;
unsigned int max_order = IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_XARRAY_MULTI) ? 15 : 1;
XA_BUG_ON(xa, !xa_empty(xa));
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_store_index(xa, 0, GFP_KERNEL) != NULL);
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_store_index(xa, 1, GFP_KERNEL) != NULL);
/*
* Check that erasing the entry at 1 shrinks the tree and properly
* marks the node as being deleted.
*/
xas_lock(&xas);
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xas_load(&xas) != xa_mk_value(1));
node = xas.xa_node;
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_entry_locked(xa, node, 0) != xa_mk_value(0));
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xas_store(&xas, NULL) != xa_mk_value(1));
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_load(xa, 1) != NULL);
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xas.xa_node != XAS_BOUNDS);
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_entry_locked(xa, node, 0) != XA_RETRY_ENTRY);
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xas_load(&xas) != NULL);
xas_unlock(&xas);
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_load(xa, 0) != xa_mk_value(0));
xarray: port tests to kunit Minimally rewrite the XArray unit tests to use kunit. This integrates nicely with existing kunit tools which produce nicer human-readable output compared to the existing machinery. Running the xarray tests before this change requires an obscure invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ --kconfig_add CONFIG_TEST_XARRAY=y --raw_output=all nothing ``` which on failure produces ``` BUG at check_reserve:513 ... XArray: 6782340 of 6782364 tests passed ``` and exits 0. Running the xarray tests after this change requires a simpler invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ xarray ``` which on failure produces (colors omitted) ``` [09:50:53] ====================== check_reserve ====================== [09:50:53] [FAILED] param-0 [09:50:53] # check_reserve: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_xarray.c:536 [09:50:53] xa_erase(xa, 12345678) != NULL ... [09:50:53] # module: test_xarray [09:50:53] # xarray: pass:26 fail:3 skip:0 total:29 [09:50:53] # Totals: pass:28 fail:3 skip:0 total:31 [09:50:53] ===================== [FAILED] xarray ====================== ``` and exits 1. Use of richer kunit assertions is intentionally omitted to reduce the scope of the change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241205-xarray-kunit-port-v1-1-ee44bc7aa201@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com> Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-12-05 15:11:26 +00:00
xa_erase_index(test, xa, 0);
XA_BUG_ON(xa, !xa_empty(xa));
for (order = 0; order < max_order; order++) {
unsigned long max = (1UL << order) - 1;
xa_store_order(xa, 0, order, xa_mk_value(0), GFP_KERNEL);
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_load(xa, max) != xa_mk_value(0));
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_load(xa, max + 1) != NULL);
rcu_read_lock();
node = xa_head(xa);
rcu_read_unlock();
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_store_index(xa, ULONG_MAX, GFP_KERNEL) !=
NULL);
rcu_read_lock();
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_head(xa) == node);
rcu_read_unlock();
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_load(xa, max + 1) != NULL);
xarray: port tests to kunit Minimally rewrite the XArray unit tests to use kunit. This integrates nicely with existing kunit tools which produce nicer human-readable output compared to the existing machinery. Running the xarray tests before this change requires an obscure invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ --kconfig_add CONFIG_TEST_XARRAY=y --raw_output=all nothing ``` which on failure produces ``` BUG at check_reserve:513 ... XArray: 6782340 of 6782364 tests passed ``` and exits 0. Running the xarray tests after this change requires a simpler invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ xarray ``` which on failure produces (colors omitted) ``` [09:50:53] ====================== check_reserve ====================== [09:50:53] [FAILED] param-0 [09:50:53] # check_reserve: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_xarray.c:536 [09:50:53] xa_erase(xa, 12345678) != NULL ... [09:50:53] # module: test_xarray [09:50:53] # xarray: pass:26 fail:3 skip:0 total:29 [09:50:53] # Totals: pass:28 fail:3 skip:0 total:31 [09:50:53] ===================== [FAILED] xarray ====================== ``` and exits 1. Use of richer kunit assertions is intentionally omitted to reduce the scope of the change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241205-xarray-kunit-port-v1-1-ee44bc7aa201@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com> Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-12-05 15:11:26 +00:00
xa_erase_index(test, xa, ULONG_MAX);
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa->xa_head != node);
xarray: port tests to kunit Minimally rewrite the XArray unit tests to use kunit. This integrates nicely with existing kunit tools which produce nicer human-readable output compared to the existing machinery. Running the xarray tests before this change requires an obscure invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ --kconfig_add CONFIG_TEST_XARRAY=y --raw_output=all nothing ``` which on failure produces ``` BUG at check_reserve:513 ... XArray: 6782340 of 6782364 tests passed ``` and exits 0. Running the xarray tests after this change requires a simpler invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ xarray ``` which on failure produces (colors omitted) ``` [09:50:53] ====================== check_reserve ====================== [09:50:53] [FAILED] param-0 [09:50:53] # check_reserve: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_xarray.c:536 [09:50:53] xa_erase(xa, 12345678) != NULL ... [09:50:53] # module: test_xarray [09:50:53] # xarray: pass:26 fail:3 skip:0 total:29 [09:50:53] # Totals: pass:28 fail:3 skip:0 total:31 [09:50:53] ===================== [FAILED] xarray ====================== ``` and exits 1. Use of richer kunit assertions is intentionally omitted to reduce the scope of the change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241205-xarray-kunit-port-v1-1-ee44bc7aa201@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com> Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-12-05 15:11:26 +00:00
xa_erase_index(test, xa, 0);
}
}
xarray: port tests to kunit Minimally rewrite the XArray unit tests to use kunit. This integrates nicely with existing kunit tools which produce nicer human-readable output compared to the existing machinery. Running the xarray tests before this change requires an obscure invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ --kconfig_add CONFIG_TEST_XARRAY=y --raw_output=all nothing ``` which on failure produces ``` BUG at check_reserve:513 ... XArray: 6782340 of 6782364 tests passed ``` and exits 0. Running the xarray tests after this change requires a simpler invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ xarray ``` which on failure produces (colors omitted) ``` [09:50:53] ====================== check_reserve ====================== [09:50:53] [FAILED] param-0 [09:50:53] # check_reserve: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_xarray.c:536 [09:50:53] xa_erase(xa, 12345678) != NULL ... [09:50:53] # module: test_xarray [09:50:53] # xarray: pass:26 fail:3 skip:0 total:29 [09:50:53] # Totals: pass:28 fail:3 skip:0 total:31 [09:50:53] ===================== [FAILED] xarray ====================== ``` and exits 1. Use of richer kunit assertions is intentionally omitted to reduce the scope of the change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241205-xarray-kunit-port-v1-1-ee44bc7aa201@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com> Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-12-05 15:11:26 +00:00
static noinline void check_insert(struct kunit *test)
{
xarray: port tests to kunit Minimally rewrite the XArray unit tests to use kunit. This integrates nicely with existing kunit tools which produce nicer human-readable output compared to the existing machinery. Running the xarray tests before this change requires an obscure invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ --kconfig_add CONFIG_TEST_XARRAY=y --raw_output=all nothing ``` which on failure produces ``` BUG at check_reserve:513 ... XArray: 6782340 of 6782364 tests passed ``` and exits 0. Running the xarray tests after this change requires a simpler invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ xarray ``` which on failure produces (colors omitted) ``` [09:50:53] ====================== check_reserve ====================== [09:50:53] [FAILED] param-0 [09:50:53] # check_reserve: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_xarray.c:536 [09:50:53] xa_erase(xa, 12345678) != NULL ... [09:50:53] # module: test_xarray [09:50:53] # xarray: pass:26 fail:3 skip:0 total:29 [09:50:53] # Totals: pass:28 fail:3 skip:0 total:31 [09:50:53] ===================== [FAILED] xarray ====================== ``` and exits 1. Use of richer kunit assertions is intentionally omitted to reduce the scope of the change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241205-xarray-kunit-port-v1-1-ee44bc7aa201@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com> Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-12-05 15:11:26 +00:00
struct xarray *xa = xa_param(test);
unsigned long i;
for (i = 0; i < 1024; i++) {
xarray: port tests to kunit Minimally rewrite the XArray unit tests to use kunit. This integrates nicely with existing kunit tools which produce nicer human-readable output compared to the existing machinery. Running the xarray tests before this change requires an obscure invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ --kconfig_add CONFIG_TEST_XARRAY=y --raw_output=all nothing ``` which on failure produces ``` BUG at check_reserve:513 ... XArray: 6782340 of 6782364 tests passed ``` and exits 0. Running the xarray tests after this change requires a simpler invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ xarray ``` which on failure produces (colors omitted) ``` [09:50:53] ====================== check_reserve ====================== [09:50:53] [FAILED] param-0 [09:50:53] # check_reserve: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_xarray.c:536 [09:50:53] xa_erase(xa, 12345678) != NULL ... [09:50:53] # module: test_xarray [09:50:53] # xarray: pass:26 fail:3 skip:0 total:29 [09:50:53] # Totals: pass:28 fail:3 skip:0 total:31 [09:50:53] ===================== [FAILED] xarray ====================== ``` and exits 1. Use of richer kunit assertions is intentionally omitted to reduce the scope of the change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241205-xarray-kunit-port-v1-1-ee44bc7aa201@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com> Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-12-05 15:11:26 +00:00
xa_insert_index(test, xa, i);
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_load(xa, i - 1) != NULL);
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_load(xa, i + 1) != NULL);
xarray: port tests to kunit Minimally rewrite the XArray unit tests to use kunit. This integrates nicely with existing kunit tools which produce nicer human-readable output compared to the existing machinery. Running the xarray tests before this change requires an obscure invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ --kconfig_add CONFIG_TEST_XARRAY=y --raw_output=all nothing ``` which on failure produces ``` BUG at check_reserve:513 ... XArray: 6782340 of 6782364 tests passed ``` and exits 0. Running the xarray tests after this change requires a simpler invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ xarray ``` which on failure produces (colors omitted) ``` [09:50:53] ====================== check_reserve ====================== [09:50:53] [FAILED] param-0 [09:50:53] # check_reserve: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_xarray.c:536 [09:50:53] xa_erase(xa, 12345678) != NULL ... [09:50:53] # module: test_xarray [09:50:53] # xarray: pass:26 fail:3 skip:0 total:29 [09:50:53] # Totals: pass:28 fail:3 skip:0 total:31 [09:50:53] ===================== [FAILED] xarray ====================== ``` and exits 1. Use of richer kunit assertions is intentionally omitted to reduce the scope of the change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241205-xarray-kunit-port-v1-1-ee44bc7aa201@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com> Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-12-05 15:11:26 +00:00
xa_erase_index(test, xa, i);
}
for (i = 10; i < BITS_PER_LONG; i++) {
xarray: port tests to kunit Minimally rewrite the XArray unit tests to use kunit. This integrates nicely with existing kunit tools which produce nicer human-readable output compared to the existing machinery. Running the xarray tests before this change requires an obscure invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ --kconfig_add CONFIG_TEST_XARRAY=y --raw_output=all nothing ``` which on failure produces ``` BUG at check_reserve:513 ... XArray: 6782340 of 6782364 tests passed ``` and exits 0. Running the xarray tests after this change requires a simpler invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ xarray ``` which on failure produces (colors omitted) ``` [09:50:53] ====================== check_reserve ====================== [09:50:53] [FAILED] param-0 [09:50:53] # check_reserve: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_xarray.c:536 [09:50:53] xa_erase(xa, 12345678) != NULL ... [09:50:53] # module: test_xarray [09:50:53] # xarray: pass:26 fail:3 skip:0 total:29 [09:50:53] # Totals: pass:28 fail:3 skip:0 total:31 [09:50:53] ===================== [FAILED] xarray ====================== ``` and exits 1. Use of richer kunit assertions is intentionally omitted to reduce the scope of the change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241205-xarray-kunit-port-v1-1-ee44bc7aa201@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com> Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-12-05 15:11:26 +00:00
xa_insert_index(test, xa, 1UL << i);
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_load(xa, (1UL << i) - 1) != NULL);
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_load(xa, (1UL << i) + 1) != NULL);
xarray: port tests to kunit Minimally rewrite the XArray unit tests to use kunit. This integrates nicely with existing kunit tools which produce nicer human-readable output compared to the existing machinery. Running the xarray tests before this change requires an obscure invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ --kconfig_add CONFIG_TEST_XARRAY=y --raw_output=all nothing ``` which on failure produces ``` BUG at check_reserve:513 ... XArray: 6782340 of 6782364 tests passed ``` and exits 0. Running the xarray tests after this change requires a simpler invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ xarray ``` which on failure produces (colors omitted) ``` [09:50:53] ====================== check_reserve ====================== [09:50:53] [FAILED] param-0 [09:50:53] # check_reserve: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_xarray.c:536 [09:50:53] xa_erase(xa, 12345678) != NULL ... [09:50:53] # module: test_xarray [09:50:53] # xarray: pass:26 fail:3 skip:0 total:29 [09:50:53] # Totals: pass:28 fail:3 skip:0 total:31 [09:50:53] ===================== [FAILED] xarray ====================== ``` and exits 1. Use of richer kunit assertions is intentionally omitted to reduce the scope of the change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241205-xarray-kunit-port-v1-1-ee44bc7aa201@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com> Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-12-05 15:11:26 +00:00
xa_erase_index(test, xa, 1UL << i);
xarray: port tests to kunit Minimally rewrite the XArray unit tests to use kunit. This integrates nicely with existing kunit tools which produce nicer human-readable output compared to the existing machinery. Running the xarray tests before this change requires an obscure invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ --kconfig_add CONFIG_TEST_XARRAY=y --raw_output=all nothing ``` which on failure produces ``` BUG at check_reserve:513 ... XArray: 6782340 of 6782364 tests passed ``` and exits 0. Running the xarray tests after this change requires a simpler invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ xarray ``` which on failure produces (colors omitted) ``` [09:50:53] ====================== check_reserve ====================== [09:50:53] [FAILED] param-0 [09:50:53] # check_reserve: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_xarray.c:536 [09:50:53] xa_erase(xa, 12345678) != NULL ... [09:50:53] # module: test_xarray [09:50:53] # xarray: pass:26 fail:3 skip:0 total:29 [09:50:53] # Totals: pass:28 fail:3 skip:0 total:31 [09:50:53] ===================== [FAILED] xarray ====================== ``` and exits 1. Use of richer kunit assertions is intentionally omitted to reduce the scope of the change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241205-xarray-kunit-port-v1-1-ee44bc7aa201@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com> Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-12-05 15:11:26 +00:00
xa_insert_index(test, xa, (1UL << i) - 1);
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_load(xa, (1UL << i) - 2) != NULL);
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_load(xa, 1UL << i) != NULL);
xarray: port tests to kunit Minimally rewrite the XArray unit tests to use kunit. This integrates nicely with existing kunit tools which produce nicer human-readable output compared to the existing machinery. Running the xarray tests before this change requires an obscure invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ --kconfig_add CONFIG_TEST_XARRAY=y --raw_output=all nothing ``` which on failure produces ``` BUG at check_reserve:513 ... XArray: 6782340 of 6782364 tests passed ``` and exits 0. Running the xarray tests after this change requires a simpler invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ xarray ``` which on failure produces (colors omitted) ``` [09:50:53] ====================== check_reserve ====================== [09:50:53] [FAILED] param-0 [09:50:53] # check_reserve: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_xarray.c:536 [09:50:53] xa_erase(xa, 12345678) != NULL ... [09:50:53] # module: test_xarray [09:50:53] # xarray: pass:26 fail:3 skip:0 total:29 [09:50:53] # Totals: pass:28 fail:3 skip:0 total:31 [09:50:53] ===================== [FAILED] xarray ====================== ``` and exits 1. Use of richer kunit assertions is intentionally omitted to reduce the scope of the change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241205-xarray-kunit-port-v1-1-ee44bc7aa201@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com> Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-12-05 15:11:26 +00:00
xa_erase_index(test, xa, (1UL << i) - 1);
}
xarray: port tests to kunit Minimally rewrite the XArray unit tests to use kunit. This integrates nicely with existing kunit tools which produce nicer human-readable output compared to the existing machinery. Running the xarray tests before this change requires an obscure invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ --kconfig_add CONFIG_TEST_XARRAY=y --raw_output=all nothing ``` which on failure produces ``` BUG at check_reserve:513 ... XArray: 6782340 of 6782364 tests passed ``` and exits 0. Running the xarray tests after this change requires a simpler invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ xarray ``` which on failure produces (colors omitted) ``` [09:50:53] ====================== check_reserve ====================== [09:50:53] [FAILED] param-0 [09:50:53] # check_reserve: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_xarray.c:536 [09:50:53] xa_erase(xa, 12345678) != NULL ... [09:50:53] # module: test_xarray [09:50:53] # xarray: pass:26 fail:3 skip:0 total:29 [09:50:53] # Totals: pass:28 fail:3 skip:0 total:31 [09:50:53] ===================== [FAILED] xarray ====================== ``` and exits 1. Use of richer kunit assertions is intentionally omitted to reduce the scope of the change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241205-xarray-kunit-port-v1-1-ee44bc7aa201@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com> Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-12-05 15:11:26 +00:00
xa_insert_index(test, xa, ~0UL);
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_load(xa, 0UL) != NULL);
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_load(xa, ~1UL) != NULL);
xarray: port tests to kunit Minimally rewrite the XArray unit tests to use kunit. This integrates nicely with existing kunit tools which produce nicer human-readable output compared to the existing machinery. Running the xarray tests before this change requires an obscure invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ --kconfig_add CONFIG_TEST_XARRAY=y --raw_output=all nothing ``` which on failure produces ``` BUG at check_reserve:513 ... XArray: 6782340 of 6782364 tests passed ``` and exits 0. Running the xarray tests after this change requires a simpler invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ xarray ``` which on failure produces (colors omitted) ``` [09:50:53] ====================== check_reserve ====================== [09:50:53] [FAILED] param-0 [09:50:53] # check_reserve: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_xarray.c:536 [09:50:53] xa_erase(xa, 12345678) != NULL ... [09:50:53] # module: test_xarray [09:50:53] # xarray: pass:26 fail:3 skip:0 total:29 [09:50:53] # Totals: pass:28 fail:3 skip:0 total:31 [09:50:53] ===================== [FAILED] xarray ====================== ``` and exits 1. Use of richer kunit assertions is intentionally omitted to reduce the scope of the change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241205-xarray-kunit-port-v1-1-ee44bc7aa201@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com> Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-12-05 15:11:26 +00:00
xa_erase_index(test, xa, ~0UL);
XA_BUG_ON(xa, !xa_empty(xa));
}
xarray: port tests to kunit Minimally rewrite the XArray unit tests to use kunit. This integrates nicely with existing kunit tools which produce nicer human-readable output compared to the existing machinery. Running the xarray tests before this change requires an obscure invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ --kconfig_add CONFIG_TEST_XARRAY=y --raw_output=all nothing ``` which on failure produces ``` BUG at check_reserve:513 ... XArray: 6782340 of 6782364 tests passed ``` and exits 0. Running the xarray tests after this change requires a simpler invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ xarray ``` which on failure produces (colors omitted) ``` [09:50:53] ====================== check_reserve ====================== [09:50:53] [FAILED] param-0 [09:50:53] # check_reserve: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_xarray.c:536 [09:50:53] xa_erase(xa, 12345678) != NULL ... [09:50:53] # module: test_xarray [09:50:53] # xarray: pass:26 fail:3 skip:0 total:29 [09:50:53] # Totals: pass:28 fail:3 skip:0 total:31 [09:50:53] ===================== [FAILED] xarray ====================== ``` and exits 1. Use of richer kunit assertions is intentionally omitted to reduce the scope of the change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241205-xarray-kunit-port-v1-1-ee44bc7aa201@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com> Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-12-05 15:11:26 +00:00
static noinline void check_cmpxchg(struct kunit *test)
{
xarray: port tests to kunit Minimally rewrite the XArray unit tests to use kunit. This integrates nicely with existing kunit tools which produce nicer human-readable output compared to the existing machinery. Running the xarray tests before this change requires an obscure invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ --kconfig_add CONFIG_TEST_XARRAY=y --raw_output=all nothing ``` which on failure produces ``` BUG at check_reserve:513 ... XArray: 6782340 of 6782364 tests passed ``` and exits 0. Running the xarray tests after this change requires a simpler invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ xarray ``` which on failure produces (colors omitted) ``` [09:50:53] ====================== check_reserve ====================== [09:50:53] [FAILED] param-0 [09:50:53] # check_reserve: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_xarray.c:536 [09:50:53] xa_erase(xa, 12345678) != NULL ... [09:50:53] # module: test_xarray [09:50:53] # xarray: pass:26 fail:3 skip:0 total:29 [09:50:53] # Totals: pass:28 fail:3 skip:0 total:31 [09:50:53] ===================== [FAILED] xarray ====================== ``` and exits 1. Use of richer kunit assertions is intentionally omitted to reduce the scope of the change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241205-xarray-kunit-port-v1-1-ee44bc7aa201@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com> Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-12-05 15:11:26 +00:00
struct xarray *xa = xa_param(test);
void *FIVE = xa_mk_value(5);
void *SIX = xa_mk_value(6);
void *LOTS = xa_mk_value(12345678);
XA_BUG_ON(xa, !xa_empty(xa));
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_store_index(xa, 12345678, GFP_KERNEL) != NULL);
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_insert(xa, 12345678, xa, GFP_KERNEL) != -EBUSY);
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_cmpxchg(xa, 12345678, SIX, FIVE, GFP_KERNEL) != LOTS);
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_cmpxchg(xa, 12345678, LOTS, FIVE, GFP_KERNEL) != LOTS);
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_cmpxchg(xa, 12345678, FIVE, LOTS, GFP_KERNEL) != FIVE);
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_cmpxchg(xa, 5, FIVE, NULL, GFP_KERNEL) != NULL);
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_cmpxchg(xa, 5, NULL, FIVE, GFP_KERNEL) != NULL);
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_insert(xa, 5, FIVE, GFP_KERNEL) != -EBUSY);
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_cmpxchg(xa, 5, FIVE, NULL, GFP_KERNEL) != FIVE);
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_insert(xa, 5, FIVE, GFP_KERNEL) == -EBUSY);
xarray: port tests to kunit Minimally rewrite the XArray unit tests to use kunit. This integrates nicely with existing kunit tools which produce nicer human-readable output compared to the existing machinery. Running the xarray tests before this change requires an obscure invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ --kconfig_add CONFIG_TEST_XARRAY=y --raw_output=all nothing ``` which on failure produces ``` BUG at check_reserve:513 ... XArray: 6782340 of 6782364 tests passed ``` and exits 0. Running the xarray tests after this change requires a simpler invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ xarray ``` which on failure produces (colors omitted) ``` [09:50:53] ====================== check_reserve ====================== [09:50:53] [FAILED] param-0 [09:50:53] # check_reserve: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_xarray.c:536 [09:50:53] xa_erase(xa, 12345678) != NULL ... [09:50:53] # module: test_xarray [09:50:53] # xarray: pass:26 fail:3 skip:0 total:29 [09:50:53] # Totals: pass:28 fail:3 skip:0 total:31 [09:50:53] ===================== [FAILED] xarray ====================== ``` and exits 1. Use of richer kunit assertions is intentionally omitted to reduce the scope of the change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241205-xarray-kunit-port-v1-1-ee44bc7aa201@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com> Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-12-05 15:11:26 +00:00
xa_erase_index(test, xa, 12345678);
xa_erase_index(test, xa, 5);
XA_BUG_ON(xa, !xa_empty(xa));
}
xarray: port tests to kunit Minimally rewrite the XArray unit tests to use kunit. This integrates nicely with existing kunit tools which produce nicer human-readable output compared to the existing machinery. Running the xarray tests before this change requires an obscure invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ --kconfig_add CONFIG_TEST_XARRAY=y --raw_output=all nothing ``` which on failure produces ``` BUG at check_reserve:513 ... XArray: 6782340 of 6782364 tests passed ``` and exits 0. Running the xarray tests after this change requires a simpler invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ xarray ``` which on failure produces (colors omitted) ``` [09:50:53] ====================== check_reserve ====================== [09:50:53] [FAILED] param-0 [09:50:53] # check_reserve: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_xarray.c:536 [09:50:53] xa_erase(xa, 12345678) != NULL ... [09:50:53] # module: test_xarray [09:50:53] # xarray: pass:26 fail:3 skip:0 total:29 [09:50:53] # Totals: pass:28 fail:3 skip:0 total:31 [09:50:53] ===================== [FAILED] xarray ====================== ``` and exits 1. Use of richer kunit assertions is intentionally omitted to reduce the scope of the change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241205-xarray-kunit-port-v1-1-ee44bc7aa201@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com> Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-12-05 15:11:26 +00:00
static noinline void check_cmpxchg_order(struct kunit *test)
{
#ifdef CONFIG_XARRAY_MULTI
xarray: port tests to kunit Minimally rewrite the XArray unit tests to use kunit. This integrates nicely with existing kunit tools which produce nicer human-readable output compared to the existing machinery. Running the xarray tests before this change requires an obscure invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ --kconfig_add CONFIG_TEST_XARRAY=y --raw_output=all nothing ``` which on failure produces ``` BUG at check_reserve:513 ... XArray: 6782340 of 6782364 tests passed ``` and exits 0. Running the xarray tests after this change requires a simpler invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ xarray ``` which on failure produces (colors omitted) ``` [09:50:53] ====================== check_reserve ====================== [09:50:53] [FAILED] param-0 [09:50:53] # check_reserve: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_xarray.c:536 [09:50:53] xa_erase(xa, 12345678) != NULL ... [09:50:53] # module: test_xarray [09:50:53] # xarray: pass:26 fail:3 skip:0 total:29 [09:50:53] # Totals: pass:28 fail:3 skip:0 total:31 [09:50:53] ===================== [FAILED] xarray ====================== ``` and exits 1. Use of richer kunit assertions is intentionally omitted to reduce the scope of the change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241205-xarray-kunit-port-v1-1-ee44bc7aa201@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com> Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-12-05 15:11:26 +00:00
struct xarray *xa = xa_param(test);
void *FIVE = xa_mk_value(5);
unsigned int i, order = 3;
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_store_order(xa, 0, order, FIVE, GFP_KERNEL));
/* Check entry FIVE has the order saved */
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_get_order(xa, xa_to_value(FIVE)) != order);
/* Check all the tied indexes have the same entry and order */
for (i = 0; i < (1 << order); i++) {
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_load(xa, i) != FIVE);
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_get_order(xa, i) != order);
}
/* Ensure that nothing is stored at index '1 << order' */
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_load(xa, 1 << order) != NULL);
/*
* Additionally, keep the node information and the order at
* '1 << order'
*/
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_store_order(xa, 1 << order, order, FIVE, GFP_KERNEL));
for (i = (1 << order); i < (1 << order) + (1 << order) - 1; i++) {
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_load(xa, i) != FIVE);
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_get_order(xa, i) != order);
}
/* Conditionally replace FIVE entry at index '0' with NULL */
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_cmpxchg(xa, 0, FIVE, NULL, GFP_KERNEL) != FIVE);
/* Verify the order is lost at FIVE (and old) entries */
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_get_order(xa, xa_to_value(FIVE)) != 0);
/* Verify the order and entries are lost in all the tied indexes */
for (i = 0; i < (1 << order); i++) {
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_load(xa, i) != NULL);
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_get_order(xa, i) != 0);
}
/* Verify node and order are kept at '1 << order' */
for (i = (1 << order); i < (1 << order) + (1 << order) - 1; i++) {
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_load(xa, i) != FIVE);
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_get_order(xa, i) != order);
}
xa_store_order(xa, 0, BITS_PER_LONG - 1, NULL, GFP_KERNEL);
XA_BUG_ON(xa, !xa_empty(xa));
#endif
}
xarray: port tests to kunit Minimally rewrite the XArray unit tests to use kunit. This integrates nicely with existing kunit tools which produce nicer human-readable output compared to the existing machinery. Running the xarray tests before this change requires an obscure invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ --kconfig_add CONFIG_TEST_XARRAY=y --raw_output=all nothing ``` which on failure produces ``` BUG at check_reserve:513 ... XArray: 6782340 of 6782364 tests passed ``` and exits 0. Running the xarray tests after this change requires a simpler invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ xarray ``` which on failure produces (colors omitted) ``` [09:50:53] ====================== check_reserve ====================== [09:50:53] [FAILED] param-0 [09:50:53] # check_reserve: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_xarray.c:536 [09:50:53] xa_erase(xa, 12345678) != NULL ... [09:50:53] # module: test_xarray [09:50:53] # xarray: pass:26 fail:3 skip:0 total:29 [09:50:53] # Totals: pass:28 fail:3 skip:0 total:31 [09:50:53] ===================== [FAILED] xarray ====================== ``` and exits 1. Use of richer kunit assertions is intentionally omitted to reduce the scope of the change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241205-xarray-kunit-port-v1-1-ee44bc7aa201@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com> Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-12-05 15:11:26 +00:00
static noinline void check_reserve(struct kunit *test)
{
xarray: port tests to kunit Minimally rewrite the XArray unit tests to use kunit. This integrates nicely with existing kunit tools which produce nicer human-readable output compared to the existing machinery. Running the xarray tests before this change requires an obscure invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ --kconfig_add CONFIG_TEST_XARRAY=y --raw_output=all nothing ``` which on failure produces ``` BUG at check_reserve:513 ... XArray: 6782340 of 6782364 tests passed ``` and exits 0. Running the xarray tests after this change requires a simpler invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ xarray ``` which on failure produces (colors omitted) ``` [09:50:53] ====================== check_reserve ====================== [09:50:53] [FAILED] param-0 [09:50:53] # check_reserve: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_xarray.c:536 [09:50:53] xa_erase(xa, 12345678) != NULL ... [09:50:53] # module: test_xarray [09:50:53] # xarray: pass:26 fail:3 skip:0 total:29 [09:50:53] # Totals: pass:28 fail:3 skip:0 total:31 [09:50:53] ===================== [FAILED] xarray ====================== ``` and exits 1. Use of richer kunit assertions is intentionally omitted to reduce the scope of the change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241205-xarray-kunit-port-v1-1-ee44bc7aa201@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com> Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-12-05 15:11:26 +00:00
struct xarray *xa = xa_param(test);
void *entry;
unsigned long index;
int count;
/* An array with a reserved entry is not empty */
XA_BUG_ON(xa, !xa_empty(xa));
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_reserve(xa, 12345678, GFP_KERNEL) != 0);
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_empty(xa));
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_load(xa, 12345678));
xa_release(xa, 12345678);
XA_BUG_ON(xa, !xa_empty(xa));
/* Releasing a used entry does nothing */
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_reserve(xa, 12345678, GFP_KERNEL) != 0);
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_store_index(xa, 12345678, GFP_NOWAIT) != NULL);
xa_release(xa, 12345678);
xarray: port tests to kunit Minimally rewrite the XArray unit tests to use kunit. This integrates nicely with existing kunit tools which produce nicer human-readable output compared to the existing machinery. Running the xarray tests before this change requires an obscure invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ --kconfig_add CONFIG_TEST_XARRAY=y --raw_output=all nothing ``` which on failure produces ``` BUG at check_reserve:513 ... XArray: 6782340 of 6782364 tests passed ``` and exits 0. Running the xarray tests after this change requires a simpler invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ xarray ``` which on failure produces (colors omitted) ``` [09:50:53] ====================== check_reserve ====================== [09:50:53] [FAILED] param-0 [09:50:53] # check_reserve: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_xarray.c:536 [09:50:53] xa_erase(xa, 12345678) != NULL ... [09:50:53] # module: test_xarray [09:50:53] # xarray: pass:26 fail:3 skip:0 total:29 [09:50:53] # Totals: pass:28 fail:3 skip:0 total:31 [09:50:53] ===================== [FAILED] xarray ====================== ``` and exits 1. Use of richer kunit assertions is intentionally omitted to reduce the scope of the change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241205-xarray-kunit-port-v1-1-ee44bc7aa201@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com> Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-12-05 15:11:26 +00:00
xa_erase_index(test, xa, 12345678);
XA_BUG_ON(xa, !xa_empty(xa));
/* cmpxchg sees a reserved entry as ZERO */
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_reserve(xa, 12345678, GFP_KERNEL) != 0);
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_cmpxchg(xa, 12345678, XA_ZERO_ENTRY,
xa_mk_value(12345678), GFP_NOWAIT) != NULL);
xa_release(xa, 12345678);
xarray: port tests to kunit Minimally rewrite the XArray unit tests to use kunit. This integrates nicely with existing kunit tools which produce nicer human-readable output compared to the existing machinery. Running the xarray tests before this change requires an obscure invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ --kconfig_add CONFIG_TEST_XARRAY=y --raw_output=all nothing ``` which on failure produces ``` BUG at check_reserve:513 ... XArray: 6782340 of 6782364 tests passed ``` and exits 0. Running the xarray tests after this change requires a simpler invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ xarray ``` which on failure produces (colors omitted) ``` [09:50:53] ====================== check_reserve ====================== [09:50:53] [FAILED] param-0 [09:50:53] # check_reserve: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_xarray.c:536 [09:50:53] xa_erase(xa, 12345678) != NULL ... [09:50:53] # module: test_xarray [09:50:53] # xarray: pass:26 fail:3 skip:0 total:29 [09:50:53] # Totals: pass:28 fail:3 skip:0 total:31 [09:50:53] ===================== [FAILED] xarray ====================== ``` and exits 1. Use of richer kunit assertions is intentionally omitted to reduce the scope of the change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241205-xarray-kunit-port-v1-1-ee44bc7aa201@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com> Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-12-05 15:11:26 +00:00
xa_erase_index(test, xa, 12345678);
XA_BUG_ON(xa, !xa_empty(xa));
/* xa_insert treats it as busy */
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_reserve(xa, 12345678, GFP_KERNEL) != 0);
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_insert(xa, 12345678, xa_mk_value(12345678), 0) !=
-EBUSY);
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_empty(xa));
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_erase(xa, 12345678) != NULL);
XA_BUG_ON(xa, !xa_empty(xa));
/* Can iterate through a reserved entry */
xa_store_index(xa, 5, GFP_KERNEL);
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_reserve(xa, 6, GFP_KERNEL) != 0);
xa_store_index(xa, 7, GFP_KERNEL);
count = 0;
xa_for_each(xa, index, entry) {
XA_BUG_ON(xa, index != 5 && index != 7);
count++;
}
XA_BUG_ON(xa, count != 2);
/* If we free a reserved entry, we should be able to allocate it */
if (xa->xa_flags & XA_FLAGS_ALLOC) {
u32 id;
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_alloc(xa, &id, xa_mk_value(8),
XA_LIMIT(5, 10), GFP_KERNEL) != 0);
XA_BUG_ON(xa, id != 8);
xa_release(xa, 6);
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_alloc(xa, &id, xa_mk_value(6),
XA_LIMIT(5, 10), GFP_KERNEL) != 0);
XA_BUG_ON(xa, id != 6);
}
xa_destroy(xa);
}
xarray: port tests to kunit Minimally rewrite the XArray unit tests to use kunit. This integrates nicely with existing kunit tools which produce nicer human-readable output compared to the existing machinery. Running the xarray tests before this change requires an obscure invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ --kconfig_add CONFIG_TEST_XARRAY=y --raw_output=all nothing ``` which on failure produces ``` BUG at check_reserve:513 ... XArray: 6782340 of 6782364 tests passed ``` and exits 0. Running the xarray tests after this change requires a simpler invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ xarray ``` which on failure produces (colors omitted) ``` [09:50:53] ====================== check_reserve ====================== [09:50:53] [FAILED] param-0 [09:50:53] # check_reserve: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_xarray.c:536 [09:50:53] xa_erase(xa, 12345678) != NULL ... [09:50:53] # module: test_xarray [09:50:53] # xarray: pass:26 fail:3 skip:0 total:29 [09:50:53] # Totals: pass:28 fail:3 skip:0 total:31 [09:50:53] ===================== [FAILED] xarray ====================== ``` and exits 1. Use of richer kunit assertions is intentionally omitted to reduce the scope of the change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241205-xarray-kunit-port-v1-1-ee44bc7aa201@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com> Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-12-05 15:11:26 +00:00
static noinline void check_xas_erase(struct kunit *test)
{
xarray: port tests to kunit Minimally rewrite the XArray unit tests to use kunit. This integrates nicely with existing kunit tools which produce nicer human-readable output compared to the existing machinery. Running the xarray tests before this change requires an obscure invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ --kconfig_add CONFIG_TEST_XARRAY=y --raw_output=all nothing ``` which on failure produces ``` BUG at check_reserve:513 ... XArray: 6782340 of 6782364 tests passed ``` and exits 0. Running the xarray tests after this change requires a simpler invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ xarray ``` which on failure produces (colors omitted) ``` [09:50:53] ====================== check_reserve ====================== [09:50:53] [FAILED] param-0 [09:50:53] # check_reserve: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_xarray.c:536 [09:50:53] xa_erase(xa, 12345678) != NULL ... [09:50:53] # module: test_xarray [09:50:53] # xarray: pass:26 fail:3 skip:0 total:29 [09:50:53] # Totals: pass:28 fail:3 skip:0 total:31 [09:50:53] ===================== [FAILED] xarray ====================== ``` and exits 1. Use of richer kunit assertions is intentionally omitted to reduce the scope of the change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241205-xarray-kunit-port-v1-1-ee44bc7aa201@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com> Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-12-05 15:11:26 +00:00
struct xarray *xa = xa_param(test);
XA_STATE(xas, xa, 0);
void *entry;
unsigned long i, j;
for (i = 0; i < 200; i++) {
for (j = i; j < 2 * i + 17; j++) {
xas_set(&xas, j);
do {
xas_lock(&xas);
xas_store(&xas, xa_mk_index(j));
xas_unlock(&xas);
} while (xas_nomem(&xas, GFP_KERNEL));
}
xas_set(&xas, ULONG_MAX);
do {
xas_lock(&xas);
xas_store(&xas, xa_mk_value(0));
xas_unlock(&xas);
} while (xas_nomem(&xas, GFP_KERNEL));
xas_lock(&xas);
xas_store(&xas, NULL);
xas_set(&xas, 0);
j = i;
xas_for_each(&xas, entry, ULONG_MAX) {
XA_BUG_ON(xa, entry != xa_mk_index(j));
xas_store(&xas, NULL);
j++;
}
xas_unlock(&xas);
XA_BUG_ON(xa, !xa_empty(xa));
}
}
#ifdef CONFIG_XARRAY_MULTI
xarray: port tests to kunit Minimally rewrite the XArray unit tests to use kunit. This integrates nicely with existing kunit tools which produce nicer human-readable output compared to the existing machinery. Running the xarray tests before this change requires an obscure invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ --kconfig_add CONFIG_TEST_XARRAY=y --raw_output=all nothing ``` which on failure produces ``` BUG at check_reserve:513 ... XArray: 6782340 of 6782364 tests passed ``` and exits 0. Running the xarray tests after this change requires a simpler invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ xarray ``` which on failure produces (colors omitted) ``` [09:50:53] ====================== check_reserve ====================== [09:50:53] [FAILED] param-0 [09:50:53] # check_reserve: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_xarray.c:536 [09:50:53] xa_erase(xa, 12345678) != NULL ... [09:50:53] # module: test_xarray [09:50:53] # xarray: pass:26 fail:3 skip:0 total:29 [09:50:53] # Totals: pass:28 fail:3 skip:0 total:31 [09:50:53] ===================== [FAILED] xarray ====================== ``` and exits 1. Use of richer kunit assertions is intentionally omitted to reduce the scope of the change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241205-xarray-kunit-port-v1-1-ee44bc7aa201@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com> Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-12-05 15:11:26 +00:00
static noinline void check_multi_store_1(struct kunit *test, unsigned long index,
unsigned int order)
{
xarray: port tests to kunit Minimally rewrite the XArray unit tests to use kunit. This integrates nicely with existing kunit tools which produce nicer human-readable output compared to the existing machinery. Running the xarray tests before this change requires an obscure invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ --kconfig_add CONFIG_TEST_XARRAY=y --raw_output=all nothing ``` which on failure produces ``` BUG at check_reserve:513 ... XArray: 6782340 of 6782364 tests passed ``` and exits 0. Running the xarray tests after this change requires a simpler invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ xarray ``` which on failure produces (colors omitted) ``` [09:50:53] ====================== check_reserve ====================== [09:50:53] [FAILED] param-0 [09:50:53] # check_reserve: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_xarray.c:536 [09:50:53] xa_erase(xa, 12345678) != NULL ... [09:50:53] # module: test_xarray [09:50:53] # xarray: pass:26 fail:3 skip:0 total:29 [09:50:53] # Totals: pass:28 fail:3 skip:0 total:31 [09:50:53] ===================== [FAILED] xarray ====================== ``` and exits 1. Use of richer kunit assertions is intentionally omitted to reduce the scope of the change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241205-xarray-kunit-port-v1-1-ee44bc7aa201@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com> Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-12-05 15:11:26 +00:00
struct xarray *xa = xa_param(test);
XA_STATE(xas, xa, index);
unsigned long min = index & ~((1UL << order) - 1);
unsigned long max = min + (1UL << order);
xa_store_order(xa, index, order, xa_mk_index(index), GFP_KERNEL);
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_load(xa, min) != xa_mk_index(index));
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_load(xa, max - 1) != xa_mk_index(index));
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_load(xa, max) != NULL);
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_load(xa, min - 1) != NULL);
xas_lock(&xas);
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xas_store(&xas, xa_mk_index(min)) != xa_mk_index(index));
xas_unlock(&xas);
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_load(xa, min) != xa_mk_index(min));
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_load(xa, max - 1) != xa_mk_index(min));
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_load(xa, max) != NULL);
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_load(xa, min - 1) != NULL);
xarray: port tests to kunit Minimally rewrite the XArray unit tests to use kunit. This integrates nicely with existing kunit tools which produce nicer human-readable output compared to the existing machinery. Running the xarray tests before this change requires an obscure invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ --kconfig_add CONFIG_TEST_XARRAY=y --raw_output=all nothing ``` which on failure produces ``` BUG at check_reserve:513 ... XArray: 6782340 of 6782364 tests passed ``` and exits 0. Running the xarray tests after this change requires a simpler invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ xarray ``` which on failure produces (colors omitted) ``` [09:50:53] ====================== check_reserve ====================== [09:50:53] [FAILED] param-0 [09:50:53] # check_reserve: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_xarray.c:536 [09:50:53] xa_erase(xa, 12345678) != NULL ... [09:50:53] # module: test_xarray [09:50:53] # xarray: pass:26 fail:3 skip:0 total:29 [09:50:53] # Totals: pass:28 fail:3 skip:0 total:31 [09:50:53] ===================== [FAILED] xarray ====================== ``` and exits 1. Use of richer kunit assertions is intentionally omitted to reduce the scope of the change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241205-xarray-kunit-port-v1-1-ee44bc7aa201@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com> Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-12-05 15:11:26 +00:00
xa_erase_index(test, xa, min);
XA_BUG_ON(xa, !xa_empty(xa));
}
xarray: port tests to kunit Minimally rewrite the XArray unit tests to use kunit. This integrates nicely with existing kunit tools which produce nicer human-readable output compared to the existing machinery. Running the xarray tests before this change requires an obscure invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ --kconfig_add CONFIG_TEST_XARRAY=y --raw_output=all nothing ``` which on failure produces ``` BUG at check_reserve:513 ... XArray: 6782340 of 6782364 tests passed ``` and exits 0. Running the xarray tests after this change requires a simpler invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ xarray ``` which on failure produces (colors omitted) ``` [09:50:53] ====================== check_reserve ====================== [09:50:53] [FAILED] param-0 [09:50:53] # check_reserve: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_xarray.c:536 [09:50:53] xa_erase(xa, 12345678) != NULL ... [09:50:53] # module: test_xarray [09:50:53] # xarray: pass:26 fail:3 skip:0 total:29 [09:50:53] # Totals: pass:28 fail:3 skip:0 total:31 [09:50:53] ===================== [FAILED] xarray ====================== ``` and exits 1. Use of richer kunit assertions is intentionally omitted to reduce the scope of the change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241205-xarray-kunit-port-v1-1-ee44bc7aa201@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com> Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-12-05 15:11:26 +00:00
static noinline void check_multi_store_2(struct kunit *test, unsigned long index,
unsigned int order)
{
xarray: port tests to kunit Minimally rewrite the XArray unit tests to use kunit. This integrates nicely with existing kunit tools which produce nicer human-readable output compared to the existing machinery. Running the xarray tests before this change requires an obscure invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ --kconfig_add CONFIG_TEST_XARRAY=y --raw_output=all nothing ``` which on failure produces ``` BUG at check_reserve:513 ... XArray: 6782340 of 6782364 tests passed ``` and exits 0. Running the xarray tests after this change requires a simpler invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ xarray ``` which on failure produces (colors omitted) ``` [09:50:53] ====================== check_reserve ====================== [09:50:53] [FAILED] param-0 [09:50:53] # check_reserve: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_xarray.c:536 [09:50:53] xa_erase(xa, 12345678) != NULL ... [09:50:53] # module: test_xarray [09:50:53] # xarray: pass:26 fail:3 skip:0 total:29 [09:50:53] # Totals: pass:28 fail:3 skip:0 total:31 [09:50:53] ===================== [FAILED] xarray ====================== ``` and exits 1. Use of richer kunit assertions is intentionally omitted to reduce the scope of the change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241205-xarray-kunit-port-v1-1-ee44bc7aa201@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com> Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-12-05 15:11:26 +00:00
struct xarray *xa = xa_param(test);
XA_STATE(xas, xa, index);
xa_store_order(xa, index, order, xa_mk_value(0), GFP_KERNEL);
xas_lock(&xas);
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xas_store(&xas, xa_mk_value(1)) != xa_mk_value(0));
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xas.xa_index != index);
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xas_store(&xas, NULL) != xa_mk_value(1));
xas_unlock(&xas);
XA_BUG_ON(xa, !xa_empty(xa));
}
xarray: port tests to kunit Minimally rewrite the XArray unit tests to use kunit. This integrates nicely with existing kunit tools which produce nicer human-readable output compared to the existing machinery. Running the xarray tests before this change requires an obscure invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ --kconfig_add CONFIG_TEST_XARRAY=y --raw_output=all nothing ``` which on failure produces ``` BUG at check_reserve:513 ... XArray: 6782340 of 6782364 tests passed ``` and exits 0. Running the xarray tests after this change requires a simpler invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ xarray ``` which on failure produces (colors omitted) ``` [09:50:53] ====================== check_reserve ====================== [09:50:53] [FAILED] param-0 [09:50:53] # check_reserve: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_xarray.c:536 [09:50:53] xa_erase(xa, 12345678) != NULL ... [09:50:53] # module: test_xarray [09:50:53] # xarray: pass:26 fail:3 skip:0 total:29 [09:50:53] # Totals: pass:28 fail:3 skip:0 total:31 [09:50:53] ===================== [FAILED] xarray ====================== ``` and exits 1. Use of richer kunit assertions is intentionally omitted to reduce the scope of the change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241205-xarray-kunit-port-v1-1-ee44bc7aa201@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com> Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-12-05 15:11:26 +00:00
static noinline void check_multi_store_3(struct kunit *test, unsigned long index,
unsigned int order)
{
xarray: port tests to kunit Minimally rewrite the XArray unit tests to use kunit. This integrates nicely with existing kunit tools which produce nicer human-readable output compared to the existing machinery. Running the xarray tests before this change requires an obscure invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ --kconfig_add CONFIG_TEST_XARRAY=y --raw_output=all nothing ``` which on failure produces ``` BUG at check_reserve:513 ... XArray: 6782340 of 6782364 tests passed ``` and exits 0. Running the xarray tests after this change requires a simpler invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ xarray ``` which on failure produces (colors omitted) ``` [09:50:53] ====================== check_reserve ====================== [09:50:53] [FAILED] param-0 [09:50:53] # check_reserve: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_xarray.c:536 [09:50:53] xa_erase(xa, 12345678) != NULL ... [09:50:53] # module: test_xarray [09:50:53] # xarray: pass:26 fail:3 skip:0 total:29 [09:50:53] # Totals: pass:28 fail:3 skip:0 total:31 [09:50:53] ===================== [FAILED] xarray ====================== ``` and exits 1. Use of richer kunit assertions is intentionally omitted to reduce the scope of the change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241205-xarray-kunit-port-v1-1-ee44bc7aa201@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com> Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-12-05 15:11:26 +00:00
struct xarray *xa = xa_param(test);
XA_STATE(xas, xa, 0);
void *entry;
int n = 0;
xa_store_order(xa, index, order, xa_mk_index(index), GFP_KERNEL);
xas_lock(&xas);
xas_for_each(&xas, entry, ULONG_MAX) {
XA_BUG_ON(xa, entry != xa_mk_index(index));
n++;
}
XA_BUG_ON(xa, n != 1);
xas_set(&xas, index + 1);
xas_for_each(&xas, entry, ULONG_MAX) {
XA_BUG_ON(xa, entry != xa_mk_index(index));
n++;
}
XA_BUG_ON(xa, n != 2);
xas_unlock(&xas);
xa_destroy(xa);
}
#endif
xarray: port tests to kunit Minimally rewrite the XArray unit tests to use kunit. This integrates nicely with existing kunit tools which produce nicer human-readable output compared to the existing machinery. Running the xarray tests before this change requires an obscure invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ --kconfig_add CONFIG_TEST_XARRAY=y --raw_output=all nothing ``` which on failure produces ``` BUG at check_reserve:513 ... XArray: 6782340 of 6782364 tests passed ``` and exits 0. Running the xarray tests after this change requires a simpler invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ xarray ``` which on failure produces (colors omitted) ``` [09:50:53] ====================== check_reserve ====================== [09:50:53] [FAILED] param-0 [09:50:53] # check_reserve: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_xarray.c:536 [09:50:53] xa_erase(xa, 12345678) != NULL ... [09:50:53] # module: test_xarray [09:50:53] # xarray: pass:26 fail:3 skip:0 total:29 [09:50:53] # Totals: pass:28 fail:3 skip:0 total:31 [09:50:53] ===================== [FAILED] xarray ====================== ``` and exits 1. Use of richer kunit assertions is intentionally omitted to reduce the scope of the change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241205-xarray-kunit-port-v1-1-ee44bc7aa201@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com> Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-12-05 15:11:26 +00:00
static noinline void check_multi_store(struct kunit *test)
{
#ifdef CONFIG_XARRAY_MULTI
xarray: port tests to kunit Minimally rewrite the XArray unit tests to use kunit. This integrates nicely with existing kunit tools which produce nicer human-readable output compared to the existing machinery. Running the xarray tests before this change requires an obscure invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ --kconfig_add CONFIG_TEST_XARRAY=y --raw_output=all nothing ``` which on failure produces ``` BUG at check_reserve:513 ... XArray: 6782340 of 6782364 tests passed ``` and exits 0. Running the xarray tests after this change requires a simpler invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ xarray ``` which on failure produces (colors omitted) ``` [09:50:53] ====================== check_reserve ====================== [09:50:53] [FAILED] param-0 [09:50:53] # check_reserve: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_xarray.c:536 [09:50:53] xa_erase(xa, 12345678) != NULL ... [09:50:53] # module: test_xarray [09:50:53] # xarray: pass:26 fail:3 skip:0 total:29 [09:50:53] # Totals: pass:28 fail:3 skip:0 total:31 [09:50:53] ===================== [FAILED] xarray ====================== ``` and exits 1. Use of richer kunit assertions is intentionally omitted to reduce the scope of the change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241205-xarray-kunit-port-v1-1-ee44bc7aa201@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com> Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-12-05 15:11:26 +00:00
struct xarray *xa = xa_param(test);
unsigned long i, j, k;
unsigned int max_order = (sizeof(long) == 4) ? 30 : 60;
/* Loading from any position returns the same value */
xa_store_order(xa, 0, 1, xa_mk_value(0), GFP_KERNEL);
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_load(xa, 0) != xa_mk_value(0));
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_load(xa, 1) != xa_mk_value(0));
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_load(xa, 2) != NULL);
rcu_read_lock();
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_to_node(xa_head(xa))->count != 2);
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_to_node(xa_head(xa))->nr_values != 2);
rcu_read_unlock();
/* Storing adjacent to the value does not alter the value */
xa_store(xa, 3, xa, GFP_KERNEL);
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_load(xa, 0) != xa_mk_value(0));
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_load(xa, 1) != xa_mk_value(0));
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_load(xa, 2) != NULL);
rcu_read_lock();
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_to_node(xa_head(xa))->count != 3);
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_to_node(xa_head(xa))->nr_values != 2);
rcu_read_unlock();
/* Overwriting multiple indexes works */
xa_store_order(xa, 0, 2, xa_mk_value(1), GFP_KERNEL);
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_load(xa, 0) != xa_mk_value(1));
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_load(xa, 1) != xa_mk_value(1));
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_load(xa, 2) != xa_mk_value(1));
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_load(xa, 3) != xa_mk_value(1));
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_load(xa, 4) != NULL);
rcu_read_lock();
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_to_node(xa_head(xa))->count != 4);
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_to_node(xa_head(xa))->nr_values != 4);
rcu_read_unlock();
/* We can erase multiple values with a single store */
xa_store_order(xa, 0, BITS_PER_LONG - 1, NULL, GFP_KERNEL);
XA_BUG_ON(xa, !xa_empty(xa));
/* Even when the first slot is empty but the others aren't */
xa_store_index(xa, 1, GFP_KERNEL);
xa_store_index(xa, 2, GFP_KERNEL);
xa_store_order(xa, 0, 2, NULL, GFP_KERNEL);
XA_BUG_ON(xa, !xa_empty(xa));
for (i = 0; i < max_order; i++) {
for (j = 0; j < max_order; j++) {
xa_store_order(xa, 0, i, xa_mk_index(i), GFP_KERNEL);
xa_store_order(xa, 0, j, xa_mk_index(j), GFP_KERNEL);
for (k = 0; k < max_order; k++) {
void *entry = xa_load(xa, (1UL << k) - 1);
if ((i < k) && (j < k))
XA_BUG_ON(xa, entry != NULL);
else
XA_BUG_ON(xa, entry != xa_mk_index(j));
}
xa_erase(xa, 0);
XA_BUG_ON(xa, !xa_empty(xa));
}
}
for (i = 0; i < 20; i++) {
xarray: port tests to kunit Minimally rewrite the XArray unit tests to use kunit. This integrates nicely with existing kunit tools which produce nicer human-readable output compared to the existing machinery. Running the xarray tests before this change requires an obscure invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ --kconfig_add CONFIG_TEST_XARRAY=y --raw_output=all nothing ``` which on failure produces ``` BUG at check_reserve:513 ... XArray: 6782340 of 6782364 tests passed ``` and exits 0. Running the xarray tests after this change requires a simpler invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ xarray ``` which on failure produces (colors omitted) ``` [09:50:53] ====================== check_reserve ====================== [09:50:53] [FAILED] param-0 [09:50:53] # check_reserve: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_xarray.c:536 [09:50:53] xa_erase(xa, 12345678) != NULL ... [09:50:53] # module: test_xarray [09:50:53] # xarray: pass:26 fail:3 skip:0 total:29 [09:50:53] # Totals: pass:28 fail:3 skip:0 total:31 [09:50:53] ===================== [FAILED] xarray ====================== ``` and exits 1. Use of richer kunit assertions is intentionally omitted to reduce the scope of the change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241205-xarray-kunit-port-v1-1-ee44bc7aa201@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com> Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-12-05 15:11:26 +00:00
check_multi_store_1(test, 200, i);
check_multi_store_1(test, 0, i);
check_multi_store_1(test, (1UL << i) + 1, i);
}
xarray: port tests to kunit Minimally rewrite the XArray unit tests to use kunit. This integrates nicely with existing kunit tools which produce nicer human-readable output compared to the existing machinery. Running the xarray tests before this change requires an obscure invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ --kconfig_add CONFIG_TEST_XARRAY=y --raw_output=all nothing ``` which on failure produces ``` BUG at check_reserve:513 ... XArray: 6782340 of 6782364 tests passed ``` and exits 0. Running the xarray tests after this change requires a simpler invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ xarray ``` which on failure produces (colors omitted) ``` [09:50:53] ====================== check_reserve ====================== [09:50:53] [FAILED] param-0 [09:50:53] # check_reserve: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_xarray.c:536 [09:50:53] xa_erase(xa, 12345678) != NULL ... [09:50:53] # module: test_xarray [09:50:53] # xarray: pass:26 fail:3 skip:0 total:29 [09:50:53] # Totals: pass:28 fail:3 skip:0 total:31 [09:50:53] ===================== [FAILED] xarray ====================== ``` and exits 1. Use of richer kunit assertions is intentionally omitted to reduce the scope of the change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241205-xarray-kunit-port-v1-1-ee44bc7aa201@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com> Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-12-05 15:11:26 +00:00
check_multi_store_2(test, 4095, 9);
for (i = 1; i < 20; i++) {
xarray: port tests to kunit Minimally rewrite the XArray unit tests to use kunit. This integrates nicely with existing kunit tools which produce nicer human-readable output compared to the existing machinery. Running the xarray tests before this change requires an obscure invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ --kconfig_add CONFIG_TEST_XARRAY=y --raw_output=all nothing ``` which on failure produces ``` BUG at check_reserve:513 ... XArray: 6782340 of 6782364 tests passed ``` and exits 0. Running the xarray tests after this change requires a simpler invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ xarray ``` which on failure produces (colors omitted) ``` [09:50:53] ====================== check_reserve ====================== [09:50:53] [FAILED] param-0 [09:50:53] # check_reserve: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_xarray.c:536 [09:50:53] xa_erase(xa, 12345678) != NULL ... [09:50:53] # module: test_xarray [09:50:53] # xarray: pass:26 fail:3 skip:0 total:29 [09:50:53] # Totals: pass:28 fail:3 skip:0 total:31 [09:50:53] ===================== [FAILED] xarray ====================== ``` and exits 1. Use of richer kunit assertions is intentionally omitted to reduce the scope of the change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241205-xarray-kunit-port-v1-1-ee44bc7aa201@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com> Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-12-05 15:11:26 +00:00
check_multi_store_3(test, 0, i);
check_multi_store_3(test, 1UL << i, i);
}
#endif
}
test_xarray: add tests for advanced multi-index use Patch series "test_xarray: advanced API multi-index tests", v2. This is a respin of the test_xarray multi-index tests [0] which use and demonstrate the advanced API which is used by the page cache. This should let folks more easily follow how we use multi-index to support for example a min order later in the page cache. It also lets us grow the selftests to mimic more of what we do in the page cache. This patch (of 2): The multi index selftests are great but they don't replicate how we deal with the page cache exactly, which makes it a bit hard to follow as the page cache uses the advanced API. Add tests which use the advanced API, mimicking what we do in the page cache, while at it, extend the example to do what is needed for min order support. [mcgrof@kernel.org: fix soft lockup for advanced-api tests] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240216194329.840555-1-mcgrof@kernel.org [akpm@linux-foundation.org: s/i/loops/, make non-static] [akpm@linux-foundation.org: restore static storage for loop counter] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240131225125.1370598-1-mcgrof@kernel.org Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240131225125.1370598-2-mcgrof@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org> Tested-by: Daniel Gomez <da.gomez@samsung.com> Cc: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org> Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> Cc: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Pankaj Raghav <p.raghav@samsung.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-01-31 22:51:24 +00:00
#ifdef CONFIG_XARRAY_MULTI
/* mimics page cache __filemap_add_folio() */
xarray: port tests to kunit Minimally rewrite the XArray unit tests to use kunit. This integrates nicely with existing kunit tools which produce nicer human-readable output compared to the existing machinery. Running the xarray tests before this change requires an obscure invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ --kconfig_add CONFIG_TEST_XARRAY=y --raw_output=all nothing ``` which on failure produces ``` BUG at check_reserve:513 ... XArray: 6782340 of 6782364 tests passed ``` and exits 0. Running the xarray tests after this change requires a simpler invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ xarray ``` which on failure produces (colors omitted) ``` [09:50:53] ====================== check_reserve ====================== [09:50:53] [FAILED] param-0 [09:50:53] # check_reserve: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_xarray.c:536 [09:50:53] xa_erase(xa, 12345678) != NULL ... [09:50:53] # module: test_xarray [09:50:53] # xarray: pass:26 fail:3 skip:0 total:29 [09:50:53] # Totals: pass:28 fail:3 skip:0 total:31 [09:50:53] ===================== [FAILED] xarray ====================== ``` and exits 1. Use of richer kunit assertions is intentionally omitted to reduce the scope of the change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241205-xarray-kunit-port-v1-1-ee44bc7aa201@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com> Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-12-05 15:11:26 +00:00
static noinline void check_xa_multi_store_adv_add(struct kunit *test,
test_xarray: add tests for advanced multi-index use Patch series "test_xarray: advanced API multi-index tests", v2. This is a respin of the test_xarray multi-index tests [0] which use and demonstrate the advanced API which is used by the page cache. This should let folks more easily follow how we use multi-index to support for example a min order later in the page cache. It also lets us grow the selftests to mimic more of what we do in the page cache. This patch (of 2): The multi index selftests are great but they don't replicate how we deal with the page cache exactly, which makes it a bit hard to follow as the page cache uses the advanced API. Add tests which use the advanced API, mimicking what we do in the page cache, while at it, extend the example to do what is needed for min order support. [mcgrof@kernel.org: fix soft lockup for advanced-api tests] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240216194329.840555-1-mcgrof@kernel.org [akpm@linux-foundation.org: s/i/loops/, make non-static] [akpm@linux-foundation.org: restore static storage for loop counter] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240131225125.1370598-1-mcgrof@kernel.org Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240131225125.1370598-2-mcgrof@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org> Tested-by: Daniel Gomez <da.gomez@samsung.com> Cc: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org> Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> Cc: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Pankaj Raghav <p.raghav@samsung.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-01-31 22:51:24 +00:00
unsigned long index,
unsigned int order,
void *p)
{
xarray: port tests to kunit Minimally rewrite the XArray unit tests to use kunit. This integrates nicely with existing kunit tools which produce nicer human-readable output compared to the existing machinery. Running the xarray tests before this change requires an obscure invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ --kconfig_add CONFIG_TEST_XARRAY=y --raw_output=all nothing ``` which on failure produces ``` BUG at check_reserve:513 ... XArray: 6782340 of 6782364 tests passed ``` and exits 0. Running the xarray tests after this change requires a simpler invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ xarray ``` which on failure produces (colors omitted) ``` [09:50:53] ====================== check_reserve ====================== [09:50:53] [FAILED] param-0 [09:50:53] # check_reserve: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_xarray.c:536 [09:50:53] xa_erase(xa, 12345678) != NULL ... [09:50:53] # module: test_xarray [09:50:53] # xarray: pass:26 fail:3 skip:0 total:29 [09:50:53] # Totals: pass:28 fail:3 skip:0 total:31 [09:50:53] ===================== [FAILED] xarray ====================== ``` and exits 1. Use of richer kunit assertions is intentionally omitted to reduce the scope of the change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241205-xarray-kunit-port-v1-1-ee44bc7aa201@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com> Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-12-05 15:11:26 +00:00
struct xarray *xa = xa_param(test);
test_xarray: add tests for advanced multi-index use Patch series "test_xarray: advanced API multi-index tests", v2. This is a respin of the test_xarray multi-index tests [0] which use and demonstrate the advanced API which is used by the page cache. This should let folks more easily follow how we use multi-index to support for example a min order later in the page cache. It also lets us grow the selftests to mimic more of what we do in the page cache. This patch (of 2): The multi index selftests are great but they don't replicate how we deal with the page cache exactly, which makes it a bit hard to follow as the page cache uses the advanced API. Add tests which use the advanced API, mimicking what we do in the page cache, while at it, extend the example to do what is needed for min order support. [mcgrof@kernel.org: fix soft lockup for advanced-api tests] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240216194329.840555-1-mcgrof@kernel.org [akpm@linux-foundation.org: s/i/loops/, make non-static] [akpm@linux-foundation.org: restore static storage for loop counter] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240131225125.1370598-1-mcgrof@kernel.org Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240131225125.1370598-2-mcgrof@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org> Tested-by: Daniel Gomez <da.gomez@samsung.com> Cc: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org> Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> Cc: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Pankaj Raghav <p.raghav@samsung.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-01-31 22:51:24 +00:00
XA_STATE(xas, xa, index);
unsigned int nrpages = 1UL << order;
/* users are responsible for index alignemnt to the order when adding */
XA_BUG_ON(xa, index & (nrpages - 1));
xas_set_order(&xas, index, order);
do {
xas_lock_irq(&xas);
xas_store(&xas, p);
xas_unlock_irq(&xas);
lib/test_xarray.c: fix error assumptions on check_xa_multi_store_adv_add() While testing lib/test_xarray in userspace I've noticed we can fail with: make -C tools/testing/radix-tree ./tools/testing/radix-tree/xarray BUG at check_xa_multi_store_adv_add:749 xarray: 0x55905fb21a00x head 0x55905fa1d8e0x flags 0 marks 0 0 0 0: 0x55905fa1d8e0x xarray: ../../../lib/test_xarray.c:749: check_xa_multi_store_adv_add: Assertion `0' failed. Aborted We get a failure with a BUG_ON(), and that is because we actually can fail due to -ENOMEM, the check in xas_nomem() will fix this for us so it makes no sense to expect no failure inside the loop. So modify the check and since this is also useful for instructional purposes clarify the situation. The check for XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_load(xa, index) != p) is already done at the end of the loop so just remove the bogus on inside the loop. With this we now pass the test in both kernel and userspace: In userspace: ./tools/testing/radix-tree/xarray XArray: 149092856 of 149092856 tests passed In kernel space: XArray: 148257077 of 148257077 tests passed Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240423192221.301095-3-mcgrof@kernel.org Fixes: a60cc288a1a2 ("test_xarray: add tests for advanced multi-index use") Signed-off-by: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org> Cc: Daniel Gomez <da.gomez@samsung.com> Cc: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org> Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> Cc: "Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Pankaj Raghav <p.raghav@samsung.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-04-23 19:22:21 +00:00
/*
* In our selftest case the only failure we can expect is for
* there not to be enough memory as we're not mimicking the
* entire page cache, so verify that's the only error we can run
* into here. The xas_nomem() which follows will ensure to fix
* that condition for us so to chug on on the loop.
*/
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xas_error(&xas) && xas_error(&xas) != -ENOMEM);
test_xarray: add tests for advanced multi-index use Patch series "test_xarray: advanced API multi-index tests", v2. This is a respin of the test_xarray multi-index tests [0] which use and demonstrate the advanced API which is used by the page cache. This should let folks more easily follow how we use multi-index to support for example a min order later in the page cache. It also lets us grow the selftests to mimic more of what we do in the page cache. This patch (of 2): The multi index selftests are great but they don't replicate how we deal with the page cache exactly, which makes it a bit hard to follow as the page cache uses the advanced API. Add tests which use the advanced API, mimicking what we do in the page cache, while at it, extend the example to do what is needed for min order support. [mcgrof@kernel.org: fix soft lockup for advanced-api tests] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240216194329.840555-1-mcgrof@kernel.org [akpm@linux-foundation.org: s/i/loops/, make non-static] [akpm@linux-foundation.org: restore static storage for loop counter] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240131225125.1370598-1-mcgrof@kernel.org Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240131225125.1370598-2-mcgrof@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org> Tested-by: Daniel Gomez <da.gomez@samsung.com> Cc: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org> Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> Cc: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Pankaj Raghav <p.raghav@samsung.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-01-31 22:51:24 +00:00
} while (xas_nomem(&xas, GFP_KERNEL));
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xas_error(&xas));
lib/test_xarray.c: fix error assumptions on check_xa_multi_store_adv_add() While testing lib/test_xarray in userspace I've noticed we can fail with: make -C tools/testing/radix-tree ./tools/testing/radix-tree/xarray BUG at check_xa_multi_store_adv_add:749 xarray: 0x55905fb21a00x head 0x55905fa1d8e0x flags 0 marks 0 0 0 0: 0x55905fa1d8e0x xarray: ../../../lib/test_xarray.c:749: check_xa_multi_store_adv_add: Assertion `0' failed. Aborted We get a failure with a BUG_ON(), and that is because we actually can fail due to -ENOMEM, the check in xas_nomem() will fix this for us so it makes no sense to expect no failure inside the loop. So modify the check and since this is also useful for instructional purposes clarify the situation. The check for XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_load(xa, index) != p) is already done at the end of the loop so just remove the bogus on inside the loop. With this we now pass the test in both kernel and userspace: In userspace: ./tools/testing/radix-tree/xarray XArray: 149092856 of 149092856 tests passed In kernel space: XArray: 148257077 of 148257077 tests passed Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240423192221.301095-3-mcgrof@kernel.org Fixes: a60cc288a1a2 ("test_xarray: add tests for advanced multi-index use") Signed-off-by: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org> Cc: Daniel Gomez <da.gomez@samsung.com> Cc: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org> Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> Cc: "Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Pankaj Raghav <p.raghav@samsung.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-04-23 19:22:21 +00:00
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_load(xa, index) != p);
test_xarray: add tests for advanced multi-index use Patch series "test_xarray: advanced API multi-index tests", v2. This is a respin of the test_xarray multi-index tests [0] which use and demonstrate the advanced API which is used by the page cache. This should let folks more easily follow how we use multi-index to support for example a min order later in the page cache. It also lets us grow the selftests to mimic more of what we do in the page cache. This patch (of 2): The multi index selftests are great but they don't replicate how we deal with the page cache exactly, which makes it a bit hard to follow as the page cache uses the advanced API. Add tests which use the advanced API, mimicking what we do in the page cache, while at it, extend the example to do what is needed for min order support. [mcgrof@kernel.org: fix soft lockup for advanced-api tests] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240216194329.840555-1-mcgrof@kernel.org [akpm@linux-foundation.org: s/i/loops/, make non-static] [akpm@linux-foundation.org: restore static storage for loop counter] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240131225125.1370598-1-mcgrof@kernel.org Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240131225125.1370598-2-mcgrof@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org> Tested-by: Daniel Gomez <da.gomez@samsung.com> Cc: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org> Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> Cc: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Pankaj Raghav <p.raghav@samsung.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-01-31 22:51:24 +00:00
}
/* mimics page_cache_delete() */
xarray: port tests to kunit Minimally rewrite the XArray unit tests to use kunit. This integrates nicely with existing kunit tools which produce nicer human-readable output compared to the existing machinery. Running the xarray tests before this change requires an obscure invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ --kconfig_add CONFIG_TEST_XARRAY=y --raw_output=all nothing ``` which on failure produces ``` BUG at check_reserve:513 ... XArray: 6782340 of 6782364 tests passed ``` and exits 0. Running the xarray tests after this change requires a simpler invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ xarray ``` which on failure produces (colors omitted) ``` [09:50:53] ====================== check_reserve ====================== [09:50:53] [FAILED] param-0 [09:50:53] # check_reserve: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_xarray.c:536 [09:50:53] xa_erase(xa, 12345678) != NULL ... [09:50:53] # module: test_xarray [09:50:53] # xarray: pass:26 fail:3 skip:0 total:29 [09:50:53] # Totals: pass:28 fail:3 skip:0 total:31 [09:50:53] ===================== [FAILED] xarray ====================== ``` and exits 1. Use of richer kunit assertions is intentionally omitted to reduce the scope of the change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241205-xarray-kunit-port-v1-1-ee44bc7aa201@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com> Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-12-05 15:11:26 +00:00
static noinline void check_xa_multi_store_adv_del_entry(struct kunit *test,
test_xarray: add tests for advanced multi-index use Patch series "test_xarray: advanced API multi-index tests", v2. This is a respin of the test_xarray multi-index tests [0] which use and demonstrate the advanced API which is used by the page cache. This should let folks more easily follow how we use multi-index to support for example a min order later in the page cache. It also lets us grow the selftests to mimic more of what we do in the page cache. This patch (of 2): The multi index selftests are great but they don't replicate how we deal with the page cache exactly, which makes it a bit hard to follow as the page cache uses the advanced API. Add tests which use the advanced API, mimicking what we do in the page cache, while at it, extend the example to do what is needed for min order support. [mcgrof@kernel.org: fix soft lockup for advanced-api tests] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240216194329.840555-1-mcgrof@kernel.org [akpm@linux-foundation.org: s/i/loops/, make non-static] [akpm@linux-foundation.org: restore static storage for loop counter] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240131225125.1370598-1-mcgrof@kernel.org Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240131225125.1370598-2-mcgrof@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org> Tested-by: Daniel Gomez <da.gomez@samsung.com> Cc: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org> Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> Cc: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Pankaj Raghav <p.raghav@samsung.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-01-31 22:51:24 +00:00
unsigned long index,
unsigned int order)
{
xarray: port tests to kunit Minimally rewrite the XArray unit tests to use kunit. This integrates nicely with existing kunit tools which produce nicer human-readable output compared to the existing machinery. Running the xarray tests before this change requires an obscure invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ --kconfig_add CONFIG_TEST_XARRAY=y --raw_output=all nothing ``` which on failure produces ``` BUG at check_reserve:513 ... XArray: 6782340 of 6782364 tests passed ``` and exits 0. Running the xarray tests after this change requires a simpler invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ xarray ``` which on failure produces (colors omitted) ``` [09:50:53] ====================== check_reserve ====================== [09:50:53] [FAILED] param-0 [09:50:53] # check_reserve: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_xarray.c:536 [09:50:53] xa_erase(xa, 12345678) != NULL ... [09:50:53] # module: test_xarray [09:50:53] # xarray: pass:26 fail:3 skip:0 total:29 [09:50:53] # Totals: pass:28 fail:3 skip:0 total:31 [09:50:53] ===================== [FAILED] xarray ====================== ``` and exits 1. Use of richer kunit assertions is intentionally omitted to reduce the scope of the change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241205-xarray-kunit-port-v1-1-ee44bc7aa201@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com> Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-12-05 15:11:26 +00:00
struct xarray *xa = xa_param(test);
test_xarray: add tests for advanced multi-index use Patch series "test_xarray: advanced API multi-index tests", v2. This is a respin of the test_xarray multi-index tests [0] which use and demonstrate the advanced API which is used by the page cache. This should let folks more easily follow how we use multi-index to support for example a min order later in the page cache. It also lets us grow the selftests to mimic more of what we do in the page cache. This patch (of 2): The multi index selftests are great but they don't replicate how we deal with the page cache exactly, which makes it a bit hard to follow as the page cache uses the advanced API. Add tests which use the advanced API, mimicking what we do in the page cache, while at it, extend the example to do what is needed for min order support. [mcgrof@kernel.org: fix soft lockup for advanced-api tests] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240216194329.840555-1-mcgrof@kernel.org [akpm@linux-foundation.org: s/i/loops/, make non-static] [akpm@linux-foundation.org: restore static storage for loop counter] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240131225125.1370598-1-mcgrof@kernel.org Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240131225125.1370598-2-mcgrof@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org> Tested-by: Daniel Gomez <da.gomez@samsung.com> Cc: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org> Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> Cc: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Pankaj Raghav <p.raghav@samsung.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-01-31 22:51:24 +00:00
XA_STATE(xas, xa, index);
xas_set_order(&xas, index, order);
xas_store(&xas, NULL);
xas_init_marks(&xas);
}
xarray: port tests to kunit Minimally rewrite the XArray unit tests to use kunit. This integrates nicely with existing kunit tools which produce nicer human-readable output compared to the existing machinery. Running the xarray tests before this change requires an obscure invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ --kconfig_add CONFIG_TEST_XARRAY=y --raw_output=all nothing ``` which on failure produces ``` BUG at check_reserve:513 ... XArray: 6782340 of 6782364 tests passed ``` and exits 0. Running the xarray tests after this change requires a simpler invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ xarray ``` which on failure produces (colors omitted) ``` [09:50:53] ====================== check_reserve ====================== [09:50:53] [FAILED] param-0 [09:50:53] # check_reserve: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_xarray.c:536 [09:50:53] xa_erase(xa, 12345678) != NULL ... [09:50:53] # module: test_xarray [09:50:53] # xarray: pass:26 fail:3 skip:0 total:29 [09:50:53] # Totals: pass:28 fail:3 skip:0 total:31 [09:50:53] ===================== [FAILED] xarray ====================== ``` and exits 1. Use of richer kunit assertions is intentionally omitted to reduce the scope of the change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241205-xarray-kunit-port-v1-1-ee44bc7aa201@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com> Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-12-05 15:11:26 +00:00
static noinline void check_xa_multi_store_adv_delete(struct kunit *test,
test_xarray: add tests for advanced multi-index use Patch series "test_xarray: advanced API multi-index tests", v2. This is a respin of the test_xarray multi-index tests [0] which use and demonstrate the advanced API which is used by the page cache. This should let folks more easily follow how we use multi-index to support for example a min order later in the page cache. It also lets us grow the selftests to mimic more of what we do in the page cache. This patch (of 2): The multi index selftests are great but they don't replicate how we deal with the page cache exactly, which makes it a bit hard to follow as the page cache uses the advanced API. Add tests which use the advanced API, mimicking what we do in the page cache, while at it, extend the example to do what is needed for min order support. [mcgrof@kernel.org: fix soft lockup for advanced-api tests] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240216194329.840555-1-mcgrof@kernel.org [akpm@linux-foundation.org: s/i/loops/, make non-static] [akpm@linux-foundation.org: restore static storage for loop counter] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240131225125.1370598-1-mcgrof@kernel.org Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240131225125.1370598-2-mcgrof@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org> Tested-by: Daniel Gomez <da.gomez@samsung.com> Cc: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org> Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> Cc: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Pankaj Raghav <p.raghav@samsung.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-01-31 22:51:24 +00:00
unsigned long index,
unsigned int order)
{
xarray: port tests to kunit Minimally rewrite the XArray unit tests to use kunit. This integrates nicely with existing kunit tools which produce nicer human-readable output compared to the existing machinery. Running the xarray tests before this change requires an obscure invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ --kconfig_add CONFIG_TEST_XARRAY=y --raw_output=all nothing ``` which on failure produces ``` BUG at check_reserve:513 ... XArray: 6782340 of 6782364 tests passed ``` and exits 0. Running the xarray tests after this change requires a simpler invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ xarray ``` which on failure produces (colors omitted) ``` [09:50:53] ====================== check_reserve ====================== [09:50:53] [FAILED] param-0 [09:50:53] # check_reserve: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_xarray.c:536 [09:50:53] xa_erase(xa, 12345678) != NULL ... [09:50:53] # module: test_xarray [09:50:53] # xarray: pass:26 fail:3 skip:0 total:29 [09:50:53] # Totals: pass:28 fail:3 skip:0 total:31 [09:50:53] ===================== [FAILED] xarray ====================== ``` and exits 1. Use of richer kunit assertions is intentionally omitted to reduce the scope of the change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241205-xarray-kunit-port-v1-1-ee44bc7aa201@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com> Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-12-05 15:11:26 +00:00
struct xarray *xa = xa_param(test);
test_xarray: add tests for advanced multi-index use Patch series "test_xarray: advanced API multi-index tests", v2. This is a respin of the test_xarray multi-index tests [0] which use and demonstrate the advanced API which is used by the page cache. This should let folks more easily follow how we use multi-index to support for example a min order later in the page cache. It also lets us grow the selftests to mimic more of what we do in the page cache. This patch (of 2): The multi index selftests are great but they don't replicate how we deal with the page cache exactly, which makes it a bit hard to follow as the page cache uses the advanced API. Add tests which use the advanced API, mimicking what we do in the page cache, while at it, extend the example to do what is needed for min order support. [mcgrof@kernel.org: fix soft lockup for advanced-api tests] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240216194329.840555-1-mcgrof@kernel.org [akpm@linux-foundation.org: s/i/loops/, make non-static] [akpm@linux-foundation.org: restore static storage for loop counter] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240131225125.1370598-1-mcgrof@kernel.org Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240131225125.1370598-2-mcgrof@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org> Tested-by: Daniel Gomez <da.gomez@samsung.com> Cc: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org> Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> Cc: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Pankaj Raghav <p.raghav@samsung.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-01-31 22:51:24 +00:00
xa_lock_irq(xa);
xarray: port tests to kunit Minimally rewrite the XArray unit tests to use kunit. This integrates nicely with existing kunit tools which produce nicer human-readable output compared to the existing machinery. Running the xarray tests before this change requires an obscure invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ --kconfig_add CONFIG_TEST_XARRAY=y --raw_output=all nothing ``` which on failure produces ``` BUG at check_reserve:513 ... XArray: 6782340 of 6782364 tests passed ``` and exits 0. Running the xarray tests after this change requires a simpler invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ xarray ``` which on failure produces (colors omitted) ``` [09:50:53] ====================== check_reserve ====================== [09:50:53] [FAILED] param-0 [09:50:53] # check_reserve: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_xarray.c:536 [09:50:53] xa_erase(xa, 12345678) != NULL ... [09:50:53] # module: test_xarray [09:50:53] # xarray: pass:26 fail:3 skip:0 total:29 [09:50:53] # Totals: pass:28 fail:3 skip:0 total:31 [09:50:53] ===================== [FAILED] xarray ====================== ``` and exits 1. Use of richer kunit assertions is intentionally omitted to reduce the scope of the change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241205-xarray-kunit-port-v1-1-ee44bc7aa201@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com> Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-12-05 15:11:26 +00:00
check_xa_multi_store_adv_del_entry(test, index, order);
test_xarray: add tests for advanced multi-index use Patch series "test_xarray: advanced API multi-index tests", v2. This is a respin of the test_xarray multi-index tests [0] which use and demonstrate the advanced API which is used by the page cache. This should let folks more easily follow how we use multi-index to support for example a min order later in the page cache. It also lets us grow the selftests to mimic more of what we do in the page cache. This patch (of 2): The multi index selftests are great but they don't replicate how we deal with the page cache exactly, which makes it a bit hard to follow as the page cache uses the advanced API. Add tests which use the advanced API, mimicking what we do in the page cache, while at it, extend the example to do what is needed for min order support. [mcgrof@kernel.org: fix soft lockup for advanced-api tests] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240216194329.840555-1-mcgrof@kernel.org [akpm@linux-foundation.org: s/i/loops/, make non-static] [akpm@linux-foundation.org: restore static storage for loop counter] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240131225125.1370598-1-mcgrof@kernel.org Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240131225125.1370598-2-mcgrof@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org> Tested-by: Daniel Gomez <da.gomez@samsung.com> Cc: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org> Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> Cc: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Pankaj Raghav <p.raghav@samsung.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-01-31 22:51:24 +00:00
xa_unlock_irq(xa);
}
/* mimics page cache filemap_get_entry() */
static noinline void *test_get_entry(struct xarray *xa, unsigned long index)
{
XA_STATE(xas, xa, index);
void *p;
static unsigned int loops = 0;
rcu_read_lock();
repeat:
xas_reset(&xas);
p = xas_load(&xas);
if (xas_retry(&xas, p))
goto repeat;
rcu_read_unlock();
/*
* This is not part of the page cache, this selftest is pretty
* aggressive and does not want to trust the xarray API but rather
* test it, and for order 20 (4 GiB block size) we can loop over
* over a million entries which can cause a soft lockup. Page cache
* APIs won't be stupid, proper page cache APIs loop over the proper
* order so when using a larger order we skip shared entries.
*/
if (++loops % XA_CHECK_SCHED == 0)
schedule();
return p;
}
static unsigned long some_val = 0xdeadbeef;
static unsigned long some_val_2 = 0xdeaddead;
/* mimics the page cache usage */
xarray: port tests to kunit Minimally rewrite the XArray unit tests to use kunit. This integrates nicely with existing kunit tools which produce nicer human-readable output compared to the existing machinery. Running the xarray tests before this change requires an obscure invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ --kconfig_add CONFIG_TEST_XARRAY=y --raw_output=all nothing ``` which on failure produces ``` BUG at check_reserve:513 ... XArray: 6782340 of 6782364 tests passed ``` and exits 0. Running the xarray tests after this change requires a simpler invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ xarray ``` which on failure produces (colors omitted) ``` [09:50:53] ====================== check_reserve ====================== [09:50:53] [FAILED] param-0 [09:50:53] # check_reserve: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_xarray.c:536 [09:50:53] xa_erase(xa, 12345678) != NULL ... [09:50:53] # module: test_xarray [09:50:53] # xarray: pass:26 fail:3 skip:0 total:29 [09:50:53] # Totals: pass:28 fail:3 skip:0 total:31 [09:50:53] ===================== [FAILED] xarray ====================== ``` and exits 1. Use of richer kunit assertions is intentionally omitted to reduce the scope of the change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241205-xarray-kunit-port-v1-1-ee44bc7aa201@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com> Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-12-05 15:11:26 +00:00
static noinline void check_xa_multi_store_adv(struct kunit *test,
test_xarray: add tests for advanced multi-index use Patch series "test_xarray: advanced API multi-index tests", v2. This is a respin of the test_xarray multi-index tests [0] which use and demonstrate the advanced API which is used by the page cache. This should let folks more easily follow how we use multi-index to support for example a min order later in the page cache. It also lets us grow the selftests to mimic more of what we do in the page cache. This patch (of 2): The multi index selftests are great but they don't replicate how we deal with the page cache exactly, which makes it a bit hard to follow as the page cache uses the advanced API. Add tests which use the advanced API, mimicking what we do in the page cache, while at it, extend the example to do what is needed for min order support. [mcgrof@kernel.org: fix soft lockup for advanced-api tests] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240216194329.840555-1-mcgrof@kernel.org [akpm@linux-foundation.org: s/i/loops/, make non-static] [akpm@linux-foundation.org: restore static storage for loop counter] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240131225125.1370598-1-mcgrof@kernel.org Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240131225125.1370598-2-mcgrof@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org> Tested-by: Daniel Gomez <da.gomez@samsung.com> Cc: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org> Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> Cc: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Pankaj Raghav <p.raghav@samsung.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-01-31 22:51:24 +00:00
unsigned long pos,
unsigned int order)
{
xarray: port tests to kunit Minimally rewrite the XArray unit tests to use kunit. This integrates nicely with existing kunit tools which produce nicer human-readable output compared to the existing machinery. Running the xarray tests before this change requires an obscure invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ --kconfig_add CONFIG_TEST_XARRAY=y --raw_output=all nothing ``` which on failure produces ``` BUG at check_reserve:513 ... XArray: 6782340 of 6782364 tests passed ``` and exits 0. Running the xarray tests after this change requires a simpler invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ xarray ``` which on failure produces (colors omitted) ``` [09:50:53] ====================== check_reserve ====================== [09:50:53] [FAILED] param-0 [09:50:53] # check_reserve: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_xarray.c:536 [09:50:53] xa_erase(xa, 12345678) != NULL ... [09:50:53] # module: test_xarray [09:50:53] # xarray: pass:26 fail:3 skip:0 total:29 [09:50:53] # Totals: pass:28 fail:3 skip:0 total:31 [09:50:53] ===================== [FAILED] xarray ====================== ``` and exits 1. Use of richer kunit assertions is intentionally omitted to reduce the scope of the change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241205-xarray-kunit-port-v1-1-ee44bc7aa201@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com> Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-12-05 15:11:26 +00:00
struct xarray *xa = xa_param(test);
test_xarray: add tests for advanced multi-index use Patch series "test_xarray: advanced API multi-index tests", v2. This is a respin of the test_xarray multi-index tests [0] which use and demonstrate the advanced API which is used by the page cache. This should let folks more easily follow how we use multi-index to support for example a min order later in the page cache. It also lets us grow the selftests to mimic more of what we do in the page cache. This patch (of 2): The multi index selftests are great but they don't replicate how we deal with the page cache exactly, which makes it a bit hard to follow as the page cache uses the advanced API. Add tests which use the advanced API, mimicking what we do in the page cache, while at it, extend the example to do what is needed for min order support. [mcgrof@kernel.org: fix soft lockup for advanced-api tests] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240216194329.840555-1-mcgrof@kernel.org [akpm@linux-foundation.org: s/i/loops/, make non-static] [akpm@linux-foundation.org: restore static storage for loop counter] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240131225125.1370598-1-mcgrof@kernel.org Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240131225125.1370598-2-mcgrof@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org> Tested-by: Daniel Gomez <da.gomez@samsung.com> Cc: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org> Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> Cc: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Pankaj Raghav <p.raghav@samsung.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-01-31 22:51:24 +00:00
unsigned int nrpages = 1UL << order;
unsigned long index, base, next_index, next_next_index;
unsigned int i;
index = pos >> PAGE_SHIFT;
base = round_down(index, nrpages);
next_index = round_down(base + nrpages, nrpages);
next_next_index = round_down(next_index + nrpages, nrpages);
xarray: port tests to kunit Minimally rewrite the XArray unit tests to use kunit. This integrates nicely with existing kunit tools which produce nicer human-readable output compared to the existing machinery. Running the xarray tests before this change requires an obscure invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ --kconfig_add CONFIG_TEST_XARRAY=y --raw_output=all nothing ``` which on failure produces ``` BUG at check_reserve:513 ... XArray: 6782340 of 6782364 tests passed ``` and exits 0. Running the xarray tests after this change requires a simpler invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ xarray ``` which on failure produces (colors omitted) ``` [09:50:53] ====================== check_reserve ====================== [09:50:53] [FAILED] param-0 [09:50:53] # check_reserve: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_xarray.c:536 [09:50:53] xa_erase(xa, 12345678) != NULL ... [09:50:53] # module: test_xarray [09:50:53] # xarray: pass:26 fail:3 skip:0 total:29 [09:50:53] # Totals: pass:28 fail:3 skip:0 total:31 [09:50:53] ===================== [FAILED] xarray ====================== ``` and exits 1. Use of richer kunit assertions is intentionally omitted to reduce the scope of the change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241205-xarray-kunit-port-v1-1-ee44bc7aa201@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com> Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-12-05 15:11:26 +00:00
check_xa_multi_store_adv_add(test, base, order, &some_val);
test_xarray: add tests for advanced multi-index use Patch series "test_xarray: advanced API multi-index tests", v2. This is a respin of the test_xarray multi-index tests [0] which use and demonstrate the advanced API which is used by the page cache. This should let folks more easily follow how we use multi-index to support for example a min order later in the page cache. It also lets us grow the selftests to mimic more of what we do in the page cache. This patch (of 2): The multi index selftests are great but they don't replicate how we deal with the page cache exactly, which makes it a bit hard to follow as the page cache uses the advanced API. Add tests which use the advanced API, mimicking what we do in the page cache, while at it, extend the example to do what is needed for min order support. [mcgrof@kernel.org: fix soft lockup for advanced-api tests] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240216194329.840555-1-mcgrof@kernel.org [akpm@linux-foundation.org: s/i/loops/, make non-static] [akpm@linux-foundation.org: restore static storage for loop counter] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240131225125.1370598-1-mcgrof@kernel.org Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240131225125.1370598-2-mcgrof@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org> Tested-by: Daniel Gomez <da.gomez@samsung.com> Cc: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org> Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> Cc: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Pankaj Raghav <p.raghav@samsung.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-01-31 22:51:24 +00:00
for (i = 0; i < nrpages; i++)
XA_BUG_ON(xa, test_get_entry(xa, base + i) != &some_val);
XA_BUG_ON(xa, test_get_entry(xa, next_index) != NULL);
/* Use order 0 for the next item */
xarray: port tests to kunit Minimally rewrite the XArray unit tests to use kunit. This integrates nicely with existing kunit tools which produce nicer human-readable output compared to the existing machinery. Running the xarray tests before this change requires an obscure invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ --kconfig_add CONFIG_TEST_XARRAY=y --raw_output=all nothing ``` which on failure produces ``` BUG at check_reserve:513 ... XArray: 6782340 of 6782364 tests passed ``` and exits 0. Running the xarray tests after this change requires a simpler invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ xarray ``` which on failure produces (colors omitted) ``` [09:50:53] ====================== check_reserve ====================== [09:50:53] [FAILED] param-0 [09:50:53] # check_reserve: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_xarray.c:536 [09:50:53] xa_erase(xa, 12345678) != NULL ... [09:50:53] # module: test_xarray [09:50:53] # xarray: pass:26 fail:3 skip:0 total:29 [09:50:53] # Totals: pass:28 fail:3 skip:0 total:31 [09:50:53] ===================== [FAILED] xarray ====================== ``` and exits 1. Use of richer kunit assertions is intentionally omitted to reduce the scope of the change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241205-xarray-kunit-port-v1-1-ee44bc7aa201@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com> Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-12-05 15:11:26 +00:00
check_xa_multi_store_adv_add(test, next_index, 0, &some_val_2);
test_xarray: add tests for advanced multi-index use Patch series "test_xarray: advanced API multi-index tests", v2. This is a respin of the test_xarray multi-index tests [0] which use and demonstrate the advanced API which is used by the page cache. This should let folks more easily follow how we use multi-index to support for example a min order later in the page cache. It also lets us grow the selftests to mimic more of what we do in the page cache. This patch (of 2): The multi index selftests are great but they don't replicate how we deal with the page cache exactly, which makes it a bit hard to follow as the page cache uses the advanced API. Add tests which use the advanced API, mimicking what we do in the page cache, while at it, extend the example to do what is needed for min order support. [mcgrof@kernel.org: fix soft lockup for advanced-api tests] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240216194329.840555-1-mcgrof@kernel.org [akpm@linux-foundation.org: s/i/loops/, make non-static] [akpm@linux-foundation.org: restore static storage for loop counter] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240131225125.1370598-1-mcgrof@kernel.org Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240131225125.1370598-2-mcgrof@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org> Tested-by: Daniel Gomez <da.gomez@samsung.com> Cc: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org> Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> Cc: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Pankaj Raghav <p.raghav@samsung.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-01-31 22:51:24 +00:00
XA_BUG_ON(xa, test_get_entry(xa, next_index) != &some_val_2);
/* Remove the next item */
xarray: port tests to kunit Minimally rewrite the XArray unit tests to use kunit. This integrates nicely with existing kunit tools which produce nicer human-readable output compared to the existing machinery. Running the xarray tests before this change requires an obscure invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ --kconfig_add CONFIG_TEST_XARRAY=y --raw_output=all nothing ``` which on failure produces ``` BUG at check_reserve:513 ... XArray: 6782340 of 6782364 tests passed ``` and exits 0. Running the xarray tests after this change requires a simpler invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ xarray ``` which on failure produces (colors omitted) ``` [09:50:53] ====================== check_reserve ====================== [09:50:53] [FAILED] param-0 [09:50:53] # check_reserve: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_xarray.c:536 [09:50:53] xa_erase(xa, 12345678) != NULL ... [09:50:53] # module: test_xarray [09:50:53] # xarray: pass:26 fail:3 skip:0 total:29 [09:50:53] # Totals: pass:28 fail:3 skip:0 total:31 [09:50:53] ===================== [FAILED] xarray ====================== ``` and exits 1. Use of richer kunit assertions is intentionally omitted to reduce the scope of the change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241205-xarray-kunit-port-v1-1-ee44bc7aa201@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com> Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-12-05 15:11:26 +00:00
check_xa_multi_store_adv_delete(test, next_index, 0);
test_xarray: add tests for advanced multi-index use Patch series "test_xarray: advanced API multi-index tests", v2. This is a respin of the test_xarray multi-index tests [0] which use and demonstrate the advanced API which is used by the page cache. This should let folks more easily follow how we use multi-index to support for example a min order later in the page cache. It also lets us grow the selftests to mimic more of what we do in the page cache. This patch (of 2): The multi index selftests are great but they don't replicate how we deal with the page cache exactly, which makes it a bit hard to follow as the page cache uses the advanced API. Add tests which use the advanced API, mimicking what we do in the page cache, while at it, extend the example to do what is needed for min order support. [mcgrof@kernel.org: fix soft lockup for advanced-api tests] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240216194329.840555-1-mcgrof@kernel.org [akpm@linux-foundation.org: s/i/loops/, make non-static] [akpm@linux-foundation.org: restore static storage for loop counter] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240131225125.1370598-1-mcgrof@kernel.org Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240131225125.1370598-2-mcgrof@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org> Tested-by: Daniel Gomez <da.gomez@samsung.com> Cc: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org> Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> Cc: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Pankaj Raghav <p.raghav@samsung.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-01-31 22:51:24 +00:00
/* Now use order for a new pointer */
xarray: port tests to kunit Minimally rewrite the XArray unit tests to use kunit. This integrates nicely with existing kunit tools which produce nicer human-readable output compared to the existing machinery. Running the xarray tests before this change requires an obscure invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ --kconfig_add CONFIG_TEST_XARRAY=y --raw_output=all nothing ``` which on failure produces ``` BUG at check_reserve:513 ... XArray: 6782340 of 6782364 tests passed ``` and exits 0. Running the xarray tests after this change requires a simpler invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ xarray ``` which on failure produces (colors omitted) ``` [09:50:53] ====================== check_reserve ====================== [09:50:53] [FAILED] param-0 [09:50:53] # check_reserve: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_xarray.c:536 [09:50:53] xa_erase(xa, 12345678) != NULL ... [09:50:53] # module: test_xarray [09:50:53] # xarray: pass:26 fail:3 skip:0 total:29 [09:50:53] # Totals: pass:28 fail:3 skip:0 total:31 [09:50:53] ===================== [FAILED] xarray ====================== ``` and exits 1. Use of richer kunit assertions is intentionally omitted to reduce the scope of the change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241205-xarray-kunit-port-v1-1-ee44bc7aa201@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com> Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-12-05 15:11:26 +00:00
check_xa_multi_store_adv_add(test, next_index, order, &some_val_2);
test_xarray: add tests for advanced multi-index use Patch series "test_xarray: advanced API multi-index tests", v2. This is a respin of the test_xarray multi-index tests [0] which use and demonstrate the advanced API which is used by the page cache. This should let folks more easily follow how we use multi-index to support for example a min order later in the page cache. It also lets us grow the selftests to mimic more of what we do in the page cache. This patch (of 2): The multi index selftests are great but they don't replicate how we deal with the page cache exactly, which makes it a bit hard to follow as the page cache uses the advanced API. Add tests which use the advanced API, mimicking what we do in the page cache, while at it, extend the example to do what is needed for min order support. [mcgrof@kernel.org: fix soft lockup for advanced-api tests] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240216194329.840555-1-mcgrof@kernel.org [akpm@linux-foundation.org: s/i/loops/, make non-static] [akpm@linux-foundation.org: restore static storage for loop counter] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240131225125.1370598-1-mcgrof@kernel.org Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240131225125.1370598-2-mcgrof@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org> Tested-by: Daniel Gomez <da.gomez@samsung.com> Cc: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org> Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> Cc: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Pankaj Raghav <p.raghav@samsung.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-01-31 22:51:24 +00:00
for (i = 0; i < nrpages; i++)
XA_BUG_ON(xa, test_get_entry(xa, next_index + i) != &some_val_2);
xarray: port tests to kunit Minimally rewrite the XArray unit tests to use kunit. This integrates nicely with existing kunit tools which produce nicer human-readable output compared to the existing machinery. Running the xarray tests before this change requires an obscure invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ --kconfig_add CONFIG_TEST_XARRAY=y --raw_output=all nothing ``` which on failure produces ``` BUG at check_reserve:513 ... XArray: 6782340 of 6782364 tests passed ``` and exits 0. Running the xarray tests after this change requires a simpler invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ xarray ``` which on failure produces (colors omitted) ``` [09:50:53] ====================== check_reserve ====================== [09:50:53] [FAILED] param-0 [09:50:53] # check_reserve: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_xarray.c:536 [09:50:53] xa_erase(xa, 12345678) != NULL ... [09:50:53] # module: test_xarray [09:50:53] # xarray: pass:26 fail:3 skip:0 total:29 [09:50:53] # Totals: pass:28 fail:3 skip:0 total:31 [09:50:53] ===================== [FAILED] xarray ====================== ``` and exits 1. Use of richer kunit assertions is intentionally omitted to reduce the scope of the change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241205-xarray-kunit-port-v1-1-ee44bc7aa201@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com> Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-12-05 15:11:26 +00:00
check_xa_multi_store_adv_delete(test, next_index, order);
check_xa_multi_store_adv_delete(test, base, order);
test_xarray: add tests for advanced multi-index use Patch series "test_xarray: advanced API multi-index tests", v2. This is a respin of the test_xarray multi-index tests [0] which use and demonstrate the advanced API which is used by the page cache. This should let folks more easily follow how we use multi-index to support for example a min order later in the page cache. It also lets us grow the selftests to mimic more of what we do in the page cache. This patch (of 2): The multi index selftests are great but they don't replicate how we deal with the page cache exactly, which makes it a bit hard to follow as the page cache uses the advanced API. Add tests which use the advanced API, mimicking what we do in the page cache, while at it, extend the example to do what is needed for min order support. [mcgrof@kernel.org: fix soft lockup for advanced-api tests] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240216194329.840555-1-mcgrof@kernel.org [akpm@linux-foundation.org: s/i/loops/, make non-static] [akpm@linux-foundation.org: restore static storage for loop counter] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240131225125.1370598-1-mcgrof@kernel.org Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240131225125.1370598-2-mcgrof@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org> Tested-by: Daniel Gomez <da.gomez@samsung.com> Cc: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org> Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> Cc: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Pankaj Raghav <p.raghav@samsung.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-01-31 22:51:24 +00:00
XA_BUG_ON(xa, !xa_empty(xa));
/* starting fresh again */
/* let's test some holes now */
/* hole at base and next_next */
xarray: port tests to kunit Minimally rewrite the XArray unit tests to use kunit. This integrates nicely with existing kunit tools which produce nicer human-readable output compared to the existing machinery. Running the xarray tests before this change requires an obscure invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ --kconfig_add CONFIG_TEST_XARRAY=y --raw_output=all nothing ``` which on failure produces ``` BUG at check_reserve:513 ... XArray: 6782340 of 6782364 tests passed ``` and exits 0. Running the xarray tests after this change requires a simpler invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ xarray ``` which on failure produces (colors omitted) ``` [09:50:53] ====================== check_reserve ====================== [09:50:53] [FAILED] param-0 [09:50:53] # check_reserve: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_xarray.c:536 [09:50:53] xa_erase(xa, 12345678) != NULL ... [09:50:53] # module: test_xarray [09:50:53] # xarray: pass:26 fail:3 skip:0 total:29 [09:50:53] # Totals: pass:28 fail:3 skip:0 total:31 [09:50:53] ===================== [FAILED] xarray ====================== ``` and exits 1. Use of richer kunit assertions is intentionally omitted to reduce the scope of the change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241205-xarray-kunit-port-v1-1-ee44bc7aa201@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com> Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-12-05 15:11:26 +00:00
check_xa_multi_store_adv_add(test, next_index, order, &some_val_2);
test_xarray: add tests for advanced multi-index use Patch series "test_xarray: advanced API multi-index tests", v2. This is a respin of the test_xarray multi-index tests [0] which use and demonstrate the advanced API which is used by the page cache. This should let folks more easily follow how we use multi-index to support for example a min order later in the page cache. It also lets us grow the selftests to mimic more of what we do in the page cache. This patch (of 2): The multi index selftests are great but they don't replicate how we deal with the page cache exactly, which makes it a bit hard to follow as the page cache uses the advanced API. Add tests which use the advanced API, mimicking what we do in the page cache, while at it, extend the example to do what is needed for min order support. [mcgrof@kernel.org: fix soft lockup for advanced-api tests] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240216194329.840555-1-mcgrof@kernel.org [akpm@linux-foundation.org: s/i/loops/, make non-static] [akpm@linux-foundation.org: restore static storage for loop counter] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240131225125.1370598-1-mcgrof@kernel.org Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240131225125.1370598-2-mcgrof@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org> Tested-by: Daniel Gomez <da.gomez@samsung.com> Cc: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org> Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> Cc: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Pankaj Raghav <p.raghav@samsung.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-01-31 22:51:24 +00:00
for (i = 0; i < nrpages; i++)
XA_BUG_ON(xa, test_get_entry(xa, base + i) != NULL);
for (i = 0; i < nrpages; i++)
XA_BUG_ON(xa, test_get_entry(xa, next_index + i) != &some_val_2);
for (i = 0; i < nrpages; i++)
XA_BUG_ON(xa, test_get_entry(xa, next_next_index + i) != NULL);
xarray: port tests to kunit Minimally rewrite the XArray unit tests to use kunit. This integrates nicely with existing kunit tools which produce nicer human-readable output compared to the existing machinery. Running the xarray tests before this change requires an obscure invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ --kconfig_add CONFIG_TEST_XARRAY=y --raw_output=all nothing ``` which on failure produces ``` BUG at check_reserve:513 ... XArray: 6782340 of 6782364 tests passed ``` and exits 0. Running the xarray tests after this change requires a simpler invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ xarray ``` which on failure produces (colors omitted) ``` [09:50:53] ====================== check_reserve ====================== [09:50:53] [FAILED] param-0 [09:50:53] # check_reserve: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_xarray.c:536 [09:50:53] xa_erase(xa, 12345678) != NULL ... [09:50:53] # module: test_xarray [09:50:53] # xarray: pass:26 fail:3 skip:0 total:29 [09:50:53] # Totals: pass:28 fail:3 skip:0 total:31 [09:50:53] ===================== [FAILED] xarray ====================== ``` and exits 1. Use of richer kunit assertions is intentionally omitted to reduce the scope of the change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241205-xarray-kunit-port-v1-1-ee44bc7aa201@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com> Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-12-05 15:11:26 +00:00
check_xa_multi_store_adv_delete(test, next_index, order);
test_xarray: add tests for advanced multi-index use Patch series "test_xarray: advanced API multi-index tests", v2. This is a respin of the test_xarray multi-index tests [0] which use and demonstrate the advanced API which is used by the page cache. This should let folks more easily follow how we use multi-index to support for example a min order later in the page cache. It also lets us grow the selftests to mimic more of what we do in the page cache. This patch (of 2): The multi index selftests are great but they don't replicate how we deal with the page cache exactly, which makes it a bit hard to follow as the page cache uses the advanced API. Add tests which use the advanced API, mimicking what we do in the page cache, while at it, extend the example to do what is needed for min order support. [mcgrof@kernel.org: fix soft lockup for advanced-api tests] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240216194329.840555-1-mcgrof@kernel.org [akpm@linux-foundation.org: s/i/loops/, make non-static] [akpm@linux-foundation.org: restore static storage for loop counter] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240131225125.1370598-1-mcgrof@kernel.org Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240131225125.1370598-2-mcgrof@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org> Tested-by: Daniel Gomez <da.gomez@samsung.com> Cc: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org> Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> Cc: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Pankaj Raghav <p.raghav@samsung.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-01-31 22:51:24 +00:00
XA_BUG_ON(xa, !xa_empty(xa));
/* hole at base and next */
xarray: port tests to kunit Minimally rewrite the XArray unit tests to use kunit. This integrates nicely with existing kunit tools which produce nicer human-readable output compared to the existing machinery. Running the xarray tests before this change requires an obscure invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ --kconfig_add CONFIG_TEST_XARRAY=y --raw_output=all nothing ``` which on failure produces ``` BUG at check_reserve:513 ... XArray: 6782340 of 6782364 tests passed ``` and exits 0. Running the xarray tests after this change requires a simpler invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ xarray ``` which on failure produces (colors omitted) ``` [09:50:53] ====================== check_reserve ====================== [09:50:53] [FAILED] param-0 [09:50:53] # check_reserve: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_xarray.c:536 [09:50:53] xa_erase(xa, 12345678) != NULL ... [09:50:53] # module: test_xarray [09:50:53] # xarray: pass:26 fail:3 skip:0 total:29 [09:50:53] # Totals: pass:28 fail:3 skip:0 total:31 [09:50:53] ===================== [FAILED] xarray ====================== ``` and exits 1. Use of richer kunit assertions is intentionally omitted to reduce the scope of the change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241205-xarray-kunit-port-v1-1-ee44bc7aa201@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com> Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-12-05 15:11:26 +00:00
check_xa_multi_store_adv_add(test, next_next_index, order, &some_val_2);
test_xarray: add tests for advanced multi-index use Patch series "test_xarray: advanced API multi-index tests", v2. This is a respin of the test_xarray multi-index tests [0] which use and demonstrate the advanced API which is used by the page cache. This should let folks more easily follow how we use multi-index to support for example a min order later in the page cache. It also lets us grow the selftests to mimic more of what we do in the page cache. This patch (of 2): The multi index selftests are great but they don't replicate how we deal with the page cache exactly, which makes it a bit hard to follow as the page cache uses the advanced API. Add tests which use the advanced API, mimicking what we do in the page cache, while at it, extend the example to do what is needed for min order support. [mcgrof@kernel.org: fix soft lockup for advanced-api tests] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240216194329.840555-1-mcgrof@kernel.org [akpm@linux-foundation.org: s/i/loops/, make non-static] [akpm@linux-foundation.org: restore static storage for loop counter] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240131225125.1370598-1-mcgrof@kernel.org Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240131225125.1370598-2-mcgrof@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org> Tested-by: Daniel Gomez <da.gomez@samsung.com> Cc: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org> Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> Cc: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Pankaj Raghav <p.raghav@samsung.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-01-31 22:51:24 +00:00
for (i = 0; i < nrpages; i++)
XA_BUG_ON(xa, test_get_entry(xa, base + i) != NULL);
for (i = 0; i < nrpages; i++)
XA_BUG_ON(xa, test_get_entry(xa, next_index + i) != NULL);
for (i = 0; i < nrpages; i++)
XA_BUG_ON(xa, test_get_entry(xa, next_next_index + i) != &some_val_2);
xarray: port tests to kunit Minimally rewrite the XArray unit tests to use kunit. This integrates nicely with existing kunit tools which produce nicer human-readable output compared to the existing machinery. Running the xarray tests before this change requires an obscure invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ --kconfig_add CONFIG_TEST_XARRAY=y --raw_output=all nothing ``` which on failure produces ``` BUG at check_reserve:513 ... XArray: 6782340 of 6782364 tests passed ``` and exits 0. Running the xarray tests after this change requires a simpler invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ xarray ``` which on failure produces (colors omitted) ``` [09:50:53] ====================== check_reserve ====================== [09:50:53] [FAILED] param-0 [09:50:53] # check_reserve: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_xarray.c:536 [09:50:53] xa_erase(xa, 12345678) != NULL ... [09:50:53] # module: test_xarray [09:50:53] # xarray: pass:26 fail:3 skip:0 total:29 [09:50:53] # Totals: pass:28 fail:3 skip:0 total:31 [09:50:53] ===================== [FAILED] xarray ====================== ``` and exits 1. Use of richer kunit assertions is intentionally omitted to reduce the scope of the change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241205-xarray-kunit-port-v1-1-ee44bc7aa201@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com> Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-12-05 15:11:26 +00:00
check_xa_multi_store_adv_delete(test, next_next_index, order);
test_xarray: add tests for advanced multi-index use Patch series "test_xarray: advanced API multi-index tests", v2. This is a respin of the test_xarray multi-index tests [0] which use and demonstrate the advanced API which is used by the page cache. This should let folks more easily follow how we use multi-index to support for example a min order later in the page cache. It also lets us grow the selftests to mimic more of what we do in the page cache. This patch (of 2): The multi index selftests are great but they don't replicate how we deal with the page cache exactly, which makes it a bit hard to follow as the page cache uses the advanced API. Add tests which use the advanced API, mimicking what we do in the page cache, while at it, extend the example to do what is needed for min order support. [mcgrof@kernel.org: fix soft lockup for advanced-api tests] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240216194329.840555-1-mcgrof@kernel.org [akpm@linux-foundation.org: s/i/loops/, make non-static] [akpm@linux-foundation.org: restore static storage for loop counter] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240131225125.1370598-1-mcgrof@kernel.org Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240131225125.1370598-2-mcgrof@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org> Tested-by: Daniel Gomez <da.gomez@samsung.com> Cc: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org> Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> Cc: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Pankaj Raghav <p.raghav@samsung.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-01-31 22:51:24 +00:00
XA_BUG_ON(xa, !xa_empty(xa));
}
#endif
xarray: port tests to kunit Minimally rewrite the XArray unit tests to use kunit. This integrates nicely with existing kunit tools which produce nicer human-readable output compared to the existing machinery. Running the xarray tests before this change requires an obscure invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ --kconfig_add CONFIG_TEST_XARRAY=y --raw_output=all nothing ``` which on failure produces ``` BUG at check_reserve:513 ... XArray: 6782340 of 6782364 tests passed ``` and exits 0. Running the xarray tests after this change requires a simpler invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ xarray ``` which on failure produces (colors omitted) ``` [09:50:53] ====================== check_reserve ====================== [09:50:53] [FAILED] param-0 [09:50:53] # check_reserve: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_xarray.c:536 [09:50:53] xa_erase(xa, 12345678) != NULL ... [09:50:53] # module: test_xarray [09:50:53] # xarray: pass:26 fail:3 skip:0 total:29 [09:50:53] # Totals: pass:28 fail:3 skip:0 total:31 [09:50:53] ===================== [FAILED] xarray ====================== ``` and exits 1. Use of richer kunit assertions is intentionally omitted to reduce the scope of the change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241205-xarray-kunit-port-v1-1-ee44bc7aa201@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com> Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-12-05 15:11:26 +00:00
static noinline void check_multi_store_advanced(struct kunit *test)
test_xarray: add tests for advanced multi-index use Patch series "test_xarray: advanced API multi-index tests", v2. This is a respin of the test_xarray multi-index tests [0] which use and demonstrate the advanced API which is used by the page cache. This should let folks more easily follow how we use multi-index to support for example a min order later in the page cache. It also lets us grow the selftests to mimic more of what we do in the page cache. This patch (of 2): The multi index selftests are great but they don't replicate how we deal with the page cache exactly, which makes it a bit hard to follow as the page cache uses the advanced API. Add tests which use the advanced API, mimicking what we do in the page cache, while at it, extend the example to do what is needed for min order support. [mcgrof@kernel.org: fix soft lockup for advanced-api tests] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240216194329.840555-1-mcgrof@kernel.org [akpm@linux-foundation.org: s/i/loops/, make non-static] [akpm@linux-foundation.org: restore static storage for loop counter] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240131225125.1370598-1-mcgrof@kernel.org Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240131225125.1370598-2-mcgrof@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org> Tested-by: Daniel Gomez <da.gomez@samsung.com> Cc: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org> Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> Cc: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Pankaj Raghav <p.raghav@samsung.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-01-31 22:51:24 +00:00
{
#ifdef CONFIG_XARRAY_MULTI
unsigned int max_order = IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_XARRAY_MULTI) ? 20 : 1;
unsigned long end = ULONG_MAX/2;
unsigned long pos, i;
/*
* About 117 million tests below.
*/
for (pos = 7; pos < end; pos = (pos * pos) + 564) {
for (i = 0; i < max_order; i++) {
xarray: port tests to kunit Minimally rewrite the XArray unit tests to use kunit. This integrates nicely with existing kunit tools which produce nicer human-readable output compared to the existing machinery. Running the xarray tests before this change requires an obscure invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ --kconfig_add CONFIG_TEST_XARRAY=y --raw_output=all nothing ``` which on failure produces ``` BUG at check_reserve:513 ... XArray: 6782340 of 6782364 tests passed ``` and exits 0. Running the xarray tests after this change requires a simpler invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ xarray ``` which on failure produces (colors omitted) ``` [09:50:53] ====================== check_reserve ====================== [09:50:53] [FAILED] param-0 [09:50:53] # check_reserve: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_xarray.c:536 [09:50:53] xa_erase(xa, 12345678) != NULL ... [09:50:53] # module: test_xarray [09:50:53] # xarray: pass:26 fail:3 skip:0 total:29 [09:50:53] # Totals: pass:28 fail:3 skip:0 total:31 [09:50:53] ===================== [FAILED] xarray ====================== ``` and exits 1. Use of richer kunit assertions is intentionally omitted to reduce the scope of the change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241205-xarray-kunit-port-v1-1-ee44bc7aa201@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com> Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-12-05 15:11:26 +00:00
check_xa_multi_store_adv(test, pos, i);
check_xa_multi_store_adv(test, pos + 157, i);
test_xarray: add tests for advanced multi-index use Patch series "test_xarray: advanced API multi-index tests", v2. This is a respin of the test_xarray multi-index tests [0] which use and demonstrate the advanced API which is used by the page cache. This should let folks more easily follow how we use multi-index to support for example a min order later in the page cache. It also lets us grow the selftests to mimic more of what we do in the page cache. This patch (of 2): The multi index selftests are great but they don't replicate how we deal with the page cache exactly, which makes it a bit hard to follow as the page cache uses the advanced API. Add tests which use the advanced API, mimicking what we do in the page cache, while at it, extend the example to do what is needed for min order support. [mcgrof@kernel.org: fix soft lockup for advanced-api tests] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240216194329.840555-1-mcgrof@kernel.org [akpm@linux-foundation.org: s/i/loops/, make non-static] [akpm@linux-foundation.org: restore static storage for loop counter] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240131225125.1370598-1-mcgrof@kernel.org Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240131225125.1370598-2-mcgrof@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org> Tested-by: Daniel Gomez <da.gomez@samsung.com> Cc: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org> Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> Cc: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Pankaj Raghav <p.raghav@samsung.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-01-31 22:51:24 +00:00
}
}
#endif
}
xarray: port tests to kunit Minimally rewrite the XArray unit tests to use kunit. This integrates nicely with existing kunit tools which produce nicer human-readable output compared to the existing machinery. Running the xarray tests before this change requires an obscure invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ --kconfig_add CONFIG_TEST_XARRAY=y --raw_output=all nothing ``` which on failure produces ``` BUG at check_reserve:513 ... XArray: 6782340 of 6782364 tests passed ``` and exits 0. Running the xarray tests after this change requires a simpler invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ xarray ``` which on failure produces (colors omitted) ``` [09:50:53] ====================== check_reserve ====================== [09:50:53] [FAILED] param-0 [09:50:53] # check_reserve: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_xarray.c:536 [09:50:53] xa_erase(xa, 12345678) != NULL ... [09:50:53] # module: test_xarray [09:50:53] # xarray: pass:26 fail:3 skip:0 total:29 [09:50:53] # Totals: pass:28 fail:3 skip:0 total:31 [09:50:53] ===================== [FAILED] xarray ====================== ``` and exits 1. Use of richer kunit assertions is intentionally omitted to reduce the scope of the change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241205-xarray-kunit-port-v1-1-ee44bc7aa201@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com> Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-12-05 15:11:26 +00:00
static noinline void check_xa_alloc_1(struct kunit *test, struct xarray *xa, unsigned int base)
{
int i;
u32 id;
XA_BUG_ON(xa, !xa_empty(xa));
/* An empty array should assign %base to the first alloc */
xarray: port tests to kunit Minimally rewrite the XArray unit tests to use kunit. This integrates nicely with existing kunit tools which produce nicer human-readable output compared to the existing machinery. Running the xarray tests before this change requires an obscure invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ --kconfig_add CONFIG_TEST_XARRAY=y --raw_output=all nothing ``` which on failure produces ``` BUG at check_reserve:513 ... XArray: 6782340 of 6782364 tests passed ``` and exits 0. Running the xarray tests after this change requires a simpler invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ xarray ``` which on failure produces (colors omitted) ``` [09:50:53] ====================== check_reserve ====================== [09:50:53] [FAILED] param-0 [09:50:53] # check_reserve: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_xarray.c:536 [09:50:53] xa_erase(xa, 12345678) != NULL ... [09:50:53] # module: test_xarray [09:50:53] # xarray: pass:26 fail:3 skip:0 total:29 [09:50:53] # Totals: pass:28 fail:3 skip:0 total:31 [09:50:53] ===================== [FAILED] xarray ====================== ``` and exits 1. Use of richer kunit assertions is intentionally omitted to reduce the scope of the change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241205-xarray-kunit-port-v1-1-ee44bc7aa201@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com> Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-12-05 15:11:26 +00:00
xa_alloc_index(test, xa, base, GFP_KERNEL);
/* Erasing it should make the array empty again */
xarray: port tests to kunit Minimally rewrite the XArray unit tests to use kunit. This integrates nicely with existing kunit tools which produce nicer human-readable output compared to the existing machinery. Running the xarray tests before this change requires an obscure invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ --kconfig_add CONFIG_TEST_XARRAY=y --raw_output=all nothing ``` which on failure produces ``` BUG at check_reserve:513 ... XArray: 6782340 of 6782364 tests passed ``` and exits 0. Running the xarray tests after this change requires a simpler invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ xarray ``` which on failure produces (colors omitted) ``` [09:50:53] ====================== check_reserve ====================== [09:50:53] [FAILED] param-0 [09:50:53] # check_reserve: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_xarray.c:536 [09:50:53] xa_erase(xa, 12345678) != NULL ... [09:50:53] # module: test_xarray [09:50:53] # xarray: pass:26 fail:3 skip:0 total:29 [09:50:53] # Totals: pass:28 fail:3 skip:0 total:31 [09:50:53] ===================== [FAILED] xarray ====================== ``` and exits 1. Use of richer kunit assertions is intentionally omitted to reduce the scope of the change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241205-xarray-kunit-port-v1-1-ee44bc7aa201@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com> Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-12-05 15:11:26 +00:00
xa_erase_index(test, xa, base);
XA_BUG_ON(xa, !xa_empty(xa));
/* And it should assign %base again */
xarray: port tests to kunit Minimally rewrite the XArray unit tests to use kunit. This integrates nicely with existing kunit tools which produce nicer human-readable output compared to the existing machinery. Running the xarray tests before this change requires an obscure invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ --kconfig_add CONFIG_TEST_XARRAY=y --raw_output=all nothing ``` which on failure produces ``` BUG at check_reserve:513 ... XArray: 6782340 of 6782364 tests passed ``` and exits 0. Running the xarray tests after this change requires a simpler invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ xarray ``` which on failure produces (colors omitted) ``` [09:50:53] ====================== check_reserve ====================== [09:50:53] [FAILED] param-0 [09:50:53] # check_reserve: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_xarray.c:536 [09:50:53] xa_erase(xa, 12345678) != NULL ... [09:50:53] # module: test_xarray [09:50:53] # xarray: pass:26 fail:3 skip:0 total:29 [09:50:53] # Totals: pass:28 fail:3 skip:0 total:31 [09:50:53] ===================== [FAILED] xarray ====================== ``` and exits 1. Use of richer kunit assertions is intentionally omitted to reduce the scope of the change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241205-xarray-kunit-port-v1-1-ee44bc7aa201@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com> Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-12-05 15:11:26 +00:00
xa_alloc_index(test, xa, base, GFP_KERNEL);
/* Allocating and then erasing a lot should not lose base */
for (i = base + 1; i < 2 * XA_CHUNK_SIZE; i++)
xarray: port tests to kunit Minimally rewrite the XArray unit tests to use kunit. This integrates nicely with existing kunit tools which produce nicer human-readable output compared to the existing machinery. Running the xarray tests before this change requires an obscure invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ --kconfig_add CONFIG_TEST_XARRAY=y --raw_output=all nothing ``` which on failure produces ``` BUG at check_reserve:513 ... XArray: 6782340 of 6782364 tests passed ``` and exits 0. Running the xarray tests after this change requires a simpler invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ xarray ``` which on failure produces (colors omitted) ``` [09:50:53] ====================== check_reserve ====================== [09:50:53] [FAILED] param-0 [09:50:53] # check_reserve: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_xarray.c:536 [09:50:53] xa_erase(xa, 12345678) != NULL ... [09:50:53] # module: test_xarray [09:50:53] # xarray: pass:26 fail:3 skip:0 total:29 [09:50:53] # Totals: pass:28 fail:3 skip:0 total:31 [09:50:53] ===================== [FAILED] xarray ====================== ``` and exits 1. Use of richer kunit assertions is intentionally omitted to reduce the scope of the change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241205-xarray-kunit-port-v1-1-ee44bc7aa201@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com> Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-12-05 15:11:26 +00:00
xa_alloc_index(test, xa, i, GFP_KERNEL);
for (i = base; i < 2 * XA_CHUNK_SIZE; i++)
xarray: port tests to kunit Minimally rewrite the XArray unit tests to use kunit. This integrates nicely with existing kunit tools which produce nicer human-readable output compared to the existing machinery. Running the xarray tests before this change requires an obscure invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ --kconfig_add CONFIG_TEST_XARRAY=y --raw_output=all nothing ``` which on failure produces ``` BUG at check_reserve:513 ... XArray: 6782340 of 6782364 tests passed ``` and exits 0. Running the xarray tests after this change requires a simpler invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ xarray ``` which on failure produces (colors omitted) ``` [09:50:53] ====================== check_reserve ====================== [09:50:53] [FAILED] param-0 [09:50:53] # check_reserve: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_xarray.c:536 [09:50:53] xa_erase(xa, 12345678) != NULL ... [09:50:53] # module: test_xarray [09:50:53] # xarray: pass:26 fail:3 skip:0 total:29 [09:50:53] # Totals: pass:28 fail:3 skip:0 total:31 [09:50:53] ===================== [FAILED] xarray ====================== ``` and exits 1. Use of richer kunit assertions is intentionally omitted to reduce the scope of the change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241205-xarray-kunit-port-v1-1-ee44bc7aa201@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com> Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-12-05 15:11:26 +00:00
xa_erase_index(test, xa, i);
xa_alloc_index(test, xa, base, GFP_KERNEL);
/* Destroying the array should do the same as erasing */
xa_destroy(xa);
/* And it should assign %base again */
xarray: port tests to kunit Minimally rewrite the XArray unit tests to use kunit. This integrates nicely with existing kunit tools which produce nicer human-readable output compared to the existing machinery. Running the xarray tests before this change requires an obscure invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ --kconfig_add CONFIG_TEST_XARRAY=y --raw_output=all nothing ``` which on failure produces ``` BUG at check_reserve:513 ... XArray: 6782340 of 6782364 tests passed ``` and exits 0. Running the xarray tests after this change requires a simpler invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ xarray ``` which on failure produces (colors omitted) ``` [09:50:53] ====================== check_reserve ====================== [09:50:53] [FAILED] param-0 [09:50:53] # check_reserve: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_xarray.c:536 [09:50:53] xa_erase(xa, 12345678) != NULL ... [09:50:53] # module: test_xarray [09:50:53] # xarray: pass:26 fail:3 skip:0 total:29 [09:50:53] # Totals: pass:28 fail:3 skip:0 total:31 [09:50:53] ===================== [FAILED] xarray ====================== ``` and exits 1. Use of richer kunit assertions is intentionally omitted to reduce the scope of the change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241205-xarray-kunit-port-v1-1-ee44bc7aa201@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com> Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-12-05 15:11:26 +00:00
xa_alloc_index(test, xa, base, GFP_KERNEL);
/* The next assigned ID should be base+1 */
xarray: port tests to kunit Minimally rewrite the XArray unit tests to use kunit. This integrates nicely with existing kunit tools which produce nicer human-readable output compared to the existing machinery. Running the xarray tests before this change requires an obscure invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ --kconfig_add CONFIG_TEST_XARRAY=y --raw_output=all nothing ``` which on failure produces ``` BUG at check_reserve:513 ... XArray: 6782340 of 6782364 tests passed ``` and exits 0. Running the xarray tests after this change requires a simpler invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ xarray ``` which on failure produces (colors omitted) ``` [09:50:53] ====================== check_reserve ====================== [09:50:53] [FAILED] param-0 [09:50:53] # check_reserve: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_xarray.c:536 [09:50:53] xa_erase(xa, 12345678) != NULL ... [09:50:53] # module: test_xarray [09:50:53] # xarray: pass:26 fail:3 skip:0 total:29 [09:50:53] # Totals: pass:28 fail:3 skip:0 total:31 [09:50:53] ===================== [FAILED] xarray ====================== ``` and exits 1. Use of richer kunit assertions is intentionally omitted to reduce the scope of the change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241205-xarray-kunit-port-v1-1-ee44bc7aa201@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com> Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-12-05 15:11:26 +00:00
xa_alloc_index(test, xa, base + 1, GFP_KERNEL);
xa_erase_index(test, xa, base + 1);
/* Storing a value should mark it used */
xa_store_index(xa, base + 1, GFP_KERNEL);
xarray: port tests to kunit Minimally rewrite the XArray unit tests to use kunit. This integrates nicely with existing kunit tools which produce nicer human-readable output compared to the existing machinery. Running the xarray tests before this change requires an obscure invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ --kconfig_add CONFIG_TEST_XARRAY=y --raw_output=all nothing ``` which on failure produces ``` BUG at check_reserve:513 ... XArray: 6782340 of 6782364 tests passed ``` and exits 0. Running the xarray tests after this change requires a simpler invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ xarray ``` which on failure produces (colors omitted) ``` [09:50:53] ====================== check_reserve ====================== [09:50:53] [FAILED] param-0 [09:50:53] # check_reserve: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_xarray.c:536 [09:50:53] xa_erase(xa, 12345678) != NULL ... [09:50:53] # module: test_xarray [09:50:53] # xarray: pass:26 fail:3 skip:0 total:29 [09:50:53] # Totals: pass:28 fail:3 skip:0 total:31 [09:50:53] ===================== [FAILED] xarray ====================== ``` and exits 1. Use of richer kunit assertions is intentionally omitted to reduce the scope of the change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241205-xarray-kunit-port-v1-1-ee44bc7aa201@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com> Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-12-05 15:11:26 +00:00
xa_alloc_index(test, xa, base + 2, GFP_KERNEL);
/* If we then erase base, it should be free */
xarray: port tests to kunit Minimally rewrite the XArray unit tests to use kunit. This integrates nicely with existing kunit tools which produce nicer human-readable output compared to the existing machinery. Running the xarray tests before this change requires an obscure invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ --kconfig_add CONFIG_TEST_XARRAY=y --raw_output=all nothing ``` which on failure produces ``` BUG at check_reserve:513 ... XArray: 6782340 of 6782364 tests passed ``` and exits 0. Running the xarray tests after this change requires a simpler invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ xarray ``` which on failure produces (colors omitted) ``` [09:50:53] ====================== check_reserve ====================== [09:50:53] [FAILED] param-0 [09:50:53] # check_reserve: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_xarray.c:536 [09:50:53] xa_erase(xa, 12345678) != NULL ... [09:50:53] # module: test_xarray [09:50:53] # xarray: pass:26 fail:3 skip:0 total:29 [09:50:53] # Totals: pass:28 fail:3 skip:0 total:31 [09:50:53] ===================== [FAILED] xarray ====================== ``` and exits 1. Use of richer kunit assertions is intentionally omitted to reduce the scope of the change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241205-xarray-kunit-port-v1-1-ee44bc7aa201@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com> Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-12-05 15:11:26 +00:00
xa_erase_index(test, xa, base);
xa_alloc_index(test, xa, base, GFP_KERNEL);
xarray: port tests to kunit Minimally rewrite the XArray unit tests to use kunit. This integrates nicely with existing kunit tools which produce nicer human-readable output compared to the existing machinery. Running the xarray tests before this change requires an obscure invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ --kconfig_add CONFIG_TEST_XARRAY=y --raw_output=all nothing ``` which on failure produces ``` BUG at check_reserve:513 ... XArray: 6782340 of 6782364 tests passed ``` and exits 0. Running the xarray tests after this change requires a simpler invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ xarray ``` which on failure produces (colors omitted) ``` [09:50:53] ====================== check_reserve ====================== [09:50:53] [FAILED] param-0 [09:50:53] # check_reserve: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_xarray.c:536 [09:50:53] xa_erase(xa, 12345678) != NULL ... [09:50:53] # module: test_xarray [09:50:53] # xarray: pass:26 fail:3 skip:0 total:29 [09:50:53] # Totals: pass:28 fail:3 skip:0 total:31 [09:50:53] ===================== [FAILED] xarray ====================== ``` and exits 1. Use of richer kunit assertions is intentionally omitted to reduce the scope of the change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241205-xarray-kunit-port-v1-1-ee44bc7aa201@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com> Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-12-05 15:11:26 +00:00
xa_erase_index(test, xa, base + 1);
xa_erase_index(test, xa, base + 2);
for (i = 1; i < 5000; i++) {
xarray: port tests to kunit Minimally rewrite the XArray unit tests to use kunit. This integrates nicely with existing kunit tools which produce nicer human-readable output compared to the existing machinery. Running the xarray tests before this change requires an obscure invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ --kconfig_add CONFIG_TEST_XARRAY=y --raw_output=all nothing ``` which on failure produces ``` BUG at check_reserve:513 ... XArray: 6782340 of 6782364 tests passed ``` and exits 0. Running the xarray tests after this change requires a simpler invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ xarray ``` which on failure produces (colors omitted) ``` [09:50:53] ====================== check_reserve ====================== [09:50:53] [FAILED] param-0 [09:50:53] # check_reserve: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_xarray.c:536 [09:50:53] xa_erase(xa, 12345678) != NULL ... [09:50:53] # module: test_xarray [09:50:53] # xarray: pass:26 fail:3 skip:0 total:29 [09:50:53] # Totals: pass:28 fail:3 skip:0 total:31 [09:50:53] ===================== [FAILED] xarray ====================== ``` and exits 1. Use of richer kunit assertions is intentionally omitted to reduce the scope of the change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241205-xarray-kunit-port-v1-1-ee44bc7aa201@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com> Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-12-05 15:11:26 +00:00
xa_alloc_index(test, xa, base + i, GFP_KERNEL);
}
xa_destroy(xa);
/* Check that we fail properly at the limit of allocation */
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_alloc(xa, &id, xa_mk_index(UINT_MAX - 1),
XA_LIMIT(UINT_MAX - 1, UINT_MAX),
GFP_KERNEL) != 0);
XA_BUG_ON(xa, id != 0xfffffffeU);
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_alloc(xa, &id, xa_mk_index(UINT_MAX),
XA_LIMIT(UINT_MAX - 1, UINT_MAX),
GFP_KERNEL) != 0);
XA_BUG_ON(xa, id != 0xffffffffU);
id = 3;
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_alloc(xa, &id, xa_mk_index(0),
XA_LIMIT(UINT_MAX - 1, UINT_MAX),
GFP_KERNEL) != -EBUSY);
XA_BUG_ON(xa, id != 3);
xa_destroy(xa);
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_alloc(xa, &id, xa_mk_index(10), XA_LIMIT(10, 5),
GFP_KERNEL) != -EBUSY);
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_store_index(xa, 3, GFP_KERNEL) != NULL);
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_alloc(xa, &id, xa_mk_index(10), XA_LIMIT(10, 5),
GFP_KERNEL) != -EBUSY);
xarray: port tests to kunit Minimally rewrite the XArray unit tests to use kunit. This integrates nicely with existing kunit tools which produce nicer human-readable output compared to the existing machinery. Running the xarray tests before this change requires an obscure invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ --kconfig_add CONFIG_TEST_XARRAY=y --raw_output=all nothing ``` which on failure produces ``` BUG at check_reserve:513 ... XArray: 6782340 of 6782364 tests passed ``` and exits 0. Running the xarray tests after this change requires a simpler invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ xarray ``` which on failure produces (colors omitted) ``` [09:50:53] ====================== check_reserve ====================== [09:50:53] [FAILED] param-0 [09:50:53] # check_reserve: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_xarray.c:536 [09:50:53] xa_erase(xa, 12345678) != NULL ... [09:50:53] # module: test_xarray [09:50:53] # xarray: pass:26 fail:3 skip:0 total:29 [09:50:53] # Totals: pass:28 fail:3 skip:0 total:31 [09:50:53] ===================== [FAILED] xarray ====================== ``` and exits 1. Use of richer kunit assertions is intentionally omitted to reduce the scope of the change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241205-xarray-kunit-port-v1-1-ee44bc7aa201@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com> Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-12-05 15:11:26 +00:00
xa_erase_index(test, xa, 3);
XA_BUG_ON(xa, !xa_empty(xa));
}
xarray: port tests to kunit Minimally rewrite the XArray unit tests to use kunit. This integrates nicely with existing kunit tools which produce nicer human-readable output compared to the existing machinery. Running the xarray tests before this change requires an obscure invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ --kconfig_add CONFIG_TEST_XARRAY=y --raw_output=all nothing ``` which on failure produces ``` BUG at check_reserve:513 ... XArray: 6782340 of 6782364 tests passed ``` and exits 0. Running the xarray tests after this change requires a simpler invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ xarray ``` which on failure produces (colors omitted) ``` [09:50:53] ====================== check_reserve ====================== [09:50:53] [FAILED] param-0 [09:50:53] # check_reserve: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_xarray.c:536 [09:50:53] xa_erase(xa, 12345678) != NULL ... [09:50:53] # module: test_xarray [09:50:53] # xarray: pass:26 fail:3 skip:0 total:29 [09:50:53] # Totals: pass:28 fail:3 skip:0 total:31 [09:50:53] ===================== [FAILED] xarray ====================== ``` and exits 1. Use of richer kunit assertions is intentionally omitted to reduce the scope of the change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241205-xarray-kunit-port-v1-1-ee44bc7aa201@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com> Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-12-05 15:11:26 +00:00
static noinline void check_xa_alloc_2(struct kunit *test, struct xarray *xa, unsigned int base)
{
unsigned int i, id;
unsigned long index;
void *entry;
/* Allocate and free a NULL and check xa_empty() behaves */
XA_BUG_ON(xa, !xa_empty(xa));
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_alloc(xa, &id, NULL, xa_limit_32b, GFP_KERNEL) != 0);
XA_BUG_ON(xa, id != base);
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_empty(xa));
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_erase(xa, id) != NULL);
XA_BUG_ON(xa, !xa_empty(xa));
/* Ditto, but check destroy instead of erase */
XA_BUG_ON(xa, !xa_empty(xa));
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_alloc(xa, &id, NULL, xa_limit_32b, GFP_KERNEL) != 0);
XA_BUG_ON(xa, id != base);
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_empty(xa));
xa_destroy(xa);
XA_BUG_ON(xa, !xa_empty(xa));
for (i = base; i < base + 10; i++) {
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_alloc(xa, &id, NULL, xa_limit_32b,
GFP_KERNEL) != 0);
XA_BUG_ON(xa, id != i);
}
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_store(xa, 3, xa_mk_index(3), GFP_KERNEL) != NULL);
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_store(xa, 4, xa_mk_index(4), GFP_KERNEL) != NULL);
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_store(xa, 4, NULL, GFP_KERNEL) != xa_mk_index(4));
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_erase(xa, 5) != NULL);
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_alloc(xa, &id, NULL, xa_limit_32b, GFP_KERNEL) != 0);
XA_BUG_ON(xa, id != 5);
xa_for_each(xa, index, entry) {
xarray: port tests to kunit Minimally rewrite the XArray unit tests to use kunit. This integrates nicely with existing kunit tools which produce nicer human-readable output compared to the existing machinery. Running the xarray tests before this change requires an obscure invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ --kconfig_add CONFIG_TEST_XARRAY=y --raw_output=all nothing ``` which on failure produces ``` BUG at check_reserve:513 ... XArray: 6782340 of 6782364 tests passed ``` and exits 0. Running the xarray tests after this change requires a simpler invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ xarray ``` which on failure produces (colors omitted) ``` [09:50:53] ====================== check_reserve ====================== [09:50:53] [FAILED] param-0 [09:50:53] # check_reserve: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_xarray.c:536 [09:50:53] xa_erase(xa, 12345678) != NULL ... [09:50:53] # module: test_xarray [09:50:53] # xarray: pass:26 fail:3 skip:0 total:29 [09:50:53] # Totals: pass:28 fail:3 skip:0 total:31 [09:50:53] ===================== [FAILED] xarray ====================== ``` and exits 1. Use of richer kunit assertions is intentionally omitted to reduce the scope of the change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241205-xarray-kunit-port-v1-1-ee44bc7aa201@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com> Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-12-05 15:11:26 +00:00
xa_erase_index(test, xa, index);
}
for (i = base; i < base + 9; i++) {
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_erase(xa, i) != NULL);
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_empty(xa));
}
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_erase(xa, 8) != NULL);
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_empty(xa));
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_erase(xa, base + 9) != NULL);
XA_BUG_ON(xa, !xa_empty(xa));
xa_destroy(xa);
}
xarray: port tests to kunit Minimally rewrite the XArray unit tests to use kunit. This integrates nicely with existing kunit tools which produce nicer human-readable output compared to the existing machinery. Running the xarray tests before this change requires an obscure invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ --kconfig_add CONFIG_TEST_XARRAY=y --raw_output=all nothing ``` which on failure produces ``` BUG at check_reserve:513 ... XArray: 6782340 of 6782364 tests passed ``` and exits 0. Running the xarray tests after this change requires a simpler invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ xarray ``` which on failure produces (colors omitted) ``` [09:50:53] ====================== check_reserve ====================== [09:50:53] [FAILED] param-0 [09:50:53] # check_reserve: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_xarray.c:536 [09:50:53] xa_erase(xa, 12345678) != NULL ... [09:50:53] # module: test_xarray [09:50:53] # xarray: pass:26 fail:3 skip:0 total:29 [09:50:53] # Totals: pass:28 fail:3 skip:0 total:31 [09:50:53] ===================== [FAILED] xarray ====================== ``` and exits 1. Use of richer kunit assertions is intentionally omitted to reduce the scope of the change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241205-xarray-kunit-port-v1-1-ee44bc7aa201@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com> Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-12-05 15:11:26 +00:00
static noinline void check_xa_alloc_3(struct kunit *test, struct xarray *xa, unsigned int base)
{
struct xa_limit limit = XA_LIMIT(1, 0x3fff);
u32 next = 0;
unsigned int i, id;
unsigned long index;
void *entry;
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_alloc_cyclic(xa, &id, xa_mk_index(1), limit,
&next, GFP_KERNEL) != 0);
XA_BUG_ON(xa, id != 1);
next = 0x3ffd;
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_alloc_cyclic(xa, &id, xa_mk_index(0x3ffd), limit,
&next, GFP_KERNEL) != 0);
XA_BUG_ON(xa, id != 0x3ffd);
xarray: port tests to kunit Minimally rewrite the XArray unit tests to use kunit. This integrates nicely with existing kunit tools which produce nicer human-readable output compared to the existing machinery. Running the xarray tests before this change requires an obscure invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ --kconfig_add CONFIG_TEST_XARRAY=y --raw_output=all nothing ``` which on failure produces ``` BUG at check_reserve:513 ... XArray: 6782340 of 6782364 tests passed ``` and exits 0. Running the xarray tests after this change requires a simpler invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ xarray ``` which on failure produces (colors omitted) ``` [09:50:53] ====================== check_reserve ====================== [09:50:53] [FAILED] param-0 [09:50:53] # check_reserve: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_xarray.c:536 [09:50:53] xa_erase(xa, 12345678) != NULL ... [09:50:53] # module: test_xarray [09:50:53] # xarray: pass:26 fail:3 skip:0 total:29 [09:50:53] # Totals: pass:28 fail:3 skip:0 total:31 [09:50:53] ===================== [FAILED] xarray ====================== ``` and exits 1. Use of richer kunit assertions is intentionally omitted to reduce the scope of the change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241205-xarray-kunit-port-v1-1-ee44bc7aa201@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com> Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-12-05 15:11:26 +00:00
xa_erase_index(test, xa, 0x3ffd);
xa_erase_index(test, xa, 1);
XA_BUG_ON(xa, !xa_empty(xa));
for (i = 0x3ffe; i < 0x4003; i++) {
if (i < 0x4000)
entry = xa_mk_index(i);
else
entry = xa_mk_index(i - 0x3fff);
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_alloc_cyclic(xa, &id, entry, limit,
&next, GFP_KERNEL) != (id == 1));
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_mk_index(id) != entry);
}
/* Check wrap-around is handled correctly */
if (base != 0)
xarray: port tests to kunit Minimally rewrite the XArray unit tests to use kunit. This integrates nicely with existing kunit tools which produce nicer human-readable output compared to the existing machinery. Running the xarray tests before this change requires an obscure invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ --kconfig_add CONFIG_TEST_XARRAY=y --raw_output=all nothing ``` which on failure produces ``` BUG at check_reserve:513 ... XArray: 6782340 of 6782364 tests passed ``` and exits 0. Running the xarray tests after this change requires a simpler invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ xarray ``` which on failure produces (colors omitted) ``` [09:50:53] ====================== check_reserve ====================== [09:50:53] [FAILED] param-0 [09:50:53] # check_reserve: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_xarray.c:536 [09:50:53] xa_erase(xa, 12345678) != NULL ... [09:50:53] # module: test_xarray [09:50:53] # xarray: pass:26 fail:3 skip:0 total:29 [09:50:53] # Totals: pass:28 fail:3 skip:0 total:31 [09:50:53] ===================== [FAILED] xarray ====================== ``` and exits 1. Use of richer kunit assertions is intentionally omitted to reduce the scope of the change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241205-xarray-kunit-port-v1-1-ee44bc7aa201@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com> Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-12-05 15:11:26 +00:00
xa_erase_index(test, xa, base);
xa_erase_index(test, xa, base + 1);
next = UINT_MAX;
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_alloc_cyclic(xa, &id, xa_mk_index(UINT_MAX),
xa_limit_32b, &next, GFP_KERNEL) != 0);
XA_BUG_ON(xa, id != UINT_MAX);
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_alloc_cyclic(xa, &id, xa_mk_index(base),
xa_limit_32b, &next, GFP_KERNEL) != 1);
XA_BUG_ON(xa, id != base);
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_alloc_cyclic(xa, &id, xa_mk_index(base + 1),
xa_limit_32b, &next, GFP_KERNEL) != 0);
XA_BUG_ON(xa, id != base + 1);
xa_for_each(xa, index, entry)
xarray: port tests to kunit Minimally rewrite the XArray unit tests to use kunit. This integrates nicely with existing kunit tools which produce nicer human-readable output compared to the existing machinery. Running the xarray tests before this change requires an obscure invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ --kconfig_add CONFIG_TEST_XARRAY=y --raw_output=all nothing ``` which on failure produces ``` BUG at check_reserve:513 ... XArray: 6782340 of 6782364 tests passed ``` and exits 0. Running the xarray tests after this change requires a simpler invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ xarray ``` which on failure produces (colors omitted) ``` [09:50:53] ====================== check_reserve ====================== [09:50:53] [FAILED] param-0 [09:50:53] # check_reserve: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_xarray.c:536 [09:50:53] xa_erase(xa, 12345678) != NULL ... [09:50:53] # module: test_xarray [09:50:53] # xarray: pass:26 fail:3 skip:0 total:29 [09:50:53] # Totals: pass:28 fail:3 skip:0 total:31 [09:50:53] ===================== [FAILED] xarray ====================== ``` and exits 1. Use of richer kunit assertions is intentionally omitted to reduce the scope of the change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241205-xarray-kunit-port-v1-1-ee44bc7aa201@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com> Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-12-05 15:11:26 +00:00
xa_erase_index(test, xa, index);
XA_BUG_ON(xa, !xa_empty(xa));
}
static DEFINE_XARRAY_ALLOC(xa0);
static DEFINE_XARRAY_ALLOC1(xa1);
xarray: port tests to kunit Minimally rewrite the XArray unit tests to use kunit. This integrates nicely with existing kunit tools which produce nicer human-readable output compared to the existing machinery. Running the xarray tests before this change requires an obscure invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ --kconfig_add CONFIG_TEST_XARRAY=y --raw_output=all nothing ``` which on failure produces ``` BUG at check_reserve:513 ... XArray: 6782340 of 6782364 tests passed ``` and exits 0. Running the xarray tests after this change requires a simpler invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ xarray ``` which on failure produces (colors omitted) ``` [09:50:53] ====================== check_reserve ====================== [09:50:53] [FAILED] param-0 [09:50:53] # check_reserve: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_xarray.c:536 [09:50:53] xa_erase(xa, 12345678) != NULL ... [09:50:53] # module: test_xarray [09:50:53] # xarray: pass:26 fail:3 skip:0 total:29 [09:50:53] # Totals: pass:28 fail:3 skip:0 total:31 [09:50:53] ===================== [FAILED] xarray ====================== ``` and exits 1. Use of richer kunit assertions is intentionally omitted to reduce the scope of the change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241205-xarray-kunit-port-v1-1-ee44bc7aa201@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com> Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-12-05 15:11:26 +00:00
static noinline void check_xa_alloc(struct kunit *test)
{
xarray: port tests to kunit Minimally rewrite the XArray unit tests to use kunit. This integrates nicely with existing kunit tools which produce nicer human-readable output compared to the existing machinery. Running the xarray tests before this change requires an obscure invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ --kconfig_add CONFIG_TEST_XARRAY=y --raw_output=all nothing ``` which on failure produces ``` BUG at check_reserve:513 ... XArray: 6782340 of 6782364 tests passed ``` and exits 0. Running the xarray tests after this change requires a simpler invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ xarray ``` which on failure produces (colors omitted) ``` [09:50:53] ====================== check_reserve ====================== [09:50:53] [FAILED] param-0 [09:50:53] # check_reserve: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_xarray.c:536 [09:50:53] xa_erase(xa, 12345678) != NULL ... [09:50:53] # module: test_xarray [09:50:53] # xarray: pass:26 fail:3 skip:0 total:29 [09:50:53] # Totals: pass:28 fail:3 skip:0 total:31 [09:50:53] ===================== [FAILED] xarray ====================== ``` and exits 1. Use of richer kunit assertions is intentionally omitted to reduce the scope of the change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241205-xarray-kunit-port-v1-1-ee44bc7aa201@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com> Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-12-05 15:11:26 +00:00
check_xa_alloc_1(test, &xa0, 0);
check_xa_alloc_1(test, &xa1, 1);
check_xa_alloc_2(test, &xa0, 0);
check_xa_alloc_2(test, &xa1, 1);
check_xa_alloc_3(test, &xa0, 0);
check_xa_alloc_3(test, &xa1, 1);
}
xarray: port tests to kunit Minimally rewrite the XArray unit tests to use kunit. This integrates nicely with existing kunit tools which produce nicer human-readable output compared to the existing machinery. Running the xarray tests before this change requires an obscure invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ --kconfig_add CONFIG_TEST_XARRAY=y --raw_output=all nothing ``` which on failure produces ``` BUG at check_reserve:513 ... XArray: 6782340 of 6782364 tests passed ``` and exits 0. Running the xarray tests after this change requires a simpler invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ xarray ``` which on failure produces (colors omitted) ``` [09:50:53] ====================== check_reserve ====================== [09:50:53] [FAILED] param-0 [09:50:53] # check_reserve: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_xarray.c:536 [09:50:53] xa_erase(xa, 12345678) != NULL ... [09:50:53] # module: test_xarray [09:50:53] # xarray: pass:26 fail:3 skip:0 total:29 [09:50:53] # Totals: pass:28 fail:3 skip:0 total:31 [09:50:53] ===================== [FAILED] xarray ====================== ``` and exits 1. Use of richer kunit assertions is intentionally omitted to reduce the scope of the change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241205-xarray-kunit-port-v1-1-ee44bc7aa201@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com> Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-12-05 15:11:26 +00:00
static noinline void __check_store_iter(struct kunit *test, unsigned long start,
unsigned int order, unsigned int present)
{
xarray: port tests to kunit Minimally rewrite the XArray unit tests to use kunit. This integrates nicely with existing kunit tools which produce nicer human-readable output compared to the existing machinery. Running the xarray tests before this change requires an obscure invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ --kconfig_add CONFIG_TEST_XARRAY=y --raw_output=all nothing ``` which on failure produces ``` BUG at check_reserve:513 ... XArray: 6782340 of 6782364 tests passed ``` and exits 0. Running the xarray tests after this change requires a simpler invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ xarray ``` which on failure produces (colors omitted) ``` [09:50:53] ====================== check_reserve ====================== [09:50:53] [FAILED] param-0 [09:50:53] # check_reserve: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_xarray.c:536 [09:50:53] xa_erase(xa, 12345678) != NULL ... [09:50:53] # module: test_xarray [09:50:53] # xarray: pass:26 fail:3 skip:0 total:29 [09:50:53] # Totals: pass:28 fail:3 skip:0 total:31 [09:50:53] ===================== [FAILED] xarray ====================== ``` and exits 1. Use of richer kunit assertions is intentionally omitted to reduce the scope of the change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241205-xarray-kunit-port-v1-1-ee44bc7aa201@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com> Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-12-05 15:11:26 +00:00
struct xarray *xa = xa_param(test);
XA_STATE_ORDER(xas, xa, start, order);
void *entry;
unsigned int count = 0;
retry:
xas_lock(&xas);
xas_for_each_conflict(&xas, entry) {
XA_BUG_ON(xa, !xa_is_value(entry));
XA_BUG_ON(xa, entry < xa_mk_index(start));
XA_BUG_ON(xa, entry > xa_mk_index(start + (1UL << order) - 1));
count++;
}
xas_store(&xas, xa_mk_index(start));
xas_unlock(&xas);
if (xas_nomem(&xas, GFP_KERNEL)) {
count = 0;
goto retry;
}
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xas_error(&xas));
XA_BUG_ON(xa, count != present);
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_load(xa, start) != xa_mk_index(start));
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_load(xa, start + (1UL << order) - 1) !=
xa_mk_index(start));
xarray: port tests to kunit Minimally rewrite the XArray unit tests to use kunit. This integrates nicely with existing kunit tools which produce nicer human-readable output compared to the existing machinery. Running the xarray tests before this change requires an obscure invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ --kconfig_add CONFIG_TEST_XARRAY=y --raw_output=all nothing ``` which on failure produces ``` BUG at check_reserve:513 ... XArray: 6782340 of 6782364 tests passed ``` and exits 0. Running the xarray tests after this change requires a simpler invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ xarray ``` which on failure produces (colors omitted) ``` [09:50:53] ====================== check_reserve ====================== [09:50:53] [FAILED] param-0 [09:50:53] # check_reserve: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_xarray.c:536 [09:50:53] xa_erase(xa, 12345678) != NULL ... [09:50:53] # module: test_xarray [09:50:53] # xarray: pass:26 fail:3 skip:0 total:29 [09:50:53] # Totals: pass:28 fail:3 skip:0 total:31 [09:50:53] ===================== [FAILED] xarray ====================== ``` and exits 1. Use of richer kunit assertions is intentionally omitted to reduce the scope of the change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241205-xarray-kunit-port-v1-1-ee44bc7aa201@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com> Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-12-05 15:11:26 +00:00
xa_erase_index(test, xa, start);
}
xarray: port tests to kunit Minimally rewrite the XArray unit tests to use kunit. This integrates nicely with existing kunit tools which produce nicer human-readable output compared to the existing machinery. Running the xarray tests before this change requires an obscure invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ --kconfig_add CONFIG_TEST_XARRAY=y --raw_output=all nothing ``` which on failure produces ``` BUG at check_reserve:513 ... XArray: 6782340 of 6782364 tests passed ``` and exits 0. Running the xarray tests after this change requires a simpler invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ xarray ``` which on failure produces (colors omitted) ``` [09:50:53] ====================== check_reserve ====================== [09:50:53] [FAILED] param-0 [09:50:53] # check_reserve: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_xarray.c:536 [09:50:53] xa_erase(xa, 12345678) != NULL ... [09:50:53] # module: test_xarray [09:50:53] # xarray: pass:26 fail:3 skip:0 total:29 [09:50:53] # Totals: pass:28 fail:3 skip:0 total:31 [09:50:53] ===================== [FAILED] xarray ====================== ``` and exits 1. Use of richer kunit assertions is intentionally omitted to reduce the scope of the change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241205-xarray-kunit-port-v1-1-ee44bc7aa201@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com> Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-12-05 15:11:26 +00:00
static noinline void check_store_iter(struct kunit *test)
{
xarray: port tests to kunit Minimally rewrite the XArray unit tests to use kunit. This integrates nicely with existing kunit tools which produce nicer human-readable output compared to the existing machinery. Running the xarray tests before this change requires an obscure invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ --kconfig_add CONFIG_TEST_XARRAY=y --raw_output=all nothing ``` which on failure produces ``` BUG at check_reserve:513 ... XArray: 6782340 of 6782364 tests passed ``` and exits 0. Running the xarray tests after this change requires a simpler invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ xarray ``` which on failure produces (colors omitted) ``` [09:50:53] ====================== check_reserve ====================== [09:50:53] [FAILED] param-0 [09:50:53] # check_reserve: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_xarray.c:536 [09:50:53] xa_erase(xa, 12345678) != NULL ... [09:50:53] # module: test_xarray [09:50:53] # xarray: pass:26 fail:3 skip:0 total:29 [09:50:53] # Totals: pass:28 fail:3 skip:0 total:31 [09:50:53] ===================== [FAILED] xarray ====================== ``` and exits 1. Use of richer kunit assertions is intentionally omitted to reduce the scope of the change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241205-xarray-kunit-port-v1-1-ee44bc7aa201@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com> Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-12-05 15:11:26 +00:00
struct xarray *xa = xa_param(test);
unsigned int i, j;
unsigned int max_order = IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_XARRAY_MULTI) ? 20 : 1;
for (i = 0; i < max_order; i++) {
unsigned int min = 1 << i;
unsigned int max = (2 << i) - 1;
xarray: port tests to kunit Minimally rewrite the XArray unit tests to use kunit. This integrates nicely with existing kunit tools which produce nicer human-readable output compared to the existing machinery. Running the xarray tests before this change requires an obscure invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ --kconfig_add CONFIG_TEST_XARRAY=y --raw_output=all nothing ``` which on failure produces ``` BUG at check_reserve:513 ... XArray: 6782340 of 6782364 tests passed ``` and exits 0. Running the xarray tests after this change requires a simpler invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ xarray ``` which on failure produces (colors omitted) ``` [09:50:53] ====================== check_reserve ====================== [09:50:53] [FAILED] param-0 [09:50:53] # check_reserve: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_xarray.c:536 [09:50:53] xa_erase(xa, 12345678) != NULL ... [09:50:53] # module: test_xarray [09:50:53] # xarray: pass:26 fail:3 skip:0 total:29 [09:50:53] # Totals: pass:28 fail:3 skip:0 total:31 [09:50:53] ===================== [FAILED] xarray ====================== ``` and exits 1. Use of richer kunit assertions is intentionally omitted to reduce the scope of the change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241205-xarray-kunit-port-v1-1-ee44bc7aa201@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com> Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-12-05 15:11:26 +00:00
__check_store_iter(test, 0, i, 0);
XA_BUG_ON(xa, !xa_empty(xa));
xarray: port tests to kunit Minimally rewrite the XArray unit tests to use kunit. This integrates nicely with existing kunit tools which produce nicer human-readable output compared to the existing machinery. Running the xarray tests before this change requires an obscure invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ --kconfig_add CONFIG_TEST_XARRAY=y --raw_output=all nothing ``` which on failure produces ``` BUG at check_reserve:513 ... XArray: 6782340 of 6782364 tests passed ``` and exits 0. Running the xarray tests after this change requires a simpler invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ xarray ``` which on failure produces (colors omitted) ``` [09:50:53] ====================== check_reserve ====================== [09:50:53] [FAILED] param-0 [09:50:53] # check_reserve: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_xarray.c:536 [09:50:53] xa_erase(xa, 12345678) != NULL ... [09:50:53] # module: test_xarray [09:50:53] # xarray: pass:26 fail:3 skip:0 total:29 [09:50:53] # Totals: pass:28 fail:3 skip:0 total:31 [09:50:53] ===================== [FAILED] xarray ====================== ``` and exits 1. Use of richer kunit assertions is intentionally omitted to reduce the scope of the change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241205-xarray-kunit-port-v1-1-ee44bc7aa201@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com> Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-12-05 15:11:26 +00:00
__check_store_iter(test, min, i, 0);
XA_BUG_ON(xa, !xa_empty(xa));
xa_store_index(xa, min, GFP_KERNEL);
xarray: port tests to kunit Minimally rewrite the XArray unit tests to use kunit. This integrates nicely with existing kunit tools which produce nicer human-readable output compared to the existing machinery. Running the xarray tests before this change requires an obscure invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ --kconfig_add CONFIG_TEST_XARRAY=y --raw_output=all nothing ``` which on failure produces ``` BUG at check_reserve:513 ... XArray: 6782340 of 6782364 tests passed ``` and exits 0. Running the xarray tests after this change requires a simpler invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ xarray ``` which on failure produces (colors omitted) ``` [09:50:53] ====================== check_reserve ====================== [09:50:53] [FAILED] param-0 [09:50:53] # check_reserve: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_xarray.c:536 [09:50:53] xa_erase(xa, 12345678) != NULL ... [09:50:53] # module: test_xarray [09:50:53] # xarray: pass:26 fail:3 skip:0 total:29 [09:50:53] # Totals: pass:28 fail:3 skip:0 total:31 [09:50:53] ===================== [FAILED] xarray ====================== ``` and exits 1. Use of richer kunit assertions is intentionally omitted to reduce the scope of the change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241205-xarray-kunit-port-v1-1-ee44bc7aa201@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com> Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-12-05 15:11:26 +00:00
__check_store_iter(test, min, i, 1);
XA_BUG_ON(xa, !xa_empty(xa));
xa_store_index(xa, max, GFP_KERNEL);
xarray: port tests to kunit Minimally rewrite the XArray unit tests to use kunit. This integrates nicely with existing kunit tools which produce nicer human-readable output compared to the existing machinery. Running the xarray tests before this change requires an obscure invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ --kconfig_add CONFIG_TEST_XARRAY=y --raw_output=all nothing ``` which on failure produces ``` BUG at check_reserve:513 ... XArray: 6782340 of 6782364 tests passed ``` and exits 0. Running the xarray tests after this change requires a simpler invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ xarray ``` which on failure produces (colors omitted) ``` [09:50:53] ====================== check_reserve ====================== [09:50:53] [FAILED] param-0 [09:50:53] # check_reserve: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_xarray.c:536 [09:50:53] xa_erase(xa, 12345678) != NULL ... [09:50:53] # module: test_xarray [09:50:53] # xarray: pass:26 fail:3 skip:0 total:29 [09:50:53] # Totals: pass:28 fail:3 skip:0 total:31 [09:50:53] ===================== [FAILED] xarray ====================== ``` and exits 1. Use of richer kunit assertions is intentionally omitted to reduce the scope of the change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241205-xarray-kunit-port-v1-1-ee44bc7aa201@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com> Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-12-05 15:11:26 +00:00
__check_store_iter(test, min, i, 1);
XA_BUG_ON(xa, !xa_empty(xa));
for (j = 0; j < min; j++)
xa_store_index(xa, j, GFP_KERNEL);
xarray: port tests to kunit Minimally rewrite the XArray unit tests to use kunit. This integrates nicely with existing kunit tools which produce nicer human-readable output compared to the existing machinery. Running the xarray tests before this change requires an obscure invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ --kconfig_add CONFIG_TEST_XARRAY=y --raw_output=all nothing ``` which on failure produces ``` BUG at check_reserve:513 ... XArray: 6782340 of 6782364 tests passed ``` and exits 0. Running the xarray tests after this change requires a simpler invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ xarray ``` which on failure produces (colors omitted) ``` [09:50:53] ====================== check_reserve ====================== [09:50:53] [FAILED] param-0 [09:50:53] # check_reserve: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_xarray.c:536 [09:50:53] xa_erase(xa, 12345678) != NULL ... [09:50:53] # module: test_xarray [09:50:53] # xarray: pass:26 fail:3 skip:0 total:29 [09:50:53] # Totals: pass:28 fail:3 skip:0 total:31 [09:50:53] ===================== [FAILED] xarray ====================== ``` and exits 1. Use of richer kunit assertions is intentionally omitted to reduce the scope of the change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241205-xarray-kunit-port-v1-1-ee44bc7aa201@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com> Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-12-05 15:11:26 +00:00
__check_store_iter(test, 0, i, min);
XA_BUG_ON(xa, !xa_empty(xa));
for (j = 0; j < min; j++)
xa_store_index(xa, min + j, GFP_KERNEL);
xarray: port tests to kunit Minimally rewrite the XArray unit tests to use kunit. This integrates nicely with existing kunit tools which produce nicer human-readable output compared to the existing machinery. Running the xarray tests before this change requires an obscure invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ --kconfig_add CONFIG_TEST_XARRAY=y --raw_output=all nothing ``` which on failure produces ``` BUG at check_reserve:513 ... XArray: 6782340 of 6782364 tests passed ``` and exits 0. Running the xarray tests after this change requires a simpler invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ xarray ``` which on failure produces (colors omitted) ``` [09:50:53] ====================== check_reserve ====================== [09:50:53] [FAILED] param-0 [09:50:53] # check_reserve: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_xarray.c:536 [09:50:53] xa_erase(xa, 12345678) != NULL ... [09:50:53] # module: test_xarray [09:50:53] # xarray: pass:26 fail:3 skip:0 total:29 [09:50:53] # Totals: pass:28 fail:3 skip:0 total:31 [09:50:53] ===================== [FAILED] xarray ====================== ``` and exits 1. Use of richer kunit assertions is intentionally omitted to reduce the scope of the change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241205-xarray-kunit-port-v1-1-ee44bc7aa201@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com> Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-12-05 15:11:26 +00:00
__check_store_iter(test, min, i, min);
XA_BUG_ON(xa, !xa_empty(xa));
}
#ifdef CONFIG_XARRAY_MULTI
xa_store_index(xa, 63, GFP_KERNEL);
xa_store_index(xa, 65, GFP_KERNEL);
xarray: port tests to kunit Minimally rewrite the XArray unit tests to use kunit. This integrates nicely with existing kunit tools which produce nicer human-readable output compared to the existing machinery. Running the xarray tests before this change requires an obscure invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ --kconfig_add CONFIG_TEST_XARRAY=y --raw_output=all nothing ``` which on failure produces ``` BUG at check_reserve:513 ... XArray: 6782340 of 6782364 tests passed ``` and exits 0. Running the xarray tests after this change requires a simpler invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ xarray ``` which on failure produces (colors omitted) ``` [09:50:53] ====================== check_reserve ====================== [09:50:53] [FAILED] param-0 [09:50:53] # check_reserve: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_xarray.c:536 [09:50:53] xa_erase(xa, 12345678) != NULL ... [09:50:53] # module: test_xarray [09:50:53] # xarray: pass:26 fail:3 skip:0 total:29 [09:50:53] # Totals: pass:28 fail:3 skip:0 total:31 [09:50:53] ===================== [FAILED] xarray ====================== ``` and exits 1. Use of richer kunit assertions is intentionally omitted to reduce the scope of the change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241205-xarray-kunit-port-v1-1-ee44bc7aa201@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com> Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-12-05 15:11:26 +00:00
__check_store_iter(test, 64, 2, 1);
xa_erase_index(test, xa, 63);
#endif
XA_BUG_ON(xa, !xa_empty(xa));
}
xarray: port tests to kunit Minimally rewrite the XArray unit tests to use kunit. This integrates nicely with existing kunit tools which produce nicer human-readable output compared to the existing machinery. Running the xarray tests before this change requires an obscure invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ --kconfig_add CONFIG_TEST_XARRAY=y --raw_output=all nothing ``` which on failure produces ``` BUG at check_reserve:513 ... XArray: 6782340 of 6782364 tests passed ``` and exits 0. Running the xarray tests after this change requires a simpler invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ xarray ``` which on failure produces (colors omitted) ``` [09:50:53] ====================== check_reserve ====================== [09:50:53] [FAILED] param-0 [09:50:53] # check_reserve: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_xarray.c:536 [09:50:53] xa_erase(xa, 12345678) != NULL ... [09:50:53] # module: test_xarray [09:50:53] # xarray: pass:26 fail:3 skip:0 total:29 [09:50:53] # Totals: pass:28 fail:3 skip:0 total:31 [09:50:53] ===================== [FAILED] xarray ====================== ``` and exits 1. Use of richer kunit assertions is intentionally omitted to reduce the scope of the change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241205-xarray-kunit-port-v1-1-ee44bc7aa201@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com> Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-12-05 15:11:26 +00:00
static noinline void check_multi_find_1(struct kunit *test, unsigned int order)
{
#ifdef CONFIG_XARRAY_MULTI
xarray: port tests to kunit Minimally rewrite the XArray unit tests to use kunit. This integrates nicely with existing kunit tools which produce nicer human-readable output compared to the existing machinery. Running the xarray tests before this change requires an obscure invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ --kconfig_add CONFIG_TEST_XARRAY=y --raw_output=all nothing ``` which on failure produces ``` BUG at check_reserve:513 ... XArray: 6782340 of 6782364 tests passed ``` and exits 0. Running the xarray tests after this change requires a simpler invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ xarray ``` which on failure produces (colors omitted) ``` [09:50:53] ====================== check_reserve ====================== [09:50:53] [FAILED] param-0 [09:50:53] # check_reserve: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_xarray.c:536 [09:50:53] xa_erase(xa, 12345678) != NULL ... [09:50:53] # module: test_xarray [09:50:53] # xarray: pass:26 fail:3 skip:0 total:29 [09:50:53] # Totals: pass:28 fail:3 skip:0 total:31 [09:50:53] ===================== [FAILED] xarray ====================== ``` and exits 1. Use of richer kunit assertions is intentionally omitted to reduce the scope of the change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241205-xarray-kunit-port-v1-1-ee44bc7aa201@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com> Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-12-05 15:11:26 +00:00
struct xarray *xa = xa_param(test);
unsigned long multi = 3 << order;
unsigned long next = 4 << order;
unsigned long index;
xa_store_order(xa, multi, order, xa_mk_value(multi), GFP_KERNEL);
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_store_index(xa, next, GFP_KERNEL) != NULL);
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_store_index(xa, next + 1, GFP_KERNEL) != NULL);
index = 0;
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_find(xa, &index, ULONG_MAX, XA_PRESENT) !=
xa_mk_value(multi));
XA_BUG_ON(xa, index != multi);
index = multi + 1;
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_find(xa, &index, ULONG_MAX, XA_PRESENT) !=
xa_mk_value(multi));
XA_BUG_ON(xa, (index < multi) || (index >= next));
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_find_after(xa, &index, ULONG_MAX, XA_PRESENT) !=
xa_mk_value(next));
XA_BUG_ON(xa, index != next);
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_find_after(xa, &index, next, XA_PRESENT) != NULL);
XA_BUG_ON(xa, index != next);
xarray: port tests to kunit Minimally rewrite the XArray unit tests to use kunit. This integrates nicely with existing kunit tools which produce nicer human-readable output compared to the existing machinery. Running the xarray tests before this change requires an obscure invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ --kconfig_add CONFIG_TEST_XARRAY=y --raw_output=all nothing ``` which on failure produces ``` BUG at check_reserve:513 ... XArray: 6782340 of 6782364 tests passed ``` and exits 0. Running the xarray tests after this change requires a simpler invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ xarray ``` which on failure produces (colors omitted) ``` [09:50:53] ====================== check_reserve ====================== [09:50:53] [FAILED] param-0 [09:50:53] # check_reserve: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_xarray.c:536 [09:50:53] xa_erase(xa, 12345678) != NULL ... [09:50:53] # module: test_xarray [09:50:53] # xarray: pass:26 fail:3 skip:0 total:29 [09:50:53] # Totals: pass:28 fail:3 skip:0 total:31 [09:50:53] ===================== [FAILED] xarray ====================== ``` and exits 1. Use of richer kunit assertions is intentionally omitted to reduce the scope of the change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241205-xarray-kunit-port-v1-1-ee44bc7aa201@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com> Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-12-05 15:11:26 +00:00
xa_erase_index(test, xa, multi);
xa_erase_index(test, xa, next);
xa_erase_index(test, xa, next + 1);
XA_BUG_ON(xa, !xa_empty(xa));
#endif
}
xarray: port tests to kunit Minimally rewrite the XArray unit tests to use kunit. This integrates nicely with existing kunit tools which produce nicer human-readable output compared to the existing machinery. Running the xarray tests before this change requires an obscure invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ --kconfig_add CONFIG_TEST_XARRAY=y --raw_output=all nothing ``` which on failure produces ``` BUG at check_reserve:513 ... XArray: 6782340 of 6782364 tests passed ``` and exits 0. Running the xarray tests after this change requires a simpler invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ xarray ``` which on failure produces (colors omitted) ``` [09:50:53] ====================== check_reserve ====================== [09:50:53] [FAILED] param-0 [09:50:53] # check_reserve: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_xarray.c:536 [09:50:53] xa_erase(xa, 12345678) != NULL ... [09:50:53] # module: test_xarray [09:50:53] # xarray: pass:26 fail:3 skip:0 total:29 [09:50:53] # Totals: pass:28 fail:3 skip:0 total:31 [09:50:53] ===================== [FAILED] xarray ====================== ``` and exits 1. Use of richer kunit assertions is intentionally omitted to reduce the scope of the change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241205-xarray-kunit-port-v1-1-ee44bc7aa201@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com> Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-12-05 15:11:26 +00:00
static noinline void check_multi_find_2(struct kunit *test)
{
xarray: port tests to kunit Minimally rewrite the XArray unit tests to use kunit. This integrates nicely with existing kunit tools which produce nicer human-readable output compared to the existing machinery. Running the xarray tests before this change requires an obscure invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ --kconfig_add CONFIG_TEST_XARRAY=y --raw_output=all nothing ``` which on failure produces ``` BUG at check_reserve:513 ... XArray: 6782340 of 6782364 tests passed ``` and exits 0. Running the xarray tests after this change requires a simpler invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ xarray ``` which on failure produces (colors omitted) ``` [09:50:53] ====================== check_reserve ====================== [09:50:53] [FAILED] param-0 [09:50:53] # check_reserve: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_xarray.c:536 [09:50:53] xa_erase(xa, 12345678) != NULL ... [09:50:53] # module: test_xarray [09:50:53] # xarray: pass:26 fail:3 skip:0 total:29 [09:50:53] # Totals: pass:28 fail:3 skip:0 total:31 [09:50:53] ===================== [FAILED] xarray ====================== ``` and exits 1. Use of richer kunit assertions is intentionally omitted to reduce the scope of the change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241205-xarray-kunit-port-v1-1-ee44bc7aa201@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com> Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-12-05 15:11:26 +00:00
struct xarray *xa = xa_param(test);
unsigned int max_order = IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_XARRAY_MULTI) ? 10 : 1;
unsigned int i, j;
void *entry;
for (i = 0; i < max_order; i++) {
unsigned long index = 1UL << i;
for (j = 0; j < index; j++) {
XA_STATE(xas, xa, j + index);
xa_store_index(xa, index - 1, GFP_KERNEL);
xa_store_order(xa, index, i, xa_mk_index(index),
GFP_KERNEL);
rcu_read_lock();
xas_for_each(&xas, entry, ULONG_MAX) {
xarray: port tests to kunit Minimally rewrite the XArray unit tests to use kunit. This integrates nicely with existing kunit tools which produce nicer human-readable output compared to the existing machinery. Running the xarray tests before this change requires an obscure invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ --kconfig_add CONFIG_TEST_XARRAY=y --raw_output=all nothing ``` which on failure produces ``` BUG at check_reserve:513 ... XArray: 6782340 of 6782364 tests passed ``` and exits 0. Running the xarray tests after this change requires a simpler invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ xarray ``` which on failure produces (colors omitted) ``` [09:50:53] ====================== check_reserve ====================== [09:50:53] [FAILED] param-0 [09:50:53] # check_reserve: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_xarray.c:536 [09:50:53] xa_erase(xa, 12345678) != NULL ... [09:50:53] # module: test_xarray [09:50:53] # xarray: pass:26 fail:3 skip:0 total:29 [09:50:53] # Totals: pass:28 fail:3 skip:0 total:31 [09:50:53] ===================== [FAILED] xarray ====================== ``` and exits 1. Use of richer kunit assertions is intentionally omitted to reduce the scope of the change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241205-xarray-kunit-port-v1-1-ee44bc7aa201@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com> Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-12-05 15:11:26 +00:00
xa_erase_index(test, xa, index);
}
rcu_read_unlock();
xarray: port tests to kunit Minimally rewrite the XArray unit tests to use kunit. This integrates nicely with existing kunit tools which produce nicer human-readable output compared to the existing machinery. Running the xarray tests before this change requires an obscure invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ --kconfig_add CONFIG_TEST_XARRAY=y --raw_output=all nothing ``` which on failure produces ``` BUG at check_reserve:513 ... XArray: 6782340 of 6782364 tests passed ``` and exits 0. Running the xarray tests after this change requires a simpler invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ xarray ``` which on failure produces (colors omitted) ``` [09:50:53] ====================== check_reserve ====================== [09:50:53] [FAILED] param-0 [09:50:53] # check_reserve: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_xarray.c:536 [09:50:53] xa_erase(xa, 12345678) != NULL ... [09:50:53] # module: test_xarray [09:50:53] # xarray: pass:26 fail:3 skip:0 total:29 [09:50:53] # Totals: pass:28 fail:3 skip:0 total:31 [09:50:53] ===================== [FAILED] xarray ====================== ``` and exits 1. Use of richer kunit assertions is intentionally omitted to reduce the scope of the change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241205-xarray-kunit-port-v1-1-ee44bc7aa201@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com> Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-12-05 15:11:26 +00:00
xa_erase_index(test, xa, index - 1);
XA_BUG_ON(xa, !xa_empty(xa));
}
}
}
xarray: port tests to kunit Minimally rewrite the XArray unit tests to use kunit. This integrates nicely with existing kunit tools which produce nicer human-readable output compared to the existing machinery. Running the xarray tests before this change requires an obscure invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ --kconfig_add CONFIG_TEST_XARRAY=y --raw_output=all nothing ``` which on failure produces ``` BUG at check_reserve:513 ... XArray: 6782340 of 6782364 tests passed ``` and exits 0. Running the xarray tests after this change requires a simpler invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ xarray ``` which on failure produces (colors omitted) ``` [09:50:53] ====================== check_reserve ====================== [09:50:53] [FAILED] param-0 [09:50:53] # check_reserve: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_xarray.c:536 [09:50:53] xa_erase(xa, 12345678) != NULL ... [09:50:53] # module: test_xarray [09:50:53] # xarray: pass:26 fail:3 skip:0 total:29 [09:50:53] # Totals: pass:28 fail:3 skip:0 total:31 [09:50:53] ===================== [FAILED] xarray ====================== ``` and exits 1. Use of richer kunit assertions is intentionally omitted to reduce the scope of the change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241205-xarray-kunit-port-v1-1-ee44bc7aa201@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com> Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-12-05 15:11:26 +00:00
static noinline void check_multi_find_3(struct kunit *test)
{
xarray: port tests to kunit Minimally rewrite the XArray unit tests to use kunit. This integrates nicely with existing kunit tools which produce nicer human-readable output compared to the existing machinery. Running the xarray tests before this change requires an obscure invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ --kconfig_add CONFIG_TEST_XARRAY=y --raw_output=all nothing ``` which on failure produces ``` BUG at check_reserve:513 ... XArray: 6782340 of 6782364 tests passed ``` and exits 0. Running the xarray tests after this change requires a simpler invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ xarray ``` which on failure produces (colors omitted) ``` [09:50:53] ====================== check_reserve ====================== [09:50:53] [FAILED] param-0 [09:50:53] # check_reserve: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_xarray.c:536 [09:50:53] xa_erase(xa, 12345678) != NULL ... [09:50:53] # module: test_xarray [09:50:53] # xarray: pass:26 fail:3 skip:0 total:29 [09:50:53] # Totals: pass:28 fail:3 skip:0 total:31 [09:50:53] ===================== [FAILED] xarray ====================== ``` and exits 1. Use of richer kunit assertions is intentionally omitted to reduce the scope of the change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241205-xarray-kunit-port-v1-1-ee44bc7aa201@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com> Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-12-05 15:11:26 +00:00
struct xarray *xa = xa_param(test);
unsigned int order;
for (order = 5; order < order_limit; order++) {
unsigned long index = 1UL << (order - 5);
XA_BUG_ON(xa, !xa_empty(xa));
xa_store_order(xa, 0, order - 4, xa_mk_index(0), GFP_KERNEL);
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_find_after(xa, &index, ULONG_MAX, XA_PRESENT));
xarray: port tests to kunit Minimally rewrite the XArray unit tests to use kunit. This integrates nicely with existing kunit tools which produce nicer human-readable output compared to the existing machinery. Running the xarray tests before this change requires an obscure invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ --kconfig_add CONFIG_TEST_XARRAY=y --raw_output=all nothing ``` which on failure produces ``` BUG at check_reserve:513 ... XArray: 6782340 of 6782364 tests passed ``` and exits 0. Running the xarray tests after this change requires a simpler invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ xarray ``` which on failure produces (colors omitted) ``` [09:50:53] ====================== check_reserve ====================== [09:50:53] [FAILED] param-0 [09:50:53] # check_reserve: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_xarray.c:536 [09:50:53] xa_erase(xa, 12345678) != NULL ... [09:50:53] # module: test_xarray [09:50:53] # xarray: pass:26 fail:3 skip:0 total:29 [09:50:53] # Totals: pass:28 fail:3 skip:0 total:31 [09:50:53] ===================== [FAILED] xarray ====================== ``` and exits 1. Use of richer kunit assertions is intentionally omitted to reduce the scope of the change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241205-xarray-kunit-port-v1-1-ee44bc7aa201@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com> Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-12-05 15:11:26 +00:00
xa_erase_index(test, xa, 0);
}
}
xarray: port tests to kunit Minimally rewrite the XArray unit tests to use kunit. This integrates nicely with existing kunit tools which produce nicer human-readable output compared to the existing machinery. Running the xarray tests before this change requires an obscure invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ --kconfig_add CONFIG_TEST_XARRAY=y --raw_output=all nothing ``` which on failure produces ``` BUG at check_reserve:513 ... XArray: 6782340 of 6782364 tests passed ``` and exits 0. Running the xarray tests after this change requires a simpler invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ xarray ``` which on failure produces (colors omitted) ``` [09:50:53] ====================== check_reserve ====================== [09:50:53] [FAILED] param-0 [09:50:53] # check_reserve: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_xarray.c:536 [09:50:53] xa_erase(xa, 12345678) != NULL ... [09:50:53] # module: test_xarray [09:50:53] # xarray: pass:26 fail:3 skip:0 total:29 [09:50:53] # Totals: pass:28 fail:3 skip:0 total:31 [09:50:53] ===================== [FAILED] xarray ====================== ``` and exits 1. Use of richer kunit assertions is intentionally omitted to reduce the scope of the change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241205-xarray-kunit-port-v1-1-ee44bc7aa201@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com> Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-12-05 15:11:26 +00:00
static noinline void check_find_1(struct kunit *test)
{
xarray: port tests to kunit Minimally rewrite the XArray unit tests to use kunit. This integrates nicely with existing kunit tools which produce nicer human-readable output compared to the existing machinery. Running the xarray tests before this change requires an obscure invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ --kconfig_add CONFIG_TEST_XARRAY=y --raw_output=all nothing ``` which on failure produces ``` BUG at check_reserve:513 ... XArray: 6782340 of 6782364 tests passed ``` and exits 0. Running the xarray tests after this change requires a simpler invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ xarray ``` which on failure produces (colors omitted) ``` [09:50:53] ====================== check_reserve ====================== [09:50:53] [FAILED] param-0 [09:50:53] # check_reserve: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_xarray.c:536 [09:50:53] xa_erase(xa, 12345678) != NULL ... [09:50:53] # module: test_xarray [09:50:53] # xarray: pass:26 fail:3 skip:0 total:29 [09:50:53] # Totals: pass:28 fail:3 skip:0 total:31 [09:50:53] ===================== [FAILED] xarray ====================== ``` and exits 1. Use of richer kunit assertions is intentionally omitted to reduce the scope of the change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241205-xarray-kunit-port-v1-1-ee44bc7aa201@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com> Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-12-05 15:11:26 +00:00
struct xarray *xa = xa_param(test);
unsigned long i, j, k;
XA_BUG_ON(xa, !xa_empty(xa));
/*
* Check xa_find with all pairs between 0 and 99 inclusive,
* starting at every index between 0 and 99
*/
for (i = 0; i < 100; i++) {
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_store_index(xa, i, GFP_KERNEL) != NULL);
xa_set_mark(xa, i, XA_MARK_0);
for (j = 0; j < i; j++) {
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_store_index(xa, j, GFP_KERNEL) !=
NULL);
xa_set_mark(xa, j, XA_MARK_0);
for (k = 0; k < 100; k++) {
unsigned long index = k;
void *entry = xa_find(xa, &index, ULONG_MAX,
XA_PRESENT);
if (k <= j)
XA_BUG_ON(xa, index != j);
else if (k <= i)
XA_BUG_ON(xa, index != i);
else
XA_BUG_ON(xa, entry != NULL);
index = k;
entry = xa_find(xa, &index, ULONG_MAX,
XA_MARK_0);
if (k <= j)
XA_BUG_ON(xa, index != j);
else if (k <= i)
XA_BUG_ON(xa, index != i);
else
XA_BUG_ON(xa, entry != NULL);
}
xarray: port tests to kunit Minimally rewrite the XArray unit tests to use kunit. This integrates nicely with existing kunit tools which produce nicer human-readable output compared to the existing machinery. Running the xarray tests before this change requires an obscure invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ --kconfig_add CONFIG_TEST_XARRAY=y --raw_output=all nothing ``` which on failure produces ``` BUG at check_reserve:513 ... XArray: 6782340 of 6782364 tests passed ``` and exits 0. Running the xarray tests after this change requires a simpler invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ xarray ``` which on failure produces (colors omitted) ``` [09:50:53] ====================== check_reserve ====================== [09:50:53] [FAILED] param-0 [09:50:53] # check_reserve: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_xarray.c:536 [09:50:53] xa_erase(xa, 12345678) != NULL ... [09:50:53] # module: test_xarray [09:50:53] # xarray: pass:26 fail:3 skip:0 total:29 [09:50:53] # Totals: pass:28 fail:3 skip:0 total:31 [09:50:53] ===================== [FAILED] xarray ====================== ``` and exits 1. Use of richer kunit assertions is intentionally omitted to reduce the scope of the change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241205-xarray-kunit-port-v1-1-ee44bc7aa201@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com> Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-12-05 15:11:26 +00:00
xa_erase_index(test, xa, j);
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_get_mark(xa, j, XA_MARK_0));
XA_BUG_ON(xa, !xa_get_mark(xa, i, XA_MARK_0));
}
xarray: port tests to kunit Minimally rewrite the XArray unit tests to use kunit. This integrates nicely with existing kunit tools which produce nicer human-readable output compared to the existing machinery. Running the xarray tests before this change requires an obscure invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ --kconfig_add CONFIG_TEST_XARRAY=y --raw_output=all nothing ``` which on failure produces ``` BUG at check_reserve:513 ... XArray: 6782340 of 6782364 tests passed ``` and exits 0. Running the xarray tests after this change requires a simpler invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ xarray ``` which on failure produces (colors omitted) ``` [09:50:53] ====================== check_reserve ====================== [09:50:53] [FAILED] param-0 [09:50:53] # check_reserve: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_xarray.c:536 [09:50:53] xa_erase(xa, 12345678) != NULL ... [09:50:53] # module: test_xarray [09:50:53] # xarray: pass:26 fail:3 skip:0 total:29 [09:50:53] # Totals: pass:28 fail:3 skip:0 total:31 [09:50:53] ===================== [FAILED] xarray ====================== ``` and exits 1. Use of richer kunit assertions is intentionally omitted to reduce the scope of the change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241205-xarray-kunit-port-v1-1-ee44bc7aa201@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com> Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-12-05 15:11:26 +00:00
xa_erase_index(test, xa, i);
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_get_mark(xa, i, XA_MARK_0));
}
XA_BUG_ON(xa, !xa_empty(xa));
}
xarray: port tests to kunit Minimally rewrite the XArray unit tests to use kunit. This integrates nicely with existing kunit tools which produce nicer human-readable output compared to the existing machinery. Running the xarray tests before this change requires an obscure invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ --kconfig_add CONFIG_TEST_XARRAY=y --raw_output=all nothing ``` which on failure produces ``` BUG at check_reserve:513 ... XArray: 6782340 of 6782364 tests passed ``` and exits 0. Running the xarray tests after this change requires a simpler invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ xarray ``` which on failure produces (colors omitted) ``` [09:50:53] ====================== check_reserve ====================== [09:50:53] [FAILED] param-0 [09:50:53] # check_reserve: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_xarray.c:536 [09:50:53] xa_erase(xa, 12345678) != NULL ... [09:50:53] # module: test_xarray [09:50:53] # xarray: pass:26 fail:3 skip:0 total:29 [09:50:53] # Totals: pass:28 fail:3 skip:0 total:31 [09:50:53] ===================== [FAILED] xarray ====================== ``` and exits 1. Use of richer kunit assertions is intentionally omitted to reduce the scope of the change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241205-xarray-kunit-port-v1-1-ee44bc7aa201@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com> Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-12-05 15:11:26 +00:00
static noinline void check_find_2(struct kunit *test)
{
xarray: port tests to kunit Minimally rewrite the XArray unit tests to use kunit. This integrates nicely with existing kunit tools which produce nicer human-readable output compared to the existing machinery. Running the xarray tests before this change requires an obscure invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ --kconfig_add CONFIG_TEST_XARRAY=y --raw_output=all nothing ``` which on failure produces ``` BUG at check_reserve:513 ... XArray: 6782340 of 6782364 tests passed ``` and exits 0. Running the xarray tests after this change requires a simpler invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ xarray ``` which on failure produces (colors omitted) ``` [09:50:53] ====================== check_reserve ====================== [09:50:53] [FAILED] param-0 [09:50:53] # check_reserve: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_xarray.c:536 [09:50:53] xa_erase(xa, 12345678) != NULL ... [09:50:53] # module: test_xarray [09:50:53] # xarray: pass:26 fail:3 skip:0 total:29 [09:50:53] # Totals: pass:28 fail:3 skip:0 total:31 [09:50:53] ===================== [FAILED] xarray ====================== ``` and exits 1. Use of richer kunit assertions is intentionally omitted to reduce the scope of the change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241205-xarray-kunit-port-v1-1-ee44bc7aa201@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com> Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-12-05 15:11:26 +00:00
struct xarray *xa = xa_param(test);
void *entry;
unsigned long i, j, index;
xa_for_each(xa, index, entry) {
XA_BUG_ON(xa, true);
}
for (i = 0; i < 1024; i++) {
xa_store_index(xa, index, GFP_KERNEL);
j = 0;
xa_for_each(xa, index, entry) {
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_mk_index(index) != entry);
XA_BUG_ON(xa, index != j++);
}
}
xa_destroy(xa);
}
xarray: port tests to kunit Minimally rewrite the XArray unit tests to use kunit. This integrates nicely with existing kunit tools which produce nicer human-readable output compared to the existing machinery. Running the xarray tests before this change requires an obscure invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ --kconfig_add CONFIG_TEST_XARRAY=y --raw_output=all nothing ``` which on failure produces ``` BUG at check_reserve:513 ... XArray: 6782340 of 6782364 tests passed ``` and exits 0. Running the xarray tests after this change requires a simpler invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ xarray ``` which on failure produces (colors omitted) ``` [09:50:53] ====================== check_reserve ====================== [09:50:53] [FAILED] param-0 [09:50:53] # check_reserve: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_xarray.c:536 [09:50:53] xa_erase(xa, 12345678) != NULL ... [09:50:53] # module: test_xarray [09:50:53] # xarray: pass:26 fail:3 skip:0 total:29 [09:50:53] # Totals: pass:28 fail:3 skip:0 total:31 [09:50:53] ===================== [FAILED] xarray ====================== ``` and exits 1. Use of richer kunit assertions is intentionally omitted to reduce the scope of the change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241205-xarray-kunit-port-v1-1-ee44bc7aa201@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com> Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-12-05 15:11:26 +00:00
static noinline void check_find_3(struct kunit *test)
{
xarray: port tests to kunit Minimally rewrite the XArray unit tests to use kunit. This integrates nicely with existing kunit tools which produce nicer human-readable output compared to the existing machinery. Running the xarray tests before this change requires an obscure invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ --kconfig_add CONFIG_TEST_XARRAY=y --raw_output=all nothing ``` which on failure produces ``` BUG at check_reserve:513 ... XArray: 6782340 of 6782364 tests passed ``` and exits 0. Running the xarray tests after this change requires a simpler invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ xarray ``` which on failure produces (colors omitted) ``` [09:50:53] ====================== check_reserve ====================== [09:50:53] [FAILED] param-0 [09:50:53] # check_reserve: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_xarray.c:536 [09:50:53] xa_erase(xa, 12345678) != NULL ... [09:50:53] # module: test_xarray [09:50:53] # xarray: pass:26 fail:3 skip:0 total:29 [09:50:53] # Totals: pass:28 fail:3 skip:0 total:31 [09:50:53] ===================== [FAILED] xarray ====================== ``` and exits 1. Use of richer kunit assertions is intentionally omitted to reduce the scope of the change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241205-xarray-kunit-port-v1-1-ee44bc7aa201@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com> Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-12-05 15:11:26 +00:00
struct xarray *xa = xa_param(test);
XA_STATE(xas, xa, 0);
unsigned long i, j, k;
void *entry;
for (i = 0; i < 100; i++) {
for (j = 0; j < 100; j++) {
rcu_read_lock();
for (k = 0; k < 100; k++) {
xas_set(&xas, j);
xas_for_each_marked(&xas, entry, k, XA_MARK_0)
;
if (j > k)
XA_BUG_ON(xa,
xas.xa_node != XAS_RESTART);
}
rcu_read_unlock();
}
xa_store_index(xa, i, GFP_KERNEL);
xa_set_mark(xa, i, XA_MARK_0);
}
xa_destroy(xa);
}
xarray: port tests to kunit Minimally rewrite the XArray unit tests to use kunit. This integrates nicely with existing kunit tools which produce nicer human-readable output compared to the existing machinery. Running the xarray tests before this change requires an obscure invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ --kconfig_add CONFIG_TEST_XARRAY=y --raw_output=all nothing ``` which on failure produces ``` BUG at check_reserve:513 ... XArray: 6782340 of 6782364 tests passed ``` and exits 0. Running the xarray tests after this change requires a simpler invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ xarray ``` which on failure produces (colors omitted) ``` [09:50:53] ====================== check_reserve ====================== [09:50:53] [FAILED] param-0 [09:50:53] # check_reserve: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_xarray.c:536 [09:50:53] xa_erase(xa, 12345678) != NULL ... [09:50:53] # module: test_xarray [09:50:53] # xarray: pass:26 fail:3 skip:0 total:29 [09:50:53] # Totals: pass:28 fail:3 skip:0 total:31 [09:50:53] ===================== [FAILED] xarray ====================== ``` and exits 1. Use of richer kunit assertions is intentionally omitted to reduce the scope of the change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241205-xarray-kunit-port-v1-1-ee44bc7aa201@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com> Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-12-05 15:11:26 +00:00
static noinline void check_find_4(struct kunit *test)
{
xarray: port tests to kunit Minimally rewrite the XArray unit tests to use kunit. This integrates nicely with existing kunit tools which produce nicer human-readable output compared to the existing machinery. Running the xarray tests before this change requires an obscure invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ --kconfig_add CONFIG_TEST_XARRAY=y --raw_output=all nothing ``` which on failure produces ``` BUG at check_reserve:513 ... XArray: 6782340 of 6782364 tests passed ``` and exits 0. Running the xarray tests after this change requires a simpler invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ xarray ``` which on failure produces (colors omitted) ``` [09:50:53] ====================== check_reserve ====================== [09:50:53] [FAILED] param-0 [09:50:53] # check_reserve: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_xarray.c:536 [09:50:53] xa_erase(xa, 12345678) != NULL ... [09:50:53] # module: test_xarray [09:50:53] # xarray: pass:26 fail:3 skip:0 total:29 [09:50:53] # Totals: pass:28 fail:3 skip:0 total:31 [09:50:53] ===================== [FAILED] xarray ====================== ``` and exits 1. Use of richer kunit assertions is intentionally omitted to reduce the scope of the change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241205-xarray-kunit-port-v1-1-ee44bc7aa201@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com> Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-12-05 15:11:26 +00:00
struct xarray *xa = xa_param(test);
unsigned long index = 0;
void *entry;
xa_store_index(xa, ULONG_MAX, GFP_KERNEL);
entry = xa_find_after(xa, &index, ULONG_MAX, XA_PRESENT);
XA_BUG_ON(xa, entry != xa_mk_index(ULONG_MAX));
entry = xa_find_after(xa, &index, ULONG_MAX, XA_PRESENT);
XA_BUG_ON(xa, entry);
xarray: port tests to kunit Minimally rewrite the XArray unit tests to use kunit. This integrates nicely with existing kunit tools which produce nicer human-readable output compared to the existing machinery. Running the xarray tests before this change requires an obscure invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ --kconfig_add CONFIG_TEST_XARRAY=y --raw_output=all nothing ``` which on failure produces ``` BUG at check_reserve:513 ... XArray: 6782340 of 6782364 tests passed ``` and exits 0. Running the xarray tests after this change requires a simpler invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ xarray ``` which on failure produces (colors omitted) ``` [09:50:53] ====================== check_reserve ====================== [09:50:53] [FAILED] param-0 [09:50:53] # check_reserve: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_xarray.c:536 [09:50:53] xa_erase(xa, 12345678) != NULL ... [09:50:53] # module: test_xarray [09:50:53] # xarray: pass:26 fail:3 skip:0 total:29 [09:50:53] # Totals: pass:28 fail:3 skip:0 total:31 [09:50:53] ===================== [FAILED] xarray ====================== ``` and exits 1. Use of richer kunit assertions is intentionally omitted to reduce the scope of the change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241205-xarray-kunit-port-v1-1-ee44bc7aa201@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com> Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-12-05 15:11:26 +00:00
xa_erase_index(test, xa, ULONG_MAX);
}
xarray: port tests to kunit Minimally rewrite the XArray unit tests to use kunit. This integrates nicely with existing kunit tools which produce nicer human-readable output compared to the existing machinery. Running the xarray tests before this change requires an obscure invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ --kconfig_add CONFIG_TEST_XARRAY=y --raw_output=all nothing ``` which on failure produces ``` BUG at check_reserve:513 ... XArray: 6782340 of 6782364 tests passed ``` and exits 0. Running the xarray tests after this change requires a simpler invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ xarray ``` which on failure produces (colors omitted) ``` [09:50:53] ====================== check_reserve ====================== [09:50:53] [FAILED] param-0 [09:50:53] # check_reserve: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_xarray.c:536 [09:50:53] xa_erase(xa, 12345678) != NULL ... [09:50:53] # module: test_xarray [09:50:53] # xarray: pass:26 fail:3 skip:0 total:29 [09:50:53] # Totals: pass:28 fail:3 skip:0 total:31 [09:50:53] ===================== [FAILED] xarray ====================== ``` and exits 1. Use of richer kunit assertions is intentionally omitted to reduce the scope of the change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241205-xarray-kunit-port-v1-1-ee44bc7aa201@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com> Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-12-05 15:11:26 +00:00
static noinline void check_find(struct kunit *test)
{
unsigned i;
xarray: port tests to kunit Minimally rewrite the XArray unit tests to use kunit. This integrates nicely with existing kunit tools which produce nicer human-readable output compared to the existing machinery. Running the xarray tests before this change requires an obscure invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ --kconfig_add CONFIG_TEST_XARRAY=y --raw_output=all nothing ``` which on failure produces ``` BUG at check_reserve:513 ... XArray: 6782340 of 6782364 tests passed ``` and exits 0. Running the xarray tests after this change requires a simpler invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ xarray ``` which on failure produces (colors omitted) ``` [09:50:53] ====================== check_reserve ====================== [09:50:53] [FAILED] param-0 [09:50:53] # check_reserve: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_xarray.c:536 [09:50:53] xa_erase(xa, 12345678) != NULL ... [09:50:53] # module: test_xarray [09:50:53] # xarray: pass:26 fail:3 skip:0 total:29 [09:50:53] # Totals: pass:28 fail:3 skip:0 total:31 [09:50:53] ===================== [FAILED] xarray ====================== ``` and exits 1. Use of richer kunit assertions is intentionally omitted to reduce the scope of the change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241205-xarray-kunit-port-v1-1-ee44bc7aa201@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com> Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-12-05 15:11:26 +00:00
check_find_1(test);
check_find_2(test);
check_find_3(test);
check_find_4(test);
for (i = 2; i < 10; i++)
xarray: port tests to kunit Minimally rewrite the XArray unit tests to use kunit. This integrates nicely with existing kunit tools which produce nicer human-readable output compared to the existing machinery. Running the xarray tests before this change requires an obscure invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ --kconfig_add CONFIG_TEST_XARRAY=y --raw_output=all nothing ``` which on failure produces ``` BUG at check_reserve:513 ... XArray: 6782340 of 6782364 tests passed ``` and exits 0. Running the xarray tests after this change requires a simpler invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ xarray ``` which on failure produces (colors omitted) ``` [09:50:53] ====================== check_reserve ====================== [09:50:53] [FAILED] param-0 [09:50:53] # check_reserve: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_xarray.c:536 [09:50:53] xa_erase(xa, 12345678) != NULL ... [09:50:53] # module: test_xarray [09:50:53] # xarray: pass:26 fail:3 skip:0 total:29 [09:50:53] # Totals: pass:28 fail:3 skip:0 total:31 [09:50:53] ===================== [FAILED] xarray ====================== ``` and exits 1. Use of richer kunit assertions is intentionally omitted to reduce the scope of the change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241205-xarray-kunit-port-v1-1-ee44bc7aa201@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com> Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-12-05 15:11:26 +00:00
check_multi_find_1(test, i);
check_multi_find_2(test);
check_multi_find_3(test);
}
/* See find_swap_entry() in mm/shmem.c */
static noinline unsigned long xa_find_entry(struct xarray *xa, void *item)
{
XA_STATE(xas, xa, 0);
unsigned int checked = 0;
void *entry;
rcu_read_lock();
xas_for_each(&xas, entry, ULONG_MAX) {
if (xas_retry(&xas, entry))
continue;
if (entry == item)
break;
checked++;
if ((checked % 4) != 0)
continue;
xas_pause(&xas);
}
rcu_read_unlock();
return entry ? xas.xa_index : -1;
}
xarray: port tests to kunit Minimally rewrite the XArray unit tests to use kunit. This integrates nicely with existing kunit tools which produce nicer human-readable output compared to the existing machinery. Running the xarray tests before this change requires an obscure invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ --kconfig_add CONFIG_TEST_XARRAY=y --raw_output=all nothing ``` which on failure produces ``` BUG at check_reserve:513 ... XArray: 6782340 of 6782364 tests passed ``` and exits 0. Running the xarray tests after this change requires a simpler invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ xarray ``` which on failure produces (colors omitted) ``` [09:50:53] ====================== check_reserve ====================== [09:50:53] [FAILED] param-0 [09:50:53] # check_reserve: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_xarray.c:536 [09:50:53] xa_erase(xa, 12345678) != NULL ... [09:50:53] # module: test_xarray [09:50:53] # xarray: pass:26 fail:3 skip:0 total:29 [09:50:53] # Totals: pass:28 fail:3 skip:0 total:31 [09:50:53] ===================== [FAILED] xarray ====================== ``` and exits 1. Use of richer kunit assertions is intentionally omitted to reduce the scope of the change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241205-xarray-kunit-port-v1-1-ee44bc7aa201@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com> Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-12-05 15:11:26 +00:00
static noinline void check_find_entry(struct kunit *test)
{
xarray: port tests to kunit Minimally rewrite the XArray unit tests to use kunit. This integrates nicely with existing kunit tools which produce nicer human-readable output compared to the existing machinery. Running the xarray tests before this change requires an obscure invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ --kconfig_add CONFIG_TEST_XARRAY=y --raw_output=all nothing ``` which on failure produces ``` BUG at check_reserve:513 ... XArray: 6782340 of 6782364 tests passed ``` and exits 0. Running the xarray tests after this change requires a simpler invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ xarray ``` which on failure produces (colors omitted) ``` [09:50:53] ====================== check_reserve ====================== [09:50:53] [FAILED] param-0 [09:50:53] # check_reserve: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_xarray.c:536 [09:50:53] xa_erase(xa, 12345678) != NULL ... [09:50:53] # module: test_xarray [09:50:53] # xarray: pass:26 fail:3 skip:0 total:29 [09:50:53] # Totals: pass:28 fail:3 skip:0 total:31 [09:50:53] ===================== [FAILED] xarray ====================== ``` and exits 1. Use of richer kunit assertions is intentionally omitted to reduce the scope of the change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241205-xarray-kunit-port-v1-1-ee44bc7aa201@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com> Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-12-05 15:11:26 +00:00
struct xarray *xa = xa_param(test);
#ifdef CONFIG_XARRAY_MULTI
unsigned int order;
unsigned long offset, index;
for (order = 0; order < 20; order++) {
for (offset = 0; offset < (1UL << (order + 3));
offset += (1UL << order)) {
for (index = 0; index < (1UL << (order + 5));
index += (1UL << order)) {
xa_store_order(xa, index, order,
xa_mk_index(index), GFP_KERNEL);
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_load(xa, index) !=
xa_mk_index(index));
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_find_entry(xa,
xa_mk_index(index)) != index);
}
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_find_entry(xa, xa) != -1);
xa_destroy(xa);
}
}
#endif
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_find_entry(xa, xa) != -1);
xa_store_index(xa, ULONG_MAX, GFP_KERNEL);
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_find_entry(xa, xa) != -1);
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_find_entry(xa, xa_mk_index(ULONG_MAX)) != -1);
xarray: port tests to kunit Minimally rewrite the XArray unit tests to use kunit. This integrates nicely with existing kunit tools which produce nicer human-readable output compared to the existing machinery. Running the xarray tests before this change requires an obscure invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ --kconfig_add CONFIG_TEST_XARRAY=y --raw_output=all nothing ``` which on failure produces ``` BUG at check_reserve:513 ... XArray: 6782340 of 6782364 tests passed ``` and exits 0. Running the xarray tests after this change requires a simpler invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ xarray ``` which on failure produces (colors omitted) ``` [09:50:53] ====================== check_reserve ====================== [09:50:53] [FAILED] param-0 [09:50:53] # check_reserve: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_xarray.c:536 [09:50:53] xa_erase(xa, 12345678) != NULL ... [09:50:53] # module: test_xarray [09:50:53] # xarray: pass:26 fail:3 skip:0 total:29 [09:50:53] # Totals: pass:28 fail:3 skip:0 total:31 [09:50:53] ===================== [FAILED] xarray ====================== ``` and exits 1. Use of richer kunit assertions is intentionally omitted to reduce the scope of the change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241205-xarray-kunit-port-v1-1-ee44bc7aa201@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com> Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-12-05 15:11:26 +00:00
xa_erase_index(test, xa, ULONG_MAX);
XA_BUG_ON(xa, !xa_empty(xa));
}
xarray: port tests to kunit Minimally rewrite the XArray unit tests to use kunit. This integrates nicely with existing kunit tools which produce nicer human-readable output compared to the existing machinery. Running the xarray tests before this change requires an obscure invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ --kconfig_add CONFIG_TEST_XARRAY=y --raw_output=all nothing ``` which on failure produces ``` BUG at check_reserve:513 ... XArray: 6782340 of 6782364 tests passed ``` and exits 0. Running the xarray tests after this change requires a simpler invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ xarray ``` which on failure produces (colors omitted) ``` [09:50:53] ====================== check_reserve ====================== [09:50:53] [FAILED] param-0 [09:50:53] # check_reserve: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_xarray.c:536 [09:50:53] xa_erase(xa, 12345678) != NULL ... [09:50:53] # module: test_xarray [09:50:53] # xarray: pass:26 fail:3 skip:0 total:29 [09:50:53] # Totals: pass:28 fail:3 skip:0 total:31 [09:50:53] ===================== [FAILED] xarray ====================== ``` and exits 1. Use of richer kunit assertions is intentionally omitted to reduce the scope of the change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241205-xarray-kunit-port-v1-1-ee44bc7aa201@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com> Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-12-05 15:11:26 +00:00
static noinline void check_pause(struct kunit *test)
{
xarray: port tests to kunit Minimally rewrite the XArray unit tests to use kunit. This integrates nicely with existing kunit tools which produce nicer human-readable output compared to the existing machinery. Running the xarray tests before this change requires an obscure invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ --kconfig_add CONFIG_TEST_XARRAY=y --raw_output=all nothing ``` which on failure produces ``` BUG at check_reserve:513 ... XArray: 6782340 of 6782364 tests passed ``` and exits 0. Running the xarray tests after this change requires a simpler invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ xarray ``` which on failure produces (colors omitted) ``` [09:50:53] ====================== check_reserve ====================== [09:50:53] [FAILED] param-0 [09:50:53] # check_reserve: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_xarray.c:536 [09:50:53] xa_erase(xa, 12345678) != NULL ... [09:50:53] # module: test_xarray [09:50:53] # xarray: pass:26 fail:3 skip:0 total:29 [09:50:53] # Totals: pass:28 fail:3 skip:0 total:31 [09:50:53] ===================== [FAILED] xarray ====================== ``` and exits 1. Use of richer kunit assertions is intentionally omitted to reduce the scope of the change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241205-xarray-kunit-port-v1-1-ee44bc7aa201@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com> Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-12-05 15:11:26 +00:00
struct xarray *xa = xa_param(test);
XA_STATE(xas, xa, 0);
void *entry;
unsigned int order;
unsigned long index = 1;
unsigned int count = 0;
for (order = 0; order < order_limit; order++) {
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_store_order(xa, index, order,
xa_mk_index(index), GFP_KERNEL));
index += 1UL << order;
}
rcu_read_lock();
xas_for_each(&xas, entry, ULONG_MAX) {
XA_BUG_ON(xa, entry != xa_mk_index(1UL << count));
count++;
}
rcu_read_unlock();
XA_BUG_ON(xa, count != order_limit);
count = 0;
xas_set(&xas, 0);
rcu_read_lock();
xas_for_each(&xas, entry, ULONG_MAX) {
XA_BUG_ON(xa, entry != xa_mk_index(1UL << count));
count++;
xas_pause(&xas);
}
rcu_read_unlock();
XA_BUG_ON(xa, count != order_limit);
xa_destroy(xa);
index = 0;
for (order = XA_CHUNK_SHIFT; order > 0; order--) {
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_store_order(xa, index, order,
xa_mk_index(index), GFP_KERNEL));
index += 1UL << order;
}
index = 0;
count = 0;
xas_set(&xas, 0);
rcu_read_lock();
xas_for_each(&xas, entry, ULONG_MAX) {
XA_BUG_ON(xa, entry != xa_mk_index(index));
index += 1UL << (XA_CHUNK_SHIFT - count);
count++;
}
rcu_read_unlock();
XA_BUG_ON(xa, count != XA_CHUNK_SHIFT);
index = 0;
count = 0;
xas_set(&xas, XA_CHUNK_SIZE / 2 + 1);
rcu_read_lock();
xas_for_each(&xas, entry, ULONG_MAX) {
XA_BUG_ON(xa, entry != xa_mk_index(index));
index += 1UL << (XA_CHUNK_SHIFT - count);
count++;
xas_pause(&xas);
}
rcu_read_unlock();
XA_BUG_ON(xa, count != XA_CHUNK_SHIFT);
xa_destroy(xa);
}
xarray: port tests to kunit Minimally rewrite the XArray unit tests to use kunit. This integrates nicely with existing kunit tools which produce nicer human-readable output compared to the existing machinery. Running the xarray tests before this change requires an obscure invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ --kconfig_add CONFIG_TEST_XARRAY=y --raw_output=all nothing ``` which on failure produces ``` BUG at check_reserve:513 ... XArray: 6782340 of 6782364 tests passed ``` and exits 0. Running the xarray tests after this change requires a simpler invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ xarray ``` which on failure produces (colors omitted) ``` [09:50:53] ====================== check_reserve ====================== [09:50:53] [FAILED] param-0 [09:50:53] # check_reserve: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_xarray.c:536 [09:50:53] xa_erase(xa, 12345678) != NULL ... [09:50:53] # module: test_xarray [09:50:53] # xarray: pass:26 fail:3 skip:0 total:29 [09:50:53] # Totals: pass:28 fail:3 skip:0 total:31 [09:50:53] ===================== [FAILED] xarray ====================== ``` and exits 1. Use of richer kunit assertions is intentionally omitted to reduce the scope of the change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241205-xarray-kunit-port-v1-1-ee44bc7aa201@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com> Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-12-05 15:11:26 +00:00
static noinline void check_move_tiny(struct kunit *test)
{
xarray: port tests to kunit Minimally rewrite the XArray unit tests to use kunit. This integrates nicely with existing kunit tools which produce nicer human-readable output compared to the existing machinery. Running the xarray tests before this change requires an obscure invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ --kconfig_add CONFIG_TEST_XARRAY=y --raw_output=all nothing ``` which on failure produces ``` BUG at check_reserve:513 ... XArray: 6782340 of 6782364 tests passed ``` and exits 0. Running the xarray tests after this change requires a simpler invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ xarray ``` which on failure produces (colors omitted) ``` [09:50:53] ====================== check_reserve ====================== [09:50:53] [FAILED] param-0 [09:50:53] # check_reserve: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_xarray.c:536 [09:50:53] xa_erase(xa, 12345678) != NULL ... [09:50:53] # module: test_xarray [09:50:53] # xarray: pass:26 fail:3 skip:0 total:29 [09:50:53] # Totals: pass:28 fail:3 skip:0 total:31 [09:50:53] ===================== [FAILED] xarray ====================== ``` and exits 1. Use of richer kunit assertions is intentionally omitted to reduce the scope of the change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241205-xarray-kunit-port-v1-1-ee44bc7aa201@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com> Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-12-05 15:11:26 +00:00
struct xarray *xa = xa_param(test);
XA_STATE(xas, xa, 0);
XA_BUG_ON(xa, !xa_empty(xa));
rcu_read_lock();
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xas_next(&xas) != NULL);
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xas_next(&xas) != NULL);
rcu_read_unlock();
xa_store_index(xa, 0, GFP_KERNEL);
rcu_read_lock();
xas_set(&xas, 0);
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xas_next(&xas) != xa_mk_index(0));
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xas_next(&xas) != NULL);
xas_set(&xas, 0);
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xas_prev(&xas) != xa_mk_index(0));
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xas_prev(&xas) != NULL);
rcu_read_unlock();
xarray: port tests to kunit Minimally rewrite the XArray unit tests to use kunit. This integrates nicely with existing kunit tools which produce nicer human-readable output compared to the existing machinery. Running the xarray tests before this change requires an obscure invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ --kconfig_add CONFIG_TEST_XARRAY=y --raw_output=all nothing ``` which on failure produces ``` BUG at check_reserve:513 ... XArray: 6782340 of 6782364 tests passed ``` and exits 0. Running the xarray tests after this change requires a simpler invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ xarray ``` which on failure produces (colors omitted) ``` [09:50:53] ====================== check_reserve ====================== [09:50:53] [FAILED] param-0 [09:50:53] # check_reserve: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_xarray.c:536 [09:50:53] xa_erase(xa, 12345678) != NULL ... [09:50:53] # module: test_xarray [09:50:53] # xarray: pass:26 fail:3 skip:0 total:29 [09:50:53] # Totals: pass:28 fail:3 skip:0 total:31 [09:50:53] ===================== [FAILED] xarray ====================== ``` and exits 1. Use of richer kunit assertions is intentionally omitted to reduce the scope of the change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241205-xarray-kunit-port-v1-1-ee44bc7aa201@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com> Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-12-05 15:11:26 +00:00
xa_erase_index(test, xa, 0);
XA_BUG_ON(xa, !xa_empty(xa));
}
xarray: port tests to kunit Minimally rewrite the XArray unit tests to use kunit. This integrates nicely with existing kunit tools which produce nicer human-readable output compared to the existing machinery. Running the xarray tests before this change requires an obscure invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ --kconfig_add CONFIG_TEST_XARRAY=y --raw_output=all nothing ``` which on failure produces ``` BUG at check_reserve:513 ... XArray: 6782340 of 6782364 tests passed ``` and exits 0. Running the xarray tests after this change requires a simpler invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ xarray ``` which on failure produces (colors omitted) ``` [09:50:53] ====================== check_reserve ====================== [09:50:53] [FAILED] param-0 [09:50:53] # check_reserve: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_xarray.c:536 [09:50:53] xa_erase(xa, 12345678) != NULL ... [09:50:53] # module: test_xarray [09:50:53] # xarray: pass:26 fail:3 skip:0 total:29 [09:50:53] # Totals: pass:28 fail:3 skip:0 total:31 [09:50:53] ===================== [FAILED] xarray ====================== ``` and exits 1. Use of richer kunit assertions is intentionally omitted to reduce the scope of the change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241205-xarray-kunit-port-v1-1-ee44bc7aa201@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com> Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-12-05 15:11:26 +00:00
static noinline void check_move_max(struct kunit *test)
{
xarray: port tests to kunit Minimally rewrite the XArray unit tests to use kunit. This integrates nicely with existing kunit tools which produce nicer human-readable output compared to the existing machinery. Running the xarray tests before this change requires an obscure invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ --kconfig_add CONFIG_TEST_XARRAY=y --raw_output=all nothing ``` which on failure produces ``` BUG at check_reserve:513 ... XArray: 6782340 of 6782364 tests passed ``` and exits 0. Running the xarray tests after this change requires a simpler invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ xarray ``` which on failure produces (colors omitted) ``` [09:50:53] ====================== check_reserve ====================== [09:50:53] [FAILED] param-0 [09:50:53] # check_reserve: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_xarray.c:536 [09:50:53] xa_erase(xa, 12345678) != NULL ... [09:50:53] # module: test_xarray [09:50:53] # xarray: pass:26 fail:3 skip:0 total:29 [09:50:53] # Totals: pass:28 fail:3 skip:0 total:31 [09:50:53] ===================== [FAILED] xarray ====================== ``` and exits 1. Use of richer kunit assertions is intentionally omitted to reduce the scope of the change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241205-xarray-kunit-port-v1-1-ee44bc7aa201@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com> Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-12-05 15:11:26 +00:00
struct xarray *xa = xa_param(test);
XA_STATE(xas, xa, 0);
xa_store_index(xa, ULONG_MAX, GFP_KERNEL);
rcu_read_lock();
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xas_find(&xas, ULONG_MAX) != xa_mk_index(ULONG_MAX));
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xas_find(&xas, ULONG_MAX) != NULL);
rcu_read_unlock();
xas_set(&xas, 0);
rcu_read_lock();
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xas_find(&xas, ULONG_MAX) != xa_mk_index(ULONG_MAX));
xas_pause(&xas);
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xas_find(&xas, ULONG_MAX) != NULL);
rcu_read_unlock();
xarray: port tests to kunit Minimally rewrite the XArray unit tests to use kunit. This integrates nicely with existing kunit tools which produce nicer human-readable output compared to the existing machinery. Running the xarray tests before this change requires an obscure invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ --kconfig_add CONFIG_TEST_XARRAY=y --raw_output=all nothing ``` which on failure produces ``` BUG at check_reserve:513 ... XArray: 6782340 of 6782364 tests passed ``` and exits 0. Running the xarray tests after this change requires a simpler invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ xarray ``` which on failure produces (colors omitted) ``` [09:50:53] ====================== check_reserve ====================== [09:50:53] [FAILED] param-0 [09:50:53] # check_reserve: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_xarray.c:536 [09:50:53] xa_erase(xa, 12345678) != NULL ... [09:50:53] # module: test_xarray [09:50:53] # xarray: pass:26 fail:3 skip:0 total:29 [09:50:53] # Totals: pass:28 fail:3 skip:0 total:31 [09:50:53] ===================== [FAILED] xarray ====================== ``` and exits 1. Use of richer kunit assertions is intentionally omitted to reduce the scope of the change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241205-xarray-kunit-port-v1-1-ee44bc7aa201@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com> Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-12-05 15:11:26 +00:00
xa_erase_index(test, xa, ULONG_MAX);
XA_BUG_ON(xa, !xa_empty(xa));
}
xarray: port tests to kunit Minimally rewrite the XArray unit tests to use kunit. This integrates nicely with existing kunit tools which produce nicer human-readable output compared to the existing machinery. Running the xarray tests before this change requires an obscure invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ --kconfig_add CONFIG_TEST_XARRAY=y --raw_output=all nothing ``` which on failure produces ``` BUG at check_reserve:513 ... XArray: 6782340 of 6782364 tests passed ``` and exits 0. Running the xarray tests after this change requires a simpler invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ xarray ``` which on failure produces (colors omitted) ``` [09:50:53] ====================== check_reserve ====================== [09:50:53] [FAILED] param-0 [09:50:53] # check_reserve: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_xarray.c:536 [09:50:53] xa_erase(xa, 12345678) != NULL ... [09:50:53] # module: test_xarray [09:50:53] # xarray: pass:26 fail:3 skip:0 total:29 [09:50:53] # Totals: pass:28 fail:3 skip:0 total:31 [09:50:53] ===================== [FAILED] xarray ====================== ``` and exits 1. Use of richer kunit assertions is intentionally omitted to reduce the scope of the change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241205-xarray-kunit-port-v1-1-ee44bc7aa201@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com> Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-12-05 15:11:26 +00:00
static noinline void check_move_small(struct kunit *test, unsigned long idx)
{
xarray: port tests to kunit Minimally rewrite the XArray unit tests to use kunit. This integrates nicely with existing kunit tools which produce nicer human-readable output compared to the existing machinery. Running the xarray tests before this change requires an obscure invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ --kconfig_add CONFIG_TEST_XARRAY=y --raw_output=all nothing ``` which on failure produces ``` BUG at check_reserve:513 ... XArray: 6782340 of 6782364 tests passed ``` and exits 0. Running the xarray tests after this change requires a simpler invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ xarray ``` which on failure produces (colors omitted) ``` [09:50:53] ====================== check_reserve ====================== [09:50:53] [FAILED] param-0 [09:50:53] # check_reserve: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_xarray.c:536 [09:50:53] xa_erase(xa, 12345678) != NULL ... [09:50:53] # module: test_xarray [09:50:53] # xarray: pass:26 fail:3 skip:0 total:29 [09:50:53] # Totals: pass:28 fail:3 skip:0 total:31 [09:50:53] ===================== [FAILED] xarray ====================== ``` and exits 1. Use of richer kunit assertions is intentionally omitted to reduce the scope of the change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241205-xarray-kunit-port-v1-1-ee44bc7aa201@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com> Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-12-05 15:11:26 +00:00
struct xarray *xa = xa_param(test);
XA_STATE(xas, xa, 0);
unsigned long i;
xa_store_index(xa, 0, GFP_KERNEL);
xa_store_index(xa, idx, GFP_KERNEL);
rcu_read_lock();
for (i = 0; i < idx * 4; i++) {
void *entry = xas_next(&xas);
if (i <= idx)
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xas.xa_node == XAS_RESTART);
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xas.xa_index != i);
if (i == 0 || i == idx)
XA_BUG_ON(xa, entry != xa_mk_index(i));
else
XA_BUG_ON(xa, entry != NULL);
}
xas_next(&xas);
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xas.xa_index != i);
do {
void *entry = xas_prev(&xas);
i--;
if (i <= idx)
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xas.xa_node == XAS_RESTART);
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xas.xa_index != i);
if (i == 0 || i == idx)
XA_BUG_ON(xa, entry != xa_mk_index(i));
else
XA_BUG_ON(xa, entry != NULL);
} while (i > 0);
xas_set(&xas, ULONG_MAX);
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xas_next(&xas) != NULL);
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xas.xa_index != ULONG_MAX);
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xas_next(&xas) != xa_mk_value(0));
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xas.xa_index != 0);
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xas_prev(&xas) != NULL);
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xas.xa_index != ULONG_MAX);
rcu_read_unlock();
xarray: port tests to kunit Minimally rewrite the XArray unit tests to use kunit. This integrates nicely with existing kunit tools which produce nicer human-readable output compared to the existing machinery. Running the xarray tests before this change requires an obscure invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ --kconfig_add CONFIG_TEST_XARRAY=y --raw_output=all nothing ``` which on failure produces ``` BUG at check_reserve:513 ... XArray: 6782340 of 6782364 tests passed ``` and exits 0. Running the xarray tests after this change requires a simpler invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ xarray ``` which on failure produces (colors omitted) ``` [09:50:53] ====================== check_reserve ====================== [09:50:53] [FAILED] param-0 [09:50:53] # check_reserve: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_xarray.c:536 [09:50:53] xa_erase(xa, 12345678) != NULL ... [09:50:53] # module: test_xarray [09:50:53] # xarray: pass:26 fail:3 skip:0 total:29 [09:50:53] # Totals: pass:28 fail:3 skip:0 total:31 [09:50:53] ===================== [FAILED] xarray ====================== ``` and exits 1. Use of richer kunit assertions is intentionally omitted to reduce the scope of the change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241205-xarray-kunit-port-v1-1-ee44bc7aa201@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com> Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-12-05 15:11:26 +00:00
xa_erase_index(test, xa, 0);
xa_erase_index(test, xa, idx);
XA_BUG_ON(xa, !xa_empty(xa));
}
xarray: port tests to kunit Minimally rewrite the XArray unit tests to use kunit. This integrates nicely with existing kunit tools which produce nicer human-readable output compared to the existing machinery. Running the xarray tests before this change requires an obscure invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ --kconfig_add CONFIG_TEST_XARRAY=y --raw_output=all nothing ``` which on failure produces ``` BUG at check_reserve:513 ... XArray: 6782340 of 6782364 tests passed ``` and exits 0. Running the xarray tests after this change requires a simpler invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ xarray ``` which on failure produces (colors omitted) ``` [09:50:53] ====================== check_reserve ====================== [09:50:53] [FAILED] param-0 [09:50:53] # check_reserve: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_xarray.c:536 [09:50:53] xa_erase(xa, 12345678) != NULL ... [09:50:53] # module: test_xarray [09:50:53] # xarray: pass:26 fail:3 skip:0 total:29 [09:50:53] # Totals: pass:28 fail:3 skip:0 total:31 [09:50:53] ===================== [FAILED] xarray ====================== ``` and exits 1. Use of richer kunit assertions is intentionally omitted to reduce the scope of the change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241205-xarray-kunit-port-v1-1-ee44bc7aa201@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com> Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-12-05 15:11:26 +00:00
static noinline void check_move(struct kunit *test)
{
xarray: port tests to kunit Minimally rewrite the XArray unit tests to use kunit. This integrates nicely with existing kunit tools which produce nicer human-readable output compared to the existing machinery. Running the xarray tests before this change requires an obscure invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ --kconfig_add CONFIG_TEST_XARRAY=y --raw_output=all nothing ``` which on failure produces ``` BUG at check_reserve:513 ... XArray: 6782340 of 6782364 tests passed ``` and exits 0. Running the xarray tests after this change requires a simpler invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ xarray ``` which on failure produces (colors omitted) ``` [09:50:53] ====================== check_reserve ====================== [09:50:53] [FAILED] param-0 [09:50:53] # check_reserve: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_xarray.c:536 [09:50:53] xa_erase(xa, 12345678) != NULL ... [09:50:53] # module: test_xarray [09:50:53] # xarray: pass:26 fail:3 skip:0 total:29 [09:50:53] # Totals: pass:28 fail:3 skip:0 total:31 [09:50:53] ===================== [FAILED] xarray ====================== ``` and exits 1. Use of richer kunit assertions is intentionally omitted to reduce the scope of the change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241205-xarray-kunit-port-v1-1-ee44bc7aa201@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com> Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-12-05 15:11:26 +00:00
struct xarray *xa = xa_param(test);
XA_STATE(xas, xa, (1 << 16) - 1);
unsigned long i;
for (i = 0; i < (1 << 16); i++)
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_store_index(xa, i, GFP_KERNEL) != NULL);
rcu_read_lock();
do {
void *entry = xas_prev(&xas);
i--;
XA_BUG_ON(xa, entry != xa_mk_index(i));
XA_BUG_ON(xa, i != xas.xa_index);
} while (i != 0);
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xas_prev(&xas) != NULL);
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xas.xa_index != ULONG_MAX);
do {
void *entry = xas_next(&xas);
XA_BUG_ON(xa, entry != xa_mk_index(i));
XA_BUG_ON(xa, i != xas.xa_index);
i++;
} while (i < (1 << 16));
rcu_read_unlock();
for (i = (1 << 8); i < (1 << 15); i++)
xarray: port tests to kunit Minimally rewrite the XArray unit tests to use kunit. This integrates nicely with existing kunit tools which produce nicer human-readable output compared to the existing machinery. Running the xarray tests before this change requires an obscure invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ --kconfig_add CONFIG_TEST_XARRAY=y --raw_output=all nothing ``` which on failure produces ``` BUG at check_reserve:513 ... XArray: 6782340 of 6782364 tests passed ``` and exits 0. Running the xarray tests after this change requires a simpler invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ xarray ``` which on failure produces (colors omitted) ``` [09:50:53] ====================== check_reserve ====================== [09:50:53] [FAILED] param-0 [09:50:53] # check_reserve: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_xarray.c:536 [09:50:53] xa_erase(xa, 12345678) != NULL ... [09:50:53] # module: test_xarray [09:50:53] # xarray: pass:26 fail:3 skip:0 total:29 [09:50:53] # Totals: pass:28 fail:3 skip:0 total:31 [09:50:53] ===================== [FAILED] xarray ====================== ``` and exits 1. Use of richer kunit assertions is intentionally omitted to reduce the scope of the change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241205-xarray-kunit-port-v1-1-ee44bc7aa201@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com> Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-12-05 15:11:26 +00:00
xa_erase_index(test, xa, i);
i = xas.xa_index;
rcu_read_lock();
do {
void *entry = xas_prev(&xas);
i--;
if ((i < (1 << 8)) || (i >= (1 << 15)))
XA_BUG_ON(xa, entry != xa_mk_index(i));
else
XA_BUG_ON(xa, entry != NULL);
XA_BUG_ON(xa, i != xas.xa_index);
} while (i != 0);
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xas_prev(&xas) != NULL);
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xas.xa_index != ULONG_MAX);
do {
void *entry = xas_next(&xas);
if ((i < (1 << 8)) || (i >= (1 << 15)))
XA_BUG_ON(xa, entry != xa_mk_index(i));
else
XA_BUG_ON(xa, entry != NULL);
XA_BUG_ON(xa, i != xas.xa_index);
i++;
} while (i < (1 << 16));
rcu_read_unlock();
xa_destroy(xa);
xarray: port tests to kunit Minimally rewrite the XArray unit tests to use kunit. This integrates nicely with existing kunit tools which produce nicer human-readable output compared to the existing machinery. Running the xarray tests before this change requires an obscure invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ --kconfig_add CONFIG_TEST_XARRAY=y --raw_output=all nothing ``` which on failure produces ``` BUG at check_reserve:513 ... XArray: 6782340 of 6782364 tests passed ``` and exits 0. Running the xarray tests after this change requires a simpler invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ xarray ``` which on failure produces (colors omitted) ``` [09:50:53] ====================== check_reserve ====================== [09:50:53] [FAILED] param-0 [09:50:53] # check_reserve: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_xarray.c:536 [09:50:53] xa_erase(xa, 12345678) != NULL ... [09:50:53] # module: test_xarray [09:50:53] # xarray: pass:26 fail:3 skip:0 total:29 [09:50:53] # Totals: pass:28 fail:3 skip:0 total:31 [09:50:53] ===================== [FAILED] xarray ====================== ``` and exits 1. Use of richer kunit assertions is intentionally omitted to reduce the scope of the change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241205-xarray-kunit-port-v1-1-ee44bc7aa201@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com> Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-12-05 15:11:26 +00:00
check_move_tiny(test);
check_move_max(test);
for (i = 0; i < 16; i++)
xarray: port tests to kunit Minimally rewrite the XArray unit tests to use kunit. This integrates nicely with existing kunit tools which produce nicer human-readable output compared to the existing machinery. Running the xarray tests before this change requires an obscure invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ --kconfig_add CONFIG_TEST_XARRAY=y --raw_output=all nothing ``` which on failure produces ``` BUG at check_reserve:513 ... XArray: 6782340 of 6782364 tests passed ``` and exits 0. Running the xarray tests after this change requires a simpler invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ xarray ``` which on failure produces (colors omitted) ``` [09:50:53] ====================== check_reserve ====================== [09:50:53] [FAILED] param-0 [09:50:53] # check_reserve: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_xarray.c:536 [09:50:53] xa_erase(xa, 12345678) != NULL ... [09:50:53] # module: test_xarray [09:50:53] # xarray: pass:26 fail:3 skip:0 total:29 [09:50:53] # Totals: pass:28 fail:3 skip:0 total:31 [09:50:53] ===================== [FAILED] xarray ====================== ``` and exits 1. Use of richer kunit assertions is intentionally omitted to reduce the scope of the change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241205-xarray-kunit-port-v1-1-ee44bc7aa201@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com> Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-12-05 15:11:26 +00:00
check_move_small(test, 1UL << i);
for (i = 2; i < 16; i++)
xarray: port tests to kunit Minimally rewrite the XArray unit tests to use kunit. This integrates nicely with existing kunit tools which produce nicer human-readable output compared to the existing machinery. Running the xarray tests before this change requires an obscure invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ --kconfig_add CONFIG_TEST_XARRAY=y --raw_output=all nothing ``` which on failure produces ``` BUG at check_reserve:513 ... XArray: 6782340 of 6782364 tests passed ``` and exits 0. Running the xarray tests after this change requires a simpler invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ xarray ``` which on failure produces (colors omitted) ``` [09:50:53] ====================== check_reserve ====================== [09:50:53] [FAILED] param-0 [09:50:53] # check_reserve: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_xarray.c:536 [09:50:53] xa_erase(xa, 12345678) != NULL ... [09:50:53] # module: test_xarray [09:50:53] # xarray: pass:26 fail:3 skip:0 total:29 [09:50:53] # Totals: pass:28 fail:3 skip:0 total:31 [09:50:53] ===================== [FAILED] xarray ====================== ``` and exits 1. Use of richer kunit assertions is intentionally omitted to reduce the scope of the change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241205-xarray-kunit-port-v1-1-ee44bc7aa201@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com> Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-12-05 15:11:26 +00:00
check_move_small(test, (1UL << i) - 1);
}
xarray: port tests to kunit Minimally rewrite the XArray unit tests to use kunit. This integrates nicely with existing kunit tools which produce nicer human-readable output compared to the existing machinery. Running the xarray tests before this change requires an obscure invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ --kconfig_add CONFIG_TEST_XARRAY=y --raw_output=all nothing ``` which on failure produces ``` BUG at check_reserve:513 ... XArray: 6782340 of 6782364 tests passed ``` and exits 0. Running the xarray tests after this change requires a simpler invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ xarray ``` which on failure produces (colors omitted) ``` [09:50:53] ====================== check_reserve ====================== [09:50:53] [FAILED] param-0 [09:50:53] # check_reserve: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_xarray.c:536 [09:50:53] xa_erase(xa, 12345678) != NULL ... [09:50:53] # module: test_xarray [09:50:53] # xarray: pass:26 fail:3 skip:0 total:29 [09:50:53] # Totals: pass:28 fail:3 skip:0 total:31 [09:50:53] ===================== [FAILED] xarray ====================== ``` and exits 1. Use of richer kunit assertions is intentionally omitted to reduce the scope of the change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241205-xarray-kunit-port-v1-1-ee44bc7aa201@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com> Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-12-05 15:11:26 +00:00
static noinline void xa_store_many_order(struct kunit *test, struct xarray *xa,
unsigned long index, unsigned order)
{
XA_STATE_ORDER(xas, xa, index, order);
unsigned int i = 0;
do {
xas_lock(&xas);
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xas_find_conflict(&xas));
xas_create_range(&xas);
if (xas_error(&xas))
goto unlock;
for (i = 0; i < (1U << order); i++) {
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xas_store(&xas, xa_mk_index(index + i)));
xas_next(&xas);
}
unlock:
xas_unlock(&xas);
} while (xas_nomem(&xas, GFP_KERNEL));
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xas_error(&xas));
}
xarray: port tests to kunit Minimally rewrite the XArray unit tests to use kunit. This integrates nicely with existing kunit tools which produce nicer human-readable output compared to the existing machinery. Running the xarray tests before this change requires an obscure invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ --kconfig_add CONFIG_TEST_XARRAY=y --raw_output=all nothing ``` which on failure produces ``` BUG at check_reserve:513 ... XArray: 6782340 of 6782364 tests passed ``` and exits 0. Running the xarray tests after this change requires a simpler invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ xarray ``` which on failure produces (colors omitted) ``` [09:50:53] ====================== check_reserve ====================== [09:50:53] [FAILED] param-0 [09:50:53] # check_reserve: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_xarray.c:536 [09:50:53] xa_erase(xa, 12345678) != NULL ... [09:50:53] # module: test_xarray [09:50:53] # xarray: pass:26 fail:3 skip:0 total:29 [09:50:53] # Totals: pass:28 fail:3 skip:0 total:31 [09:50:53] ===================== [FAILED] xarray ====================== ``` and exits 1. Use of richer kunit assertions is intentionally omitted to reduce the scope of the change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241205-xarray-kunit-port-v1-1-ee44bc7aa201@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com> Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-12-05 15:11:26 +00:00
static noinline void check_create_range_1(struct kunit *test,
unsigned long index, unsigned order)
{
xarray: port tests to kunit Minimally rewrite the XArray unit tests to use kunit. This integrates nicely with existing kunit tools which produce nicer human-readable output compared to the existing machinery. Running the xarray tests before this change requires an obscure invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ --kconfig_add CONFIG_TEST_XARRAY=y --raw_output=all nothing ``` which on failure produces ``` BUG at check_reserve:513 ... XArray: 6782340 of 6782364 tests passed ``` and exits 0. Running the xarray tests after this change requires a simpler invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ xarray ``` which on failure produces (colors omitted) ``` [09:50:53] ====================== check_reserve ====================== [09:50:53] [FAILED] param-0 [09:50:53] # check_reserve: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_xarray.c:536 [09:50:53] xa_erase(xa, 12345678) != NULL ... [09:50:53] # module: test_xarray [09:50:53] # xarray: pass:26 fail:3 skip:0 total:29 [09:50:53] # Totals: pass:28 fail:3 skip:0 total:31 [09:50:53] ===================== [FAILED] xarray ====================== ``` and exits 1. Use of richer kunit assertions is intentionally omitted to reduce the scope of the change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241205-xarray-kunit-port-v1-1-ee44bc7aa201@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com> Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-12-05 15:11:26 +00:00
struct xarray *xa = xa_param(test);
unsigned long i;
xarray: port tests to kunit Minimally rewrite the XArray unit tests to use kunit. This integrates nicely with existing kunit tools which produce nicer human-readable output compared to the existing machinery. Running the xarray tests before this change requires an obscure invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ --kconfig_add CONFIG_TEST_XARRAY=y --raw_output=all nothing ``` which on failure produces ``` BUG at check_reserve:513 ... XArray: 6782340 of 6782364 tests passed ``` and exits 0. Running the xarray tests after this change requires a simpler invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ xarray ``` which on failure produces (colors omitted) ``` [09:50:53] ====================== check_reserve ====================== [09:50:53] [FAILED] param-0 [09:50:53] # check_reserve: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_xarray.c:536 [09:50:53] xa_erase(xa, 12345678) != NULL ... [09:50:53] # module: test_xarray [09:50:53] # xarray: pass:26 fail:3 skip:0 total:29 [09:50:53] # Totals: pass:28 fail:3 skip:0 total:31 [09:50:53] ===================== [FAILED] xarray ====================== ``` and exits 1. Use of richer kunit assertions is intentionally omitted to reduce the scope of the change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241205-xarray-kunit-port-v1-1-ee44bc7aa201@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com> Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-12-05 15:11:26 +00:00
xa_store_many_order(test, xa, index, order);
for (i = index; i < index + (1UL << order); i++)
xarray: port tests to kunit Minimally rewrite the XArray unit tests to use kunit. This integrates nicely with existing kunit tools which produce nicer human-readable output compared to the existing machinery. Running the xarray tests before this change requires an obscure invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ --kconfig_add CONFIG_TEST_XARRAY=y --raw_output=all nothing ``` which on failure produces ``` BUG at check_reserve:513 ... XArray: 6782340 of 6782364 tests passed ``` and exits 0. Running the xarray tests after this change requires a simpler invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ xarray ``` which on failure produces (colors omitted) ``` [09:50:53] ====================== check_reserve ====================== [09:50:53] [FAILED] param-0 [09:50:53] # check_reserve: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_xarray.c:536 [09:50:53] xa_erase(xa, 12345678) != NULL ... [09:50:53] # module: test_xarray [09:50:53] # xarray: pass:26 fail:3 skip:0 total:29 [09:50:53] # Totals: pass:28 fail:3 skip:0 total:31 [09:50:53] ===================== [FAILED] xarray ====================== ``` and exits 1. Use of richer kunit assertions is intentionally omitted to reduce the scope of the change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241205-xarray-kunit-port-v1-1-ee44bc7aa201@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com> Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-12-05 15:11:26 +00:00
xa_erase_index(test, xa, i);
XA_BUG_ON(xa, !xa_empty(xa));
}
xarray: port tests to kunit Minimally rewrite the XArray unit tests to use kunit. This integrates nicely with existing kunit tools which produce nicer human-readable output compared to the existing machinery. Running the xarray tests before this change requires an obscure invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ --kconfig_add CONFIG_TEST_XARRAY=y --raw_output=all nothing ``` which on failure produces ``` BUG at check_reserve:513 ... XArray: 6782340 of 6782364 tests passed ``` and exits 0. Running the xarray tests after this change requires a simpler invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ xarray ``` which on failure produces (colors omitted) ``` [09:50:53] ====================== check_reserve ====================== [09:50:53] [FAILED] param-0 [09:50:53] # check_reserve: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_xarray.c:536 [09:50:53] xa_erase(xa, 12345678) != NULL ... [09:50:53] # module: test_xarray [09:50:53] # xarray: pass:26 fail:3 skip:0 total:29 [09:50:53] # Totals: pass:28 fail:3 skip:0 total:31 [09:50:53] ===================== [FAILED] xarray ====================== ``` and exits 1. Use of richer kunit assertions is intentionally omitted to reduce the scope of the change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241205-xarray-kunit-port-v1-1-ee44bc7aa201@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com> Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-12-05 15:11:26 +00:00
static noinline void check_create_range_2(struct kunit *test, unsigned int order)
{
xarray: port tests to kunit Minimally rewrite the XArray unit tests to use kunit. This integrates nicely with existing kunit tools which produce nicer human-readable output compared to the existing machinery. Running the xarray tests before this change requires an obscure invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ --kconfig_add CONFIG_TEST_XARRAY=y --raw_output=all nothing ``` which on failure produces ``` BUG at check_reserve:513 ... XArray: 6782340 of 6782364 tests passed ``` and exits 0. Running the xarray tests after this change requires a simpler invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ xarray ``` which on failure produces (colors omitted) ``` [09:50:53] ====================== check_reserve ====================== [09:50:53] [FAILED] param-0 [09:50:53] # check_reserve: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_xarray.c:536 [09:50:53] xa_erase(xa, 12345678) != NULL ... [09:50:53] # module: test_xarray [09:50:53] # xarray: pass:26 fail:3 skip:0 total:29 [09:50:53] # Totals: pass:28 fail:3 skip:0 total:31 [09:50:53] ===================== [FAILED] xarray ====================== ``` and exits 1. Use of richer kunit assertions is intentionally omitted to reduce the scope of the change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241205-xarray-kunit-port-v1-1-ee44bc7aa201@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com> Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-12-05 15:11:26 +00:00
struct xarray *xa = xa_param(test);
unsigned long i;
unsigned long nr = 1UL << order;
for (i = 0; i < nr * nr; i += nr)
xarray: port tests to kunit Minimally rewrite the XArray unit tests to use kunit. This integrates nicely with existing kunit tools which produce nicer human-readable output compared to the existing machinery. Running the xarray tests before this change requires an obscure invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ --kconfig_add CONFIG_TEST_XARRAY=y --raw_output=all nothing ``` which on failure produces ``` BUG at check_reserve:513 ... XArray: 6782340 of 6782364 tests passed ``` and exits 0. Running the xarray tests after this change requires a simpler invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ xarray ``` which on failure produces (colors omitted) ``` [09:50:53] ====================== check_reserve ====================== [09:50:53] [FAILED] param-0 [09:50:53] # check_reserve: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_xarray.c:536 [09:50:53] xa_erase(xa, 12345678) != NULL ... [09:50:53] # module: test_xarray [09:50:53] # xarray: pass:26 fail:3 skip:0 total:29 [09:50:53] # Totals: pass:28 fail:3 skip:0 total:31 [09:50:53] ===================== [FAILED] xarray ====================== ``` and exits 1. Use of richer kunit assertions is intentionally omitted to reduce the scope of the change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241205-xarray-kunit-port-v1-1-ee44bc7aa201@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com> Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-12-05 15:11:26 +00:00
xa_store_many_order(test, xa, i, order);
for (i = 0; i < nr * nr; i++)
xarray: port tests to kunit Minimally rewrite the XArray unit tests to use kunit. This integrates nicely with existing kunit tools which produce nicer human-readable output compared to the existing machinery. Running the xarray tests before this change requires an obscure invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ --kconfig_add CONFIG_TEST_XARRAY=y --raw_output=all nothing ``` which on failure produces ``` BUG at check_reserve:513 ... XArray: 6782340 of 6782364 tests passed ``` and exits 0. Running the xarray tests after this change requires a simpler invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ xarray ``` which on failure produces (colors omitted) ``` [09:50:53] ====================== check_reserve ====================== [09:50:53] [FAILED] param-0 [09:50:53] # check_reserve: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_xarray.c:536 [09:50:53] xa_erase(xa, 12345678) != NULL ... [09:50:53] # module: test_xarray [09:50:53] # xarray: pass:26 fail:3 skip:0 total:29 [09:50:53] # Totals: pass:28 fail:3 skip:0 total:31 [09:50:53] ===================== [FAILED] xarray ====================== ``` and exits 1. Use of richer kunit assertions is intentionally omitted to reduce the scope of the change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241205-xarray-kunit-port-v1-1-ee44bc7aa201@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com> Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-12-05 15:11:26 +00:00
xa_erase_index(test, xa, i);
XA_BUG_ON(xa, !xa_empty(xa));
}
xarray: port tests to kunit Minimally rewrite the XArray unit tests to use kunit. This integrates nicely with existing kunit tools which produce nicer human-readable output compared to the existing machinery. Running the xarray tests before this change requires an obscure invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ --kconfig_add CONFIG_TEST_XARRAY=y --raw_output=all nothing ``` which on failure produces ``` BUG at check_reserve:513 ... XArray: 6782340 of 6782364 tests passed ``` and exits 0. Running the xarray tests after this change requires a simpler invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ xarray ``` which on failure produces (colors omitted) ``` [09:50:53] ====================== check_reserve ====================== [09:50:53] [FAILED] param-0 [09:50:53] # check_reserve: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_xarray.c:536 [09:50:53] xa_erase(xa, 12345678) != NULL ... [09:50:53] # module: test_xarray [09:50:53] # xarray: pass:26 fail:3 skip:0 total:29 [09:50:53] # Totals: pass:28 fail:3 skip:0 total:31 [09:50:53] ===================== [FAILED] xarray ====================== ``` and exits 1. Use of richer kunit assertions is intentionally omitted to reduce the scope of the change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241205-xarray-kunit-port-v1-1-ee44bc7aa201@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com> Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-12-05 15:11:26 +00:00
static noinline void check_create_range_3(struct kunit *test)
{
XA_STATE(xas, NULL, 0);
xas_set_err(&xas, -EEXIST);
xas_create_range(&xas);
XA_BUG_ON(NULL, xas_error(&xas) != -EEXIST);
}
xarray: port tests to kunit Minimally rewrite the XArray unit tests to use kunit. This integrates nicely with existing kunit tools which produce nicer human-readable output compared to the existing machinery. Running the xarray tests before this change requires an obscure invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ --kconfig_add CONFIG_TEST_XARRAY=y --raw_output=all nothing ``` which on failure produces ``` BUG at check_reserve:513 ... XArray: 6782340 of 6782364 tests passed ``` and exits 0. Running the xarray tests after this change requires a simpler invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ xarray ``` which on failure produces (colors omitted) ``` [09:50:53] ====================== check_reserve ====================== [09:50:53] [FAILED] param-0 [09:50:53] # check_reserve: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_xarray.c:536 [09:50:53] xa_erase(xa, 12345678) != NULL ... [09:50:53] # module: test_xarray [09:50:53] # xarray: pass:26 fail:3 skip:0 total:29 [09:50:53] # Totals: pass:28 fail:3 skip:0 total:31 [09:50:53] ===================== [FAILED] xarray ====================== ``` and exits 1. Use of richer kunit assertions is intentionally omitted to reduce the scope of the change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241205-xarray-kunit-port-v1-1-ee44bc7aa201@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com> Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-12-05 15:11:26 +00:00
static noinline void check_create_range_4(struct kunit *test,
unsigned long index, unsigned order)
{
xarray: port tests to kunit Minimally rewrite the XArray unit tests to use kunit. This integrates nicely with existing kunit tools which produce nicer human-readable output compared to the existing machinery. Running the xarray tests before this change requires an obscure invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ --kconfig_add CONFIG_TEST_XARRAY=y --raw_output=all nothing ``` which on failure produces ``` BUG at check_reserve:513 ... XArray: 6782340 of 6782364 tests passed ``` and exits 0. Running the xarray tests after this change requires a simpler invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ xarray ``` which on failure produces (colors omitted) ``` [09:50:53] ====================== check_reserve ====================== [09:50:53] [FAILED] param-0 [09:50:53] # check_reserve: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_xarray.c:536 [09:50:53] xa_erase(xa, 12345678) != NULL ... [09:50:53] # module: test_xarray [09:50:53] # xarray: pass:26 fail:3 skip:0 total:29 [09:50:53] # Totals: pass:28 fail:3 skip:0 total:31 [09:50:53] ===================== [FAILED] xarray ====================== ``` and exits 1. Use of richer kunit assertions is intentionally omitted to reduce the scope of the change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241205-xarray-kunit-port-v1-1-ee44bc7aa201@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com> Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-12-05 15:11:26 +00:00
struct xarray *xa = xa_param(test);
XA_STATE_ORDER(xas, xa, index, order);
unsigned long base = xas.xa_index;
unsigned long i = 0;
xa_store_index(xa, index, GFP_KERNEL);
do {
xas_lock(&xas);
xas_create_range(&xas);
if (xas_error(&xas))
goto unlock;
for (i = 0; i < (1UL << order); i++) {
void *old = xas_store(&xas, xa_mk_index(base + i));
if (xas.xa_index == index)
XA_BUG_ON(xa, old != xa_mk_index(base + i));
else
XA_BUG_ON(xa, old != NULL);
xas_next(&xas);
}
unlock:
xas_unlock(&xas);
} while (xas_nomem(&xas, GFP_KERNEL));
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xas_error(&xas));
for (i = base; i < base + (1UL << order); i++)
xarray: port tests to kunit Minimally rewrite the XArray unit tests to use kunit. This integrates nicely with existing kunit tools which produce nicer human-readable output compared to the existing machinery. Running the xarray tests before this change requires an obscure invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ --kconfig_add CONFIG_TEST_XARRAY=y --raw_output=all nothing ``` which on failure produces ``` BUG at check_reserve:513 ... XArray: 6782340 of 6782364 tests passed ``` and exits 0. Running the xarray tests after this change requires a simpler invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ xarray ``` which on failure produces (colors omitted) ``` [09:50:53] ====================== check_reserve ====================== [09:50:53] [FAILED] param-0 [09:50:53] # check_reserve: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_xarray.c:536 [09:50:53] xa_erase(xa, 12345678) != NULL ... [09:50:53] # module: test_xarray [09:50:53] # xarray: pass:26 fail:3 skip:0 total:29 [09:50:53] # Totals: pass:28 fail:3 skip:0 total:31 [09:50:53] ===================== [FAILED] xarray ====================== ``` and exits 1. Use of richer kunit assertions is intentionally omitted to reduce the scope of the change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241205-xarray-kunit-port-v1-1-ee44bc7aa201@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com> Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-12-05 15:11:26 +00:00
xa_erase_index(test, xa, i);
XA_BUG_ON(xa, !xa_empty(xa));
}
xarray: port tests to kunit Minimally rewrite the XArray unit tests to use kunit. This integrates nicely with existing kunit tools which produce nicer human-readable output compared to the existing machinery. Running the xarray tests before this change requires an obscure invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ --kconfig_add CONFIG_TEST_XARRAY=y --raw_output=all nothing ``` which on failure produces ``` BUG at check_reserve:513 ... XArray: 6782340 of 6782364 tests passed ``` and exits 0. Running the xarray tests after this change requires a simpler invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ xarray ``` which on failure produces (colors omitted) ``` [09:50:53] ====================== check_reserve ====================== [09:50:53] [FAILED] param-0 [09:50:53] # check_reserve: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_xarray.c:536 [09:50:53] xa_erase(xa, 12345678) != NULL ... [09:50:53] # module: test_xarray [09:50:53] # xarray: pass:26 fail:3 skip:0 total:29 [09:50:53] # Totals: pass:28 fail:3 skip:0 total:31 [09:50:53] ===================== [FAILED] xarray ====================== ``` and exits 1. Use of richer kunit assertions is intentionally omitted to reduce the scope of the change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241205-xarray-kunit-port-v1-1-ee44bc7aa201@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com> Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-12-05 15:11:26 +00:00
static noinline void check_create_range_5(struct kunit *test,
unsigned long index, unsigned int order)
{
xarray: port tests to kunit Minimally rewrite the XArray unit tests to use kunit. This integrates nicely with existing kunit tools which produce nicer human-readable output compared to the existing machinery. Running the xarray tests before this change requires an obscure invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ --kconfig_add CONFIG_TEST_XARRAY=y --raw_output=all nothing ``` which on failure produces ``` BUG at check_reserve:513 ... XArray: 6782340 of 6782364 tests passed ``` and exits 0. Running the xarray tests after this change requires a simpler invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ xarray ``` which on failure produces (colors omitted) ``` [09:50:53] ====================== check_reserve ====================== [09:50:53] [FAILED] param-0 [09:50:53] # check_reserve: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_xarray.c:536 [09:50:53] xa_erase(xa, 12345678) != NULL ... [09:50:53] # module: test_xarray [09:50:53] # xarray: pass:26 fail:3 skip:0 total:29 [09:50:53] # Totals: pass:28 fail:3 skip:0 total:31 [09:50:53] ===================== [FAILED] xarray ====================== ``` and exits 1. Use of richer kunit assertions is intentionally omitted to reduce the scope of the change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241205-xarray-kunit-port-v1-1-ee44bc7aa201@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com> Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-12-05 15:11:26 +00:00
struct xarray *xa = xa_param(test);
XA_STATE_ORDER(xas, xa, index, order);
unsigned int i;
xa_store_order(xa, index, order, xa_mk_index(index), GFP_KERNEL);
for (i = 0; i < order + 10; i++) {
do {
xas_lock(&xas);
xas_create_range(&xas);
xas_unlock(&xas);
} while (xas_nomem(&xas, GFP_KERNEL));
}
xa_destroy(xa);
}
xarray: port tests to kunit Minimally rewrite the XArray unit tests to use kunit. This integrates nicely with existing kunit tools which produce nicer human-readable output compared to the existing machinery. Running the xarray tests before this change requires an obscure invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ --kconfig_add CONFIG_TEST_XARRAY=y --raw_output=all nothing ``` which on failure produces ``` BUG at check_reserve:513 ... XArray: 6782340 of 6782364 tests passed ``` and exits 0. Running the xarray tests after this change requires a simpler invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ xarray ``` which on failure produces (colors omitted) ``` [09:50:53] ====================== check_reserve ====================== [09:50:53] [FAILED] param-0 [09:50:53] # check_reserve: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_xarray.c:536 [09:50:53] xa_erase(xa, 12345678) != NULL ... [09:50:53] # module: test_xarray [09:50:53] # xarray: pass:26 fail:3 skip:0 total:29 [09:50:53] # Totals: pass:28 fail:3 skip:0 total:31 [09:50:53] ===================== [FAILED] xarray ====================== ``` and exits 1. Use of richer kunit assertions is intentionally omitted to reduce the scope of the change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241205-xarray-kunit-port-v1-1-ee44bc7aa201@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com> Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-12-05 15:11:26 +00:00
static noinline void check_create_range(struct kunit *test)
{
unsigned int order;
unsigned int max_order = IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_XARRAY_MULTI) ? 12 : 1;
for (order = 0; order < max_order; order++) {
xarray: port tests to kunit Minimally rewrite the XArray unit tests to use kunit. This integrates nicely with existing kunit tools which produce nicer human-readable output compared to the existing machinery. Running the xarray tests before this change requires an obscure invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ --kconfig_add CONFIG_TEST_XARRAY=y --raw_output=all nothing ``` which on failure produces ``` BUG at check_reserve:513 ... XArray: 6782340 of 6782364 tests passed ``` and exits 0. Running the xarray tests after this change requires a simpler invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ xarray ``` which on failure produces (colors omitted) ``` [09:50:53] ====================== check_reserve ====================== [09:50:53] [FAILED] param-0 [09:50:53] # check_reserve: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_xarray.c:536 [09:50:53] xa_erase(xa, 12345678) != NULL ... [09:50:53] # module: test_xarray [09:50:53] # xarray: pass:26 fail:3 skip:0 total:29 [09:50:53] # Totals: pass:28 fail:3 skip:0 total:31 [09:50:53] ===================== [FAILED] xarray ====================== ``` and exits 1. Use of richer kunit assertions is intentionally omitted to reduce the scope of the change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241205-xarray-kunit-port-v1-1-ee44bc7aa201@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com> Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-12-05 15:11:26 +00:00
check_create_range_1(test, 0, order);
check_create_range_1(test, 1U << order, order);
check_create_range_1(test, 2U << order, order);
check_create_range_1(test, 3U << order, order);
check_create_range_1(test, 1U << 24, order);
if (order < 10)
xarray: port tests to kunit Minimally rewrite the XArray unit tests to use kunit. This integrates nicely with existing kunit tools which produce nicer human-readable output compared to the existing machinery. Running the xarray tests before this change requires an obscure invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ --kconfig_add CONFIG_TEST_XARRAY=y --raw_output=all nothing ``` which on failure produces ``` BUG at check_reserve:513 ... XArray: 6782340 of 6782364 tests passed ``` and exits 0. Running the xarray tests after this change requires a simpler invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ xarray ``` which on failure produces (colors omitted) ``` [09:50:53] ====================== check_reserve ====================== [09:50:53] [FAILED] param-0 [09:50:53] # check_reserve: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_xarray.c:536 [09:50:53] xa_erase(xa, 12345678) != NULL ... [09:50:53] # module: test_xarray [09:50:53] # xarray: pass:26 fail:3 skip:0 total:29 [09:50:53] # Totals: pass:28 fail:3 skip:0 total:31 [09:50:53] ===================== [FAILED] xarray ====================== ``` and exits 1. Use of richer kunit assertions is intentionally omitted to reduce the scope of the change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241205-xarray-kunit-port-v1-1-ee44bc7aa201@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com> Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-12-05 15:11:26 +00:00
check_create_range_2(test, order);
check_create_range_4(test, 0, order);
check_create_range_4(test, 1U << order, order);
check_create_range_4(test, 2U << order, order);
check_create_range_4(test, 3U << order, order);
check_create_range_4(test, 1U << 24, order);
check_create_range_4(test, 1, order);
check_create_range_4(test, (1U << order) + 1, order);
check_create_range_4(test, (2U << order) + 1, order);
check_create_range_4(test, (2U << order) - 1, order);
check_create_range_4(test, (3U << order) + 1, order);
check_create_range_4(test, (3U << order) - 1, order);
check_create_range_4(test, (1U << 24) + 1, order);
check_create_range_5(test, 0, order);
check_create_range_5(test, (1U << order), order);
}
xarray: port tests to kunit Minimally rewrite the XArray unit tests to use kunit. This integrates nicely with existing kunit tools which produce nicer human-readable output compared to the existing machinery. Running the xarray tests before this change requires an obscure invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ --kconfig_add CONFIG_TEST_XARRAY=y --raw_output=all nothing ``` which on failure produces ``` BUG at check_reserve:513 ... XArray: 6782340 of 6782364 tests passed ``` and exits 0. Running the xarray tests after this change requires a simpler invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ xarray ``` which on failure produces (colors omitted) ``` [09:50:53] ====================== check_reserve ====================== [09:50:53] [FAILED] param-0 [09:50:53] # check_reserve: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_xarray.c:536 [09:50:53] xa_erase(xa, 12345678) != NULL ... [09:50:53] # module: test_xarray [09:50:53] # xarray: pass:26 fail:3 skip:0 total:29 [09:50:53] # Totals: pass:28 fail:3 skip:0 total:31 [09:50:53] ===================== [FAILED] xarray ====================== ``` and exits 1. Use of richer kunit assertions is intentionally omitted to reduce the scope of the change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241205-xarray-kunit-port-v1-1-ee44bc7aa201@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com> Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-12-05 15:11:26 +00:00
check_create_range_3(test);
}
xarray: port tests to kunit Minimally rewrite the XArray unit tests to use kunit. This integrates nicely with existing kunit tools which produce nicer human-readable output compared to the existing machinery. Running the xarray tests before this change requires an obscure invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ --kconfig_add CONFIG_TEST_XARRAY=y --raw_output=all nothing ``` which on failure produces ``` BUG at check_reserve:513 ... XArray: 6782340 of 6782364 tests passed ``` and exits 0. Running the xarray tests after this change requires a simpler invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ xarray ``` which on failure produces (colors omitted) ``` [09:50:53] ====================== check_reserve ====================== [09:50:53] [FAILED] param-0 [09:50:53] # check_reserve: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_xarray.c:536 [09:50:53] xa_erase(xa, 12345678) != NULL ... [09:50:53] # module: test_xarray [09:50:53] # xarray: pass:26 fail:3 skip:0 total:29 [09:50:53] # Totals: pass:28 fail:3 skip:0 total:31 [09:50:53] ===================== [FAILED] xarray ====================== ``` and exits 1. Use of richer kunit assertions is intentionally omitted to reduce the scope of the change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241205-xarray-kunit-port-v1-1-ee44bc7aa201@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com> Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-12-05 15:11:26 +00:00
static noinline void __check_store_range(struct kunit *test, unsigned long first,
unsigned long last)
{
xarray: port tests to kunit Minimally rewrite the XArray unit tests to use kunit. This integrates nicely with existing kunit tools which produce nicer human-readable output compared to the existing machinery. Running the xarray tests before this change requires an obscure invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ --kconfig_add CONFIG_TEST_XARRAY=y --raw_output=all nothing ``` which on failure produces ``` BUG at check_reserve:513 ... XArray: 6782340 of 6782364 tests passed ``` and exits 0. Running the xarray tests after this change requires a simpler invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ xarray ``` which on failure produces (colors omitted) ``` [09:50:53] ====================== check_reserve ====================== [09:50:53] [FAILED] param-0 [09:50:53] # check_reserve: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_xarray.c:536 [09:50:53] xa_erase(xa, 12345678) != NULL ... [09:50:53] # module: test_xarray [09:50:53] # xarray: pass:26 fail:3 skip:0 total:29 [09:50:53] # Totals: pass:28 fail:3 skip:0 total:31 [09:50:53] ===================== [FAILED] xarray ====================== ``` and exits 1. Use of richer kunit assertions is intentionally omitted to reduce the scope of the change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241205-xarray-kunit-port-v1-1-ee44bc7aa201@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com> Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-12-05 15:11:26 +00:00
struct xarray *xa = xa_param(test);
#ifdef CONFIG_XARRAY_MULTI
xa_store_range(xa, first, last, xa_mk_index(first), GFP_KERNEL);
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_load(xa, first) != xa_mk_index(first));
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_load(xa, last) != xa_mk_index(first));
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_load(xa, first - 1) != NULL);
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_load(xa, last + 1) != NULL);
xa_store_range(xa, first, last, NULL, GFP_KERNEL);
#endif
XA_BUG_ON(xa, !xa_empty(xa));
}
xarray: port tests to kunit Minimally rewrite the XArray unit tests to use kunit. This integrates nicely with existing kunit tools which produce nicer human-readable output compared to the existing machinery. Running the xarray tests before this change requires an obscure invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ --kconfig_add CONFIG_TEST_XARRAY=y --raw_output=all nothing ``` which on failure produces ``` BUG at check_reserve:513 ... XArray: 6782340 of 6782364 tests passed ``` and exits 0. Running the xarray tests after this change requires a simpler invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ xarray ``` which on failure produces (colors omitted) ``` [09:50:53] ====================== check_reserve ====================== [09:50:53] [FAILED] param-0 [09:50:53] # check_reserve: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_xarray.c:536 [09:50:53] xa_erase(xa, 12345678) != NULL ... [09:50:53] # module: test_xarray [09:50:53] # xarray: pass:26 fail:3 skip:0 total:29 [09:50:53] # Totals: pass:28 fail:3 skip:0 total:31 [09:50:53] ===================== [FAILED] xarray ====================== ``` and exits 1. Use of richer kunit assertions is intentionally omitted to reduce the scope of the change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241205-xarray-kunit-port-v1-1-ee44bc7aa201@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com> Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-12-05 15:11:26 +00:00
static noinline void check_store_range(struct kunit *test)
{
unsigned long i, j;
for (i = 0; i < 128; i++) {
for (j = i; j < 128; j++) {
xarray: port tests to kunit Minimally rewrite the XArray unit tests to use kunit. This integrates nicely with existing kunit tools which produce nicer human-readable output compared to the existing machinery. Running the xarray tests before this change requires an obscure invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ --kconfig_add CONFIG_TEST_XARRAY=y --raw_output=all nothing ``` which on failure produces ``` BUG at check_reserve:513 ... XArray: 6782340 of 6782364 tests passed ``` and exits 0. Running the xarray tests after this change requires a simpler invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ xarray ``` which on failure produces (colors omitted) ``` [09:50:53] ====================== check_reserve ====================== [09:50:53] [FAILED] param-0 [09:50:53] # check_reserve: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_xarray.c:536 [09:50:53] xa_erase(xa, 12345678) != NULL ... [09:50:53] # module: test_xarray [09:50:53] # xarray: pass:26 fail:3 skip:0 total:29 [09:50:53] # Totals: pass:28 fail:3 skip:0 total:31 [09:50:53] ===================== [FAILED] xarray ====================== ``` and exits 1. Use of richer kunit assertions is intentionally omitted to reduce the scope of the change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241205-xarray-kunit-port-v1-1-ee44bc7aa201@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com> Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-12-05 15:11:26 +00:00
__check_store_range(test, i, j);
__check_store_range(test, 128 + i, 128 + j);
__check_store_range(test, 4095 + i, 4095 + j);
__check_store_range(test, 4096 + i, 4096 + j);
__check_store_range(test, 123456 + i, 123456 + j);
__check_store_range(test, (1 << 24) + i, (1 << 24) + j);
}
}
}
#ifdef CONFIG_XARRAY_MULTI
xarray: port tests to kunit Minimally rewrite the XArray unit tests to use kunit. This integrates nicely with existing kunit tools which produce nicer human-readable output compared to the existing machinery. Running the xarray tests before this change requires an obscure invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ --kconfig_add CONFIG_TEST_XARRAY=y --raw_output=all nothing ``` which on failure produces ``` BUG at check_reserve:513 ... XArray: 6782340 of 6782364 tests passed ``` and exits 0. Running the xarray tests after this change requires a simpler invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ xarray ``` which on failure produces (colors omitted) ``` [09:50:53] ====================== check_reserve ====================== [09:50:53] [FAILED] param-0 [09:50:53] # check_reserve: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_xarray.c:536 [09:50:53] xa_erase(xa, 12345678) != NULL ... [09:50:53] # module: test_xarray [09:50:53] # xarray: pass:26 fail:3 skip:0 total:29 [09:50:53] # Totals: pass:28 fail:3 skip:0 total:31 [09:50:53] ===================== [FAILED] xarray ====================== ``` and exits 1. Use of richer kunit assertions is intentionally omitted to reduce the scope of the change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241205-xarray-kunit-port-v1-1-ee44bc7aa201@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com> Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-12-05 15:11:26 +00:00
static void check_split_1(struct kunit *test, unsigned long index,
unsigned int order, unsigned int new_order)
{
xarray: port tests to kunit Minimally rewrite the XArray unit tests to use kunit. This integrates nicely with existing kunit tools which produce nicer human-readable output compared to the existing machinery. Running the xarray tests before this change requires an obscure invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ --kconfig_add CONFIG_TEST_XARRAY=y --raw_output=all nothing ``` which on failure produces ``` BUG at check_reserve:513 ... XArray: 6782340 of 6782364 tests passed ``` and exits 0. Running the xarray tests after this change requires a simpler invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ xarray ``` which on failure produces (colors omitted) ``` [09:50:53] ====================== check_reserve ====================== [09:50:53] [FAILED] param-0 [09:50:53] # check_reserve: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_xarray.c:536 [09:50:53] xa_erase(xa, 12345678) != NULL ... [09:50:53] # module: test_xarray [09:50:53] # xarray: pass:26 fail:3 skip:0 total:29 [09:50:53] # Totals: pass:28 fail:3 skip:0 total:31 [09:50:53] ===================== [FAILED] xarray ====================== ``` and exits 1. Use of richer kunit assertions is intentionally omitted to reduce the scope of the change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241205-xarray-kunit-port-v1-1-ee44bc7aa201@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com> Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-12-05 15:11:26 +00:00
struct xarray *xa = xa_param(test);
XA_STATE_ORDER(xas, xa, index, new_order);
unsigned int i, found;
void *entry;
xa_store_order(xa, index, order, xa, GFP_KERNEL);
xa_set_mark(xa, index, XA_MARK_1);
xas_split_alloc(&xas, xa, order, GFP_KERNEL);
xas_lock(&xas);
xas_split(&xas, xa, order);
for (i = 0; i < (1 << order); i += (1 << new_order))
__xa_store(xa, index + i, xa_mk_index(index + i), 0);
xas_unlock(&xas);
for (i = 0; i < (1 << order); i++) {
unsigned int val = index + (i & ~((1 << new_order) - 1));
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_load(xa, index + i) != xa_mk_index(val));
}
xa_set_mark(xa, index, XA_MARK_0);
XA_BUG_ON(xa, !xa_get_mark(xa, index, XA_MARK_0));
xas_set_order(&xas, index, 0);
found = 0;
rcu_read_lock();
xas_for_each_marked(&xas, entry, ULONG_MAX, XA_MARK_1) {
found++;
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_is_internal(entry));
}
rcu_read_unlock();
XA_BUG_ON(xa, found != 1 << (order - new_order));
xa_destroy(xa);
}
xarray: port tests to kunit Minimally rewrite the XArray unit tests to use kunit. This integrates nicely with existing kunit tools which produce nicer human-readable output compared to the existing machinery. Running the xarray tests before this change requires an obscure invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ --kconfig_add CONFIG_TEST_XARRAY=y --raw_output=all nothing ``` which on failure produces ``` BUG at check_reserve:513 ... XArray: 6782340 of 6782364 tests passed ``` and exits 0. Running the xarray tests after this change requires a simpler invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ xarray ``` which on failure produces (colors omitted) ``` [09:50:53] ====================== check_reserve ====================== [09:50:53] [FAILED] param-0 [09:50:53] # check_reserve: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_xarray.c:536 [09:50:53] xa_erase(xa, 12345678) != NULL ... [09:50:53] # module: test_xarray [09:50:53] # xarray: pass:26 fail:3 skip:0 total:29 [09:50:53] # Totals: pass:28 fail:3 skip:0 total:31 [09:50:53] ===================== [FAILED] xarray ====================== ``` and exits 1. Use of richer kunit assertions is intentionally omitted to reduce the scope of the change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241205-xarray-kunit-port-v1-1-ee44bc7aa201@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com> Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-12-05 15:11:26 +00:00
static noinline void check_split(struct kunit *test)
{
xarray: port tests to kunit Minimally rewrite the XArray unit tests to use kunit. This integrates nicely with existing kunit tools which produce nicer human-readable output compared to the existing machinery. Running the xarray tests before this change requires an obscure invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ --kconfig_add CONFIG_TEST_XARRAY=y --raw_output=all nothing ``` which on failure produces ``` BUG at check_reserve:513 ... XArray: 6782340 of 6782364 tests passed ``` and exits 0. Running the xarray tests after this change requires a simpler invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ xarray ``` which on failure produces (colors omitted) ``` [09:50:53] ====================== check_reserve ====================== [09:50:53] [FAILED] param-0 [09:50:53] # check_reserve: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_xarray.c:536 [09:50:53] xa_erase(xa, 12345678) != NULL ... [09:50:53] # module: test_xarray [09:50:53] # xarray: pass:26 fail:3 skip:0 total:29 [09:50:53] # Totals: pass:28 fail:3 skip:0 total:31 [09:50:53] ===================== [FAILED] xarray ====================== ``` and exits 1. Use of richer kunit assertions is intentionally omitted to reduce the scope of the change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241205-xarray-kunit-port-v1-1-ee44bc7aa201@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com> Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-12-05 15:11:26 +00:00
struct xarray *xa = xa_param(test);
unsigned int order, new_order;
XA_BUG_ON(xa, !xa_empty(xa));
for (order = 1; order < 2 * XA_CHUNK_SHIFT; order++) {
for (new_order = 0; new_order < order; new_order++) {
xarray: port tests to kunit Minimally rewrite the XArray unit tests to use kunit. This integrates nicely with existing kunit tools which produce nicer human-readable output compared to the existing machinery. Running the xarray tests before this change requires an obscure invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ --kconfig_add CONFIG_TEST_XARRAY=y --raw_output=all nothing ``` which on failure produces ``` BUG at check_reserve:513 ... XArray: 6782340 of 6782364 tests passed ``` and exits 0. Running the xarray tests after this change requires a simpler invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ xarray ``` which on failure produces (colors omitted) ``` [09:50:53] ====================== check_reserve ====================== [09:50:53] [FAILED] param-0 [09:50:53] # check_reserve: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_xarray.c:536 [09:50:53] xa_erase(xa, 12345678) != NULL ... [09:50:53] # module: test_xarray [09:50:53] # xarray: pass:26 fail:3 skip:0 total:29 [09:50:53] # Totals: pass:28 fail:3 skip:0 total:31 [09:50:53] ===================== [FAILED] xarray ====================== ``` and exits 1. Use of richer kunit assertions is intentionally omitted to reduce the scope of the change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241205-xarray-kunit-port-v1-1-ee44bc7aa201@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com> Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-12-05 15:11:26 +00:00
check_split_1(test, 0, order, new_order);
check_split_1(test, 1UL << order, order, new_order);
check_split_1(test, 3UL << order, order, new_order);
}
}
}
#else
xarray: port tests to kunit Minimally rewrite the XArray unit tests to use kunit. This integrates nicely with existing kunit tools which produce nicer human-readable output compared to the existing machinery. Running the xarray tests before this change requires an obscure invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ --kconfig_add CONFIG_TEST_XARRAY=y --raw_output=all nothing ``` which on failure produces ``` BUG at check_reserve:513 ... XArray: 6782340 of 6782364 tests passed ``` and exits 0. Running the xarray tests after this change requires a simpler invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ xarray ``` which on failure produces (colors omitted) ``` [09:50:53] ====================== check_reserve ====================== [09:50:53] [FAILED] param-0 [09:50:53] # check_reserve: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_xarray.c:536 [09:50:53] xa_erase(xa, 12345678) != NULL ... [09:50:53] # module: test_xarray [09:50:53] # xarray: pass:26 fail:3 skip:0 total:29 [09:50:53] # Totals: pass:28 fail:3 skip:0 total:31 [09:50:53] ===================== [FAILED] xarray ====================== ``` and exits 1. Use of richer kunit assertions is intentionally omitted to reduce the scope of the change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241205-xarray-kunit-port-v1-1-ee44bc7aa201@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com> Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-12-05 15:11:26 +00:00
static void check_split(struct kunit *test) { }
#endif
xarray: port tests to kunit Minimally rewrite the XArray unit tests to use kunit. This integrates nicely with existing kunit tools which produce nicer human-readable output compared to the existing machinery. Running the xarray tests before this change requires an obscure invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ --kconfig_add CONFIG_TEST_XARRAY=y --raw_output=all nothing ``` which on failure produces ``` BUG at check_reserve:513 ... XArray: 6782340 of 6782364 tests passed ``` and exits 0. Running the xarray tests after this change requires a simpler invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ xarray ``` which on failure produces (colors omitted) ``` [09:50:53] ====================== check_reserve ====================== [09:50:53] [FAILED] param-0 [09:50:53] # check_reserve: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_xarray.c:536 [09:50:53] xa_erase(xa, 12345678) != NULL ... [09:50:53] # module: test_xarray [09:50:53] # xarray: pass:26 fail:3 skip:0 total:29 [09:50:53] # Totals: pass:28 fail:3 skip:0 total:31 [09:50:53] ===================== [FAILED] xarray ====================== ``` and exits 1. Use of richer kunit assertions is intentionally omitted to reduce the scope of the change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241205-xarray-kunit-port-v1-1-ee44bc7aa201@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com> Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-12-05 15:11:26 +00:00
static void check_align_1(struct kunit *test, char *name)
{
xarray: port tests to kunit Minimally rewrite the XArray unit tests to use kunit. This integrates nicely with existing kunit tools which produce nicer human-readable output compared to the existing machinery. Running the xarray tests before this change requires an obscure invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ --kconfig_add CONFIG_TEST_XARRAY=y --raw_output=all nothing ``` which on failure produces ``` BUG at check_reserve:513 ... XArray: 6782340 of 6782364 tests passed ``` and exits 0. Running the xarray tests after this change requires a simpler invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ xarray ``` which on failure produces (colors omitted) ``` [09:50:53] ====================== check_reserve ====================== [09:50:53] [FAILED] param-0 [09:50:53] # check_reserve: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_xarray.c:536 [09:50:53] xa_erase(xa, 12345678) != NULL ... [09:50:53] # module: test_xarray [09:50:53] # xarray: pass:26 fail:3 skip:0 total:29 [09:50:53] # Totals: pass:28 fail:3 skip:0 total:31 [09:50:53] ===================== [FAILED] xarray ====================== ``` and exits 1. Use of richer kunit assertions is intentionally omitted to reduce the scope of the change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241205-xarray-kunit-port-v1-1-ee44bc7aa201@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com> Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-12-05 15:11:26 +00:00
struct xarray *xa = xa_param(test);
int i;
unsigned int id;
unsigned long index;
void *entry;
for (i = 0; i < 8; i++) {
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_alloc(xa, &id, name + i, xa_limit_32b,
GFP_KERNEL) != 0);
XA_BUG_ON(xa, id != i);
}
xa_for_each(xa, index, entry)
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_is_err(entry));
xa_destroy(xa);
}
/*
* We should always be able to store without allocating memory after
* reserving a slot.
*/
xarray: port tests to kunit Minimally rewrite the XArray unit tests to use kunit. This integrates nicely with existing kunit tools which produce nicer human-readable output compared to the existing machinery. Running the xarray tests before this change requires an obscure invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ --kconfig_add CONFIG_TEST_XARRAY=y --raw_output=all nothing ``` which on failure produces ``` BUG at check_reserve:513 ... XArray: 6782340 of 6782364 tests passed ``` and exits 0. Running the xarray tests after this change requires a simpler invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ xarray ``` which on failure produces (colors omitted) ``` [09:50:53] ====================== check_reserve ====================== [09:50:53] [FAILED] param-0 [09:50:53] # check_reserve: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_xarray.c:536 [09:50:53] xa_erase(xa, 12345678) != NULL ... [09:50:53] # module: test_xarray [09:50:53] # xarray: pass:26 fail:3 skip:0 total:29 [09:50:53] # Totals: pass:28 fail:3 skip:0 total:31 [09:50:53] ===================== [FAILED] xarray ====================== ``` and exits 1. Use of richer kunit assertions is intentionally omitted to reduce the scope of the change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241205-xarray-kunit-port-v1-1-ee44bc7aa201@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com> Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-12-05 15:11:26 +00:00
static void check_align_2(struct kunit *test, char *name)
{
xarray: port tests to kunit Minimally rewrite the XArray unit tests to use kunit. This integrates nicely with existing kunit tools which produce nicer human-readable output compared to the existing machinery. Running the xarray tests before this change requires an obscure invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ --kconfig_add CONFIG_TEST_XARRAY=y --raw_output=all nothing ``` which on failure produces ``` BUG at check_reserve:513 ... XArray: 6782340 of 6782364 tests passed ``` and exits 0. Running the xarray tests after this change requires a simpler invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ xarray ``` which on failure produces (colors omitted) ``` [09:50:53] ====================== check_reserve ====================== [09:50:53] [FAILED] param-0 [09:50:53] # check_reserve: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_xarray.c:536 [09:50:53] xa_erase(xa, 12345678) != NULL ... [09:50:53] # module: test_xarray [09:50:53] # xarray: pass:26 fail:3 skip:0 total:29 [09:50:53] # Totals: pass:28 fail:3 skip:0 total:31 [09:50:53] ===================== [FAILED] xarray ====================== ``` and exits 1. Use of richer kunit assertions is intentionally omitted to reduce the scope of the change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241205-xarray-kunit-port-v1-1-ee44bc7aa201@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com> Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-12-05 15:11:26 +00:00
struct xarray *xa = xa_param(test);
int i;
XA_BUG_ON(xa, !xa_empty(xa));
for (i = 0; i < 8; i++) {
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_store(xa, 0, name + i, GFP_KERNEL) != NULL);
xa_erase(xa, 0);
}
for (i = 0; i < 8; i++) {
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_reserve(xa, 0, GFP_KERNEL) != 0);
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_store(xa, 0, name + i, 0) != NULL);
xa_erase(xa, 0);
}
XA_BUG_ON(xa, !xa_empty(xa));
}
xarray: port tests to kunit Minimally rewrite the XArray unit tests to use kunit. This integrates nicely with existing kunit tools which produce nicer human-readable output compared to the existing machinery. Running the xarray tests before this change requires an obscure invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ --kconfig_add CONFIG_TEST_XARRAY=y --raw_output=all nothing ``` which on failure produces ``` BUG at check_reserve:513 ... XArray: 6782340 of 6782364 tests passed ``` and exits 0. Running the xarray tests after this change requires a simpler invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ xarray ``` which on failure produces (colors omitted) ``` [09:50:53] ====================== check_reserve ====================== [09:50:53] [FAILED] param-0 [09:50:53] # check_reserve: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_xarray.c:536 [09:50:53] xa_erase(xa, 12345678) != NULL ... [09:50:53] # module: test_xarray [09:50:53] # xarray: pass:26 fail:3 skip:0 total:29 [09:50:53] # Totals: pass:28 fail:3 skip:0 total:31 [09:50:53] ===================== [FAILED] xarray ====================== ``` and exits 1. Use of richer kunit assertions is intentionally omitted to reduce the scope of the change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241205-xarray-kunit-port-v1-1-ee44bc7aa201@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com> Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-12-05 15:11:26 +00:00
static noinline void check_align(struct kunit *test)
{
char name[] = "Motorola 68000";
xarray: port tests to kunit Minimally rewrite the XArray unit tests to use kunit. This integrates nicely with existing kunit tools which produce nicer human-readable output compared to the existing machinery. Running the xarray tests before this change requires an obscure invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ --kconfig_add CONFIG_TEST_XARRAY=y --raw_output=all nothing ``` which on failure produces ``` BUG at check_reserve:513 ... XArray: 6782340 of 6782364 tests passed ``` and exits 0. Running the xarray tests after this change requires a simpler invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ xarray ``` which on failure produces (colors omitted) ``` [09:50:53] ====================== check_reserve ====================== [09:50:53] [FAILED] param-0 [09:50:53] # check_reserve: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_xarray.c:536 [09:50:53] xa_erase(xa, 12345678) != NULL ... [09:50:53] # module: test_xarray [09:50:53] # xarray: pass:26 fail:3 skip:0 total:29 [09:50:53] # Totals: pass:28 fail:3 skip:0 total:31 [09:50:53] ===================== [FAILED] xarray ====================== ``` and exits 1. Use of richer kunit assertions is intentionally omitted to reduce the scope of the change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241205-xarray-kunit-port-v1-1-ee44bc7aa201@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com> Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-12-05 15:11:26 +00:00
check_align_1(test, name);
check_align_1(test, name + 1);
check_align_1(test, name + 2);
check_align_1(test, name + 3);
check_align_2(test, name);
}
static LIST_HEAD(shadow_nodes);
static void test_update_node(struct xa_node *node)
{
if (node->count && node->count == node->nr_values) {
if (list_empty(&node->private_list))
list_add(&shadow_nodes, &node->private_list);
} else {
if (!list_empty(&node->private_list))
list_del_init(&node->private_list);
}
}
xarray: port tests to kunit Minimally rewrite the XArray unit tests to use kunit. This integrates nicely with existing kunit tools which produce nicer human-readable output compared to the existing machinery. Running the xarray tests before this change requires an obscure invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ --kconfig_add CONFIG_TEST_XARRAY=y --raw_output=all nothing ``` which on failure produces ``` BUG at check_reserve:513 ... XArray: 6782340 of 6782364 tests passed ``` and exits 0. Running the xarray tests after this change requires a simpler invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ xarray ``` which on failure produces (colors omitted) ``` [09:50:53] ====================== check_reserve ====================== [09:50:53] [FAILED] param-0 [09:50:53] # check_reserve: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_xarray.c:536 [09:50:53] xa_erase(xa, 12345678) != NULL ... [09:50:53] # module: test_xarray [09:50:53] # xarray: pass:26 fail:3 skip:0 total:29 [09:50:53] # Totals: pass:28 fail:3 skip:0 total:31 [09:50:53] ===================== [FAILED] xarray ====================== ``` and exits 1. Use of richer kunit assertions is intentionally omitted to reduce the scope of the change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241205-xarray-kunit-port-v1-1-ee44bc7aa201@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com> Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-12-05 15:11:26 +00:00
static noinline void shadow_remove(struct kunit *test, struct xarray *xa)
{
struct xa_node *node;
xa_lock(xa);
while ((node = list_first_entry_or_null(&shadow_nodes,
struct xa_node, private_list))) {
XA_BUG_ON(xa, node->array != xa);
list_del_init(&node->private_list);
xa_delete_node(node, test_update_node);
}
xa_unlock(xa);
}
xarray: port tests to kunit Minimally rewrite the XArray unit tests to use kunit. This integrates nicely with existing kunit tools which produce nicer human-readable output compared to the existing machinery. Running the xarray tests before this change requires an obscure invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ --kconfig_add CONFIG_TEST_XARRAY=y --raw_output=all nothing ``` which on failure produces ``` BUG at check_reserve:513 ... XArray: 6782340 of 6782364 tests passed ``` and exits 0. Running the xarray tests after this change requires a simpler invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ xarray ``` which on failure produces (colors omitted) ``` [09:50:53] ====================== check_reserve ====================== [09:50:53] [FAILED] param-0 [09:50:53] # check_reserve: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_xarray.c:536 [09:50:53] xa_erase(xa, 12345678) != NULL ... [09:50:53] # module: test_xarray [09:50:53] # xarray: pass:26 fail:3 skip:0 total:29 [09:50:53] # Totals: pass:28 fail:3 skip:0 total:31 [09:50:53] ===================== [FAILED] xarray ====================== ``` and exits 1. Use of richer kunit assertions is intentionally omitted to reduce the scope of the change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241205-xarray-kunit-port-v1-1-ee44bc7aa201@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com> Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-12-05 15:11:26 +00:00
struct workingset_testcase {
struct xarray *xa;
unsigned long index;
};
static noinline void check_workingset(struct kunit *test)
{
xarray: port tests to kunit Minimally rewrite the XArray unit tests to use kunit. This integrates nicely with existing kunit tools which produce nicer human-readable output compared to the existing machinery. Running the xarray tests before this change requires an obscure invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ --kconfig_add CONFIG_TEST_XARRAY=y --raw_output=all nothing ``` which on failure produces ``` BUG at check_reserve:513 ... XArray: 6782340 of 6782364 tests passed ``` and exits 0. Running the xarray tests after this change requires a simpler invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ xarray ``` which on failure produces (colors omitted) ``` [09:50:53] ====================== check_reserve ====================== [09:50:53] [FAILED] param-0 [09:50:53] # check_reserve: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_xarray.c:536 [09:50:53] xa_erase(xa, 12345678) != NULL ... [09:50:53] # module: test_xarray [09:50:53] # xarray: pass:26 fail:3 skip:0 total:29 [09:50:53] # Totals: pass:28 fail:3 skip:0 total:31 [09:50:53] ===================== [FAILED] xarray ====================== ``` and exits 1. Use of richer kunit assertions is intentionally omitted to reduce the scope of the change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241205-xarray-kunit-port-v1-1-ee44bc7aa201@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com> Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-12-05 15:11:26 +00:00
struct workingset_testcase tc = *(struct workingset_testcase *)test->param_value;
struct xarray *xa = tc.xa;
unsigned long index = tc.index;
XA_STATE(xas, xa, index);
xas_set_update(&xas, test_update_node);
do {
xas_lock(&xas);
xas_store(&xas, xa_mk_value(0));
xas_next(&xas);
xas_store(&xas, xa_mk_value(1));
xas_unlock(&xas);
} while (xas_nomem(&xas, GFP_KERNEL));
XA_BUG_ON(xa, list_empty(&shadow_nodes));
xas_lock(&xas);
xas_next(&xas);
xas_store(&xas, &xas);
XA_BUG_ON(xa, !list_empty(&shadow_nodes));
xas_store(&xas, xa_mk_value(2));
xas_unlock(&xas);
XA_BUG_ON(xa, list_empty(&shadow_nodes));
xarray: port tests to kunit Minimally rewrite the XArray unit tests to use kunit. This integrates nicely with existing kunit tools which produce nicer human-readable output compared to the existing machinery. Running the xarray tests before this change requires an obscure invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ --kconfig_add CONFIG_TEST_XARRAY=y --raw_output=all nothing ``` which on failure produces ``` BUG at check_reserve:513 ... XArray: 6782340 of 6782364 tests passed ``` and exits 0. Running the xarray tests after this change requires a simpler invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ xarray ``` which on failure produces (colors omitted) ``` [09:50:53] ====================== check_reserve ====================== [09:50:53] [FAILED] param-0 [09:50:53] # check_reserve: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_xarray.c:536 [09:50:53] xa_erase(xa, 12345678) != NULL ... [09:50:53] # module: test_xarray [09:50:53] # xarray: pass:26 fail:3 skip:0 total:29 [09:50:53] # Totals: pass:28 fail:3 skip:0 total:31 [09:50:53] ===================== [FAILED] xarray ====================== ``` and exits 1. Use of richer kunit assertions is intentionally omitted to reduce the scope of the change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241205-xarray-kunit-port-v1-1-ee44bc7aa201@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com> Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-12-05 15:11:26 +00:00
shadow_remove(test, xa);
XA_BUG_ON(xa, !list_empty(&shadow_nodes));
XA_BUG_ON(xa, !xa_empty(xa));
}
/*
* Check that the pointer / value / sibling entries are accounted the
* way we expect them to be.
*/
xarray: port tests to kunit Minimally rewrite the XArray unit tests to use kunit. This integrates nicely with existing kunit tools which produce nicer human-readable output compared to the existing machinery. Running the xarray tests before this change requires an obscure invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ --kconfig_add CONFIG_TEST_XARRAY=y --raw_output=all nothing ``` which on failure produces ``` BUG at check_reserve:513 ... XArray: 6782340 of 6782364 tests passed ``` and exits 0. Running the xarray tests after this change requires a simpler invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ xarray ``` which on failure produces (colors omitted) ``` [09:50:53] ====================== check_reserve ====================== [09:50:53] [FAILED] param-0 [09:50:53] # check_reserve: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_xarray.c:536 [09:50:53] xa_erase(xa, 12345678) != NULL ... [09:50:53] # module: test_xarray [09:50:53] # xarray: pass:26 fail:3 skip:0 total:29 [09:50:53] # Totals: pass:28 fail:3 skip:0 total:31 [09:50:53] ===================== [FAILED] xarray ====================== ``` and exits 1. Use of richer kunit assertions is intentionally omitted to reduce the scope of the change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241205-xarray-kunit-port-v1-1-ee44bc7aa201@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com> Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-12-05 15:11:26 +00:00
static noinline void check_account(struct kunit *test)
{
#ifdef CONFIG_XARRAY_MULTI
xarray: port tests to kunit Minimally rewrite the XArray unit tests to use kunit. This integrates nicely with existing kunit tools which produce nicer human-readable output compared to the existing machinery. Running the xarray tests before this change requires an obscure invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ --kconfig_add CONFIG_TEST_XARRAY=y --raw_output=all nothing ``` which on failure produces ``` BUG at check_reserve:513 ... XArray: 6782340 of 6782364 tests passed ``` and exits 0. Running the xarray tests after this change requires a simpler invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ xarray ``` which on failure produces (colors omitted) ``` [09:50:53] ====================== check_reserve ====================== [09:50:53] [FAILED] param-0 [09:50:53] # check_reserve: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_xarray.c:536 [09:50:53] xa_erase(xa, 12345678) != NULL ... [09:50:53] # module: test_xarray [09:50:53] # xarray: pass:26 fail:3 skip:0 total:29 [09:50:53] # Totals: pass:28 fail:3 skip:0 total:31 [09:50:53] ===================== [FAILED] xarray ====================== ``` and exits 1. Use of richer kunit assertions is intentionally omitted to reduce the scope of the change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241205-xarray-kunit-port-v1-1-ee44bc7aa201@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com> Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-12-05 15:11:26 +00:00
struct xarray *xa = xa_param(test);
unsigned int order;
for (order = 1; order < 12; order++) {
XA_STATE(xas, xa, 1 << order);
xa_store_order(xa, 0, order, xa, GFP_KERNEL);
rcu_read_lock();
xas_load(&xas);
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xas.xa_node->count == 0);
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xas.xa_node->count > (1 << order));
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xas.xa_node->nr_values != 0);
rcu_read_unlock();
xa_store_order(xa, 1 << order, order, xa_mk_index(1UL << order),
GFP_KERNEL);
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xas.xa_node->count != xas.xa_node->nr_values * 2);
xa_erase(xa, 1 << order);
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xas.xa_node->nr_values != 0);
xa_erase(xa, 0);
XA_BUG_ON(xa, !xa_empty(xa));
}
#endif
}
xarray: port tests to kunit Minimally rewrite the XArray unit tests to use kunit. This integrates nicely with existing kunit tools which produce nicer human-readable output compared to the existing machinery. Running the xarray tests before this change requires an obscure invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ --kconfig_add CONFIG_TEST_XARRAY=y --raw_output=all nothing ``` which on failure produces ``` BUG at check_reserve:513 ... XArray: 6782340 of 6782364 tests passed ``` and exits 0. Running the xarray tests after this change requires a simpler invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ xarray ``` which on failure produces (colors omitted) ``` [09:50:53] ====================== check_reserve ====================== [09:50:53] [FAILED] param-0 [09:50:53] # check_reserve: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_xarray.c:536 [09:50:53] xa_erase(xa, 12345678) != NULL ... [09:50:53] # module: test_xarray [09:50:53] # xarray: pass:26 fail:3 skip:0 total:29 [09:50:53] # Totals: pass:28 fail:3 skip:0 total:31 [09:50:53] ===================== [FAILED] xarray ====================== ``` and exits 1. Use of richer kunit assertions is intentionally omitted to reduce the scope of the change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241205-xarray-kunit-port-v1-1-ee44bc7aa201@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com> Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-12-05 15:11:26 +00:00
static noinline void check_get_order(struct kunit *test)
2020-10-16 03:05:13 +00:00
{
xarray: port tests to kunit Minimally rewrite the XArray unit tests to use kunit. This integrates nicely with existing kunit tools which produce nicer human-readable output compared to the existing machinery. Running the xarray tests before this change requires an obscure invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ --kconfig_add CONFIG_TEST_XARRAY=y --raw_output=all nothing ``` which on failure produces ``` BUG at check_reserve:513 ... XArray: 6782340 of 6782364 tests passed ``` and exits 0. Running the xarray tests after this change requires a simpler invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ xarray ``` which on failure produces (colors omitted) ``` [09:50:53] ====================== check_reserve ====================== [09:50:53] [FAILED] param-0 [09:50:53] # check_reserve: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_xarray.c:536 [09:50:53] xa_erase(xa, 12345678) != NULL ... [09:50:53] # module: test_xarray [09:50:53] # xarray: pass:26 fail:3 skip:0 total:29 [09:50:53] # Totals: pass:28 fail:3 skip:0 total:31 [09:50:53] ===================== [FAILED] xarray ====================== ``` and exits 1. Use of richer kunit assertions is intentionally omitted to reduce the scope of the change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241205-xarray-kunit-port-v1-1-ee44bc7aa201@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com> Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-12-05 15:11:26 +00:00
struct xarray *xa = xa_param(test);
2020-10-16 03:05:13 +00:00
unsigned int max_order = IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_XARRAY_MULTI) ? 20 : 1;
unsigned int order;
unsigned long i, j;
for (i = 0; i < 3; i++)
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_get_order(xa, i) != 0);
for (order = 0; order < max_order; order++) {
for (i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
xa_store_order(xa, i << order, order,
xa_mk_index(i << order), GFP_KERNEL);
for (j = i << order; j < (i + 1) << order; j++)
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_get_order(xa, j) != order);
xa_erase(xa, i << order);
}
}
}
xarray: port tests to kunit Minimally rewrite the XArray unit tests to use kunit. This integrates nicely with existing kunit tools which produce nicer human-readable output compared to the existing machinery. Running the xarray tests before this change requires an obscure invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ --kconfig_add CONFIG_TEST_XARRAY=y --raw_output=all nothing ``` which on failure produces ``` BUG at check_reserve:513 ... XArray: 6782340 of 6782364 tests passed ``` and exits 0. Running the xarray tests after this change requires a simpler invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ xarray ``` which on failure produces (colors omitted) ``` [09:50:53] ====================== check_reserve ====================== [09:50:53] [FAILED] param-0 [09:50:53] # check_reserve: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_xarray.c:536 [09:50:53] xa_erase(xa, 12345678) != NULL ... [09:50:53] # module: test_xarray [09:50:53] # xarray: pass:26 fail:3 skip:0 total:29 [09:50:53] # Totals: pass:28 fail:3 skip:0 total:31 [09:50:53] ===================== [FAILED] xarray ====================== ``` and exits 1. Use of richer kunit assertions is intentionally omitted to reduce the scope of the change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241205-xarray-kunit-port-v1-1-ee44bc7aa201@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com> Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-12-05 15:11:26 +00:00
static noinline void check_xas_get_order(struct kunit *test)
{
xarray: port tests to kunit Minimally rewrite the XArray unit tests to use kunit. This integrates nicely with existing kunit tools which produce nicer human-readable output compared to the existing machinery. Running the xarray tests before this change requires an obscure invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ --kconfig_add CONFIG_TEST_XARRAY=y --raw_output=all nothing ``` which on failure produces ``` BUG at check_reserve:513 ... XArray: 6782340 of 6782364 tests passed ``` and exits 0. Running the xarray tests after this change requires a simpler invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ xarray ``` which on failure produces (colors omitted) ``` [09:50:53] ====================== check_reserve ====================== [09:50:53] [FAILED] param-0 [09:50:53] # check_reserve: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_xarray.c:536 [09:50:53] xa_erase(xa, 12345678) != NULL ... [09:50:53] # module: test_xarray [09:50:53] # xarray: pass:26 fail:3 skip:0 total:29 [09:50:53] # Totals: pass:28 fail:3 skip:0 total:31 [09:50:53] ===================== [FAILED] xarray ====================== ``` and exits 1. Use of richer kunit assertions is intentionally omitted to reduce the scope of the change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241205-xarray-kunit-port-v1-1-ee44bc7aa201@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com> Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-12-05 15:11:26 +00:00
struct xarray *xa = xa_param(test);
XA_STATE(xas, xa, 0);
unsigned int max_order = IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_XARRAY_MULTI) ? 20 : 1;
unsigned int order;
unsigned long i, j;
for (order = 0; order < max_order; order++) {
for (i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
xas_set_order(&xas, i << order, order);
do {
xas_lock(&xas);
xas_store(&xas, xa_mk_value(i));
xas_unlock(&xas);
} while (xas_nomem(&xas, GFP_KERNEL));
for (j = i << order; j < (i + 1) << order; j++) {
xas_set_order(&xas, j, 0);
rcu_read_lock();
xas_load(&xas);
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xas_get_order(&xas) != order);
rcu_read_unlock();
}
xas_lock(&xas);
xas_set_order(&xas, i << order, order);
xas_store(&xas, NULL);
xas_unlock(&xas);
}
}
}
xarray: port tests to kunit Minimally rewrite the XArray unit tests to use kunit. This integrates nicely with existing kunit tools which produce nicer human-readable output compared to the existing machinery. Running the xarray tests before this change requires an obscure invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ --kconfig_add CONFIG_TEST_XARRAY=y --raw_output=all nothing ``` which on failure produces ``` BUG at check_reserve:513 ... XArray: 6782340 of 6782364 tests passed ``` and exits 0. Running the xarray tests after this change requires a simpler invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ xarray ``` which on failure produces (colors omitted) ``` [09:50:53] ====================== check_reserve ====================== [09:50:53] [FAILED] param-0 [09:50:53] # check_reserve: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_xarray.c:536 [09:50:53] xa_erase(xa, 12345678) != NULL ... [09:50:53] # module: test_xarray [09:50:53] # xarray: pass:26 fail:3 skip:0 total:29 [09:50:53] # Totals: pass:28 fail:3 skip:0 total:31 [09:50:53] ===================== [FAILED] xarray ====================== ``` and exits 1. Use of richer kunit assertions is intentionally omitted to reduce the scope of the change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241205-xarray-kunit-port-v1-1-ee44bc7aa201@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com> Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-12-05 15:11:26 +00:00
static noinline void check_xas_conflict_get_order(struct kunit *test)
mm/filemap: optimize filemap folio adding Instead of doing multiple tree walks, do one optimism range check with lock hold, and exit if raced with another insertion. If a shadow exists, check it with a new xas_get_order helper before releasing the lock to avoid redundant tree walks for getting its order. Drop the lock and do the allocation only if a split is needed. In the best case, it only need to walk the tree once. If it needs to alloc and split, 3 walks are issued (One for first ranged conflict check and order retrieving, one for the second check after allocation, one for the insert after split). Testing with 4K pages, in an 8G cgroup, with 16G brd as block device: echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches fio -name=cached --numjobs=16 --filename=/mnt/test.img \ --buffered=1 --ioengine=mmap --rw=randread --time_based \ --ramp_time=30s --runtime=5m --group_reporting Before: bw ( MiB/s): min= 1027, max= 3520, per=100.00%, avg=2445.02, stdev=18.90, samples=8691 iops : min=263001, max=901288, avg=625924.36, stdev=4837.28, samples=8691 After (+7.3%): bw ( MiB/s): min= 493, max= 3947, per=100.00%, avg=2625.56, stdev=25.74, samples=8651 iops : min=126454, max=1010681, avg=672142.61, stdev=6590.48, samples=8651 Test result with THP (do a THP randread then switch to 4K page in hope it issues a lot of splitting): echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches fio -name=cached --numjobs=16 --filename=/mnt/test.img \ --buffered=1 --ioengine=mmap -thp=1 --readonly \ --rw=randread --time_based --ramp_time=30s --runtime=10m \ --group_reporting fio -name=cached --numjobs=16 --filename=/mnt/test.img \ --buffered=1 --ioengine=mmap \ --rw=randread --time_based --runtime=5s --group_reporting Before: bw ( KiB/s): min= 4141, max=14202, per=100.00%, avg=7935.51, stdev=96.85, samples=18976 iops : min= 1029, max= 3548, avg=1979.52, stdev=24.23, samples=18976· READ: bw=4545B/s (4545B/s), 4545B/s-4545B/s (4545B/s-4545B/s), io=64.0KiB (65.5kB), run=14419-14419msec After (+12.5%): bw ( KiB/s): min= 4611, max=15370, per=100.00%, avg=8928.74, stdev=105.17, samples=19146 iops : min= 1151, max= 3842, avg=2231.27, stdev=26.29, samples=19146 READ: bw=4635B/s (4635B/s), 4635B/s-4635B/s (4635B/s-4635B/s), io=64.0KiB (65.5kB), run=14137-14137msec The performance is better for both 4K (+7.5%) and THP (+12.5%) cached read. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240415171857.19244-5-ryncsn@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Kairui Song <kasong@tencent.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-04-15 17:18:56 +00:00
{
xarray: port tests to kunit Minimally rewrite the XArray unit tests to use kunit. This integrates nicely with existing kunit tools which produce nicer human-readable output compared to the existing machinery. Running the xarray tests before this change requires an obscure invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ --kconfig_add CONFIG_TEST_XARRAY=y --raw_output=all nothing ``` which on failure produces ``` BUG at check_reserve:513 ... XArray: 6782340 of 6782364 tests passed ``` and exits 0. Running the xarray tests after this change requires a simpler invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ xarray ``` which on failure produces (colors omitted) ``` [09:50:53] ====================== check_reserve ====================== [09:50:53] [FAILED] param-0 [09:50:53] # check_reserve: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_xarray.c:536 [09:50:53] xa_erase(xa, 12345678) != NULL ... [09:50:53] # module: test_xarray [09:50:53] # xarray: pass:26 fail:3 skip:0 total:29 [09:50:53] # Totals: pass:28 fail:3 skip:0 total:31 [09:50:53] ===================== [FAILED] xarray ====================== ``` and exits 1. Use of richer kunit assertions is intentionally omitted to reduce the scope of the change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241205-xarray-kunit-port-v1-1-ee44bc7aa201@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com> Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-12-05 15:11:26 +00:00
struct xarray *xa = xa_param(test);
mm/filemap: optimize filemap folio adding Instead of doing multiple tree walks, do one optimism range check with lock hold, and exit if raced with another insertion. If a shadow exists, check it with a new xas_get_order helper before releasing the lock to avoid redundant tree walks for getting its order. Drop the lock and do the allocation only if a split is needed. In the best case, it only need to walk the tree once. If it needs to alloc and split, 3 walks are issued (One for first ranged conflict check and order retrieving, one for the second check after allocation, one for the insert after split). Testing with 4K pages, in an 8G cgroup, with 16G brd as block device: echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches fio -name=cached --numjobs=16 --filename=/mnt/test.img \ --buffered=1 --ioengine=mmap --rw=randread --time_based \ --ramp_time=30s --runtime=5m --group_reporting Before: bw ( MiB/s): min= 1027, max= 3520, per=100.00%, avg=2445.02, stdev=18.90, samples=8691 iops : min=263001, max=901288, avg=625924.36, stdev=4837.28, samples=8691 After (+7.3%): bw ( MiB/s): min= 493, max= 3947, per=100.00%, avg=2625.56, stdev=25.74, samples=8651 iops : min=126454, max=1010681, avg=672142.61, stdev=6590.48, samples=8651 Test result with THP (do a THP randread then switch to 4K page in hope it issues a lot of splitting): echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches fio -name=cached --numjobs=16 --filename=/mnt/test.img \ --buffered=1 --ioengine=mmap -thp=1 --readonly \ --rw=randread --time_based --ramp_time=30s --runtime=10m \ --group_reporting fio -name=cached --numjobs=16 --filename=/mnt/test.img \ --buffered=1 --ioengine=mmap \ --rw=randread --time_based --runtime=5s --group_reporting Before: bw ( KiB/s): min= 4141, max=14202, per=100.00%, avg=7935.51, stdev=96.85, samples=18976 iops : min= 1029, max= 3548, avg=1979.52, stdev=24.23, samples=18976· READ: bw=4545B/s (4545B/s), 4545B/s-4545B/s (4545B/s-4545B/s), io=64.0KiB (65.5kB), run=14419-14419msec After (+12.5%): bw ( KiB/s): min= 4611, max=15370, per=100.00%, avg=8928.74, stdev=105.17, samples=19146 iops : min= 1151, max= 3842, avg=2231.27, stdev=26.29, samples=19146 READ: bw=4635B/s (4635B/s), 4635B/s-4635B/s (4635B/s-4635B/s), io=64.0KiB (65.5kB), run=14137-14137msec The performance is better for both 4K (+7.5%) and THP (+12.5%) cached read. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240415171857.19244-5-ryncsn@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Kairui Song <kasong@tencent.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-04-15 17:18:56 +00:00
XA_STATE(xas, xa, 0);
void *entry;
int only_once;
unsigned int max_order = IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_XARRAY_MULTI) ? 20 : 1;
unsigned int order;
unsigned long i, j, k;
for (order = 0; order < max_order; order++) {
for (i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
xas_set_order(&xas, i << order, order);
do {
xas_lock(&xas);
xas_store(&xas, xa_mk_value(i));
xas_unlock(&xas);
} while (xas_nomem(&xas, GFP_KERNEL));
/*
* Ensure xas_get_order works with xas_for_each_conflict.
*/
j = i << order;
for (k = 0; k < order; k++) {
only_once = 0;
xas_set_order(&xas, j + (1 << k), k);
xas_lock(&xas);
xas_for_each_conflict(&xas, entry) {
XA_BUG_ON(xa, entry != xa_mk_value(i));
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xas_get_order(&xas) != order);
only_once++;
}
XA_BUG_ON(xa, only_once != 1);
xas_unlock(&xas);
}
if (order < max_order - 1) {
only_once = 0;
xas_set_order(&xas, (i & ~1UL) << order, order + 1);
xas_lock(&xas);
xas_for_each_conflict(&xas, entry) {
XA_BUG_ON(xa, entry != xa_mk_value(i));
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xas_get_order(&xas) != order);
only_once++;
}
XA_BUG_ON(xa, only_once != 1);
xas_unlock(&xas);
}
xas_set_order(&xas, i << order, order);
xas_lock(&xas);
xas_store(&xas, NULL);
xas_unlock(&xas);
}
}
}
xarray: port tests to kunit Minimally rewrite the XArray unit tests to use kunit. This integrates nicely with existing kunit tools which produce nicer human-readable output compared to the existing machinery. Running the xarray tests before this change requires an obscure invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ --kconfig_add CONFIG_TEST_XARRAY=y --raw_output=all nothing ``` which on failure produces ``` BUG at check_reserve:513 ... XArray: 6782340 of 6782364 tests passed ``` and exits 0. Running the xarray tests after this change requires a simpler invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ xarray ``` which on failure produces (colors omitted) ``` [09:50:53] ====================== check_reserve ====================== [09:50:53] [FAILED] param-0 [09:50:53] # check_reserve: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_xarray.c:536 [09:50:53] xa_erase(xa, 12345678) != NULL ... [09:50:53] # module: test_xarray [09:50:53] # xarray: pass:26 fail:3 skip:0 total:29 [09:50:53] # Totals: pass:28 fail:3 skip:0 total:31 [09:50:53] ===================== [FAILED] xarray ====================== ``` and exits 1. Use of richer kunit assertions is intentionally omitted to reduce the scope of the change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241205-xarray-kunit-port-v1-1-ee44bc7aa201@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com> Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-12-05 15:11:26 +00:00
static noinline void check_destroy(struct kunit *test)
{
xarray: port tests to kunit Minimally rewrite the XArray unit tests to use kunit. This integrates nicely with existing kunit tools which produce nicer human-readable output compared to the existing machinery. Running the xarray tests before this change requires an obscure invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ --kconfig_add CONFIG_TEST_XARRAY=y --raw_output=all nothing ``` which on failure produces ``` BUG at check_reserve:513 ... XArray: 6782340 of 6782364 tests passed ``` and exits 0. Running the xarray tests after this change requires a simpler invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ xarray ``` which on failure produces (colors omitted) ``` [09:50:53] ====================== check_reserve ====================== [09:50:53] [FAILED] param-0 [09:50:53] # check_reserve: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_xarray.c:536 [09:50:53] xa_erase(xa, 12345678) != NULL ... [09:50:53] # module: test_xarray [09:50:53] # xarray: pass:26 fail:3 skip:0 total:29 [09:50:53] # Totals: pass:28 fail:3 skip:0 total:31 [09:50:53] ===================== [FAILED] xarray ====================== ``` and exits 1. Use of richer kunit assertions is intentionally omitted to reduce the scope of the change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241205-xarray-kunit-port-v1-1-ee44bc7aa201@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com> Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-12-05 15:11:26 +00:00
struct xarray *xa = xa_param(test);
unsigned long index;
XA_BUG_ON(xa, !xa_empty(xa));
/* Destroying an empty array is a no-op */
xa_destroy(xa);
XA_BUG_ON(xa, !xa_empty(xa));
/* Destroying an array with a single entry */
for (index = 0; index < 1000; index++) {
xa_store_index(xa, index, GFP_KERNEL);
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_empty(xa));
xa_destroy(xa);
XA_BUG_ON(xa, !xa_empty(xa));
}
/* Destroying an array with a single entry at ULONG_MAX */
xa_store(xa, ULONG_MAX, xa, GFP_KERNEL);
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_empty(xa));
xa_destroy(xa);
XA_BUG_ON(xa, !xa_empty(xa));
#ifdef CONFIG_XARRAY_MULTI
/* Destroying an array with a multi-index entry */
xa_store_order(xa, 1 << 11, 11, xa, GFP_KERNEL);
XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_empty(xa));
xa_destroy(xa);
XA_BUG_ON(xa, !xa_empty(xa));
#endif
}
static DEFINE_XARRAY(array);
xarray: port tests to kunit Minimally rewrite the XArray unit tests to use kunit. This integrates nicely with existing kunit tools which produce nicer human-readable output compared to the existing machinery. Running the xarray tests before this change requires an obscure invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ --kconfig_add CONFIG_TEST_XARRAY=y --raw_output=all nothing ``` which on failure produces ``` BUG at check_reserve:513 ... XArray: 6782340 of 6782364 tests passed ``` and exits 0. Running the xarray tests after this change requires a simpler invocation ``` tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --arch arm64 --make_options LLVM=1 \ xarray ``` which on failure produces (colors omitted) ``` [09:50:53] ====================== check_reserve ====================== [09:50:53] [FAILED] param-0 [09:50:53] # check_reserve: EXPECTATION FAILED at lib/test_xarray.c:536 [09:50:53] xa_erase(xa, 12345678) != NULL ... [09:50:53] # module: test_xarray [09:50:53] # xarray: pass:26 fail:3 skip:0 total:29 [09:50:53] # Totals: pass:28 fail:3 skip:0 total:31 [09:50:53] ===================== [FAILED] xarray ====================== ``` and exits 1. Use of richer kunit assertions is intentionally omitted to reduce the scope of the change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241205-xarray-kunit-port-v1-1-ee44bc7aa201@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com> Cc: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com> Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Cc: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com> Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Naveen N Rao <naveen@kernel.org> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-12-05 15:11:26 +00:00
static struct xarray *arrays[] = { &array };
KUNIT_ARRAY_PARAM(array, arrays, NULL);
static struct xarray *xa0s[] = { &xa0 };
KUNIT_ARRAY_PARAM(xa0, xa0s, NULL);
static struct workingset_testcase workingset_testcases[] = {
{ &array, 0 },
{ &array, 64 },
{ &array, 4096 },
};
KUNIT_ARRAY_PARAM(workingset, workingset_testcases, NULL);
static struct kunit_case xarray_cases[] = {
KUNIT_CASE_PARAM(check_xa_err, array_gen_params),
KUNIT_CASE_PARAM(check_xas_retry, array_gen_params),
KUNIT_CASE_PARAM(check_xa_load, array_gen_params),
KUNIT_CASE_PARAM(check_xa_mark, array_gen_params),
KUNIT_CASE_PARAM(check_xa_shrink, array_gen_params),
KUNIT_CASE_PARAM(check_xas_erase, array_gen_params),
KUNIT_CASE_PARAM(check_insert, array_gen_params),
KUNIT_CASE_PARAM(check_cmpxchg, array_gen_params),
KUNIT_CASE_PARAM(check_cmpxchg_order, array_gen_params),
KUNIT_CASE_PARAM(check_reserve, array_gen_params),
KUNIT_CASE_PARAM(check_reserve, xa0_gen_params),
KUNIT_CASE_PARAM(check_multi_store, array_gen_params),
KUNIT_CASE_PARAM(check_multi_store_advanced, array_gen_params),
KUNIT_CASE_PARAM(check_get_order, array_gen_params),
KUNIT_CASE_PARAM(check_xas_get_order, array_gen_params),
KUNIT_CASE_PARAM(check_xas_conflict_get_order, array_gen_params),
KUNIT_CASE(check_xa_alloc),
KUNIT_CASE_PARAM(check_find, array_gen_params),
KUNIT_CASE_PARAM(check_find_entry, array_gen_params),
KUNIT_CASE_PARAM(check_pause, array_gen_params),
KUNIT_CASE_PARAM(check_account, array_gen_params),
KUNIT_CASE_PARAM(check_destroy, array_gen_params),
KUNIT_CASE_PARAM(check_move, array_gen_params),
KUNIT_CASE_PARAM(check_create_range, array_gen_params),
KUNIT_CASE_PARAM(check_store_range, array_gen_params),
KUNIT_CASE_PARAM(check_store_iter, array_gen_params),
KUNIT_CASE_PARAM(check_align, xa0_gen_params),
KUNIT_CASE_PARAM(check_split, array_gen_params),
KUNIT_CASE_PARAM(check_workingset, workingset_gen_params),
{},
};
static struct kunit_suite xarray_suite = {
.name = "xarray",
.test_cases = xarray_cases,
};
kunit_test_suite(xarray_suite);
MODULE_AUTHOR("Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>");
MODULE_DESCRIPTION("XArray API test module");
MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");