mirror of
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git
synced 2025-01-10 15:58:47 +00:00
09d3154a6f
Previously the CONFIG_PM_SLEEP and !CONFIG_PM_SLEEP device_init_wakeup() implementations differed in confusing ways: - The PM_SLEEP version checked for a NULL device pointer and returned -EINVAL, while the !PM_SLEEP version did not and would simply dereference a NULL pointer. - When called with "false", the !PM_SLEEP version cleared "capable" and "enable" in the opposite order of the PM_SLEEP version. That was harmless because for !PM_SLEEP they're simple assignments, but it's unnecessary confusion. Use a simplified version of the PM_SLEEP implementation for both cases. Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>