Commit Graph

3310 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Yonghong Song
5b95e638f1 bpf: Refill only one percpu element in memalloc
Typically for percpu map element or data structure, once allocated,
most operations are lookup or in-place update. Deletion are really
rare. Currently, for percpu data strcture, 4 elements will be
refilled if the size is <= 256. Let us just do with one element
for percpu data. For example, for size 256 and 128 cpus, the
potential saving will be 3 * 256 * 128 * 128 = 12MB.

Acked-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231222031750.1289290-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2024-01-03 21:08:25 -08:00
Yonghong Song
c39aa3b289 bpf: Allow per unit prefill for non-fix-size percpu memory allocator
Commit 41a5db8d81 ("Add support for non-fix-size percpu mem allocation")
added support for non-fix-size percpu memory allocation.
Such allocation will allocate percpu memory for all buckets on all
cpus and the memory consumption is in the order to quadratic.
For example, let us say, 4 cpus, unit size 16 bytes, so each
cpu has 16 * 4 = 64 bytes, with 4 cpus, total will be 64 * 4 = 256 bytes.
Then let us say, 8 cpus with the same unit size, each cpu
has 16 * 8 = 128 bytes, with 8 cpus, total will be 128 * 8 = 1024 bytes.
So if the number of cpus doubles, the number of memory consumption
will be 4 times. So for a system with large number of cpus, the
memory consumption goes up quickly with quadratic order.
For example, for 4KB percpu allocation, 128 cpus. The total memory
consumption will 4KB * 128 * 128 = 64MB. Things will become
worse if the number of cpus is bigger (e.g., 512, 1024, etc.)

In Commit 41a5db8d81, the non-fix-size percpu memory allocation is
done in boot time, so for system with large number of cpus, the initial
percpu memory consumption is very visible. For example, for 128 cpu
system, the total percpu memory allocation will be at least
(16 + 32 + 64 + 96 + 128 + 196 + 256 + 512 + 1024 + 2048 + 4096)
  * 128 * 128 = ~138MB.
which is pretty big. It will be even bigger for larger number of cpus.

Note that the current prefill also allocates 4 entries if the unit size
is less than 256. So on top of 138MB memory consumption, this will
add more consumption with
3 * (16 + 32 + 64 + 96 + 128 + 196 + 256) * 128 * 128 = ~38MB.
Next patch will try to reduce this memory consumption.

Later on, Commit 1fda5bb66a ("bpf: Do not allocate percpu memory
at init stage") moved the non-fix-size percpu memory allocation
to bpf verificaiton stage. Once a particular bpf_percpu_obj_new()
is called by bpf program, the memory allocator will try to fill in
the cache with all sizes, causing the same amount of percpu memory
consumption as in the boot stage.

To reduce the initial percpu memory consumption for non-fix-size
percpu memory allocation, instead of filling the cache with all
supported allocation sizes, this patch intends to fill the cache
only for the requested size. As typically users will not use large
percpu data structure, this can save memory significantly.
For example, the allocation size is 64 bytes with 128 cpus.
Then total percpu memory amount will be 64 * 128 * 128 = 1MB,
much less than previous 138MB.

Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
Acked-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231222031745.1289082-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2024-01-03 21:08:25 -08:00
Yonghong Song
9fc8e80204 bpf: Add objcg to bpf_mem_alloc
The objcg is a bpf_mem_alloc level property since all bpf_mem_cache's
are with the same objcg. This patch made such a property explicit.
The next patch will use this property to save and restore objcg
for percpu unit allocator.

Acked-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231222031739.1288590-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2024-01-03 21:08:25 -08:00
Yonghong Song
9beda16c25 bpf: Avoid unnecessary extra percpu memory allocation
Currently, for percpu memory allocation, say if the user
requests allocation size to be 32 bytes, the actually
calculated size will be 40 bytes and it further rounds
to 64 bytes, and eventually 64 bytes are allocated,
wasting 32-byte memory.

Change bpf_mem_alloc() to calculate the cache index
based on the user-provided allocation size so unnecessary
extra memory can be avoided.

Suggested-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
Acked-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231222031734.1288400-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2024-01-03 21:08:25 -08:00
Andrei Matei
8a021e7fa1 bpf: Simplify checking size of helper accesses
This patch simplifies the verification of size arguments associated to
pointer arguments to helpers and kfuncs. Many helpers take a pointer
argument followed by the size of the memory access performed to be
performed through that pointer. Before this patch, the handling of the
size argument in check_mem_size_reg() was confusing and wasteful: if the
size register's lower bound was 0, then the verification was done twice:
once considering the size of the access to be the lower-bound of the
respective argument, and once considering the upper bound (even if the
two are the same). The upper bound checking is a super-set of the
lower-bound checking(*), except: the only point of the lower-bound check
is to handle the case where zero-sized-accesses are explicitly not
allowed and the lower-bound is zero. This static condition is now
checked explicitly, replacing a much more complex, expensive and
confusing verification call to check_helper_mem_access().

Error messages change in this patch. Before, messages about illegal
zero-size accesses depended on the type of the pointer and on other
conditions, and sometimes the message was plain wrong: in some tests
that changed you'll see that the old message was something like "R1 min
value is outside of the allowed memory range", where R1 is the pointer
register; the error was wrongly claiming that the pointer was bad
instead of the size being bad. Other times the information that the size
came for a register with a possible range of values was wrong, and the
error presented the size as a fixed zero. Now the errors refer to the
right register. However, the old error messages did contain useful
information about the pointer register which is now lost; recovering
this information was deemed not important enough.

(*) Besides standing to reason that the checks for a bigger size access
are a super-set of the checks for a smaller size access, I have also
mechanically verified this by reading the code for all types of
pointers. I could convince myself that it's true for all but
PTR_TO_BTF_ID (check_ptr_to_btf_access). There, simply looking
line-by-line does not immediately prove what we want. If anyone has any
qualms, let me know.

Signed-off-by: Andrei Matei <andreimatei1@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20231221232225.568730-2-andreimatei1@gmail.com
2024-01-03 10:37:56 -08:00
Kent Overstreet
1e2f2d3199 Kill sched.h dependency on rcupdate.h
by moving cond_resched_rcu() to rcupdate_wait.h, we can kill another big
sched.h dependency.

Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
2023-12-27 11:50:20 -05:00
Simon Horman
5abde62465 bpf: Avoid unnecessary use of comma operator in verifier
Although it does not seem to have any untoward side-effects, the use
of ';' to separate to assignments seems more appropriate than ','.

Flagged by clang-17 -Wcomma

No functional change intended. Compile tested only.

Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Reviewed-by: Dave Marchevsky <davemarchevsky@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20231221-bpf-verifier-comma-v1-1-cde2530912e9@kernel.org
2023-12-21 22:40:25 +01:00
Daniel Borkmann
b08c8fc041 bpf: Re-support uid and gid when mounting bpffs
For a clean, conflict-free revert of the token-related patches in commit
d17aff807f ("Revert BPF token-related functionality"), the bpf fs commit
750e785796 ("bpf: Support uid and gid when mounting bpffs") was undone
temporarily as well.

This patch manually re-adds the functionality from the original one back
in 750e785796, no other functional changes intended.

Testing:

  # mount -t bpf -o uid=65534,gid=65534 bpffs ./foo
  # ls -la . | grep foo
  drwxrwxrwt   2 nobody nogroup          0 Dec 20 13:16 foo
  # mount -t bpf
  bpffs on /root/foo type bpf (rw,relatime,uid=65534,gid=65534)

Also, passing invalid arguments for uid/gid are properly rejected as expected.

Fixes: d17aff807f ("Revert BPF token-related functionality")
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Reviewed-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
Cc: Jie Jiang <jiejiang@chromium.org>
Cc: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20231220133805.20953-1-daniel@iogearbox.net
2023-12-21 14:24:30 +01:00
Hou Tao
7ac5c53e00 bpf: Use c->unit_size to select target cache during free
At present, bpf memory allocator uses check_obj_size() to ensure that
ksize() of allocated pointer is equal with the unit_size of used
bpf_mem_cache. Its purpose is to prevent bpf_mem_free() from selecting
a bpf_mem_cache which has different unit_size compared with the
bpf_mem_cache used for allocation. But as reported by lkp, the return
value of ksize() or kmalloc_size_roundup() may change due to slab merge
and it will lead to the warning report in check_obj_size().

The reported warning happened as follows:
(1) in bpf_mem_cache_adjust_size(), kmalloc_size_roundup(96) returns the
object_size of kmalloc-96 instead of kmalloc-cg-96. The object_size of
kmalloc-96 is 96, so size_index for 96 is not adjusted accordingly.
(2) the object_size of kmalloc-cg-96 is adjust from 96 to 128 due to
slab merge in __kmem_cache_alias(). For SLAB, SLAB_HWCACHE_ALIGN is
enabled by default for kmalloc slab, so align is 64 and size is 128 for
kmalloc-cg-96. SLUB has a similar merge logic, but its object_size will
not be changed, because its align is 8 under x86-64.
(3) when unit_alloc() does kmalloc_node(96, __GFP_ACCOUNT, node),
ksize() returns 128 instead of 96 for the returned pointer.
(4) the warning in check_obj_size() is triggered.

Considering the slab merge can happen in anytime (e.g, a slab created in
a new module), the following case is also possible: during the
initialization of bpf_global_ma, there is no slab merge and ksize() for
a 96-bytes object returns 96. But after that a new slab created by a
kernel module is merged to kmalloc-cg-96 and the object_size of
kmalloc-cg-96 is adjust from 96 to 128 (which is possible for x86-64 +
CONFIG_SLAB, because its alignment requirement is 64 for 96-bytes slab).
So soon or later, when bpf_global_ma frees a 96-byte-sized pointer
which is allocated from bpf_mem_cache with unit_size=96, bpf_mem_free()
will free the pointer through a bpf_mem_cache in which unit_size is 128,
because the return value of ksize() changes. The warning for the
mismatch will be triggered again.

A feasible fix is introducing similar APIs compared with ksize() and
kmalloc_size_roundup() to return the actually-allocated size instead of
size which may change due to slab merge, but it will introduce
unnecessary dependency on the implementation details of mm subsystem.

As for now the pointer of bpf_mem_cache is saved in the 8-bytes area
(or 4-bytes under 32-bit host) above the returned pointer, using
unit_size in the saved bpf_mem_cache to select the target cache instead
of inferring the size from the pointer itself. Beside no extra
dependency on mm subsystem, the performance for bpf_mem_free_rcu() is
also improved as shown below.

Before applying the patch, the performances of bpf_mem_alloc() and
bpf_mem_free_rcu() on 8-CPUs VM with one producer are as follows:

kmalloc : alloc 11.69 ± 0.28M/s free 29.58 ± 0.93M/s
percpu  : alloc 14.11 ± 0.52M/s free 14.29 ± 0.99M/s

After apply the patch, the performance for bpf_mem_free_rcu() increases
9% and 146% for kmalloc memory and per-cpu memory respectively:

kmalloc: alloc 11.01 ± 0.03M/s free   32.42 ± 0.48M/s
percpu:  alloc 12.84 ± 0.12M/s free   35.24 ± 0.23M/s

After the fixes, there is no need to adjust size_index to fix the
mismatch between allocation and free, so remove it as well. Also return
NULL instead of ZERO_SIZE_PTR for zero-sized alloc in bpf_mem_alloc(),
because there is no bpf_mem_cache pointer saved above ZERO_SIZE_PTR.

Fixes: 9077fc228f ("bpf: Use kmalloc_size_roundup() to adjust size_index")
Reported-by: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/202310302113.9f8fe705-oliver.sang@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231216131052.27621-2-houtao@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2023-12-20 13:25:46 -08:00
Andrii Nakryiko
a64bfe6186 bpf: add support for passing dynptr pointer to global subprog
Add ability to pass a pointer to dynptr into global functions.
This allows to have global subprogs that accept and work with generic
dynptrs that are created by caller. Dynptr argument is detected based on
the name of a struct type, if it's "bpf_dynptr", it's assumed to be
a proper dynptr pointer. Both actual struct and forward struct
declaration types are supported.

This is conceptually exactly the same semantics as
bpf_user_ringbuf_drain()'s use of dynptr to pass a variable-sized
pointer to ringbuf record. So we heavily rely on CONST_PTR_TO_DYNPTR
bits of already existing logic in the verifier.

During global subprog validation, we mark such CONST_PTR_TO_DYNPTR as
having LOCAL type, as that's the most unassuming type of dynptr and it
doesn't have any special helpers that can try to free or acquire extra
references (unlike skb, xdp, or ringbuf dynptr). So that seems like a safe
"choice" to make from correctness standpoint. It's still possible to
pass any type of dynptr to such subprog, though, because generic dynptr
helpers, like getting data/slice pointers, read/write memory copying
routines, dynptr adjustment and getter routines all work correctly with
any type of dynptr.

Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231215011334.2307144-8-andrii@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2023-12-19 18:06:46 -08:00
Andrii Nakryiko
94e1c70a34 bpf: support 'arg:xxx' btf_decl_tag-based hints for global subprog args
Add support for annotating global BPF subprog arguments to provide more
information about expected semantics of the argument. Currently,
verifier relies purely on argument's BTF type information, and supports
three general use cases: scalar, pointer-to-context, and
pointer-to-fixed-size-memory.

Scalar and pointer-to-fixed-mem work well in practice and are quite
natural to use. But pointer-to-context is a bit problematic, as typical
BPF users don't realize that they need to use a special type name to
signal to verifier that argument is not just some pointer, but actually
a PTR_TO_CTX. Further, even if users do know which type to use, it is
limiting in situations where the same BPF program logic is used across
few different program types. Common case is kprobes, tracepoints, and
perf_event programs having a helper to send some data over BPF perf
buffer. bpf_perf_event_output() requires `ctx` argument, and so it's
quite cumbersome to share such global subprog across few BPF programs of
different types, necessitating extra static subprog that is context
type-agnostic.

Long story short, there is a need to go beyond types and allow users to
add hints to global subprog arguments to define expectations.

This patch adds such support for two initial special tags:
  - pointer to context;
  - non-null qualifier for generic pointer arguments.

All of the above came up in practice already and seem generally useful
additions. Non-null qualifier is an often requested feature, which
currently has to be worked around by having unnecessary NULL checks
inside subprogs even if we know that arguments are never NULL. Pointer
to context was discussed earlier.

As for implementation, we utilize btf_decl_tag attribute and set up an
"arg:xxx" convention to specify argument hint. As such:
  - btf_decl_tag("arg:ctx") is a PTR_TO_CTX hint;
  - btf_decl_tag("arg:nonnull") marks pointer argument as not allowed to
    be NULL, making NULL check inside global subprog unnecessary.

Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231215011334.2307144-7-andrii@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2023-12-19 18:06:46 -08:00
Andrii Nakryiko
f18c3d88de bpf: reuse subprog argument parsing logic for subprog call checks
Remove duplicated BTF parsing logic when it comes to subprog call check.
Instead, use (potentially cached) results of btf_prepare_func_args() to
abstract away expectations of each subprog argument in generic terms
(e.g., "this is pointer to context", or "this is a pointer to memory of
size X"), and then use those simple high-level argument type
expectations to validate actual register states to check if they match
expectations.

Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231215011334.2307144-6-andrii@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2023-12-19 18:06:46 -08:00
Andrii Nakryiko
c5a7244759 bpf: move subprog call logic back to verifier.c
Subprog call logic in btf_check_subprog_call() currently has both a lot
of BTF parsing logic (which is, presumably, what justified putting it
into btf.c), but also a bunch of register state checks, some of each
utilize deep verifier logic helpers, necessarily exported from
verifier.c: check_ptr_off_reg(), check_func_arg_reg_off(),
and check_mem_reg().

Going forward, btf_check_subprog_call() will have a minimum of
BTF-related logic, but will get more internal verifier logic related to
register state manipulation. So move it into verifier.c to minimize
amount of verifier-specific logic exposed to btf.c.

We do this move before refactoring btf_check_func_arg_match() to
preserve as much history post-refactoring as possible.

No functional changes.

Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231215011334.2307144-5-andrii@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2023-12-19 18:06:46 -08:00
Andrii Nakryiko
e26080d0da bpf: prepare btf_prepare_func_args() for handling static subprogs
Generalize btf_prepare_func_args() to support both global and static
subprogs. We are going to utilize this property in the next patch,
reusing btf_prepare_func_args() for subprog call logic instead of
reparsing BTF information in a completely separate implementation.

btf_prepare_func_args() now detects whether subprog is global or static
makes slight logic adjustments for static func cases, like not failing
fatally (-EFAULT) for conditions that are allowable for static subprogs.

Somewhat subtle (but major!) difference is the handling of pointer arguments.
Both global and static functions need to handle special context
arguments (which are pointers to predefined type names), but static
subprogs give up on any other pointers, falling back to marking subprog
as "unreliable", disabling the use of BTF type information altogether.

For global functions, though, we are assuming that such pointers to
unrecognized types are just pointers to fixed-sized memory region (or
error out if size cannot be established, like for `void *` pointers).

This patch accommodates these small differences and sets up a stage for
refactoring in the next patch, eliminating a separate BTF-based parsing
logic in btf_check_func_arg_match().

Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231215011334.2307144-4-andrii@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2023-12-19 18:06:46 -08:00
Andrii Nakryiko
5eccd2db42 bpf: reuse btf_prepare_func_args() check for main program BTF validation
Instead of btf_check_subprog_arg_match(), use btf_prepare_func_args()
logic to validate "trustworthiness" of main BPF program's BTF information,
if it is present.

We ignored results of original BTF check anyway, often times producing
confusing and ominously-sounding "reg type unsupported for arg#0
function" message, which has no apparent effect on program correctness
and verification process.

All the -EFAULT returning sanity checks are already performed in
check_btf_info_early(), so there is zero reason to have this duplication
of logic between btf_check_subprog_call() and btf_check_subprog_arg_match().
Dropping btf_check_subprog_arg_match() simplifies
btf_check_func_arg_match() further removing `bool processing_call` flag.

One subtle bit that was done by btf_check_subprog_arg_match() was
potentially marking main program's BTF as unreliable. We do this
explicitly now with a dedicated simple check, preserving the original
behavior, but now based on well factored btf_prepare_func_args() logic.

Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231215011334.2307144-3-andrii@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2023-12-19 18:06:46 -08:00
Andrii Nakryiko
4ba1d0f234 bpf: abstract away global subprog arg preparation logic from reg state setup
btf_prepare_func_args() is used to understand expectations and
restrictions on global subprog arguments. But current implementation is
hard to extend, as it intermixes BTF-based func prototype parsing and
interpretation logic with setting up register state at subprog entry.

Worse still, those registers are not completely set up inside
btf_prepare_func_args(), requiring some more logic later in
do_check_common(). Like calling mark_reg_unknown() and similar
initialization operations.

This intermixing of BTF interpretation and register state setup is
problematic. First, it causes duplication of BTF parsing logic for global
subprog verification (to set up initial state of global subprog) and
global subprog call sites analysis (when we need to check that whatever
is being passed into global subprog matches expectations), performed in
btf_check_subprog_call().

Given we want to extend global func argument with tags later, this
duplication is problematic. So refactor btf_prepare_func_args() to do
only BTF-based func proto and args parsing, returning high-level
argument "expectations" only, with no regard to specifics of register
state. I.e., if it's a context argument, instead of setting register
state to PTR_TO_CTX, we return ARG_PTR_TO_CTX enum for that argument as
"an argument specification" for further processing inside
do_check_common(). Similarly for SCALAR arguments, PTR_TO_MEM, etc.

This allows to reuse btf_prepare_func_args() in following patches at
global subprog call site analysis time. It also keeps register setup
code consistently in one place, do_check_common().

Besides all this, we cache this argument specs information inside
env->subprog_info, eliminating the need to redo these potentially
expensive BTF traversals, especially if BPF program's BTF is big and/or
there are lots of global subprog calls.

Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231215011334.2307144-2-andrii@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2023-12-19 18:06:46 -08:00
Menglong Dong
d028f87517 bpf: make the verifier tracks the "not equal" for regs
We can derive some new information for BPF_JNE in regs_refine_cond_op().
Take following code for example:

  /* The type of "a" is u32 */
  if (a > 0 && a < 100) {
    /* the range of the register for a is [0, 99], not [1, 99],
     * and will cause the following error:
     *
     *   invalid zero-sized read
     *
     * as a can be 0.
     */
    bpf_skb_store_bytes(skb, xx, xx, a, 0);
  }

In the code above, "a > 0" will be compiled to "jmp xxx if a == 0". In the
TRUE branch, the dst_reg will be marked as known to 0. However, in the
fallthrough(FALSE) branch, the dst_reg will not be handled, which makes
the [min, max] for a is [0, 99], not [1, 99].

For BPF_JNE, we can reduce the range of the dst reg if the src reg is a
const and is exactly the edge of the dst reg.

Signed-off-by: Menglong Dong <menglong8.dong@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Shung-Hsi Yu <shung-hsi.yu@suse.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231219134800.1550388-2-menglong8.dong@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2023-12-19 17:18:55 -08:00
Andrii Nakryiko
d17aff807f Revert BPF token-related functionality
This patch includes the following revert (one  conflicting BPF FS
patch and three token patch sets, represented by merge commits):
  - revert 0f5d5454c7 "Merge branch 'bpf-fs-mount-options-parsing-follow-ups'";
  - revert 750e785796 "bpf: Support uid and gid when mounting bpffs";
  - revert 733763285a "Merge branch 'bpf-token-support-in-libbpf-s-bpf-object'";
  - revert c35919dcce "Merge branch 'bpf-token-and-bpf-fs-based-delegation'".

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/CAHk-=wg7JuFYwGy=GOMbRCtOL+jwSQsdUaBsRWkDVYbxipbM5A@mail.gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
2023-12-19 08:23:03 -08:00
Jakub Kicinski
c49b292d03 netdev
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
 
 iQIzBAABCAAdFiEE+soXsSLHKoYyzcli6rmadz2vbToFAmWAz2EACgkQ6rmadz2v
 bToqrw/9EwroZCc8GEHOKAlb/fzrMvn92rLo0ZW/cGN84QJPnx4zM6Zo0+fgLaaN
 oqqztwMUwdzGC3uX3FfVXaaLKbJ/MeHeL9BXFZNW8zkRHciw4R7kIBhOdPnHyET7
 uT+rQ4xPe1Mt7e9PjepKlSL5mEsxWfBkdUgsdn19Z2Vjdfr9mZMhYWYMJGcfTCD1
 TwxHKBPhq5fN3IsshmMBB8IrRp1HStUKb65MgZ4dI22LJXxTsFkx5XMFXcmuqvkH
 NhKj8jDcPEEh31bYcb6aG2Z4onw5F2lquygjk1Qyy5cyw45m/ipJKAXKdAyvJG+R
 VZCWOET/9wbRwFSK5wxwihCuKghFiofK52i2PcGtXZh0PCouyZZneSJOKM0yVWKO
 BvuJBxK4ETRnQyN6ZxhuJiEXG3/YMBBhyR2TX1LntVK9ct/k7qFVzATG49J39/sR
 SYMbptBRj4a5oMJ1qn0nFVEDFkg0jTnTDNnsEpcz60Ayt6EsJ1XosO5yz2huf861
 xgRMTKMseyG1/uV45tQ8ZPzbSPpBxjUi9Dl3coYsIm1a+y6clWUXcarONY5KVrpS
 CR98DuFgl+E7dXuisd/Kz2p2KxxSPq8nytsmLlgOvrUqhwiXqB+TKN8EHgIapVOt
 l1A5LrzXFTcGlT9MlaWBqEIy83Bu1nqQqbxrAFOE0k8A5jomXaw=
 =stU2
 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Merge tag 'for-netdev' of https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next

Alexei Starovoitov says:

====================
pull-request: bpf-next 2023-12-18

This PR is larger than usual and contains changes in various parts
of the kernel.

The main changes are:

1) Fix kCFI bugs in BPF, from Peter Zijlstra.

End result: all forms of indirect calls from BPF into kernel
and from kernel into BPF work with CFI enabled. This allows BPF
to work with CONFIG_FINEIBT=y.

2) Introduce BPF token object, from Andrii Nakryiko.

It adds an ability to delegate a subset of BPF features from privileged
daemon (e.g., systemd) through special mount options for userns-bound
BPF FS to a trusted unprivileged application. The design accommodates
suggestions from Christian Brauner and Paul Moore.

Example:
$ sudo mkdir -p /sys/fs/bpf/token
$ sudo mount -t bpf bpffs /sys/fs/bpf/token \
             -o delegate_cmds=prog_load:MAP_CREATE \
             -o delegate_progs=kprobe \
             -o delegate_attachs=xdp

3) Various verifier improvements and fixes, from Andrii Nakryiko, Andrei Matei.

 - Complete precision tracking support for register spills
 - Fix verification of possibly-zero-sized stack accesses
 - Fix access to uninit stack slots
 - Track aligned STACK_ZERO cases as imprecise spilled registers.
   It improves the verifier "instructions processed" metric from single
   digit to 50-60% for some programs.
 - Fix verifier retval logic

4) Support for VLAN tag in XDP hints, from Larysa Zaremba.

5) Allocate BPF trampoline via bpf_prog_pack mechanism, from Song Liu.

End result: better memory utilization and lower I$ miss for calls to BPF
via BPF trampoline.

6) Fix race between BPF prog accessing inner map and parallel delete,
from Hou Tao.

7) Add bpf_xdp_get_xfrm_state() kfunc, from Daniel Xu.

It allows BPF interact with IPSEC infra. The intent is to support
software RSS (via XDP) for the upcoming ipsec pcpu work.
Experiments on AWS demonstrate single tunnel pcpu ipsec reaching
line rate on 100G ENA nics.

8) Expand bpf_cgrp_storage to support cgroup1 non-attach, from Yafang Shao.

9) BPF file verification via fsverity, from Song Liu.

It allows BPF progs get fsverity digest.

* tag 'for-netdev' of https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next: (164 commits)
  bpf: Ensure precise is reset to false in __mark_reg_const_zero()
  selftests/bpf: Add more uprobe multi fail tests
  bpf: Fail uprobe multi link with negative offset
  selftests/bpf: Test the release of map btf
  s390/bpf: Fix indirect trampoline generation
  selftests/bpf: Temporarily disable dummy_struct_ops test on s390
  x86/cfi,bpf: Fix bpf_exception_cb() signature
  bpf: Fix dtor CFI
  cfi: Add CFI_NOSEAL()
  x86/cfi,bpf: Fix bpf_struct_ops CFI
  x86/cfi,bpf: Fix bpf_callback_t CFI
  x86/cfi,bpf: Fix BPF JIT call
  cfi: Flip headers
  selftests/bpf: Add test for abnormal cnt during multi-kprobe attachment
  selftests/bpf: Don't use libbpf_get_error() in kprobe_multi_test
  selftests/bpf: Add test for abnormal cnt during multi-uprobe attachment
  bpf: Limit the number of kprobes when attaching program to multiple kprobes
  bpf: Limit the number of uprobes when attaching program to multiple uprobes
  bpf: xdp: Register generic_kfunc_set with XDP programs
  selftests/bpf: utilize string values for delegate_xxx mount options
  ...
====================

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231219000520.34178-1-alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
2023-12-18 16:46:08 -08:00
Andrii Nakryiko
8e432e6197 bpf: Ensure precise is reset to false in __mark_reg_const_zero()
It is safe to always start with imprecise SCALAR_VALUE register.
Previously __mark_reg_const_zero() relied on caller to reset precise
mark, but it's very error prone and we already missed it in a few
places. So instead make __mark_reg_const_zero() reset precision always,
as it's a safe default for SCALAR_VALUE. Explanation is basically the
same as for why we are resetting (or rather not setting) precision in
current state. If necessary, precision propagation will set it to
precise correctly.

As such, also remove a big comment about forward precision propagation
in mark_reg_stack_read() and avoid unnecessarily setting precision to
true after reading from STACK_ZERO stack. Again, precision propagation
will correctly handle this, if that SCALAR_VALUE register will ever be
needed to be precise.

Reported-by: Maxim Mikityanskiy <maxtram95@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
Acked-by: Maxim Mikityanskiy <maxtram95@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20231218173601.53047-1-andrii@kernel.org
2023-12-18 23:54:21 +01:00
Alexei Starovoitov
852486b35f x86/cfi,bpf: Fix bpf_exception_cb() signature
As per the earlier patches, BPF sub-programs have bpf_callback_t
signature and CFI expects callers to have matching signature. This is
violated by bpf_prog_aux::bpf_exception_cb().

[peterz: Changelog]
Reported-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/CAADnVQ+Z7UcXXBBhMubhcMM=R-dExk-uHtfOLtoLxQ1XxEpqEA@mail.gmail.com
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231215092707.910319166@infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2023-12-15 16:25:55 -08:00
Peter Zijlstra
e4c0033989 bpf: Fix dtor CFI
Ensure the various dtor functions match their prototype and retain
their CFI signatures, since they don't have their address taken, they
are prone to not getting CFI, making them impossible to call
indirectly.

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231215092707.799451071@infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2023-12-15 16:25:55 -08:00
Peter Zijlstra
2cd3e3772e x86/cfi,bpf: Fix bpf_struct_ops CFI
BPF struct_ops uses __arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline() to write
trampolines for indirect function calls. These tramplines much have
matching CFI.

In order to obtain the correct CFI hash for the various methods, add a
matching structure that contains stub functions, the compiler will
generate correct CFI which we can pilfer for the trampolines.

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231215092707.566977112@infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2023-12-15 16:25:55 -08:00
Peter Zijlstra
4f9087f166 x86/cfi,bpf: Fix BPF JIT call
The current BPF call convention is __nocfi, except when it calls !JIT things,
then it calls regular C functions.

It so happens that with FineIBT the __nocfi and C calling conventions are
incompatible. Specifically __nocfi will call at func+0, while FineIBT will have
endbr-poison there, which is not a valid indirect target. Causing #CP.

Notably this only triggers on IBT enabled hardware, which is probably why this
hasn't been reported (also, most people will have JIT on anyway).

Implement proper CFI prologues for the BPF JIT codegen and drop __nocfi for
x86.

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231215092707.345270396@infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2023-12-15 16:25:55 -08:00
Daniel Xu
7489723c2e bpf: xdp: Register generic_kfunc_set with XDP programs
Registering generic_kfunc_set with XDP programs enables some of the
newer BPF features inside XDP -- namely tree based data structures and
BPF exceptions.

The current motivation for this commit is to enable assertions inside
XDP bpf progs. Assertions are a standard and useful tool to encode
intent.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Xu <dxu@dxuuu.xyz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/d07d4614b81ca6aada44fcb89bb6b618fb66e4ca.1702594357.git.dxu@dxuuu.xyz
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2023-12-14 19:12:16 -08:00
Andrii Nakryiko
c5707b2146 bpf: support symbolic BPF FS delegation mount options
Besides already supported special "any" value and hex bit mask, support
string-based parsing of delegation masks based on exact enumerator
names. Utilize BTF information of `enum bpf_cmd`, `enum bpf_map_type`,
`enum bpf_prog_type`, and `enum bpf_attach_type` types to find supported
symbolic names (ignoring __MAX_xxx guard values and stripping repetitive
prefixes like BPF_ for cmd and attach types, BPF_MAP_TYPE_ for maps, and
BPF_PROG_TYPE_ for prog types). The case doesn't matter, but it is
normalized to lower case in mount option output. So "PROG_LOAD",
"prog_load", and "MAP_create" are all valid values to specify for
delegate_cmds options, "array" is among supported for map types, etc.

Besides supporting string values, we also support multiple values
specified at the same time, using colon (':') separator.

There are corresponding changes on bpf_show_options side to use known
values to print them in human-readable format, falling back to hex mask
printing, if there are any unrecognized bits. This shouldn't be
necessary when enum BTF information is present, but in general we should
always be able to fall back to this even if kernel was built without BTF.
As mentioned, emitted symbolic names are normalized to be all lower case.

Example below shows various ways to specify delegate_cmds options
through mount command and how mount options are printed back:

12/14 14:39:07.604
vmuser@archvm:~/local/linux/tools/testing/selftests/bpf
$ mount | rg token

  $ sudo mkdir -p /sys/fs/bpf/token
  $ sudo mount -t bpf bpffs /sys/fs/bpf/token \
               -o delegate_cmds=prog_load:MAP_CREATE \
               -o delegate_progs=kprobe \
               -o delegate_attachs=xdp
  $ mount | grep token
  bpffs on /sys/fs/bpf/token type bpf (rw,relatime,delegate_cmds=map_create:prog_load,delegate_progs=kprobe,delegate_attachs=xdp)

Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231214225016.1209867-2-andrii@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2023-12-14 17:30:27 -08:00
Yonghong Song
59e5791f59 bpf: Fix a race condition between btf_put() and map_free()
When running `./test_progs -j` in my local vm with latest kernel,
I once hit a kasan error like below:

  [ 1887.184724] BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0
  [ 1887.185599] Read of size 4 at addr ffff888106806910 by task kworker/u12:2/2830
  [ 1887.186498]
  [ 1887.186712] CPU: 3 PID: 2830 Comm: kworker/u12:2 Tainted: G           OEL     6.7.0-rc3-00699-g90679706d486-dirty #494
  [ 1887.188034] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.14.0-0-g155821a1990b-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014
  [ 1887.189618] Workqueue: events_unbound bpf_map_free_deferred
  [ 1887.190341] Call Trace:
  [ 1887.190666]  <TASK>
  [ 1887.190949]  dump_stack_lvl+0xac/0xe0
  [ 1887.191423]  ? nf_tcp_handle_invalid+0x1b0/0x1b0
  [ 1887.192019]  ? panic+0x3c0/0x3c0
  [ 1887.192449]  print_report+0x14f/0x720
  [ 1887.192930]  ? preempt_count_sub+0x1c/0xd0
  [ 1887.193459]  ? __virt_addr_valid+0xac/0x120
  [ 1887.194004]  ? bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0
  [ 1887.194572]  kasan_report+0xc3/0x100
  [ 1887.195085]  ? bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0
  [ 1887.195668]  bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0
  [ 1887.196183]  ? __bpf_obj_drop_impl+0xb0/0xb0
  [ 1887.196736]  ? preempt_count_sub+0x1c/0xd0
  [ 1887.197270]  ? preempt_count_sub+0x1c/0xd0
  [ 1887.197802]  ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x1f/0x40
  [ 1887.198319]  bpf_obj_free_fields+0x1d4/0x260
  [ 1887.198883]  array_map_free+0x1a3/0x260
  [ 1887.199380]  bpf_map_free_deferred+0x7b/0xe0
  [ 1887.199943]  process_scheduled_works+0x3a2/0x6c0
  [ 1887.200549]  worker_thread+0x633/0x890
  [ 1887.201047]  ? __kthread_parkme+0xd7/0xf0
  [ 1887.201574]  ? kthread+0x102/0x1d0
  [ 1887.202020]  kthread+0x1ab/0x1d0
  [ 1887.202447]  ? pr_cont_work+0x270/0x270
  [ 1887.202954]  ? kthread_blkcg+0x50/0x50
  [ 1887.203444]  ret_from_fork+0x34/0x50
  [ 1887.203914]  ? kthread_blkcg+0x50/0x50
  [ 1887.204397]  ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20
  [ 1887.204913]  </TASK>
  [ 1887.204913]  </TASK>
  [ 1887.205209]
  [ 1887.205416] Allocated by task 2197:
  [ 1887.205881]  kasan_set_track+0x3f/0x60
  [ 1887.206366]  __kasan_kmalloc+0x6e/0x80
  [ 1887.206856]  __kmalloc+0xac/0x1a0
  [ 1887.207293]  btf_parse_fields+0xa15/0x1480
  [ 1887.207836]  btf_parse_struct_metas+0x566/0x670
  [ 1887.208387]  btf_new_fd+0x294/0x4d0
  [ 1887.208851]  __sys_bpf+0x4ba/0x600
  [ 1887.209292]  __x64_sys_bpf+0x41/0x50
  [ 1887.209762]  do_syscall_64+0x4c/0xf0
  [ 1887.210222]  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0x6b
  [ 1887.210868]
  [ 1887.211074] Freed by task 36:
  [ 1887.211460]  kasan_set_track+0x3f/0x60
  [ 1887.211951]  kasan_save_free_info+0x28/0x40
  [ 1887.212485]  ____kasan_slab_free+0x101/0x180
  [ 1887.213027]  __kmem_cache_free+0xe4/0x210
  [ 1887.213514]  btf_free+0x5b/0x130
  [ 1887.213918]  rcu_core+0x638/0xcc0
  [ 1887.214347]  __do_softirq+0x114/0x37e

The error happens at bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0:

  00000000000034c0 <bpf_rb_root_free>:
  ; {
    34c0: f3 0f 1e fa                   endbr64
    34c4: e8 00 00 00 00                callq   0x34c9 <bpf_rb_root_free+0x9>
    34c9: 55                            pushq   %rbp
    34ca: 48 89 e5                      movq    %rsp, %rbp
  ...
  ;       if (rec && rec->refcount_off >= 0 &&
    36aa: 4d 85 ed                      testq   %r13, %r13
    36ad: 74 a9                         je      0x3658 <bpf_rb_root_free+0x198>
    36af: 49 8d 7d 10                   leaq    0x10(%r13), %rdi
    36b3: e8 00 00 00 00                callq   0x36b8 <bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8>
                                        <==== kasan function
    36b8: 45 8b 7d 10                   movl    0x10(%r13), %r15d
                                        <==== use-after-free load
    36bc: 45 85 ff                      testl   %r15d, %r15d
    36bf: 78 8c                         js      0x364d <bpf_rb_root_free+0x18d>

So the problem is at rec->refcount_off in the above.

I did some source code analysis and find the reason.
                                  CPU A                        CPU B
  bpf_map_put:
    ...
    btf_put with rcu callback
    ...
    bpf_map_free_deferred
      with system_unbound_wq
    ...                          ...                           ...
    ...                          btf_free_rcu:                 ...
    ...                          ...                           bpf_map_free_deferred:
    ...                          ...
    ...         --------->       btf_struct_metas_free()
    ...         | race condition ...
    ...         --------->                                     map->ops->map_free()
    ...
    ...                          btf->struct_meta_tab = NULL

In the above, map_free() corresponds to array_map_free() and eventually
calling bpf_rb_root_free() which calls:
  ...
  __bpf_obj_drop_impl(obj, field->graph_root.value_rec, false);
  ...

Here, 'value_rec' is assigned in btf_check_and_fixup_fields() with following code:

  meta = btf_find_struct_meta(btf, btf_id);
  if (!meta)
    return -EFAULT;
  rec->fields[i].graph_root.value_rec = meta->record;

So basically, 'value_rec' is a pointer to the record in struct_metas_tab.
And it is possible that that particular record has been freed by
btf_struct_metas_free() and hence we have a kasan error here.

Actually it is very hard to reproduce the failure with current bpf/bpf-next
code, I only got the above error once. To increase reproducibility, I added
a delay in bpf_map_free_deferred() to delay map->ops->map_free(), which
significantly increased reproducibility.

  diff --git a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
  index 5e43ddd1b83f..aae5b5213e93 100644
  --- a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
  +++ b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
  @@ -695,6 +695,7 @@ static void bpf_map_free_deferred(struct work_struct *work)
        struct bpf_map *map = container_of(work, struct bpf_map, work);
        struct btf_record *rec = map->record;

  +     mdelay(100);
        security_bpf_map_free(map);
        bpf_map_release_memcg(map);
        /* implementation dependent freeing */

Hao also provided test cases ([1]) for easily reproducing the above issue.

There are two ways to fix the issue, the v1 of the patch ([2]) moving
btf_put() after map_free callback, and the v5 of the patch ([3]) using
a kptr style fix which tries to get a btf reference during
map_check_btf(). Each approach has its pro and cons. The first approach
delays freeing btf while the second approach needs to acquire reference
depending on context which makes logic not very elegant and may
complicate things with future new data structures. Alexei
suggested in [4] going back to v1 which is what this patch
tries to do.

Rerun './test_progs -j' with the above mdelay() hack for a couple
of times and didn't observe the error for the above rb_root test cases.
Running Hou's test ([1]) is also successful.

  [1] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20231207141500.917136-1-houtao@huaweicloud.com/
  [2] v1: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20231204173946.3066377-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev/
  [3] v5: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20231208041621.2968241-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev/
  [4] v4: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/CAADnVQJ3FiXUhZJwX_81sjZvSYYKCFB3BT6P8D59RS2Gu+0Z7g@mail.gmail.com/

Cc: Hou Tao <houtao@huaweicloud.com>
Fixes: 958cf2e273 ("bpf: Introduce bpf_obj_new")
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231214203815.1469107-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2023-12-14 17:10:32 -08:00
Hou Tao
dc68540913 bpf: Use GFP_KERNEL in bpf_event_entry_gen()
rcu_read_lock() is no longer held when invoking bpf_event_entry_gen()
which is called by perf_event_fd_array_get_ptr(), so using GFP_KERNEL
instead of GFP_ATOMIC to reduce the possibility of failures due to
out-of-memory.

Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231214043010.3458072-3-houtao@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2023-12-13 20:49:11 -08:00
Hou Tao
8f82583f95 bpf: Reduce the scope of rcu_read_lock when updating fd map
There is no rcu-read-lock requirement for ops->map_fd_get_ptr() or
ops->map_fd_put_ptr(), so doesn't use rcu-read-lock for these two
callbacks.

For bpf_fd_array_map_update_elem(), accessing array->ptrs doesn't need
rcu-read-lock because array->ptrs must still be allocated. For
bpf_fd_htab_map_update_elem(), htab_map_update_elem() only requires
rcu-read-lock to be held to avoid the WARN_ON_ONCE(), so only use
rcu_read_lock() during the invocation of htab_map_update_elem().

Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231214043010.3458072-2-houtao@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2023-12-13 20:49:11 -08:00
Hou Tao
2a0c6b41ee bpf: Update the comments in maybe_wait_bpf_programs()
Since commit 638e4b825d ("bpf: Allows per-cpu maps and map-in-map in
sleepable programs"), sleepable BPF program can also use map-in-map, but
maybe_wait_bpf_programs() doesn't handle it accordingly. The main reason
is that using synchronize_rcu_tasks_trace() to wait for the completions
of these sleepable BPF programs may incur a very long delay and
userspace may think it is hung, so the wait for sleepable BPF programs
is skipped. Update the comments in maybe_wait_bpf_programs() to reflect
the reason.

Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231211083447.1921178-1-houtao@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2023-12-13 17:01:42 -08:00
Matt Bobrowski
b13cddf633 bpf: add small subset of SECURITY_PATH hooks to BPF sleepable_lsm_hooks list
security_path_* based LSM hooks appear to be generally missing from
the sleepable_lsm_hooks list. Initially add a small subset of them to
the preexisting sleepable_lsm_hooks list so that sleepable BPF helpers
like bpf_d_path() can be used from sleepable BPF LSM based programs.

The security_path_* hooks added in this patch are similar to the
security_inode_* counterparts that already exist in the
sleepable_lsm_hooks list, and are called in roughly similar points and
contexts. Presumably, making them OK to be also annotated as
sleepable.

Building a kernel with DEBUG_ATOMIC_SLEEP options enabled and running
reasonable workloads stimulating activity that would be intercepted by
such security hooks didn't show any splats.

Notably, I haven't added all the security_path_* LSM hooks that are
available as I don't need them at this point in time.

Signed-off-by: Matt Bobrowski <mattbobrowski@google.com>
Acked-by: KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/ZXM3IHHXpNY9y82a@google.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2023-12-13 16:56:19 -08:00
Andrii Nakryiko
f5fdb51fb9 bpf: fail BPF_TOKEN_CREATE if no delegation option was set on BPF FS
It's quite confusing in practice when it's possible to successfully
create a BPF token from BPF FS that didn't have any of delegate_xxx
mount options set up. While it's not wrong, it's actually more
meaningful to reject BPF_TOKEN_CREATE with specific error code (-ENOENT)
to let user-space know that no token delegation is setup up.

So, instead of creating empty BPF token that will be always ignored
because it doesn't have any of the allow_xxx bits set, reject it with
-ENOENT. If we ever need empty BPF token to be possible, we can support
that with extra flag passed into BPF_TOKEN_CREATE.

Acked-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231213190842.3844987-2-andrii@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2023-12-13 15:47:04 -08:00
Jie Jiang
750e785796 bpf: Support uid and gid when mounting bpffs
Parse uid and gid in bpf_parse_param() so that they can be passed in as
the `data` parameter when mount() bpffs. This will be useful when we
want to control which user/group has the control to the mounted bpffs,
otherwise a separate chown() call will be needed.

Signed-off-by: Jie Jiang <jiejiang@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Mike Frysinger <vapier@chromium.org>
Acked-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20231212093923.497838-1-jiejiang@chromium.org
2023-12-13 15:37:42 -08:00
Andrei Matei
745e031130 bpf: Comment on check_mem_size_reg
This patch adds a comment to check_mem_size_reg -- a function whose
meaning is not very transparent. The function implicitly deals with two
registers connected by convention, which is not obvious.

Signed-off-by: Andrei Matei <andreimatei1@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20231210225149.67639-1-andreimatei1@gmail.com
2023-12-12 15:35:32 -08:00
Yang Li
56c26d5ad8 bpf: Remove unused backtrack_state helper functions
The function are defined in the verifier.c file, but not called
elsewhere, so delete the unused function.

kernel/bpf/verifier.c:3448:20: warning: unused function 'bt_set_slot'
kernel/bpf/verifier.c:3453:20: warning: unused function 'bt_clear_slot'
kernel/bpf/verifier.c:3488:20: warning: unused function 'bt_is_slot_set'

Reported-by: Abaci Robot <abaci@linux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: Yang Li <yang.lee@linux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20231212005436.103829-1-yang.lee@linux.alibaba.com

Closes: https://bugzilla.openanolis.cn/show_bug.cgi?id=7714
2023-12-12 09:52:07 -08:00
Andrii Nakryiko
1a1ad782dc bpf: tidy up exception callback management a bit
Use the fact that we are passing subprog index around and have
a corresponding struct bpf_subprog_info in bpf_verifier_env for each
subprogram. We don't need to separately pass around a flag whether
subprog is exception callback or not, each relevant verifier function
can determine this using provided subprog index if we maintain
bpf_subprog_info properly.

Also move out exception callback-specific logic from
btf_prepare_func_args(), keeping it generic. We can enforce all these
restriction right before exception callback verification pass. We add
out parameter, arg_cnt, for now, but this will be unnecessary with
subsequent refactoring and will be removed.

Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231204233931.49758-4-andrii@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2023-12-11 19:23:32 -08:00
Andrii Nakryiko
22b769bb4f bpf: emit more dynptr information in verifier log
Emit dynptr type for CONST_PTR_TO_DYNPTR register. Also emit id,
ref_obj_id, and dynptr_id fields for STACK_DYNPTR stack slots.

Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231204233931.49758-3-andrii@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2023-12-11 19:21:22 -08:00
Andrii Nakryiko
1e68485d82 bpf: log PTR_TO_MEM memory size in verifier log
Emit valid memory size addressable through PTR_TO_MEM register.

Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231204233931.49758-2-andrii@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2023-12-11 19:21:22 -08:00
David Vernet
a6de18f310 bpf: Add bpf_cpumask_weight() kfunc
It can be useful to query how many bits are set in a cpumask. For
example, if you want to perform special logic for the last remaining
core that's set in a mask. Let's therefore add a new
bpf_cpumask_weight() kfunc which checks how many bits are set in a mask.

Signed-off-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231207210843.168466-2-void@manifault.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2023-12-09 21:37:33 -08:00
Andrii Nakryiko
482d548d40 bpf: handle fake register spill to stack with BPF_ST_MEM instruction
When verifier validates BPF_ST_MEM instruction that stores known
constant to stack (e.g., *(u64 *)(r10 - 8) = 123), it effectively spills
a fake register with a constant (but initially imprecise) value to
a stack slot. Because read-side logic treats it as a proper register
fill from stack slot, we need to mark such stack slot initialization as
INSN_F_STACK_ACCESS instruction to stop precision backtracking from
missing it.

Fixes: 41f6f64e69 ("bpf: support non-r10 register spill/fill to/from stack in precision tracking")
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231209010958.66758-1-andrii@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2023-12-09 18:43:20 -08:00
Hou Tao
06e5c999f1 bpf: Set uattr->batch.count as zero before batched update or deletion
generic_map_{delete,update}_batch() doesn't set uattr->batch.count as
zero before it tries to allocate memory for key. If the memory
allocation fails, the value of uattr->batch.count will be incorrect.

Fix it by setting uattr->batch.count as zero beore batched update or
deletion.

Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231208102355.2628918-6-houtao@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2023-12-09 18:12:34 -08:00
Hou Tao
67ad2c73ff bpf: Only call maybe_wait_bpf_programs() when map operation succeeds
There is no need to call maybe_wait_bpf_programs() if update or deletion
operation fails. So only call maybe_wait_bpf_programs() if update or
deletion operation succeeds.

Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231208102355.2628918-5-houtao@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2023-12-09 18:12:34 -08:00
Hou Tao
012772581d bpf: Add missed maybe_wait_bpf_programs() for htab of maps
When doing batched lookup and deletion operations on htab of maps,
maybe_wait_bpf_programs() is needed to ensure all programs don't use the
inner map after the bpf syscall returns.

Instead of adding the wait in __htab_map_lookup_and_delete_batch(),
adding the wait in bpf_map_do_batch() and also removing the calling of
maybe_wait_bpf_programs() from generic_map_{delete,update}_batch().

Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231208102355.2628918-4-houtao@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2023-12-09 18:12:34 -08:00
Hou Tao
37ba5b59d6 bpf: Call maybe_wait_bpf_programs() only once for generic_map_update_batch()
Just like commit 9087c6ff8d ("bpf: Call maybe_wait_bpf_programs() only
once from generic_map_delete_batch()"), there is also no need to call
maybe_wait_bpf_programs() for each update in batched update, so only
call it once in generic_map_update_batch().

Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231208102355.2628918-3-houtao@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2023-12-09 18:12:33 -08:00
Hou Tao
c26f2a8901 bpf: Remove unnecessary wait from bpf_map_copy_value()
Both map_lookup_elem() and generic_map_lookup_batch() use
bpf_map_copy_value() to lookup and copy the value, and there is no
update operation in bpf_map_copy_value(), so just remove the invocation
of maybe_wait_bpf_programs() from it.

Fixes: 15c14a3dca ("bpf: Add bpf_map_{value_size, update_value, map_copy_value} functions")
Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231208102355.2628918-2-houtao@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2023-12-09 18:12:33 -08:00
Yafang Shao
73d9eb340d bpf: Enable bpf_cgrp_storage for cgroup1 non-attach case
In the current cgroup1 environment, associating operations between cgroups
and applications in a BPF program requires storing a mapping of cgroup_id
to application either in a hash map or maintaining it in userspace.
However, by enabling bpf_cgrp_storage for cgroup1, it becomes possible to
conveniently store application-specific information in cgroup-local storage
and utilize it within BPF programs. Furthermore, enabling this feature for
cgroup1 involves minor modifications for the non-attach case, streamlining
the process.

However, when it comes to enabling this functionality for the cgroup1
attach case, it presents challenges. Therefore, the decision is to focus on
enabling it solely for the cgroup1 non-attach case at present. If
attempting to attach to a cgroup1 fd, the operation will simply fail with
the error code -EBADF.

Signed-off-by: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231206115326.4295-2-laoar.shao@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
2023-12-08 17:08:18 -08:00
Andrei Matei
2929bfac00 bpf: Minor cleanup around stack bounds
Push the rounding up of stack offsets into the function responsible for
growing the stack, rather than relying on all the callers to do it.
Uncertainty about whether the callers did it or not tripped up people in
a previous review.

Signed-off-by: Andrei Matei <andreimatei1@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20231208032519.260451-4-andreimatei1@gmail.com
2023-12-08 14:19:00 -08:00
Andrei Matei
6b4a64bafd bpf: Fix accesses to uninit stack slots
Privileged programs are supposed to be able to read uninitialized stack
memory (ever since 6715df8d5) but, before this patch, these accesses
were permitted inconsistently. In particular, accesses were permitted
above state->allocated_stack, but not below it. In other words, if the
stack was already "large enough", the access was permitted, but
otherwise the access was rejected instead of being allowed to "grow the
stack". This undesired rejection was happening in two places:
- in check_stack_slot_within_bounds()
- in check_stack_range_initialized()
This patch arranges for these accesses to be permitted. A bunch of tests
that were relying on the old rejection had to change; all of them were
changed to add also run unprivileged, in which case the old behavior
persists. One tests couldn't be updated - global_func16 - because it
can't run unprivileged for other reasons.

This patch also fixes the tracking of the stack size for variable-offset
reads. This second fix is bundled in the same commit as the first one
because they're inter-related. Before this patch, writes to the stack
using registers containing a variable offset (as opposed to registers
with fixed, known values) were not properly contributing to the
function's needed stack size. As a result, it was possible for a program
to verify, but then to attempt to read out-of-bounds data at runtime
because a too small stack had been allocated for it.

Each function tracks the size of the stack it needs in
bpf_subprog_info.stack_depth, which is maintained by
update_stack_depth(). For regular memory accesses, check_mem_access()
was calling update_state_depth() but it was passing in only the fixed
part of the offset register, ignoring the variable offset. This was
incorrect; the minimum possible value of that register should be used
instead.

This tracking is now fixed by centralizing the tracking of stack size in
grow_stack_state(), and by lifting the calls to grow_stack_state() to
check_stack_access_within_bounds() as suggested by Andrii. The code is
now simpler and more convincingly tracks the correct maximum stack size.
check_stack_range_initialized() can now rely on enough stack having been
allocated for the access; this helps with the fix for the first issue.

A few tests were changed to also check the stack depth computation. The
one that fails without this patch is verifier_var_off:stack_write_priv_vs_unpriv.

Fixes: 01f810ace9 ("bpf: Allow variable-offset stack access")
Reported-by: Hao Sun <sunhao.th@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrei Matei <andreimatei1@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20231208032519.260451-3-andreimatei1@gmail.com

Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/CABWLsev9g8UP_c3a=1qbuZUi20tGoUXoU07FPf-5FLvhOKOY+Q@mail.gmail.com/
2023-12-08 14:19:00 -08:00
Jakub Kicinski
2483e7f04c Merge git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/netdev/net
Cross-merge networking fixes after downstream PR.

Conflicts:

drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac5.c
drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac5.h
drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwxgmac2_core.c
drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/hwif.h
  37e4b8df27 ("net: stmmac: fix FPE events losing")
  c3f3b97238 ("net: stmmac: Refactor EST implementation")
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20231206110306.01e91114@canb.auug.org.au/

Adjacent changes:

net/ipv4/tcp_ao.c
  9396c4ee93 ("net/tcp: Don't store TCP-AO maclen on reqsk")
  7b0f570f87 ("tcp: Move TCP-AO bits from cookie_v[46]_check() to tcp_ao_syncookie().")

Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
2023-12-07 17:53:17 -08:00
Andrei Matei
1d38a9ee81 bpf: Guard stack limits against 32bit overflow
This patch promotes the arithmetic around checking stack bounds to be
done in the 64-bit domain, instead of the current 32bit. The arithmetic
implies adding together a 64-bit register with a int offset. The
register was checked to be below 1<<29 when it was variable, but not
when it was fixed. The offset either comes from an instruction (in which
case it is 16 bit), from another register (in which case the caller
checked it to be below 1<<29 [1]), or from the size of an argument to a
kfunc (in which case it can be a u32 [2]). Between the register being
inconsistently checked to be below 1<<29, and the offset being up to an
u32, it appears that we were open to overflowing the `int`s which were
currently used for arithmetic.

[1] 815fb87b75/kernel/bpf/verifier.c (L7494-L7498)
[2] 815fb87b75/kernel/bpf/verifier.c (L11904)

Reported-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrei Matei <andreimatei1@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20231207041150.229139-4-andreimatei1@gmail.com
2023-12-07 13:58:10 -08:00
Andrei Matei
a833a17aea bpf: Fix verification of indirect var-off stack access
This patch fixes a bug around the verification of possibly-zero-sized
stack accesses. When the access was done through a var-offset stack
pointer, check_stack_access_within_bounds was incorrectly computing the
maximum-offset of a zero-sized read to be the same as the register's min
offset. Instead, we have to take in account the register's maximum
possible value. The patch also simplifies how the max offset is checked;
the check is now simpler than for min offset.

The bug was allowing accesses to erroneously pass the
check_stack_access_within_bounds() checks, only to later crash in
check_stack_range_initialized() when all the possibly-affected stack
slots are iterated (this time with a correct max offset).
check_stack_range_initialized() is relying on
check_stack_access_within_bounds() for its accesses to the
stack-tracking vector to be within bounds; in the case of zero-sized
accesses, we were essentially only verifying that the lowest possible
slot was within bounds. We would crash when the max-offset of the stack
pointer was >= 0 (which shouldn't pass verification, and hopefully is
not something anyone's code attempts to do in practice).

Thanks Hao for reporting!

Fixes: 01f810ace9 ("bpf: Allow variable-offset stack access")
Reported-by: Hao Sun <sunhao.th@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrei Matei <andreimatei1@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20231207041150.229139-2-andreimatei1@gmail.com

Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/CACkBjsZGEUaRCHsmaX=h-efVogsRfK1FPxmkgb0Os_frnHiNdw@mail.gmail.com/
2023-12-07 13:57:53 -08:00
Song Liu
26ef208c20 bpf: Use arch_bpf_trampoline_size
Instead of blindly allocating PAGE_SIZE for each trampoline, check the size
of the trampoline with arch_bpf_trampoline_size(). This size is saved in
bpf_tramp_image->size, and used for modmem charge/uncharge. The fallback
arch_alloc_bpf_trampoline() still allocates a whole page because we need to
use set_memory_* to protect the memory.

struct_ops trampoline still uses a whole page for multiple trampolines.

With this size check at caller (regular trampoline and struct_ops
trampoline), remove arch_bpf_trampoline_size() from
arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline() in archs.

Also, update bpf_image_ksym_add() to handle symbol of different sizes.

Signed-off-by: Song Liu <song@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
Tested-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>  # on s390x
Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn@rivosinc.com>
Tested-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn@rivosinc.com> # on riscv
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231206224054.492250-7-song@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2023-12-06 17:17:20 -08:00
Song Liu
96d1b7c081 bpf: Add arch_bpf_trampoline_size()
This helper will be used to calculate the size of the trampoline before
allocating the memory.

arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline() for arm64 and riscv64 can use
arch_bpf_trampoline_size() to check the trampoline fits in the image.

OTOH, arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline() for s390 has to call the JIT process
twice, so it cannot use arch_bpf_trampoline_size().

Signed-off-by: Song Liu <song@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
Tested-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>  # on s390x
Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn@rivosinc.com>
Tested-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn@rivosinc.com> # on riscv
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231206224054.492250-6-song@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2023-12-06 17:17:20 -08:00
Song Liu
82583daa2e bpf: Add helpers for trampoline image management
As BPF trampoline of different archs moves from bpf_jit_[alloc|free]_exec()
to bpf_prog_pack_[alloc|free](), we need to use different _alloc, _free for
different archs during the transition. Add the following helpers for this
transition:

void *arch_alloc_bpf_trampoline(unsigned int size);
void arch_free_bpf_trampoline(void *image, unsigned int size);
void arch_protect_bpf_trampoline(void *image, unsigned int size);
void arch_unprotect_bpf_trampoline(void *image, unsigned int size);

The fallback version of these helpers require size <= PAGE_SIZE, but they
are only called with size == PAGE_SIZE. They will be called with size <
PAGE_SIZE when arch_bpf_trampoline_size() helper is introduced later.

Signed-off-by: Song Liu <song@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
Tested-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>  # on s390x
Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231206224054.492250-4-song@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2023-12-06 17:17:20 -08:00
Song Liu
7a3d9a159b bpf: Adjust argument names of arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline()
We are using "im" for "struct bpf_tramp_image" and "tr" for "struct
bpf_trampoline" in most of the code base. The only exception is the
prototype and fallback version of arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline(). Update
them to match the rest of the code base.

We mix "orig_call" and "func_addr" for the argument in different versions
of arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline(). s/orig_call/func_addr/g so they match.

Signed-off-by: Song Liu <song@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
Tested-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>  # on s390x
Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231206224054.492250-3-song@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2023-12-06 17:17:20 -08:00
Song Liu
f08a1c6582 bpf: Let bpf_prog_pack_free handle any pointer
Currently, bpf_prog_pack_free only can only free pointer to struct
bpf_binary_header, which is not flexible. Add a size argument to
bpf_prog_pack_free so that it can handle any pointer.

Signed-off-by: Song Liu <song@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
Tested-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>  # on s390x
Reviewed-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn@rivosinc.com>
Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231206224054.492250-2-song@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2023-12-06 17:17:20 -08:00
Jiri Olsa
4b7de80160 bpf: Fix prog_array_map_poke_run map poke update
Lee pointed out issue found by syscaller [0] hitting BUG in prog array
map poke update in prog_array_map_poke_run function due to error value
returned from bpf_arch_text_poke function.

There's race window where bpf_arch_text_poke can fail due to missing
bpf program kallsym symbols, which is accounted for with check for
-EINVAL in that BUG_ON call.

The problem is that in such case we won't update the tail call jump
and cause imbalance for the next tail call update check which will
fail with -EBUSY in bpf_arch_text_poke.

I'm hitting following race during the program load:

  CPU 0                             CPU 1

  bpf_prog_load
    bpf_check
      do_misc_fixups
        prog_array_map_poke_track

                                    map_update_elem
                                      bpf_fd_array_map_update_elem
                                        prog_array_map_poke_run

                                          bpf_arch_text_poke returns -EINVAL

    bpf_prog_kallsyms_add

After bpf_arch_text_poke (CPU 1) fails to update the tail call jump, the next
poke update fails on expected jump instruction check in bpf_arch_text_poke
with -EBUSY and triggers the BUG_ON in prog_array_map_poke_run.

Similar race exists on the program unload.

Fixing this by moving the update to bpf_arch_poke_desc_update function which
makes sure we call __bpf_arch_text_poke that skips the bpf address check.

Each architecture has slightly different approach wrt looking up bpf address
in bpf_arch_text_poke, so instead of splitting the function or adding new
'checkip' argument in previous version, it seems best to move the whole
map_poke_run update as arch specific code.

  [0] https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=97a4fe20470e9bc30810

Fixes: ebf7d1f508 ("bpf, x64: rework pro/epilogue and tailcall handling in JIT")
Reported-by: syzbot+97a4fe20470e9bc30810@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
Cc: Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org>
Cc: Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20231206083041.1306660-2-jolsa@kernel.org
2023-12-06 22:40:16 +01:00
Andrii Nakryiko
d734ca7b33 bpf,lsm: add BPF token LSM hooks
Wire up bpf_token_create and bpf_token_free LSM hooks, which allow to
allocate LSM security blob (we add `void *security` field to struct
bpf_token for that), but also control who can instantiate BPF token.
This follows existing pattern for BPF map and BPF prog.

Also add security_bpf_token_allow_cmd() and security_bpf_token_capable()
LSM hooks that allow LSM implementation to control and negate (if
necessary) BPF token's delegation of a specific bpf_cmd and capability,
respectively.

Acked-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231130185229.2688956-12-andrii@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2023-12-06 10:03:00 -08:00
Andrii Nakryiko
66d636d70a bpf,lsm: refactor bpf_map_alloc/bpf_map_free LSM hooks
Similarly to bpf_prog_alloc LSM hook, rename and extend bpf_map_alloc
hook into bpf_map_create, taking not just struct bpf_map, but also
bpf_attr and bpf_token, to give a fuller context to LSMs.

Unlike bpf_prog_alloc, there is no need to move the hook around, as it
currently is firing right before allocating BPF map ID and FD, which
seems to be a sweet spot.

But like bpf_prog_alloc/bpf_prog_free combo, make sure that bpf_map_free
LSM hook is called even if bpf_map_create hook returned error, as if few
LSMs are combined together it could be that one LSM successfully
allocated security blob for its needs, while subsequent LSM rejected BPF
map creation. The former LSM would still need to free up LSM blob, so we
need to ensure security_bpf_map_free() is called regardless of the
outcome.

Acked-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231130185229.2688956-11-andrii@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2023-12-06 10:02:59 -08:00
Andrii Nakryiko
c3dd6e94df bpf,lsm: refactor bpf_prog_alloc/bpf_prog_free LSM hooks
Based on upstream discussion ([0]), rework existing
bpf_prog_alloc_security LSM hook. Rename it to bpf_prog_load and instead
of passing bpf_prog_aux, pass proper bpf_prog pointer for a full BPF
program struct. Also, we pass bpf_attr union with all the user-provided
arguments for BPF_PROG_LOAD command.  This will give LSMs as much
information as we can basically provide.

The hook is also BPF token-aware now, and optional bpf_token struct is
passed as a third argument. bpf_prog_load LSM hook is called after
a bunch of sanity checks were performed, bpf_prog and bpf_prog_aux were
allocated and filled out, but right before performing full-fledged BPF
verification step.

bpf_prog_free LSM hook is now accepting struct bpf_prog argument, for
consistency. SELinux code is adjusted to all new names, types, and
signatures.

Note, given that bpf_prog_load (previously bpf_prog_alloc) hook can be
used by some LSMs to allocate extra security blob, but also by other
LSMs to reject BPF program loading, we need to make sure that
bpf_prog_free LSM hook is called after bpf_prog_load/bpf_prog_alloc one
*even* if the hook itself returned error. If we don't do that, we run
the risk of leaking memory. This seems to be possible today when
combining SELinux and BPF LSM, as one example, depending on their
relative ordering.

Also, for BPF LSM setup, add bpf_prog_load and bpf_prog_free to
sleepable LSM hooks list, as they are both executed in sleepable
context. Also drop bpf_prog_load hook from untrusted, as there is no
issue with refcount or anything else anymore, that originally forced us
to add it to untrusted list in c0c852dd18 ("bpf: Do not mark certain LSM
hook arguments as trusted"). We now trigger this hook much later and it
should not be an issue anymore.

  [0] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/9fe88aef7deabbe87d3fc38c4aea3c69.paul@paul-moore.com/

Acked-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231130185229.2688956-10-andrii@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2023-12-06 10:02:59 -08:00
Andrii Nakryiko
8062fb12de bpf: consistently use BPF token throughout BPF verifier logic
Remove remaining direct queries to perfmon_capable() and bpf_capable()
in BPF verifier logic and instead use BPF token (if available) to make
decisions about privileges.

Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231130185229.2688956-9-andrii@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2023-12-06 10:02:59 -08:00
Andrii Nakryiko
4cbb270e11 bpf: take into account BPF token when fetching helper protos
Instead of performing unconditional system-wide bpf_capable() and
perfmon_capable() calls inside bpf_base_func_proto() function (and other
similar ones) to determine eligibility of a given BPF helper for a given
program, use previously recorded BPF token during BPF_PROG_LOAD command
handling to inform the decision.

Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231130185229.2688956-8-andrii@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2023-12-06 10:02:59 -08:00
Andrii Nakryiko
e1cef620f5 bpf: add BPF token support to BPF_PROG_LOAD command
Add basic support of BPF token to BPF_PROG_LOAD. Wire through a set of
allowed BPF program types and attach types, derived from BPF FS at BPF
token creation time. Then make sure we perform bpf_token_capable()
checks everywhere where it's relevant.

Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231130185229.2688956-7-andrii@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2023-12-06 10:02:59 -08:00
Andrii Nakryiko
ee54b1a910 bpf: add BPF token support to BPF_BTF_LOAD command
Accept BPF token FD in BPF_BTF_LOAD command to allow BTF data loading
through delegated BPF token. BTF loading is a pretty straightforward
operation, so as long as BPF token is created with allow_cmds granting
BPF_BTF_LOAD command, kernel proceeds to parsing BTF data and creating
BTF object.

Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231130185229.2688956-6-andrii@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2023-12-06 10:02:59 -08:00
Andrii Nakryiko
688b7270b3 bpf: add BPF token support to BPF_MAP_CREATE command
Allow providing token_fd for BPF_MAP_CREATE command to allow controlled
BPF map creation from unprivileged process through delegated BPF token.

Wire through a set of allowed BPF map types to BPF token, derived from
BPF FS at BPF token creation time. This, in combination with allowed_cmds
allows to create a narrowly-focused BPF token (controlled by privileged
agent) with a restrictive set of BPF maps that application can attempt
to create.

Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231130185229.2688956-5-andrii@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2023-12-06 10:02:59 -08:00
Andrii Nakryiko
4527358b76 bpf: introduce BPF token object
Add new kind of BPF kernel object, BPF token. BPF token is meant to
allow delegating privileged BPF functionality, like loading a BPF
program or creating a BPF map, from privileged process to a *trusted*
unprivileged process, all while having a good amount of control over which
privileged operations could be performed using provided BPF token.

This is achieved through mounting BPF FS instance with extra delegation
mount options, which determine what operations are delegatable, and also
constraining it to the owning user namespace (as mentioned in the
previous patch).

BPF token itself is just a derivative from BPF FS and can be created
through a new bpf() syscall command, BPF_TOKEN_CREATE, which accepts BPF
FS FD, which can be attained through open() API by opening BPF FS mount
point. Currently, BPF token "inherits" delegated command, map types,
prog type, and attach type bit sets from BPF FS as is. In the future,
having an BPF token as a separate object with its own FD, we can allow
to further restrict BPF token's allowable set of things either at the
creation time or after the fact, allowing the process to guard itself
further from unintentionally trying to load undesired kind of BPF
programs. But for now we keep things simple and just copy bit sets as is.

When BPF token is created from BPF FS mount, we take reference to the
BPF super block's owning user namespace, and then use that namespace for
checking all the {CAP_BPF, CAP_PERFMON, CAP_NET_ADMIN, CAP_SYS_ADMIN}
capabilities that are normally only checked against init userns (using
capable()), but now we check them using ns_capable() instead (if BPF
token is provided). See bpf_token_capable() for details.

Such setup means that BPF token in itself is not sufficient to grant BPF
functionality. User namespaced process has to *also* have necessary
combination of capabilities inside that user namespace. So while
previously CAP_BPF was useless when granted within user namespace, now
it gains a meaning and allows container managers and sys admins to have
a flexible control over which processes can and need to use BPF
functionality within the user namespace (i.e., container in practice).
And BPF FS delegation mount options and derived BPF tokens serve as
a per-container "flag" to grant overall ability to use bpf() (plus further
restrict on which parts of bpf() syscalls are treated as namespaced).

Note also, BPF_TOKEN_CREATE command itself requires ns_capable(CAP_BPF)
within the BPF FS owning user namespace, rounding up the ns_capable()
story of BPF token.

Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231130185229.2688956-4-andrii@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2023-12-06 10:02:59 -08:00
Andrii Nakryiko
40bba140c6 bpf: add BPF token delegation mount options to BPF FS
Add few new mount options to BPF FS that allow to specify that a given
BPF FS instance allows creation of BPF token (added in the next patch),
and what sort of operations are allowed under BPF token. As such, we get
4 new mount options, each is a bit mask
  - `delegate_cmds` allow to specify which bpf() syscall commands are
    allowed with BPF token derived from this BPF FS instance;
  - if BPF_MAP_CREATE command is allowed, `delegate_maps` specifies
    a set of allowable BPF map types that could be created with BPF token;
  - if BPF_PROG_LOAD command is allowed, `delegate_progs` specifies
    a set of allowable BPF program types that could be loaded with BPF token;
  - if BPF_PROG_LOAD command is allowed, `delegate_attachs` specifies
    a set of allowable BPF program attach types that could be loaded with
    BPF token; delegate_progs and delegate_attachs are meant to be used
    together, as full BPF program type is, in general, determined
    through both program type and program attach type.

Currently, these mount options accept the following forms of values:
  - a special value "any", that enables all possible values of a given
  bit set;
  - numeric value (decimal or hexadecimal, determined by kernel
  automatically) that specifies a bit mask value directly;
  - all the values for a given mount option are combined, if specified
  multiple times. E.g., `mount -t bpf nodev /path/to/mount -o
  delegate_maps=0x1 -o delegate_maps=0x2` will result in a combined 0x3
  mask.

Ideally, more convenient (for humans) symbolic form derived from
corresponding UAPI enums would be accepted (e.g., `-o
delegate_progs=kprobe|tracepoint`) and I intend to implement this, but
it requires a bunch of UAPI header churn, so I postponed it until this
feature lands upstream or at least there is a definite consensus that
this feature is acceptable and is going to make it, just to minimize
amount of wasted effort and not increase amount of non-essential code to
be reviewed.

Attentive reader will notice that BPF FS is now marked as
FS_USERNS_MOUNT, which theoretically makes it mountable inside non-init
user namespace as long as the process has sufficient *namespaced*
capabilities within that user namespace. But in reality we still
restrict BPF FS to be mountable only by processes with CAP_SYS_ADMIN *in
init userns* (extra check in bpf_fill_super()). FS_USERNS_MOUNT is added
to allow creating BPF FS context object (i.e., fsopen("bpf")) from
inside unprivileged process inside non-init userns, to capture that
userns as the owning userns. It will still be required to pass this
context object back to privileged process to instantiate and mount it.

This manipulation is important, because capturing non-init userns as the
owning userns of BPF FS instance (super block) allows to use that userns
to constraint BPF token to that userns later on (see next patch). So
creating BPF FS with delegation inside unprivileged userns will restrict
derived BPF token objects to only "work" inside that intended userns,
making it scoped to a intended "container". Also, setting these
delegation options requires capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN), so unprivileged
process cannot set this up without involvement of a privileged process.

There is a set of selftests at the end of the patch set that simulates
this sequence of steps and validates that everything works as intended.
But careful review is requested to make sure there are no missed gaps in
the implementation and testing.

This somewhat subtle set of aspects is the result of previous
discussions ([0]) about various user namespace implications and
interactions with BPF token functionality and is necessary to contain
BPF token inside intended user namespace.

  [0] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230704-hochverdient-lehne-eeb9eeef785e@brauner/

Acked-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231130185229.2688956-3-andrii@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2023-12-06 10:02:58 -08:00
Andrii Nakryiko
909fa05dd3 bpf: align CAP_NET_ADMIN checks with bpf_capable() approach
Within BPF syscall handling code CAP_NET_ADMIN checks stand out a bit
compared to CAP_BPF and CAP_PERFMON checks. For the latter, CAP_BPF or
CAP_PERFMON are checked first, but if they are not set, CAP_SYS_ADMIN
takes over and grants whatever part of BPF syscall is required.

Similar kind of checks that involve CAP_NET_ADMIN are not so consistent.
One out of four uses does follow CAP_BPF/CAP_PERFMON model: during
BPF_PROG_LOAD, if the type of BPF program is "network-related" either
CAP_NET_ADMIN or CAP_SYS_ADMIN is required to proceed.

But in three other cases CAP_NET_ADMIN is required even if CAP_SYS_ADMIN
is set:
  - when creating DEVMAP/XDKMAP/CPU_MAP maps;
  - when attaching CGROUP_SKB programs;
  - when handling BPF_PROG_QUERY command.

This patch is changing the latter three cases to follow BPF_PROG_LOAD
model, that is allowing to proceed under either CAP_NET_ADMIN or
CAP_SYS_ADMIN.

This also makes it cleaner in subsequent BPF token patches to switch
wholesomely to a generic bpf_token_capable(int cap) check, that always
falls back to CAP_SYS_ADMIN if requested capability is missing.

Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231130185229.2688956-2-andrii@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2023-12-06 10:02:58 -08:00
Andrii Nakryiko
18a433b620 bpf: track aligned STACK_ZERO cases as imprecise spilled registers
Now that precision backtracing is supporting register spill/fill to/from
stack, there is another oportunity to be exploited here: minimizing
precise STACK_ZERO cases. With a simple code change we can rely on
initially imprecise register spill tracking for cases when register
spilled to stack was a known zero.

This is a very common case for initializing on the stack variables,
including rather large structures. Often times zero has no special
meaning for the subsequent BPF program logic and is often overwritten
with non-zero values soon afterwards. But due to STACK_ZERO vs
STACK_MISC tracking, such initial zero initialization actually causes
duplication of verifier states as STACK_ZERO is clearly different than
STACK_MISC or spilled SCALAR_VALUE register.

The effect of this (now) trivial change is huge, as can be seen below.
These are differences between BPF selftests, Cilium, and Meta-internal
BPF object files relative to previous patch in this series. You can see
improvements ranging from single-digit percentage improvement for
instructions and states, all the way to 50-60% reduction for some of
Meta-internal host agent programs, and even some Cilium programs.

For Meta-internal ones I left only the differences for largest BPF
object files by states/instructions, as there were too many differences
in the overall output. All the differences were improvements, reducting
number of states and thus instructions validated.

Note, Meta-internal BPF object file names are not printed below.
Many copies of balancer_ingress are actually many different
configurations of Katran, so they are different BPF programs, which
explains state reduction going from -16% all the way to 31%, depending
on BPF program logic complexity.

I also tooked a closer look at a few small-ish BPF programs to validate
the behavior. Let's take bpf_iter_netrlink.bpf.o (first row below).
While it's just 8 vs 5 states, verifier log is still pretty long to
include it here. But the reduction in states is due to the following
piece of C code:

        unsigned long ino;

	...

        sk = s->sk_socket;
        if (!sk) {
                ino = 0;
        } else {
                inode = SOCK_INODE(sk);
                bpf_probe_read_kernel(&ino, sizeof(ino), &inode->i_ino);
        }
        BPF_SEQ_PRINTF(seq, "%-8u %-8lu\n", s->sk_drops.counter, ino);
	return 0;

You can see that in some situations `ino` is zero-initialized, while in
others it's unknown value filled out by bpf_probe_read_kernel(). Before
this change code after if/else branches have to be validated twice. Once
with (precise) ino == 0, due to eager STACK_ZERO logic, and then again
for when ino is just STACK_MISC. But BPF_SEQ_PRINTF() doesn't care about
precise value of ino, so with the change in this patch verifier is able
to prune states from after one of the branches, reducing number of total
states (and instructions) required for successful validation.

Similar principle applies to bigger real-world applications, just at
a much larger scale.

SELFTESTS
=========
File                                     Program                  Insns (A)  Insns (B)  Insns    (DIFF)  States (A)  States (B)  States (DIFF)
---------------------------------------  -----------------------  ---------  ---------  ---------------  ----------  ----------  -------------
bpf_iter_netlink.bpf.linked3.o           dump_netlink                   148        104    -44 (-29.73%)           8           5   -3 (-37.50%)
bpf_iter_unix.bpf.linked3.o              dump_unix                     8474       8404     -70 (-0.83%)         151         147    -4 (-2.65%)
bpf_loop.bpf.linked3.o                   stack_check                    560        324   -236 (-42.14%)          42          24  -18 (-42.86%)
local_storage_bench.bpf.linked3.o        get_local                      120         77    -43 (-35.83%)           9           6   -3 (-33.33%)
loop6.bpf.linked3.o                      trace_virtqueue_add_sgs      10167       9868    -299 (-2.94%)         226         206   -20 (-8.85%)
pyperf600_bpf_loop.bpf.linked3.o         on_event                      4872       3423  -1449 (-29.74%)         322         229  -93 (-28.88%)
strobemeta.bpf.linked3.o                 on_event                    180697     176036   -4661 (-2.58%)        4780        4734   -46 (-0.96%)
test_cls_redirect.bpf.linked3.o          cls_redirect                 65594      65401    -193 (-0.29%)        4230        4212   -18 (-0.43%)
test_global_func_args.bpf.linked3.o      test_cls                       145        136      -9 (-6.21%)          10           9   -1 (-10.00%)
test_l4lb.bpf.linked3.o                  balancer_ingress              4760       2612  -2148 (-45.13%)         113         102   -11 (-9.73%)
test_l4lb_noinline.bpf.linked3.o         balancer_ingress              4845       4877     +32 (+0.66%)         219         221    +2 (+0.91%)
test_l4lb_noinline_dynptr.bpf.linked3.o  balancer_ingress              2072       2087     +15 (+0.72%)          97          98    +1 (+1.03%)
test_seg6_loop.bpf.linked3.o             __add_egr_x                  12440       9975  -2465 (-19.82%)         364         353   -11 (-3.02%)
test_tcp_hdr_options.bpf.linked3.o       estab                         2558       2572     +14 (+0.55%)         179         180    +1 (+0.56%)
test_xdp_dynptr.bpf.linked3.o            _xdp_tx_iptunnel               645        596     -49 (-7.60%)          26          24    -2 (-7.69%)
test_xdp_noinline.bpf.linked3.o          balancer_ingress_v6           3520       3516      -4 (-0.11%)         216         216    +0 (+0.00%)
xdp_synproxy_kern.bpf.linked3.o          syncookie_tc                 82661      81241   -1420 (-1.72%)        5073        5155   +82 (+1.62%)
xdp_synproxy_kern.bpf.linked3.o          syncookie_xdp                84964      82297   -2667 (-3.14%)        5130        5157   +27 (+0.53%)

META-INTERNAL
=============
Program                                 Insns (A)  Insns (B)  Insns      (DIFF)  States (A)  States (B)  States   (DIFF)
--------------------------------------  ---------  ---------  -----------------  ----------  ----------  ---------------
balancer_ingress                            27925      23608    -4317 (-15.46%)        1488        1482      -6 (-0.40%)
balancer_ingress                            31824      27546    -4278 (-13.44%)        1658        1652      -6 (-0.36%)
balancer_ingress                            32213      27935    -4278 (-13.28%)        1689        1683      -6 (-0.36%)
balancer_ingress                            32213      27935    -4278 (-13.28%)        1689        1683      -6 (-0.36%)
balancer_ingress                            31824      27546    -4278 (-13.44%)        1658        1652      -6 (-0.36%)
balancer_ingress                            38647      29562    -9085 (-23.51%)        2069        1835   -234 (-11.31%)
balancer_ingress                            38647      29562    -9085 (-23.51%)        2069        1835   -234 (-11.31%)
balancer_ingress                            40339      30792    -9547 (-23.67%)        2193        1934   -259 (-11.81%)
balancer_ingress                            37321      29055    -8266 (-22.15%)        1972        1795    -177 (-8.98%)
balancer_ingress                            38176      29753    -8423 (-22.06%)        2008        1831    -177 (-8.81%)
balancer_ingress                            29193      20910    -8283 (-28.37%)        1599        1422   -177 (-11.07%)
balancer_ingress                            30013      21452    -8561 (-28.52%)        1645        1447   -198 (-12.04%)
balancer_ingress                            28691      24290    -4401 (-15.34%)        1545        1531     -14 (-0.91%)
balancer_ingress                            34223      28965    -5258 (-15.36%)        1984        1875    -109 (-5.49%)
balancer_ingress                            35481      26158    -9323 (-26.28%)        2095        1806   -289 (-13.79%)
balancer_ingress                            35481      26158    -9323 (-26.28%)        2095        1806   -289 (-13.79%)
balancer_ingress                            35868      26455    -9413 (-26.24%)        2140        1827   -313 (-14.63%)
balancer_ingress                            35868      26455    -9413 (-26.24%)        2140        1827   -313 (-14.63%)
balancer_ingress                            35481      26158    -9323 (-26.28%)        2095        1806   -289 (-13.79%)
balancer_ingress                            35481      26158    -9323 (-26.28%)        2095        1806   -289 (-13.79%)
balancer_ingress                            34844      29485    -5359 (-15.38%)        2036        1918    -118 (-5.80%)
fbflow_egress                                3256       2652     -604 (-18.55%)         218         192    -26 (-11.93%)
fbflow_ingress                               1026        944       -82 (-7.99%)          70          63     -7 (-10.00%)
sslwall_tc_egress                            8424       7360    -1064 (-12.63%)         498         458     -40 (-8.03%)
syar_accept_protect                         15040       9539    -5501 (-36.58%)         364         220   -144 (-39.56%)
syar_connect_tcp_v6                         15036       9535    -5501 (-36.59%)         360         216   -144 (-40.00%)
syar_connect_udp_v4                         15039       9538    -5501 (-36.58%)         361         217   -144 (-39.89%)
syar_connect_connect4_protect4              24805      15833    -8972 (-36.17%)         756         480   -276 (-36.51%)
syar_lsm_file_open                         167772     151813    -15959 (-9.51%)        1836        1667    -169 (-9.20%)
syar_namespace_create_new                   14805       9304    -5501 (-37.16%)         353         209   -144 (-40.79%)
syar_python3_detect                         17531      12030    -5501 (-31.38%)         391         247   -144 (-36.83%)
syar_ssh_post_fork                          16412      10911    -5501 (-33.52%)         405         261   -144 (-35.56%)
syar_enter_execve                           14728       9227    -5501 (-37.35%)         345         201   -144 (-41.74%)
syar_enter_execveat                         14728       9227    -5501 (-37.35%)         345         201   -144 (-41.74%)
syar_exit_execve                            16622      11121    -5501 (-33.09%)         376         232   -144 (-38.30%)
syar_exit_execveat                          16622      11121    -5501 (-33.09%)         376         232   -144 (-38.30%)
syar_syscalls_kill                          15288       9787    -5501 (-35.98%)         398         254   -144 (-36.18%)
syar_task_enter_pivot_root                  14898       9397    -5501 (-36.92%)         357         213   -144 (-40.34%)
syar_syscalls_setreuid                      16678      11177    -5501 (-32.98%)         429         285   -144 (-33.57%)
syar_syscalls_setuid                        16678      11177    -5501 (-32.98%)         429         285   -144 (-33.57%)
syar_syscalls_process_vm_readv              14959       9458    -5501 (-36.77%)         364         220   -144 (-39.56%)
syar_syscalls_process_vm_writev             15757      10256    -5501 (-34.91%)         390         246   -144 (-36.92%)
do_uprobe                                   15519      10018    -5501 (-35.45%)         373         229   -144 (-38.61%)
edgewall                                   179715      55783  -123932 (-68.96%)       12607        3999  -8608 (-68.28%)
bictcp_state                                 7570       4131    -3439 (-45.43%)         496         269   -227 (-45.77%)
cubictcp_state                               7570       4131    -3439 (-45.43%)         496         269   -227 (-45.77%)
tcp_rate_skb_delivered                        447        272     -175 (-39.15%)          29          18    -11 (-37.93%)
kprobe__bbr_set_state                        4566       2615    -1951 (-42.73%)         209         124    -85 (-40.67%)
kprobe__bictcp_state                         4566       2615    -1951 (-42.73%)         209         124    -85 (-40.67%)
inet_sock_set_state                          1501       1337     -164 (-10.93%)          93          85      -8 (-8.60%)
tcp_retransmit_skb                           1145        981     -164 (-14.32%)          67          59     -8 (-11.94%)
tcp_retransmit_synack                        1183        951     -232 (-19.61%)          67          55    -12 (-17.91%)
bpf_tcptuner                                 1459       1187     -272 (-18.64%)          99          80    -19 (-19.19%)
tw_egress                                     801        776       -25 (-3.12%)          69          66      -3 (-4.35%)
tw_ingress                                    795        770       -25 (-3.14%)          69          66      -3 (-4.35%)
ttls_tc_ingress                             19025      19383      +358 (+1.88%)         470         465      -5 (-1.06%)
ttls_nat_egress                               490        299     -191 (-38.98%)          33          20    -13 (-39.39%)
ttls_nat_ingress                              448        285     -163 (-36.38%)          32          21    -11 (-34.38%)
tw_twfw_egress                             511127     212071  -299056 (-58.51%)       16733        8504  -8229 (-49.18%)
tw_twfw_ingress                            500095     212069  -288026 (-57.59%)       16223        8504  -7719 (-47.58%)
tw_twfw_tc_eg                              511113     212064  -299049 (-58.51%)       16732        8504  -8228 (-49.18%)
tw_twfw_tc_in                              500095     212069  -288026 (-57.59%)       16223        8504  -7719 (-47.58%)
tw_twfw_egress                              12632      12435      -197 (-1.56%)         276         260     -16 (-5.80%)
tw_twfw_ingress                             12631      12454      -177 (-1.40%)         278         261     -17 (-6.12%)
tw_twfw_tc_eg                               12595      12435      -160 (-1.27%)         274         259     -15 (-5.47%)
tw_twfw_tc_in                               12631      12454      -177 (-1.40%)         278         261     -17 (-6.12%)
tw_xdp_dump                                   266        209      -57 (-21.43%)           9           8     -1 (-11.11%)

CILIUM
=========
File           Program                           Insns (A)  Insns (B)  Insns     (DIFF)  States (A)  States (B)  States  (DIFF)
-------------  --------------------------------  ---------  ---------  ----------------  ----------  ----------  --------------
bpf_host.o     cil_to_netdev                          6047       4578   -1469 (-24.29%)         362         249  -113 (-31.22%)
bpf_host.o     handle_lxc_traffic                     2227       1585    -642 (-28.83%)         156         103   -53 (-33.97%)
bpf_host.o     tail_handle_ipv4_from_netdev           2244       1458    -786 (-35.03%)         163         106   -57 (-34.97%)
bpf_host.o     tail_handle_nat_fwd_ipv4              21022      10479  -10543 (-50.15%)        1289         670  -619 (-48.02%)
bpf_host.o     tail_handle_nat_fwd_ipv6              15433      11375   -4058 (-26.29%)         905         643  -262 (-28.95%)
bpf_host.o     tail_ipv4_host_policy_ingress          2219       1367    -852 (-38.40%)         161          96   -65 (-40.37%)
bpf_host.o     tail_nodeport_nat_egress_ipv4         22460      19862   -2598 (-11.57%)        1469        1293  -176 (-11.98%)
bpf_host.o     tail_nodeport_nat_ingress_ipv4         5526       3534   -1992 (-36.05%)         366         243  -123 (-33.61%)
bpf_host.o     tail_nodeport_nat_ingress_ipv6         5132       4256    -876 (-17.07%)         241         219    -22 (-9.13%)
bpf_host.o     tail_nodeport_nat_ipv6_egress          3702       3542     -160 (-4.32%)         215         205    -10 (-4.65%)
bpf_lxc.o      tail_handle_nat_fwd_ipv4              21022      10479  -10543 (-50.15%)        1289         670  -619 (-48.02%)
bpf_lxc.o      tail_handle_nat_fwd_ipv6              15433      11375   -4058 (-26.29%)         905         643  -262 (-28.95%)
bpf_lxc.o      tail_ipv4_ct_egress                    5073       3374   -1699 (-33.49%)         262         172   -90 (-34.35%)
bpf_lxc.o      tail_ipv4_ct_ingress                   5093       3385   -1708 (-33.54%)         262         172   -90 (-34.35%)
bpf_lxc.o      tail_ipv4_ct_ingress_policy_only       5093       3385   -1708 (-33.54%)         262         172   -90 (-34.35%)
bpf_lxc.o      tail_ipv6_ct_egress                    4593       3878    -715 (-15.57%)         194         151   -43 (-22.16%)
bpf_lxc.o      tail_ipv6_ct_ingress                   4606       3891    -715 (-15.52%)         194         151   -43 (-22.16%)
bpf_lxc.o      tail_ipv6_ct_ingress_policy_only       4606       3891    -715 (-15.52%)         194         151   -43 (-22.16%)
bpf_lxc.o      tail_nodeport_nat_ingress_ipv4         5526       3534   -1992 (-36.05%)         366         243  -123 (-33.61%)
bpf_lxc.o      tail_nodeport_nat_ingress_ipv6         5132       4256    -876 (-17.07%)         241         219    -22 (-9.13%)
bpf_overlay.o  tail_handle_nat_fwd_ipv4              20524      10114  -10410 (-50.72%)        1271         638  -633 (-49.80%)
bpf_overlay.o  tail_nodeport_nat_egress_ipv4         22718      19490   -3228 (-14.21%)        1475        1275  -200 (-13.56%)
bpf_overlay.o  tail_nodeport_nat_ingress_ipv4         5526       3534   -1992 (-36.05%)         366         243  -123 (-33.61%)
bpf_overlay.o  tail_nodeport_nat_ingress_ipv6         5132       4256    -876 (-17.07%)         241         219    -22 (-9.13%)
bpf_overlay.o  tail_nodeport_nat_ipv6_egress          3638       3548      -90 (-2.47%)         209         203     -6 (-2.87%)
bpf_overlay.o  tail_rev_nodeport_lb4                  4368       3820    -548 (-12.55%)         248         215   -33 (-13.31%)
bpf_overlay.o  tail_rev_nodeport_lb6                  2867       2428    -439 (-15.31%)         167         140   -27 (-16.17%)
bpf_sock.o     cil_sock6_connect                      1718       1703      -15 (-0.87%)         100          99     -1 (-1.00%)
bpf_xdp.o      tail_handle_nat_fwd_ipv4              12917      12443     -474 (-3.67%)         875         849    -26 (-2.97%)
bpf_xdp.o      tail_handle_nat_fwd_ipv6              13515      13264     -251 (-1.86%)         715         702    -13 (-1.82%)
bpf_xdp.o      tail_lb_ipv4                          39492      36367    -3125 (-7.91%)        2430        2251   -179 (-7.37%)
bpf_xdp.o      tail_lb_ipv6                          80441      78058    -2383 (-2.96%)        3647        3523   -124 (-3.40%)
bpf_xdp.o      tail_nodeport_ipv6_dsr                 1038        901    -137 (-13.20%)          61          55     -6 (-9.84%)
bpf_xdp.o      tail_nodeport_nat_egress_ipv4         13027      12096     -931 (-7.15%)         868         809    -59 (-6.80%)
bpf_xdp.o      tail_nodeport_nat_ingress_ipv4         7617       5900   -1717 (-22.54%)         522         413  -109 (-20.88%)
bpf_xdp.o      tail_nodeport_nat_ingress_ipv6         7575       7395     -180 (-2.38%)         383         374     -9 (-2.35%)
bpf_xdp.o      tail_rev_nodeport_lb4                  6808       6739      -69 (-1.01%)         403         396     -7 (-1.74%)
bpf_xdp.o      tail_rev_nodeport_lb6                 16173      15847     -326 (-2.02%)        1010         990    -20 (-1.98%)

Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231205184248.1502704-9-andrii@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2023-12-05 13:40:21 -08:00
Andrii Nakryiko
e322f0bcb8 bpf: preserve constant zero when doing partial register restore
Similar to special handling of STACK_ZERO, when reading 1/2/4 bytes from
stack from slot that has register spilled into it and that register has
a constant value zero, preserve that zero and mark spilled register as
precise for that. This makes spilled const zero register and STACK_ZERO
cases equivalent in their behavior.

Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231205184248.1502704-7-andrii@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2023-12-05 13:40:21 -08:00
Andrii Nakryiko
eaf18febd6 bpf: preserve STACK_ZERO slots on partial reg spills
Instead of always forcing STACK_ZERO slots to STACK_MISC, preserve it in
situations where this is possible. E.g., when spilling register as
1/2/4-byte subslots on the stack, all the remaining bytes in the stack
slot do not automatically become unknown. If we knew they contained
zeroes, we can preserve those STACK_ZERO markers.

Add a helper mark_stack_slot_misc(), similar to scrub_spilled_slot(),
but that doesn't overwrite either STACK_INVALID nor STACK_ZERO. Note
that we need to take into account possibility of being in unprivileged
mode, in which case STACK_INVALID is forced to STACK_MISC for correctness,
as treating STACK_INVALID as equivalent STACK_MISC is only enabled in
privileged mode.

Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231205184248.1502704-5-andrii@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2023-12-05 13:40:20 -08:00
Andrii Nakryiko
ab125ed3ec bpf: fix check for attempt to corrupt spilled pointer
When register is spilled onto a stack as a 1/2/4-byte register, we set
slot_type[BPF_REG_SIZE - 1] (plus potentially few more below it,
depending on actual spill size). So to check if some stack slot has
spilled register we need to consult slot_type[7], not slot_type[0].

To avoid the need to remember and double-check this in the future, just
use is_spilled_reg() helper.

Fixes: 27113c59b6 ("bpf: Check the other end of slot_type for STACK_SPILL")
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231205184248.1502704-4-andrii@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2023-12-05 13:40:20 -08:00
Andrii Nakryiko
41f6f64e69 bpf: support non-r10 register spill/fill to/from stack in precision tracking
Use instruction (jump) history to record instructions that performed
register spill/fill to/from stack, regardless if this was done through
read-only r10 register, or any other register after copying r10 into it
*and* potentially adjusting offset.

To make this work reliably, we push extra per-instruction flags into
instruction history, encoding stack slot index (spi) and stack frame
number in extra 10 bit flags we take away from prev_idx in instruction
history. We don't touch idx field for maximum performance, as it's
checked most frequently during backtracking.

This change removes basically the last remaining practical limitation of
precision backtracking logic in BPF verifier. It fixes known
deficiencies, but also opens up new opportunities to reduce number of
verified states, explored in the subsequent patches.

There are only three differences in selftests' BPF object files
according to veristat, all in the positive direction (less states).

File                                    Program        Insns (A)  Insns (B)  Insns  (DIFF)  States (A)  States (B)  States (DIFF)
--------------------------------------  -------------  ---------  ---------  -------------  ----------  ----------  -------------
test_cls_redirect_dynptr.bpf.linked3.o  cls_redirect        2987       2864  -123 (-4.12%)         240         231    -9 (-3.75%)
xdp_synproxy_kern.bpf.linked3.o         syncookie_tc       82848      82661  -187 (-0.23%)        5107        5073   -34 (-0.67%)
xdp_synproxy_kern.bpf.linked3.o         syncookie_xdp      85116      84964  -152 (-0.18%)        5162        5130   -32 (-0.62%)

Note, I avoided renaming jmp_history to more generic insn_hist to
minimize number of lines changed and potential merge conflicts between
bpf and bpf-next trees.

Notice also cur_hist_entry pointer reset to NULL at the beginning of
instruction verification loop. This pointer avoids the problem of
relying on last jump history entry's insn_idx to determine whether we
already have entry for current instruction or not. It can happen that we
added jump history entry because current instruction is_jmp_point(), but
also we need to add instruction flags for stack access. In this case, we
don't want to entries, so we need to reuse last added entry, if it is
present.

Relying on insn_idx comparison has the same ambiguity problem as the one
that was fixed recently in [0], so we avoid that.

  [0] https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/patch/20231110002638.4168352-3-andrii@kernel.org/

Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Reported-by: Tao Lyu <tao.lyu@epfl.ch>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231205184248.1502704-2-andrii@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2023-12-05 13:40:20 -08:00
Hou Tao
af66bfd3c8 bpf: Optimize the free of inner map
When removing the inner map from the outer map, the inner map will be
freed after one RCU grace period and one RCU tasks trace grace
period, so it is certain that the bpf program, which may access the
inner map, has exited before the inner map is freed.

However there is no need to wait for one RCU tasks trace grace period if
the outer map is only accessed by non-sleepable program. So adding
sleepable_refcnt in bpf_map and increasing sleepable_refcnt when adding
the outer map into env->used_maps for sleepable program. Although the
max number of bpf program is INT_MAX - 1, the number of bpf programs
which are being loaded may be greater than INT_MAX, so using atomic64_t
instead of atomic_t for sleepable_refcnt. When removing the inner map
from the outer map, using sleepable_refcnt to decide whether or not a
RCU tasks trace grace period is needed before freeing the inner map.

Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231204140425.1480317-6-houtao@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2023-12-04 17:50:26 -08:00
Hou Tao
8766733641 bpf: Defer the free of inner map when necessary
When updating or deleting an inner map in map array or map htab, the map
may still be accessed by non-sleepable program or sleepable program.
However bpf_map_fd_put_ptr() decreases the ref-counter of the inner map
directly through bpf_map_put(), if the ref-counter is the last one
(which is true for most cases), the inner map will be freed by
ops->map_free() in a kworker. But for now, most .map_free() callbacks
don't use synchronize_rcu() or its variants to wait for the elapse of a
RCU grace period, so after the invocation of ops->map_free completes,
the bpf program which is accessing the inner map may incur
use-after-free problem.

Fix the free of inner map by invoking bpf_map_free_deferred() after both
one RCU grace period and one tasks trace RCU grace period if the inner
map has been removed from the outer map before. The deferment is
accomplished by using call_rcu() or call_rcu_tasks_trace() when
releasing the last ref-counter of bpf map. The newly-added rcu_head
field in bpf_map shares the same storage space with work field to
reduce the size of bpf_map.

Fixes: bba1dc0b55 ("bpf: Remove redundant synchronize_rcu.")
Fixes: 638e4b825d ("bpf: Allows per-cpu maps and map-in-map in sleepable programs")
Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231204140425.1480317-5-houtao@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2023-12-04 17:50:26 -08:00
Hou Tao
79d93b3c6f bpf: Set need_defer as false when clearing fd array during map free
Both map deletion operation, map release and map free operation use
fd_array_map_delete_elem() to remove the element from fd array and
need_defer is always true in fd_array_map_delete_elem(). For the map
deletion operation and map release operation, need_defer=true is
necessary, because the bpf program, which accesses the element in fd
array, may still alive. However for map free operation, it is certain
that the bpf program which owns the fd array has already been exited, so
setting need_defer as false is appropriate for map free operation.

So fix it by adding need_defer parameter to bpf_fd_array_map_clear() and
adding a new helper __fd_array_map_delete_elem() to handle the map
deletion, map release and map free operations correspondingly.

Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231204140425.1480317-4-houtao@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2023-12-04 17:50:26 -08:00
Hou Tao
20c20bd11a bpf: Add map and need_defer parameters to .map_fd_put_ptr()
map is the pointer of outer map, and need_defer needs some explanation.
need_defer tells the implementation to defer the reference release of
the passed element and ensure that the element is still alive before
the bpf program, which may manipulate it, exits.

The following three cases will invoke map_fd_put_ptr() and different
need_defer values will be passed to these callers:

1) release the reference of the old element in the map during map update
   or map deletion. The release must be deferred, otherwise the bpf
   program may incur use-after-free problem, so need_defer needs to be
   true.
2) release the reference of the to-be-added element in the error path of
   map update. The to-be-added element is not visible to any bpf
   program, so it is OK to pass false for need_defer parameter.
3) release the references of all elements in the map during map release.
   Any bpf program which has access to the map must have been exited and
   released, so need_defer=false will be OK.

These two parameters will be used by the following patches to fix the
potential use-after-free problem for map-in-map.

Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231204140425.1480317-3-houtao@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2023-12-04 17:50:26 -08:00
Hou Tao
169410eba2 bpf: Check rcu_read_lock_trace_held() before calling bpf map helpers
These three bpf_map_{lookup,update,delete}_elem() helpers are also
available for sleepable bpf program, so add the corresponding lock
assertion for sleepable bpf program, otherwise the following warning
will be reported when a sleepable bpf program manipulates bpf map under
interpreter mode (aka bpf_jit_enable=0):

  WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 4985 at kernel/bpf/helpers.c:40 ......
  CPU: 3 PID: 4985 Comm: test_progs Not tainted 6.6.0+ #2
  Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996) ......
  RIP: 0010:bpf_map_lookup_elem+0x54/0x60
  ......
  Call Trace:
   <TASK>
   ? __warn+0xa5/0x240
   ? bpf_map_lookup_elem+0x54/0x60
   ? report_bug+0x1ba/0x1f0
   ? handle_bug+0x40/0x80
   ? exc_invalid_op+0x18/0x50
   ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x1b/0x20
   ? __pfx_bpf_map_lookup_elem+0x10/0x10
   ? rcu_lockdep_current_cpu_online+0x65/0xb0
   ? rcu_is_watching+0x23/0x50
   ? bpf_map_lookup_elem+0x54/0x60
   ? __pfx_bpf_map_lookup_elem+0x10/0x10
   ___bpf_prog_run+0x513/0x3b70
   __bpf_prog_run32+0x9d/0xd0
   ? __bpf_prog_enter_sleepable_recur+0xad/0x120
   ? __bpf_prog_enter_sleepable_recur+0x3e/0x120
   bpf_trampoline_6442580665+0x4d/0x1000
   __x64_sys_getpgid+0x5/0x30
   ? do_syscall_64+0x36/0xb0
   entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6e/0x76
   </TASK>

Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231204140425.1480317-2-houtao@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2023-12-04 17:50:26 -08:00
Andrei Matei
5bd90cdc65 bpf: Minor logging improvement
One place where we were logging a register was only logging the variable
part, not also the fixed part.

Signed-off-by: Andrei Matei <andreimatei1@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20231204011248.2040084-1-andreimatei1@gmail.com
2023-12-04 15:57:27 +01:00
Andrii Nakryiko
81eff2e364 bpf: simplify tnum output if a fully known constant
Emit tnum representation as just a constant if all bits are known.
Use decimal-vs-hex logic to determine exact format of emitted
constant value, just like it's done for register range values.
For that move tnum_strn() to kernel/bpf/log.c to reuse decimal-vs-hex
determination logic and constants.

Acked-by: Shung-Hsi Yu <shung-hsi.yu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231202175705.885270-12-andrii@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2023-12-02 11:36:51 -08:00
Andrii Nakryiko
eabe518de5 bpf: enforce precision of R0 on program/async callback return
Given we enforce a valid range for program and async callback return
value, we must mark R0 as precise to avoid incorrect state pruning.

Fixes: b5dc0163d8 ("bpf: precise scalar_value tracking")
Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231202175705.885270-9-andrii@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2023-12-02 11:36:51 -08:00
Andrii Nakryiko
0ef24c8dfa bpf: unify async callback and program retval checks
Use common logic to verify program return values and async callback
return values. This allows to avoid duplication of any extra steps
necessary, like precision marking, which will be added in the next
patch.

Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Shung-Hsi Yu <shung-hsi.yu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231202175705.885270-8-andrii@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2023-12-02 11:36:50 -08:00
Andrii Nakryiko
c871d0e00f bpf: enforce precise retval range on program exit
Similarly to subprog/callback logic, enforce return value of BPF program
using more precise smin/smax range.

We need to adjust a bunch of tests due to a changed format of an error
message.

Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Shung-Hsi Yu <shung-hsi.yu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231202175705.885270-7-andrii@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2023-12-02 11:36:50 -08:00
Andrii Nakryiko
8fa4ecd49b bpf: enforce exact retval range on subprog/callback exit
Instead of relying on potentially imprecise tnum representation of
expected return value range for callbacks and subprogs, validate that
smin/smax range satisfy exact expected range of return values.

E.g., if callback would need to return [0, 2] range, tnum can't
represent this precisely and instead will allow [0, 3] range. By
checking smin/smax range, we can make sure that subprog/callback indeed
returns only valid [0, 2] range.

Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Shung-Hsi Yu <shung-hsi.yu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231202175705.885270-5-andrii@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2023-12-02 11:36:50 -08:00
Andrii Nakryiko
0acd03a5bd bpf: enforce precision of R0 on callback return
Given verifier checks actual value, r0 has to be precise, so we need to
propagate precision properly. r0 also has to be marked as read,
otherwise subsequent state comparisons will ignore such register as
unimportant and precision won't really help here.

Fixes: 69c087ba62 ("bpf: Add bpf_for_each_map_elem() helper")
Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Shung-Hsi Yu <shung-hsi.yu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231202175705.885270-4-andrii@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2023-12-02 11:36:50 -08:00
Andrii Nakryiko
5fad52bee3 bpf: provide correct register name for exception callback retval check
bpf_throw() is checking R1, so let's report R1 in the log.

Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Shung-Hsi Yu <shung-hsi.yu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231202175705.885270-3-andrii@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2023-12-02 11:36:50 -08:00
Yonghong Song
dfce9cb314 bpf: Fix a verifier bug due to incorrect branch offset comparison with cpu=v4
Bpf cpu=v4 support is introduced in [1] and Commit 4cd58e9af8
("bpf: Support new 32bit offset jmp instruction") added support for new
32bit offset jmp instruction. Unfortunately, in function
bpf_adj_delta_to_off(), for new branch insn with 32bit offset, the offset
(plus/minor a small delta) compares to 16-bit offset bound
[S16_MIN, S16_MAX], which caused the following verification failure:
  $ ./test_progs-cpuv4 -t verif_scale_pyperf180
  ...
  insn 10 cannot be patched due to 16-bit range
  ...
  libbpf: failed to load object 'pyperf180.bpf.o'
  scale_test:FAIL:expect_success unexpected error: -12 (errno 12)
  #405     verif_scale_pyperf180:FAIL

Note that due to recent llvm18 development, the patch [2] (already applied
in bpf-next) needs to be applied to bpf tree for testing purpose.

The fix is rather simple. For 32bit offset branch insn, the adjusted
offset compares to [S32_MIN, S32_MAX] and then verification succeeded.

  [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230728011143.3710005-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev
  [2] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20231110193644.3130906-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev

Fixes: 4cd58e9af8 ("bpf: Support new 32bit offset jmp instruction")
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20231201024640.3417057-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev
2023-12-01 15:41:50 -08:00
Jakub Kicinski
753c8608f3 bpf-next-for-netdev
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
 
 iHUEABYIAB0WIQTFp0I1jqZrAX+hPRXbK58LschIgwUCZWiCPAAKCRDbK58LschI
 g4djAQC1FdqCRIFkhbiIRNHTgHjnfQShELQbd9ofJqzylLqmmgD+JI1E7D9SXagm
 pIXQ26EGmq8/VcCT3VLncA8EsC76Gg4=
 =Xowm
 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Merge tag 'for-netdev' of https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next

Daniel Borkmann says:

====================
pull-request: bpf-next 2023-11-30

We've added 30 non-merge commits during the last 7 day(s) which contain
a total of 58 files changed, 1598 insertions(+), 154 deletions(-).

The main changes are:

1) Add initial TX metadata implementation for AF_XDP with support in mlx5
   and stmmac drivers. Two types of offloads are supported right now, that
   is, TX timestamp and TX checksum offload, from Stanislav Fomichev with
   stmmac implementation from Song Yoong Siang.

2) Change BPF verifier logic to validate global subprograms lazily instead
   of unconditionally before the main program, so they can be guarded using
   BPF CO-RE techniques, from Andrii Nakryiko.

3) Add BPF link_info support for uprobe multi link along with bpftool
   integration for the latter, from Jiri Olsa.

4) Use pkg-config in BPF selftests to determine ld flags which is
   in particular needed for linking statically, from Akihiko Odaki.

5) Fix a few BPF selftest failures to adapt to the upcoming LLVM18,
   from Yonghong Song.

* tag 'for-netdev' of https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next: (30 commits)
  bpf/tests: Remove duplicate JSGT tests
  selftests/bpf: Add TX side to xdp_hw_metadata
  selftests/bpf: Convert xdp_hw_metadata to XDP_USE_NEED_WAKEUP
  selftests/bpf: Add TX side to xdp_metadata
  selftests/bpf: Add csum helpers
  selftests/xsk: Support tx_metadata_len
  xsk: Add option to calculate TX checksum in SW
  xsk: Validate xsk_tx_metadata flags
  xsk: Document tx_metadata_len layout
  net: stmmac: Add Tx HWTS support to XDP ZC
  net/mlx5e: Implement AF_XDP TX timestamp and checksum offload
  tools: ynl: Print xsk-features from the sample
  xsk: Add TX timestamp and TX checksum offload support
  xsk: Support tx_metadata_len
  selftests/bpf: Use pkg-config for libelf
  selftests/bpf: Override PKG_CONFIG for static builds
  selftests/bpf: Choose pkg-config for the target
  bpftool: Add support to display uprobe_multi links
  selftests/bpf: Add link_info test for uprobe_multi link
  selftests/bpf: Use bpf_link__destroy in fill_link_info tests
  ...
====================

Conflicts:

Documentation/netlink/specs/netdev.yaml:
  839ff60df3 ("net: page_pool: add nlspec for basic access to page pools")
  48eb03dd26 ("xsk: Add TX timestamp and TX checksum offload support")
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20231201094705.1ee3cab8@canb.auug.org.au/

While at it also regen, tree is dirty after:
  48eb03dd26 ("xsk: Add TX timestamp and TX checksum offload support")
looks like code wasn't re-rendered after "render-max" was removed.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231130145708.32573-1-daniel@iogearbox.net
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
2023-11-30 16:58:42 -08:00
Jakub Kicinski
975f2d73a9 Merge git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/netdev/net
Cross-merge networking fixes after downstream PR.

No conflicts.

Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
2023-11-30 16:11:19 -08:00
Hou Tao
75a442581d bpf: Add missed allocation hint for bpf_mem_cache_alloc_flags()
bpf_mem_cache_alloc_flags() may call __alloc() directly when there is no
free object in free list, but it doesn't initialize the allocation hint
for the returned pointer. It may lead to bad memory dereference when
freeing the pointer, so fix it by initializing the allocation hint.

Fixes: 822fb26bdb ("bpf: Add a hint to allocated objects.")
Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231111043821.2258513-1-houtao@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2023-11-26 18:00:26 -08:00
Andrii Nakryiko
2afae08c9d bpf: Validate global subprogs lazily
Slightly change BPF verifier logic around eagerness and order of global
subprog validation. Instead of going over every global subprog eagerly
and validating it before main (entry) BPF program is verified, turn it
around. Validate main program first, mark subprogs that were called from
main program for later verification, but otherwise assume it is valid.
Afterwards, go over marked global subprogs and validate those,
potentially marking some more global functions as being called. Continue
this process until all (transitively) callable global subprogs are
validated. It's a BFS traversal at its heart and will always converge.

This is an important change because it allows to feature-gate some
subprograms that might not be verifiable on some older kernel, depending
on supported set of features.

E.g., at some point, global functions were allowed to accept a pointer
to memory, which size is identified by user-provided type.
Unfortunately, older kernels don't support this feature. With BPF CO-RE
approach, the natural way would be to still compile BPF object file once
and guard calls to this global subprog with some CO-RE check or using
.rodata variables. That's what people do to guard usage of new helpers
or kfuncs, and any other new BPF-side feature that might be missing on
old kernels.

That's currently impossible to do with global subprogs, unfortunately,
because they are eagerly and unconditionally validated. This patch set
aims to change this, so that in the future when global funcs gain new
features, those can be guarded using BPF CO-RE techniques in the same
fashion as any other new kernel feature.

Two selftests had to be adjusted in sync with these changes.

test_global_func12 relied on eager global subprog validation failing
before main program failure is detected (unknown return value). Fix by
making sure that main program is always valid.

verifier_subprog_precision's parent_stack_slot_precise subtest relied on
verifier checkpointing heuristic to do a checkpoint at instruction #5,
but that's no longer true because we don't have enough jumps validated
before reaching insn #5 due to global subprogs being validated later.

Other than that, no changes, as one would expect.

Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20231124035937.403208-3-andrii@kernel.org
2023-11-24 10:40:06 +01:00
Andrii Nakryiko
491dd8edec bpf: Emit global subprog name in verifier logs
We have the name, instead of emitting just func#N to identify global
subprog, augment verifier log messages with actual function name to make
it more user-friendly.

Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20231124035937.403208-2-andrii@kernel.org
2023-11-24 10:40:06 +01:00
Jakub Kicinski
45c226dde7 Merge git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/netdev/net
Cross-merge networking fixes after downstream PR.

Conflicts:

drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_main.c
  c9663f79cd ("ice: adjust switchdev rebuild path")
  7758017911 ("ice: restore timestamp configuration after device reset")
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20231121211259.3348630-1-anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com/

Adjacent changes:

kernel/bpf/verifier.c
  bb124da69c ("bpf: keep track of max number of bpf_loop callback iterations")
  5f99f312bd ("bpf: add register bounds sanity checks and sanitization")

Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
2023-11-23 12:20:58 -08:00
Jakub Kicinski
53475287da bpf-next-for-netdev
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
 
 iHUEABYIAB0WIQTFp0I1jqZrAX+hPRXbK58LschIgwUCZV0kjgAKCRDbK58LschI
 gy0EAP9XwncW2OhO72DpITluFzvWPgB0N97OANKBXjzKJrRAlQD/aUe9nlvBQuad
 WsbMKLeC4wvI2X/4PEIR4ukbuZ3ypAA=
 =LMVg
 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Merge tag 'for-netdev' of https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next

Daniel Borkmann says:

====================
pull-request: bpf-next 2023-11-21

We've added 85 non-merge commits during the last 12 day(s) which contain
a total of 63 files changed, 4464 insertions(+), 1484 deletions(-).

The main changes are:

1) Huge batch of verifier changes to improve BPF register bounds logic
   and range support along with a large test suite, and verifier log
   improvements, all from Andrii Nakryiko.

2) Add a new kfunc which acquires the associated cgroup of a task within
   a specific cgroup v1 hierarchy where the latter is identified by its id,
   from Yafang Shao.

3) Extend verifier to allow bpf_refcount_acquire() of a map value field
   obtained via direct load which is a use-case needed in sched_ext,
   from Dave Marchevsky.

4) Fix bpf_get_task_stack() helper to add the correct crosstask check
   for the get_perf_callchain(), from Jordan Rome.

5) Fix BPF task_iter internals where lockless usage of next_thread()
   was wrong. The rework also simplifies the code, from Oleg Nesterov.

6) Fix uninitialized tail padding via LIBBPF_OPTS_RESET, and another
   fix for certain BPF UAPI structs to fix verifier failures seen
   in bpf_dynptr usage, from Yonghong Song.

7) Add BPF selftest fixes for map_percpu_stats flakes due to per-CPU BPF
   memory allocator not being able to allocate per-CPU pointer successfully,
   from Hou Tao.

8) Add prep work around dynptr and string handling for kfuncs which
   is later going to be used by file verification via BPF LSM and fsverity,
   from Song Liu.

9) Improve BPF selftests to update multiple prog_tests to use ASSERT_*
   macros, from Yuran Pereira.

10) Optimize LPM trie lookup to check prefixlen before walking the trie,
    from Florian Lehner.

11) Consolidate virtio/9p configs from BPF selftests in config.vm file
    given they are needed consistently across archs, from Manu Bretelle.

12) Small BPF verifier refactor to remove register_is_const(),
    from Shung-Hsi Yu.

* tag 'for-netdev' of https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next: (85 commits)
  selftests/bpf: Replaces the usage of CHECK calls for ASSERTs in vmlinux
  selftests/bpf: Replaces the usage of CHECK calls for ASSERTs in bpf_obj_id
  selftests/bpf: Replaces the usage of CHECK calls for ASSERTs in bind_perm
  selftests/bpf: Replaces the usage of CHECK calls for ASSERTs in bpf_tcp_ca
  selftests/bpf: reduce verboseness of reg_bounds selftest logs
  bpf: bpf_iter_task_next: use next_task(kit->task) rather than next_task(kit->pos)
  bpf: bpf_iter_task_next: use __next_thread() rather than next_thread()
  bpf: task_group_seq_get_next: use __next_thread() rather than next_thread()
  bpf: emit frameno for PTR_TO_STACK regs if it differs from current one
  bpf: smarter verifier log number printing logic
  bpf: omit default off=0 and imm=0 in register state log
  bpf: emit map name in register state if applicable and available
  bpf: print spilled register state in stack slot
  bpf: extract register state printing
  bpf: move verifier state printing code to kernel/bpf/log.c
  bpf: move verbose_linfo() into kernel/bpf/log.c
  bpf: rename BPF_F_TEST_SANITY_STRICT to BPF_F_TEST_REG_INVARIANTS
  bpf: Remove test for MOVSX32 with offset=32
  selftests/bpf: add iter test requiring range x range logic
  veristat: add ability to set BPF_F_TEST_SANITY_STRICT flag with -r flag
  ...
====================

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231122000500.28126-1-daniel@iogearbox.net
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
2023-11-21 17:53:20 -08:00
Eduard Zingerman
bb124da69c bpf: keep track of max number of bpf_loop callback iterations
In some cases verifier can't infer convergence of the bpf_loop()
iteration. E.g. for the following program:

    static int cb(__u32 idx, struct num_context* ctx)
    {
        ctx->i++;
        return 0;
    }

    SEC("?raw_tp")
    int prog(void *_)
    {
        struct num_context ctx = { .i = 0 };
        __u8 choice_arr[2] = { 0, 1 };

        bpf_loop(2, cb, &ctx, 0);
        return choice_arr[ctx.i];
    }

Each 'cb' simulation would eventually return to 'prog' and reach
'return choice_arr[ctx.i]' statement. At which point ctx.i would be
marked precise, thus forcing verifier to track multitude of separate
states with {.i=0}, {.i=1}, ... at bpf_loop() callback entry.

This commit allows "brute force" handling for such cases by limiting
number of callback body simulations using 'umax' value of the first
bpf_loop() parameter.

For this, extend bpf_func_state with 'callback_depth' field.
Increment this field when callback visiting state is pushed to states
traversal stack. For frame #N it's 'callback_depth' field counts how
many times callback with frame depth N+1 had been executed.
Use bpf_func_state specifically to allow independent tracking of
callback depths when multiple nested bpf_loop() calls are present.

Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231121020701.26440-11-eddyz87@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2023-11-20 18:36:40 -08:00
Eduard Zingerman
cafe2c2150 bpf: widening for callback iterators
Callbacks are similar to open coded iterators, so add imprecise
widening logic for callback body processing. This makes callback based
loops behave identically to open coded iterators, e.g. allowing to
verify programs like below:

  struct ctx { u32 i; };
  int cb(u32 idx, struct ctx* ctx)
  {
          ++ctx->i;
          return 0;
  }
  ...
  struct ctx ctx = { .i = 0 };
  bpf_loop(100, cb, &ctx, 0);
  ...

Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231121020701.26440-9-eddyz87@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2023-11-20 18:36:40 -08:00
Eduard Zingerman
ab5cfac139 bpf: verify callbacks as if they are called unknown number of times
Prior to this patch callbacks were handled as regular function calls,
execution of callback body was modeled exactly once.
This patch updates callbacks handling logic as follows:
- introduces a function push_callback_call() that schedules callback
  body verification in env->head stack;
- updates prepare_func_exit() to reschedule callback body verification
  upon BPF_EXIT;
- as calls to bpf_*_iter_next(), calls to callback invoking functions
  are marked as checkpoints;
- is_state_visited() is updated to stop callback based iteration when
  some identical parent state is found.

Paths with callback function invoked zero times are now verified first,
which leads to necessity to modify some selftests:
- the following negative tests required adding release/unlock/drop
  calls to avoid previously masked unrelated error reports:
  - cb_refs.c:underflow_prog
  - exceptions_fail.c:reject_rbtree_add_throw
  - exceptions_fail.c:reject_with_cp_reference
- the following precision tracking selftests needed change in expected
  log trace:
  - verifier_subprog_precision.c:callback_result_precise
    (note: r0 precision is no longer propagated inside callback and
           I think this is a correct behavior)
  - verifier_subprog_precision.c:parent_callee_saved_reg_precise_with_callback
  - verifier_subprog_precision.c:parent_stack_slot_precise_with_callback

Reported-by: Andrew Werner <awerner32@gmail.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/CA+vRuzPChFNXmouzGG+wsy=6eMcfr1mFG0F3g7rbg-sedGKW3w@mail.gmail.com/
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231121020701.26440-7-eddyz87@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2023-11-20 18:35:44 -08:00
Eduard Zingerman
58124a98cb bpf: extract setup_func_entry() utility function
Move code for simulated stack frame creation to a separate utility
function. This function would be used in the follow-up change for
callbacks handling.

Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231121020701.26440-6-eddyz87@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2023-11-20 18:33:35 -08:00
Eduard Zingerman
683b96f960 bpf: extract __check_reg_arg() utility function
Split check_reg_arg() into two utility functions:
- check_reg_arg() operating on registers from current verifier state;
- __check_reg_arg() operating on a specific set of registers passed as
  a parameter;

The __check_reg_arg() function would be used by a follow-up change for
callbacks handling.

Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231121020701.26440-5-eddyz87@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2023-11-20 18:33:35 -08:00
Oleg Nesterov
ac8148d957 bpf: bpf_iter_task_next: use next_task(kit->task) rather than next_task(kit->pos)
This looks more clear and simplifies the code. While at it, remove the
unnecessary initialization of pos/task at the start of bpf_iter_task_new().

Note that we can even kill kit->task, we can just use pos->group_leader,
but I don't understand the BUILD_BUG_ON() checks in bpf_iter_task_new().

Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231114163239.GA903@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2023-11-19 11:43:44 -08:00