From edc0a2b5957652f4685ef3516f519f84807087db Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Zhang Rui Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2023 09:56:40 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] x86/topology: Fix erroneous smp_num_siblings on Intel Hybrid platforms Traditionally, all CPUs in a system have identical numbers of SMT siblings. That changes with hybrid processors where some logical CPUs have a sibling and others have none. Today, the CPU boot code sets the global variable smp_num_siblings when every CPU thread is brought up. The last thread to boot will overwrite it with the number of siblings of *that* thread. That last thread to boot will "win". If the thread is a Pcore, smp_num_siblings == 2. If it is an Ecore, smp_num_siblings == 1. smp_num_siblings describes if the *system* supports SMT. It should specify the maximum number of SMT threads among all cores. Ensure that smp_num_siblings represents the system-wide maximum number of siblings by always increasing its value. Never allow it to decrease. On MeteorLake-P platform, this fixes a problem that the Ecore CPUs are not updated in any cpu sibling map because the system is treated as an UP system when probing Ecore CPUs. Below shows part of the CPU topology information before and after the fix, for both Pcore and Ecore CPU (cpu0 is Pcore, cpu 12 is Ecore). ... -/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/topology/package_cpus:000fff -/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/topology/package_cpus_list:0-11 +/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/topology/package_cpus:3fffff +/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/topology/package_cpus_list:0-21 ... -/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu12/topology/package_cpus:001000 -/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu12/topology/package_cpus_list:12 +/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu12/topology/package_cpus:3fffff +/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu12/topology/package_cpus_list:0-21 Notice that the "before" 'package_cpus_list' has only one CPU. This means that userspace tools like lscpu will see a little laptop like an 11-socket system: -Core(s) per socket: 1 -Socket(s): 11 +Core(s) per socket: 16 +Socket(s): 1 This is also expected to make the scheduler do rather wonky things too. [ dhansen: remove CPUID detail from changelog, add end user effects ] CC: stable@kernel.org Fixes: bbb65d2d365e ("x86: use cpuid vector 0xb when available for detecting cpu topology") Fixes: 95f3d39ccf7a ("x86/cpu/topology: Provide detect_extended_topology_early()") Suggested-by: Len Brown Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230323015640.27906-1-rui.zhang%40intel.com --- arch/x86/kernel/cpu/topology.c | 5 +++-- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/topology.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/topology.c index 5e868b62a7c4..0270925fe013 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/topology.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/topology.c @@ -79,7 +79,7 @@ int detect_extended_topology_early(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c) * initial apic id, which also represents 32-bit extended x2apic id. */ c->initial_apicid = edx; - smp_num_siblings = LEVEL_MAX_SIBLINGS(ebx); + smp_num_siblings = max_t(int, smp_num_siblings, LEVEL_MAX_SIBLINGS(ebx)); #endif return 0; } @@ -109,7 +109,8 @@ int detect_extended_topology(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c) */ cpuid_count(leaf, SMT_LEVEL, &eax, &ebx, &ecx, &edx); c->initial_apicid = edx; - core_level_siblings = smp_num_siblings = LEVEL_MAX_SIBLINGS(ebx); + core_level_siblings = LEVEL_MAX_SIBLINGS(ebx); + smp_num_siblings = max_t(int, smp_num_siblings, LEVEL_MAX_SIBLINGS(ebx)); core_plus_mask_width = ht_mask_width = BITS_SHIFT_NEXT_LEVEL(eax); die_level_siblings = LEVEL_MAX_SIBLINGS(ebx); pkg_mask_width = die_plus_mask_width = BITS_SHIFT_NEXT_LEVEL(eax);