Define a common COMMUNITY macro and supply a variant to it.
This removes some verbosity in macros.
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
* Add missing and remove unused headers in the pin control and GPIO drivers
* Revise the pin control and GPIO headers
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=gj0F
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Merge tag 'intel-pinctrl-v6.1-2' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/pinctrl/intel into devel
intel-pinctrl for v6.1-2
* Add missing and remove unused headers in the pin control and GPIO drivers
* Revise the pin control and GPIO headers
There is a few things done:
- include only the headers we are direct user of
- when pointer is in use, provide a forward declaration
- add missing headers
- group generic headers and subsystem headers
- sort each group alphabetically
While at it, fix some awkward indentations.
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Do not imply that some of the generic headers may be always included.
Instead, include explicitly what we are direct user of.
While at it, sort headers alphabetically.
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Do not imply that some of the generic headers may be always included.
Instead, include explicitly what we are direct user of.
While at it, sort headers alphabetically.
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Do not imply that some of the generic headers may be always included.
Instead, include explicitly what we are direct user of.
While at it, sort headers alphabetically.
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Do not imply that some of the generic headers may be always included.
Instead, include explicitly what we are direct user of.
While at it, sort headers alphabetically.
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Do not imply that some of the generic headers may be always included.
Instead, include explicitly what we are direct user of.
While at it, sort headers alphabetically.
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Do not imply that some of the generic headers may be always included.
Instead, include explicitly what we are direct user of.
While at it, sort headers alphabetically.
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Do not imply that some of the generic headers may be always included.
Instead, include explicitly what we are direct user of.
While at it, sort headers alphabetically.
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Do not imply that some of the generic headers may be always included.
Instead, include explicitly what we are direct user of.
While at it, sort headers alphabetically.
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Do not imply that some of the generic headers may be always included.
Instead, include explicitly what we are direct user of.
While at it, sort headers alphabetically.
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Do not imply that some of the generic headers may be always included.
Instead, include explicitly what we are direct user of.
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Do not imply that some of the generic headers may be always included.
Instead, include explicitly what we are direct user of.
While at it, sort headers alphabetically.
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Do not imply that some of the generic headers may be always included.
Instead, include explicitly what we are direct user of.
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Emil Renner Berthing <emil.renner.berthing@canonical.com>
Do not imply that some of the generic headers may be always included.
Instead, include explicitly what we are direct user of.
While at it, sort headers alphabetically.
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Patrice Chotard <patrice.chotard@foss.st.com>
Do not imply that some of the generic headers may be always included.
Instead, include explicitly what we are direct user of.
While at it, sort headers alphabetically.
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
Do not imply that some of the generic headers may be always included.
Instead, include explicitly what we are direct user of.
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Do not imply that some of the generic headers may be always included.
Instead, include explicitly what we are direct user of.
While at it, sort headers alphabetically.
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Do not imply that some of the generic headers may be always included.
Instead, include explicitly what we are direct user of.
While at it, sort headers alphabetically.
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
Do not imply that some of the generic headers may be always included.
Instead, include explicitly what we are direct user of.
While at it, sort headers alphabetically.
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
Acked-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
Do not imply that some of the generic headers may be always included.
Instead, include explicitly what we are direct user of.
While at it, sort headers alphabetically.
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Do not imply that some of the generic headers may be always included.
Instead, include explicitly what we are direct user of.
While at it, sort headers alphabetically.
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@microchip.com>
Do not imply that some of the generic headers may be always included.
Instead, include explicitly what we are direct user of.
While at it, sort headers alphabetically.
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Do not imply that some of the generic headers may be always included.
Instead, include explicitly what we are direct user of.
While at it, sort headers alphabetically.
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Do not imply that some of the generic headers may be always included.
Instead, include explicitly what we are direct user of.
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Do not imply that some of the generic headers may be always included.
Instead, include explicitly what we are direct user of.
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
Do not imply that some of the generic headers may be always included.
Instead, include explicitly what we are direct user of.
While at it, sort headers alphabetically.
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Do not imply that some of the generic headers may be always included.
Instead, include explicitly what we are direct user of.
While at it, sort headers alphabetically.
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.cirrus.com>
Do not imply that some of the generic headers may be always included.
Instead, include explicitly what we are direct user of.
While at it, sort headers alphabetically.
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Do not imply that some of the generic headers may be always included.
Instead, include explicitly what we are direct user of.
While at it, sort headers alphabetically.
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com>
Do not imply that some of the generic headers may be always included.
Instead, include explicitly what we are direct user of.
While at it, sort headers alphabetically.
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Cercueil <paul@crapouillou.net>
Do not imply that some of the generic headers may be always included.
Instead, include explicitly what we are direct user of.
While at it, sort headers alphabetically.
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Do not imply that some of the generic headers may be always included.
Instead, include explicitly what we are direct user of.
While at it, sort headers alphabetically.
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Do not imply that some of the generic headers may be always included.
Instead, include explicitly what we are direct user of.
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Do not imply that some of the generic headers may be always included.
Instead, include explicitly what we are direct user of.
While at it, sort headers alphabetically.
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Do not imply that some of the generic headers may be always included.
Instead, include explicitly what we are direct user of.
While at it, sort headers alphabetically.
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Do not imply that some of the generic headers may be always included.
Instead, include explicitly what we are direct user of.
While at it, sort headers alphabetically.
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Do not imply that some of the generic headers may be always included.
Instead, include explicitly what we are direct user of.
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>
Do not imply that some of the generic headers may be always included.
Instead, include explicitly what we are direct user of.
While at it, sort headers alphabetically.
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@microchip.com>
Do not imply that some of the generic headers may be always included.
Instead, include explicitly what we are direct user of.
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Do not imply that some of the generic headers may be always included.
Instead, include explicitly what we are direct user of.
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Do not imply that some of the generic headers may be always included.
Instead, include explicitly what we are direct user of.
While at it, sort headers alphabetically.
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
sdm670_reserved_gpios is only used in pinctrl-sdm670.c now, change it
to static.
Fixes: 61164d220f52 ("pinctrl: qcom: add sdm670 pinctrl")
Signed-off-by: Yang Yingliang <yangyingliang@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221020075650.1031228-1-yangyingliang@huawei.com
Acked-by: Richard Acayan <mailingradian@gmail.com>
[Fix up subject]
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
The interrupt controller can detect only link changes. So in case an
external device generated a level based interrupt, then the interrupt
controller detected correctly the first edge. But the problem was that
the interrupt controller was detecting also the edge when the interrupt
was cleared. So it would generate another interrupt.
The fix for this is to clear the second interrupt but still check the
interrupt line status.
Fixes: c297561bc98a ("pinctrl: ocelot: Fix interrupt controller")
Signed-off-by: Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@microchip.com>
Tested-by: Michael Walle <michael@walle.cc>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221018070959.1322606-1-horatiu.vultur@microchip.com
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
This reverts commit ad2bea79ef0144043721d4893eef719c907e2e63.
On systems with older PMUFW (Xilinx ZynqMP Platform Management Firmware)
using these pinctrl properties can cause system hang because there is
missing feature autodetection.
When this feature is implemented in the PMUFW, support for these two
properties should bring back.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Sai Krishna Potthuri <sai.krishna.potthuri@amd.com>
Acked-by: Michal Simek <michal.simek@amd.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221017130303.21746-2-sai.krishna.potthuri@amd.com
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Back in the description of commit e440e30e26dd ("arm64: dts: qcom:
sc7180: Avoid glitching SPI CS at bootup on trogdor") we described a
problem that we were seeing on trogdor devices. I'll re-summarize here
but you can also re-read the original commit.
On trogdor devices, the BIOS is setting up the SPI chip select as:
- mux special function (SPI chip select)
- output enable
- output low (unused because we've muxed as special function)
In the kernel, however, we've moved away from using the chip select
line as special function. Since the kernel wants to fully control the
chip select it's far more efficient to treat the line as a GPIO rather
than sending packet-like commands to the GENI firmware every time we
want the line to toggle.
When we transition from how the BIOS had the pin configured to how the
kernel has the pin configured we end up glitching the line. That's
because we _first_ change the mux of the line and then later set its
output. This glitch is bad and can confuse the device on the other end
of the line.
The old commit e440e30e26dd ("arm64: dts: qcom: sc7180: Avoid
glitching SPI CS at bootup on trogdor") fixed the glitch, though the
solution was far from elegant. It essentially did the thing that
everyone always hates: encoding a sequential program in device tree,
even if it's a simple one. It also, unfortunately, got broken by
commit b991f8c3622c ("pinctrl: core: Handling pinmux and pinconf
separately"). After that commit we did all the muxing _first_ even
though the config (set the pin to output high) was listed first. :(
I looked at ideas for how to solve this more properly. My first
thought was to use the "init" pinctrl state. In theory the "init"
pinctrl state is supposed to be exactly for achieving glitch-free
transitions. My dream would have been for the "init" pinctrl to do
nothing at all. That would let us delay the automatic pin muxing until
the driver could set things up and call pinctrl_init_done(). In other
words, my dream was:
/* Request the GPIO; init it 1 (because DT says GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW) */
devm_gpiod_get_index(dev, "cs", GPIOD_OUT_LOW);
/* Output should be right, so we can remux, yay! */
pinctrl_init_done(dev);
Unfortunately, it didn't work out. The primary reason is that the MSM
GPIO driver implements gpio_request_enable(). As documented in
pinmux.h, that function automatically remuxes a line as a GPIO. ...and
it does this remuxing _before_ specifying the output of the pin. You
can see in gpiod_get_index() that we call gpiod_request() before
gpiod_configure_flags(). gpiod_request() isn't passed any flags so it
has no idea what the eventual output will be.
We could have debates about whether or not the automatic remuxing to
GPIO for the MSM pinctrl was a good idea or not, but at this point I
think there is a plethora of code that's relying on it and I certainly
wouldn't suggest changing it.
Alternatively, we could try to come up with a way to pass the initial
output state to gpio_request_enable() and plumb all that through. That
seems like it would be doable, but we'd have to plumb it through
several layers in the stack.
This patch implements yet another alternative. Here, we specifically
avoid glitching the first time a pin is muxed to GPIO function if the
direction of the pin is output. The idea is that we can read the state
of the pin before we set the mux and make sure that the re-mux won't
change the state.
NOTES:
- We only do this the first time since later swaps between mux states
might want to preserve the old output value. In other words, I
wouldn't want to break a driver that did:
gpiod_set_value(g, 1);
pinctrl_select_state(pinctrl, special_state);
pinctrl_select_default_state();
/* We should be driving 1 even if "special_state" made the pin 0 */
- It's safe to do this the first time since the driver _couldn't_ have
explicitly set a state. In order to even be able to control the GPIO
(at least using gpiod) we have to have requested it which would have
counted as the first mux.
- In theory, instead of keeping track of the first time a pin was set
as a GPIO we could enable the glitch-free behavior only when
msm_pinmux_request_gpio() is in the callchain. That works an enables
my "dream" implementation above where we use an "init" state to
solve this. However, it's nice not to have to do this. By handling
just the first transition to GPIO we can simply let the normal
"default" remuxing happen and we can be assured that there won't be
a glitch.
Before this change I could see the glitch reported on the EC console
when booting. It would say this when booting the kernel:
Unexpected state 1 in CSNRE ISR
After this change there is no error reported.
Note that I haven't reproduced the original problem described in
e440e30e26dd ("arm64: dts: qcom: sc7180: Avoid glitching SPI CS at
bootup on trogdor") but I could believe it might happen in certain
timing conditions.
Fixes: b991f8c3622c ("pinctrl: core: Handling pinmux and pinconf separately")
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221014103217.1.I656bb2c976ed626e5d37294eb252c1cf3be769dc@changeid
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Some laptops have been reported to wake up from s2idle when plugging
in the AC adapter or by closing the lid. This is a surprising
behavior that is further clarified by commit cb3e7d624c3ff ("PM:
wakeup: Add extra debugging statement for multiple active IRQs").
With that commit in place the following interaction can be seen
when the lid is closed:
[ 28.946038] PM: suspend-to-idle
[ 28.946083] ACPI: EC: ACPI EC GPE status set
[ 28.946101] ACPI: PM: Rearming ACPI SCI for wakeup
[ 28.950152] Timekeeping suspended for 3.320 seconds
[ 28.950152] PM: Triggering wakeup from IRQ 9
[ 28.950152] ACPI: EC: ACPI EC GPE status set
[ 28.950152] ACPI: EC: ACPI EC GPE dispatched
[ 28.995057] ACPI: EC: ACPI EC work flushed
[ 28.995075] ACPI: PM: Rearming ACPI SCI for wakeup
[ 28.995131] PM: Triggering wakeup from IRQ 9
[ 28.995271] ACPI: EC: ACPI EC GPE status set
[ 28.995291] ACPI: EC: ACPI EC GPE dispatched
[ 29.098556] ACPI: EC: ACPI EC work flushed
[ 29.207020] ACPI: EC: ACPI EC work flushed
[ 29.207037] ACPI: PM: Rearming ACPI SCI for wakeup
[ 29.211095] Timekeeping suspended for 0.739 seconds
[ 29.211095] PM: Triggering wakeup from IRQ 9
[ 29.211079] PM: Triggering wakeup from IRQ 7
[ 29.211095] ACPI: PM: ACPI non-EC GPE wakeup
[ 29.211095] PM: resume from suspend-to-idle
* IRQ9 on this laptop is used for the ACPI SCI.
* IRQ7 on this laptop is used for the GPIO controller.
What has occurred is when the lid was closed the EC woke up the
SoC from it's deepest sleep state and the kernel's s2idle loop
processed all EC events. When it was finished processing EC events,
it checked for any other reasons to wake (break the s2idle loop).
The IRQ for the GPIO controller was active so the loop broke, and
then this IRQ was processed. This is not a kernel bug but it is
certainly a surprising behavior, and to better debug it we should
have a dynamic debugging message that we can enact to catch it.
Acked-by: Basavaraj Natikar <Basavaraj.Natikar@amd.com>
Acked-by: Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com>
Acked-by: Mark Pearson <markpearson@lenovo.com>
Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221013134729.5592-2-mario.limonciello@amd.com
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
The OF node in the GPIO library is deprecated and soon
will be removed.
GPIO library now accepts fwnode as a firmware node, so
switch the driver to use it.
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Patrice Chotard <patrice.chotard@foss.st.com>
Reviewed-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221010075615.43244-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
