ACPI: EC: Fix acpi_ec_dispatch_gpe()

Commit 896e97bf99 ("ACPI: EC: Clear GPE on interrupt handling only")
broke suspend-to-idle at least on Dell XPS13 9360 and 9380.

The problem is that acpi_ec_dispatch_gpe() must clear the EC GPE,
because the EC GPE handler never runs when the system is in the
suspend-to-idle state and if the EC GPE is not cleared by the suspend-
to-idle loop, it is never cleared at all which leads to a GPE storm.
This causes suspend-to-idle to burn energy instead of saving it which
is potentially dangerous (the affected machines heat up rather badly
when that happens).

Addess this by making acpi_ec_dispatch_gpe() clear the EC GPE as it did
before.

Fixes: 896e97bf99 ("ACPI: EC: Clear GPE on interrupt handling only")
Tested-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
This commit is contained in:
Rafael J. Wysocki 2023-06-27 16:35:52 +02:00
parent bb6950556d
commit b5539eb5ee

View File

@ -1267,12 +1267,8 @@ static void acpi_ec_event_handler(struct work_struct *work)
spin_unlock_irq(&ec->lock);
}
static void acpi_ec_handle_interrupt(struct acpi_ec *ec)
static void clear_gpe_and_advance_transaction(struct acpi_ec *ec, bool interrupt)
{
unsigned long flags;
spin_lock_irqsave(&ec->lock, flags);
/*
* Clear GPE_STS upfront to allow subsequent hardware GPE_STS 0->1
* changes to always trigger a GPE interrupt.
@ -1289,6 +1285,16 @@ static void acpi_ec_handle_interrupt(struct acpi_ec *ec)
acpi_clear_gpe(NULL, ec->gpe);
advance_transaction(ec, true);
}
static void acpi_ec_handle_interrupt(struct acpi_ec *ec)
{
unsigned long flags;
spin_lock_irqsave(&ec->lock, flags);
clear_gpe_and_advance_transaction(ec, true);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ec->lock, flags);
}
@ -2083,7 +2089,7 @@ bool acpi_ec_dispatch_gpe(void)
if (acpi_ec_gpe_status_set(first_ec)) {
pm_pr_dbg("ACPI EC GPE status set\n");
advance_transaction(first_ec, false);
clear_gpe_and_advance_transaction(first_ec, false);
work_in_progress = acpi_ec_work_in_progress(first_ec);
}