mirror of
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git
synced 2024-12-28 16:52:18 +00:00
bcachefs: Fix needs_whiteout BUG_ON() in bkey_sort()
Btree nodes are log structured; thus, we need to emit whiteouts when we're deleting a key that's been written out to disk. k->needs_whiteout tracks whether a key will need a whiteout when it's deleted, and this requires some careful handling; e.g. the key we're deleting may not have been written out to disk, but it may have overwritten a key that was - thus we need to carry this flag around on overwrites. Invariants: There may be multiple key for the same position in a given node (because of overwrites), but only one of them will be a live (non deleted) key, and only one key for a given position will have the needs_whiteout flag set. Additionally, we don't want to carry around whiteouts that need to be written in the main searchable part of a btree node - btree_iter_peek() will have to skip past them, and this can lead to an O(n^2) issues when doing sequential deletions (e.g. inode rm/truncate). So there's a separate region in the btree node buffer for unwritten whiteouts; these are merge sorted with the rest of the keys we're writing in the btree node write path. The unwritten whiteouts was a later optimization that bch2_sort_keys() didn't take into account; the unwritten whiteouts area means that we never have deleted keys with needs_whiteout set in the main searchable part of a btree node. That means we can simplify and optimize some sort paths, and eliminate an assertion that syzbot found: - Unless we're in the btree node write path, it's always ok to drop whiteouts when sorting - When sorting for a btree node write, we drop the whiteout if it's not from the unwritten whiteouts area, or if it's overwritten by a real key at the same position. This completely eliminates some tricky logic for propagating the needs_whiteout flag: syzbot was able to hit the assertion that checked that there shouldn't be more than one key at the same pos with needs_whiteout set, likely due to a combination of flipping on needs_whiteout on all written keys (they need whiteouts if overwritten), combined with not always dropping unneeded whiteouts, and the tricky logic in the sort path for preserving needs_whiteout that wasn't really needed. Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
This commit is contained in:
parent
5ad1f33c29
commit
5dfd3746b6
@ -6,9 +6,9 @@
|
||||
#include "bset.h"
|
||||
#include "extents.h"
|
||||
|
||||
typedef int (*sort_cmp_fn)(struct btree *,
|
||||
struct bkey_packed *,
|
||||
struct bkey_packed *);
|
||||
typedef int (*sort_cmp_fn)(const struct btree *,
|
||||
const struct bkey_packed *,
|
||||
const struct bkey_packed *);
|
||||
|
||||
static inline bool sort_iter_end(struct sort_iter *iter)
|
||||
{
|
||||
@ -70,9 +70,9 @@ static inline struct bkey_packed *sort_iter_next(struct sort_iter *iter,
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* If keys compare equal, compare by pointer order:
|
||||
*/
|
||||
static inline int key_sort_fix_overlapping_cmp(struct btree *b,
|
||||
struct bkey_packed *l,
|
||||
struct bkey_packed *r)
|
||||
static inline int key_sort_fix_overlapping_cmp(const struct btree *b,
|
||||
const struct bkey_packed *l,
|
||||
const struct bkey_packed *r)
|
||||
{
|
||||
return bch2_bkey_cmp_packed(b, l, r) ?:
|
||||
cmp_int((unsigned long) l, (unsigned long) r);
|
||||
@ -154,46 +154,59 @@ bch2_sort_repack(struct bset *dst, struct btree *src,
|
||||
return nr;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static inline int sort_keys_cmp(struct btree *b,
|
||||
struct bkey_packed *l,
|
||||
struct bkey_packed *r)
|
||||
static inline int keep_unwritten_whiteouts_cmp(const struct btree *b,
|
||||
const struct bkey_packed *l,
|
||||
const struct bkey_packed *r)
|
||||
{
|
||||
return bch2_bkey_cmp_packed_inlined(b, l, r) ?:
|
||||
(int) bkey_deleted(r) - (int) bkey_deleted(l) ?:
|
||||
(int) l->needs_whiteout - (int) r->needs_whiteout;
|
||||
(long) l - (long) r;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
unsigned bch2_sort_keys(struct bkey_packed *dst,
|
||||
struct sort_iter *iter,
|
||||
bool filter_whiteouts)
|
||||
#include "btree_update_interior.h"
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* For sorting in the btree node write path: whiteouts not in the unwritten
|
||||
* whiteouts area are dropped, whiteouts in the unwritten whiteouts area are
|
||||
* dropped if overwritten by real keys:
|
||||
*/
|
||||
unsigned bch2_sort_keys_keep_unwritten_whiteouts(struct bkey_packed *dst, struct sort_iter *iter)
|
||||
{
|
||||
const struct bkey_format *f = &iter->b->format;
|
||||
struct bkey_packed *in, *next, *out = dst;
|
||||
|
||||
sort_iter_sort(iter, sort_keys_cmp);
|
||||
sort_iter_sort(iter, keep_unwritten_whiteouts_cmp);
|
||||
|
||||
while ((in = sort_iter_next(iter, sort_keys_cmp))) {
|
||||
bool needs_whiteout = false;
|
||||
|
||||
if (bkey_deleted(in) &&
|
||||
(filter_whiteouts || !in->needs_whiteout))
|
||||
while ((in = sort_iter_next(iter, keep_unwritten_whiteouts_cmp))) {
|
||||
if (bkey_deleted(in) && in < unwritten_whiteouts_start(iter->b))
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
|
||||
while ((next = sort_iter_peek(iter)) &&
|
||||
!bch2_bkey_cmp_packed_inlined(iter->b, in, next)) {
|
||||
BUG_ON(in->needs_whiteout &&
|
||||
next->needs_whiteout);
|
||||
needs_whiteout |= in->needs_whiteout;
|
||||
in = sort_iter_next(iter, sort_keys_cmp);
|
||||
}
|
||||
if ((next = sort_iter_peek(iter)) &&
|
||||
!bch2_bkey_cmp_packed_inlined(iter->b, in, next))
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
|
||||
if (bkey_deleted(in)) {
|
||||
memcpy_u64s_small(out, in, bkeyp_key_u64s(f, in));
|
||||
set_bkeyp_val_u64s(f, out, 0);
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
bkey_p_copy(out, in);
|
||||
}
|
||||
out->needs_whiteout |= needs_whiteout;
|
||||
bkey_p_copy(out, in);
|
||||
out = bkey_p_next(out);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
return (u64 *) out - (u64 *) dst;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Main sort routine for compacting a btree node in memory: we always drop
|
||||
* whiteouts because any whiteouts that need to be written are in the unwritten
|
||||
* whiteouts area:
|
||||
*/
|
||||
unsigned bch2_sort_keys(struct bkey_packed *dst, struct sort_iter *iter)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct bkey_packed *in, *out = dst;
|
||||
|
||||
sort_iter_sort(iter, bch2_bkey_cmp_packed_inlined);
|
||||
|
||||
while ((in = sort_iter_next(iter, bch2_bkey_cmp_packed_inlined))) {
|
||||
if (bkey_deleted(in))
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
|
||||
bkey_p_copy(out, in);
|
||||
out = bkey_p_next(out);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ bch2_sort_repack(struct bset *, struct btree *,
|
||||
struct btree_node_iter *,
|
||||
struct bkey_format *, bool);
|
||||
|
||||
unsigned bch2_sort_keys(struct bkey_packed *,
|
||||
struct sort_iter *, bool);
|
||||
unsigned bch2_sort_keys_keep_unwritten_whiteouts(struct bkey_packed *, struct sort_iter *);
|
||||
unsigned bch2_sort_keys(struct bkey_packed *, struct sort_iter *);
|
||||
|
||||
#endif /* _BCACHEFS_BKEY_SORT_H */
|
||||
|
@ -288,8 +288,7 @@ bool bch2_compact_whiteouts(struct bch_fs *c, struct btree *b,
|
||||
|
||||
static void btree_node_sort(struct bch_fs *c, struct btree *b,
|
||||
unsigned start_idx,
|
||||
unsigned end_idx,
|
||||
bool filter_whiteouts)
|
||||
unsigned end_idx)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct btree_node *out;
|
||||
struct sort_iter_stack sort_iter;
|
||||
@ -320,7 +319,7 @@ static void btree_node_sort(struct bch_fs *c, struct btree *b,
|
||||
|
||||
start_time = local_clock();
|
||||
|
||||
u64s = bch2_sort_keys(out->keys.start, &sort_iter.iter, filter_whiteouts);
|
||||
u64s = bch2_sort_keys(out->keys.start, &sort_iter.iter);
|
||||
|
||||
out->keys.u64s = cpu_to_le16(u64s);
|
||||
|
||||
@ -426,13 +425,12 @@ static bool btree_node_compact(struct bch_fs *c, struct btree *b)
|
||||
break;
|
||||
|
||||
if (b->nsets - unwritten_idx > 1) {
|
||||
btree_node_sort(c, b, unwritten_idx,
|
||||
b->nsets, false);
|
||||
btree_node_sort(c, b, unwritten_idx, b->nsets);
|
||||
ret = true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (unwritten_idx > 1) {
|
||||
btree_node_sort(c, b, 0, unwritten_idx, false);
|
||||
btree_node_sort(c, b, 0, unwritten_idx);
|
||||
ret = true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@ -2095,11 +2093,11 @@ void __bch2_btree_node_write(struct bch_fs *c, struct btree *b, unsigned flags)
|
||||
unwritten_whiteouts_end(b));
|
||||
SET_BSET_SEPARATE_WHITEOUTS(i, false);
|
||||
|
||||
b->whiteout_u64s = 0;
|
||||
|
||||
u64s = bch2_sort_keys(i->start, &sort_iter.iter, false);
|
||||
u64s = bch2_sort_keys_keep_unwritten_whiteouts(i->start, &sort_iter.iter);
|
||||
le16_add_cpu(&i->u64s, u64s);
|
||||
|
||||
b->whiteout_u64s = 0;
|
||||
|
||||
BUG_ON(!b->written && i->u64s != b->data->keys.u64s);
|
||||
|
||||
set_needs_whiteout(i, false);
|
||||
@ -2249,7 +2247,7 @@ bool bch2_btree_post_write_cleanup(struct bch_fs *c, struct btree *b)
|
||||
* single bset:
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (b->nsets > 1) {
|
||||
btree_node_sort(c, b, 0, b->nsets, true);
|
||||
btree_node_sort(c, b, 0, b->nsets);
|
||||
invalidated_iter = true;
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
invalidated_iter = bch2_drop_whiteouts(b, COMPACT_ALL);
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user