With cache_trim_mode on, reclaim logic doesn't bother reclaiming anon
pages. However, it should be more careful to use the mode because it's
going to prevent anon pages from being reclaimed even if there are a huge
number of anon pages that are cold and should be reclaimed. Even worse,
that leads kswapd_failures to reach MAX_RECLAIM_RETRIES and stopping
kswapd from functioning until direct reclaim eventually works to resume
kswapd.
So kswapd needs to retry its scan priority loop with cache_trim_mode off
again if the mode doesn't work for reclaim.
The problematic behavior can be reproduced by:
CONFIG_NUMA_BALANCING enabled
sysctl_numa_balancing_mode set to NUMA_BALANCING_MEMORY_TIERING
numa node0 (8GB local memory, 16 CPUs)
numa node1 (8GB slow tier memory, no CPUs)
Sequence:
1) echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches
2) To emulate the system with full of cold memory in local DRAM, run
the following dummy program and never touch the region:
mmap(0, 8 * 1024 * 1024 * 1024, PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE,
MAP_ANONYMOUS | MAP_PRIVATE | MAP_POPULATE, -1, 0);
3) Run any memory intensive work e.g. XSBench.
4) Check if numa balancing is working e.i. promotion/demotion.
5) Iterate 1) ~ 4) until numa balancing stops.
With this, you could see that promotion/demotion are not working because
kswapd has stopped due to ->kswapd_failures >= MAX_RECLAIM_RETRIES.
Interesting vmstat delta's differences between before and after are like:
+-----------------------+-------------------------------+
| interesting vmstat | before | after |
+-----------------------+-------------------------------+
| nr_inactive_anon | 321935 | 1664772 |
| nr_active_anon | 1780700 | 437834 |
| nr_inactive_file | 30425 | 40882 |
| nr_active_file | 14961 | 3012 |
| pgpromote_success | 356 | 1293122 |
| pgpromote_candidate | 21953245 | 1824148 |
| pgactivate | 1844523 | 3311907 |
| pgdeactivate | 50634 | 1554069 |
| pgfault | 31100294 | 6518806 |
| pgdemote_kswapd | 30856 | 2230821 |
| pgscan_kswapd | 1861981 | 7667629 |
| pgscan_anon | 1822930 | 7610583 |
| pgscan_file | 39051 | 57046 |
| pgsteal_anon | 386 | 2192033 |
| pgsteal_file | 30470 | 38788 |
| pageoutrun | 30 | 412 |
| numa_hint_faults | 27418279 | 2875955 |
| numa_pages_migrated | 356 | 1293122 |
+-----------------------+-------------------------------+
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240304082118.20499-1-byungchul@sk.com
Signed-off-by: Byungchul Park <byungchul@sk.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Users of UFFDIO_CONTINUE may reasonably assume that a write memory barrier
is included as part of UFFDIO_CONTINUE. That is, a user may believe that
all writes it has done to a page that it is now UFFDIO_CONTINUE'ing are
guaranteed to be visible to anyone subsequently reading the page through
the newly mapped virtual memory region.
Today, such a user happens to be correct. mmget_not_zero(), for example,
is called as part of UFFDIO_CONTINUE (and comes before any PTE updates),
and it implicitly gives us a write barrier.
To be resilient against future changes, include an explicit smp_wmb().
While we're at it, optimize the smp_wmb() that is already incidentally
present for the HugeTLB case.
Merely making a syscall does not generally imply the memory ordering
constraints that we need (including on x86).
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240307010250.3847179-1-jthoughton@google.com
Signed-off-by: James Houghton <jthoughton@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Cc: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com>
Cc: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
My recent change to put_pages_list() dereferences folio->lru.next after
returning the folio to the page allocator. Usually this is now on the pcp
list with other free folios, so we try to free an already-free folio.
This only happens with lists that have more than 15 entries, so it wasn't
immediately discovered. Revert to using list_for_each_safe() so we
dereference lru.next before disposing of the folio.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240306212749.1823380-1-willy@infradead.org
Fixes: 24835f899c ("mm: use free_unref_folios() in put_pages_list()")
Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
Reported-by: "Borah, Chaitanya Kumar" <chaitanya.kumar.borah@intel.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/intel-gfx/SJ1PR11MB61292145F3B79DA58ADDDA63B9232@SJ1PR11MB6129.namprd11.prod.outlook.com/
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
When freeing a large folio, we must remove it from the deferred split list
before we uncharge it as each memcg has its own deferred split list (with
associated lock) and removing a folio from the deferred split list while
holding the wrong lock will corrupt that list and cause various related
problems.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/367a14f7-340e-4b29-90ae-bc3fcefdd5f4@arm.com/
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240311191835.312162-1-willy@infradead.org
Fixes: f77171d241 (mm: allow non-hugetlb large folios to be batch processed)
Fixes: 29f3843026 (mm: free folios directly in move_folios_to_lru())
Fixes: bc2ff4cbc3 (mm: free folios in a batch in shrink_folio_list())
Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
Debugged-by: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>
Tested-by: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
A major fault occurred when using mlockall(MCL_CURRENT | MCL_FUTURE) in
application, which leading to an unexpected issue[1].
This is caused by temporarily cleared PTE during a read+clear/modify/write
update of the PTE, eg, do_numa_page()/change_pte_range().
For the data segment of the user-mode program, the global variable area is
a private mapping. After the pagecache is loaded, the private anonymous
page is generated after the COW is triggered. Mlockall can lock COW pages
(anonymous pages), but the original file pages cannot be locked and may be
reclaimed. If the global variable (private anon page) is accessed when
vmf->pte is zeroed in numa fault, a file page fault will be triggered. At
this time, the original private file page may have been reclaimed. If the
page cache is not available at this time, a major fault will be triggered
and the file will be read, causing additional overhead.
This issue affects our traffic analysis service. The inbound traffic is
heavy. If a major fault occurs, the I/O schedule is triggered and the
original I/O is suspended. Generally, the I/O schedule is 0.7 ms. If
other applications are operating disks, the system needs to wait for more
than 10 ms. However, the inbound traffic is heavy and the NIC buffer is
small. As a result, packet loss occurs. But the traffic analysis service
can't tolerate packet loss.
Fix this by holding PTL and rechecking the PTE in filemap_fault() before
triggering a major fault. We do this check only if vma is VM_LOCKED to
reduce the performance impact in common scenarios.
In our product environment, there were 7 major faults every 12 hours.
After the patch is applied, no major fault have been triggered.
Testing file page read and write page fault performance in ext4 and
ramdisk using will-it-scale[2] on a x86 physical machine. The data is the
average change compared with the mainline after the patch is applied. The
test results are within the range of fluctuation. We do this check only
if vma is VM_LOCKED, therefore, no performance regressions is caused for
most common cases.
The test results are as follows:
processes processes_idle threads threads_idle
ext4 private file write: 0.22% 0.26% 1.21% -0.15%
ext4 private file read: 0.03% 1.00% 1.39% 0.34%
ext4 shared file write: -0.50% -0.02% -0.14% -0.02%
ramdisk private file write: 0.07% 0.02% 0.53% 0.04%
ramdisk private file read: 0.01% 1.60% -0.32% -0.02%
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/9e62fd9a-bee0-52bf-50a7-498fa17434ee@huawei.com/
[2] https://github.com/antonblanchard/will-it-scale/
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240306083809.1236634-1-zhangpeng362@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: ZhangPeng <zhangpeng362@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
Suggested-by: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com>
Suggested-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
stackdepot only saves stack_records which size is greather than 0,
so we cannot possibly have empty stack_records.
Drop the check.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240306123217.29774-3-osalvador@suse.de
Signed-off-by: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Cc: Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>
Cc: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@gmail.com>
Cc: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>
Cc: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Patch series "page_owner: Fixup and cleanup".
This patchset consists of a fixup by an error that was reported by intel
robot, where it seems to be that by the time page_owner gets initialized,
stackdepot has already depleted its allocation space and returns
0-handles, turning that into null stack_records when trying to retrieve
the stack_record. I was not able to reproduce that from the config
because it booted fine for me, but when setting e.g: dummy_handle to 0
artificially, I could see the same error that was reported.
The second patch is a cleanup that can also lead to a compilation warning.
This patch (of 2):
Although the retrieval of the stack_records for {dummy,failure}_handle
happen when page_owner gets initialized, there seems to be some situations
where stackdepot space has been already depleted by then, so we get
0-handles which make stack_records being NULL for those cases.
Be careful to 1) only bump stack_records refcount and 2) only access
stack_record fields if we actually have a non-null stack_record between
hands.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240306123217.29774-1-osalvador@suse.de
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240306123217.29774-2-osalvador@suse.de
Fixes: 4bedfb314b ("mm,page_owner: implement the tracking of the stacks count")
Signed-off-by: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
Reported-by: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-lkp/202403051032.e2f865a-lkp@intel.com
Cc: Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>
Cc: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@gmail.com>
Cc: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
There was previously a theoretical window where swapoff() could run and
teardown a swap_info_struct while a call to free_swap_and_cache() was
running in another thread. This could cause, amongst other bad
possibilities, swap_page_trans_huge_swapped() (called by
free_swap_and_cache()) to access the freed memory for swap_map.
This is a theoretical problem and I haven't been able to provoke it from a
test case. But there has been agreement based on code review that this is
possible (see link below).
Fix it by using get_swap_device()/put_swap_device(), which will stall
swapoff(). There was an extra check in _swap_info_get() to confirm that
the swap entry was not free. This isn't present in get_swap_device()
because it doesn't make sense in general due to the race between getting
the reference and swapoff. So I've added an equivalent check directly in
free_swap_and_cache().
Details of how to provoke one possible issue (thanks to David Hildenbrand
for deriving this):
--8<-----
__swap_entry_free() might be the last user and result in
"count == SWAP_HAS_CACHE".
swapoff->try_to_unuse() will stop as soon as soon as si->inuse_pages==0.
So the question is: could someone reclaim the folio and turn
si->inuse_pages==0, before we completed swap_page_trans_huge_swapped().
Imagine the following: 2 MiB folio in the swapcache. Only 2 subpages are
still references by swap entries.
Process 1 still references subpage 0 via swap entry.
Process 2 still references subpage 1 via swap entry.
Process 1 quits. Calls free_swap_and_cache().
-> count == SWAP_HAS_CACHE
[then, preempted in the hypervisor etc.]
Process 2 quits. Calls free_swap_and_cache().
-> count == SWAP_HAS_CACHE
Process 2 goes ahead, passes swap_page_trans_huge_swapped(), and calls
__try_to_reclaim_swap().
__try_to_reclaim_swap()->folio_free_swap()->delete_from_swap_cache()->
put_swap_folio()->free_swap_slot()->swapcache_free_entries()->
swap_entry_free()->swap_range_free()->
...
WRITE_ONCE(si->inuse_pages, si->inuse_pages - nr_entries);
What stops swapoff to succeed after process 2 reclaimed the swap cache
but before process1 finished its call to swap_page_trans_huge_swapped()?
--8<-----
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240306140356.3974886-1-ryan.roberts@arm.com
Fixes: 7c00bafee8 ("mm/swap: free swap slots in batch")
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/65a66eb9-41f8-4790-8db2-0c70ea15979f@redhat.com/
Signed-off-by: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
There is an old trick in shadow_mapped() to use pXd_bad() to detect huge
pages. After commit 93fab1b22e ("mm: add generic p?d_leaf() macros") we
have a global API for huge mappings. Use that to replace the trick.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240305043750.93762-7-peterx@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Mike Rapoport (IBM) <rppt@kernel.org>
Cc: Andrey Ryabinin <ryabinin.a.a@gmail.com>
Cc: Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>
Cc: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@gmail.com>
Cc: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
Cc: Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@arm.com>
Cc: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@kernel.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill@shutemov.name>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>
Cc: "Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Commit bf9b7df23c ("mm/zswap: global lru and shrinker shared by all
zswap_pools") introduced a new lock to protect zswap_next_shrink, instead
of reusing zswap_pools_lock.
But the problem is that it's initialized only when zswap enabled, which
causes bug if zswap_memcg_offline_cleanup() called without zswap enabled.
Fix it by using DEFINE_SPINLOCK() to statically initialize them and define
them as multiple static variables to keep in consistent with the existing
global variables in zswap.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240305075345.1493214-1-chengming.zhou@linux.dev
Fixes: bf9b7df23c ("mm/zswap: global lru and shrinker shared by all zswap_pools")
Reported-by: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-lkp/202403051008.a8cf8a94-lkp@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Chengming Zhou <chengming.zhou@linux.dev>
Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Nhat Pham <nphamcs@gmail.com>
Cc: Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
The rounddown_pow_of_two(0) is undefined, so val = 0 is not allowed in the
fault_around_bytes_set(), and leads to shift-out-of-bounds,
UBSAN: shift-out-of-bounds in include/linux/log2.h:67:13
shift exponent 4294967295 is too large for 64-bit type 'long unsigned int'
CPU: 7 PID: 107 Comm: sh Not tainted 6.8.0-rc6-next-20240301 #294
Hardware name: QEMU QEMU Virtual Machine, BIOS 0.0.0 02/06/2015
Call trace:
dump_backtrace+0x94/0xec
show_stack+0x18/0x24
dump_stack_lvl+0x78/0x90
dump_stack+0x18/0x24
ubsan_epilogue+0x10/0x44
__ubsan_handle_shift_out_of_bounds+0x98/0x134
fault_around_bytes_set+0xa4/0xb0
simple_attr_write_xsigned.isra.0+0xe4/0x1ac
simple_attr_write+0x18/0x24
debugfs_attr_write+0x4c/0x98
vfs_write+0xd0/0x4b0
ksys_write+0x6c/0xfc
__arm64_sys_write+0x1c/0x28
invoke_syscall+0x44/0x104
el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0x40/0xe0
do_el0_svc+0x1c/0x28
el0_svc+0x34/0xdc
el0t_64_sync_handler+0xc0/0xc4
el0t_64_sync+0x190/0x194
---[ end trace ]---
Fix it by setting the minimum val to PAGE_SIZE.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240302064312.2358924-1-wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com
Fixes: 53d36a56d8 ("mm: prefer fault_around_pages to fault_around_bytes")
Signed-off-by: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
Reported-by: Yue Sun <samsun1006219@gmail.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAEkJfYPim6DQqW1GqCiHLdh2-eweqk1fGyXqs3JM+8e1qGge8w@mail.gmail.com/
Reviewed-by: Lorenzo Stoakes <lstoakes@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Fixes Coccinelle/coccicheck warning reported by do_div.cocci.
Compared to do_div(), div64_ul() does not implicitly cast the divisor and
does not unnecessarily calculate the remainder.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240228224911.1164-2-thorsten.blum@toblux.com
Signed-off-by: Thorsten Blum <thorsten.blum@toblux.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
We actually add folios to the pagelist already, but then work with them as
pages. Removes a call to compound_head() in PageKsm() and removes a
reference to page->index.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240229153015.1996829-1-willy@infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Gregory Price <gregory.price@memverge.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
madvise, mprotect and some others might need folio_pte_batch to check if a
range of PTEs are completely mapped to a large folio with contiguous
physical addresses. Let's make it available in mm/internal.h.
While at it, add proper kernel doc and sanity-check more input parameters
using two additional VM_WARN_ON_FOLIO().
[21cnbao@gmail.com: build fix]
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/CAGsJ_4wWzG-37D82vqP_zt+Fcbz+URVe5oXLBc4M5wbN8A_gpQ@mail.gmail.com
[david@redhat.com: improve the doc for the exported func]
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240227104201.337988-1-21cnbao@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Barry Song <v-songbaohua@oppo.com>
Suggested-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>
Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Lance Yang <ioworker0@gmail.com>
Cc: Yin Fengwei <fengwei.yin@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Constify the flag tests that aren't automatically generated and the tests
that look like flag tests but are more complicated.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240227192337.757313-8-willy@infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Now that __dump_page() takes a const argument, we can make dump_page()
take a const struct page too.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240227192337.757313-6-willy@infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Optimizing the initialization speed of 1G huge pages through
parallelization.
1G hugetlbs are allocated from bootmem, a process that is already very
fast and does not currently require optimization. Therefore, we focus on
parallelizing only the initialization phase in `gather_bootmem_prealloc`.
Here are some test results:
test case no patch(ms) patched(ms) saved
------------------- -------------- ------------- --------
256c2T(4 node) 1G 4745 2024 57.34%
128c1T(2 node) 1G 3358 1712 49.02%
12T 1G 77000 18300 76.23%
[akpm@linux-foundation.org: s/initialied/initialized/, per Alexey]
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240222140422.393911-9-gang.li@linux.dev
Signed-off-by: Gang Li <ligang.bdlg@bytedance.com>
Tested-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>
Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
Cc: Daniel Jordan <daniel.m.jordan@oracle.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Jane Chu <jane.chu@oracle.com>
Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Cc: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Cc: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
Cc: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
By distributing both the allocation and the initialization tasks across
multiple threads, the initialization of 2M hugetlb will be faster, thereby
improving the boot speed.
Here are some test results:
test case no patch(ms) patched(ms) saved
------------------- -------------- ------------- --------
256c2T(4 node) 2M 3336 1051 68.52%
128c1T(2 node) 2M 1943 716 63.15%
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240222140422.393911-8-gang.li@linux.dev
Signed-off-by: Gang Li <ligang.bdlg@bytedance.com>
Tested-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>
Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
Cc: Daniel Jordan <daniel.m.jordan@oracle.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Jane Chu <jane.chu@oracle.com>
Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Cc: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Cc: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
Cc: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
different nodes Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2024 22:04:17 +0800
When a group of tasks that access different nodes are scheduled on the
same node, they may encounter bandwidth bottlenecks and access latency.
Thus, numa_aware flag is introduced here, allowing tasks to be distributed
across different nodes to fully utilize the advantage of multi-node
systems.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240222140422.393911-5-gang.li@linux.dev
Signed-off-by: Gang Li <ligang.bdlg@bytedance.com>
Tested-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>
Reviewed-by: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
Cc: Daniel Jordan <daniel.m.jordan@oracle.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Jane Chu <jane.chu@oracle.com>
Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Cc: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Cc: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
With parallelization of hugetlb allocation across different threads, each
thread works on a differnet node to allocate pages from, instead of all
allocating from a common node h->next_nid_to_alloc. To address this, it's
necessary to assign a separate next_nid_to_alloc for each thread.
Consequently, the hstate_next_node_to_alloc and
for_each_node_mask_to_alloc have been modified to directly accept a
*next_nid_to_alloc parameter, ensuring thread-specific allocation and
avoiding concurrent access issues.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240222140422.393911-4-gang.li@linux.dev
Signed-off-by: Gang Li <ligang.bdlg@bytedance.com>
Tested-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>
Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
Cc: Daniel Jordan <daniel.m.jordan@oracle.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Jane Chu <jane.chu@oracle.com>
Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Cc: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Cc: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
1G and 2M huge pages have different allocation and initialization logic,
which leads to subtle differences in parallelization. Therefore, it is
appropriate to split hugetlb_hstate_alloc_pages into gigantic and
non-gigantic.
This patch has no functional changes.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240222140422.393911-3-gang.li@linux.dev
Signed-off-by: Gang Li <ligang.bdlg@bytedance.com>
Tested-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>
Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
Cc: Daniel Jordan <daniel.m.jordan@oracle.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Jane Chu <jane.chu@oracle.com>
Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Cc: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Cc: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Patch series "hugetlb: parallelize hugetlb page init on boot", v6.
Introduction
------------
Hugetlb initialization during boot takes up a considerable amount of time.
For instance, on a 2TB system, initializing 1,800 1GB huge pages takes
1-2 seconds out of 10 seconds. Initializing 11,776 1GB pages on a 12TB
Intel host takes more than 1 minute[1]. This is a noteworthy figure.
Inspired by [2] and [3], hugetlb initialization can also be accelerated
through parallelization. Kernel already has infrastructure like
padata_do_multithreaded, this patch uses it to achieve effective results
by minimal modifications.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/783f8bac-55b8-5b95-eb6a-11a583675000@google.com/
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20200527173608.2885243-1-daniel.m.jordan@oracle.com/
[3] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230906112605.2286994-1-usama.arif@bytedance.com/
[4] https://lore.kernel.org/all/76becfc1-e609-e3e8-2966-4053143170b6@google.com/
max_threads
-----------
This patch use `padata_do_multithreaded` like this:
```
job.max_threads = num_node_state(N_MEMORY) * multiplier;
padata_do_multithreaded(&job);
```
To fully utilize the CPU, the number of parallel threads needs to be
carefully considered. `max_threads = num_node_state(N_MEMORY)` does not
fully utilize the CPU, so we need to multiply it by a multiplier.
Tests below indicate that a multiplier of 2 significantly improves
performance, and although larger values also provide improvements, the
gains are marginal.
multiplier 1 2 3 4 5
------------ ------- ------- ------- ------- -------
256G 2node 358ms 215ms 157ms 134ms 126ms
2T 4node 979ms 679ms 543ms 489ms 481ms
50G 2node 71ms 44ms 37ms 30ms 31ms
Therefore, choosing 2 as the multiplier strikes a good balance between
enhancing parallel processing capabilities and maintaining efficient
resource management.
Test result
-----------
test case no patch(ms) patched(ms) saved
------------------- -------------- ------------- --------
256c2T(4 node) 1G 4745 2024 57.34%
128c1T(2 node) 1G 3358 1712 49.02%
12T 1G 77000 18300 76.23%
256c2T(4 node) 2M 3336 1051 68.52%
128c1T(2 node) 2M 1943 716 63.15%
This patch (of 8):
The readability of `hugetlb_hstate_alloc_pages` is poor. By cleaning the
code, its readability can be improved, facilitating future modifications.
This patch extracts two functions to reduce the complexity of
`hugetlb_hstate_alloc_pages` and has no functional changes.
- hugetlb_hstate_alloc_pages_node_specific() to handle iterates through
each online node and performs allocation if necessary.
- hugetlb_hstate_alloc_pages_report() report error during allocation.
And the value of h->max_huge_pages is updated accordingly.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240222140422.393911-1-gang.li@linux.dev
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240222140422.393911-2-gang.li@linux.dev
Signed-off-by: Gang Li <ligang.bdlg@bytedance.com>
Tested-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev>
Reviewed-by: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Daniel Jordan <daniel.m.jordan@oracle.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Jane Chu <jane.chu@oracle.com>
Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Cc: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Cc: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
We will save allocated tag in the object header to indicate that it's
allocated.
handle |= OBJ_ALLOCATED_TAG;
So the object header needs to reserve LSB for this tag bit.
But the handle itself doesn't need to reserve LSB to save tag, since it's
only used to find the position of object, by (pfn + obj_idx). So remove
LSB reserve from handle, one more bit can be used as obj_idx.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240228023854.3511239-1-chengming.zhou@linux.dev
Signed-off-by: Chengming Zhou <chengming.zhou@linux.dev>
Reviewed-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Nhat Pham <nphamcs@gmail.com>
Cc: Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
do_numa_page() is reading from the same page table entry, twice, while
holding the page table lock: once while checking that the pte hasn't
changed, and again in order to modify the pte.
Instead, just read the pte once, and save it in the same old_pte variable
that already exists. This has no effect on behavior, other than to
provide a tiny potential improvement to performance, by avoiding the
redundant memory read (which the compiler cannot elide, due to
READ_ONCE()).
Also improve the associated comments nearby.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240228034151.459370-1-jhubbard@nvidia.com
Signed-off-by: John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
alloc_contig_migrate_range has every information to be able to understand
big contiguous allocation latency. For example, how many pages are
migrated, how many times they were needed to unmap from page tables.
This patch adds the trace event to collect the allocation statistics. In
the field, it was quite useful to understand CMA allocation latency.
[akpm@linux-foundation.org: a/trace_mm_alloc_config_migrate_range_info_enabled/trace_mm_alloc_contig_migrate_range_info_enabled]
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240228051127.2859472-1-richardycc@google.com
Signed-off-by: Richard Chang <richardycc@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@goodmis.org.
Cc: Martin Liu <liumartin@google.com>
Cc: "Masami Hiramatsu (Google)" <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
We already have a folio; use it instead of the head page where reasonable.
Saves a couple of calls to compound_head() and elimimnates a few
references to page->mapping.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240228164326.1355045-1-willy@infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Sidhartha Kumar <sidhartha.kumar@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
All but one caller already has a folio, so convert
free_page_and_swap_cache() to have a folio and remove the call to
page_folio().
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240227174254.710559-19-willy@infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
These pages are all chained together through the lru list, so we know
they're folios. Use the folio APIs to save three hidden calls to
compound_head().
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240227174254.710559-18-willy@infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Cc: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Process the pages in batch-sized quantities instead of all-at-once.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240227174254.710559-17-willy@infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Cc: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
All callers now use free_unref_folios() so we can delete this function.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240227174254.710559-15-willy@infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
All users have been converted to mem_cgroup_uncharge_folios() so we can
remove this API.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240227174254.710559-14-willy@infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
The few folios which can't be moved to the LRU list (because their
refcount dropped to zero) used to be returned to the caller to dispose of.
Make this simpler to call by freeing the folios directly through
free_unref_folios().
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240227174254.710559-13-willy@infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Cc: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Use free_unref_page_batch() to free the folios. This may increase the
number of IPIs from calling try_to_unmap_flush() more often, but that's
going to be very workload-dependent. It may even reduce the number of
IPIs as we now batch-free large folios instead of freeing them one at a
time.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240227174254.710559-12-willy@infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Hugetlb folios still get special treatment, but normal large folios can
now be freed by free_unref_folios(). This should have a reasonable
performance impact, TBD.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240227174254.710559-11-willy@infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Call folio_undo_large_rmappable() if needed. free_unref_page_prepare()
destroys the ability to call folio_order(), so stash the order in
folio->private for the benefit of the second loop.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240227174254.710559-10-willy@infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Cc: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Pass a pointer to the lruvec so we can take advantage of the
folio_lruvec_relock_irqsave(). Adjust the calling convention of
folio_lruvec_relock_irqsave() to suit and add a page_cache_release()
wrapper.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240227174254.710559-9-willy@infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Cc: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Break up the list of folios into batches here so that the folios are more
likely to be cache hot when doing the rest of the processing.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240227174254.710559-8-willy@infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Cc: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Instead of putting the interesting folios on a list, delete the
uninteresting one from the folio_batch.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240227174254.710559-7-willy@infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Almost identical to mem_cgroup_uncharge_list(), except it takes a
folio_batch instead of a list_head.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240227174254.710559-6-willy@infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
There's no need to indirect through release_pages() and iterate over this
batch of folios an extra time; we can just use the batch that we have.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240227174254.710559-5-willy@infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Iterate over a folio_batch rather than a linked list. This is easier for
the CPU to prefetch and has a batch count naturally built in so we don't
need to track it. Again, this lowers the maximum lock hold time from
32 folios to 15, but I do not expect this to have a significant effect.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240227174254.710559-4-willy@infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Cc: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Most of its callees are not yet ready to accept a folio, but we know all
of the pages passed in are actually folios because they're linked through
->lru.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240227174254.710559-3-willy@infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Patch series "Rearrange batched folio freeing", v3.
Other than the obvious "remove calls to compound_head" changes, the
fundamental belief here is that iterating a linked list is much slower
than iterating an array (5-15x slower in my testing). There's also an
associated belief that since we iterate the batch of folios three times,
we do better when the array is small (ie 15 entries) than we do with a
batch that is hundreds of entries long, which only gives us the
opportunity for the first pages to fall out of cache by the time we get to
the end.
It is possible we should increase the size of folio_batch. Hopefully the
bots let us know if this introduces any performance regressions.
This patch (of 3):
By making release_pages() call folios_put(), we can get rid of the calls
to compound_head() for the callers that already know they have folios. We
can also get rid of the lock_batch tracking as we know the size of the
batch is limited by folio_batch. This does reduce the maximum number of
pages for which the lruvec lock is held, from SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX (32) to
PAGEVEC_SIZE (15). I do not expect this to make a significant difference,
but if it does, we can increase PAGEVEC_SIZE to 31.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240227174254.710559-1-willy@infradead.org
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240227174254.710559-2-willy@infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Cc: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Previously, we removed the mm from mm_slot and dropped mm_count
if the MMF_THP_DISABLE flag was set. However, we didn't re-add
the mm back after clearing the MMF_THP_DISABLE flag. Additionally,
We add a check for the MMF_THP_DISABLE flag in hugepage_vma_revalidate().
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240227035135.54593-1-ioworker0@gmail.com
Fixes: 879c6000e1 ("mm/khugepaged: bypassing unnecessary scans with MMF_DISABLE_THP check")
Signed-off-by: Lance Yang <ioworker0@gmail.com>
Suggested-by: Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
Cc: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Cc: Zach O'Keefe <zokeefe@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Patch series "mm: remove total_mapcount()", v2.
Let's remove the remaining user from mm/memfd.c so we can get rid of
total_mapcount().
This patch (of 2):
Both functions are the remaining users of total_mapcount(). Let's get rid
of the calls by converting the code to folios.
As it turns out, the code is unnecessarily complicated, especially:
1) We can query the number of pagecache references for a folio simply via
folio_nr_pages(). This will handle other folio sizes in the future
correctly.
2) The xas_set(xas, page->index + cache_count) call to increment the
iterator for large folios is not required. Remove it.
Further, simplify the XA_CHECK_SCHED check, counting each entry exactly
once.
Memfd pages can be swapped out when using shmem; leave xa_is_value()
checks in place.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240226141324.278526-1-david@redhat.com
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240226141324.278526-2-david@redhat.com
Co-developed-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
It is used to test split_huge_page_to_list_to_order for pagecache THPs.
Also add test cases for split_huge_page_to_list_to_order via both debugfs.
[ziy@nvidia.com: fix issue discovered with NFS]
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/262E4DAA-4A78-4328-B745-1355AE356A07@nvidia.com
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240226205534.1603748-9-zi.yan@sent.com
Signed-off-by: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Tested-by: Aishwarya TCV <aishwarya.tcv@arm.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>
Cc: "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: Michal Koutny <mkoutny@suse.com>
Cc: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>
Cc: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>
Cc: Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com>
Cc: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com>
Cc: Zach O'Keefe <zokeefe@google.com>
Cc: Aishwarya TCV <aishwarya.tcv@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To split a THP to any lower order pages, we need to reform THPs on
subpages at given order and add page refcount based on the new page order.
Also we need to reinitialize page_deferred_list after removing the page
from the split_queue, otherwise a subsequent split will see list
corruption when checking the page_deferred_list again.
Note: Anonymous order-1 folio is not supported because _deferred_list,
which is used by partially mapped folios, is stored in subpage 2 and an
order-1 folio only has subpage 0 and 1. File-backed order-1 folios are
fine, since they do not use _deferred_list.
[ziy@nvidia.com: fixup per discussion with Ryan]
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/494F48CD-1F0F-4CAD-884E-6D48F40AF990@nvidia.com
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240226205534.1603748-8-zi.yan@sent.com
Signed-off-by: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>
Cc: "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: Michal Koutny <mkoutny@suse.com>
Cc: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>
Cc: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>
Cc: Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com>
Cc: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com>
Cc: Zach O'Keefe <zokeefe@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
It adds a new_order parameter to set new page order in page owner. It
prepares for upcoming changes to support split huge page to any lower
order.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240226205534.1603748-7-zi.yan@sent.com
Signed-off-by: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>
Cc: "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: Michal Koutny <mkoutny@suse.com>
Cc: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>
Cc: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>
Cc: Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com>
Cc: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com>
Cc: Zach O'Keefe <zokeefe@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
It sets memcg information for the pages after the split. A new parameter
new_order is added to tell the order of subpages in the new page, always 0
for now. It prepares for upcoming changes to support split huge page to
any lower order.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240226205534.1603748-6-zi.yan@sent.com
Signed-off-by: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>
Cc: "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: Michal Koutny <mkoutny@suse.com>
Cc: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>
Cc: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>
Cc: Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com>
Cc: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com>
Cc: Zach O'Keefe <zokeefe@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
