Samuel Thibault 10f02d1c59 [PATCH] spin_unlock_bh() and preempt_check_resched()
In _spin_unlock_bh(lock):
	do { \
		_raw_spin_unlock(lock); \
		preempt_enable(); \
		local_bh_enable(); \
		__release(lock); \
	} while (0)

there is no reason for using preempt_enable() instead of a simple
preempt_enable_no_resched()

Since we know bottom halves are disabled, preempt_schedule() will always
return at once (preempt_count!=0), and hence preempt_check_resched() is
useless here...

This fixes it by using "preempt_enable_no_resched()" instead of the
"preempt_enable()", and thus avoids the useless preempt_check_resched()
just before re-enabling bottom halves.

Signed-off-by: Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@ens-lyon.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2005-05-21 10:46:48 -07:00
..
2005-05-17 07:59:18 -07:00
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
2005-04-29 17:30:07 +01:00
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
2005-04-16 15:24:01 -07:00
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
2005-04-24 20:38:02 -07:00
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
2005-05-20 15:48:19 -07:00
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
2005-05-01 08:59:12 -07:00
2005-05-05 16:36:50 -07:00
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00