J. Bruce Fields 74dbafaf5d nfsd4: release openowners on free in >=4.1 case
We don't need to keep openowners around in the >=4.1 case, because they
aren't needed to handle CLOSE replays any more (that's a problem for
sessions).  And doing so causes unexpected failures on a subsequent
destroy_clientid to fail.

We probably also need something comparable for lock owners on last
unlock.

Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
2012-07-10 16:41:34 -04:00
..
2011-01-04 18:22:10 -05:00
2008-02-01 16:42:05 -05:00
2011-07-18 09:39:01 -04:00
2012-05-31 20:29:58 -04:00
2011-11-07 21:10:47 -05:00
2011-11-07 21:10:47 -05:00
2011-11-07 21:10:47 -05:00
2011-07-18 09:39:01 -04:00
2012-01-03 22:55:10 -05:00
2011-03-31 11:26:23 -03:00
2012-05-31 20:29:37 -04:00