Kernel/linux-next
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git synced 2024-12-29 09:12:07 +00:00
Code Issues Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

block: t10-pi: fix -Wswitch warning

Browse Source 
Changing the switch() statement to symbolic constants made the compiler
(at least clang-9, did not check gcc) notice that there is one enum value
that is not handled here:

block/t10-pi.c:62:11: error: enumeration value 'T10_PI_TYPE0_PROTECTION'
not handled in switch [-Werror,-Wswitch]

Add a BUG_ON statement if we ever get to t10_pi_verify function with
TYPE0 and replace the switch() statement with if/else clause for the
valid types.

Fixes: 9b2061b1a262 ("block: use symbolic constants for t10_pi type")
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Signed-off-by: Max Gurtovoy <maxg@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
This commit is contained in:
Max Gurtovoy 2019-09-22 12:46:55 +03:00 committed by Jens Axboe
parent eb09b3cc46
commit be21683e48
1 changed files with 5 additions and 6 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

11
block/t10-pi.c
View File

@ -55,13 +55,14 @@ static blk_status_t t10_pi_verify(struct blk_integrity_iter *iter,
{
unsigned int i;
BUG_ON(type == T10_PI_TYPE0_PROTECTION);
for (i = 0 ; i < iter->data_size ; i += iter->interval) {
struct t10_pi_tuple *pi = iter->prot_buf;
__be16 csum;
switch (type) {
case T10_PI_TYPE1_PROTECTION:
case T10_PI_TYPE2_PROTECTION:
if (type == T10_PI_TYPE1_PROTECTION ||
type == T10_PI_TYPE2_PROTECTION) {
if (pi->app_tag == T10_PI_APP_ESCAPE)
goto next;
@ -73,12 +74,10 @@ static blk_status_t t10_pi_verify(struct blk_integrity_iter *iter,
iter->seed, be32_to_cpu(pi->ref_tag));
return BLK_STS_PROTECTION;
}
break;
case T10_PI_TYPE3_PROTECTION:
} else if (type == T10_PI_TYPE3_PROTECTION) {
if (pi->app_tag == T10_PI_APP_ESCAPE &&
pi->ref_tag == T10_PI_REF_ESCAPE)
goto next;
break;
}
csum = fn(iter->data_buf, iter->interval);