Kernel/linux-next
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git synced 2025-01-19 23:02:31 +00:00
Code Issues Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity
linux-next/arch/loongarch/lib/copy_user.S

275 lines
5.5 KiB
ArmAsm
Raw Normal View History

LoongArch: Add some library functions Add some library functions for LoongArch, including: delay, memset, memcpy, memmove, copy_user, strncpy_user, strnlen_user and tlb dump functions. Reviewed-by: WANG Xuerui <git@xen0n.name> Reviewed-by: Jiaxun Yang <jiaxun.yang@flygoat.com> Signed-off-by: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@loongson.cn>
2022-05-31 18:04:11 +08:00
/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
/*
* Copyright (C) 2020-2022 Loongson Technology Corporation Limited
*/
LoongArch: Use alternative to optimize libraries Use the alternative to optimize common libraries according whether CPU has UAL (hardware unaligned access support) feature, including memset(), memcopy(), memmove(), copy_user() and clear_user(). We have tested UnixBench on a Loongson-3A5000 quad-core machine (1.6GHz): 1, One copy, before patch: System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 9566582.0 819.8 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 2805.3 510.1 Execl Throughput 43.0 2120.0 493.0 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 209833.0 529.9 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 89400.0 540.2 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 320036.0 551.8 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 340624.0 273.8 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 109939.1 274.8 Process Creation 126.0 4728.7 375.3 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 2223.1 524.3 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 883.1 1471.9 System Call Overhead 15000.0 518639.1 345.8 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 500.2 2, One copy, after patch: System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 9567674.7 819.9 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 2805.5 510.1 Execl Throughput 43.0 2392.7 556.4 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 417804.0 1055.1 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 112909.5 682.2 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1255207.4 2164.2 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 555712.0 446.7 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 99964.5 249.9 Process Creation 126.0 5192.5 412.1 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 2302.4 543.0 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 919.6 1532.6 System Call Overhead 15000.0 511159.3 340.8 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 640.1 3, Four copies, before patch: System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 38268610.5 3279.2 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 11222.2 2040.4 Execl Throughput 43.0 7892.0 1835.3 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 235149.6 593.8 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 74959.6 452.9 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 545048.5 939.7 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 1337359.0 1075.0 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 473663.9 1184.2 Process Creation 126.0 17491.2 1388.2 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 6865.7 1619.3 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1015.9 1693.1 System Call Overhead 15000.0 1899535.2 1266.4 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 1278.3 4, Four copies, after patch: System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 38272815.5 3279.6 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 11222.8 2040.5 Execl Throughput 43.0 8839.2 2055.6 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 313912.9 792.7 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 80976.1 489.3 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1176594.3 2028.6 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 2100941.9 1688.9 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 476696.4 1191.7 Process Creation 126.0 18394.7 1459.9 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 7172.2 1691.6 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1058.3 1763.9 System Call Overhead 15000.0 1874714.7 1249.8 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 1488.8 Signed-off-by: Jun Yi <yijun@loongson.cn> Signed-off-by: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@loongson.cn>
2022-12-10 22:39:59 +08:00
#include <asm/alternative-asm.h>
LoongArch: Add some library functions Add some library functions for LoongArch, including: delay, memset, memcpy, memmove, copy_user, strncpy_user, strnlen_user and tlb dump functions. Reviewed-by: WANG Xuerui <git@xen0n.name> Reviewed-by: Jiaxun Yang <jiaxun.yang@flygoat.com> Signed-off-by: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@loongson.cn>
2022-05-31 18:04:11 +08:00
#include <asm/asm.h>
#include <asm/asmmacro.h>
LoongArch: Consolidate __ex_table construction Consolidate all the __ex_table constuction code with a _ASM_EXTABLE or _asm_extable helper. There should be no functional change as a result of this patch. Signed-off-by: Youling Tang <tangyouling@loongson.cn> Signed-off-by: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@loongson.cn>
2022-12-10 22:39:48 +08:00
#include <asm/asm-extable.h>
LoongArch: Use alternative to optimize libraries Use the alternative to optimize common libraries according whether CPU has UAL (hardware unaligned access support) feature, including memset(), memcopy(), memmove(), copy_user() and clear_user(). We have tested UnixBench on a Loongson-3A5000 quad-core machine (1.6GHz): 1, One copy, before patch: System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 9566582.0 819.8 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 2805.3 510.1 Execl Throughput 43.0 2120.0 493.0 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 209833.0 529.9 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 89400.0 540.2 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 320036.0 551.8 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 340624.0 273.8 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 109939.1 274.8 Process Creation 126.0 4728.7 375.3 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 2223.1 524.3 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 883.1 1471.9 System Call Overhead 15000.0 518639.1 345.8 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 500.2 2, One copy, after patch: System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 9567674.7 819.9 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 2805.5 510.1 Execl Throughput 43.0 2392.7 556.4 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 417804.0 1055.1 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 112909.5 682.2 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1255207.4 2164.2 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 555712.0 446.7 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 99964.5 249.9 Process Creation 126.0 5192.5 412.1 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 2302.4 543.0 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 919.6 1532.6 System Call Overhead 15000.0 511159.3 340.8 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 640.1 3, Four copies, before patch: System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 38268610.5 3279.2 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 11222.2 2040.4 Execl Throughput 43.0 7892.0 1835.3 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 235149.6 593.8 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 74959.6 452.9 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 545048.5 939.7 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 1337359.0 1075.0 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 473663.9 1184.2 Process Creation 126.0 17491.2 1388.2 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 6865.7 1619.3 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1015.9 1693.1 System Call Overhead 15000.0 1899535.2 1266.4 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 1278.3 4, Four copies, after patch: System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 38272815.5 3279.6 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 11222.8 2040.5 Execl Throughput 43.0 8839.2 2055.6 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 313912.9 792.7 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 80976.1 489.3 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1176594.3 2028.6 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 2100941.9 1688.9 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 476696.4 1191.7 Process Creation 126.0 18394.7 1459.9 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 7172.2 1691.6 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1058.3 1763.9 System Call Overhead 15000.0 1874714.7 1249.8 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 1488.8 Signed-off-by: Jun Yi <yijun@loongson.cn> Signed-off-by: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@loongson.cn>
2022-12-10 22:39:59 +08:00
#include <asm/cpu.h>
LoongArch: Add some library functions Add some library functions for LoongArch, including: delay, memset, memcpy, memmove, copy_user, strncpy_user, strnlen_user and tlb dump functions. Reviewed-by: WANG Xuerui <git@xen0n.name> Reviewed-by: Jiaxun Yang <jiaxun.yang@flygoat.com> Signed-off-by: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@loongson.cn>
2022-05-31 18:04:11 +08:00
#include <asm/export.h>
#include <asm/regdef.h>
LoongArch: Use alternative to optimize libraries Use the alternative to optimize common libraries according whether CPU has UAL (hardware unaligned access support) feature, including memset(), memcopy(), memmove(), copy_user() and clear_user(). We have tested UnixBench on a Loongson-3A5000 quad-core machine (1.6GHz): 1, One copy, before patch: System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 9566582.0 819.8 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 2805.3 510.1 Execl Throughput 43.0 2120.0 493.0 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 209833.0 529.9 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 89400.0 540.2 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 320036.0 551.8 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 340624.0 273.8 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 109939.1 274.8 Process Creation 126.0 4728.7 375.3 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 2223.1 524.3 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 883.1 1471.9 System Call Overhead 15000.0 518639.1 345.8 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 500.2 2, One copy, after patch: System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 9567674.7 819.9 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 2805.5 510.1 Execl Throughput 43.0 2392.7 556.4 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 417804.0 1055.1 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 112909.5 682.2 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1255207.4 2164.2 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 555712.0 446.7 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 99964.5 249.9 Process Creation 126.0 5192.5 412.1 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 2302.4 543.0 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 919.6 1532.6 System Call Overhead 15000.0 511159.3 340.8 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 640.1 3, Four copies, before patch: System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 38268610.5 3279.2 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 11222.2 2040.4 Execl Throughput 43.0 7892.0 1835.3 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 235149.6 593.8 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 74959.6 452.9 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 545048.5 939.7 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 1337359.0 1075.0 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 473663.9 1184.2 Process Creation 126.0 17491.2 1388.2 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 6865.7 1619.3 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1015.9 1693.1 System Call Overhead 15000.0 1899535.2 1266.4 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 1278.3 4, Four copies, after patch: System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 38272815.5 3279.6 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 11222.8 2040.5 Execl Throughput 43.0 8839.2 2055.6 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 313912.9 792.7 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 80976.1 489.3 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1176594.3 2028.6 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 2100941.9 1688.9 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 476696.4 1191.7 Process Creation 126.0 18394.7 1459.9 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 7172.2 1691.6 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1058.3 1763.9 System Call Overhead 15000.0 1874714.7 1249.8 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 1488.8 Signed-off-by: Jun Yi <yijun@loongson.cn> Signed-off-by: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@loongson.cn>
2022-12-10 22:39:59 +08:00
.irp to, 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
LoongArch: Remove the .fixup section usage Use the `.L_xxx` label to improve fixup code and then remove the .fixup section usage. Signed-off-by: Youling Tang <tangyouling@loongson.cn> Signed-off-by: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@loongson.cn>
2022-12-10 22:39:59 +08:00
.L_fixup_handle_\to\():
LoongArch: Optimize memory ops (memset/memcpy/memmove) To optimize memset()/memcpy()/memmove() and so on, we use a jump table to dispatch cases for short data lengths; and for long data lengths, we split the destination into head part (first 8 bytes), tail part (last 8 bytes) and middle part. The head part and tail part may be at unaligned addresses, while the middle part is always aligned (the middle part is allowed to overlap the head/tail part). In this way, the first and last 8 bytes may be unaligned accesses, but we can make sure the data in the middle is processed at an aligned destination address. We have tested micro-bench[1] on a Loongson-3C5000 16-core machine (2.2GHz): 1. memset | length | src offset | dst offset | speed before | speed after | % | |--------|------------|------------|--------------|-------------|---------| | 8 | 0 | 0 | 696.191 | 1518.785 | 118.16% | | 8 | 0 | 1 | 696.325 | 1518.937 | 118.14% | | 50 | 0 | 0 | 969.976 | 8053.902 | 730.32% | | 50 | 0 | 1 | 970.034 | 8058.475 | 730.74% | | 300 | 0 | 0 | 5876.612 | 16544.703 | 181.53% | | 300 | 0 | 1 | 5030.849 | 16549.011 | 228.95% | | 1200 | 0 | 0 | 11797.077 | 16752.137 | 42.00% | | 1200 | 0 | 1 | 5687.141 | 16645.233 | 192.68% | | 4000 | 0 | 0 | 15723.27 | 16761.557 | 6.60% | | 4000 | 0 | 1 | 5906.114 | 16732.316 | 183.30% | | 8000 | 0 | 0 | 16751.403 | 16770.002 | 0.11% | | 8000 | 0 | 1 | 5995.449 | 16754.07 | 179.45% | 2. memcpy | length | src offset | dst offset | speed before | speed after | % | |--------|------------|------------|--------------|-------------|---------| | 8 | 0 | 0 | 696.2 | 1670.605 | 139.96% | | 8 | 0 | 1 | 696.325 | 1671.138 | 139.99% | | 50 | 0 | 0 | 969.974 | 8724.999 | 799.51% | | 50 | 0 | 1 | 970.032 | 8730.138 | 799.98% | | 300 | 0 | 0 | 5564.662 | 16272.652 | 192.43% | | 300 | 0 | 1 | 4670.436 | 14972.842 | 220.59% | | 1200 | 0 | 0 | 10740.23 | 16751.728 | 55.97% | | 1200 | 0 | 1 | 5027.741 | 14874.564 | 195.85% | | 4000 | 0 | 0 | 15122.367 | 16737.642 | 10.68% | | 4000 | 0 | 1 | 5536.918 | 14890.397 | 168.93% | | 8000 | 0 | 0 | 16505.453 | 16553.543 | 0.29% | | 8000 | 0 | 1 | 5821.619 | 14841.804 | 154.94% | 3. memmove | length | src offset | dst offset | speed before | speed after | % | |--------|------------|------------|--------------|-------------|---------| | 8 | 0 | 0 | 982.693 | 1670.568 | 70.00% | | 8 | 0 | 1 | 983.023 | 1671.174 | 70.00% | | 50 | 0 | 0 | 1230.87 | 8727.625 | 609.06% | | 50 | 0 | 1 | 1232.515 | 8730.138 | 608.32% | | 300 | 0 | 0 | 6490.375 | 16296.993 | 151.09% | | 300 | 0 | 1 | 4282.687 | 14972.842 | 249.61% | | 1200 | 0 | 0 | 11742.755 | 16752.546 | 42.66% | | 1200 | 0 | 1 | 5039.338 | 14872.951 | 195.14% | | 4000 | 0 | 0 | 15467.786 | 16737.09 | 8.21% | | 4000 | 0 | 1 | 5009.905 | 14890.542 | 197.22% | | 8000 | 0 | 0 | 16489.664 | 16553.273 | 0.39% | | 8000 | 0 | 1 | 5823.786 | 14858.646 | 155.14% | * speed: MB/s * length: byte [1] https://github.com/heiher/mem-bench Signed-off-by: WANG Rui <wangrui@loongson.cn> Signed-off-by: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@loongson.cn>
2023-05-01 17:19:43 +08:00
sub.d a0, a2, a0
addi.d a0, a0, (\to) * (-8)
jr ra
.endr
.irp to, 0, 2, 4
.L_fixup_handle_s\to\():
addi.d a0, a2, -\to
LoongArch: Add some library functions Add some library functions for LoongArch, including: delay, memset, memcpy, memmove, copy_user, strncpy_user, strnlen_user and tlb dump functions. Reviewed-by: WANG Xuerui <git@xen0n.name> Reviewed-by: Jiaxun Yang <jiaxun.yang@flygoat.com> Signed-off-by: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@loongson.cn>
2022-05-31 18:04:11 +08:00
jr ra
LoongArch: Remove the .fixup section usage Use the `.L_xxx` label to improve fixup code and then remove the .fixup section usage. Signed-off-by: Youling Tang <tangyouling@loongson.cn> Signed-off-by: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@loongson.cn>
2022-12-10 22:39:59 +08:00
.endr
LoongArch: Add some library functions Add some library functions for LoongArch, including: delay, memset, memcpy, memmove, copy_user, strncpy_user, strnlen_user and tlb dump functions. Reviewed-by: WANG Xuerui <git@xen0n.name> Reviewed-by: Jiaxun Yang <jiaxun.yang@flygoat.com> Signed-off-by: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@loongson.cn>
2022-05-31 18:04:11 +08:00
LoongArch: Use alternative to optimize libraries Use the alternative to optimize common libraries according whether CPU has UAL (hardware unaligned access support) feature, including memset(), memcopy(), memmove(), copy_user() and clear_user(). We have tested UnixBench on a Loongson-3A5000 quad-core machine (1.6GHz): 1, One copy, before patch: System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 9566582.0 819.8 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 2805.3 510.1 Execl Throughput 43.0 2120.0 493.0 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 209833.0 529.9 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 89400.0 540.2 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 320036.0 551.8 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 340624.0 273.8 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 109939.1 274.8 Process Creation 126.0 4728.7 375.3 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 2223.1 524.3 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 883.1 1471.9 System Call Overhead 15000.0 518639.1 345.8 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 500.2 2, One copy, after patch: System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 9567674.7 819.9 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 2805.5 510.1 Execl Throughput 43.0 2392.7 556.4 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 417804.0 1055.1 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 112909.5 682.2 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1255207.4 2164.2 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 555712.0 446.7 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 99964.5 249.9 Process Creation 126.0 5192.5 412.1 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 2302.4 543.0 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 919.6 1532.6 System Call Overhead 15000.0 511159.3 340.8 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 640.1 3, Four copies, before patch: System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 38268610.5 3279.2 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 11222.2 2040.4 Execl Throughput 43.0 7892.0 1835.3 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 235149.6 593.8 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 74959.6 452.9 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 545048.5 939.7 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 1337359.0 1075.0 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 473663.9 1184.2 Process Creation 126.0 17491.2 1388.2 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 6865.7 1619.3 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1015.9 1693.1 System Call Overhead 15000.0 1899535.2 1266.4 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 1278.3 4, Four copies, after patch: System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 38272815.5 3279.6 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 11222.8 2040.5 Execl Throughput 43.0 8839.2 2055.6 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 313912.9 792.7 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 80976.1 489.3 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1176594.3 2028.6 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 2100941.9 1688.9 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 476696.4 1191.7 Process Creation 126.0 18394.7 1459.9 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 7172.2 1691.6 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1058.3 1763.9 System Call Overhead 15000.0 1874714.7 1249.8 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 1488.8 Signed-off-by: Jun Yi <yijun@loongson.cn> Signed-off-by: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@loongson.cn>
2022-12-10 22:39:59 +08:00
SYM_FUNC_START(__copy_user)
/*
* Some CPUs support hardware unaligned access
*/
ALTERNATIVE "b __copy_user_generic", \
"b __copy_user_fast", CPU_FEATURE_UAL
SYM_FUNC_END(__copy_user)
EXPORT_SYMBOL(__copy_user)
LoongArch: Add some library functions Add some library functions for LoongArch, including: delay, memset, memcpy, memmove, copy_user, strncpy_user, strnlen_user and tlb dump functions. Reviewed-by: WANG Xuerui <git@xen0n.name> Reviewed-by: Jiaxun Yang <jiaxun.yang@flygoat.com> Signed-off-by: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@loongson.cn>
2022-05-31 18:04:11 +08:00
/*
LoongArch: Use alternative to optimize libraries Use the alternative to optimize common libraries according whether CPU has UAL (hardware unaligned access support) feature, including memset(), memcopy(), memmove(), copy_user() and clear_user(). We have tested UnixBench on a Loongson-3A5000 quad-core machine (1.6GHz): 1, One copy, before patch: System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 9566582.0 819.8 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 2805.3 510.1 Execl Throughput 43.0 2120.0 493.0 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 209833.0 529.9 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 89400.0 540.2 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 320036.0 551.8 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 340624.0 273.8 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 109939.1 274.8 Process Creation 126.0 4728.7 375.3 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 2223.1 524.3 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 883.1 1471.9 System Call Overhead 15000.0 518639.1 345.8 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 500.2 2, One copy, after patch: System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 9567674.7 819.9 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 2805.5 510.1 Execl Throughput 43.0 2392.7 556.4 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 417804.0 1055.1 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 112909.5 682.2 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1255207.4 2164.2 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 555712.0 446.7 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 99964.5 249.9 Process Creation 126.0 5192.5 412.1 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 2302.4 543.0 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 919.6 1532.6 System Call Overhead 15000.0 511159.3 340.8 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 640.1 3, Four copies, before patch: System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 38268610.5 3279.2 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 11222.2 2040.4 Execl Throughput 43.0 7892.0 1835.3 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 235149.6 593.8 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 74959.6 452.9 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 545048.5 939.7 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 1337359.0 1075.0 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 473663.9 1184.2 Process Creation 126.0 17491.2 1388.2 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 6865.7 1619.3 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1015.9 1693.1 System Call Overhead 15000.0 1899535.2 1266.4 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 1278.3 4, Four copies, after patch: System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 38272815.5 3279.6 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 11222.8 2040.5 Execl Throughput 43.0 8839.2 2055.6 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 313912.9 792.7 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 80976.1 489.3 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1176594.3 2028.6 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 2100941.9 1688.9 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 476696.4 1191.7 Process Creation 126.0 18394.7 1459.9 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 7172.2 1691.6 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1058.3 1763.9 System Call Overhead 15000.0 1874714.7 1249.8 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 1488.8 Signed-off-by: Jun Yi <yijun@loongson.cn> Signed-off-by: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@loongson.cn>
2022-12-10 22:39:59 +08:00
* unsigned long __copy_user_generic(void *to, const void *from, size_t n)
LoongArch: Add some library functions Add some library functions for LoongArch, including: delay, memset, memcpy, memmove, copy_user, strncpy_user, strnlen_user and tlb dump functions. Reviewed-by: WANG Xuerui <git@xen0n.name> Reviewed-by: Jiaxun Yang <jiaxun.yang@flygoat.com> Signed-off-by: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@loongson.cn>
2022-05-31 18:04:11 +08:00
*
* a0: to
* a1: from
* a2: n
*/
LoongArch: Use alternative to optimize libraries Use the alternative to optimize common libraries according whether CPU has UAL (hardware unaligned access support) feature, including memset(), memcopy(), memmove(), copy_user() and clear_user(). We have tested UnixBench on a Loongson-3A5000 quad-core machine (1.6GHz): 1, One copy, before patch: System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 9566582.0 819.8 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 2805.3 510.1 Execl Throughput 43.0 2120.0 493.0 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 209833.0 529.9 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 89400.0 540.2 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 320036.0 551.8 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 340624.0 273.8 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 109939.1 274.8 Process Creation 126.0 4728.7 375.3 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 2223.1 524.3 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 883.1 1471.9 System Call Overhead 15000.0 518639.1 345.8 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 500.2 2, One copy, after patch: System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 9567674.7 819.9 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 2805.5 510.1 Execl Throughput 43.0 2392.7 556.4 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 417804.0 1055.1 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 112909.5 682.2 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1255207.4 2164.2 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 555712.0 446.7 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 99964.5 249.9 Process Creation 126.0 5192.5 412.1 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 2302.4 543.0 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 919.6 1532.6 System Call Overhead 15000.0 511159.3 340.8 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 640.1 3, Four copies, before patch: System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 38268610.5 3279.2 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 11222.2 2040.4 Execl Throughput 43.0 7892.0 1835.3 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 235149.6 593.8 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 74959.6 452.9 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 545048.5 939.7 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 1337359.0 1075.0 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 473663.9 1184.2 Process Creation 126.0 17491.2 1388.2 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 6865.7 1619.3 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1015.9 1693.1 System Call Overhead 15000.0 1899535.2 1266.4 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 1278.3 4, Four copies, after patch: System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 38272815.5 3279.6 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 11222.8 2040.5 Execl Throughput 43.0 8839.2 2055.6 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 313912.9 792.7 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 80976.1 489.3 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1176594.3 2028.6 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 2100941.9 1688.9 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 476696.4 1191.7 Process Creation 126.0 18394.7 1459.9 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 7172.2 1691.6 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1058.3 1763.9 System Call Overhead 15000.0 1874714.7 1249.8 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 1488.8 Signed-off-by: Jun Yi <yijun@loongson.cn> Signed-off-by: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@loongson.cn>
2022-12-10 22:39:59 +08:00
SYM_FUNC_START(__copy_user_generic)
LoongArch: Add some library functions Add some library functions for LoongArch, including: delay, memset, memcpy, memmove, copy_user, strncpy_user, strnlen_user and tlb dump functions. Reviewed-by: WANG Xuerui <git@xen0n.name> Reviewed-by: Jiaxun Yang <jiaxun.yang@flygoat.com> Signed-off-by: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@loongson.cn>
2022-05-31 18:04:11 +08:00
beqz a2, 3f
1: ld.b t0, a1, 0
2: st.b t0, a0, 0
addi.d a0, a0, 1
addi.d a1, a1, 1
addi.d a2, a2, -1
LoongArch: Simplify "BGT foo, zero" with BGTZ Support for the syntactic sugar is present in upstream binutils port from the beginning. Use it for shorter lines and better consistency. Generated code should be identical. Signed-off-by: WANG Xuerui <git@xen0n.name> Signed-off-by: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@loongson.cn>
2022-07-26 23:57:21 +08:00
bgtz a2, 1b
LoongArch: Add some library functions Add some library functions for LoongArch, including: delay, memset, memcpy, memmove, copy_user, strncpy_user, strnlen_user and tlb dump functions. Reviewed-by: WANG Xuerui <git@xen0n.name> Reviewed-by: Jiaxun Yang <jiaxun.yang@flygoat.com> Signed-off-by: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@loongson.cn>
2022-05-31 18:04:11 +08:00
3: move a0, a2
jr ra
LoongArch: Optimize memory ops (memset/memcpy/memmove) To optimize memset()/memcpy()/memmove() and so on, we use a jump table to dispatch cases for short data lengths; and for long data lengths, we split the destination into head part (first 8 bytes), tail part (last 8 bytes) and middle part. The head part and tail part may be at unaligned addresses, while the middle part is always aligned (the middle part is allowed to overlap the head/tail part). In this way, the first and last 8 bytes may be unaligned accesses, but we can make sure the data in the middle is processed at an aligned destination address. We have tested micro-bench[1] on a Loongson-3C5000 16-core machine (2.2GHz): 1. memset | length | src offset | dst offset | speed before | speed after | % | |--------|------------|------------|--------------|-------------|---------| | 8 | 0 | 0 | 696.191 | 1518.785 | 118.16% | | 8 | 0 | 1 | 696.325 | 1518.937 | 118.14% | | 50 | 0 | 0 | 969.976 | 8053.902 | 730.32% | | 50 | 0 | 1 | 970.034 | 8058.475 | 730.74% | | 300 | 0 | 0 | 5876.612 | 16544.703 | 181.53% | | 300 | 0 | 1 | 5030.849 | 16549.011 | 228.95% | | 1200 | 0 | 0 | 11797.077 | 16752.137 | 42.00% | | 1200 | 0 | 1 | 5687.141 | 16645.233 | 192.68% | | 4000 | 0 | 0 | 15723.27 | 16761.557 | 6.60% | | 4000 | 0 | 1 | 5906.114 | 16732.316 | 183.30% | | 8000 | 0 | 0 | 16751.403 | 16770.002 | 0.11% | | 8000 | 0 | 1 | 5995.449 | 16754.07 | 179.45% | 2. memcpy | length | src offset | dst offset | speed before | speed after | % | |--------|------------|------------|--------------|-------------|---------| | 8 | 0 | 0 | 696.2 | 1670.605 | 139.96% | | 8 | 0 | 1 | 696.325 | 1671.138 | 139.99% | | 50 | 0 | 0 | 969.974 | 8724.999 | 799.51% | | 50 | 0 | 1 | 970.032 | 8730.138 | 799.98% | | 300 | 0 | 0 | 5564.662 | 16272.652 | 192.43% | | 300 | 0 | 1 | 4670.436 | 14972.842 | 220.59% | | 1200 | 0 | 0 | 10740.23 | 16751.728 | 55.97% | | 1200 | 0 | 1 | 5027.741 | 14874.564 | 195.85% | | 4000 | 0 | 0 | 15122.367 | 16737.642 | 10.68% | | 4000 | 0 | 1 | 5536.918 | 14890.397 | 168.93% | | 8000 | 0 | 0 | 16505.453 | 16553.543 | 0.29% | | 8000 | 0 | 1 | 5821.619 | 14841.804 | 154.94% | 3. memmove | length | src offset | dst offset | speed before | speed after | % | |--------|------------|------------|--------------|-------------|---------| | 8 | 0 | 0 | 982.693 | 1670.568 | 70.00% | | 8 | 0 | 1 | 983.023 | 1671.174 | 70.00% | | 50 | 0 | 0 | 1230.87 | 8727.625 | 609.06% | | 50 | 0 | 1 | 1232.515 | 8730.138 | 608.32% | | 300 | 0 | 0 | 6490.375 | 16296.993 | 151.09% | | 300 | 0 | 1 | 4282.687 | 14972.842 | 249.61% | | 1200 | 0 | 0 | 11742.755 | 16752.546 | 42.66% | | 1200 | 0 | 1 | 5039.338 | 14872.951 | 195.14% | | 4000 | 0 | 0 | 15467.786 | 16737.09 | 8.21% | | 4000 | 0 | 1 | 5009.905 | 14890.542 | 197.22% | | 8000 | 0 | 0 | 16489.664 | 16553.273 | 0.39% | | 8000 | 0 | 1 | 5823.786 | 14858.646 | 155.14% | * speed: MB/s * length: byte [1] https://github.com/heiher/mem-bench Signed-off-by: WANG Rui <wangrui@loongson.cn> Signed-off-by: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@loongson.cn>
2023-05-01 17:19:43 +08:00
_asm_extable 1b, .L_fixup_handle_s0
_asm_extable 2b, .L_fixup_handle_s0
LoongArch: Use alternative to optimize libraries Use the alternative to optimize common libraries according whether CPU has UAL (hardware unaligned access support) feature, including memset(), memcopy(), memmove(), copy_user() and clear_user(). We have tested UnixBench on a Loongson-3A5000 quad-core machine (1.6GHz): 1, One copy, before patch: System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 9566582.0 819.8 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 2805.3 510.1 Execl Throughput 43.0 2120.0 493.0 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 209833.0 529.9 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 89400.0 540.2 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 320036.0 551.8 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 340624.0 273.8 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 109939.1 274.8 Process Creation 126.0 4728.7 375.3 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 2223.1 524.3 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 883.1 1471.9 System Call Overhead 15000.0 518639.1 345.8 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 500.2 2, One copy, after patch: System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 9567674.7 819.9 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 2805.5 510.1 Execl Throughput 43.0 2392.7 556.4 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 417804.0 1055.1 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 112909.5 682.2 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1255207.4 2164.2 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 555712.0 446.7 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 99964.5 249.9 Process Creation 126.0 5192.5 412.1 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 2302.4 543.0 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 919.6 1532.6 System Call Overhead 15000.0 511159.3 340.8 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 640.1 3, Four copies, before patch: System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 38268610.5 3279.2 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 11222.2 2040.4 Execl Throughput 43.0 7892.0 1835.3 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 235149.6 593.8 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 74959.6 452.9 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 545048.5 939.7 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 1337359.0 1075.0 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 473663.9 1184.2 Process Creation 126.0 17491.2 1388.2 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 6865.7 1619.3 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1015.9 1693.1 System Call Overhead 15000.0 1899535.2 1266.4 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 1278.3 4, Four copies, after patch: System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 38272815.5 3279.6 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 11222.8 2040.5 Execl Throughput 43.0 8839.2 2055.6 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 313912.9 792.7 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 80976.1 489.3 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1176594.3 2028.6 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 2100941.9 1688.9 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 476696.4 1191.7 Process Creation 126.0 18394.7 1459.9 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 7172.2 1691.6 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1058.3 1763.9 System Call Overhead 15000.0 1874714.7 1249.8 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 1488.8 Signed-off-by: Jun Yi <yijun@loongson.cn> Signed-off-by: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@loongson.cn>
2022-12-10 22:39:59 +08:00
SYM_FUNC_END(__copy_user_generic)
LoongArch: Add some library functions Add some library functions for LoongArch, including: delay, memset, memcpy, memmove, copy_user, strncpy_user, strnlen_user and tlb dump functions. Reviewed-by: WANG Xuerui <git@xen0n.name> Reviewed-by: Jiaxun Yang <jiaxun.yang@flygoat.com> Signed-off-by: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@loongson.cn>
2022-05-31 18:04:11 +08:00
LoongArch: Use alternative to optimize libraries Use the alternative to optimize common libraries according whether CPU has UAL (hardware unaligned access support) feature, including memset(), memcopy(), memmove(), copy_user() and clear_user(). We have tested UnixBench on a Loongson-3A5000 quad-core machine (1.6GHz): 1, One copy, before patch: System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 9566582.0 819.8 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 2805.3 510.1 Execl Throughput 43.0 2120.0 493.0 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 209833.0 529.9 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 89400.0 540.2 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 320036.0 551.8 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 340624.0 273.8 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 109939.1 274.8 Process Creation 126.0 4728.7 375.3 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 2223.1 524.3 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 883.1 1471.9 System Call Overhead 15000.0 518639.1 345.8 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 500.2 2, One copy, after patch: System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 9567674.7 819.9 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 2805.5 510.1 Execl Throughput 43.0 2392.7 556.4 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 417804.0 1055.1 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 112909.5 682.2 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1255207.4 2164.2 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 555712.0 446.7 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 99964.5 249.9 Process Creation 126.0 5192.5 412.1 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 2302.4 543.0 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 919.6 1532.6 System Call Overhead 15000.0 511159.3 340.8 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 640.1 3, Four copies, before patch: System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 38268610.5 3279.2 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 11222.2 2040.4 Execl Throughput 43.0 7892.0 1835.3 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 235149.6 593.8 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 74959.6 452.9 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 545048.5 939.7 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 1337359.0 1075.0 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 473663.9 1184.2 Process Creation 126.0 17491.2 1388.2 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 6865.7 1619.3 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1015.9 1693.1 System Call Overhead 15000.0 1899535.2 1266.4 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 1278.3 4, Four copies, after patch: System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 38272815.5 3279.6 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 11222.8 2040.5 Execl Throughput 43.0 8839.2 2055.6 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 313912.9 792.7 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 80976.1 489.3 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1176594.3 2028.6 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 2100941.9 1688.9 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 476696.4 1191.7 Process Creation 126.0 18394.7 1459.9 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 7172.2 1691.6 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1058.3 1763.9 System Call Overhead 15000.0 1874714.7 1249.8 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 1488.8 Signed-off-by: Jun Yi <yijun@loongson.cn> Signed-off-by: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@loongson.cn>
2022-12-10 22:39:59 +08:00
/*
* unsigned long __copy_user_fast(void *to, const void *from, unsigned long n)
*
* a0: to
* a1: from
* a2: n
*/
SYM_FUNC_START(__copy_user_fast)
LoongArch: Optimize memory ops (memset/memcpy/memmove) To optimize memset()/memcpy()/memmove() and so on, we use a jump table to dispatch cases for short data lengths; and for long data lengths, we split the destination into head part (first 8 bytes), tail part (last 8 bytes) and middle part. The head part and tail part may be at unaligned addresses, while the middle part is always aligned (the middle part is allowed to overlap the head/tail part). In this way, the first and last 8 bytes may be unaligned accesses, but we can make sure the data in the middle is processed at an aligned destination address. We have tested micro-bench[1] on a Loongson-3C5000 16-core machine (2.2GHz): 1. memset | length | src offset | dst offset | speed before | speed after | % | |--------|------------|------------|--------------|-------------|---------| | 8 | 0 | 0 | 696.191 | 1518.785 | 118.16% | | 8 | 0 | 1 | 696.325 | 1518.937 | 118.14% | | 50 | 0 | 0 | 969.976 | 8053.902 | 730.32% | | 50 | 0 | 1 | 970.034 | 8058.475 | 730.74% | | 300 | 0 | 0 | 5876.612 | 16544.703 | 181.53% | | 300 | 0 | 1 | 5030.849 | 16549.011 | 228.95% | | 1200 | 0 | 0 | 11797.077 | 16752.137 | 42.00% | | 1200 | 0 | 1 | 5687.141 | 16645.233 | 192.68% | | 4000 | 0 | 0 | 15723.27 | 16761.557 | 6.60% | | 4000 | 0 | 1 | 5906.114 | 16732.316 | 183.30% | | 8000 | 0 | 0 | 16751.403 | 16770.002 | 0.11% | | 8000 | 0 | 1 | 5995.449 | 16754.07 | 179.45% | 2. memcpy | length | src offset | dst offset | speed before | speed after | % | |--------|------------|------------|--------------|-------------|---------| | 8 | 0 | 0 | 696.2 | 1670.605 | 139.96% | | 8 | 0 | 1 | 696.325 | 1671.138 | 139.99% | | 50 | 0 | 0 | 969.974 | 8724.999 | 799.51% | | 50 | 0 | 1 | 970.032 | 8730.138 | 799.98% | | 300 | 0 | 0 | 5564.662 | 16272.652 | 192.43% | | 300 | 0 | 1 | 4670.436 | 14972.842 | 220.59% | | 1200 | 0 | 0 | 10740.23 | 16751.728 | 55.97% | | 1200 | 0 | 1 | 5027.741 | 14874.564 | 195.85% | | 4000 | 0 | 0 | 15122.367 | 16737.642 | 10.68% | | 4000 | 0 | 1 | 5536.918 | 14890.397 | 168.93% | | 8000 | 0 | 0 | 16505.453 | 16553.543 | 0.29% | | 8000 | 0 | 1 | 5821.619 | 14841.804 | 154.94% | 3. memmove | length | src offset | dst offset | speed before | speed after | % | |--------|------------|------------|--------------|-------------|---------| | 8 | 0 | 0 | 982.693 | 1670.568 | 70.00% | | 8 | 0 | 1 | 983.023 | 1671.174 | 70.00% | | 50 | 0 | 0 | 1230.87 | 8727.625 | 609.06% | | 50 | 0 | 1 | 1232.515 | 8730.138 | 608.32% | | 300 | 0 | 0 | 6490.375 | 16296.993 | 151.09% | | 300 | 0 | 1 | 4282.687 | 14972.842 | 249.61% | | 1200 | 0 | 0 | 11742.755 | 16752.546 | 42.66% | | 1200 | 0 | 1 | 5039.338 | 14872.951 | 195.14% | | 4000 | 0 | 0 | 15467.786 | 16737.09 | 8.21% | | 4000 | 0 | 1 | 5009.905 | 14890.542 | 197.22% | | 8000 | 0 | 0 | 16489.664 | 16553.273 | 0.39% | | 8000 | 0 | 1 | 5823.786 | 14858.646 | 155.14% | * speed: MB/s * length: byte [1] https://github.com/heiher/mem-bench Signed-off-by: WANG Rui <wangrui@loongson.cn> Signed-off-by: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@loongson.cn>
2023-05-01 17:19:43 +08:00
sltui t0, a2, 9
bnez t0, .Lsmall
LoongArch: Use alternative to optimize libraries Use the alternative to optimize common libraries according whether CPU has UAL (hardware unaligned access support) feature, including memset(), memcopy(), memmove(), copy_user() and clear_user(). We have tested UnixBench on a Loongson-3A5000 quad-core machine (1.6GHz): 1, One copy, before patch: System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 9566582.0 819.8 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 2805.3 510.1 Execl Throughput 43.0 2120.0 493.0 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 209833.0 529.9 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 89400.0 540.2 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 320036.0 551.8 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 340624.0 273.8 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 109939.1 274.8 Process Creation 126.0 4728.7 375.3 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 2223.1 524.3 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 883.1 1471.9 System Call Overhead 15000.0 518639.1 345.8 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 500.2 2, One copy, after patch: System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 9567674.7 819.9 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 2805.5 510.1 Execl Throughput 43.0 2392.7 556.4 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 417804.0 1055.1 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 112909.5 682.2 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1255207.4 2164.2 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 555712.0 446.7 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 99964.5 249.9 Process Creation 126.0 5192.5 412.1 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 2302.4 543.0 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 919.6 1532.6 System Call Overhead 15000.0 511159.3 340.8 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 640.1 3, Four copies, before patch: System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 38268610.5 3279.2 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 11222.2 2040.4 Execl Throughput 43.0 7892.0 1835.3 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 235149.6 593.8 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 74959.6 452.9 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 545048.5 939.7 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 1337359.0 1075.0 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 473663.9 1184.2 Process Creation 126.0 17491.2 1388.2 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 6865.7 1619.3 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1015.9 1693.1 System Call Overhead 15000.0 1899535.2 1266.4 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 1278.3 4, Four copies, after patch: System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 38272815.5 3279.6 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 11222.8 2040.5 Execl Throughput 43.0 8839.2 2055.6 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 313912.9 792.7 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 80976.1 489.3 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1176594.3 2028.6 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 2100941.9 1688.9 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 476696.4 1191.7 Process Creation 126.0 18394.7 1459.9 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 7172.2 1691.6 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1058.3 1763.9 System Call Overhead 15000.0 1874714.7 1249.8 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 1488.8 Signed-off-by: Jun Yi <yijun@loongson.cn> Signed-off-by: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@loongson.cn>
2022-12-10 22:39:59 +08:00
LoongArch: Optimize memory ops (memset/memcpy/memmove) To optimize memset()/memcpy()/memmove() and so on, we use a jump table to dispatch cases for short data lengths; and for long data lengths, we split the destination into head part (first 8 bytes), tail part (last 8 bytes) and middle part. The head part and tail part may be at unaligned addresses, while the middle part is always aligned (the middle part is allowed to overlap the head/tail part). In this way, the first and last 8 bytes may be unaligned accesses, but we can make sure the data in the middle is processed at an aligned destination address. We have tested micro-bench[1] on a Loongson-3C5000 16-core machine (2.2GHz): 1. memset | length | src offset | dst offset | speed before | speed after | % | |--------|------------|------------|--------------|-------------|---------| | 8 | 0 | 0 | 696.191 | 1518.785 | 118.16% | | 8 | 0 | 1 | 696.325 | 1518.937 | 118.14% | | 50 | 0 | 0 | 969.976 | 8053.902 | 730.32% | | 50 | 0 | 1 | 970.034 | 8058.475 | 730.74% | | 300 | 0 | 0 | 5876.612 | 16544.703 | 181.53% | | 300 | 0 | 1 | 5030.849 | 16549.011 | 228.95% | | 1200 | 0 | 0 | 11797.077 | 16752.137 | 42.00% | | 1200 | 0 | 1 | 5687.141 | 16645.233 | 192.68% | | 4000 | 0 | 0 | 15723.27 | 16761.557 | 6.60% | | 4000 | 0 | 1 | 5906.114 | 16732.316 | 183.30% | | 8000 | 0 | 0 | 16751.403 | 16770.002 | 0.11% | | 8000 | 0 | 1 | 5995.449 | 16754.07 | 179.45% | 2. memcpy | length | src offset | dst offset | speed before | speed after | % | |--------|------------|------------|--------------|-------------|---------| | 8 | 0 | 0 | 696.2 | 1670.605 | 139.96% | | 8 | 0 | 1 | 696.325 | 1671.138 | 139.99% | | 50 | 0 | 0 | 969.974 | 8724.999 | 799.51% | | 50 | 0 | 1 | 970.032 | 8730.138 | 799.98% | | 300 | 0 | 0 | 5564.662 | 16272.652 | 192.43% | | 300 | 0 | 1 | 4670.436 | 14972.842 | 220.59% | | 1200 | 0 | 0 | 10740.23 | 16751.728 | 55.97% | | 1200 | 0 | 1 | 5027.741 | 14874.564 | 195.85% | | 4000 | 0 | 0 | 15122.367 | 16737.642 | 10.68% | | 4000 | 0 | 1 | 5536.918 | 14890.397 | 168.93% | | 8000 | 0 | 0 | 16505.453 | 16553.543 | 0.29% | | 8000 | 0 | 1 | 5821.619 | 14841.804 | 154.94% | 3. memmove | length | src offset | dst offset | speed before | speed after | % | |--------|------------|------------|--------------|-------------|---------| | 8 | 0 | 0 | 982.693 | 1670.568 | 70.00% | | 8 | 0 | 1 | 983.023 | 1671.174 | 70.00% | | 50 | 0 | 0 | 1230.87 | 8727.625 | 609.06% | | 50 | 0 | 1 | 1232.515 | 8730.138 | 608.32% | | 300 | 0 | 0 | 6490.375 | 16296.993 | 151.09% | | 300 | 0 | 1 | 4282.687 | 14972.842 | 249.61% | | 1200 | 0 | 0 | 11742.755 | 16752.546 | 42.66% | | 1200 | 0 | 1 | 5039.338 | 14872.951 | 195.14% | | 4000 | 0 | 0 | 15467.786 | 16737.09 | 8.21% | | 4000 | 0 | 1 | 5009.905 | 14890.542 | 197.22% | | 8000 | 0 | 0 | 16489.664 | 16553.273 | 0.39% | | 8000 | 0 | 1 | 5823.786 | 14858.646 | 155.14% | * speed: MB/s * length: byte [1] https://github.com/heiher/mem-bench Signed-off-by: WANG Rui <wangrui@loongson.cn> Signed-off-by: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@loongson.cn>
2023-05-01 17:19:43 +08:00
add.d a3, a1, a2
add.d a2, a0, a2
0: ld.d t0, a1, 0
1: st.d t0, a0, 0
LoongArch: Use alternative to optimize libraries Use the alternative to optimize common libraries according whether CPU has UAL (hardware unaligned access support) feature, including memset(), memcopy(), memmove(), copy_user() and clear_user(). We have tested UnixBench on a Loongson-3A5000 quad-core machine (1.6GHz): 1, One copy, before patch: System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 9566582.0 819.8 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 2805.3 510.1 Execl Throughput 43.0 2120.0 493.0 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 209833.0 529.9 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 89400.0 540.2 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 320036.0 551.8 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 340624.0 273.8 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 109939.1 274.8 Process Creation 126.0 4728.7 375.3 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 2223.1 524.3 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 883.1 1471.9 System Call Overhead 15000.0 518639.1 345.8 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 500.2 2, One copy, after patch: System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 9567674.7 819.9 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 2805.5 510.1 Execl Throughput 43.0 2392.7 556.4 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 417804.0 1055.1 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 112909.5 682.2 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1255207.4 2164.2 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 555712.0 446.7 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 99964.5 249.9 Process Creation 126.0 5192.5 412.1 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 2302.4 543.0 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 919.6 1532.6 System Call Overhead 15000.0 511159.3 340.8 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 640.1 3, Four copies, before patch: System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 38268610.5 3279.2 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 11222.2 2040.4 Execl Throughput 43.0 7892.0 1835.3 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 235149.6 593.8 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 74959.6 452.9 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 545048.5 939.7 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 1337359.0 1075.0 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 473663.9 1184.2 Process Creation 126.0 17491.2 1388.2 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 6865.7 1619.3 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1015.9 1693.1 System Call Overhead 15000.0 1899535.2 1266.4 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 1278.3 4, Four copies, after patch: System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 38272815.5 3279.6 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 11222.8 2040.5 Execl Throughput 43.0 8839.2 2055.6 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 313912.9 792.7 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 80976.1 489.3 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1176594.3 2028.6 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 2100941.9 1688.9 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 476696.4 1191.7 Process Creation 126.0 18394.7 1459.9 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 7172.2 1691.6 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1058.3 1763.9 System Call Overhead 15000.0 1874714.7 1249.8 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 1488.8 Signed-off-by: Jun Yi <yijun@loongson.cn> Signed-off-by: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@loongson.cn>
2022-12-10 22:39:59 +08:00
LoongArch: Optimize memory ops (memset/memcpy/memmove) To optimize memset()/memcpy()/memmove() and so on, we use a jump table to dispatch cases for short data lengths; and for long data lengths, we split the destination into head part (first 8 bytes), tail part (last 8 bytes) and middle part. The head part and tail part may be at unaligned addresses, while the middle part is always aligned (the middle part is allowed to overlap the head/tail part). In this way, the first and last 8 bytes may be unaligned accesses, but we can make sure the data in the middle is processed at an aligned destination address. We have tested micro-bench[1] on a Loongson-3C5000 16-core machine (2.2GHz): 1. memset | length | src offset | dst offset | speed before | speed after | % | |--------|------------|------------|--------------|-------------|---------| | 8 | 0 | 0 | 696.191 | 1518.785 | 118.16% | | 8 | 0 | 1 | 696.325 | 1518.937 | 118.14% | | 50 | 0 | 0 | 969.976 | 8053.902 | 730.32% | | 50 | 0 | 1 | 970.034 | 8058.475 | 730.74% | | 300 | 0 | 0 | 5876.612 | 16544.703 | 181.53% | | 300 | 0 | 1 | 5030.849 | 16549.011 | 228.95% | | 1200 | 0 | 0 | 11797.077 | 16752.137 | 42.00% | | 1200 | 0 | 1 | 5687.141 | 16645.233 | 192.68% | | 4000 | 0 | 0 | 15723.27 | 16761.557 | 6.60% | | 4000 | 0 | 1 | 5906.114 | 16732.316 | 183.30% | | 8000 | 0 | 0 | 16751.403 | 16770.002 | 0.11% | | 8000 | 0 | 1 | 5995.449 | 16754.07 | 179.45% | 2. memcpy | length | src offset | dst offset | speed before | speed after | % | |--------|------------|------------|--------------|-------------|---------| | 8 | 0 | 0 | 696.2 | 1670.605 | 139.96% | | 8 | 0 | 1 | 696.325 | 1671.138 | 139.99% | | 50 | 0 | 0 | 969.974 | 8724.999 | 799.51% | | 50 | 0 | 1 | 970.032 | 8730.138 | 799.98% | | 300 | 0 | 0 | 5564.662 | 16272.652 | 192.43% | | 300 | 0 | 1 | 4670.436 | 14972.842 | 220.59% | | 1200 | 0 | 0 | 10740.23 | 16751.728 | 55.97% | | 1200 | 0 | 1 | 5027.741 | 14874.564 | 195.85% | | 4000 | 0 | 0 | 15122.367 | 16737.642 | 10.68% | | 4000 | 0 | 1 | 5536.918 | 14890.397 | 168.93% | | 8000 | 0 | 0 | 16505.453 | 16553.543 | 0.29% | | 8000 | 0 | 1 | 5821.619 | 14841.804 | 154.94% | 3. memmove | length | src offset | dst offset | speed before | speed after | % | |--------|------------|------------|--------------|-------------|---------| | 8 | 0 | 0 | 982.693 | 1670.568 | 70.00% | | 8 | 0 | 1 | 983.023 | 1671.174 | 70.00% | | 50 | 0 | 0 | 1230.87 | 8727.625 | 609.06% | | 50 | 0 | 1 | 1232.515 | 8730.138 | 608.32% | | 300 | 0 | 0 | 6490.375 | 16296.993 | 151.09% | | 300 | 0 | 1 | 4282.687 | 14972.842 | 249.61% | | 1200 | 0 | 0 | 11742.755 | 16752.546 | 42.66% | | 1200 | 0 | 1 | 5039.338 | 14872.951 | 195.14% | | 4000 | 0 | 0 | 15467.786 | 16737.09 | 8.21% | | 4000 | 0 | 1 | 5009.905 | 14890.542 | 197.22% | | 8000 | 0 | 0 | 16489.664 | 16553.273 | 0.39% | | 8000 | 0 | 1 | 5823.786 | 14858.646 | 155.14% | * speed: MB/s * length: byte [1] https://github.com/heiher/mem-bench Signed-off-by: WANG Rui <wangrui@loongson.cn> Signed-off-by: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@loongson.cn>
2023-05-01 17:19:43 +08:00
/* align up destination address */
andi t1, a0, 7
sub.d t0, zero, t1
addi.d t0, t0, 8
add.d a1, a1, t0
add.d a0, a0, t0
LoongArch: Use alternative to optimize libraries Use the alternative to optimize common libraries according whether CPU has UAL (hardware unaligned access support) feature, including memset(), memcopy(), memmove(), copy_user() and clear_user(). We have tested UnixBench on a Loongson-3A5000 quad-core machine (1.6GHz): 1, One copy, before patch: System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 9566582.0 819.8 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 2805.3 510.1 Execl Throughput 43.0 2120.0 493.0 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 209833.0 529.9 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 89400.0 540.2 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 320036.0 551.8 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 340624.0 273.8 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 109939.1 274.8 Process Creation 126.0 4728.7 375.3 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 2223.1 524.3 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 883.1 1471.9 System Call Overhead 15000.0 518639.1 345.8 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 500.2 2, One copy, after patch: System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 9567674.7 819.9 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 2805.5 510.1 Execl Throughput 43.0 2392.7 556.4 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 417804.0 1055.1 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 112909.5 682.2 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1255207.4 2164.2 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 555712.0 446.7 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 99964.5 249.9 Process Creation 126.0 5192.5 412.1 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 2302.4 543.0 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 919.6 1532.6 System Call Overhead 15000.0 511159.3 340.8 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 640.1 3, Four copies, before patch: System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 38268610.5 3279.2 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 11222.2 2040.4 Execl Throughput 43.0 7892.0 1835.3 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 235149.6 593.8 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 74959.6 452.9 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 545048.5 939.7 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 1337359.0 1075.0 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 473663.9 1184.2 Process Creation 126.0 17491.2 1388.2 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 6865.7 1619.3 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1015.9 1693.1 System Call Overhead 15000.0 1899535.2 1266.4 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 1278.3 4, Four copies, after patch: System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 38272815.5 3279.6 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 11222.8 2040.5 Execl Throughput 43.0 8839.2 2055.6 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 313912.9 792.7 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 80976.1 489.3 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1176594.3 2028.6 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 2100941.9 1688.9 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 476696.4 1191.7 Process Creation 126.0 18394.7 1459.9 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 7172.2 1691.6 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1058.3 1763.9 System Call Overhead 15000.0 1874714.7 1249.8 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 1488.8 Signed-off-by: Jun Yi <yijun@loongson.cn> Signed-off-by: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@loongson.cn>
2022-12-10 22:39:59 +08:00
LoongArch: Optimize memory ops (memset/memcpy/memmove) To optimize memset()/memcpy()/memmove() and so on, we use a jump table to dispatch cases for short data lengths; and for long data lengths, we split the destination into head part (first 8 bytes), tail part (last 8 bytes) and middle part. The head part and tail part may be at unaligned addresses, while the middle part is always aligned (the middle part is allowed to overlap the head/tail part). In this way, the first and last 8 bytes may be unaligned accesses, but we can make sure the data in the middle is processed at an aligned destination address. We have tested micro-bench[1] on a Loongson-3C5000 16-core machine (2.2GHz): 1. memset | length | src offset | dst offset | speed before | speed after | % | |--------|------------|------------|--------------|-------------|---------| | 8 | 0 | 0 | 696.191 | 1518.785 | 118.16% | | 8 | 0 | 1 | 696.325 | 1518.937 | 118.14% | | 50 | 0 | 0 | 969.976 | 8053.902 | 730.32% | | 50 | 0 | 1 | 970.034 | 8058.475 | 730.74% | | 300 | 0 | 0 | 5876.612 | 16544.703 | 181.53% | | 300 | 0 | 1 | 5030.849 | 16549.011 | 228.95% | | 1200 | 0 | 0 | 11797.077 | 16752.137 | 42.00% | | 1200 | 0 | 1 | 5687.141 | 16645.233 | 192.68% | | 4000 | 0 | 0 | 15723.27 | 16761.557 | 6.60% | | 4000 | 0 | 1 | 5906.114 | 16732.316 | 183.30% | | 8000 | 0 | 0 | 16751.403 | 16770.002 | 0.11% | | 8000 | 0 | 1 | 5995.449 | 16754.07 | 179.45% | 2. memcpy | length | src offset | dst offset | speed before | speed after | % | |--------|------------|------------|--------------|-------------|---------| | 8 | 0 | 0 | 696.2 | 1670.605 | 139.96% | | 8 | 0 | 1 | 696.325 | 1671.138 | 139.99% | | 50 | 0 | 0 | 969.974 | 8724.999 | 799.51% | | 50 | 0 | 1 | 970.032 | 8730.138 | 799.98% | | 300 | 0 | 0 | 5564.662 | 16272.652 | 192.43% | | 300 | 0 | 1 | 4670.436 | 14972.842 | 220.59% | | 1200 | 0 | 0 | 10740.23 | 16751.728 | 55.97% | | 1200 | 0 | 1 | 5027.741 | 14874.564 | 195.85% | | 4000 | 0 | 0 | 15122.367 | 16737.642 | 10.68% | | 4000 | 0 | 1 | 5536.918 | 14890.397 | 168.93% | | 8000 | 0 | 0 | 16505.453 | 16553.543 | 0.29% | | 8000 | 0 | 1 | 5821.619 | 14841.804 | 154.94% | 3. memmove | length | src offset | dst offset | speed before | speed after | % | |--------|------------|------------|--------------|-------------|---------| | 8 | 0 | 0 | 982.693 | 1670.568 | 70.00% | | 8 | 0 | 1 | 983.023 | 1671.174 | 70.00% | | 50 | 0 | 0 | 1230.87 | 8727.625 | 609.06% | | 50 | 0 | 1 | 1232.515 | 8730.138 | 608.32% | | 300 | 0 | 0 | 6490.375 | 16296.993 | 151.09% | | 300 | 0 | 1 | 4282.687 | 14972.842 | 249.61% | | 1200 | 0 | 0 | 11742.755 | 16752.546 | 42.66% | | 1200 | 0 | 1 | 5039.338 | 14872.951 | 195.14% | | 4000 | 0 | 0 | 15467.786 | 16737.09 | 8.21% | | 4000 | 0 | 1 | 5009.905 | 14890.542 | 197.22% | | 8000 | 0 | 0 | 16489.664 | 16553.273 | 0.39% | | 8000 | 0 | 1 | 5823.786 | 14858.646 | 155.14% | * speed: MB/s * length: byte [1] https://github.com/heiher/mem-bench Signed-off-by: WANG Rui <wangrui@loongson.cn> Signed-off-by: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@loongson.cn>
2023-05-01 17:19:43 +08:00
addi.d a4, a3, -64
bgeu a1, a4, .Llt64
LoongArch: Use alternative to optimize libraries Use the alternative to optimize common libraries according whether CPU has UAL (hardware unaligned access support) feature, including memset(), memcopy(), memmove(), copy_user() and clear_user(). We have tested UnixBench on a Loongson-3A5000 quad-core machine (1.6GHz): 1, One copy, before patch: System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 9566582.0 819.8 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 2805.3 510.1 Execl Throughput 43.0 2120.0 493.0 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 209833.0 529.9 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 89400.0 540.2 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 320036.0 551.8 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 340624.0 273.8 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 109939.1 274.8 Process Creation 126.0 4728.7 375.3 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 2223.1 524.3 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 883.1 1471.9 System Call Overhead 15000.0 518639.1 345.8 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 500.2 2, One copy, after patch: System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 9567674.7 819.9 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 2805.5 510.1 Execl Throughput 43.0 2392.7 556.4 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 417804.0 1055.1 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 112909.5 682.2 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1255207.4 2164.2 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 555712.0 446.7 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 99964.5 249.9 Process Creation 126.0 5192.5 412.1 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 2302.4 543.0 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 919.6 1532.6 System Call Overhead 15000.0 511159.3 340.8 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 640.1 3, Four copies, before patch: System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 38268610.5 3279.2 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 11222.2 2040.4 Execl Throughput 43.0 7892.0 1835.3 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 235149.6 593.8 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 74959.6 452.9 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 545048.5 939.7 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 1337359.0 1075.0 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 473663.9 1184.2 Process Creation 126.0 17491.2 1388.2 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 6865.7 1619.3 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1015.9 1693.1 System Call Overhead 15000.0 1899535.2 1266.4 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 1278.3 4, Four copies, after patch: System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 38272815.5 3279.6 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 11222.8 2040.5 Execl Throughput 43.0 8839.2 2055.6 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 313912.9 792.7 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 80976.1 489.3 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1176594.3 2028.6 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 2100941.9 1688.9 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 476696.4 1191.7 Process Creation 126.0 18394.7 1459.9 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 7172.2 1691.6 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1058.3 1763.9 System Call Overhead 15000.0 1874714.7 1249.8 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 1488.8 Signed-off-by: Jun Yi <yijun@loongson.cn> Signed-off-by: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@loongson.cn>
2022-12-10 22:39:59 +08:00
LoongArch: Optimize memory ops (memset/memcpy/memmove) To optimize memset()/memcpy()/memmove() and so on, we use a jump table to dispatch cases for short data lengths; and for long data lengths, we split the destination into head part (first 8 bytes), tail part (last 8 bytes) and middle part. The head part and tail part may be at unaligned addresses, while the middle part is always aligned (the middle part is allowed to overlap the head/tail part). In this way, the first and last 8 bytes may be unaligned accesses, but we can make sure the data in the middle is processed at an aligned destination address. We have tested micro-bench[1] on a Loongson-3C5000 16-core machine (2.2GHz): 1. memset | length | src offset | dst offset | speed before | speed after | % | |--------|------------|------------|--------------|-------------|---------| | 8 | 0 | 0 | 696.191 | 1518.785 | 118.16% | | 8 | 0 | 1 | 696.325 | 1518.937 | 118.14% | | 50 | 0 | 0 | 969.976 | 8053.902 | 730.32% | | 50 | 0 | 1 | 970.034 | 8058.475 | 730.74% | | 300 | 0 | 0 | 5876.612 | 16544.703 | 181.53% | | 300 | 0 | 1 | 5030.849 | 16549.011 | 228.95% | | 1200 | 0 | 0 | 11797.077 | 16752.137 | 42.00% | | 1200 | 0 | 1 | 5687.141 | 16645.233 | 192.68% | | 4000 | 0 | 0 | 15723.27 | 16761.557 | 6.60% | | 4000 | 0 | 1 | 5906.114 | 16732.316 | 183.30% | | 8000 | 0 | 0 | 16751.403 | 16770.002 | 0.11% | | 8000 | 0 | 1 | 5995.449 | 16754.07 | 179.45% | 2. memcpy | length | src offset | dst offset | speed before | speed after | % | |--------|------------|------------|--------------|-------------|---------| | 8 | 0 | 0 | 696.2 | 1670.605 | 139.96% | | 8 | 0 | 1 | 696.325 | 1671.138 | 139.99% | | 50 | 0 | 0 | 969.974 | 8724.999 | 799.51% | | 50 | 0 | 1 | 970.032 | 8730.138 | 799.98% | | 300 | 0 | 0 | 5564.662 | 16272.652 | 192.43% | | 300 | 0 | 1 | 4670.436 | 14972.842 | 220.59% | | 1200 | 0 | 0 | 10740.23 | 16751.728 | 55.97% | | 1200 | 0 | 1 | 5027.741 | 14874.564 | 195.85% | | 4000 | 0 | 0 | 15122.367 | 16737.642 | 10.68% | | 4000 | 0 | 1 | 5536.918 | 14890.397 | 168.93% | | 8000 | 0 | 0 | 16505.453 | 16553.543 | 0.29% | | 8000 | 0 | 1 | 5821.619 | 14841.804 | 154.94% | 3. memmove | length | src offset | dst offset | speed before | speed after | % | |--------|------------|------------|--------------|-------------|---------| | 8 | 0 | 0 | 982.693 | 1670.568 | 70.00% | | 8 | 0 | 1 | 983.023 | 1671.174 | 70.00% | | 50 | 0 | 0 | 1230.87 | 8727.625 | 609.06% | | 50 | 0 | 1 | 1232.515 | 8730.138 | 608.32% | | 300 | 0 | 0 | 6490.375 | 16296.993 | 151.09% | | 300 | 0 | 1 | 4282.687 | 14972.842 | 249.61% | | 1200 | 0 | 0 | 11742.755 | 16752.546 | 42.66% | | 1200 | 0 | 1 | 5039.338 | 14872.951 | 195.14% | | 4000 | 0 | 0 | 15467.786 | 16737.09 | 8.21% | | 4000 | 0 | 1 | 5009.905 | 14890.542 | 197.22% | | 8000 | 0 | 0 | 16489.664 | 16553.273 | 0.39% | | 8000 | 0 | 1 | 5823.786 | 14858.646 | 155.14% | * speed: MB/s * length: byte [1] https://github.com/heiher/mem-bench Signed-off-by: WANG Rui <wangrui@loongson.cn> Signed-off-by: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@loongson.cn>
2023-05-01 17:19:43 +08:00
/* copy 64 bytes at a time */
.Lloop64:
2: ld.d t0, a1, 0
3: ld.d t1, a1, 8
4: ld.d t2, a1, 16
5: ld.d t3, a1, 24
6: ld.d t4, a1, 32
7: ld.d t5, a1, 40
8: ld.d t6, a1, 48
9: ld.d t7, a1, 56
addi.d a1, a1, 64
10: st.d t0, a0, 0
11: st.d t1, a0, 8
12: st.d t2, a0, 16
13: st.d t3, a0, 24
14: st.d t4, a0, 32
15: st.d t5, a0, 40
16: st.d t6, a0, 48
17: st.d t7, a0, 56
addi.d a0, a0, 64
bltu a1, a4, .Lloop64
LoongArch: Use alternative to optimize libraries Use the alternative to optimize common libraries according whether CPU has UAL (hardware unaligned access support) feature, including memset(), memcopy(), memmove(), copy_user() and clear_user(). We have tested UnixBench on a Loongson-3A5000 quad-core machine (1.6GHz): 1, One copy, before patch: System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 9566582.0 819.8 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 2805.3 510.1 Execl Throughput 43.0 2120.0 493.0 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 209833.0 529.9 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 89400.0 540.2 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 320036.0 551.8 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 340624.0 273.8 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 109939.1 274.8 Process Creation 126.0 4728.7 375.3 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 2223.1 524.3 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 883.1 1471.9 System Call Overhead 15000.0 518639.1 345.8 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 500.2 2, One copy, after patch: System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 9567674.7 819.9 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 2805.5 510.1 Execl Throughput 43.0 2392.7 556.4 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 417804.0 1055.1 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 112909.5 682.2 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1255207.4 2164.2 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 555712.0 446.7 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 99964.5 249.9 Process Creation 126.0 5192.5 412.1 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 2302.4 543.0 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 919.6 1532.6 System Call Overhead 15000.0 511159.3 340.8 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 640.1 3, Four copies, before patch: System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 38268610.5 3279.2 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 11222.2 2040.4 Execl Throughput 43.0 7892.0 1835.3 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 235149.6 593.8 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 74959.6 452.9 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 545048.5 939.7 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 1337359.0 1075.0 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 473663.9 1184.2 Process Creation 126.0 17491.2 1388.2 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 6865.7 1619.3 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1015.9 1693.1 System Call Overhead 15000.0 1899535.2 1266.4 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 1278.3 4, Four copies, after patch: System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 38272815.5 3279.6 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 11222.8 2040.5 Execl Throughput 43.0 8839.2 2055.6 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 313912.9 792.7 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 80976.1 489.3 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1176594.3 2028.6 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 2100941.9 1688.9 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 476696.4 1191.7 Process Creation 126.0 18394.7 1459.9 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 7172.2 1691.6 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1058.3 1763.9 System Call Overhead 15000.0 1874714.7 1249.8 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 1488.8 Signed-off-by: Jun Yi <yijun@loongson.cn> Signed-off-by: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@loongson.cn>
2022-12-10 22:39:59 +08:00
/* copy the remaining bytes */
LoongArch: Optimize memory ops (memset/memcpy/memmove) To optimize memset()/memcpy()/memmove() and so on, we use a jump table to dispatch cases for short data lengths; and for long data lengths, we split the destination into head part (first 8 bytes), tail part (last 8 bytes) and middle part. The head part and tail part may be at unaligned addresses, while the middle part is always aligned (the middle part is allowed to overlap the head/tail part). In this way, the first and last 8 bytes may be unaligned accesses, but we can make sure the data in the middle is processed at an aligned destination address. We have tested micro-bench[1] on a Loongson-3C5000 16-core machine (2.2GHz): 1. memset | length | src offset | dst offset | speed before | speed after | % | |--------|------------|------------|--------------|-------------|---------| | 8 | 0 | 0 | 696.191 | 1518.785 | 118.16% | | 8 | 0 | 1 | 696.325 | 1518.937 | 118.14% | | 50 | 0 | 0 | 969.976 | 8053.902 | 730.32% | | 50 | 0 | 1 | 970.034 | 8058.475 | 730.74% | | 300 | 0 | 0 | 5876.612 | 16544.703 | 181.53% | | 300 | 0 | 1 | 5030.849 | 16549.011 | 228.95% | | 1200 | 0 | 0 | 11797.077 | 16752.137 | 42.00% | | 1200 | 0 | 1 | 5687.141 | 16645.233 | 192.68% | | 4000 | 0 | 0 | 15723.27 | 16761.557 | 6.60% | | 4000 | 0 | 1 | 5906.114 | 16732.316 | 183.30% | | 8000 | 0 | 0 | 16751.403 | 16770.002 | 0.11% | | 8000 | 0 | 1 | 5995.449 | 16754.07 | 179.45% | 2. memcpy | length | src offset | dst offset | speed before | speed after | % | |--------|------------|------------|--------------|-------------|---------| | 8 | 0 | 0 | 696.2 | 1670.605 | 139.96% | | 8 | 0 | 1 | 696.325 | 1671.138 | 139.99% | | 50 | 0 | 0 | 969.974 | 8724.999 | 799.51% | | 50 | 0 | 1 | 970.032 | 8730.138 | 799.98% | | 300 | 0 | 0 | 5564.662 | 16272.652 | 192.43% | | 300 | 0 | 1 | 4670.436 | 14972.842 | 220.59% | | 1200 | 0 | 0 | 10740.23 | 16751.728 | 55.97% | | 1200 | 0 | 1 | 5027.741 | 14874.564 | 195.85% | | 4000 | 0 | 0 | 15122.367 | 16737.642 | 10.68% | | 4000 | 0 | 1 | 5536.918 | 14890.397 | 168.93% | | 8000 | 0 | 0 | 16505.453 | 16553.543 | 0.29% | | 8000 | 0 | 1 | 5821.619 | 14841.804 | 154.94% | 3. memmove | length | src offset | dst offset | speed before | speed after | % | |--------|------------|------------|--------------|-------------|---------| | 8 | 0 | 0 | 982.693 | 1670.568 | 70.00% | | 8 | 0 | 1 | 983.023 | 1671.174 | 70.00% | | 50 | 0 | 0 | 1230.87 | 8727.625 | 609.06% | | 50 | 0 | 1 | 1232.515 | 8730.138 | 608.32% | | 300 | 0 | 0 | 6490.375 | 16296.993 | 151.09% | | 300 | 0 | 1 | 4282.687 | 14972.842 | 249.61% | | 1200 | 0 | 0 | 11742.755 | 16752.546 | 42.66% | | 1200 | 0 | 1 | 5039.338 | 14872.951 | 195.14% | | 4000 | 0 | 0 | 15467.786 | 16737.09 | 8.21% | | 4000 | 0 | 1 | 5009.905 | 14890.542 | 197.22% | | 8000 | 0 | 0 | 16489.664 | 16553.273 | 0.39% | | 8000 | 0 | 1 | 5823.786 | 14858.646 | 155.14% | * speed: MB/s * length: byte [1] https://github.com/heiher/mem-bench Signed-off-by: WANG Rui <wangrui@loongson.cn> Signed-off-by: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@loongson.cn>
2023-05-01 17:19:43 +08:00
.Llt64:
addi.d a4, a3, -32
bgeu a1, a4, .Llt32
18: ld.d t0, a1, 0
19: ld.d t1, a1, 8
20: ld.d t2, a1, 16
21: ld.d t3, a1, 24
addi.d a1, a1, 32
22: st.d t0, a0, 0
23: st.d t1, a0, 8
24: st.d t2, a0, 16
25: st.d t3, a0, 24
addi.d a0, a0, 32
.Llt32:
addi.d a4, a3, -16
bgeu a1, a4, .Llt16
26: ld.d t0, a1, 0
27: ld.d t1, a1, 8
addi.d a1, a1, 16
28: st.d t0, a0, 0
29: st.d t1, a0, 8
addi.d a0, a0, 16
.Llt16:
addi.d a4, a3, -8
bgeu a1, a4, .Llt8
30: ld.d t0, a1, 0
31: st.d t0, a0, 0
.Llt8:
32: ld.d t0, a3, -8
33: st.d t0, a2, -8
LoongArch: Use alternative to optimize libraries Use the alternative to optimize common libraries according whether CPU has UAL (hardware unaligned access support) feature, including memset(), memcopy(), memmove(), copy_user() and clear_user(). We have tested UnixBench on a Loongson-3A5000 quad-core machine (1.6GHz): 1, One copy, before patch: System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 9566582.0 819.8 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 2805.3 510.1 Execl Throughput 43.0 2120.0 493.0 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 209833.0 529.9 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 89400.0 540.2 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 320036.0 551.8 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 340624.0 273.8 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 109939.1 274.8 Process Creation 126.0 4728.7 375.3 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 2223.1 524.3 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 883.1 1471.9 System Call Overhead 15000.0 518639.1 345.8 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 500.2 2, One copy, after patch: System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 9567674.7 819.9 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 2805.5 510.1 Execl Throughput 43.0 2392.7 556.4 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 417804.0 1055.1 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 112909.5 682.2 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1255207.4 2164.2 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 555712.0 446.7 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 99964.5 249.9 Process Creation 126.0 5192.5 412.1 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 2302.4 543.0 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 919.6 1532.6 System Call Overhead 15000.0 511159.3 340.8 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 640.1 3, Four copies, before patch: System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 38268610.5 3279.2 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 11222.2 2040.4 Execl Throughput 43.0 7892.0 1835.3 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 235149.6 593.8 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 74959.6 452.9 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 545048.5 939.7 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 1337359.0 1075.0 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 473663.9 1184.2 Process Creation 126.0 17491.2 1388.2 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 6865.7 1619.3 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1015.9 1693.1 System Call Overhead 15000.0 1899535.2 1266.4 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 1278.3 4, Four copies, after patch: System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 38272815.5 3279.6 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 11222.8 2040.5 Execl Throughput 43.0 8839.2 2055.6 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 313912.9 792.7 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 80976.1 489.3 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1176594.3 2028.6 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 2100941.9 1688.9 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 476696.4 1191.7 Process Creation 126.0 18394.7 1459.9 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 7172.2 1691.6 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1058.3 1763.9 System Call Overhead 15000.0 1874714.7 1249.8 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 1488.8 Signed-off-by: Jun Yi <yijun@loongson.cn> Signed-off-by: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@loongson.cn>
2022-12-10 22:39:59 +08:00
/* return */
LoongArch: Optimize memory ops (memset/memcpy/memmove) To optimize memset()/memcpy()/memmove() and so on, we use a jump table to dispatch cases for short data lengths; and for long data lengths, we split the destination into head part (first 8 bytes), tail part (last 8 bytes) and middle part. The head part and tail part may be at unaligned addresses, while the middle part is always aligned (the middle part is allowed to overlap the head/tail part). In this way, the first and last 8 bytes may be unaligned accesses, but we can make sure the data in the middle is processed at an aligned destination address. We have tested micro-bench[1] on a Loongson-3C5000 16-core machine (2.2GHz): 1. memset | length | src offset | dst offset | speed before | speed after | % | |--------|------------|------------|--------------|-------------|---------| | 8 | 0 | 0 | 696.191 | 1518.785 | 118.16% | | 8 | 0 | 1 | 696.325 | 1518.937 | 118.14% | | 50 | 0 | 0 | 969.976 | 8053.902 | 730.32% | | 50 | 0 | 1 | 970.034 | 8058.475 | 730.74% | | 300 | 0 | 0 | 5876.612 | 16544.703 | 181.53% | | 300 | 0 | 1 | 5030.849 | 16549.011 | 228.95% | | 1200 | 0 | 0 | 11797.077 | 16752.137 | 42.00% | | 1200 | 0 | 1 | 5687.141 | 16645.233 | 192.68% | | 4000 | 0 | 0 | 15723.27 | 16761.557 | 6.60% | | 4000 | 0 | 1 | 5906.114 | 16732.316 | 183.30% | | 8000 | 0 | 0 | 16751.403 | 16770.002 | 0.11% | | 8000 | 0 | 1 | 5995.449 | 16754.07 | 179.45% | 2. memcpy | length | src offset | dst offset | speed before | speed after | % | |--------|------------|------------|--------------|-------------|---------| | 8 | 0 | 0 | 696.2 | 1670.605 | 139.96% | | 8 | 0 | 1 | 696.325 | 1671.138 | 139.99% | | 50 | 0 | 0 | 969.974 | 8724.999 | 799.51% | | 50 | 0 | 1 | 970.032 | 8730.138 | 799.98% | | 300 | 0 | 0 | 5564.662 | 16272.652 | 192.43% | | 300 | 0 | 1 | 4670.436 | 14972.842 | 220.59% | | 1200 | 0 | 0 | 10740.23 | 16751.728 | 55.97% | | 1200 | 0 | 1 | 5027.741 | 14874.564 | 195.85% | | 4000 | 0 | 0 | 15122.367 | 16737.642 | 10.68% | | 4000 | 0 | 1 | 5536.918 | 14890.397 | 168.93% | | 8000 | 0 | 0 | 16505.453 | 16553.543 | 0.29% | | 8000 | 0 | 1 | 5821.619 | 14841.804 | 154.94% | 3. memmove | length | src offset | dst offset | speed before | speed after | % | |--------|------------|------------|--------------|-------------|---------| | 8 | 0 | 0 | 982.693 | 1670.568 | 70.00% | | 8 | 0 | 1 | 983.023 | 1671.174 | 70.00% | | 50 | 0 | 0 | 1230.87 | 8727.625 | 609.06% | | 50 | 0 | 1 | 1232.515 | 8730.138 | 608.32% | | 300 | 0 | 0 | 6490.375 | 16296.993 | 151.09% | | 300 | 0 | 1 | 4282.687 | 14972.842 | 249.61% | | 1200 | 0 | 0 | 11742.755 | 16752.546 | 42.66% | | 1200 | 0 | 1 | 5039.338 | 14872.951 | 195.14% | | 4000 | 0 | 0 | 15467.786 | 16737.09 | 8.21% | | 4000 | 0 | 1 | 5009.905 | 14890.542 | 197.22% | | 8000 | 0 | 0 | 16489.664 | 16553.273 | 0.39% | | 8000 | 0 | 1 | 5823.786 | 14858.646 | 155.14% | * speed: MB/s * length: byte [1] https://github.com/heiher/mem-bench Signed-off-by: WANG Rui <wangrui@loongson.cn> Signed-off-by: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@loongson.cn>
2023-05-01 17:19:43 +08:00
move a0, zero
jr ra
.align 5
.Lsmall:
pcaddi t0, 8
slli.d a3, a2, 5
add.d t0, t0, a3
jr t0
.align 5
move a0, zero
jr ra
.align 5
34: ld.b t0, a1, 0
35: st.b t0, a0, 0
move a0, zero
jr ra
.align 5
36: ld.h t0, a1, 0
37: st.h t0, a0, 0
move a0, zero
jr ra
.align 5
38: ld.h t0, a1, 0
39: ld.b t1, a1, 2
40: st.h t0, a0, 0
41: st.b t1, a0, 2
move a0, zero
jr ra
.align 5
42: ld.w t0, a1, 0
43: st.w t0, a0, 0
move a0, zero
jr ra
.align 5
44: ld.w t0, a1, 0
45: ld.b t1, a1, 4
46: st.w t0, a0, 0
47: st.b t1, a0, 4
move a0, zero
jr ra
.align 5
48: ld.w t0, a1, 0
49: ld.h t1, a1, 4
50: st.w t0, a0, 0
51: st.h t1, a0, 4
move a0, zero
jr ra
.align 5
52: ld.w t0, a1, 0
53: ld.w t1, a1, 3
54: st.w t0, a0, 0
55: st.w t1, a0, 3
move a0, zero
jr ra
.align 5
56: ld.d t0, a1, 0
57: st.d t0, a0, 0
move a0, zero
LoongArch: Use alternative to optimize libraries Use the alternative to optimize common libraries according whether CPU has UAL (hardware unaligned access support) feature, including memset(), memcopy(), memmove(), copy_user() and clear_user(). We have tested UnixBench on a Loongson-3A5000 quad-core machine (1.6GHz): 1, One copy, before patch: System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 9566582.0 819.8 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 2805.3 510.1 Execl Throughput 43.0 2120.0 493.0 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 209833.0 529.9 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 89400.0 540.2 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 320036.0 551.8 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 340624.0 273.8 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 109939.1 274.8 Process Creation 126.0 4728.7 375.3 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 2223.1 524.3 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 883.1 1471.9 System Call Overhead 15000.0 518639.1 345.8 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 500.2 2, One copy, after patch: System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 9567674.7 819.9 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 2805.5 510.1 Execl Throughput 43.0 2392.7 556.4 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 417804.0 1055.1 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 112909.5 682.2 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1255207.4 2164.2 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 555712.0 446.7 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 99964.5 249.9 Process Creation 126.0 5192.5 412.1 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 2302.4 543.0 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 919.6 1532.6 System Call Overhead 15000.0 511159.3 340.8 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 640.1 3, Four copies, before patch: System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 38268610.5 3279.2 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 11222.2 2040.4 Execl Throughput 43.0 7892.0 1835.3 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 235149.6 593.8 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 74959.6 452.9 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 545048.5 939.7 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 1337359.0 1075.0 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 473663.9 1184.2 Process Creation 126.0 17491.2 1388.2 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 6865.7 1619.3 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1015.9 1693.1 System Call Overhead 15000.0 1899535.2 1266.4 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 1278.3 4, Four copies, after patch: System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 38272815.5 3279.6 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 11222.8 2040.5 Execl Throughput 43.0 8839.2 2055.6 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 313912.9 792.7 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 80976.1 489.3 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1176594.3 2028.6 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 2100941.9 1688.9 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 476696.4 1191.7 Process Creation 126.0 18394.7 1459.9 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 7172.2 1691.6 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1058.3 1763.9 System Call Overhead 15000.0 1874714.7 1249.8 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 1488.8 Signed-off-by: Jun Yi <yijun@loongson.cn> Signed-off-by: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@loongson.cn>
2022-12-10 22:39:59 +08:00
jr ra
/* fixup and ex_table */
LoongArch: Optimize memory ops (memset/memcpy/memmove) To optimize memset()/memcpy()/memmove() and so on, we use a jump table to dispatch cases for short data lengths; and for long data lengths, we split the destination into head part (first 8 bytes), tail part (last 8 bytes) and middle part. The head part and tail part may be at unaligned addresses, while the middle part is always aligned (the middle part is allowed to overlap the head/tail part). In this way, the first and last 8 bytes may be unaligned accesses, but we can make sure the data in the middle is processed at an aligned destination address. We have tested micro-bench[1] on a Loongson-3C5000 16-core machine (2.2GHz): 1. memset | length | src offset | dst offset | speed before | speed after | % | |--------|------------|------------|--------------|-------------|---------| | 8 | 0 | 0 | 696.191 | 1518.785 | 118.16% | | 8 | 0 | 1 | 696.325 | 1518.937 | 118.14% | | 50 | 0 | 0 | 969.976 | 8053.902 | 730.32% | | 50 | 0 | 1 | 970.034 | 8058.475 | 730.74% | | 300 | 0 | 0 | 5876.612 | 16544.703 | 181.53% | | 300 | 0 | 1 | 5030.849 | 16549.011 | 228.95% | | 1200 | 0 | 0 | 11797.077 | 16752.137 | 42.00% | | 1200 | 0 | 1 | 5687.141 | 16645.233 | 192.68% | | 4000 | 0 | 0 | 15723.27 | 16761.557 | 6.60% | | 4000 | 0 | 1 | 5906.114 | 16732.316 | 183.30% | | 8000 | 0 | 0 | 16751.403 | 16770.002 | 0.11% | | 8000 | 0 | 1 | 5995.449 | 16754.07 | 179.45% | 2. memcpy | length | src offset | dst offset | speed before | speed after | % | |--------|------------|------------|--------------|-------------|---------| | 8 | 0 | 0 | 696.2 | 1670.605 | 139.96% | | 8 | 0 | 1 | 696.325 | 1671.138 | 139.99% | | 50 | 0 | 0 | 969.974 | 8724.999 | 799.51% | | 50 | 0 | 1 | 970.032 | 8730.138 | 799.98% | | 300 | 0 | 0 | 5564.662 | 16272.652 | 192.43% | | 300 | 0 | 1 | 4670.436 | 14972.842 | 220.59% | | 1200 | 0 | 0 | 10740.23 | 16751.728 | 55.97% | | 1200 | 0 | 1 | 5027.741 | 14874.564 | 195.85% | | 4000 | 0 | 0 | 15122.367 | 16737.642 | 10.68% | | 4000 | 0 | 1 | 5536.918 | 14890.397 | 168.93% | | 8000 | 0 | 0 | 16505.453 | 16553.543 | 0.29% | | 8000 | 0 | 1 | 5821.619 | 14841.804 | 154.94% | 3. memmove | length | src offset | dst offset | speed before | speed after | % | |--------|------------|------------|--------------|-------------|---------| | 8 | 0 | 0 | 982.693 | 1670.568 | 70.00% | | 8 | 0 | 1 | 983.023 | 1671.174 | 70.00% | | 50 | 0 | 0 | 1230.87 | 8727.625 | 609.06% | | 50 | 0 | 1 | 1232.515 | 8730.138 | 608.32% | | 300 | 0 | 0 | 6490.375 | 16296.993 | 151.09% | | 300 | 0 | 1 | 4282.687 | 14972.842 | 249.61% | | 1200 | 0 | 0 | 11742.755 | 16752.546 | 42.66% | | 1200 | 0 | 1 | 5039.338 | 14872.951 | 195.14% | | 4000 | 0 | 0 | 15467.786 | 16737.09 | 8.21% | | 4000 | 0 | 1 | 5009.905 | 14890.542 | 197.22% | | 8000 | 0 | 0 | 16489.664 | 16553.273 | 0.39% | | 8000 | 0 | 1 | 5823.786 | 14858.646 | 155.14% | * speed: MB/s * length: byte [1] https://github.com/heiher/mem-bench Signed-off-by: WANG Rui <wangrui@loongson.cn> Signed-off-by: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@loongson.cn>
2023-05-01 17:19:43 +08:00
_asm_extable 0b, .L_fixup_handle_0
LoongArch: Use alternative to optimize libraries Use the alternative to optimize common libraries according whether CPU has UAL (hardware unaligned access support) feature, including memset(), memcopy(), memmove(), copy_user() and clear_user(). We have tested UnixBench on a Loongson-3A5000 quad-core machine (1.6GHz): 1, One copy, before patch: System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 9566582.0 819.8 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 2805.3 510.1 Execl Throughput 43.0 2120.0 493.0 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 209833.0 529.9 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 89400.0 540.2 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 320036.0 551.8 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 340624.0 273.8 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 109939.1 274.8 Process Creation 126.0 4728.7 375.3 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 2223.1 524.3 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 883.1 1471.9 System Call Overhead 15000.0 518639.1 345.8 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 500.2 2, One copy, after patch: System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 9567674.7 819.9 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 2805.5 510.1 Execl Throughput 43.0 2392.7 556.4 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 417804.0 1055.1 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 112909.5 682.2 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1255207.4 2164.2 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 555712.0 446.7 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 99964.5 249.9 Process Creation 126.0 5192.5 412.1 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 2302.4 543.0 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 919.6 1532.6 System Call Overhead 15000.0 511159.3 340.8 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 640.1 3, Four copies, before patch: System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 38268610.5 3279.2 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 11222.2 2040.4 Execl Throughput 43.0 7892.0 1835.3 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 235149.6 593.8 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 74959.6 452.9 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 545048.5 939.7 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 1337359.0 1075.0 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 473663.9 1184.2 Process Creation 126.0 17491.2 1388.2 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 6865.7 1619.3 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1015.9 1693.1 System Call Overhead 15000.0 1899535.2 1266.4 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 1278.3 4, Four copies, after patch: System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 38272815.5 3279.6 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 11222.8 2040.5 Execl Throughput 43.0 8839.2 2055.6 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 313912.9 792.7 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 80976.1 489.3 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1176594.3 2028.6 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 2100941.9 1688.9 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 476696.4 1191.7 Process Creation 126.0 18394.7 1459.9 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 7172.2 1691.6 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1058.3 1763.9 System Call Overhead 15000.0 1874714.7 1249.8 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 1488.8 Signed-off-by: Jun Yi <yijun@loongson.cn> Signed-off-by: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@loongson.cn>
2022-12-10 22:39:59 +08:00
_asm_extable 1b, .L_fixup_handle_0
LoongArch: Optimize memory ops (memset/memcpy/memmove) To optimize memset()/memcpy()/memmove() and so on, we use a jump table to dispatch cases for short data lengths; and for long data lengths, we split the destination into head part (first 8 bytes), tail part (last 8 bytes) and middle part. The head part and tail part may be at unaligned addresses, while the middle part is always aligned (the middle part is allowed to overlap the head/tail part). In this way, the first and last 8 bytes may be unaligned accesses, but we can make sure the data in the middle is processed at an aligned destination address. We have tested micro-bench[1] on a Loongson-3C5000 16-core machine (2.2GHz): 1. memset | length | src offset | dst offset | speed before | speed after | % | |--------|------------|------------|--------------|-------------|---------| | 8 | 0 | 0 | 696.191 | 1518.785 | 118.16% | | 8 | 0 | 1 | 696.325 | 1518.937 | 118.14% | | 50 | 0 | 0 | 969.976 | 8053.902 | 730.32% | | 50 | 0 | 1 | 970.034 | 8058.475 | 730.74% | | 300 | 0 | 0 | 5876.612 | 16544.703 | 181.53% | | 300 | 0 | 1 | 5030.849 | 16549.011 | 228.95% | | 1200 | 0 | 0 | 11797.077 | 16752.137 | 42.00% | | 1200 | 0 | 1 | 5687.141 | 16645.233 | 192.68% | | 4000 | 0 | 0 | 15723.27 | 16761.557 | 6.60% | | 4000 | 0 | 1 | 5906.114 | 16732.316 | 183.30% | | 8000 | 0 | 0 | 16751.403 | 16770.002 | 0.11% | | 8000 | 0 | 1 | 5995.449 | 16754.07 | 179.45% | 2. memcpy | length | src offset | dst offset | speed before | speed after | % | |--------|------------|------------|--------------|-------------|---------| | 8 | 0 | 0 | 696.2 | 1670.605 | 139.96% | | 8 | 0 | 1 | 696.325 | 1671.138 | 139.99% | | 50 | 0 | 0 | 969.974 | 8724.999 | 799.51% | | 50 | 0 | 1 | 970.032 | 8730.138 | 799.98% | | 300 | 0 | 0 | 5564.662 | 16272.652 | 192.43% | | 300 | 0 | 1 | 4670.436 | 14972.842 | 220.59% | | 1200 | 0 | 0 | 10740.23 | 16751.728 | 55.97% | | 1200 | 0 | 1 | 5027.741 | 14874.564 | 195.85% | | 4000 | 0 | 0 | 15122.367 | 16737.642 | 10.68% | | 4000 | 0 | 1 | 5536.918 | 14890.397 | 168.93% | | 8000 | 0 | 0 | 16505.453 | 16553.543 | 0.29% | | 8000 | 0 | 1 | 5821.619 | 14841.804 | 154.94% | 3. memmove | length | src offset | dst offset | speed before | speed after | % | |--------|------------|------------|--------------|-------------|---------| | 8 | 0 | 0 | 982.693 | 1670.568 | 70.00% | | 8 | 0 | 1 | 983.023 | 1671.174 | 70.00% | | 50 | 0 | 0 | 1230.87 | 8727.625 | 609.06% | | 50 | 0 | 1 | 1232.515 | 8730.138 | 608.32% | | 300 | 0 | 0 | 6490.375 | 16296.993 | 151.09% | | 300 | 0 | 1 | 4282.687 | 14972.842 | 249.61% | | 1200 | 0 | 0 | 11742.755 | 16752.546 | 42.66% | | 1200 | 0 | 1 | 5039.338 | 14872.951 | 195.14% | | 4000 | 0 | 0 | 15467.786 | 16737.09 | 8.21% | | 4000 | 0 | 1 | 5009.905 | 14890.542 | 197.22% | | 8000 | 0 | 0 | 16489.664 | 16553.273 | 0.39% | | 8000 | 0 | 1 | 5823.786 | 14858.646 | 155.14% | * speed: MB/s * length: byte [1] https://github.com/heiher/mem-bench Signed-off-by: WANG Rui <wangrui@loongson.cn> Signed-off-by: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@loongson.cn>
2023-05-01 17:19:43 +08:00
_asm_extable 2b, .L_fixup_handle_0
_asm_extable 3b, .L_fixup_handle_0
_asm_extable 4b, .L_fixup_handle_0
_asm_extable 5b, .L_fixup_handle_0
_asm_extable 6b, .L_fixup_handle_0
_asm_extable 7b, .L_fixup_handle_0
_asm_extable 8b, .L_fixup_handle_0
LoongArch: Use alternative to optimize libraries Use the alternative to optimize common libraries according whether CPU has UAL (hardware unaligned access support) feature, including memset(), memcopy(), memmove(), copy_user() and clear_user(). We have tested UnixBench on a Loongson-3A5000 quad-core machine (1.6GHz): 1, One copy, before patch: System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 9566582.0 819.8 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 2805.3 510.1 Execl Throughput 43.0 2120.0 493.0 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 209833.0 529.9 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 89400.0 540.2 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 320036.0 551.8 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 340624.0 273.8 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 109939.1 274.8 Process Creation 126.0 4728.7 375.3 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 2223.1 524.3 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 883.1 1471.9 System Call Overhead 15000.0 518639.1 345.8 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 500.2 2, One copy, after patch: System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 9567674.7 819.9 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 2805.5 510.1 Execl Throughput 43.0 2392.7 556.4 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 417804.0 1055.1 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 112909.5 682.2 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1255207.4 2164.2 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 555712.0 446.7 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 99964.5 249.9 Process Creation 126.0 5192.5 412.1 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 2302.4 543.0 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 919.6 1532.6 System Call Overhead 15000.0 511159.3 340.8 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 640.1 3, Four copies, before patch: System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 38268610.5 3279.2 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 11222.2 2040.4 Execl Throughput 43.0 7892.0 1835.3 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 235149.6 593.8 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 74959.6 452.9 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 545048.5 939.7 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 1337359.0 1075.0 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 473663.9 1184.2 Process Creation 126.0 17491.2 1388.2 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 6865.7 1619.3 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1015.9 1693.1 System Call Overhead 15000.0 1899535.2 1266.4 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 1278.3 4, Four copies, after patch: System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 38272815.5 3279.6 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 11222.8 2040.5 Execl Throughput 43.0 8839.2 2055.6 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 313912.9 792.7 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 80976.1 489.3 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1176594.3 2028.6 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 2100941.9 1688.9 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 476696.4 1191.7 Process Creation 126.0 18394.7 1459.9 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 7172.2 1691.6 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1058.3 1763.9 System Call Overhead 15000.0 1874714.7 1249.8 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 1488.8 Signed-off-by: Jun Yi <yijun@loongson.cn> Signed-off-by: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@loongson.cn>
2022-12-10 22:39:59 +08:00
_asm_extable 9b, .L_fixup_handle_0
LoongArch: Optimize memory ops (memset/memcpy/memmove) To optimize memset()/memcpy()/memmove() and so on, we use a jump table to dispatch cases for short data lengths; and for long data lengths, we split the destination into head part (first 8 bytes), tail part (last 8 bytes) and middle part. The head part and tail part may be at unaligned addresses, while the middle part is always aligned (the middle part is allowed to overlap the head/tail part). In this way, the first and last 8 bytes may be unaligned accesses, but we can make sure the data in the middle is processed at an aligned destination address. We have tested micro-bench[1] on a Loongson-3C5000 16-core machine (2.2GHz): 1. memset | length | src offset | dst offset | speed before | speed after | % | |--------|------------|------------|--------------|-------------|---------| | 8 | 0 | 0 | 696.191 | 1518.785 | 118.16% | | 8 | 0 | 1 | 696.325 | 1518.937 | 118.14% | | 50 | 0 | 0 | 969.976 | 8053.902 | 730.32% | | 50 | 0 | 1 | 970.034 | 8058.475 | 730.74% | | 300 | 0 | 0 | 5876.612 | 16544.703 | 181.53% | | 300 | 0 | 1 | 5030.849 | 16549.011 | 228.95% | | 1200 | 0 | 0 | 11797.077 | 16752.137 | 42.00% | | 1200 | 0 | 1 | 5687.141 | 16645.233 | 192.68% | | 4000 | 0 | 0 | 15723.27 | 16761.557 | 6.60% | | 4000 | 0 | 1 | 5906.114 | 16732.316 | 183.30% | | 8000 | 0 | 0 | 16751.403 | 16770.002 | 0.11% | | 8000 | 0 | 1 | 5995.449 | 16754.07 | 179.45% | 2. memcpy | length | src offset | dst offset | speed before | speed after | % | |--------|------------|------------|--------------|-------------|---------| | 8 | 0 | 0 | 696.2 | 1670.605 | 139.96% | | 8 | 0 | 1 | 696.325 | 1671.138 | 139.99% | | 50 | 0 | 0 | 969.974 | 8724.999 | 799.51% | | 50 | 0 | 1 | 970.032 | 8730.138 | 799.98% | | 300 | 0 | 0 | 5564.662 | 16272.652 | 192.43% | | 300 | 0 | 1 | 4670.436 | 14972.842 | 220.59% | | 1200 | 0 | 0 | 10740.23 | 16751.728 | 55.97% | | 1200 | 0 | 1 | 5027.741 | 14874.564 | 195.85% | | 4000 | 0 | 0 | 15122.367 | 16737.642 | 10.68% | | 4000 | 0 | 1 | 5536.918 | 14890.397 | 168.93% | | 8000 | 0 | 0 | 16505.453 | 16553.543 | 0.29% | | 8000 | 0 | 1 | 5821.619 | 14841.804 | 154.94% | 3. memmove | length | src offset | dst offset | speed before | speed after | % | |--------|------------|------------|--------------|-------------|---------| | 8 | 0 | 0 | 982.693 | 1670.568 | 70.00% | | 8 | 0 | 1 | 983.023 | 1671.174 | 70.00% | | 50 | 0 | 0 | 1230.87 | 8727.625 | 609.06% | | 50 | 0 | 1 | 1232.515 | 8730.138 | 608.32% | | 300 | 0 | 0 | 6490.375 | 16296.993 | 151.09% | | 300 | 0 | 1 | 4282.687 | 14972.842 | 249.61% | | 1200 | 0 | 0 | 11742.755 | 16752.546 | 42.66% | | 1200 | 0 | 1 | 5039.338 | 14872.951 | 195.14% | | 4000 | 0 | 0 | 15467.786 | 16737.09 | 8.21% | | 4000 | 0 | 1 | 5009.905 | 14890.542 | 197.22% | | 8000 | 0 | 0 | 16489.664 | 16553.273 | 0.39% | | 8000 | 0 | 1 | 5823.786 | 14858.646 | 155.14% | * speed: MB/s * length: byte [1] https://github.com/heiher/mem-bench Signed-off-by: WANG Rui <wangrui@loongson.cn> Signed-off-by: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@loongson.cn>
2023-05-01 17:19:43 +08:00
_asm_extable 10b, .L_fixup_handle_0
_asm_extable 11b, .L_fixup_handle_1
_asm_extable 12b, .L_fixup_handle_2
_asm_extable 13b, .L_fixup_handle_3
_asm_extable 14b, .L_fixup_handle_4
_asm_extable 15b, .L_fixup_handle_5
_asm_extable 16b, .L_fixup_handle_6
_asm_extable 17b, .L_fixup_handle_7
LoongArch: Use alternative to optimize libraries Use the alternative to optimize common libraries according whether CPU has UAL (hardware unaligned access support) feature, including memset(), memcopy(), memmove(), copy_user() and clear_user(). We have tested UnixBench on a Loongson-3A5000 quad-core machine (1.6GHz): 1, One copy, before patch: System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 9566582.0 819.8 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 2805.3 510.1 Execl Throughput 43.0 2120.0 493.0 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 209833.0 529.9 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 89400.0 540.2 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 320036.0 551.8 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 340624.0 273.8 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 109939.1 274.8 Process Creation 126.0 4728.7 375.3 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 2223.1 524.3 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 883.1 1471.9 System Call Overhead 15000.0 518639.1 345.8 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 500.2 2, One copy, after patch: System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 9567674.7 819.9 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 2805.5 510.1 Execl Throughput 43.0 2392.7 556.4 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 417804.0 1055.1 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 112909.5 682.2 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1255207.4 2164.2 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 555712.0 446.7 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 99964.5 249.9 Process Creation 126.0 5192.5 412.1 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 2302.4 543.0 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 919.6 1532.6 System Call Overhead 15000.0 511159.3 340.8 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 640.1 3, Four copies, before patch: System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 38268610.5 3279.2 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 11222.2 2040.4 Execl Throughput 43.0 7892.0 1835.3 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 235149.6 593.8 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 74959.6 452.9 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 545048.5 939.7 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 1337359.0 1075.0 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 473663.9 1184.2 Process Creation 126.0 17491.2 1388.2 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 6865.7 1619.3 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1015.9 1693.1 System Call Overhead 15000.0 1899535.2 1266.4 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 1278.3 4, Four copies, after patch: System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 38272815.5 3279.6 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 11222.8 2040.5 Execl Throughput 43.0 8839.2 2055.6 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 313912.9 792.7 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 80976.1 489.3 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1176594.3 2028.6 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 2100941.9 1688.9 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 476696.4 1191.7 Process Creation 126.0 18394.7 1459.9 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 7172.2 1691.6 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1058.3 1763.9 System Call Overhead 15000.0 1874714.7 1249.8 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 1488.8 Signed-off-by: Jun Yi <yijun@loongson.cn> Signed-off-by: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@loongson.cn>
2022-12-10 22:39:59 +08:00
_asm_extable 18b, .L_fixup_handle_0
LoongArch: Optimize memory ops (memset/memcpy/memmove) To optimize memset()/memcpy()/memmove() and so on, we use a jump table to dispatch cases for short data lengths; and for long data lengths, we split the destination into head part (first 8 bytes), tail part (last 8 bytes) and middle part. The head part and tail part may be at unaligned addresses, while the middle part is always aligned (the middle part is allowed to overlap the head/tail part). In this way, the first and last 8 bytes may be unaligned accesses, but we can make sure the data in the middle is processed at an aligned destination address. We have tested micro-bench[1] on a Loongson-3C5000 16-core machine (2.2GHz): 1. memset | length | src offset | dst offset | speed before | speed after | % | |--------|------------|------------|--------------|-------------|---------| | 8 | 0 | 0 | 696.191 | 1518.785 | 118.16% | | 8 | 0 | 1 | 696.325 | 1518.937 | 118.14% | | 50 | 0 | 0 | 969.976 | 8053.902 | 730.32% | | 50 | 0 | 1 | 970.034 | 8058.475 | 730.74% | | 300 | 0 | 0 | 5876.612 | 16544.703 | 181.53% | | 300 | 0 | 1 | 5030.849 | 16549.011 | 228.95% | | 1200 | 0 | 0 | 11797.077 | 16752.137 | 42.00% | | 1200 | 0 | 1 | 5687.141 | 16645.233 | 192.68% | | 4000 | 0 | 0 | 15723.27 | 16761.557 | 6.60% | | 4000 | 0 | 1 | 5906.114 | 16732.316 | 183.30% | | 8000 | 0 | 0 | 16751.403 | 16770.002 | 0.11% | | 8000 | 0 | 1 | 5995.449 | 16754.07 | 179.45% | 2. memcpy | length | src offset | dst offset | speed before | speed after | % | |--------|------------|------------|--------------|-------------|---------| | 8 | 0 | 0 | 696.2 | 1670.605 | 139.96% | | 8 | 0 | 1 | 696.325 | 1671.138 | 139.99% | | 50 | 0 | 0 | 969.974 | 8724.999 | 799.51% | | 50 | 0 | 1 | 970.032 | 8730.138 | 799.98% | | 300 | 0 | 0 | 5564.662 | 16272.652 | 192.43% | | 300 | 0 | 1 | 4670.436 | 14972.842 | 220.59% | | 1200 | 0 | 0 | 10740.23 | 16751.728 | 55.97% | | 1200 | 0 | 1 | 5027.741 | 14874.564 | 195.85% | | 4000 | 0 | 0 | 15122.367 | 16737.642 | 10.68% | | 4000 | 0 | 1 | 5536.918 | 14890.397 | 168.93% | | 8000 | 0 | 0 | 16505.453 | 16553.543 | 0.29% | | 8000 | 0 | 1 | 5821.619 | 14841.804 | 154.94% | 3. memmove | length | src offset | dst offset | speed before | speed after | % | |--------|------------|------------|--------------|-------------|---------| | 8 | 0 | 0 | 982.693 | 1670.568 | 70.00% | | 8 | 0 | 1 | 983.023 | 1671.174 | 70.00% | | 50 | 0 | 0 | 1230.87 | 8727.625 | 609.06% | | 50 | 0 | 1 | 1232.515 | 8730.138 | 608.32% | | 300 | 0 | 0 | 6490.375 | 16296.993 | 151.09% | | 300 | 0 | 1 | 4282.687 | 14972.842 | 249.61% | | 1200 | 0 | 0 | 11742.755 | 16752.546 | 42.66% | | 1200 | 0 | 1 | 5039.338 | 14872.951 | 195.14% | | 4000 | 0 | 0 | 15467.786 | 16737.09 | 8.21% | | 4000 | 0 | 1 | 5009.905 | 14890.542 | 197.22% | | 8000 | 0 | 0 | 16489.664 | 16553.273 | 0.39% | | 8000 | 0 | 1 | 5823.786 | 14858.646 | 155.14% | * speed: MB/s * length: byte [1] https://github.com/heiher/mem-bench Signed-off-by: WANG Rui <wangrui@loongson.cn> Signed-off-by: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@loongson.cn>
2023-05-01 17:19:43 +08:00
_asm_extable 19b, .L_fixup_handle_0
_asm_extable 20b, .L_fixup_handle_0
_asm_extable 21b, .L_fixup_handle_0
_asm_extable 22b, .L_fixup_handle_0
_asm_extable 23b, .L_fixup_handle_1
_asm_extable 24b, .L_fixup_handle_2
_asm_extable 25b, .L_fixup_handle_3
_asm_extable 26b, .L_fixup_handle_0
_asm_extable 27b, .L_fixup_handle_0
_asm_extable 28b, .L_fixup_handle_0
_asm_extable 29b, .L_fixup_handle_1
_asm_extable 30b, .L_fixup_handle_0
_asm_extable 31b, .L_fixup_handle_0
_asm_extable 32b, .L_fixup_handle_0
_asm_extable 33b, .L_fixup_handle_1
_asm_extable 34b, .L_fixup_handle_s0
_asm_extable 35b, .L_fixup_handle_s0
_asm_extable 36b, .L_fixup_handle_s0
_asm_extable 37b, .L_fixup_handle_s0
_asm_extable 38b, .L_fixup_handle_s0
_asm_extable 39b, .L_fixup_handle_s0
_asm_extable 40b, .L_fixup_handle_s0
_asm_extable 41b, .L_fixup_handle_s2
_asm_extable 42b, .L_fixup_handle_s0
_asm_extable 43b, .L_fixup_handle_s0
_asm_extable 44b, .L_fixup_handle_s0
_asm_extable 45b, .L_fixup_handle_s0
_asm_extable 46b, .L_fixup_handle_s0
_asm_extable 47b, .L_fixup_handle_s4
_asm_extable 48b, .L_fixup_handle_s0
_asm_extable 49b, .L_fixup_handle_s0
_asm_extable 50b, .L_fixup_handle_s0
_asm_extable 51b, .L_fixup_handle_s4
_asm_extable 52b, .L_fixup_handle_s0
_asm_extable 53b, .L_fixup_handle_s0
_asm_extable 54b, .L_fixup_handle_s0
_asm_extable 55b, .L_fixup_handle_s4
_asm_extable 56b, .L_fixup_handle_s0
_asm_extable 57b, .L_fixup_handle_s0
LoongArch: Use alternative to optimize libraries Use the alternative to optimize common libraries according whether CPU has UAL (hardware unaligned access support) feature, including memset(), memcopy(), memmove(), copy_user() and clear_user(). We have tested UnixBench on a Loongson-3A5000 quad-core machine (1.6GHz): 1, One copy, before patch: System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 9566582.0 819.8 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 2805.3 510.1 Execl Throughput 43.0 2120.0 493.0 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 209833.0 529.9 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 89400.0 540.2 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 320036.0 551.8 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 340624.0 273.8 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 109939.1 274.8 Process Creation 126.0 4728.7 375.3 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 2223.1 524.3 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 883.1 1471.9 System Call Overhead 15000.0 518639.1 345.8 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 500.2 2, One copy, after patch: System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 9567674.7 819.9 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 2805.5 510.1 Execl Throughput 43.0 2392.7 556.4 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 417804.0 1055.1 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 112909.5 682.2 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1255207.4 2164.2 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 555712.0 446.7 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 99964.5 249.9 Process Creation 126.0 5192.5 412.1 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 2302.4 543.0 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 919.6 1532.6 System Call Overhead 15000.0 511159.3 340.8 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 640.1 3, Four copies, before patch: System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 38268610.5 3279.2 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 11222.2 2040.4 Execl Throughput 43.0 7892.0 1835.3 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 235149.6 593.8 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 74959.6 452.9 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 545048.5 939.7 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 1337359.0 1075.0 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 473663.9 1184.2 Process Creation 126.0 17491.2 1388.2 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 6865.7 1619.3 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1015.9 1693.1 System Call Overhead 15000.0 1899535.2 1266.4 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 1278.3 4, Four copies, after patch: System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 38272815.5 3279.6 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 11222.8 2040.5 Execl Throughput 43.0 8839.2 2055.6 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 313912.9 792.7 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 80976.1 489.3 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1176594.3 2028.6 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 2100941.9 1688.9 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 476696.4 1191.7 Process Creation 126.0 18394.7 1459.9 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 7172.2 1691.6 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1058.3 1763.9 System Call Overhead 15000.0 1874714.7 1249.8 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 1488.8 Signed-off-by: Jun Yi <yijun@loongson.cn> Signed-off-by: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@loongson.cn>
2022-12-10 22:39:59 +08:00
SYM_FUNC_END(__copy_user_fast)
Reference in New Issue Copy Permalink