linux-stable/fs/overlayfs/params.c

1076 lines
27 KiB
C
Raw Permalink Normal View History

ovl: modify layer parameter parsing We ran into issues where mount(8) passed multiple lower layers as one big string through fsconfig(). But the fsconfig() FSCONFIG_SET_STRING option is limited to 256 bytes in strndup_user(). While this would be fixable by extending the fsconfig() buffer I'd rather encourage users to append layers via multiple fsconfig() calls as the interface allows nicely for this. This has also been requested as a feature before. With this port to the new mount api the following will be possible: fsconfig(fs_fd, FSCONFIG_SET_STRING, "lowerdir", "/lower1", 0); /* set upper layer */ fsconfig(fs_fd, FSCONFIG_SET_STRING, "upperdir", "/upper", 0); /* append "/lower2", "/lower3", and "/lower4" */ fsconfig(fs_fd, FSCONFIG_SET_STRING, "lowerdir", ":/lower2:/lower3:/lower4", 0); /* turn index feature on */ fsconfig(fs_fd, FSCONFIG_SET_STRING, "index", "on", 0); /* append "/lower5" */ fsconfig(fs_fd, FSCONFIG_SET_STRING, "lowerdir", ":/lower5", 0); Specifying ':' would have been rejected so this isn't a regression. And we can't simply use "lowerdir=/lower" to append on top of existing layers as "lowerdir=/lower,lowerdir=/other-lower" would make "/other-lower" the only lower layer so we'd break uapi if we changed this. So the ':' prefix seems a good compromise. Users can choose to specify multiple layers at once or individual layers. A layer is appended if it starts with ":". This requires that the user has already added at least one layer before. If lowerdir is specified again without a leading ":" then all previous layers are dropped and replaced with the new layers. If lowerdir is specified and empty than all layers are simply dropped. An additional change is that overlayfs will now parse and resolve layers right when they are specified in fsconfig() instead of deferring until super block creation. This allows users to receive early errors. It also allows users to actually use up to 500 layers something which was theoretically possible but ended up not working due to the mount option string passed via mount(2) being too large. This also allows a more privileged process to set config options for a lesser privileged process as the creds for fsconfig() and the creds for fsopen() can differ. We could restrict that they match by enforcing that the creds of fsopen() and fsconfig() match but I don't see why that needs to be the case and allows for a good delegation mechanism. Plus, in the future it means we're able to extend overlayfs mount options and allow users to specify layers via file descriptors instead of paths: fsconfig(FSCONFIG_SET_PATH{_EMPTY}, "lowerdir", "lower1", dirfd); /* append */ fsconfig(FSCONFIG_SET_PATH{_EMPTY}, "lowerdir", "lower2", dirfd); /* append */ fsconfig(FSCONFIG_SET_PATH{_EMPTY}, "lowerdir", "lower3", dirfd); /* clear all layers specified until now */ fsconfig(FSCONFIG_SET_STRING, "lowerdir", NULL, 0); This would be especially nice if users create an overlayfs mount on top of idmapped layers or just in general private mounts created via open_tree(OPEN_TREE_CLONE). Those mounts would then never have to appear anywhere in the filesystem. But for now just do the minimal thing. We should probably aim to move more validation into ovl_fs_parse_param() so users get errors before fsconfig(FSCONFIG_CMD_CREATE). But that can be done in additional patches later. This is now also rebased on top of the lazy lowerdata lookup which allows the specificatin of data only layers using the new "::" syntax. The rules are simple. A data only layers cannot be followed by any regular layers and data layers must be preceeded by at least one regular layer. Parsing the lowerdir mount option must change because of this. The original patchset used the old lowerdir parsing function to split a lowerdir mount option string such as: lowerdir=/lower1:/lower2::/lower3::/lower4 simply replacing each non-escaped ":" by "\0". So sequences of non-escaped ":" were counted as layers. For example, the previous lowerdir mount option above would've counted 6 layers instead of 4 and a lowerdir mount option such as: lowerdir="/lower1:/lower2::/lower3::/lower4:::::::::::::::::::::::::::" would be counted as 33 layers. Other than being ugly this didn't matter much because kern_path() would reject the first "\0" layer. However, this overcounting of layers becomes problematic when we base allocations on it where we very much only want to allocate space for 4 layers instead of 33. So the new parsing function rejects non-escaped sequences of colons other than ":" and "::" immediately instead of relying on kern_path(). Link: https://github.com/util-linux/util-linux/issues/2287 Link: https://github.com/util-linux/util-linux/issues/1992 Link: https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/78702 Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-unionfs/20230530-klagen-zudem-32c0908c2108@brauner Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
2023-06-16 13:54:19 +00:00
// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
#include <linux/fs.h>
#include <linux/module.h>
ovl: modify layer parameter parsing We ran into issues where mount(8) passed multiple lower layers as one big string through fsconfig(). But the fsconfig() FSCONFIG_SET_STRING option is limited to 256 bytes in strndup_user(). While this would be fixable by extending the fsconfig() buffer I'd rather encourage users to append layers via multiple fsconfig() calls as the interface allows nicely for this. This has also been requested as a feature before. With this port to the new mount api the following will be possible: fsconfig(fs_fd, FSCONFIG_SET_STRING, "lowerdir", "/lower1", 0); /* set upper layer */ fsconfig(fs_fd, FSCONFIG_SET_STRING, "upperdir", "/upper", 0); /* append "/lower2", "/lower3", and "/lower4" */ fsconfig(fs_fd, FSCONFIG_SET_STRING, "lowerdir", ":/lower2:/lower3:/lower4", 0); /* turn index feature on */ fsconfig(fs_fd, FSCONFIG_SET_STRING, "index", "on", 0); /* append "/lower5" */ fsconfig(fs_fd, FSCONFIG_SET_STRING, "lowerdir", ":/lower5", 0); Specifying ':' would have been rejected so this isn't a regression. And we can't simply use "lowerdir=/lower" to append on top of existing layers as "lowerdir=/lower,lowerdir=/other-lower" would make "/other-lower" the only lower layer so we'd break uapi if we changed this. So the ':' prefix seems a good compromise. Users can choose to specify multiple layers at once or individual layers. A layer is appended if it starts with ":". This requires that the user has already added at least one layer before. If lowerdir is specified again without a leading ":" then all previous layers are dropped and replaced with the new layers. If lowerdir is specified and empty than all layers are simply dropped. An additional change is that overlayfs will now parse and resolve layers right when they are specified in fsconfig() instead of deferring until super block creation. This allows users to receive early errors. It also allows users to actually use up to 500 layers something which was theoretically possible but ended up not working due to the mount option string passed via mount(2) being too large. This also allows a more privileged process to set config options for a lesser privileged process as the creds for fsconfig() and the creds for fsopen() can differ. We could restrict that they match by enforcing that the creds of fsopen() and fsconfig() match but I don't see why that needs to be the case and allows for a good delegation mechanism. Plus, in the future it means we're able to extend overlayfs mount options and allow users to specify layers via file descriptors instead of paths: fsconfig(FSCONFIG_SET_PATH{_EMPTY}, "lowerdir", "lower1", dirfd); /* append */ fsconfig(FSCONFIG_SET_PATH{_EMPTY}, "lowerdir", "lower2", dirfd); /* append */ fsconfig(FSCONFIG_SET_PATH{_EMPTY}, "lowerdir", "lower3", dirfd); /* clear all layers specified until now */ fsconfig(FSCONFIG_SET_STRING, "lowerdir", NULL, 0); This would be especially nice if users create an overlayfs mount on top of idmapped layers or just in general private mounts created via open_tree(OPEN_TREE_CLONE). Those mounts would then never have to appear anywhere in the filesystem. But for now just do the minimal thing. We should probably aim to move more validation into ovl_fs_parse_param() so users get errors before fsconfig(FSCONFIG_CMD_CREATE). But that can be done in additional patches later. This is now also rebased on top of the lazy lowerdata lookup which allows the specificatin of data only layers using the new "::" syntax. The rules are simple. A data only layers cannot be followed by any regular layers and data layers must be preceeded by at least one regular layer. Parsing the lowerdir mount option must change because of this. The original patchset used the old lowerdir parsing function to split a lowerdir mount option string such as: lowerdir=/lower1:/lower2::/lower3::/lower4 simply replacing each non-escaped ":" by "\0". So sequences of non-escaped ":" were counted as layers. For example, the previous lowerdir mount option above would've counted 6 layers instead of 4 and a lowerdir mount option such as: lowerdir="/lower1:/lower2::/lower3::/lower4:::::::::::::::::::::::::::" would be counted as 33 layers. Other than being ugly this didn't matter much because kern_path() would reject the first "\0" layer. However, this overcounting of layers becomes problematic when we base allocations on it where we very much only want to allocate space for 4 layers instead of 33. So the new parsing function rejects non-escaped sequences of colons other than ":" and "::" immediately instead of relying on kern_path(). Link: https://github.com/util-linux/util-linux/issues/2287 Link: https://github.com/util-linux/util-linux/issues/1992 Link: https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/78702 Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-unionfs/20230530-klagen-zudem-32c0908c2108@brauner Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
2023-06-16 13:54:19 +00:00
#include <linux/namei.h>
#include <linux/fs_context.h>
#include <linux/fs_parser.h>
#include <linux/posix_acl_xattr.h>
#include <linux/seq_file.h>
ovl: modify layer parameter parsing We ran into issues where mount(8) passed multiple lower layers as one big string through fsconfig(). But the fsconfig() FSCONFIG_SET_STRING option is limited to 256 bytes in strndup_user(). While this would be fixable by extending the fsconfig() buffer I'd rather encourage users to append layers via multiple fsconfig() calls as the interface allows nicely for this. This has also been requested as a feature before. With this port to the new mount api the following will be possible: fsconfig(fs_fd, FSCONFIG_SET_STRING, "lowerdir", "/lower1", 0); /* set upper layer */ fsconfig(fs_fd, FSCONFIG_SET_STRING, "upperdir", "/upper", 0); /* append "/lower2", "/lower3", and "/lower4" */ fsconfig(fs_fd, FSCONFIG_SET_STRING, "lowerdir", ":/lower2:/lower3:/lower4", 0); /* turn index feature on */ fsconfig(fs_fd, FSCONFIG_SET_STRING, "index", "on", 0); /* append "/lower5" */ fsconfig(fs_fd, FSCONFIG_SET_STRING, "lowerdir", ":/lower5", 0); Specifying ':' would have been rejected so this isn't a regression. And we can't simply use "lowerdir=/lower" to append on top of existing layers as "lowerdir=/lower,lowerdir=/other-lower" would make "/other-lower" the only lower layer so we'd break uapi if we changed this. So the ':' prefix seems a good compromise. Users can choose to specify multiple layers at once or individual layers. A layer is appended if it starts with ":". This requires that the user has already added at least one layer before. If lowerdir is specified again without a leading ":" then all previous layers are dropped and replaced with the new layers. If lowerdir is specified and empty than all layers are simply dropped. An additional change is that overlayfs will now parse and resolve layers right when they are specified in fsconfig() instead of deferring until super block creation. This allows users to receive early errors. It also allows users to actually use up to 500 layers something which was theoretically possible but ended up not working due to the mount option string passed via mount(2) being too large. This also allows a more privileged process to set config options for a lesser privileged process as the creds for fsconfig() and the creds for fsopen() can differ. We could restrict that they match by enforcing that the creds of fsopen() and fsconfig() match but I don't see why that needs to be the case and allows for a good delegation mechanism. Plus, in the future it means we're able to extend overlayfs mount options and allow users to specify layers via file descriptors instead of paths: fsconfig(FSCONFIG_SET_PATH{_EMPTY}, "lowerdir", "lower1", dirfd); /* append */ fsconfig(FSCONFIG_SET_PATH{_EMPTY}, "lowerdir", "lower2", dirfd); /* append */ fsconfig(FSCONFIG_SET_PATH{_EMPTY}, "lowerdir", "lower3", dirfd); /* clear all layers specified until now */ fsconfig(FSCONFIG_SET_STRING, "lowerdir", NULL, 0); This would be especially nice if users create an overlayfs mount on top of idmapped layers or just in general private mounts created via open_tree(OPEN_TREE_CLONE). Those mounts would then never have to appear anywhere in the filesystem. But for now just do the minimal thing. We should probably aim to move more validation into ovl_fs_parse_param() so users get errors before fsconfig(FSCONFIG_CMD_CREATE). But that can be done in additional patches later. This is now also rebased on top of the lazy lowerdata lookup which allows the specificatin of data only layers using the new "::" syntax. The rules are simple. A data only layers cannot be followed by any regular layers and data layers must be preceeded by at least one regular layer. Parsing the lowerdir mount option must change because of this. The original patchset used the old lowerdir parsing function to split a lowerdir mount option string such as: lowerdir=/lower1:/lower2::/lower3::/lower4 simply replacing each non-escaped ":" by "\0". So sequences of non-escaped ":" were counted as layers. For example, the previous lowerdir mount option above would've counted 6 layers instead of 4 and a lowerdir mount option such as: lowerdir="/lower1:/lower2::/lower3::/lower4:::::::::::::::::::::::::::" would be counted as 33 layers. Other than being ugly this didn't matter much because kern_path() would reject the first "\0" layer. However, this overcounting of layers becomes problematic when we base allocations on it where we very much only want to allocate space for 4 layers instead of 33. So the new parsing function rejects non-escaped sequences of colons other than ":" and "::" immediately instead of relying on kern_path(). Link: https://github.com/util-linux/util-linux/issues/2287 Link: https://github.com/util-linux/util-linux/issues/1992 Link: https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/78702 Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-unionfs/20230530-klagen-zudem-32c0908c2108@brauner Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
2023-06-16 13:54:19 +00:00
#include <linux/xattr.h>
#include "overlayfs.h"
#include "params.h"
static bool ovl_redirect_dir_def = IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OVERLAY_FS_REDIRECT_DIR);
module_param_named(redirect_dir, ovl_redirect_dir_def, bool, 0644);
MODULE_PARM_DESC(redirect_dir,
"Default to on or off for the redirect_dir feature");
static bool ovl_redirect_always_follow =
IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OVERLAY_FS_REDIRECT_ALWAYS_FOLLOW);
module_param_named(redirect_always_follow, ovl_redirect_always_follow,
bool, 0644);
MODULE_PARM_DESC(redirect_always_follow,
"Follow redirects even if redirect_dir feature is turned off");
static bool ovl_xino_auto_def = IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OVERLAY_FS_XINO_AUTO);
module_param_named(xino_auto, ovl_xino_auto_def, bool, 0644);
MODULE_PARM_DESC(xino_auto,
"Auto enable xino feature");
static bool ovl_index_def = IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OVERLAY_FS_INDEX);
module_param_named(index, ovl_index_def, bool, 0644);
MODULE_PARM_DESC(index,
"Default to on or off for the inodes index feature");
static bool ovl_nfs_export_def = IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OVERLAY_FS_NFS_EXPORT);
module_param_named(nfs_export, ovl_nfs_export_def, bool, 0644);
MODULE_PARM_DESC(nfs_export,
"Default to on or off for the NFS export feature");
static bool ovl_metacopy_def = IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OVERLAY_FS_METACOPY);
module_param_named(metacopy, ovl_metacopy_def, bool, 0644);
MODULE_PARM_DESC(metacopy,
"Default to on or off for the metadata only copy up feature");
enum ovl_opt {
Opt_lowerdir,
Opt_lowerdir_add,
Opt_datadir_add,
Opt_upperdir,
Opt_workdir,
Opt_default_permissions,
Opt_redirect_dir,
Opt_index,
Opt_uuid,
Opt_nfs_export,
Opt_userxattr,
Opt_xino,
Opt_metacopy,
Opt_verity,
Opt_volatile,
};
static const struct constant_table ovl_parameter_bool[] = {
{ "on", true },
{ "off", false },
{}
};
static const struct constant_table ovl_parameter_uuid[] = {
{ "off", OVL_UUID_OFF },
{ "null", OVL_UUID_NULL },
{ "auto", OVL_UUID_AUTO },
{ "on", OVL_UUID_ON },
{}
};
static const char *ovl_uuid_mode(struct ovl_config *config)
{
return ovl_parameter_uuid[config->uuid].name;
}
static int ovl_uuid_def(void)
{
return OVL_UUID_AUTO;
}
static const struct constant_table ovl_parameter_xino[] = {
{ "off", OVL_XINO_OFF },
{ "auto", OVL_XINO_AUTO },
{ "on", OVL_XINO_ON },
{}
};
const char *ovl_xino_mode(struct ovl_config *config)
{
return ovl_parameter_xino[config->xino].name;
}
static int ovl_xino_def(void)
{
return ovl_xino_auto_def ? OVL_XINO_AUTO : OVL_XINO_OFF;
}
const struct constant_table ovl_parameter_redirect_dir[] = {
{ "off", OVL_REDIRECT_OFF },
{ "follow", OVL_REDIRECT_FOLLOW },
{ "nofollow", OVL_REDIRECT_NOFOLLOW },
{ "on", OVL_REDIRECT_ON },
{}
};
static const char *ovl_redirect_mode(struct ovl_config *config)
{
return ovl_parameter_redirect_dir[config->redirect_mode].name;
}
static int ovl_redirect_mode_def(void)
{
return ovl_redirect_dir_def ? OVL_REDIRECT_ON :
ovl_redirect_always_follow ? OVL_REDIRECT_FOLLOW :
OVL_REDIRECT_NOFOLLOW;
}
static const struct constant_table ovl_parameter_verity[] = {
{ "off", OVL_VERITY_OFF },
{ "on", OVL_VERITY_ON },
{ "require", OVL_VERITY_REQUIRE },
{}
};
static const char *ovl_verity_mode(struct ovl_config *config)
{
return ovl_parameter_verity[config->verity_mode].name;
}
static int ovl_verity_mode_def(void)
{
return OVL_VERITY_OFF;
}
const struct fs_parameter_spec ovl_parameter_spec[] = {
fsparam_string_empty("lowerdir", Opt_lowerdir),
fsparam_file_or_string("lowerdir+", Opt_lowerdir_add),
fsparam_file_or_string("datadir+", Opt_datadir_add),
fsparam_file_or_string("upperdir", Opt_upperdir),
fsparam_file_or_string("workdir", Opt_workdir),
fsparam_flag("default_permissions", Opt_default_permissions),
fsparam_enum("redirect_dir", Opt_redirect_dir, ovl_parameter_redirect_dir),
fsparam_enum("index", Opt_index, ovl_parameter_bool),
fsparam_enum("uuid", Opt_uuid, ovl_parameter_uuid),
fsparam_enum("nfs_export", Opt_nfs_export, ovl_parameter_bool),
fsparam_flag("userxattr", Opt_userxattr),
fsparam_enum("xino", Opt_xino, ovl_parameter_xino),
fsparam_enum("metacopy", Opt_metacopy, ovl_parameter_bool),
fsparam_enum("verity", Opt_verity, ovl_parameter_verity),
fsparam_flag("volatile", Opt_volatile),
{}
};
ovl: modify layer parameter parsing We ran into issues where mount(8) passed multiple lower layers as one big string through fsconfig(). But the fsconfig() FSCONFIG_SET_STRING option is limited to 256 bytes in strndup_user(). While this would be fixable by extending the fsconfig() buffer I'd rather encourage users to append layers via multiple fsconfig() calls as the interface allows nicely for this. This has also been requested as a feature before. With this port to the new mount api the following will be possible: fsconfig(fs_fd, FSCONFIG_SET_STRING, "lowerdir", "/lower1", 0); /* set upper layer */ fsconfig(fs_fd, FSCONFIG_SET_STRING, "upperdir", "/upper", 0); /* append "/lower2", "/lower3", and "/lower4" */ fsconfig(fs_fd, FSCONFIG_SET_STRING, "lowerdir", ":/lower2:/lower3:/lower4", 0); /* turn index feature on */ fsconfig(fs_fd, FSCONFIG_SET_STRING, "index", "on", 0); /* append "/lower5" */ fsconfig(fs_fd, FSCONFIG_SET_STRING, "lowerdir", ":/lower5", 0); Specifying ':' would have been rejected so this isn't a regression. And we can't simply use "lowerdir=/lower" to append on top of existing layers as "lowerdir=/lower,lowerdir=/other-lower" would make "/other-lower" the only lower layer so we'd break uapi if we changed this. So the ':' prefix seems a good compromise. Users can choose to specify multiple layers at once or individual layers. A layer is appended if it starts with ":". This requires that the user has already added at least one layer before. If lowerdir is specified again without a leading ":" then all previous layers are dropped and replaced with the new layers. If lowerdir is specified and empty than all layers are simply dropped. An additional change is that overlayfs will now parse and resolve layers right when they are specified in fsconfig() instead of deferring until super block creation. This allows users to receive early errors. It also allows users to actually use up to 500 layers something which was theoretically possible but ended up not working due to the mount option string passed via mount(2) being too large. This also allows a more privileged process to set config options for a lesser privileged process as the creds for fsconfig() and the creds for fsopen() can differ. We could restrict that they match by enforcing that the creds of fsopen() and fsconfig() match but I don't see why that needs to be the case and allows for a good delegation mechanism. Plus, in the future it means we're able to extend overlayfs mount options and allow users to specify layers via file descriptors instead of paths: fsconfig(FSCONFIG_SET_PATH{_EMPTY}, "lowerdir", "lower1", dirfd); /* append */ fsconfig(FSCONFIG_SET_PATH{_EMPTY}, "lowerdir", "lower2", dirfd); /* append */ fsconfig(FSCONFIG_SET_PATH{_EMPTY}, "lowerdir", "lower3", dirfd); /* clear all layers specified until now */ fsconfig(FSCONFIG_SET_STRING, "lowerdir", NULL, 0); This would be especially nice if users create an overlayfs mount on top of idmapped layers or just in general private mounts created via open_tree(OPEN_TREE_CLONE). Those mounts would then never have to appear anywhere in the filesystem. But for now just do the minimal thing. We should probably aim to move more validation into ovl_fs_parse_param() so users get errors before fsconfig(FSCONFIG_CMD_CREATE). But that can be done in additional patches later. This is now also rebased on top of the lazy lowerdata lookup which allows the specificatin of data only layers using the new "::" syntax. The rules are simple. A data only layers cannot be followed by any regular layers and data layers must be preceeded by at least one regular layer. Parsing the lowerdir mount option must change because of this. The original patchset used the old lowerdir parsing function to split a lowerdir mount option string such as: lowerdir=/lower1:/lower2::/lower3::/lower4 simply replacing each non-escaped ":" by "\0". So sequences of non-escaped ":" were counted as layers. For example, the previous lowerdir mount option above would've counted 6 layers instead of 4 and a lowerdir mount option such as: lowerdir="/lower1:/lower2::/lower3::/lower4:::::::::::::::::::::::::::" would be counted as 33 layers. Other than being ugly this didn't matter much because kern_path() would reject the first "\0" layer. However, this overcounting of layers becomes problematic when we base allocations on it where we very much only want to allocate space for 4 layers instead of 33. So the new parsing function rejects non-escaped sequences of colons other than ":" and "::" immediately instead of relying on kern_path(). Link: https://github.com/util-linux/util-linux/issues/2287 Link: https://github.com/util-linux/util-linux/issues/1992 Link: https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/78702 Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-unionfs/20230530-klagen-zudem-32c0908c2108@brauner Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
2023-06-16 13:54:19 +00:00
static char *ovl_next_opt(char **s)
{
char *sbegin = *s;
char *p;
if (sbegin == NULL)
return NULL;
for (p = sbegin; *p; p++) {
if (*p == '\\') {
p++;
if (!*p)
break;
} else if (*p == ',') {
*p = '\0';
*s = p + 1;
return sbegin;
}
}
*s = NULL;
return sbegin;
}
static int ovl_parse_monolithic(struct fs_context *fc, void *data)
{
return vfs_parse_monolithic_sep(fc, data, ovl_next_opt);
}
ovl: modify layer parameter parsing We ran into issues where mount(8) passed multiple lower layers as one big string through fsconfig(). But the fsconfig() FSCONFIG_SET_STRING option is limited to 256 bytes in strndup_user(). While this would be fixable by extending the fsconfig() buffer I'd rather encourage users to append layers via multiple fsconfig() calls as the interface allows nicely for this. This has also been requested as a feature before. With this port to the new mount api the following will be possible: fsconfig(fs_fd, FSCONFIG_SET_STRING, "lowerdir", "/lower1", 0); /* set upper layer */ fsconfig(fs_fd, FSCONFIG_SET_STRING, "upperdir", "/upper", 0); /* append "/lower2", "/lower3", and "/lower4" */ fsconfig(fs_fd, FSCONFIG_SET_STRING, "lowerdir", ":/lower2:/lower3:/lower4", 0); /* turn index feature on */ fsconfig(fs_fd, FSCONFIG_SET_STRING, "index", "on", 0); /* append "/lower5" */ fsconfig(fs_fd, FSCONFIG_SET_STRING, "lowerdir", ":/lower5", 0); Specifying ':' would have been rejected so this isn't a regression. And we can't simply use "lowerdir=/lower" to append on top of existing layers as "lowerdir=/lower,lowerdir=/other-lower" would make "/other-lower" the only lower layer so we'd break uapi if we changed this. So the ':' prefix seems a good compromise. Users can choose to specify multiple layers at once or individual layers. A layer is appended if it starts with ":". This requires that the user has already added at least one layer before. If lowerdir is specified again without a leading ":" then all previous layers are dropped and replaced with the new layers. If lowerdir is specified and empty than all layers are simply dropped. An additional change is that overlayfs will now parse and resolve layers right when they are specified in fsconfig() instead of deferring until super block creation. This allows users to receive early errors. It also allows users to actually use up to 500 layers something which was theoretically possible but ended up not working due to the mount option string passed via mount(2) being too large. This also allows a more privileged process to set config options for a lesser privileged process as the creds for fsconfig() and the creds for fsopen() can differ. We could restrict that they match by enforcing that the creds of fsopen() and fsconfig() match but I don't see why that needs to be the case and allows for a good delegation mechanism. Plus, in the future it means we're able to extend overlayfs mount options and allow users to specify layers via file descriptors instead of paths: fsconfig(FSCONFIG_SET_PATH{_EMPTY}, "lowerdir", "lower1", dirfd); /* append */ fsconfig(FSCONFIG_SET_PATH{_EMPTY}, "lowerdir", "lower2", dirfd); /* append */ fsconfig(FSCONFIG_SET_PATH{_EMPTY}, "lowerdir", "lower3", dirfd); /* clear all layers specified until now */ fsconfig(FSCONFIG_SET_STRING, "lowerdir", NULL, 0); This would be especially nice if users create an overlayfs mount on top of idmapped layers or just in general private mounts created via open_tree(OPEN_TREE_CLONE). Those mounts would then never have to appear anywhere in the filesystem. But for now just do the minimal thing. We should probably aim to move more validation into ovl_fs_parse_param() so users get errors before fsconfig(FSCONFIG_CMD_CREATE). But that can be done in additional patches later. This is now also rebased on top of the lazy lowerdata lookup which allows the specificatin of data only layers using the new "::" syntax. The rules are simple. A data only layers cannot be followed by any regular layers and data layers must be preceeded by at least one regular layer. Parsing the lowerdir mount option must change because of this. The original patchset used the old lowerdir parsing function to split a lowerdir mount option string such as: lowerdir=/lower1:/lower2::/lower3::/lower4 simply replacing each non-escaped ":" by "\0". So sequences of non-escaped ":" were counted as layers. For example, the previous lowerdir mount option above would've counted 6 layers instead of 4 and a lowerdir mount option such as: lowerdir="/lower1:/lower2::/lower3::/lower4:::::::::::::::::::::::::::" would be counted as 33 layers. Other than being ugly this didn't matter much because kern_path() would reject the first "\0" layer. However, this overcounting of layers becomes problematic when we base allocations on it where we very much only want to allocate space for 4 layers instead of 33. So the new parsing function rejects non-escaped sequences of colons other than ":" and "::" immediately instead of relying on kern_path(). Link: https://github.com/util-linux/util-linux/issues/2287 Link: https://github.com/util-linux/util-linux/issues/1992 Link: https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/78702 Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-unionfs/20230530-klagen-zudem-32c0908c2108@brauner Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
2023-06-16 13:54:19 +00:00
static ssize_t ovl_parse_param_split_lowerdirs(char *str)
{
ssize_t nr_layers = 1, nr_colons = 0;
char *s, *d;
for (s = d = str;; s++, d++) {
if (*s == '\\') {
/* keep esc chars in split lowerdir */
*d++ = *s++;
ovl: modify layer parameter parsing We ran into issues where mount(8) passed multiple lower layers as one big string through fsconfig(). But the fsconfig() FSCONFIG_SET_STRING option is limited to 256 bytes in strndup_user(). While this would be fixable by extending the fsconfig() buffer I'd rather encourage users to append layers via multiple fsconfig() calls as the interface allows nicely for this. This has also been requested as a feature before. With this port to the new mount api the following will be possible: fsconfig(fs_fd, FSCONFIG_SET_STRING, "lowerdir", "/lower1", 0); /* set upper layer */ fsconfig(fs_fd, FSCONFIG_SET_STRING, "upperdir", "/upper", 0); /* append "/lower2", "/lower3", and "/lower4" */ fsconfig(fs_fd, FSCONFIG_SET_STRING, "lowerdir", ":/lower2:/lower3:/lower4", 0); /* turn index feature on */ fsconfig(fs_fd, FSCONFIG_SET_STRING, "index", "on", 0); /* append "/lower5" */ fsconfig(fs_fd, FSCONFIG_SET_STRING, "lowerdir", ":/lower5", 0); Specifying ':' would have been rejected so this isn't a regression. And we can't simply use "lowerdir=/lower" to append on top of existing layers as "lowerdir=/lower,lowerdir=/other-lower" would make "/other-lower" the only lower layer so we'd break uapi if we changed this. So the ':' prefix seems a good compromise. Users can choose to specify multiple layers at once or individual layers. A layer is appended if it starts with ":". This requires that the user has already added at least one layer before. If lowerdir is specified again without a leading ":" then all previous layers are dropped and replaced with the new layers. If lowerdir is specified and empty than all layers are simply dropped. An additional change is that overlayfs will now parse and resolve layers right when they are specified in fsconfig() instead of deferring until super block creation. This allows users to receive early errors. It also allows users to actually use up to 500 layers something which was theoretically possible but ended up not working due to the mount option string passed via mount(2) being too large. This also allows a more privileged process to set config options for a lesser privileged process as the creds for fsconfig() and the creds for fsopen() can differ. We could restrict that they match by enforcing that the creds of fsopen() and fsconfig() match but I don't see why that needs to be the case and allows for a good delegation mechanism. Plus, in the future it means we're able to extend overlayfs mount options and allow users to specify layers via file descriptors instead of paths: fsconfig(FSCONFIG_SET_PATH{_EMPTY}, "lowerdir", "lower1", dirfd); /* append */ fsconfig(FSCONFIG_SET_PATH{_EMPTY}, "lowerdir", "lower2", dirfd); /* append */ fsconfig(FSCONFIG_SET_PATH{_EMPTY}, "lowerdir", "lower3", dirfd); /* clear all layers specified until now */ fsconfig(FSCONFIG_SET_STRING, "lowerdir", NULL, 0); This would be especially nice if users create an overlayfs mount on top of idmapped layers or just in general private mounts created via open_tree(OPEN_TREE_CLONE). Those mounts would then never have to appear anywhere in the filesystem. But for now just do the minimal thing. We should probably aim to move more validation into ovl_fs_parse_param() so users get errors before fsconfig(FSCONFIG_CMD_CREATE). But that can be done in additional patches later. This is now also rebased on top of the lazy lowerdata lookup which allows the specificatin of data only layers using the new "::" syntax. The rules are simple. A data only layers cannot be followed by any regular layers and data layers must be preceeded by at least one regular layer. Parsing the lowerdir mount option must change because of this. The original patchset used the old lowerdir parsing function to split a lowerdir mount option string such as: lowerdir=/lower1:/lower2::/lower3::/lower4 simply replacing each non-escaped ":" by "\0". So sequences of non-escaped ":" were counted as layers. For example, the previous lowerdir mount option above would've counted 6 layers instead of 4 and a lowerdir mount option such as: lowerdir="/lower1:/lower2::/lower3::/lower4:::::::::::::::::::::::::::" would be counted as 33 layers. Other than being ugly this didn't matter much because kern_path() would reject the first "\0" layer. However, this overcounting of layers becomes problematic when we base allocations on it where we very much only want to allocate space for 4 layers instead of 33. So the new parsing function rejects non-escaped sequences of colons other than ":" and "::" immediately instead of relying on kern_path(). Link: https://github.com/util-linux/util-linux/issues/2287 Link: https://github.com/util-linux/util-linux/issues/1992 Link: https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/78702 Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-unionfs/20230530-klagen-zudem-32c0908c2108@brauner Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
2023-06-16 13:54:19 +00:00
} else if (*s == ':') {
bool next_colon = (*(s + 1) == ':');
nr_colons++;
if (nr_colons == 2 && next_colon) {
pr_err("only single ':' or double '::' sequences of unescaped colons in lowerdir mount option allowed.\n");
return -EINVAL;
}
/* count layers, not colons */
if (!next_colon)
nr_layers++;
*d = '\0';
continue;
}
*d = *s;
if (!*s) {
/* trailing colons */
if (nr_colons) {
pr_err("unescaped trailing colons in lowerdir mount option.\n");
return -EINVAL;
}
break;
}
nr_colons = 0;
}
return nr_layers;
}
static int ovl_mount_dir_noesc(const char *name, struct path *path)
{
int err = -EINVAL;
if (!*name) {
pr_err("empty lowerdir\n");
goto out;
}
err = kern_path(name, LOOKUP_FOLLOW, path);
if (err) {
pr_err("failed to resolve '%s': %i\n", name, err);
goto out;
}
return 0;
out:
return err;
}
static void ovl_unescape(char *s)
{
char *d = s;
for (;; s++, d++) {
if (*s == '\\')
s++;
*d = *s;
if (!*s)
break;
}
}
static int ovl_mount_dir(const char *name, struct path *path)
ovl: modify layer parameter parsing We ran into issues where mount(8) passed multiple lower layers as one big string through fsconfig(). But the fsconfig() FSCONFIG_SET_STRING option is limited to 256 bytes in strndup_user(). While this would be fixable by extending the fsconfig() buffer I'd rather encourage users to append layers via multiple fsconfig() calls as the interface allows nicely for this. This has also been requested as a feature before. With this port to the new mount api the following will be possible: fsconfig(fs_fd, FSCONFIG_SET_STRING, "lowerdir", "/lower1", 0); /* set upper layer */ fsconfig(fs_fd, FSCONFIG_SET_STRING, "upperdir", "/upper", 0); /* append "/lower2", "/lower3", and "/lower4" */ fsconfig(fs_fd, FSCONFIG_SET_STRING, "lowerdir", ":/lower2:/lower3:/lower4", 0); /* turn index feature on */ fsconfig(fs_fd, FSCONFIG_SET_STRING, "index", "on", 0); /* append "/lower5" */ fsconfig(fs_fd, FSCONFIG_SET_STRING, "lowerdir", ":/lower5", 0); Specifying ':' would have been rejected so this isn't a regression. And we can't simply use "lowerdir=/lower" to append on top of existing layers as "lowerdir=/lower,lowerdir=/other-lower" would make "/other-lower" the only lower layer so we'd break uapi if we changed this. So the ':' prefix seems a good compromise. Users can choose to specify multiple layers at once or individual layers. A layer is appended if it starts with ":". This requires that the user has already added at least one layer before. If lowerdir is specified again without a leading ":" then all previous layers are dropped and replaced with the new layers. If lowerdir is specified and empty than all layers are simply dropped. An additional change is that overlayfs will now parse and resolve layers right when they are specified in fsconfig() instead of deferring until super block creation. This allows users to receive early errors. It also allows users to actually use up to 500 layers something which was theoretically possible but ended up not working due to the mount option string passed via mount(2) being too large. This also allows a more privileged process to set config options for a lesser privileged process as the creds for fsconfig() and the creds for fsopen() can differ. We could restrict that they match by enforcing that the creds of fsopen() and fsconfig() match but I don't see why that needs to be the case and allows for a good delegation mechanism. Plus, in the future it means we're able to extend overlayfs mount options and allow users to specify layers via file descriptors instead of paths: fsconfig(FSCONFIG_SET_PATH{_EMPTY}, "lowerdir", "lower1", dirfd); /* append */ fsconfig(FSCONFIG_SET_PATH{_EMPTY}, "lowerdir", "lower2", dirfd); /* append */ fsconfig(FSCONFIG_SET_PATH{_EMPTY}, "lowerdir", "lower3", dirfd); /* clear all layers specified until now */ fsconfig(FSCONFIG_SET_STRING, "lowerdir", NULL, 0); This would be especially nice if users create an overlayfs mount on top of idmapped layers or just in general private mounts created via open_tree(OPEN_TREE_CLONE). Those mounts would then never have to appear anywhere in the filesystem. But for now just do the minimal thing. We should probably aim to move more validation into ovl_fs_parse_param() so users get errors before fsconfig(FSCONFIG_CMD_CREATE). But that can be done in additional patches later. This is now also rebased on top of the lazy lowerdata lookup which allows the specificatin of data only layers using the new "::" syntax. The rules are simple. A data only layers cannot be followed by any regular layers and data layers must be preceeded by at least one regular layer. Parsing the lowerdir mount option must change because of this. The original patchset used the old lowerdir parsing function to split a lowerdir mount option string such as: lowerdir=/lower1:/lower2::/lower3::/lower4 simply replacing each non-escaped ":" by "\0". So sequences of non-escaped ":" were counted as layers. For example, the previous lowerdir mount option above would've counted 6 layers instead of 4 and a lowerdir mount option such as: lowerdir="/lower1:/lower2::/lower3::/lower4:::::::::::::::::::::::::::" would be counted as 33 layers. Other than being ugly this didn't matter much because kern_path() would reject the first "\0" layer. However, this overcounting of layers becomes problematic when we base allocations on it where we very much only want to allocate space for 4 layers instead of 33. So the new parsing function rejects non-escaped sequences of colons other than ":" and "::" immediately instead of relying on kern_path(). Link: https://github.com/util-linux/util-linux/issues/2287 Link: https://github.com/util-linux/util-linux/issues/1992 Link: https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/78702 Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-unionfs/20230530-klagen-zudem-32c0908c2108@brauner Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
2023-06-16 13:54:19 +00:00
{
int err = -ENOMEM;
char *tmp = kstrdup(name, GFP_KERNEL);
if (tmp) {
ovl_unescape(tmp);
err = ovl_mount_dir_noesc(tmp, path);
kfree(tmp);
}
return err;
}
static int ovl_mount_dir_check(struct fs_context *fc, const struct path *path,
enum ovl_opt layer, const char *name, bool upper)
ovl: modify layer parameter parsing We ran into issues where mount(8) passed multiple lower layers as one big string through fsconfig(). But the fsconfig() FSCONFIG_SET_STRING option is limited to 256 bytes in strndup_user(). While this would be fixable by extending the fsconfig() buffer I'd rather encourage users to append layers via multiple fsconfig() calls as the interface allows nicely for this. This has also been requested as a feature before. With this port to the new mount api the following will be possible: fsconfig(fs_fd, FSCONFIG_SET_STRING, "lowerdir", "/lower1", 0); /* set upper layer */ fsconfig(fs_fd, FSCONFIG_SET_STRING, "upperdir", "/upper", 0); /* append "/lower2", "/lower3", and "/lower4" */ fsconfig(fs_fd, FSCONFIG_SET_STRING, "lowerdir", ":/lower2:/lower3:/lower4", 0); /* turn index feature on */ fsconfig(fs_fd, FSCONFIG_SET_STRING, "index", "on", 0); /* append "/lower5" */ fsconfig(fs_fd, FSCONFIG_SET_STRING, "lowerdir", ":/lower5", 0); Specifying ':' would have been rejected so this isn't a regression. And we can't simply use "lowerdir=/lower" to append on top of existing layers as "lowerdir=/lower,lowerdir=/other-lower" would make "/other-lower" the only lower layer so we'd break uapi if we changed this. So the ':' prefix seems a good compromise. Users can choose to specify multiple layers at once or individual layers. A layer is appended if it starts with ":". This requires that the user has already added at least one layer before. If lowerdir is specified again without a leading ":" then all previous layers are dropped and replaced with the new layers. If lowerdir is specified and empty than all layers are simply dropped. An additional change is that overlayfs will now parse and resolve layers right when they are specified in fsconfig() instead of deferring until super block creation. This allows users to receive early errors. It also allows users to actually use up to 500 layers something which was theoretically possible but ended up not working due to the mount option string passed via mount(2) being too large. This also allows a more privileged process to set config options for a lesser privileged process as the creds for fsconfig() and the creds for fsopen() can differ. We could restrict that they match by enforcing that the creds of fsopen() and fsconfig() match but I don't see why that needs to be the case and allows for a good delegation mechanism. Plus, in the future it means we're able to extend overlayfs mount options and allow users to specify layers via file descriptors instead of paths: fsconfig(FSCONFIG_SET_PATH{_EMPTY}, "lowerdir", "lower1", dirfd); /* append */ fsconfig(FSCONFIG_SET_PATH{_EMPTY}, "lowerdir", "lower2", dirfd); /* append */ fsconfig(FSCONFIG_SET_PATH{_EMPTY}, "lowerdir", "lower3", dirfd); /* clear all layers specified until now */ fsconfig(FSCONFIG_SET_STRING, "lowerdir", NULL, 0); This would be especially nice if users create an overlayfs mount on top of idmapped layers or just in general private mounts created via open_tree(OPEN_TREE_CLONE). Those mounts would then never have to appear anywhere in the filesystem. But for now just do the minimal thing. We should probably aim to move more validation into ovl_fs_parse_param() so users get errors before fsconfig(FSCONFIG_CMD_CREATE). But that can be done in additional patches later. This is now also rebased on top of the lazy lowerdata lookup which allows the specificatin of data only layers using the new "::" syntax. The rules are simple. A data only layers cannot be followed by any regular layers and data layers must be preceeded by at least one regular layer. Parsing the lowerdir mount option must change because of this. The original patchset used the old lowerdir parsing function to split a lowerdir mount option string such as: lowerdir=/lower1:/lower2::/lower3::/lower4 simply replacing each non-escaped ":" by "\0". So sequences of non-escaped ":" were counted as layers. For example, the previous lowerdir mount option above would've counted 6 layers instead of 4 and a lowerdir mount option such as: lowerdir="/lower1:/lower2::/lower3::/lower4:::::::::::::::::::::::::::" would be counted as 33 layers. Other than being ugly this didn't matter much because kern_path() would reject the first "\0" layer. However, this overcounting of layers becomes problematic when we base allocations on it where we very much only want to allocate space for 4 layers instead of 33. So the new parsing function rejects non-escaped sequences of colons other than ":" and "::" immediately instead of relying on kern_path(). Link: https://github.com/util-linux/util-linux/issues/2287 Link: https://github.com/util-linux/util-linux/issues/1992 Link: https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/78702 Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-unionfs/20230530-klagen-zudem-32c0908c2108@brauner Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
2023-06-16 13:54:19 +00:00
{
struct ovl_fs_context *ctx = fc->fs_private;
if (!d_is_dir(path->dentry))
return invalfc(fc, "%s is not a directory", name);
ovl: modify layer parameter parsing We ran into issues where mount(8) passed multiple lower layers as one big string through fsconfig(). But the fsconfig() FSCONFIG_SET_STRING option is limited to 256 bytes in strndup_user(). While this would be fixable by extending the fsconfig() buffer I'd rather encourage users to append layers via multiple fsconfig() calls as the interface allows nicely for this. This has also been requested as a feature before. With this port to the new mount api the following will be possible: fsconfig(fs_fd, FSCONFIG_SET_STRING, "lowerdir", "/lower1", 0); /* set upper layer */ fsconfig(fs_fd, FSCONFIG_SET_STRING, "upperdir", "/upper", 0); /* append "/lower2", "/lower3", and "/lower4" */ fsconfig(fs_fd, FSCONFIG_SET_STRING, "lowerdir", ":/lower2:/lower3:/lower4", 0); /* turn index feature on */ fsconfig(fs_fd, FSCONFIG_SET_STRING, "index", "on", 0); /* append "/lower5" */ fsconfig(fs_fd, FSCONFIG_SET_STRING, "lowerdir", ":/lower5", 0); Specifying ':' would have been rejected so this isn't a regression. And we can't simply use "lowerdir=/lower" to append on top of existing layers as "lowerdir=/lower,lowerdir=/other-lower" would make "/other-lower" the only lower layer so we'd break uapi if we changed this. So the ':' prefix seems a good compromise. Users can choose to specify multiple layers at once or individual layers. A layer is appended if it starts with ":". This requires that the user has already added at least one layer before. If lowerdir is specified again without a leading ":" then all previous layers are dropped and replaced with the new layers. If lowerdir is specified and empty than all layers are simply dropped. An additional change is that overlayfs will now parse and resolve layers right when they are specified in fsconfig() instead of deferring until super block creation. This allows users to receive early errors. It also allows users to actually use up to 500 layers something which was theoretically possible but ended up not working due to the mount option string passed via mount(2) being too large. This also allows a more privileged process to set config options for a lesser privileged process as the creds for fsconfig() and the creds for fsopen() can differ. We could restrict that they match by enforcing that the creds of fsopen() and fsconfig() match but I don't see why that needs to be the case and allows for a good delegation mechanism. Plus, in the future it means we're able to extend overlayfs mount options and allow users to specify layers via file descriptors instead of paths: fsconfig(FSCONFIG_SET_PATH{_EMPTY}, "lowerdir", "lower1", dirfd); /* append */ fsconfig(FSCONFIG_SET_PATH{_EMPTY}, "lowerdir", "lower2", dirfd); /* append */ fsconfig(FSCONFIG_SET_PATH{_EMPTY}, "lowerdir", "lower3", dirfd); /* clear all layers specified until now */ fsconfig(FSCONFIG_SET_STRING, "lowerdir", NULL, 0); This would be especially nice if users create an overlayfs mount on top of idmapped layers or just in general private mounts created via open_tree(OPEN_TREE_CLONE). Those mounts would then never have to appear anywhere in the filesystem. But for now just do the minimal thing. We should probably aim to move more validation into ovl_fs_parse_param() so users get errors before fsconfig(FSCONFIG_CMD_CREATE). But that can be done in additional patches later. This is now also rebased on top of the lazy lowerdata lookup which allows the specificatin of data only layers using the new "::" syntax. The rules are simple. A data only layers cannot be followed by any regular layers and data layers must be preceeded by at least one regular layer. Parsing the lowerdir mount option must change because of this. The original patchset used the old lowerdir parsing function to split a lowerdir mount option string such as: lowerdir=/lower1:/lower2::/lower3::/lower4 simply replacing each non-escaped ":" by "\0". So sequences of non-escaped ":" were counted as layers. For example, the previous lowerdir mount option above would've counted 6 layers instead of 4 and a lowerdir mount option such as: lowerdir="/lower1:/lower2::/lower3::/lower4:::::::::::::::::::::::::::" would be counted as 33 layers. Other than being ugly this didn't matter much because kern_path() would reject the first "\0" layer. However, this overcounting of layers becomes problematic when we base allocations on it where we very much only want to allocate space for 4 layers instead of 33. So the new parsing function rejects non-escaped sequences of colons other than ":" and "::" immediately instead of relying on kern_path(). Link: https://github.com/util-linux/util-linux/issues/2287 Link: https://github.com/util-linux/util-linux/issues/1992 Link: https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/78702 Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-unionfs/20230530-klagen-zudem-32c0908c2108@brauner Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
2023-06-16 13:54:19 +00:00
/*
* Root dentries of case-insensitive capable filesystems might
* not have the dentry operations set, but still be incompatible
* with overlayfs. Check explicitly to prevent post-mount
* failures.
*/
if (sb_has_encoding(path->mnt->mnt_sb))
return invalfc(fc, "case-insensitive capable filesystem on %s not supported", name);
if (ovl_dentry_weird(path->dentry))
return invalfc(fc, "filesystem on %s not supported", name);
ovl: modify layer parameter parsing We ran into issues where mount(8) passed multiple lower layers as one big string through fsconfig(). But the fsconfig() FSCONFIG_SET_STRING option is limited to 256 bytes in strndup_user(). While this would be fixable by extending the fsconfig() buffer I'd rather encourage users to append layers via multiple fsconfig() calls as the interface allows nicely for this. This has also been requested as a feature before. With this port to the new mount api the following will be possible: fsconfig(fs_fd, FSCONFIG_SET_STRING, "lowerdir", "/lower1", 0); /* set upper layer */ fsconfig(fs_fd, FSCONFIG_SET_STRING, "upperdir", "/upper", 0); /* append "/lower2", "/lower3", and "/lower4" */ fsconfig(fs_fd, FSCONFIG_SET_STRING, "lowerdir", ":/lower2:/lower3:/lower4", 0); /* turn index feature on */ fsconfig(fs_fd, FSCONFIG_SET_STRING, "index", "on", 0); /* append "/lower5" */ fsconfig(fs_fd, FSCONFIG_SET_STRING, "lowerdir", ":/lower5", 0); Specifying ':' would have been rejected so this isn't a regression. And we can't simply use "lowerdir=/lower" to append on top of existing layers as "lowerdir=/lower,lowerdir=/other-lower" would make "/other-lower" the only lower layer so we'd break uapi if we changed this. So the ':' prefix seems a good compromise. Users can choose to specify multiple layers at once or individual layers. A layer is appended if it starts with ":". This requires that the user has already added at least one layer before. If lowerdir is specified again without a leading ":" then all previous layers are dropped and replaced with the new layers. If lowerdir is specified and empty than all layers are simply dropped. An additional change is that overlayfs will now parse and resolve layers right when they are specified in fsconfig() instead of deferring until super block creation. This allows users to receive early errors. It also allows users to actually use up to 500 layers something which was theoretically possible but ended up not working due to the mount option string passed via mount(2) being too large. This also allows a more privileged process to set config options for a lesser privileged process as the creds for fsconfig() and the creds for fsopen() can differ. We could restrict that they match by enforcing that the creds of fsopen() and fsconfig() match but I don't see why that needs to be the case and allows for a good delegation mechanism. Plus, in the future it means we're able to extend overlayfs mount options and allow users to specify layers via file descriptors instead of paths: fsconfig(FSCONFIG_SET_PATH{_EMPTY}, "lowerdir", "lower1", dirfd); /* append */ fsconfig(FSCONFIG_SET_PATH{_EMPTY}, "lowerdir", "lower2", dirfd); /* append */ fsconfig(FSCONFIG_SET_PATH{_EMPTY}, "lowerdir", "lower3", dirfd); /* clear all layers specified until now */ fsconfig(FSCONFIG_SET_STRING, "lowerdir", NULL, 0); This would be especially nice if users create an overlayfs mount on top of idmapped layers or just in general private mounts created via open_tree(OPEN_TREE_CLONE). Those mounts would then never have to appear anywhere in the filesystem. But for now just do the minimal thing. We should probably aim to move more validation into ovl_fs_parse_param() so users get errors before fsconfig(FSCONFIG_CMD_CREATE). But that can be done in additional patches later. This is now also rebased on top of the lazy lowerdata lookup which allows the specificatin of data only layers using the new "::" syntax. The rules are simple. A data only layers cannot be followed by any regular layers and data layers must be preceeded by at least one regular layer. Parsing the lowerdir mount option must change because of this. The original patchset used the old lowerdir parsing function to split a lowerdir mount option string such as: lowerdir=/lower1:/lower2::/lower3::/lower4 simply replacing each non-escaped ":" by "\0". So sequences of non-escaped ":" were counted as layers. For example, the previous lowerdir mount option above would've counted 6 layers instead of 4 and a lowerdir mount option such as: lowerdir="/lower1:/lower2::/lower3::/lower4:::::::::::::::::::::::::::" would be counted as 33 layers. Other than being ugly this didn't matter much because kern_path() would reject the first "\0" layer. However, this overcounting of layers becomes problematic when we base allocations on it where we very much only want to allocate space for 4 layers instead of 33. So the new parsing function rejects non-escaped sequences of colons other than ":" and "::" immediately instead of relying on kern_path(). Link: https://github.com/util-linux/util-linux/issues/2287 Link: https://github.com/util-linux/util-linux/issues/1992 Link: https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/78702 Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-unionfs/20230530-klagen-zudem-32c0908c2108@brauner Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
2023-06-16 13:54:19 +00:00
/*
* Check whether upper path is read-only here to report failures
* early. Don't forget to recheck when the superblock is created
* as the mount attributes could change.
*/
if (upper) {
if (path->dentry->d_flags & DCACHE_OP_REAL)
return invalfc(fc, "filesystem on %s not supported as upperdir", name);
if (__mnt_is_readonly(path->mnt))
return invalfc(fc, "filesystem on %s is read-only", name);
} else {
if (ctx->lowerdir_all && layer != Opt_lowerdir)
return invalfc(fc, "lowerdir+ and datadir+ cannot follow lowerdir");
if (ctx->nr_data && layer == Opt_lowerdir_add)
return invalfc(fc, "regular lower layers cannot follow data layers");
if (ctx->nr == OVL_MAX_STACK)
return invalfc(fc, "too many lower directories, limit is %d",
OVL_MAX_STACK);
ovl: modify layer parameter parsing We ran into issues where mount(8) passed multiple lower layers as one big string through fsconfig(). But the fsconfig() FSCONFIG_SET_STRING option is limited to 256 bytes in strndup_user(). While this would be fixable by extending the fsconfig() buffer I'd rather encourage users to append layers via multiple fsconfig() calls as the interface allows nicely for this. This has also been requested as a feature before. With this port to the new mount api the following will be possible: fsconfig(fs_fd, FSCONFIG_SET_STRING, "lowerdir", "/lower1", 0); /* set upper layer */ fsconfig(fs_fd, FSCONFIG_SET_STRING, "upperdir", "/upper", 0); /* append "/lower2", "/lower3", and "/lower4" */ fsconfig(fs_fd, FSCONFIG_SET_STRING, "lowerdir", ":/lower2:/lower3:/lower4", 0); /* turn index feature on */ fsconfig(fs_fd, FSCONFIG_SET_STRING, "index", "on", 0); /* append "/lower5" */ fsconfig(fs_fd, FSCONFIG_SET_STRING, "lowerdir", ":/lower5", 0); Specifying ':' would have been rejected so this isn't a regression. And we can't simply use "lowerdir=/lower" to append on top of existing layers as "lowerdir=/lower,lowerdir=/other-lower" would make "/other-lower" the only lower layer so we'd break uapi if we changed this. So the ':' prefix seems a good compromise. Users can choose to specify multiple layers at once or individual layers. A layer is appended if it starts with ":". This requires that the user has already added at least one layer before. If lowerdir is specified again without a leading ":" then all previous layers are dropped and replaced with the new layers. If lowerdir is specified and empty than all layers are simply dropped. An additional change is that overlayfs will now parse and resolve layers right when they are specified in fsconfig() instead of deferring until super block creation. This allows users to receive early errors. It also allows users to actually use up to 500 layers something which was theoretically possible but ended up not working due to the mount option string passed via mount(2) being too large. This also allows a more privileged process to set config options for a lesser privileged process as the creds for fsconfig() and the creds for fsopen() can differ. We could restrict that they match by enforcing that the creds of fsopen() and fsconfig() match but I don't see why that needs to be the case and allows for a good delegation mechanism. Plus, in the future it means we're able to extend overlayfs mount options and allow users to specify layers via file descriptors instead of paths: fsconfig(FSCONFIG_SET_PATH{_EMPTY}, "lowerdir", "lower1", dirfd); /* append */ fsconfig(FSCONFIG_SET_PATH{_EMPTY}, "lowerdir", "lower2", dirfd); /* append */ fsconfig(FSCONFIG_SET_PATH{_EMPTY}, "lowerdir", "lower3", dirfd); /* clear all layers specified until now */ fsconfig(FSCONFIG_SET_STRING, "lowerdir", NULL, 0); This would be especially nice if users create an overlayfs mount on top of idmapped layers or just in general private mounts created via open_tree(OPEN_TREE_CLONE). Those mounts would then never have to appear anywhere in the filesystem. But for now just do the minimal thing. We should probably aim to move more validation into ovl_fs_parse_param() so users get errors before fsconfig(FSCONFIG_CMD_CREATE). But that can be done in additional patches later. This is now also rebased on top of the lazy lowerdata lookup which allows the specificatin of data only layers using the new "::" syntax. The rules are simple. A data only layers cannot be followed by any regular layers and data layers must be preceeded by at least one regular layer. Parsing the lowerdir mount option must change because of this. The original patchset used the old lowerdir parsing function to split a lowerdir mount option string such as: lowerdir=/lower1:/lower2::/lower3::/lower4 simply replacing each non-escaped ":" by "\0". So sequences of non-escaped ":" were counted as layers. For example, the previous lowerdir mount option above would've counted 6 layers instead of 4 and a lowerdir mount option such as: lowerdir="/lower1:/lower2::/lower3::/lower4:::::::::::::::::::::::::::" would be counted as 33 layers. Other than being ugly this didn't matter much because kern_path() would reject the first "\0" layer. However, this overcounting of layers becomes problematic when we base allocations on it where we very much only want to allocate space for 4 layers instead of 33. So the new parsing function rejects non-escaped sequences of colons other than ":" and "::" immediately instead of relying on kern_path(). Link: https://github.com/util-linux/util-linux/issues/2287 Link: https://github.com/util-linux/util-linux/issues/1992 Link: https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/78702 Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-unionfs/20230530-klagen-zudem-32c0908c2108@brauner Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
2023-06-16 13:54:19 +00:00
}
return 0;
}
ovl: modify layer parameter parsing We ran into issues where mount(8) passed multiple lower layers as one big string through fsconfig(). But the fsconfig() FSCONFIG_SET_STRING option is limited to 256 bytes in strndup_user(). While this would be fixable by extending the fsconfig() buffer I'd rather encourage users to append layers via multiple fsconfig() calls as the interface allows nicely for this. This has also been requested as a feature before. With this port to the new mount api the following will be possible: fsconfig(fs_fd, FSCONFIG_SET_STRING, "lowerdir", "/lower1", 0); /* set upper layer */ fsconfig(fs_fd, FSCONFIG_SET_STRING, "upperdir", "/upper", 0); /* append "/lower2", "/lower3", and "/lower4" */ fsconfig(fs_fd, FSCONFIG_SET_STRING, "lowerdir", ":/lower2:/lower3:/lower4", 0); /* turn index feature on */ fsconfig(fs_fd, FSCONFIG_SET_STRING, "index", "on", 0); /* append "/lower5" */ fsconfig(fs_fd, FSCONFIG_SET_STRING, "lowerdir", ":/lower5", 0); Specifying ':' would have been rejected so this isn't a regression. And we can't simply use "lowerdir=/lower" to append on top of existing layers as "lowerdir=/lower,lowerdir=/other-lower" would make "/other-lower" the only lower layer so we'd break uapi if we changed this. So the ':' prefix seems a good compromise. Users can choose to specify multiple layers at once or individual layers. A layer is appended if it starts with ":". This requires that the user has already added at least one layer before. If lowerdir is specified again without a leading ":" then all previous layers are dropped and replaced with the new layers. If lowerdir is specified and empty than all layers are simply dropped. An additional change is that overlayfs will now parse and resolve layers right when they are specified in fsconfig() instead of deferring until super block creation. This allows users to receive early errors. It also allows users to actually use up to 500 layers something which was theoretically possible but ended up not working due to the mount option string passed via mount(2) being too large. This also allows a more privileged process to set config options for a lesser privileged process as the creds for fsconfig() and the creds for fsopen() can differ. We could restrict that they match by enforcing that the creds of fsopen() and fsconfig() match but I don't see why that needs to be the case and allows for a good delegation mechanism. Plus, in the future it means we're able to extend overlayfs mount options and allow users to specify layers via file descriptors instead of paths: fsconfig(FSCONFIG_SET_PATH{_EMPTY}, "lowerdir", "lower1", dirfd); /* append */ fsconfig(FSCONFIG_SET_PATH{_EMPTY}, "lowerdir", "lower2", dirfd); /* append */ fsconfig(FSCONFIG_SET_PATH{_EMPTY}, "lowerdir", "lower3", dirfd); /* clear all layers specified until now */ fsconfig(FSCONFIG_SET_STRING, "lowerdir", NULL, 0); This would be especially nice if users create an overlayfs mount on top of idmapped layers or just in general private mounts created via open_tree(OPEN_TREE_CLONE). Those mounts would then never have to appear anywhere in the filesystem. But for now just do the minimal thing. We should probably aim to move more validation into ovl_fs_parse_param() so users get errors before fsconfig(FSCONFIG_CMD_CREATE). But that can be done in additional patches later. This is now also rebased on top of the lazy lowerdata lookup which allows the specificatin of data only layers using the new "::" syntax. The rules are simple. A data only layers cannot be followed by any regular layers and data layers must be preceeded by at least one regular layer. Parsing the lowerdir mount option must change because of this. The original patchset used the old lowerdir parsing function to split a lowerdir mount option string such as: lowerdir=/lower1:/lower2::/lower3::/lower4 simply replacing each non-escaped ":" by "\0". So sequences of non-escaped ":" were counted as layers. For example, the previous lowerdir mount option above would've counted 6 layers instead of 4 and a lowerdir mount option such as: lowerdir="/lower1:/lower2::/lower3::/lower4:::::::::::::::::::::::::::" would be counted as 33 layers. Other than being ugly this didn't matter much because kern_path() would reject the first "\0" layer. However, this overcounting of layers becomes problematic when we base allocations on it where we very much only want to allocate space for 4 layers instead of 33. So the new parsing function rejects non-escaped sequences of colons other than ":" and "::" immediately instead of relying on kern_path(). Link: https://github.com/util-linux/util-linux/issues/2287 Link: https://github.com/util-linux/util-linux/issues/1992 Link: https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/78702 Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-unionfs/20230530-klagen-zudem-32c0908c2108@brauner Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
2023-06-16 13:54:19 +00:00
static int ovl_ctx_realloc_lower(struct fs_context *fc)
{
struct ovl_fs_context *ctx = fc->fs_private;
struct ovl_fs_context_layer *l;
size_t nr;
if (ctx->nr < ctx->capacity)
return 0;
nr = min_t(size_t, max(4096 / sizeof(*l), ctx->capacity * 2),
OVL_MAX_STACK);
l = krealloc_array(ctx->lower, nr, sizeof(*l), GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT);
if (!l)
return -ENOMEM;
ctx->lower = l;
ctx->capacity = nr;
return 0;
}
static void ovl_add_layer(struct fs_context *fc, enum ovl_opt layer,
struct path *path, char **pname)
{
struct ovl_fs *ofs = fc->s_fs_info;
struct ovl_config *config = &ofs->config;
struct ovl_fs_context *ctx = fc->fs_private;
struct ovl_fs_context_layer *l;
ovl: modify layer parameter parsing We ran into issues where mount(8) passed multiple lower layers as one big string through fsconfig(). But the fsconfig() FSCONFIG_SET_STRING option is limited to 256 bytes in strndup_user(). While this would be fixable by extending the fsconfig() buffer I'd rather encourage users to append layers via multiple fsconfig() calls as the interface allows nicely for this. This has also been requested as a feature before. With this port to the new mount api the following will be possible: fsconfig(fs_fd, FSCONFIG_SET_STRING, "lowerdir", "/lower1", 0); /* set upper layer */ fsconfig(fs_fd, FSCONFIG_SET_STRING, "upperdir", "/upper", 0); /* append "/lower2", "/lower3", and "/lower4" */ fsconfig(fs_fd, FSCONFIG_SET_STRING, "lowerdir", ":/lower2:/lower3:/lower4", 0); /* turn index feature on */ fsconfig(fs_fd, FSCONFIG_SET_STRING, "index", "on", 0); /* append "/lower5" */ fsconfig(fs_fd, FSCONFIG_SET_STRING, "lowerdir", ":/lower5", 0); Specifying ':' would have been rejected so this isn't a regression. And we can't simply use "lowerdir=/lower" to append on top of existing layers as "lowerdir=/lower,lowerdir=/other-lower" would make "/other-lower" the only lower layer so we'd break uapi if we changed this. So the ':' prefix seems a good compromise. Users can choose to specify multiple layers at once or individual layers. A layer is appended if it starts with ":". This requires that the user has already added at least one layer before. If lowerdir is specified again without a leading ":" then all previous layers are dropped and replaced with the new layers. If lowerdir is specified and empty than all layers are simply dropped. An additional change is that overlayfs will now parse and resolve layers right when they are specified in fsconfig() instead of deferring until super block creation. This allows users to receive early errors. It also allows users to actually use up to 500 layers something which was theoretically possible but ended up not working due to the mount option string passed via mount(2) being too large. This also allows a more privileged process to set config options for a lesser privileged process as the creds for fsconfig() and the creds for fsopen() can differ. We could restrict that they match by enforcing that the creds of fsopen() and fsconfig() match but I don't see why that needs to be the case and allows for a good delegation mechanism. Plus, in the future it means we're able to extend overlayfs mount options and allow users to specify layers via file descriptors instead of paths: fsconfig(FSCONFIG_SET_PATH{_EMPTY}, "lowerdir", "lower1", dirfd); /* append */ fsconfig(FSCONFIG_SET_PATH{_EMPTY}, "lowerdir", "lower2", dirfd); /* append */ fsconfig(FSCONFIG_SET_PATH{_EMPTY}, "lowerdir", "lower3", dirfd); /* clear all layers specified until now */ fsconfig(FSCONFIG_SET_STRING, "lowerdir", NULL, 0); This would be especially nice if users create an overlayfs mount on top of idmapped layers or just in general private mounts created via open_tree(OPEN_TREE_CLONE). Those mounts would then never have to appear anywhere in the filesystem. But for now just do the minimal thing. We should probably aim to move more validation into ovl_fs_parse_param() so users get errors before fsconfig(FSCONFIG_CMD_CREATE). But that can be done in additional patches later. This is now also rebased on top of the lazy lowerdata lookup which allows the specificatin of data only layers using the new "::" syntax. The rules are simple. A data only layers cannot be followed by any regular layers and data layers must be preceeded by at least one regular layer. Parsing the lowerdir mount option must change because of this. The original patchset used the old lowerdir parsing function to split a lowerdir mount option string such as: lowerdir=/lower1:/lower2::/lower3::/lower4 simply replacing each non-escaped ":" by "\0". So sequences of non-escaped ":" were counted as layers. For example, the previous lowerdir mount option above would've counted 6 layers instead of 4 and a lowerdir mount option such as: lowerdir="/lower1:/lower2::/lower3::/lower4:::::::::::::::::::::::::::" would be counted as 33 layers. Other than being ugly this didn't matter much because kern_path() would reject the first "\0" layer. However, this overcounting of layers becomes problematic when we base allocations on it where we very much only want to allocate space for 4 layers instead of 33. So the new parsing function rejects non-escaped sequences of colons other than ":" and "::" immediately instead of relying on kern_path(). Link: https://github.com/util-linux/util-linux/issues/2287 Link: https://github.com/util-linux/util-linux/issues/1992 Link: https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/78702 Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-unionfs/20230530-klagen-zudem-32c0908c2108@brauner Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
2023-06-16 13:54:19 +00:00
switch (layer) {
case Opt_workdir:
swap(config->workdir, *pname);
swap(ctx->work, *path);
break;
case Opt_upperdir:
swap(config->upperdir, *pname);
swap(ctx->upper, *path);
break;
case Opt_datadir_add:
ctx->nr_data++;
fallthrough;
case Opt_lowerdir:
fallthrough;
case Opt_lowerdir_add:
WARN_ON(ctx->nr >= ctx->capacity);
l = &ctx->lower[ctx->nr++];
memset(l, 0, sizeof(*l));
swap(l->name, *pname);
swap(l->path, *path);
break;
default:
WARN_ON(1);
ovl: modify layer parameter parsing We ran into issues where mount(8) passed multiple lower layers as one big string through fsconfig(). But the fsconfig() FSCONFIG_SET_STRING option is limited to 256 bytes in strndup_user(). While this would be fixable by extending the fsconfig() buffer I'd rather encourage users to append layers via multiple fsconfig() calls as the interface allows nicely for this. This has also been requested as a feature before. With this port to the new mount api the following will be possible: fsconfig(fs_fd, FSCONFIG_SET_STRING, "lowerdir", "/lower1", 0); /* set upper layer */ fsconfig(fs_fd, FSCONFIG_SET_STRING, "upperdir", "/upper", 0); /* append "/lower2", "/lower3", and "/lower4" */ fsconfig(fs_fd, FSCONFIG_SET_STRING, "lowerdir", ":/lower2:/lower3:/lower4", 0); /* turn index feature on */ fsconfig(fs_fd, FSCONFIG_SET_STRING, "index", "on", 0); /* append "/lower5" */ fsconfig(fs_fd, FSCONFIG_SET_STRING, "lowerdir", ":/lower5", 0); Specifying ':' would have been rejected so this isn't a regression. And we can't simply use "lowerdir=/lower" to append on top of existing layers as "lowerdir=/lower,lowerdir=/other-lower" would make "/other-lower" the only lower layer so we'd break uapi if we changed this. So the ':' prefix seems a good compromise. Users can choose to specify multiple layers at once or individual layers. A layer is appended if it starts with ":". This requires that the user has already added at least one layer before. If lowerdir is specified again without a leading ":" then all previous layers are dropped and replaced with the new layers. If lowerdir is specified and empty than all layers are simply dropped. An additional change is that overlayfs will now parse and resolve layers right when they are specified in fsconfig() instead of deferring until super block creation. This allows users to receive early errors. It also allows users to actually use up to 500 layers something which was theoretically possible but ended up not working due to the mount option string passed via mount(2) being too large. This also allows a more privileged process to set config options for a lesser privileged process as the creds for fsconfig() and the creds for fsopen() can differ. We could restrict that they match by enforcing that the creds of fsopen() and fsconfig() match but I don't see why that needs to be the case and allows for a good delegation mechanism. Plus, in the future it means we're able to extend overlayfs mount options and allow users to specify layers via file descriptors instead of paths: fsconfig(FSCONFIG_SET_PATH{_EMPTY}, "lowerdir", "lower1", dirfd); /* append */ fsconfig(FSCONFIG_SET_PATH{_EMPTY}, "lowerdir", "lower2", dirfd); /* append */ fsconfig(FSCONFIG_SET_PATH{_EMPTY}, "lowerdir", "lower3", dirfd); /* clear all layers specified until now */ fsconfig(FSCONFIG_SET_STRING, "lowerdir", NULL, 0); This would be especially nice if users create an overlayfs mount on top of idmapped layers or just in general private mounts created via open_tree(OPEN_TREE_CLONE). Those mounts would then never have to appear anywhere in the filesystem. But for now just do the minimal thing. We should probably aim to move more validation into ovl_fs_parse_param() so users get errors before fsconfig(FSCONFIG_CMD_CREATE). But that can be done in additional patches later. This is now also rebased on top of the lazy lowerdata lookup which allows the specificatin of data only layers using the new "::" syntax. The rules are simple. A data only layers cannot be followed by any regular layers and data layers must be preceeded by at least one regular layer. Parsing the lowerdir mount option must change because of this. The original patchset used the old lowerdir parsing function to split a lowerdir mount option string such as: lowerdir=/lower1:/lower2::/lower3::/lower4 simply replacing each non-escaped ":" by "\0". So sequences of non-escaped ":" were counted as layers. For example, the previous lowerdir mount option above would've counted 6 layers instead of 4 and a lowerdir mount option such as: lowerdir="/lower1:/lower2::/lower3::/lower4:::::::::::::::::::::::::::" would be counted as 33 layers. Other than being ugly this didn't matter much because kern_path() would reject the first "\0" layer. However, this overcounting of layers becomes problematic when we base allocations on it where we very much only want to allocate space for 4 layers instead of 33. So the new parsing function rejects non-escaped sequences of colons other than ":" and "::" immediately instead of relying on kern_path(). Link: https://github.com/util-linux/util-linux/issues/2287 Link: https://github.com/util-linux/util-linux/issues/1992 Link: https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/78702 Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-unionfs/20230530-klagen-zudem-32c0908c2108@brauner Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
2023-06-16 13:54:19 +00:00
}
}
static inline bool is_upper_layer(enum ovl_opt layer)
{
return layer == Opt_upperdir || layer == Opt_workdir;
}
/* Handle non-file descriptor-based layer options that require path lookup. */
static inline int ovl_kern_path(const char *layer_name, struct path *layer_path,
enum ovl_opt layer)
{
int err;
switch (layer) {
case Opt_upperdir:
fallthrough;
case Opt_workdir:
fallthrough;
case Opt_lowerdir:
err = ovl_mount_dir(layer_name, layer_path);
break;
case Opt_lowerdir_add:
fallthrough;
case Opt_datadir_add:
err = ovl_mount_dir_noesc(layer_name, layer_path);
break;
default:
WARN_ON_ONCE(true);
err = -EINVAL;
}
return err;
}
static int ovl_do_parse_layer(struct fs_context *fc, const char *layer_name,
struct path *layer_path, enum ovl_opt layer)
{
char *name __free(kfree) = kstrdup(layer_name, GFP_KERNEL);
bool upper;
int err = 0;
if (!name)
return -ENOMEM;
upper = is_upper_layer(layer);
err = ovl_mount_dir_check(fc, layer_path, layer, name, upper);
if (err)
return err;
if (!upper) {
err = ovl_ctx_realloc_lower(fc);
if (err)
return err;
}
/* Store the user provided path string in ctx to show in mountinfo */
ovl_add_layer(fc, layer, layer_path, &name);
return err;
}
static int ovl_parse_layer(struct fs_context *fc, struct fs_parameter *param,
enum ovl_opt layer)
{
struct path layer_path __free(path_put) = {};
int err = 0;
switch (param->type) {
case fs_value_is_string:
err = ovl_kern_path(param->string, &layer_path, layer);
if (err)
return err;
err = ovl_do_parse_layer(fc, param->string, &layer_path, layer);
break;
case fs_value_is_file: {
char *buf __free(kfree);
char *layer_name;
buf = kmalloc(PATH_MAX, GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT);
if (!buf)
return -ENOMEM;
layer_path = param->file->f_path;
path_get(&layer_path);
layer_name = d_path(&layer_path, buf, PATH_MAX);
if (IS_ERR(layer_name))
return PTR_ERR(layer_name);
err = ovl_do_parse_layer(fc, layer_name, &layer_path, layer);
break;
}
default:
WARN_ON_ONCE(true);
err = -EINVAL;
}
return err;
ovl: modify layer parameter parsing We ran into issues where mount(8) passed multiple lower layers as one big string through fsconfig(). But the fsconfig() FSCONFIG_SET_STRING option is limited to 256 bytes in strndup_user(). While this would be fixable by extending the fsconfig() buffer I'd rather encourage users to append layers via multiple fsconfig() calls as the interface allows nicely for this. This has also been requested as a feature before. With this port to the new mount api the following will be possible: fsconfig(fs_fd, FSCONFIG_SET_STRING, "lowerdir", "/lower1", 0); /* set upper layer */ fsconfig(fs_fd, FSCONFIG_SET_STRING, "upperdir", "/upper", 0); /* append "/lower2", "/lower3", and "/lower4" */ fsconfig(fs_fd, FSCONFIG_SET_STRING, "lowerdir", ":/lower2:/lower3:/lower4", 0); /* turn index feature on */ fsconfig(fs_fd, FSCONFIG_SET_STRING, "index", "on", 0); /* append "/lower5" */ fsconfig(fs_fd, FSCONFIG_SET_STRING, "lowerdir", ":/lower5", 0); Specifying ':' would have been rejected so this isn't a regression. And we can't simply use "lowerdir=/lower" to append on top of existing layers as "lowerdir=/lower,lowerdir=/other-lower" would make "/other-lower" the only lower layer so we'd break uapi if we changed this. So the ':' prefix seems a good compromise. Users can choose to specify multiple layers at once or individual layers. A layer is appended if it starts with ":". This requires that the user has already added at least one layer before. If lowerdir is specified again without a leading ":" then all previous layers are dropped and replaced with the new layers. If lowerdir is specified and empty than all layers are simply dropped. An additional change is that overlayfs will now parse and resolve layers right when they are specified in fsconfig() instead of deferring until super block creation. This allows users to receive early errors. It also allows users to actually use up to 500 layers something which was theoretically possible but ended up not working due to the mount option string passed via mount(2) being too large. This also allows a more privileged process to set config options for a lesser privileged process as the creds for fsconfig() and the creds for fsopen() can differ. We could restrict that they match by enforcing that the creds of fsopen() and fsconfig() match but I don't see why that needs to be the case and allows for a good delegation mechanism. Plus, in the future it means we're able to extend overlayfs mount options and allow users to specify layers via file descriptors instead of paths: fsconfig(FSCONFIG_SET_PATH{_EMPTY}, "lowerdir", "lower1", dirfd); /* append */ fsconfig(FSCONFIG_SET_PATH{_EMPTY}, "lowerdir", "lower2", dirfd); /* append */ fsconfig(FSCONFIG_SET_PATH{_EMPTY}, "lowerdir", "lower3", dirfd); /* clear all layers specified until now */ fsconfig(FSCONFIG_SET_STRING, "lowerdir", NULL, 0); This would be especially nice if users create an overlayfs mount on top of idmapped layers or just in general private mounts created via open_tree(OPEN_TREE_CLONE). Those mounts would then never have to appear anywhere in the filesystem. But for now just do the minimal thing. We should probably aim to move more validation into ovl_fs_parse_param() so users get errors before fsconfig(FSCONFIG_CMD_CREATE). But that can be done in additional patches later. This is now also rebased on top of the lazy lowerdata lookup which allows the specificatin of data only layers using the new "::" syntax. The rules are simple. A data only layers cannot be followed by any regular layers and data layers must be preceeded by at least one regular layer. Parsing the lowerdir mount option must change because of this. The original patchset used the old lowerdir parsing function to split a lowerdir mount option string such as: lowerdir=/lower1:/lower2::/lower3::/lower4 simply replacing each non-escaped ":" by "\0". So sequences of non-escaped ":" were counted as layers. For example, the previous lowerdir mount option above would've counted 6 layers instead of 4 and a lowerdir mount option such as: lowerdir="/lower1:/lower2::/lower3::/lower4:::::::::::::::::::::::::::" would be counted as 33 layers. Other than being ugly this didn't matter much because kern_path() would reject the first "\0" layer. However, this overcounting of layers becomes problematic when we base allocations on it where we very much only want to allocate space for 4 layers instead of 33. So the new parsing function rejects non-escaped sequences of colons other than ":" and "::" immediately instead of relying on kern_path(). Link: https://github.com/util-linux/util-linux/issues/2287 Link: https://github.com/util-linux/util-linux/issues/1992 Link: https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/78702 Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-unionfs/20230530-klagen-zudem-32c0908c2108@brauner Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
2023-06-16 13:54:19 +00:00
}
static void ovl_reset_lowerdirs(struct ovl_fs_context *ctx)
ovl: modify layer parameter parsing We ran into issues where mount(8) passed multiple lower layers as one big string through fsconfig(). But the fsconfig() FSCONFIG_SET_STRING option is limited to 256 bytes in strndup_user(). While this would be fixable by extending the fsconfig() buffer I'd rather encourage users to append layers via multiple fsconfig() calls as the interface allows nicely for this. This has also been requested as a feature before. With this port to the new mount api the following will be possible: fsconfig(fs_fd, FSCONFIG_SET_STRING, "lowerdir", "/lower1", 0); /* set upper layer */ fsconfig(fs_fd, FSCONFIG_SET_STRING, "upperdir", "/upper", 0); /* append "/lower2", "/lower3", and "/lower4" */ fsconfig(fs_fd, FSCONFIG_SET_STRING, "lowerdir", ":/lower2:/lower3:/lower4", 0); /* turn index feature on */ fsconfig(fs_fd, FSCONFIG_SET_STRING, "index", "on", 0); /* append "/lower5" */ fsconfig(fs_fd, FSCONFIG_SET_STRING, "lowerdir", ":/lower5", 0); Specifying ':' would have been rejected so this isn't a regression. And we can't simply use "lowerdir=/lower" to append on top of existing layers as "lowerdir=/lower,lowerdir=/other-lower" would make "/other-lower" the only lower layer so we'd break uapi if we changed this. So the ':' prefix seems a good compromise. Users can choose to specify multiple layers at once or individual layers. A layer is appended if it starts with ":". This requires that the user has already added at least one layer before. If lowerdir is specified again without a leading ":" then all previous layers are dropped and replaced with the new layers. If lowerdir is specified and empty than all layers are simply dropped. An additional change is that overlayfs will now parse and resolve layers right when they are specified in fsconfig() instead of deferring until super block creation. This allows users to receive early errors. It also allows users to actually use up to 500 layers something which was theoretically possible but ended up not working due to the mount option string passed via mount(2) being too large. This also allows a more privileged process to set config options for a lesser privileged process as the creds for fsconfig() and the creds for fsopen() can differ. We could restrict that they match by enforcing that the creds of fsopen() and fsconfig() match but I don't see why that needs to be the case and allows for a good delegation mechanism. Plus, in the future it means we're able to extend overlayfs mount options and allow users to specify layers via file descriptors instead of paths: fsconfig(FSCONFIG_SET_PATH{_EMPTY}, "lowerdir", "lower1", dirfd); /* append */ fsconfig(FSCONFIG_SET_PATH{_EMPTY}, "lowerdir", "lower2", dirfd); /* append */ fsconfig(FSCONFIG_SET_PATH{_EMPTY}, "lowerdir", "lower3", dirfd); /* clear all layers specified until now */ fsconfig(FSCONFIG_SET_STRING, "lowerdir", NULL, 0); This would be especially nice if users create an overlayfs mount on top of idmapped layers or just in general private mounts created via open_tree(OPEN_TREE_CLONE). Those mounts would then never have to appear anywhere in the filesystem. But for now just do the minimal thing. We should probably aim to move more validation into ovl_fs_parse_param() so users get errors before fsconfig(FSCONFIG_CMD_CREATE). But that can be done in additional patches later. This is now also rebased on top of the lazy lowerdata lookup which allows the specificatin of data only layers using the new "::" syntax. The rules are simple. A data only layers cannot be followed by any regular layers and data layers must be preceeded by at least one regular layer. Parsing the lowerdir mount option must change because of this. The original patchset used the old lowerdir parsing function to split a lowerdir mount option string such as: lowerdir=/lower1:/lower2::/lower3::/lower4 simply replacing each non-escaped ":" by "\0". So sequences of non-escaped ":" were counted as layers. For example, the previous lowerdir mount option above would've counted 6 layers instead of 4 and a lowerdir mount option such as: lowerdir="/lower1:/lower2::/lower3::/lower4:::::::::::::::::::::::::::" would be counted as 33 layers. Other than being ugly this didn't matter much because kern_path() would reject the first "\0" layer. However, this overcounting of layers becomes problematic when we base allocations on it where we very much only want to allocate space for 4 layers instead of 33. So the new parsing function rejects non-escaped sequences of colons other than ":" and "::" immediately instead of relying on kern_path(). Link: https://github.com/util-linux/util-linux/issues/2287 Link: https://github.com/util-linux/util-linux/issues/1992 Link: https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/78702 Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-unionfs/20230530-klagen-zudem-32c0908c2108@brauner Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
2023-06-16 13:54:19 +00:00
{
struct ovl_fs_context_layer *l = ctx->lower;
// Reset old user provided lowerdir string
kfree(ctx->lowerdir_all);
ctx->lowerdir_all = NULL;
for (size_t nr = 0; nr < ctx->nr; nr++, l++) {
path_put(&l->path);
kfree(l->name);
l->name = NULL;
ovl: modify layer parameter parsing We ran into issues where mount(8) passed multiple lower layers as one big string through fsconfig(). But the fsconfig() FSCONFIG_SET_STRING option is limited to 256 bytes in strndup_user(). While this would be fixable by extending the fsconfig() buffer I'd rather encourage users to append layers via multiple fsconfig() calls as the interface allows nicely for this. This has also been requested as a feature before. With this port to the new mount api the following will be possible: fsconfig(fs_fd, FSCONFIG_SET_STRING, "lowerdir", "/lower1", 0); /* set upper layer */ fsconfig(fs_fd, FSCONFIG_SET_STRING, "upperdir", "/upper", 0); /* append "/lower2", "/lower3", and "/lower4" */ fsconfig(fs_fd, FSCONFIG_SET_STRING, "lowerdir", ":/lower2:/lower3:/lower4", 0); /* turn index feature on */ fsconfig(fs_fd, FSCONFIG_SET_STRING, "index", "on", 0); /* append "/lower5" */ fsconfig(fs_fd, FSCONFIG_SET_STRING, "lowerdir", ":/lower5", 0); Specifying ':' would have been rejected so this isn't a regression. And we can't simply use "lowerdir=/lower" to append on top of existing layers as "lowerdir=/lower,lowerdir=/other-lower" would make "/other-lower" the only lower layer so we'd break uapi if we changed this. So the ':' prefix seems a good compromise. Users can choose to specify multiple layers at once or individual layers. A layer is appended if it starts with ":". This requires that the user has already added at least one layer before. If lowerdir is specified again without a leading ":" then all previous layers are dropped and replaced with the new layers. If lowerdir is specified and empty than all layers are simply dropped. An additional change is that overlayfs will now parse and resolve layers right when they are specified in fsconfig() instead of deferring until super block creation. This allows users to receive early errors. It also allows users to actually use up to 500 layers something which was theoretically possible but ended up not working due to the mount option string passed via mount(2) being too large. This also allows a more privileged process to set config options for a lesser privileged process as the creds for fsconfig() and the creds for fsopen() can differ. We could restrict that they match by enforcing that the creds of fsopen() and fsconfig() match but I don't see why that needs to be the case and allows for a good delegation mechanism. Plus, in the future it means we're able to extend overlayfs mount options and allow users to specify layers via file descriptors instead of paths: fsconfig(FSCONFIG_SET_PATH{_EMPTY}, "lowerdir", "lower1", dirfd); /* append */ fsconfig(FSCONFIG_SET_PATH{_EMPTY}, "lowerdir", "lower2", dirfd); /* append */ fsconfig(FSCONFIG_SET_PATH{_EMPTY}, "lowerdir", "lower3", dirfd); /* clear all layers specified until now */ fsconfig(FSCONFIG_SET_STRING, "lowerdir", NULL, 0); This would be especially nice if users create an overlayfs mount on top of idmapped layers or just in general private mounts created via open_tree(OPEN_TREE_CLONE). Those mounts would then never have to appear anywhere in the filesystem. But for now just do the minimal thing. We should probably aim to move more validation into ovl_fs_parse_param() so users get errors before fsconfig(FSCONFIG_CMD_CREATE). But that can be done in additional patches later. This is now also rebased on top of the lazy lowerdata lookup which allows the specificatin of data only layers using the new "::" syntax. The rules are simple. A data only layers cannot be followed by any regular layers and data layers must be preceeded by at least one regular layer. Parsing the lowerdir mount option must change because of this. The original patchset used the old lowerdir parsing function to split a lowerdir mount option string such as: lowerdir=/lower1:/lower2::/lower3::/lower4 simply replacing each non-escaped ":" by "\0". So sequences of non-escaped ":" were counted as layers. For example, the previous lowerdir mount option above would've counted 6 layers instead of 4 and a lowerdir mount option such as: lowerdir="/lower1:/lower2::/lower3::/lower4:::::::::::::::::::::::::::" would be counted as 33 layers. Other than being ugly this didn't matter much because kern_path() would reject the first "\0" layer. However, this overcounting of layers becomes problematic when we base allocations on it where we very much only want to allocate space for 4 layers instead of 33. So the new parsing function rejects non-escaped sequences of colons other than ":" and "::" immediately instead of relying on kern_path(). Link: https://github.com/util-linux/util-linux/issues/2287 Link: https://github.com/util-linux/util-linux/issues/1992 Link: https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/78702 Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-unionfs/20230530-klagen-zudem-32c0908c2108@brauner Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
2023-06-16 13:54:19 +00:00
}
ctx->nr = 0;
ctx->nr_data = 0;
}
/*
* Parse lowerdir= mount option:
*
* e.g.: lowerdir=/lower1:/lower2:/lower3::/data1::/data2
ovl: modify layer parameter parsing We ran into issues where mount(8) passed multiple lower layers as one big string through fsconfig(). But the fsconfig() FSCONFIG_SET_STRING option is limited to 256 bytes in strndup_user(). While this would be fixable by extending the fsconfig() buffer I'd rather encourage users to append layers via multiple fsconfig() calls as the interface allows nicely for this. This has also been requested as a feature before. With this port to the new mount api the following will be possible: fsconfig(fs_fd, FSCONFIG_SET_STRING, "lowerdir", "/lower1", 0); /* set upper layer */ fsconfig(fs_fd, FSCONFIG_SET_STRING, "upperdir", "/upper", 0); /* append "/lower2", "/lower3", and "/lower4" */ fsconfig(fs_fd, FSCONFIG_SET_STRING, "lowerdir", ":/lower2:/lower3:/lower4", 0); /* turn index feature on */ fsconfig(fs_fd, FSCONFIG_SET_STRING, "index", "on", 0); /* append "/lower5" */ fsconfig(fs_fd, FSCONFIG_SET_STRING, "lowerdir", ":/lower5", 0); Specifying ':' would have been rejected so this isn't a regression. And we can't simply use "lowerdir=/lower" to append on top of existing layers as "lowerdir=/lower,lowerdir=/other-lower" would make "/other-lower" the only lower layer so we'd break uapi if we changed this. So the ':' prefix seems a good compromise. Users can choose to specify multiple layers at once or individual layers. A layer is appended if it starts with ":". This requires that the user has already added at least one layer before. If lowerdir is specified again without a leading ":" then all previous layers are dropped and replaced with the new layers. If lowerdir is specified and empty than all layers are simply dropped. An additional change is that overlayfs will now parse and resolve layers right when they are specified in fsconfig() instead of deferring until super block creation. This allows users to receive early errors. It also allows users to actually use up to 500 layers something which was theoretically possible but ended up not working due to the mount option string passed via mount(2) being too large. This also allows a more privileged process to set config options for a lesser privileged process as the creds for fsconfig() and the creds for fsopen() can differ. We could restrict that they match by enforcing that the creds of fsopen() and fsconfig() match but I don't see why that needs to be the case and allows for a good delegation mechanism. Plus, in the future it means we're able to extend overlayfs mount options and allow users to specify layers via file descriptors instead of paths: fsconfig(FSCONFIG_SET_PATH{_EMPTY}, "lowerdir", "lower1", dirfd); /* append */ fsconfig(FSCONFIG_SET_PATH{_EMPTY}, "lowerdir", "lower2", dirfd); /* append */ fsconfig(FSCONFIG_SET_PATH{_EMPTY}, "lowerdir", "lower3", dirfd); /* clear all layers specified until now */ fsconfig(FSCONFIG_SET_STRING, "lowerdir", NULL, 0); This would be especially nice if users create an overlayfs mount on top of idmapped layers or just in general private mounts created via open_tree(OPEN_TREE_CLONE). Those mounts would then never have to appear anywhere in the filesystem. But for now just do the minimal thing. We should probably aim to move more validation into ovl_fs_parse_param() so users get errors before fsconfig(FSCONFIG_CMD_CREATE). But that can be done in additional patches later. This is now also rebased on top of the lazy lowerdata lookup which allows the specificatin of data only layers using the new "::" syntax. The rules are simple. A data only layers cannot be followed by any regular layers and data layers must be preceeded by at least one regular layer. Parsing the lowerdir mount option must change because of this. The original patchset used the old lowerdir parsing function to split a lowerdir mount option string such as: lowerdir=/lower1:/lower2::/lower3::/lower4 simply replacing each non-escaped ":" by "\0". So sequences of non-escaped ":" were counted as layers. For example, the previous lowerdir mount option above would've counted 6 layers instead of 4 and a lowerdir mount option such as: lowerdir="/lower1:/lower2::/lower3::/lower4:::::::::::::::::::::::::::" would be counted as 33 layers. Other than being ugly this didn't matter much because kern_path() would reject the first "\0" layer. However, this overcounting of layers becomes problematic when we base allocations on it where we very much only want to allocate space for 4 layers instead of 33. So the new parsing function rejects non-escaped sequences of colons other than ":" and "::" immediately instead of relying on kern_path(). Link: https://github.com/util-linux/util-linux/issues/2287 Link: https://github.com/util-linux/util-linux/issues/1992 Link: https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/78702 Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-unionfs/20230530-klagen-zudem-32c0908c2108@brauner Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
2023-06-16 13:54:19 +00:00
* Set "/lower1", "/lower2", and "/lower3" as lower layers and
* "/data1" and "/data2" as data lower layers. Any existing lower
* layers are replaced.
*/
static int ovl_parse_param_lowerdir(const char *name, struct fs_context *fc)
ovl: modify layer parameter parsing We ran into issues where mount(8) passed multiple lower layers as one big string through fsconfig(). But the fsconfig() FSCONFIG_SET_STRING option is limited to 256 bytes in strndup_user(). While this would be fixable by extending the fsconfig() buffer I'd rather encourage users to append layers via multiple fsconfig() calls as the interface allows nicely for this. This has also been requested as a feature before. With this port to the new mount api the following will be possible: fsconfig(fs_fd, FSCONFIG_SET_STRING, "lowerdir", "/lower1", 0); /* set upper layer */ fsconfig(fs_fd, FSCONFIG_SET_STRING, "upperdir", "/upper", 0); /* append "/lower2", "/lower3", and "/lower4" */ fsconfig(fs_fd, FSCONFIG_SET_STRING, "lowerdir", ":/lower2:/lower3:/lower4", 0); /* turn index feature on */ fsconfig(fs_fd, FSCONFIG_SET_STRING, "index", "on", 0); /* append "/lower5" */ fsconfig(fs_fd, FSCONFIG_SET_STRING, "lowerdir", ":/lower5", 0); Specifying ':' would have been rejected so this isn't a regression. And we can't simply use "lowerdir=/lower" to append on top of existing layers as "lowerdir=/lower,lowerdir=/other-lower" would make "/other-lower" the only lower layer so we'd break uapi if we changed this. So the ':' prefix seems a good compromise. Users can choose to specify multiple layers at once or individual layers. A layer is appended if it starts with ":". This requires that the user has already added at least one layer before. If lowerdir is specified again without a leading ":" then all previous layers are dropped and replaced with the new layers. If lowerdir is specified and empty than all layers are simply dropped. An additional change is that overlayfs will now parse and resolve layers right when they are specified in fsconfig() instead of deferring until super block creation. This allows users to receive early errors. It also allows users to actually use up to 500 layers something which was theoretically possible but ended up not working due to the mount option string passed via mount(2) being too large. This also allows a more privileged process to set config options for a lesser privileged process as the creds for fsconfig() and the creds for fsopen() can differ. We could restrict that they match by enforcing that the creds of fsopen() and fsconfig() match but I don't see why that needs to be the case and allows for a good delegation mechanism. Plus, in the future it means we're able to extend overlayfs mount options and allow users to specify layers via file descriptors instead of paths: fsconfig(FSCONFIG_SET_PATH{_EMPTY}, "lowerdir", "lower1", dirfd); /* append */ fsconfig(FSCONFIG_SET_PATH{_EMPTY}, "lowerdir", "lower2", dirfd); /* append */ fsconfig(FSCONFIG_SET_PATH{_EMPTY}, "lowerdir", "lower3", dirfd); /* clear all layers specified until now */ fsconfig(FSCONFIG_SET_STRING, "lowerdir", NULL, 0); This would be especially nice if users create an overlayfs mount on top of idmapped layers or just in general private mounts created via open_tree(OPEN_TREE_CLONE). Those mounts would then never have to appear anywhere in the filesystem. But for now just do the minimal thing. We should probably aim to move more validation into ovl_fs_parse_param() so users get errors before fsconfig(FSCONFIG_CMD_CREATE). But that can be done in additional patches later. This is now also rebased on top of the lazy lowerdata lookup which allows the specificatin of data only layers using the new "::" syntax. The rules are simple. A data only layers cannot be followed by any regular layers and data layers must be preceeded by at least one regular layer. Parsing the lowerdir mount option must change because of this. The original patchset used the old lowerdir parsing function to split a lowerdir mount option string such as: lowerdir=/lower1:/lower2::/lower3::/lower4 simply replacing each non-escaped ":" by "\0". So sequences of non-escaped ":" were counted as layers. For example, the previous lowerdir mount option above would've counted 6 layers instead of 4 and a lowerdir mount option such as: lowerdir="/lower1:/lower2::/lower3::/lower4:::::::::::::::::::::::::::" would be counted as 33 layers. Other than being ugly this didn't matter much because kern_path() would reject the first "\0" layer. However, this overcounting of layers becomes problematic when we base allocations on it where we very much only want to allocate space for 4 layers instead of 33. So the new parsing function rejects non-escaped sequences of colons other than ":" and "::" immediately instead of relying on kern_path(). Link: https://github.com/util-linux/util-linux/issues/2287 Link: https://github.com/util-linux/util-linux/issues/1992 Link: https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/78702 Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-unionfs/20230530-klagen-zudem-32c0908c2108@brauner Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
2023-06-16 13:54:19 +00:00
{
int err;
struct ovl_fs_context *ctx = fc->fs_private;
char *dup = NULL, *iter;
ssize_t nr_lower, nr;
bool data_layer = false;
ovl: modify layer parameter parsing We ran into issues where mount(8) passed multiple lower layers as one big string through fsconfig(). But the fsconfig() FSCONFIG_SET_STRING option is limited to 256 bytes in strndup_user(). While this would be fixable by extending the fsconfig() buffer I'd rather encourage users to append layers via multiple fsconfig() calls as the interface allows nicely for this. This has also been requested as a feature before. With this port to the new mount api the following will be possible: fsconfig(fs_fd, FSCONFIG_SET_STRING, "lowerdir", "/lower1", 0); /* set upper layer */ fsconfig(fs_fd, FSCONFIG_SET_STRING, "upperdir", "/upper", 0); /* append "/lower2", "/lower3", and "/lower4" */ fsconfig(fs_fd, FSCONFIG_SET_STRING, "lowerdir", ":/lower2:/lower3:/lower4", 0); /* turn index feature on */ fsconfig(fs_fd, FSCONFIG_SET_STRING, "index", "on", 0); /* append "/lower5" */ fsconfig(fs_fd, FSCONFIG_SET_STRING, "lowerdir", ":/lower5", 0); Specifying ':' would have been rejected so this isn't a regression. And we can't simply use "lowerdir=/lower" to append on top of existing layers as "lowerdir=/lower,lowerdir=/other-lower" would make "/other-lower" the only lower layer so we'd break uapi if we changed this. So the ':' prefix seems a good compromise. Users can choose to specify multiple layers at once or individual layers. A layer is appended if it starts with ":". This requires that the user has already added at least one layer before. If lowerdir is specified again without a leading ":" then all previous layers are dropped and replaced with the new layers. If lowerdir is specified and empty than all layers are simply dropped. An additional change is that overlayfs will now parse and resolve layers right when they are specified in fsconfig() instead of deferring until super block creation. This allows users to receive early errors. It also allows users to actually use up to 500 layers something which was theoretically possible but ended up not working due to the mount option string passed via mount(2) being too large. This also allows a more privileged process to set config options for a lesser privileged process as the creds for fsconfig() and the creds for fsopen() can differ. We could restrict that they match by enforcing that the creds of fsopen() and fsconfig() match but I don't see why that needs to be the case and allows for a good delegation mechanism. Plus, in the future it means we're able to extend overlayfs mount options and allow users to specify layers via file descriptors instead of paths: fsconfig(FSCONFIG_SET_PATH{_EMPTY}, "lowerdir", "lower1", dirfd); /* append */ fsconfig(FSCONFIG_SET_PATH{_EMPTY}, "lowerdir", "lower2", dirfd); /* append */ fsconfig(FSCONFIG_SET_PATH{_EMPTY}, "lowerdir", "lower3", dirfd); /* clear all layers specified until now */ fsconfig(FSCONFIG_SET_STRING, "lowerdir", NULL, 0); This would be especially nice if users create an overlayfs mount on top of idmapped layers or just in general private mounts created via open_tree(OPEN_TREE_CLONE). Those mounts would then never have to appear anywhere in the filesystem. But for now just do the minimal thing. We should probably aim to move more validation into ovl_fs_parse_param() so users get errors before fsconfig(FSCONFIG_CMD_CREATE). But that can be done in additional patches later. This is now also rebased on top of the lazy lowerdata lookup which allows the specificatin of data only layers using the new "::" syntax. The rules are simple. A data only layers cannot be followed by any regular layers and data layers must be preceeded by at least one regular layer. Parsing the lowerdir mount option must change because of this. The original patchset used the old lowerdir parsing function to split a lowerdir mount option string such as: lowerdir=/lower1:/lower2::/lower3::/lower4 simply replacing each non-escaped ":" by "\0". So sequences of non-escaped ":" were counted as layers. For example, the previous lowerdir mount option above would've counted 6 layers instead of 4 and a lowerdir mount option such as: lowerdir="/lower1:/lower2::/lower3::/lower4:::::::::::::::::::::::::::" would be counted as 33 layers. Other than being ugly this didn't matter much because kern_path() would reject the first "\0" layer. However, this overcounting of layers becomes problematic when we base allocations on it where we very much only want to allocate space for 4 layers instead of 33. So the new parsing function rejects non-escaped sequences of colons other than ":" and "::" immediately instead of relying on kern_path(). Link: https://github.com/util-linux/util-linux/issues/2287 Link: https://github.com/util-linux/util-linux/issues/1992 Link: https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/78702 Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-unionfs/20230530-klagen-zudem-32c0908c2108@brauner Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
2023-06-16 13:54:19 +00:00
/*
* Ensure we're backwards compatible with mount(2)
* by allowing relative paths.
*/
/* drop all existing lower layers */
ovl_reset_lowerdirs(ctx);
if (!*name)
ovl: modify layer parameter parsing We ran into issues where mount(8) passed multiple lower layers as one big string through fsconfig(). But the fsconfig() FSCONFIG_SET_STRING option is limited to 256 bytes in strndup_user(). While this would be fixable by extending the fsconfig() buffer I'd rather encourage users to append layers via multiple fsconfig() calls as the interface allows nicely for this. This has also been requested as a feature before. With this port to the new mount api the following will be possible: fsconfig(fs_fd, FSCONFIG_SET_STRING, "lowerdir", "/lower1", 0); /* set upper layer */ fsconfig(fs_fd, FSCONFIG_SET_STRING, "upperdir", "/upper", 0); /* append "/lower2", "/lower3", and "/lower4" */ fsconfig(fs_fd, FSCONFIG_SET_STRING, "lowerdir", ":/lower2:/lower3:/lower4", 0); /* turn index feature on */ fsconfig(fs_fd, FSCONFIG_SET_STRING, "index", "on", 0); /* append "/lower5" */ fsconfig(fs_fd, FSCONFIG_SET_STRING, "lowerdir", ":/lower5", 0); Specifying ':' would have been rejected so this isn't a regression. And we can't simply use "lowerdir=/lower" to append on top of existing layers as "lowerdir=/lower,lowerdir=/other-lower" would make "/other-lower" the only lower layer so we'd break uapi if we changed this. So the ':' prefix seems a good compromise. Users can choose to specify multiple layers at once or individual layers. A layer is appended if it starts with ":". This requires that the user has already added at least one layer before. If lowerdir is specified again without a leading ":" then all previous layers are dropped and replaced with the new layers. If lowerdir is specified and empty than all layers are simply dropped. An additional change is that overlayfs will now parse and resolve layers right when they are specified in fsconfig() instead of deferring until super block creation. This allows users to receive early errors. It also allows users to actually use up to 500 layers something which was theoretically possible but ended up not working due to the mount option string passed via mount(2) being too large. This also allows a more privileged process to set config options for a lesser privileged process as the creds for fsconfig() and the creds for fsopen() can differ. We could restrict that they match by enforcing that the creds of fsopen() and fsconfig() match but I don't see why that needs to be the case and allows for a good delegation mechanism. Plus, in the future it means we're able to extend overlayfs mount options and allow users to specify layers via file descriptors instead of paths: fsconfig(FSCONFIG_SET_PATH{_EMPTY}, "lowerdir", "lower1", dirfd); /* append */ fsconfig(FSCONFIG_SET_PATH{_EMPTY}, "lowerdir", "lower2", dirfd); /* append */ fsconfig(FSCONFIG_SET_PATH{_EMPTY}, "lowerdir", "lower3", dirfd); /* clear all layers specified until now */ fsconfig(FSCONFIG_SET_STRING, "lowerdir", NULL, 0); This would be especially nice if users create an overlayfs mount on top of idmapped layers or just in general private mounts created via open_tree(OPEN_TREE_CLONE). Those mounts would then never have to appear anywhere in the filesystem. But for now just do the minimal thing. We should probably aim to move more validation into ovl_fs_parse_param() so users get errors before fsconfig(FSCONFIG_CMD_CREATE). But that can be done in additional patches later. This is now also rebased on top of the lazy lowerdata lookup which allows the specificatin of data only layers using the new "::" syntax. The rules are simple. A data only layers cannot be followed by any regular layers and data layers must be preceeded by at least one regular layer. Parsing the lowerdir mount option must change because of this. The original patchset used the old lowerdir parsing function to split a lowerdir mount option string such as: lowerdir=/lower1:/lower2::/lower3::/lower4 simply replacing each non-escaped ":" by "\0". So sequences of non-escaped ":" were counted as layers. For example, the previous lowerdir mount option above would've counted 6 layers instead of 4 and a lowerdir mount option such as: lowerdir="/lower1:/lower2::/lower3::/lower4:::::::::::::::::::::::::::" would be counted as 33 layers. Other than being ugly this didn't matter much because kern_path() would reject the first "\0" layer. However, this overcounting of layers becomes problematic when we base allocations on it where we very much only want to allocate space for 4 layers instead of 33. So the new parsing function rejects non-escaped sequences of colons other than ":" and "::" immediately instead of relying on kern_path(). Link: https://github.com/util-linux/util-linux/issues/2287 Link: https://github.com/util-linux/util-linux/issues/1992 Link: https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/78702 Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-unionfs/20230530-klagen-zudem-32c0908c2108@brauner Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
2023-06-16 13:54:19 +00:00
return 0;
if (*name == ':') {
pr_err("cannot append lower layer\n");
return -EINVAL;
ovl: modify layer parameter parsing We ran into issues where mount(8) passed multiple lower layers as one big string through fsconfig(). But the fsconfig() FSCONFIG_SET_STRING option is limited to 256 bytes in strndup_user(). While this would be fixable by extending the fsconfig() buffer I'd rather encourage users to append layers via multiple fsconfig() calls as the interface allows nicely for this. This has also been requested as a feature before. With this port to the new mount api the following will be possible: fsconfig(fs_fd, FSCONFIG_SET_STRING, "lowerdir", "/lower1", 0); /* set upper layer */ fsconfig(fs_fd, FSCONFIG_SET_STRING, "upperdir", "/upper", 0); /* append "/lower2", "/lower3", and "/lower4" */ fsconfig(fs_fd, FSCONFIG_SET_STRING, "lowerdir", ":/lower2:/lower3:/lower4", 0); /* turn index feature on */ fsconfig(fs_fd, FSCONFIG_SET_STRING, "index", "on", 0); /* append "/lower5" */ fsconfig(fs_fd, FSCONFIG_SET_STRING, "lowerdir", ":/lower5", 0); Specifying ':' would have been rejected so this isn't a regression. And we can't simply use "lowerdir=/lower" to append on top of existing layers as "lowerdir=/lower,lowerdir=/other-lower" would make "/other-lower" the only lower layer so we'd break uapi if we changed this. So the ':' prefix seems a good compromise. Users can choose to specify multiple layers at once or individual layers. A layer is appended if it starts with ":". This requires that the user has already added at least one layer before. If lowerdir is specified again without a leading ":" then all previous layers are dropped and replaced with the new layers. If lowerdir is specified and empty than all layers are simply dropped. An additional change is that overlayfs will now parse and resolve layers right when they are specified in fsconfig() instead of deferring until super block creation. This allows users to receive early errors. It also allows users to actually use up to 500 layers something which was theoretically possible but ended up not working due to the mount option string passed via mount(2) being too large. This also allows a more privileged process to set config options for a lesser privileged process as the creds for fsconfig() and the creds for fsopen() can differ. We could restrict that they match by enforcing that the creds of fsopen() and fsconfig() match but I don't see why that needs to be the case and allows for a good delegation mechanism. Plus, in the future it means we're able to extend overlayfs mount options and allow users to specify layers via file descriptors instead of paths: fsconfig(FSCONFIG_SET_PATH{_EMPTY}, "lowerdir", "lower1", dirfd); /* append */ fsconfig(FSCONFIG_SET_PATH{_EMPTY}, "lowerdir", "lower2", dirfd); /* append */ fsconfig(FSCONFIG_SET_PATH{_EMPTY}, "lowerdir", "lower3", dirfd); /* clear all layers specified until now */ fsconfig(FSCONFIG_SET_STRING, "lowerdir", NULL, 0); This would be especially nice if users create an overlayfs mount on top of idmapped layers or just in general private mounts created via open_tree(OPEN_TREE_CLONE). Those mounts would then never have to appear anywhere in the filesystem. But for now just do the minimal thing. We should probably aim to move more validation into ovl_fs_parse_param() so users get errors before fsconfig(FSCONFIG_CMD_CREATE). But that can be done in additional patches later. This is now also rebased on top of the lazy lowerdata lookup which allows the specificatin of data only layers using the new "::" syntax. The rules are simple. A data only layers cannot be followed by any regular layers and data layers must be preceeded by at least one regular layer. Parsing the lowerdir mount option must change because of this. The original patchset used the old lowerdir parsing function to split a lowerdir mount option string such as: lowerdir=/lower1:/lower2::/lower3::/lower4 simply replacing each non-escaped ":" by "\0". So sequences of non-escaped ":" were counted as layers. For example, the previous lowerdir mount option above would've counted 6 layers instead of 4 and a lowerdir mount option such as: lowerdir="/lower1:/lower2::/lower3::/lower4:::::::::::::::::::::::::::" would be counted as 33 layers. Other than being ugly this didn't matter much because kern_path() would reject the first "\0" layer. However, this overcounting of layers becomes problematic when we base allocations on it where we very much only want to allocate space for 4 layers instead of 33. So the new parsing function rejects non-escaped sequences of colons other than ":" and "::" immediately instead of relying on kern_path(). Link: https://github.com/util-linux/util-linux/issues/2287 Link: https://github.com/util-linux/util-linux/issues/1992 Link: https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/78702 Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-unionfs/20230530-klagen-zudem-32c0908c2108@brauner Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
2023-06-16 13:54:19 +00:00
}
// Store user provided lowerdir string to show in mount options
ctx->lowerdir_all = kstrdup(name, GFP_KERNEL);
if (!ctx->lowerdir_all)
return -ENOMEM;
ovl: modify layer parameter parsing We ran into issues where mount(8) passed multiple lower layers as one big string through fsconfig(). But the fsconfig() FSCONFIG_SET_STRING option is limited to 256 bytes in strndup_user(). While this would be fixable by extending the fsconfig() buffer I'd rather encourage users to append layers via multiple fsconfig() calls as the interface allows nicely for this. This has also been requested as a feature before. With this port to the new mount api the following will be possible: fsconfig(fs_fd, FSCONFIG_SET_STRING, "lowerdir", "/lower1", 0); /* set upper layer */ fsconfig(fs_fd, FSCONFIG_SET_STRING, "upperdir", "/upper", 0); /* append "/lower2", "/lower3", and "/lower4" */ fsconfig(fs_fd, FSCONFIG_SET_STRING, "lowerdir", ":/lower2:/lower3:/lower4", 0); /* turn index feature on */ fsconfig(fs_fd, FSCONFIG_SET_STRING, "index", "on", 0); /* append "/lower5" */ fsconfig(fs_fd, FSCONFIG_SET_STRING, "lowerdir", ":/lower5", 0); Specifying ':' would have been rejected so this isn't a regression. And we can't simply use "lowerdir=/lower" to append on top of existing layers as "lowerdir=/lower,lowerdir=/other-lower" would make "/other-lower" the only lower layer so we'd break uapi if we changed this. So the ':' prefix seems a good compromise. Users can choose to specify multiple layers at once or individual layers. A layer is appended if it starts with ":". This requires that the user has already added at least one layer before. If lowerdir is specified again without a leading ":" then all previous layers are dropped and replaced with the new layers. If lowerdir is specified and empty than all layers are simply dropped. An additional change is that overlayfs will now parse and resolve layers right when they are specified in fsconfig() instead of deferring until super block creation. This allows users to receive early errors. It also allows users to actually use up to 500 layers something which was theoretically possible but ended up not working due to the mount option string passed via mount(2) being too large. This also allows a more privileged process to set config options for a lesser privileged process as the creds for fsconfig() and the creds for fsopen() can differ. We could restrict that they match by enforcing that the creds of fsopen() and fsconfig() match but I don't see why that needs to be the case and allows for a good delegation mechanism. Plus, in the future it means we're able to extend overlayfs mount options and allow users to specify layers via file descriptors instead of paths: fsconfig(FSCONFIG_SET_PATH{_EMPTY}, "lowerdir", "lower1", dirfd); /* append */ fsconfig(FSCONFIG_SET_PATH{_EMPTY}, "lowerdir", "lower2", dirfd); /* append */ fsconfig(FSCONFIG_SET_PATH{_EMPTY}, "lowerdir", "lower3", dirfd); /* clear all layers specified until now */ fsconfig(FSCONFIG_SET_STRING, "lowerdir", NULL, 0); This would be especially nice if users create an overlayfs mount on top of idmapped layers or just in general private mounts created via open_tree(OPEN_TREE_CLONE). Those mounts would then never have to appear anywhere in the filesystem. But for now just do the minimal thing. We should probably aim to move more validation into ovl_fs_parse_param() so users get errors before fsconfig(FSCONFIG_CMD_CREATE). But that can be done in additional patches later. This is now also rebased on top of the lazy lowerdata lookup which allows the specificatin of data only layers using the new "::" syntax. The rules are simple. A data only layers cannot be followed by any regular layers and data layers must be preceeded by at least one regular layer. Parsing the lowerdir mount option must change because of this. The original patchset used the old lowerdir parsing function to split a lowerdir mount option string such as: lowerdir=/lower1:/lower2::/lower3::/lower4 simply replacing each non-escaped ":" by "\0". So sequences of non-escaped ":" were counted as layers. For example, the previous lowerdir mount option above would've counted 6 layers instead of 4 and a lowerdir mount option such as: lowerdir="/lower1:/lower2::/lower3::/lower4:::::::::::::::::::::::::::" would be counted as 33 layers. Other than being ugly this didn't matter much because kern_path() would reject the first "\0" layer. However, this overcounting of layers becomes problematic when we base allocations on it where we very much only want to allocate space for 4 layers instead of 33. So the new parsing function rejects non-escaped sequences of colons other than ":" and "::" immediately instead of relying on kern_path(). Link: https://github.com/util-linux/util-linux/issues/2287 Link: https://github.com/util-linux/util-linux/issues/1992 Link: https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/78702 Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-unionfs/20230530-klagen-zudem-32c0908c2108@brauner Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
2023-06-16 13:54:19 +00:00
dup = kstrdup(name, GFP_KERNEL);
if (!dup)
return -ENOMEM;
err = -EINVAL;
nr_lower = ovl_parse_param_split_lowerdirs(dup);
if (nr_lower < 0)
goto out_err;
if (nr_lower > OVL_MAX_STACK) {
ovl: modify layer parameter parsing We ran into issues where mount(8) passed multiple lower layers as one big string through fsconfig(). But the fsconfig() FSCONFIG_SET_STRING option is limited to 256 bytes in strndup_user(). While this would be fixable by extending the fsconfig() buffer I'd rather encourage users to append layers via multiple fsconfig() calls as the interface allows nicely for this. This has also been requested as a feature before. With this port to the new mount api the following will be possible: fsconfig(fs_fd, FSCONFIG_SET_STRING, "lowerdir", "/lower1", 0); /* set upper layer */ fsconfig(fs_fd, FSCONFIG_SET_STRING, "upperdir", "/upper", 0); /* append "/lower2", "/lower3", and "/lower4" */ fsconfig(fs_fd, FSCONFIG_SET_STRING, "lowerdir", ":/lower2:/lower3:/lower4", 0); /* turn index feature on */ fsconfig(fs_fd, FSCONFIG_SET_STRING, "index", "on", 0); /* append "/lower5" */ fsconfig(fs_fd, FSCONFIG_SET_STRING, "lowerdir", ":/lower5", 0); Specifying ':' would have been rejected so this isn't a regression. And we can't simply use "lowerdir=/lower" to append on top of existing layers as "lowerdir=/lower,lowerdir=/other-lower" would make "/other-lower" the only lower layer so we'd break uapi if we changed this. So the ':' prefix seems a good compromise. Users can choose to specify multiple layers at once or individual layers. A layer is appended if it starts with ":". This requires that the user has already added at least one layer before. If lowerdir is specified again without a leading ":" then all previous layers are dropped and replaced with the new layers. If lowerdir is specified and empty than all layers are simply dropped. An additional change is that overlayfs will now parse and resolve layers right when they are specified in fsconfig() instead of deferring until super block creation. This allows users to receive early errors. It also allows users to actually use up to 500 layers something which was theoretically possible but ended up not working due to the mount option string passed via mount(2) being too large. This also allows a more privileged process to set config options for a lesser privileged process as the creds for fsconfig() and the creds for fsopen() can differ. We could restrict that they match by enforcing that the creds of fsopen() and fsconfig() match but I don't see why that needs to be the case and allows for a good delegation mechanism. Plus, in the future it means we're able to extend overlayfs mount options and allow users to specify layers via file descriptors instead of paths: fsconfig(FSCONFIG_SET_PATH{_EMPTY}, "lowerdir", "lower1", dirfd); /* append */ fsconfig(FSCONFIG_SET_PATH{_EMPTY}, "lowerdir", "lower2", dirfd); /* append */ fsconfig(FSCONFIG_SET_PATH{_EMPTY}, "lowerdir", "lower3", dirfd); /* clear all layers specified until now */ fsconfig(FSCONFIG_SET_STRING, "lowerdir", NULL, 0); This would be especially nice if users create an overlayfs mount on top of idmapped layers or just in general private mounts created via open_tree(OPEN_TREE_CLONE). Those mounts would then never have to appear anywhere in the filesystem. But for now just do the minimal thing. We should probably aim to move more validation into ovl_fs_parse_param() so users get errors before fsconfig(FSCONFIG_CMD_CREATE). But that can be done in additional patches later. This is now also rebased on top of the lazy lowerdata lookup which allows the specificatin of data only layers using the new "::" syntax. The rules are simple. A data only layers cannot be followed by any regular layers and data layers must be preceeded by at least one regular layer. Parsing the lowerdir mount option must change because of this. The original patchset used the old lowerdir parsing function to split a lowerdir mount option string such as: lowerdir=/lower1:/lower2::/lower3::/lower4 simply replacing each non-escaped ":" by "\0". So sequences of non-escaped ":" were counted as layers. For example, the previous lowerdir mount option above would've counted 6 layers instead of 4 and a lowerdir mount option such as: lowerdir="/lower1:/lower2::/lower3::/lower4:::::::::::::::::::::::::::" would be counted as 33 layers. Other than being ugly this didn't matter much because kern_path() would reject the first "\0" layer. However, this overcounting of layers becomes problematic when we base allocations on it where we very much only want to allocate space for 4 layers instead of 33. So the new parsing function rejects non-escaped sequences of colons other than ":" and "::" immediately instead of relying on kern_path(). Link: https://github.com/util-linux/util-linux/issues/2287 Link: https://github.com/util-linux/util-linux/issues/1992 Link: https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/78702 Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-unionfs/20230530-klagen-zudem-32c0908c2108@brauner Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
2023-06-16 13:54:19 +00:00
pr_err("too many lower directories, limit is %d\n", OVL_MAX_STACK);
goto out_err;
}
iter = dup;
for (nr = 0; nr < nr_lower; nr++) {
struct path path __free(path_put) = {};
err = ovl_kern_path(iter, &path, Opt_lowerdir);
if (err)
goto out_err;
err = ovl_do_parse_layer(fc, iter, &path, Opt_lowerdir);
ovl: modify layer parameter parsing We ran into issues where mount(8) passed multiple lower layers as one big string through fsconfig(). But the fsconfig() FSCONFIG_SET_STRING option is limited to 256 bytes in strndup_user(). While this would be fixable by extending the fsconfig() buffer I'd rather encourage users to append layers via multiple fsconfig() calls as the interface allows nicely for this. This has also been requested as a feature before. With this port to the new mount api the following will be possible: fsconfig(fs_fd, FSCONFIG_SET_STRING, "lowerdir", "/lower1", 0); /* set upper layer */ fsconfig(fs_fd, FSCONFIG_SET_STRING, "upperdir", "/upper", 0); /* append "/lower2", "/lower3", and "/lower4" */ fsconfig(fs_fd, FSCONFIG_SET_STRING, "lowerdir", ":/lower2:/lower3:/lower4", 0); /* turn index feature on */ fsconfig(fs_fd, FSCONFIG_SET_STRING, "index", "on", 0); /* append "/lower5" */ fsconfig(fs_fd, FSCONFIG_SET_STRING, "lowerdir", ":/lower5", 0); Specifying ':' would have been rejected so this isn't a regression. And we can't simply use "lowerdir=/lower" to append on top of existing layers as "lowerdir=/lower,lowerdir=/other-lower" would make "/other-lower" the only lower layer so we'd break uapi if we changed this. So the ':' prefix seems a good compromise. Users can choose to specify multiple layers at once or individual layers. A layer is appended if it starts with ":". This requires that the user has already added at least one layer before. If lowerdir is specified again without a leading ":" then all previous layers are dropped and replaced with the new layers. If lowerdir is specified and empty than all layers are simply dropped. An additional change is that overlayfs will now parse and resolve layers right when they are specified in fsconfig() instead of deferring until super block creation. This allows users to receive early errors. It also allows users to actually use up to 500 layers something which was theoretically possible but ended up not working due to the mount option string passed via mount(2) being too large. This also allows a more privileged process to set config options for a lesser privileged process as the creds for fsconfig() and the creds for fsopen() can differ. We could restrict that they match by enforcing that the creds of fsopen() and fsconfig() match but I don't see why that needs to be the case and allows for a good delegation mechanism. Plus, in the future it means we're able to extend overlayfs mount options and allow users to specify layers via file descriptors instead of paths: fsconfig(FSCONFIG_SET_PATH{_EMPTY}, "lowerdir", "lower1", dirfd); /* append */ fsconfig(FSCONFIG_SET_PATH{_EMPTY}, "lowerdir", "lower2", dirfd); /* append */ fsconfig(FSCONFIG_SET_PATH{_EMPTY}, "lowerdir", "lower3", dirfd); /* clear all layers specified until now */ fsconfig(FSCONFIG_SET_STRING, "lowerdir", NULL, 0); This would be especially nice if users create an overlayfs mount on top of idmapped layers or just in general private mounts created via open_tree(OPEN_TREE_CLONE). Those mounts would then never have to appear anywhere in the filesystem. But for now just do the minimal thing. We should probably aim to move more validation into ovl_fs_parse_param() so users get errors before fsconfig(FSCONFIG_CMD_CREATE). But that can be done in additional patches later. This is now also rebased on top of the lazy lowerdata lookup which allows the specificatin of data only layers using the new "::" syntax. The rules are simple. A data only layers cannot be followed by any regular layers and data layers must be preceeded by at least one regular layer. Parsing the lowerdir mount option must change because of this. The original patchset used the old lowerdir parsing function to split a lowerdir mount option string such as: lowerdir=/lower1:/lower2::/lower3::/lower4 simply replacing each non-escaped ":" by "\0". So sequences of non-escaped ":" were counted as layers. For example, the previous lowerdir mount option above would've counted 6 layers instead of 4 and a lowerdir mount option such as: lowerdir="/lower1:/lower2::/lower3::/lower4:::::::::::::::::::::::::::" would be counted as 33 layers. Other than being ugly this didn't matter much because kern_path() would reject the first "\0" layer. However, this overcounting of layers becomes problematic when we base allocations on it where we very much only want to allocate space for 4 layers instead of 33. So the new parsing function rejects non-escaped sequences of colons other than ":" and "::" immediately instead of relying on kern_path(). Link: https://github.com/util-linux/util-linux/issues/2287 Link: https://github.com/util-linux/util-linux/issues/1992 Link: https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/78702 Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-unionfs/20230530-klagen-zudem-32c0908c2108@brauner Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
2023-06-16 13:54:19 +00:00
if (err)
goto out_err;
ovl: modify layer parameter parsing We ran into issues where mount(8) passed multiple lower layers as one big string through fsconfig(). But the fsconfig() FSCONFIG_SET_STRING option is limited to 256 bytes in strndup_user(). While this would be fixable by extending the fsconfig() buffer I'd rather encourage users to append layers via multiple fsconfig() calls as the interface allows nicely for this. This has also been requested as a feature before. With this port to the new mount api the following will be possible: fsconfig(fs_fd, FSCONFIG_SET_STRING, "lowerdir", "/lower1", 0); /* set upper layer */ fsconfig(fs_fd, FSCONFIG_SET_STRING, "upperdir", "/upper", 0); /* append "/lower2", "/lower3", and "/lower4" */ fsconfig(fs_fd, FSCONFIG_SET_STRING, "lowerdir", ":/lower2:/lower3:/lower4", 0); /* turn index feature on */ fsconfig(fs_fd, FSCONFIG_SET_STRING, "index", "on", 0); /* append "/lower5" */ fsconfig(fs_fd, FSCONFIG_SET_STRING, "lowerdir", ":/lower5", 0); Specifying ':' would have been rejected so this isn't a regression. And we can't simply use "lowerdir=/lower" to append on top of existing layers as "lowerdir=/lower,lowerdir=/other-lower" would make "/other-lower" the only lower layer so we'd break uapi if we changed this. So the ':' prefix seems a good compromise. Users can choose to specify multiple layers at once or individual layers. A layer is appended if it starts with ":". This requires that the user has already added at least one layer before. If lowerdir is specified again without a leading ":" then all previous layers are dropped and replaced with the new layers. If lowerdir is specified and empty than all layers are simply dropped. An additional change is that overlayfs will now parse and resolve layers right when they are specified in fsconfig() instead of deferring until super block creation. This allows users to receive early errors. It also allows users to actually use up to 500 layers something which was theoretically possible but ended up not working due to the mount option string passed via mount(2) being too large. This also allows a more privileged process to set config options for a lesser privileged process as the creds for fsconfig() and the creds for fsopen() can differ. We could restrict that they match by enforcing that the creds of fsopen() and fsconfig() match but I don't see why that needs to be the case and allows for a good delegation mechanism. Plus, in the future it means we're able to extend overlayfs mount options and allow users to specify layers via file descriptors instead of paths: fsconfig(FSCONFIG_SET_PATH{_EMPTY}, "lowerdir", "lower1", dirfd); /* append */ fsconfig(FSCONFIG_SET_PATH{_EMPTY}, "lowerdir", "lower2", dirfd); /* append */ fsconfig(FSCONFIG_SET_PATH{_EMPTY}, "lowerdir", "lower3", dirfd); /* clear all layers specified until now */ fsconfig(FSCONFIG_SET_STRING, "lowerdir", NULL, 0); This would be especially nice if users create an overlayfs mount on top of idmapped layers or just in general private mounts created via open_tree(OPEN_TREE_CLONE). Those mounts would then never have to appear anywhere in the filesystem. But for now just do the minimal thing. We should probably aim to move more validation into ovl_fs_parse_param() so users get errors before fsconfig(FSCONFIG_CMD_CREATE). But that can be done in additional patches later. This is now also rebased on top of the lazy lowerdata lookup which allows the specificatin of data only layers using the new "::" syntax. The rules are simple. A data only layers cannot be followed by any regular layers and data layers must be preceeded by at least one regular layer. Parsing the lowerdir mount option must change because of this. The original patchset used the old lowerdir parsing function to split a lowerdir mount option string such as: lowerdir=/lower1:/lower2::/lower3::/lower4 simply replacing each non-escaped ":" by "\0". So sequences of non-escaped ":" were counted as layers. For example, the previous lowerdir mount option above would've counted 6 layers instead of 4 and a lowerdir mount option such as: lowerdir="/lower1:/lower2::/lower3::/lower4:::::::::::::::::::::::::::" would be counted as 33 layers. Other than being ugly this didn't matter much because kern_path() would reject the first "\0" layer. However, this overcounting of layers becomes problematic when we base allocations on it where we very much only want to allocate space for 4 layers instead of 33. So the new parsing function rejects non-escaped sequences of colons other than ":" and "::" immediately instead of relying on kern_path(). Link: https://github.com/util-linux/util-linux/issues/2287 Link: https://github.com/util-linux/util-linux/issues/1992 Link: https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/78702 Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-unionfs/20230530-klagen-zudem-32c0908c2108@brauner Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
2023-06-16 13:54:19 +00:00
if (data_layer)
ctx->nr_data++;
ovl: modify layer parameter parsing We ran into issues where mount(8) passed multiple lower layers as one big string through fsconfig(). But the fsconfig() FSCONFIG_SET_STRING option is limited to 256 bytes in strndup_user(). While this would be fixable by extending the fsconfig() buffer I'd rather encourage users to append layers via multiple fsconfig() calls as the interface allows nicely for this. This has also been requested as a feature before. With this port to the new mount api the following will be possible: fsconfig(fs_fd, FSCONFIG_SET_STRING, "lowerdir", "/lower1", 0); /* set upper layer */ fsconfig(fs_fd, FSCONFIG_SET_STRING, "upperdir", "/upper", 0); /* append "/lower2", "/lower3", and "/lower4" */ fsconfig(fs_fd, FSCONFIG_SET_STRING, "lowerdir", ":/lower2:/lower3:/lower4", 0); /* turn index feature on */ fsconfig(fs_fd, FSCONFIG_SET_STRING, "index", "on", 0); /* append "/lower5" */ fsconfig(fs_fd, FSCONFIG_SET_STRING, "lowerdir", ":/lower5", 0); Specifying ':' would have been rejected so this isn't a regression. And we can't simply use "lowerdir=/lower" to append on top of existing layers as "lowerdir=/lower,lowerdir=/other-lower" would make "/other-lower" the only lower layer so we'd break uapi if we changed this. So the ':' prefix seems a good compromise. Users can choose to specify multiple layers at once or individual layers. A layer is appended if it starts with ":". This requires that the user has already added at least one layer before. If lowerdir is specified again without a leading ":" then all previous layers are dropped and replaced with the new layers. If lowerdir is specified and empty than all layers are simply dropped. An additional change is that overlayfs will now parse and resolve layers right when they are specified in fsconfig() instead of deferring until super block creation. This allows users to receive early errors. It also allows users to actually use up to 500 layers something which was theoretically possible but ended up not working due to the mount option string passed via mount(2) being too large. This also allows a more privileged process to set config options for a lesser privileged process as the creds for fsconfig() and the creds for fsopen() can differ. We could restrict that they match by enforcing that the creds of fsopen() and fsconfig() match but I don't see why that needs to be the case and allows for a good delegation mechanism. Plus, in the future it means we're able to extend overlayfs mount options and allow users to specify layers via file descriptors instead of paths: fsconfig(FSCONFIG_SET_PATH{_EMPTY}, "lowerdir", "lower1", dirfd); /* append */ fsconfig(FSCONFIG_SET_PATH{_EMPTY}, "lowerdir", "lower2", dirfd); /* append */ fsconfig(FSCONFIG_SET_PATH{_EMPTY}, "lowerdir", "lower3", dirfd); /* clear all layers specified until now */ fsconfig(FSCONFIG_SET_STRING, "lowerdir", NULL, 0); This would be especially nice if users create an overlayfs mount on top of idmapped layers or just in general private mounts created via open_tree(OPEN_TREE_CLONE). Those mounts would then never have to appear anywhere in the filesystem. But for now just do the minimal thing. We should probably aim to move more validation into ovl_fs_parse_param() so users get errors before fsconfig(FSCONFIG_CMD_CREATE). But that can be done in additional patches later. This is now also rebased on top of the lazy lowerdata lookup which allows the specificatin of data only layers using the new "::" syntax. The rules are simple. A data only layers cannot be followed by any regular layers and data layers must be preceeded by at least one regular layer. Parsing the lowerdir mount option must change because of this. The original patchset used the old lowerdir parsing function to split a lowerdir mount option string such as: lowerdir=/lower1:/lower2::/lower3::/lower4 simply replacing each non-escaped ":" by "\0". So sequences of non-escaped ":" were counted as layers. For example, the previous lowerdir mount option above would've counted 6 layers instead of 4 and a lowerdir mount option such as: lowerdir="/lower1:/lower2::/lower3::/lower4:::::::::::::::::::::::::::" would be counted as 33 layers. Other than being ugly this didn't matter much because kern_path() would reject the first "\0" layer. However, this overcounting of layers becomes problematic when we base allocations on it where we very much only want to allocate space for 4 layers instead of 33. So the new parsing function rejects non-escaped sequences of colons other than ":" and "::" immediately instead of relying on kern_path(). Link: https://github.com/util-linux/util-linux/issues/2287 Link: https://github.com/util-linux/util-linux/issues/1992 Link: https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/78702 Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-unionfs/20230530-klagen-zudem-32c0908c2108@brauner Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
2023-06-16 13:54:19 +00:00
/* Calling strchr() again would overrun. */
if (ctx->nr == nr_lower)
ovl: modify layer parameter parsing We ran into issues where mount(8) passed multiple lower layers as one big string through fsconfig(). But the fsconfig() FSCONFIG_SET_STRING option is limited to 256 bytes in strndup_user(). While this would be fixable by extending the fsconfig() buffer I'd rather encourage users to append layers via multiple fsconfig() calls as the interface allows nicely for this. This has also been requested as a feature before. With this port to the new mount api the following will be possible: fsconfig(fs_fd, FSCONFIG_SET_STRING, "lowerdir", "/lower1", 0); /* set upper layer */ fsconfig(fs_fd, FSCONFIG_SET_STRING, "upperdir", "/upper", 0); /* append "/lower2", "/lower3", and "/lower4" */ fsconfig(fs_fd, FSCONFIG_SET_STRING, "lowerdir", ":/lower2:/lower3:/lower4", 0); /* turn index feature on */ fsconfig(fs_fd, FSCONFIG_SET_STRING, "index", "on", 0); /* append "/lower5" */ fsconfig(fs_fd, FSCONFIG_SET_STRING, "lowerdir", ":/lower5", 0); Specifying ':' would have been rejected so this isn't a regression. And we can't simply use "lowerdir=/lower" to append on top of existing layers as "lowerdir=/lower,lowerdir=/other-lower" would make "/other-lower" the only lower layer so we'd break uapi if we changed this. So the ':' prefix seems a good compromise. Users can choose to specify multiple layers at once or individual layers. A layer is appended if it starts with ":". This requires that the user has already added at least one layer before. If lowerdir is specified again without a leading ":" then all previous layers are dropped and replaced with the new layers. If lowerdir is specified and empty than all layers are simply dropped. An additional change is that overlayfs will now parse and resolve layers right when they are specified in fsconfig() instead of deferring until super block creation. This allows users to receive early errors. It also allows users to actually use up to 500 layers something which was theoretically possible but ended up not working due to the mount option string passed via mount(2) being too large. This also allows a more privileged process to set config options for a lesser privileged process as the creds for fsconfig() and the creds for fsopen() can differ. We could restrict that they match by enforcing that the creds of fsopen() and fsconfig() match but I don't see why that needs to be the case and allows for a good delegation mechanism. Plus, in the future it means we're able to extend overlayfs mount options and allow users to specify layers via file descriptors instead of paths: fsconfig(FSCONFIG_SET_PATH{_EMPTY}, "lowerdir", "lower1", dirfd); /* append */ fsconfig(FSCONFIG_SET_PATH{_EMPTY}, "lowerdir", "lower2", dirfd); /* append */ fsconfig(FSCONFIG_SET_PATH{_EMPTY}, "lowerdir", "lower3", dirfd); /* clear all layers specified until now */ fsconfig(FSCONFIG_SET_STRING, "lowerdir", NULL, 0); This would be especially nice if users create an overlayfs mount on top of idmapped layers or just in general private mounts created via open_tree(OPEN_TREE_CLONE). Those mounts would then never have to appear anywhere in the filesystem. But for now just do the minimal thing. We should probably aim to move more validation into ovl_fs_parse_param() so users get errors before fsconfig(FSCONFIG_CMD_CREATE). But that can be done in additional patches later. This is now also rebased on top of the lazy lowerdata lookup which allows the specificatin of data only layers using the new "::" syntax. The rules are simple. A data only layers cannot be followed by any regular layers and data layers must be preceeded by at least one regular layer. Parsing the lowerdir mount option must change because of this. The original patchset used the old lowerdir parsing function to split a lowerdir mount option string such as: lowerdir=/lower1:/lower2::/lower3::/lower4 simply replacing each non-escaped ":" by "\0". So sequences of non-escaped ":" were counted as layers. For example, the previous lowerdir mount option above would've counted 6 layers instead of 4 and a lowerdir mount option such as: lowerdir="/lower1:/lower2::/lower3::/lower4:::::::::::::::::::::::::::" would be counted as 33 layers. Other than being ugly this didn't matter much because kern_path() would reject the first "\0" layer. However, this overcounting of layers becomes problematic when we base allocations on it where we very much only want to allocate space for 4 layers instead of 33. So the new parsing function rejects non-escaped sequences of colons other than ":" and "::" immediately instead of relying on kern_path(). Link: https://github.com/util-linux/util-linux/issues/2287 Link: https://github.com/util-linux/util-linux/issues/1992 Link: https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/78702 Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-unionfs/20230530-klagen-zudem-32c0908c2108@brauner Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
2023-06-16 13:54:19 +00:00
break;
err = -EINVAL;
iter = strchr(iter, '\0') + 1;
if (*iter) {
ovl: modify layer parameter parsing We ran into issues where mount(8) passed multiple lower layers as one big string through fsconfig(). But the fsconfig() FSCONFIG_SET_STRING option is limited to 256 bytes in strndup_user(). While this would be fixable by extending the fsconfig() buffer I'd rather encourage users to append layers via multiple fsconfig() calls as the interface allows nicely for this. This has also been requested as a feature before. With this port to the new mount api the following will be possible: fsconfig(fs_fd, FSCONFIG_SET_STRING, "lowerdir", "/lower1", 0); /* set upper layer */ fsconfig(fs_fd, FSCONFIG_SET_STRING, "upperdir", "/upper", 0); /* append "/lower2", "/lower3", and "/lower4" */ fsconfig(fs_fd, FSCONFIG_SET_STRING, "lowerdir", ":/lower2:/lower3:/lower4", 0); /* turn index feature on */ fsconfig(fs_fd, FSCONFIG_SET_STRING, "index", "on", 0); /* append "/lower5" */ fsconfig(fs_fd, FSCONFIG_SET_STRING, "lowerdir", ":/lower5", 0); Specifying ':' would have been rejected so this isn't a regression. And we can't simply use "lowerdir=/lower" to append on top of existing layers as "lowerdir=/lower,lowerdir=/other-lower" would make "/other-lower" the only lower layer so we'd break uapi if we changed this. So the ':' prefix seems a good compromise. Users can choose to specify multiple layers at once or individual layers. A layer is appended if it starts with ":". This requires that the user has already added at least one layer before. If lowerdir is specified again without a leading ":" then all previous layers are dropped and replaced with the new layers. If lowerdir is specified and empty than all layers are simply dropped. An additional change is that overlayfs will now parse and resolve layers right when they are specified in fsconfig() instead of deferring until super block creation. This allows users to receive early errors. It also allows users to actually use up to 500 layers something which was theoretically possible but ended up not working due to the mount option string passed via mount(2) being too large. This also allows a more privileged process to set config options for a lesser privileged process as the creds for fsconfig() and the creds for fsopen() can differ. We could restrict that they match by enforcing that the creds of fsopen() and fsconfig() match but I don't see why that needs to be the case and allows for a good delegation mechanism. Plus, in the future it means we're able to extend overlayfs mount options and allow users to specify layers via file descriptors instead of paths: fsconfig(FSCONFIG_SET_PATH{_EMPTY}, "lowerdir", "lower1", dirfd); /* append */ fsconfig(FSCONFIG_SET_PATH{_EMPTY}, "lowerdir", "lower2", dirfd); /* append */ fsconfig(FSCONFIG_SET_PATH{_EMPTY}, "lowerdir", "lower3", dirfd); /* clear all layers specified until now */ fsconfig(FSCONFIG_SET_STRING, "lowerdir", NULL, 0); This would be especially nice if users create an overlayfs mount on top of idmapped layers or just in general private mounts created via open_tree(OPEN_TREE_CLONE). Those mounts would then never have to appear anywhere in the filesystem. But for now just do the minimal thing. We should probably aim to move more validation into ovl_fs_parse_param() so users get errors before fsconfig(FSCONFIG_CMD_CREATE). But that can be done in additional patches later. This is now also rebased on top of the lazy lowerdata lookup which allows the specificatin of data only layers using the new "::" syntax. The rules are simple. A data only layers cannot be followed by any regular layers and data layers must be preceeded by at least one regular layer. Parsing the lowerdir mount option must change because of this. The original patchset used the old lowerdir parsing function to split a lowerdir mount option string such as: lowerdir=/lower1:/lower2::/lower3::/lower4 simply replacing each non-escaped ":" by "\0". So sequences of non-escaped ":" were counted as layers. For example, the previous lowerdir mount option above would've counted 6 layers instead of 4 and a lowerdir mount option such as: lowerdir="/lower1:/lower2::/lower3::/lower4:::::::::::::::::::::::::::" would be counted as 33 layers. Other than being ugly this didn't matter much because kern_path() would reject the first "\0" layer. However, this overcounting of layers becomes problematic when we base allocations on it where we very much only want to allocate space for 4 layers instead of 33. So the new parsing function rejects non-escaped sequences of colons other than ":" and "::" immediately instead of relying on kern_path(). Link: https://github.com/util-linux/util-linux/issues/2287 Link: https://github.com/util-linux/util-linux/issues/1992 Link: https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/78702 Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-unionfs/20230530-klagen-zudem-32c0908c2108@brauner Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
2023-06-16 13:54:19 +00:00
/*
* This is a regular layer so we require that
* there are no data layers.
*/
if (ctx->nr_data > 0) {
pr_err("regular lower layers cannot follow data lower layers\n");
goto out_err;
ovl: modify layer parameter parsing We ran into issues where mount(8) passed multiple lower layers as one big string through fsconfig(). But the fsconfig() FSCONFIG_SET_STRING option is limited to 256 bytes in strndup_user(). While this would be fixable by extending the fsconfig() buffer I'd rather encourage users to append layers via multiple fsconfig() calls as the interface allows nicely for this. This has also been requested as a feature before. With this port to the new mount api the following will be possible: fsconfig(fs_fd, FSCONFIG_SET_STRING, "lowerdir", "/lower1", 0); /* set upper layer */ fsconfig(fs_fd, FSCONFIG_SET_STRING, "upperdir", "/upper", 0); /* append "/lower2", "/lower3", and "/lower4" */ fsconfig(fs_fd, FSCONFIG_SET_STRING, "lowerdir", ":/lower2:/lower3:/lower4", 0); /* turn index feature on */ fsconfig(fs_fd, FSCONFIG_SET_STRING, "index", "on", 0); /* append "/lower5" */ fsconfig(fs_fd, FSCONFIG_SET_STRING, "lowerdir", ":/lower5", 0); Specifying ':' would have been rejected so this isn't a regression. And we can't simply use "lowerdir=/lower" to append on top of existing layers as "lowerdir=/lower,lowerdir=/other-lower" would make "/other-lower" the only lower layer so we'd break uapi if we changed this. So the ':' prefix seems a good compromise. Users can choose to specify multiple layers at once or individual layers. A layer is appended if it starts with ":". This requires that the user has already added at least one layer before. If lowerdir is specified again without a leading ":" then all previous layers are dropped and replaced with the new layers. If lowerdir is specified and empty than all layers are simply dropped. An additional change is that overlayfs will now parse and resolve layers right when they are specified in fsconfig() instead of deferring until super block creation. This allows users to receive early errors. It also allows users to actually use up to 500 layers something which was theoretically possible but ended up not working due to the mount option string passed via mount(2) being too large. This also allows a more privileged process to set config options for a lesser privileged process as the creds for fsconfig() and the creds for fsopen() can differ. We could restrict that they match by enforcing that the creds of fsopen() and fsconfig() match but I don't see why that needs to be the case and allows for a good delegation mechanism. Plus, in the future it means we're able to extend overlayfs mount options and allow users to specify layers via file descriptors instead of paths: fsconfig(FSCONFIG_SET_PATH{_EMPTY}, "lowerdir", "lower1", dirfd); /* append */ fsconfig(FSCONFIG_SET_PATH{_EMPTY}, "lowerdir", "lower2", dirfd); /* append */ fsconfig(FSCONFIG_SET_PATH{_EMPTY}, "lowerdir", "lower3", dirfd); /* clear all layers specified until now */ fsconfig(FSCONFIG_SET_STRING, "lowerdir", NULL, 0); This would be especially nice if users create an overlayfs mount on top of idmapped layers or just in general private mounts created via open_tree(OPEN_TREE_CLONE). Those mounts would then never have to appear anywhere in the filesystem. But for now just do the minimal thing. We should probably aim to move more validation into ovl_fs_parse_param() so users get errors before fsconfig(FSCONFIG_CMD_CREATE). But that can be done in additional patches later. This is now also rebased on top of the lazy lowerdata lookup which allows the specificatin of data only layers using the new "::" syntax. The rules are simple. A data only layers cannot be followed by any regular layers and data layers must be preceeded by at least one regular layer. Parsing the lowerdir mount option must change because of this. The original patchset used the old lowerdir parsing function to split a lowerdir mount option string such as: lowerdir=/lower1:/lower2::/lower3::/lower4 simply replacing each non-escaped ":" by "\0". So sequences of non-escaped ":" were counted as layers. For example, the previous lowerdir mount option above would've counted 6 layers instead of 4 and a lowerdir mount option such as: lowerdir="/lower1:/lower2::/lower3::/lower4:::::::::::::::::::::::::::" would be counted as 33 layers. Other than being ugly this didn't matter much because kern_path() would reject the first "\0" layer. However, this overcounting of layers becomes problematic when we base allocations on it where we very much only want to allocate space for 4 layers instead of 33. So the new parsing function rejects non-escaped sequences of colons other than ":" and "::" immediately instead of relying on kern_path(). Link: https://github.com/util-linux/util-linux/issues/2287 Link: https://github.com/util-linux/util-linux/issues/1992 Link: https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/78702 Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-unionfs/20230530-klagen-zudem-32c0908c2108@brauner Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
2023-06-16 13:54:19 +00:00
}
data_layer = false;
continue;
}
/* This is a data lower layer. */
data_layer = true;
iter++;
ovl: modify layer parameter parsing We ran into issues where mount(8) passed multiple lower layers as one big string through fsconfig(). But the fsconfig() FSCONFIG_SET_STRING option is limited to 256 bytes in strndup_user(). While this would be fixable by extending the fsconfig() buffer I'd rather encourage users to append layers via multiple fsconfig() calls as the interface allows nicely for this. This has also been requested as a feature before. With this port to the new mount api the following will be possible: fsconfig(fs_fd, FSCONFIG_SET_STRING, "lowerdir", "/lower1", 0); /* set upper layer */ fsconfig(fs_fd, FSCONFIG_SET_STRING, "upperdir", "/upper", 0); /* append "/lower2", "/lower3", and "/lower4" */ fsconfig(fs_fd, FSCONFIG_SET_STRING, "lowerdir", ":/lower2:/lower3:/lower4", 0); /* turn index feature on */ fsconfig(fs_fd, FSCONFIG_SET_STRING, "index", "on", 0); /* append "/lower5" */ fsconfig(fs_fd, FSCONFIG_SET_STRING, "lowerdir", ":/lower5", 0); Specifying ':' would have been rejected so this isn't a regression. And we can't simply use "lowerdir=/lower" to append on top of existing layers as "lowerdir=/lower,lowerdir=/other-lower" would make "/other-lower" the only lower layer so we'd break uapi if we changed this. So the ':' prefix seems a good compromise. Users can choose to specify multiple layers at once or individual layers. A layer is appended if it starts with ":". This requires that the user has already added at least one layer before. If lowerdir is specified again without a leading ":" then all previous layers are dropped and replaced with the new layers. If lowerdir is specified and empty than all layers are simply dropped. An additional change is that overlayfs will now parse and resolve layers right when they are specified in fsconfig() instead of deferring until super block creation. This allows users to receive early errors. It also allows users to actually use up to 500 layers something which was theoretically possible but ended up not working due to the mount option string passed via mount(2) being too large. This also allows a more privileged process to set config options for a lesser privileged process as the creds for fsconfig() and the creds for fsopen() can differ. We could restrict that they match by enforcing that the creds of fsopen() and fsconfig() match but I don't see why that needs to be the case and allows for a good delegation mechanism. Plus, in the future it means we're able to extend overlayfs mount options and allow users to specify layers via file descriptors instead of paths: fsconfig(FSCONFIG_SET_PATH{_EMPTY}, "lowerdir", "lower1", dirfd); /* append */ fsconfig(FSCONFIG_SET_PATH{_EMPTY}, "lowerdir", "lower2", dirfd); /* append */ fsconfig(FSCONFIG_SET_PATH{_EMPTY}, "lowerdir", "lower3", dirfd); /* clear all layers specified until now */ fsconfig(FSCONFIG_SET_STRING, "lowerdir", NULL, 0); This would be especially nice if users create an overlayfs mount on top of idmapped layers or just in general private mounts created via open_tree(OPEN_TREE_CLONE). Those mounts would then never have to appear anywhere in the filesystem. But for now just do the minimal thing. We should probably aim to move more validation into ovl_fs_parse_param() so users get errors before fsconfig(FSCONFIG_CMD_CREATE). But that can be done in additional patches later. This is now also rebased on top of the lazy lowerdata lookup which allows the specificatin of data only layers using the new "::" syntax. The rules are simple. A data only layers cannot be followed by any regular layers and data layers must be preceeded by at least one regular layer. Parsing the lowerdir mount option must change because of this. The original patchset used the old lowerdir parsing function to split a lowerdir mount option string such as: lowerdir=/lower1:/lower2::/lower3::/lower4 simply replacing each non-escaped ":" by "\0". So sequences of non-escaped ":" were counted as layers. For example, the previous lowerdir mount option above would've counted 6 layers instead of 4 and a lowerdir mount option such as: lowerdir="/lower1:/lower2::/lower3::/lower4:::::::::::::::::::::::::::" would be counted as 33 layers. Other than being ugly this didn't matter much because kern_path() would reject the first "\0" layer. However, this overcounting of layers becomes problematic when we base allocations on it where we very much only want to allocate space for 4 layers instead of 33. So the new parsing function rejects non-escaped sequences of colons other than ":" and "::" immediately instead of relying on kern_path(). Link: https://github.com/util-linux/util-linux/issues/2287 Link: https://github.com/util-linux/util-linux/issues/1992 Link: https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/78702 Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-unionfs/20230530-klagen-zudem-32c0908c2108@brauner Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
2023-06-16 13:54:19 +00:00
}
kfree(dup);
return 0;
out_err:
kfree(dup);
/* Intentionally don't realloc to a smaller size. */
return err;
}
static int ovl_parse_param(struct fs_context *fc, struct fs_parameter *param)
{
int err = 0;
struct fs_parse_result result;
struct ovl_fs *ofs = fc->s_fs_info;
struct ovl_config *config = &ofs->config;
struct ovl_fs_context *ctx = fc->fs_private;
int opt;
if (fc->purpose == FS_CONTEXT_FOR_RECONFIGURE) {
/*
* On remount overlayfs has always ignored all mount
* options no matter if malformed or not so for
* backwards compatibility we do the same here.
*/
if (fc->oldapi)
return 0;
/*
* Give us the freedom to allow changing mount options
* with the new mount api in the future. So instead of
* silently ignoring everything we report a proper
* error. This is only visible for users of the new
* mount api.
*/
return invalfc(fc, "No changes allowed in reconfigure");
}
opt = fs_parse(fc, ovl_parameter_spec, param, &result);
if (opt < 0)
return opt;
switch (opt) {
case Opt_lowerdir:
err = ovl_parse_param_lowerdir(param->string, fc);
break;
case Opt_lowerdir_add:
case Opt_datadir_add:
case Opt_upperdir:
case Opt_workdir:
err = ovl_parse_layer(fc, param, opt);
break;
case Opt_default_permissions:
config->default_permissions = true;
break;
case Opt_redirect_dir:
config->redirect_mode = result.uint_32;
if (config->redirect_mode == OVL_REDIRECT_OFF) {
config->redirect_mode = ovl_redirect_always_follow ?
OVL_REDIRECT_FOLLOW :
OVL_REDIRECT_NOFOLLOW;
}
ctx->set.redirect = true;
break;
case Opt_index:
config->index = result.uint_32;
ctx->set.index = true;
break;
case Opt_uuid:
config->uuid = result.uint_32;
break;
case Opt_nfs_export:
config->nfs_export = result.uint_32;
ctx->set.nfs_export = true;
break;
case Opt_xino:
config->xino = result.uint_32;
break;
case Opt_metacopy:
config->metacopy = result.uint_32;
ctx->set.metacopy = true;
break;
case Opt_verity:
config->verity_mode = result.uint_32;
break;
case Opt_volatile:
config->ovl_volatile = true;
break;
case Opt_userxattr:
config->userxattr = true;
break;
default:
pr_err("unrecognized mount option \"%s\" or missing value\n",
param->key);
return -EINVAL;
}
return err;
}
static int ovl_get_tree(struct fs_context *fc)
{
return get_tree_nodev(fc, ovl_fill_super);
}
static inline void ovl_fs_context_free(struct ovl_fs_context *ctx)
{
ovl_reset_lowerdirs(ctx);
path_put(&ctx->upper);
path_put(&ctx->work);
kfree(ctx->lower);
kfree(ctx);
}
static void ovl_free(struct fs_context *fc)
{
struct ovl_fs *ofs = fc->s_fs_info;
struct ovl_fs_context *ctx = fc->fs_private;
/*
* ofs is stored in the fs_context when it is initialized.
* ofs is transferred to the superblock on a successful mount,
* but if an error occurs before the transfer we have to free
* it here.
*/
if (ofs)
ovl_free_fs(ofs);
if (ctx)
ovl_fs_context_free(ctx);
}
static int ovl_reconfigure(struct fs_context *fc)
{
struct super_block *sb = fc->root->d_sb;
struct ovl_fs *ofs = OVL_FS(sb);
struct super_block *upper_sb;
int ret = 0;
if (!(fc->sb_flags & SB_RDONLY) && ovl_force_readonly(ofs))
return -EROFS;
if (fc->sb_flags & SB_RDONLY && !sb_rdonly(sb)) {
upper_sb = ovl_upper_mnt(ofs)->mnt_sb;
if (ovl_should_sync(ofs)) {
down_read(&upper_sb->s_umount);
ret = sync_filesystem(upper_sb);
up_read(&upper_sb->s_umount);
}
}
return ret;
}
static const struct fs_context_operations ovl_context_ops = {
.parse_monolithic = ovl_parse_monolithic,
.parse_param = ovl_parse_param,
.get_tree = ovl_get_tree,
.reconfigure = ovl_reconfigure,
.free = ovl_free,
};
/*
* This is called during fsopen() and will record the user namespace of
* the caller in fc->user_ns since we've raised FS_USERNS_MOUNT. We'll
* need it when we actually create the superblock to verify that the
* process creating the superblock is in the same user namespace as
* process that called fsopen().
*/
int ovl_init_fs_context(struct fs_context *fc)
{
struct ovl_fs_context *ctx;
struct ovl_fs *ofs;
ctx = kzalloc(sizeof(*ctx), GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT);
if (!ctx)
return -ENOMEM;
/*
* By default we allocate for three lower layers. It's likely
* that it'll cover most users.
*/
ctx->lower = kmalloc_array(3, sizeof(*ctx->lower), GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT);
if (!ctx->lower)
goto out_err;
ctx->capacity = 3;
ofs = kzalloc(sizeof(struct ovl_fs), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!ofs)
goto out_err;
ofs->config.redirect_mode = ovl_redirect_mode_def();
ofs->config.index = ovl_index_def;
ofs->config.uuid = ovl_uuid_def();
ofs->config.nfs_export = ovl_nfs_export_def;
ofs->config.xino = ovl_xino_def();
ofs->config.metacopy = ovl_metacopy_def;
fc->s_fs_info = ofs;
fc->fs_private = ctx;
fc->ops = &ovl_context_ops;
return 0;
out_err:
ovl_fs_context_free(ctx);
return -ENOMEM;
}
void ovl_free_fs(struct ovl_fs *ofs)
{
struct vfsmount **mounts;
unsigned i;
iput(ofs->workbasedir_trap);
iput(ofs->workdir_trap);
dput(ofs->whiteout);
dput(ofs->workdir);
if (ofs->workdir_locked)
ovl_inuse_unlock(ofs->workbasedir);
dput(ofs->workbasedir);
if (ofs->upperdir_locked)
ovl_inuse_unlock(ovl_upper_mnt(ofs)->mnt_root);
/* Reuse ofs->config.lowerdirs as a vfsmount array before freeing it */
mounts = (struct vfsmount **) ofs->config.lowerdirs;
for (i = 0; i < ofs->numlayer; i++) {
iput(ofs->layers[i].trap);
kfree(ofs->config.lowerdirs[i]);
mounts[i] = ofs->layers[i].mnt;
}
kern_unmount_array(mounts, ofs->numlayer);
kfree(ofs->layers);
for (i = 0; i < ofs->numfs; i++)
free_anon_bdev(ofs->fs[i].pseudo_dev);
kfree(ofs->fs);
kfree(ofs->config.lowerdirs);
kfree(ofs->config.upperdir);
kfree(ofs->config.workdir);
if (ofs->creator_cred)
put_cred(ofs->creator_cred);
kfree(ofs);
}
int ovl_fs_params_verify(const struct ovl_fs_context *ctx,
struct ovl_config *config)
{
struct ovl_opt_set set = ctx->set;
/* Workdir/index are useless in non-upper mount */
if (!config->upperdir) {
if (config->workdir) {
pr_info("option \"workdir=%s\" is useless in a non-upper mount, ignore\n",
config->workdir);
kfree(config->workdir);
config->workdir = NULL;
}
if (config->index && set.index) {
pr_info("option \"index=on\" is useless in a non-upper mount, ignore\n");
set.index = false;
}
config->index = false;
}
if (!config->upperdir && config->ovl_volatile) {
pr_info("option \"volatile\" is meaningless in a non-upper mount, ignoring it.\n");
config->ovl_volatile = false;
}
if (!config->upperdir && config->uuid == OVL_UUID_ON) {
pr_info("option \"uuid=on\" requires an upper fs, falling back to uuid=null.\n");
config->uuid = OVL_UUID_NULL;
}
/* Resolve verity -> metacopy dependency */
if (config->verity_mode && !config->metacopy) {
/* Don't allow explicit specified conflicting combinations */
if (set.metacopy) {
pr_err("conflicting options: metacopy=off,verity=%s\n",
ovl_verity_mode(config));
return -EINVAL;
}
/* Otherwise automatically enable metacopy. */
config->metacopy = true;
}
/*
* This is to make the logic below simpler. It doesn't make any other
* difference, since redirect_dir=on is only used for upper.
*/
if (!config->upperdir && config->redirect_mode == OVL_REDIRECT_FOLLOW)
config->redirect_mode = OVL_REDIRECT_ON;
/* Resolve verity -> metacopy -> redirect_dir dependency */
if (config->metacopy && config->redirect_mode != OVL_REDIRECT_ON) {
if (set.metacopy && set.redirect) {
pr_err("conflicting options: metacopy=on,redirect_dir=%s\n",
ovl_redirect_mode(config));
return -EINVAL;
}
if (config->verity_mode && set.redirect) {
pr_err("conflicting options: verity=%s,redirect_dir=%s\n",
ovl_verity_mode(config), ovl_redirect_mode(config));
return -EINVAL;
}
if (set.redirect) {
/*
* There was an explicit redirect_dir=... that resulted
* in this conflict.
*/
pr_info("disabling metacopy due to redirect_dir=%s\n",
ovl_redirect_mode(config));
config->metacopy = false;
} else {
/* Automatically enable redirect otherwise. */
config->redirect_mode = OVL_REDIRECT_ON;
}
}
/* Resolve nfs_export -> index dependency */
if (config->nfs_export && !config->index) {
if (!config->upperdir &&
config->redirect_mode != OVL_REDIRECT_NOFOLLOW) {
pr_info("NFS export requires \"redirect_dir=nofollow\" on non-upper mount, falling back to nfs_export=off.\n");
config->nfs_export = false;
} else if (set.nfs_export && set.index) {
pr_err("conflicting options: nfs_export=on,index=off\n");
return -EINVAL;
} else if (set.index) {
/*
* There was an explicit index=off that resulted
* in this conflict.
*/
pr_info("disabling nfs_export due to index=off\n");
config->nfs_export = false;
} else {
/* Automatically enable index otherwise. */
config->index = true;
}
}
/* Resolve nfs_export -> !metacopy && !verity dependency */
if (config->nfs_export && config->metacopy) {
if (set.nfs_export && set.metacopy) {
pr_err("conflicting options: nfs_export=on,metacopy=on\n");
return -EINVAL;
}
if (set.metacopy) {
/*
* There was an explicit metacopy=on that resulted
* in this conflict.
*/
pr_info("disabling nfs_export due to metacopy=on\n");
config->nfs_export = false;
} else if (config->verity_mode) {
/*
* There was an explicit verity=.. that resulted
* in this conflict.
*/
pr_info("disabling nfs_export due to verity=%s\n",
ovl_verity_mode(config));
config->nfs_export = false;
} else {
/*
* There was an explicit nfs_export=on that resulted
* in this conflict.
*/
pr_info("disabling metacopy due to nfs_export=on\n");
config->metacopy = false;
}
}
/* Resolve userxattr -> !redirect && !metacopy && !verity dependency */
if (config->userxattr) {
if (set.redirect &&
config->redirect_mode != OVL_REDIRECT_NOFOLLOW) {
pr_err("conflicting options: userxattr,redirect_dir=%s\n",
ovl_redirect_mode(config));
return -EINVAL;
}
if (config->metacopy && set.metacopy) {
pr_err("conflicting options: userxattr,metacopy=on\n");
return -EINVAL;
}
if (config->verity_mode) {
pr_err("conflicting options: userxattr,verity=%s\n",
ovl_verity_mode(config));
return -EINVAL;
}
/*
* Silently disable default setting of redirect and metacopy.
* This shall be the default in the future as well: these
* options must be explicitly enabled if used together with
* userxattr.
*/
config->redirect_mode = OVL_REDIRECT_NOFOLLOW;
config->metacopy = false;
}
/*
* Fail if we don't have trusted xattr capability and a feature was
* explicitly requested that requires them.
*/
if (!config->userxattr && !capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN)) {
if (set.redirect &&
config->redirect_mode != OVL_REDIRECT_NOFOLLOW) {
pr_err("redirect_dir requires permission to access trusted xattrs\n");
return -EPERM;
}
if (config->metacopy && set.metacopy) {
pr_err("metacopy requires permission to access trusted xattrs\n");
return -EPERM;
}
if (config->verity_mode) {
pr_err("verity requires permission to access trusted xattrs\n");
return -EPERM;
}
if (ctx->nr_data > 0) {
pr_err("lower data-only dirs require permission to access trusted xattrs\n");
return -EPERM;
}
/*
* Other xattr-dependent features should be disabled without
* great disturbance to the user in ovl_make_workdir().
*/
}
if (ctx->nr_data > 0 && !config->metacopy) {
pr_err("lower data-only dirs require metacopy support.\n");
return -EINVAL;
}
return 0;
}
/**
* ovl_show_options
* @m: the seq_file handle
* @dentry: The dentry to query
*
* Prints the mount options for a given superblock.
* Returns zero; does not fail.
*/
int ovl_show_options(struct seq_file *m, struct dentry *dentry)
{
struct super_block *sb = dentry->d_sb;
struct ovl_fs *ofs = OVL_FS(sb);
size_t nr, nr_merged_lower, nr_lower = 0;
char **lowerdirs = ofs->config.lowerdirs;
/*
* lowerdirs[0] holds the colon separated list that user provided
* with lowerdir mount option.
* lowerdirs[1..numlayer] hold the lowerdir paths that were added
* using the lowerdir+ and datadir+ mount options.
* For now, we do not allow mixing the legacy lowerdir mount option
* with the new lowerdir+ and datadir+ mount options.
*/
if (lowerdirs[0]) {
seq_show_option(m, "lowerdir", lowerdirs[0]);
} else {
nr_lower = ofs->numlayer;
nr_merged_lower = nr_lower - ofs->numdatalayer;
}
for (nr = 1; nr < nr_lower; nr++) {
if (nr < nr_merged_lower)
seq_show_option(m, "lowerdir+", lowerdirs[nr]);
else
seq_show_option(m, "datadir+", lowerdirs[nr]);
}
if (ofs->config.upperdir) {
seq_show_option(m, "upperdir", ofs->config.upperdir);
seq_show_option(m, "workdir", ofs->config.workdir);
}
if (ofs->config.default_permissions)
seq_puts(m, ",default_permissions");
if (ofs->config.redirect_mode != ovl_redirect_mode_def())
seq_printf(m, ",redirect_dir=%s",
ovl_redirect_mode(&ofs->config));
if (ofs->config.index != ovl_index_def)
seq_printf(m, ",index=%s", ofs->config.index ? "on" : "off");
if (ofs->config.uuid != ovl_uuid_def())
seq_printf(m, ",uuid=%s", ovl_uuid_mode(&ofs->config));
if (ofs->config.nfs_export != ovl_nfs_export_def)
seq_printf(m, ",nfs_export=%s", ofs->config.nfs_export ?
"on" : "off");
if (ofs->config.xino != ovl_xino_def() && !ovl_same_fs(ofs))
seq_printf(m, ",xino=%s", ovl_xino_mode(&ofs->config));
if (ofs->config.metacopy != ovl_metacopy_def)
seq_printf(m, ",metacopy=%s",
ofs->config.metacopy ? "on" : "off");
if (ofs->config.ovl_volatile)
seq_puts(m, ",volatile");
if (ofs->config.userxattr)
seq_puts(m, ",userxattr");
if (ofs->config.verity_mode != ovl_verity_mode_def())
seq_printf(m, ",verity=%s",
ovl_verity_mode(&ofs->config));
return 0;
}