linux-stable/mm/list_lru.c

612 lines
14 KiB
C
Raw Permalink Normal View History

// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
list: add a new LRU list type Several subsystems use the same construct for LRU lists - a list head, a spin lock and and item count. They also use exactly the same code for adding and removing items from the LRU. Create a generic type for these LRU lists. This is the beginning of generic, node aware LRUs for shrinkers to work with. [glommer@openvz.org: enum defined constants for lru. Suggested by gthelen, don't relock over retry] Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <glommer@openvz.org> Reviewed-by: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com> Acked-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com> Cc: Arve Hjønnevåg <arve@android.com> Cc: Carlos Maiolino <cmaiolino@redhat.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com> Cc: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com> Cc: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Cc: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com> Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org> Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> Cc: Kent Overstreet <koverstreet@google.com> Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Cc: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com> Cc: Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@vmware.com> Cc: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2013-08-28 00:17:58 +00:00
/*
* Copyright (c) 2013 Red Hat, Inc. and Parallels Inc. All rights reserved.
* Authors: David Chinner and Glauber Costa
*
* Generic LRU infrastructure
*/
#include <linux/kernel.h>
#include <linux/module.h>
list_lru: per-node list infrastructure Now that we have an LRU list API, we can start to enhance the implementation. This splits the single LRU list into per-node lists and locks to enhance scalability. Items are placed on lists according to the node the memory belongs to. To make scanning the lists efficient, also track whether the per-node lists have entries in them in a active nodemask. Note: We use a fixed-size array for the node LRU, this struct can be very big if MAX_NUMNODES is big. If this becomes a problem this is fixable by turning this into a pointer and dynamically allocating this to nr_node_ids. This quantity is firwmare-provided, and still would provide room for all nodes at the cost of a pointer lookup and an extra allocation. Because that allocation will most likely come from a may very well fail. [glommer@openvz.org: fix warnings, added note about node lru] Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <glommer@openvz.org> Reviewed-by: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com> Acked-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com> Cc: Arve Hjønnevåg <arve@android.com> Cc: Carlos Maiolino <cmaiolino@redhat.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com> Cc: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com> Cc: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Cc: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com> Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org> Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> Cc: Kent Overstreet <koverstreet@google.com> Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Cc: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com> Cc: Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@vmware.com> Cc: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2013-08-28 00:18:00 +00:00
#include <linux/mm.h>
list: add a new LRU list type Several subsystems use the same construct for LRU lists - a list head, a spin lock and and item count. They also use exactly the same code for adding and removing items from the LRU. Create a generic type for these LRU lists. This is the beginning of generic, node aware LRUs for shrinkers to work with. [glommer@openvz.org: enum defined constants for lru. Suggested by gthelen, don't relock over retry] Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <glommer@openvz.org> Reviewed-by: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com> Acked-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com> Cc: Arve Hjønnevåg <arve@android.com> Cc: Carlos Maiolino <cmaiolino@redhat.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com> Cc: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com> Cc: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Cc: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com> Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org> Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> Cc: Kent Overstreet <koverstreet@google.com> Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Cc: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com> Cc: Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@vmware.com> Cc: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2013-08-28 00:17:58 +00:00
#include <linux/list_lru.h>
list_lru: dynamically adjust node arrays We currently use a compile-time constant to size the node array for the list_lru structure. Due to this, we don't need to allocate any memory at initialization time. But as a consequence, the structures that contain embedded list_lru lists can become way too big (the superblock for instance contains two of them). This patch aims at ameliorating this situation by dynamically allocating the node arrays with the firmware provided nr_node_ids. Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <glommer@openvz.org> Cc: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com> Cc: Arve Hjønnevåg <arve@android.com> Cc: Carlos Maiolino <cmaiolino@redhat.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com> Cc: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com> Cc: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Cc: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com> Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org> Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> Cc: Kent Overstreet <koverstreet@google.com> Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Cc: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com> Cc: Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@vmware.com> Cc: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2013-08-28 00:18:18 +00:00
#include <linux/slab.h>
#include <linux/mutex.h>
list_lru: introduce per-memcg lists There are several FS shrinkers, including super_block::s_shrink, that keep reclaimable objects in the list_lru structure. Hence to turn them to memcg-aware shrinkers, it is enough to make list_lru per-memcg. This patch does the trick. It adds an array of lru lists to the list_lru_node structure (per-node part of the list_lru), one for each kmem-active memcg, and dispatches every item addition or removal to the list corresponding to the memcg which the item is accounted to. So now the list_lru structure is not just per node, but per node and per memcg. Not all list_lrus need this feature, so this patch also adds a new method, list_lru_init_memcg, which initializes a list_lru as memcg aware. Otherwise (i.e. if initialized with old list_lru_init), the list_lru won't have per memcg lists. Just like per memcg caches arrays, the arrays of per-memcg lists are indexed by memcg_cache_id, so we must grow them whenever memcg_nr_cache_ids is increased. So we introduce a callback, memcg_update_all_list_lrus, invoked by memcg_alloc_cache_id if the id space is full. The locking is implemented in a manner similar to lruvecs, i.e. we have one lock per node that protects all lists (both global and per cgroup) on the node. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@parallels.com> Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz> Cc: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com> Cc: Glauber Costa <glommer@gmail.com> Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com> Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2015-02-12 22:59:10 +00:00
#include <linux/memcontrol.h>
mm: memcg/slab: stop setting page->mem_cgroup pointer for slab pages Every slab page charged to a non-root memory cgroup has a pointer to the memory cgroup and holds a reference to it, which protects a non-empty memory cgroup from being released. At the same time the page has a pointer to the corresponding kmem_cache, and also hold a reference to the kmem_cache. And kmem_cache by itself holds a reference to the cgroup. So there is clearly some redundancy, which allows to stop setting the page->mem_cgroup pointer and rely on getting memcg pointer indirectly via kmem_cache. Further it will allow to change this pointer easier, without a need to go over all charged pages. So let's stop setting page->mem_cgroup pointer for slab pages, and stop using the css refcounter directly for protecting the memory cgroup from going away. Instead rely on kmem_cache as an intermediate object. Make sure that vmstats and shrinker lists are working as previously, as well as /proc/kpagecgroup interface. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190611231813.3148843-10-guro@fb.com Signed-off-by: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com> Acked-by: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com> Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org> Cc: Andrei Vagin <avagin@gmail.com> Cc: Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2019-07-12 03:56:31 +00:00
#include "slab.h"
mm: introduce kmem_cache_alloc_lru We currently allocate scope for every memcg to be able to tracked on every superblock instantiated in the system, regardless of whether that superblock is even accessible to that memcg. These huge memcg counts come from container hosts where memcgs are confined to just a small subset of the total number of superblocks that instantiated at any given point in time. For these systems with huge container counts, list_lru does not need the capability of tracking every memcg on every superblock. What it comes down to is that adding the memcg to the list_lru at the first insert. So introduce kmem_cache_alloc_lru to allocate objects and its list_lru. In the later patch, we will convert all inode and dentry allocation from kmem_cache_alloc to kmem_cache_alloc_lru. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220228122126.37293-3-songmuchun@bytedance.com Signed-off-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com> Cc: Alex Shi <alexs@kernel.org> Cc: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com> Cc: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org> Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> Cc: Fam Zheng <fam.zheng@bytedance.com> Cc: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Kari Argillander <kari.argillander@gmail.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> Cc: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com> Cc: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com> Cc: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com> Cc: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com> Cc: Xiongchun Duan <duanxiongchun@bytedance.com> Cc: Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2022-03-22 21:40:56 +00:00
#include "internal.h"
#ifdef CONFIG_MEMCG
static LIST_HEAD(memcg_list_lrus);
static DEFINE_MUTEX(list_lrus_mutex);
static inline bool list_lru_memcg_aware(struct list_lru *lru)
{
return lru->memcg_aware;
}
static void list_lru_register(struct list_lru *lru)
{
if (!list_lru_memcg_aware(lru))
return;
mutex_lock(&list_lrus_mutex);
list_add(&lru->list, &memcg_list_lrus);
mutex_unlock(&list_lrus_mutex);
}
static void list_lru_unregister(struct list_lru *lru)
{
if (!list_lru_memcg_aware(lru))
return;
mutex_lock(&list_lrus_mutex);
list_del(&lru->list);
mutex_unlock(&list_lrus_mutex);
}
mm/list_lru.c: set bit in memcg shrinker bitmap on first list_lru item appearance Introduce set_shrinker_bit() function to set shrinker-related bit in memcg shrinker bitmap, and set the bit after the first item is added and in case of reparenting destroyed memcg's items. This will allow next patch to make shrinkers be called only, in case of they have charged objects at the moment, and to improve shrink_slab() performance. [ktkhai@virtuozzo.com: v9] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/153112557572.4097.17315791419810749985.stgit@localhost.localdomain Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/153063065671.1818.15914674956134687268.stgit@localhost.localdomain Signed-off-by: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@virtuozzo.com> Acked-by: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com> Tested-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com> Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@virtuozzo.com> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Cc: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com> Cc: Li RongQing <lirongqing@baidu.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org> Cc: Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@nexb.com> Cc: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com> Cc: Sahitya Tummala <stummala@codeaurora.org> Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Cc: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2018-08-17 22:48:10 +00:00
static int lru_shrinker_id(struct list_lru *lru)
{
return lru->shrinker_id;
}
list_lru: introduce per-memcg lists There are several FS shrinkers, including super_block::s_shrink, that keep reclaimable objects in the list_lru structure. Hence to turn them to memcg-aware shrinkers, it is enough to make list_lru per-memcg. This patch does the trick. It adds an array of lru lists to the list_lru_node structure (per-node part of the list_lru), one for each kmem-active memcg, and dispatches every item addition or removal to the list corresponding to the memcg which the item is accounted to. So now the list_lru structure is not just per node, but per node and per memcg. Not all list_lrus need this feature, so this patch also adds a new method, list_lru_init_memcg, which initializes a list_lru as memcg aware. Otherwise (i.e. if initialized with old list_lru_init), the list_lru won't have per memcg lists. Just like per memcg caches arrays, the arrays of per-memcg lists are indexed by memcg_cache_id, so we must grow them whenever memcg_nr_cache_ids is increased. So we introduce a callback, memcg_update_all_list_lrus, invoked by memcg_alloc_cache_id if the id space is full. The locking is implemented in a manner similar to lruvecs, i.e. we have one lock per node that protects all lists (both global and per cgroup) on the node. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@parallels.com> Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz> Cc: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com> Cc: Glauber Costa <glommer@gmail.com> Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com> Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2015-02-12 22:59:10 +00:00
static inline struct list_lru_one *
mm: list_lru: transpose the array of per-node per-memcg lru lists Patch series "Optimize list lru memory consumption", v6. In our server, we found a suspected memory leak problem. The kmalloc-32 consumes more than 6GB of memory. Other kmem_caches consume less than 2GB memory. After our in-depth analysis, the memory consumption of kmalloc-32 slab cache is the cause of list_lru_one allocation. crash> p memcg_nr_cache_ids memcg_nr_cache_ids = $2 = 24574 memcg_nr_cache_ids is very large and memory consumption of each list_lru can be calculated with the following formula. num_numa_node * memcg_nr_cache_ids * 32 (kmalloc-32) There are 4 numa nodes in our system, so each list_lru consumes ~3MB. crash> list super_blocks | wc -l 952 Every mount will register 2 list lrus, one is for inode, another is for dentry. There are 952 super_blocks. So the total memory is 952 * 2 * 3 MB (~5.6GB). But now the number of memory cgroups is less than 500. So I guess more than 12286 memory cgroups have been created on this machine (I do not know why there are so many cgroups, it may be a user's bug or the user really want to do that). Because memcg_nr_cache_ids has not been reduced to a suitable value. It leads to waste a lot of memory. If we want to reduce memcg_nr_cache_ids, we have to *reboot* the server. This is not what we want. In order to reduce memcg_nr_cache_ids, I had posted a patchset [1] to do this. But this did not fundamentally solve the problem. We currently allocate scope for every memcg to be able to tracked on every superblock instantiated in the system, regardless of whether that superblock is even accessible to that memcg. These huge memcg counts come from container hosts where memcgs are confined to just a small subset of the total number of superblocks that instantiated at any given point in time. For these systems with huge container counts, list_lru does not need the capability of tracking every memcg on every superblock. What it comes down to is that the list_lru is only needed for a given memcg if that memcg is instatiating and freeing objects on a given list_lru. As Dave said, "Which makes me think we should be moving more towards 'add the memcg to the list_lru at the first insert' model rather than 'instantiate all at memcg init time just in case'." This patchset aims to optimize the list lru memory consumption from different aspects. I had done a easy test to show the optimization. I create 10k memory cgroups and mount 10k filesystems in the systems. We use free command to show how many memory does the systems comsumes after this operation (There are 2 numa nodes in the system). +-----------------------+------------------------+ | condition | memory consumption | +-----------------------+------------------------+ | without this patchset | 24464 MB | +-----------------------+------------------------+ | after patch 1 | 21957 MB | <--------+ +-----------------------+------------------------+ | | after patch 10 | 6895 MB | | +-----------------------+------------------------+ | | after patch 12 | 4367 MB | | +-----------------------+------------------------+ | | The more the number of nodes, the more obvious the effect---+ BTW, there was a recent discussion [2] on the same issue. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20210428094949.43579-1-songmuchun@bytedance.com/ [2] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20210405054848.GA1077931@in.ibm.com/ This series not only optimizes the memory usage of list_lru but also simplifies the code. This patch (of 16): The current scheme of maintaining per-node per-memcg lru lists looks like: struct list_lru { struct list_lru_node *node; (for each node) struct list_lru_memcg *memcg_lrus; struct list_lru_one *lru[]; (for each memcg) } By effectively transposing the two-dimension array of list_lru_one's structures (per-node per-memcg => per-memcg per-node) it's possible to save some memory and simplify alloc/dealloc paths. The new scheme looks like: struct list_lru { struct list_lru_memcg *mlrus; struct list_lru_per_memcg *mlru[]; (for each memcg) struct list_lru_one node[0]; (for each node) } Memory savings are coming from not only 'struct rcu_head' but also some pointer arrays used to store the pointer to 'struct list_lru_one'. The array is per node and its size is 8 (a pointer) * num_memcgs. So the total size of the arrays is 8 * num_nodes * memcg_nr_cache_ids. After this patch, the size becomes 8 * memcg_nr_cache_ids. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220228122126.37293-1-songmuchun@bytedance.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220228122126.37293-2-songmuchun@bytedance.com Signed-off-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com> Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> Cc: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com> Cc: Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com> Cc: Alex Shi <alexs@kernel.org> Cc: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com> Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> Cc: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com> Cc: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com> Cc: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org> Cc: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org> Cc: Kari Argillander <kari.argillander@gmail.com> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com> Cc: Xiongchun Duan <duanxiongchun@bytedance.com> Cc: Fam Zheng <fam.zheng@bytedance.com> Cc: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev> Cc: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2022-03-22 21:40:53 +00:00
list_lru_from_memcg_idx(struct list_lru *lru, int nid, int idx)
list_lru: introduce per-memcg lists There are several FS shrinkers, including super_block::s_shrink, that keep reclaimable objects in the list_lru structure. Hence to turn them to memcg-aware shrinkers, it is enough to make list_lru per-memcg. This patch does the trick. It adds an array of lru lists to the list_lru_node structure (per-node part of the list_lru), one for each kmem-active memcg, and dispatches every item addition or removal to the list corresponding to the memcg which the item is accounted to. So now the list_lru structure is not just per node, but per node and per memcg. Not all list_lrus need this feature, so this patch also adds a new method, list_lru_init_memcg, which initializes a list_lru as memcg aware. Otherwise (i.e. if initialized with old list_lru_init), the list_lru won't have per memcg lists. Just like per memcg caches arrays, the arrays of per-memcg lists are indexed by memcg_cache_id, so we must grow them whenever memcg_nr_cache_ids is increased. So we introduce a callback, memcg_update_all_list_lrus, invoked by memcg_alloc_cache_id if the id space is full. The locking is implemented in a manner similar to lruvecs, i.e. we have one lock per node that protects all lists (both global and per cgroup) on the node. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@parallels.com> Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz> Cc: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com> Cc: Glauber Costa <glommer@gmail.com> Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com> Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2015-02-12 22:59:10 +00:00
{
mm: list_lru: replace linear array with xarray If we run 10k containers in the system, the size of the list_lru_memcg->lrus can be ~96KB per list_lru. When we decrease the number containers, the size of the array will not be shrinked. It is not scalable. The xarray is a good choice for this case. We can save a lot of memory when there are tens of thousands continers in the system. If we use xarray, we also can remove the logic code of resizing array, which can simplify the code. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: remove unused local] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220228122126.37293-13-songmuchun@bytedance.com Signed-off-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com> Cc: Alex Shi <alexs@kernel.org> Cc: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com> Cc: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org> Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> Cc: Fam Zheng <fam.zheng@bytedance.com> Cc: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Kari Argillander <kari.argillander@gmail.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> Cc: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com> Cc: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com> Cc: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com> Cc: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com> Cc: Xiongchun Duan <duanxiongchun@bytedance.com> Cc: Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2022-03-22 21:41:25 +00:00
if (list_lru_memcg_aware(lru) && idx >= 0) {
struct list_lru_memcg *mlru = xa_load(&lru->xa, idx);
mm: list_lru: allocate list_lru_one only when needed In our server, we found a suspected memory leak problem. The kmalloc-32 consumes more than 6GB of memory. Other kmem_caches consume less than 2GB memory. After our in-depth analysis, the memory consumption of kmalloc-32 slab cache is the cause of list_lru_one allocation. crash> p memcg_nr_cache_ids memcg_nr_cache_ids = $2 = 24574 memcg_nr_cache_ids is very large and memory consumption of each list_lru can be calculated with the following formula. num_numa_node * memcg_nr_cache_ids * 32 (kmalloc-32) There are 4 numa nodes in our system, so each list_lru consumes ~3MB. crash> list super_blocks | wc -l 952 Every mount will register 2 list lrus, one is for inode, another is for dentry. There are 952 super_blocks. So the total memory is 952 * 2 * 3 MB (~5.6GB). But the number of memory cgroup is less than 500. So I guess more than 12286 containers have been deployed on this machine (I do not know why there are so many containers, it may be a user's bug or the user really want to do that). And memcg_nr_cache_ids has not been reduced to a suitable value. This can waste a lot of memory. Now the infrastructure for dynamic list_lru_one allocation is ready, so remove statically allocated memory code to save memory. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220228122126.37293-11-songmuchun@bytedance.com Signed-off-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com> Cc: Alex Shi <alexs@kernel.org> Cc: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com> Cc: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org> Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> Cc: Fam Zheng <fam.zheng@bytedance.com> Cc: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Kari Argillander <kari.argillander@gmail.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> Cc: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com> Cc: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com> Cc: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com> Cc: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com> Cc: Xiongchun Duan <duanxiongchun@bytedance.com> Cc: Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2022-03-22 21:41:19 +00:00
return mlru ? &mlru->node[nid] : NULL;
}
mm: list_lru: replace linear array with xarray If we run 10k containers in the system, the size of the list_lru_memcg->lrus can be ~96KB per list_lru. When we decrease the number containers, the size of the array will not be shrinked. It is not scalable. The xarray is a good choice for this case. We can save a lot of memory when there are tens of thousands continers in the system. If we use xarray, we also can remove the logic code of resizing array, which can simplify the code. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: remove unused local] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220228122126.37293-13-songmuchun@bytedance.com Signed-off-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com> Cc: Alex Shi <alexs@kernel.org> Cc: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com> Cc: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org> Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> Cc: Fam Zheng <fam.zheng@bytedance.com> Cc: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Kari Argillander <kari.argillander@gmail.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> Cc: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com> Cc: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com> Cc: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com> Cc: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com> Cc: Xiongchun Duan <duanxiongchun@bytedance.com> Cc: Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2022-03-22 21:41:25 +00:00
return &lru->node[nid].lru;
list_lru: introduce per-memcg lists There are several FS shrinkers, including super_block::s_shrink, that keep reclaimable objects in the list_lru structure. Hence to turn them to memcg-aware shrinkers, it is enough to make list_lru per-memcg. This patch does the trick. It adds an array of lru lists to the list_lru_node structure (per-node part of the list_lru), one for each kmem-active memcg, and dispatches every item addition or removal to the list corresponding to the memcg which the item is accounted to. So now the list_lru structure is not just per node, but per node and per memcg. Not all list_lrus need this feature, so this patch also adds a new method, list_lru_init_memcg, which initializes a list_lru as memcg aware. Otherwise (i.e. if initialized with old list_lru_init), the list_lru won't have per memcg lists. Just like per memcg caches arrays, the arrays of per-memcg lists are indexed by memcg_cache_id, so we must grow them whenever memcg_nr_cache_ids is increased. So we introduce a callback, memcg_update_all_list_lrus, invoked by memcg_alloc_cache_id if the id space is full. The locking is implemented in a manner similar to lruvecs, i.e. we have one lock per node that protects all lists (both global and per cgroup) on the node. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@parallels.com> Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz> Cc: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com> Cc: Glauber Costa <glommer@gmail.com> Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com> Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2015-02-12 22:59:10 +00:00
}
mm/list_lru: simplify reparenting and initial allocation Currently, there is a lot of code for detecting reparent racing using kmemcg_id as the synchronization flag. And an intermediate table is required to record and compare the kmemcg_id. We can simplify this by just checking the cgroup css status, skip if cgroup is being offlined. On the reparenting side, ensure no more allocation is on going and no further allocation will occur by using the XArray lock as barrier. Combined with a O(n^2) top-down walk for the allocation, we get rid of the intermediate table allocation completely. Despite being O(n^2), it should be actually faster because it's not practical to have a very deep cgroup level, and in most cases the parent cgroup should have been allocated already. This also avoided changing kmemcg_id before reparenting, making cgroups have a stable index for list_lru_memcg. After this change it's possible that a dying cgroup will see a NULL value in XArray corresponding to the kmemcg_id, because the kmemcg_id will point to an empty slot. In such case, just fallback to use its parent. As a result the code is simpler, following test also showed a very slight performance gain (12 test runs): prepare() { mkdir /tmp/test-fs modprobe brd rd_nr=1 rd_size=16777216 mkfs.xfs -f /dev/ram0 mount -t xfs /dev/ram0 /tmp/test-fs for i in $(seq 10000); do seq 8000 > "/tmp/test-fs/$i" done mkdir -p /sys/fs/cgroup/system.slice/bench/test/1 echo +memory > /sys/fs/cgroup/system.slice/bench/cgroup.subtree_control echo +memory > /sys/fs/cgroup/system.slice/bench/test/cgroup.subtree_control echo +memory > /sys/fs/cgroup/system.slice/bench/test/1/cgroup.subtree_control echo 768M > /sys/fs/cgroup/system.slice/bench/memory.max } do_test() { read_worker() { mkdir -p "/sys/fs/cgroup/system.slice/bench/test/1/$1" echo $BASHPID > "/sys/fs/cgroup/system.slice/bench/test/1/$1/cgroup.procs" read -r __TMP < "/tmp/test-fs/$1"; } read_in_all() { for i in $(seq 10000); do read_worker "$i" & done; wait } echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches time read_in_all for i in $(seq 1 10000); do rmdir "/sys/fs/cgroup/system.slice/bench/test/1/$i" &>/dev/null done } Before: real 0m3.498s user 0m11.037s sys 0m35.872s real 1m33.860s user 0m11.593s sys 3m1.169s real 1m31.883s user 0m11.265s sys 2m59.198s real 1m32.394s user 0m11.294s sys 3m1.616s real 1m31.017s user 0m11.379s sys 3m1.349s real 1m31.931s user 0m11.295s sys 2m59.863s real 1m32.758s user 0m11.254s sys 2m59.538s real 1m35.198s user 0m11.145s sys 3m1.123s real 1m30.531s user 0m11.393s sys 2m58.089s real 1m31.142s user 0m11.333s sys 3m0.549s After: real 0m3.489s user 0m10.943s sys 0m36.036s real 1m10.893s user 0m11.495s sys 2m38.545s real 1m29.129s user 0m11.382s sys 3m1.601s real 1m29.944s user 0m11.494s sys 3m1.575s real 1m31.208s user 0m11.451s sys 2m59.693s real 1m25.944s user 0m11.327s sys 2m56.394s real 1m28.599s user 0m11.312s sys 3m0.162s real 1m26.746s user 0m11.538s sys 2m55.462s real 1m30.668s user 0m11.475s sys 3m2.075s real 1m29.258s user 0m11.292s sys 3m0.780s Which is slightly faster in real time. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241104175257.60853-5-ryncsn@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Kairui Song <kasong@tencent.com> Cc: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@bytedance.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev> Cc: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com> Cc: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev> Cc: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-11-04 17:52:55 +00:00
static inline struct list_lru_one *
mm/list_lru: split the lock to per-cgroup scope Currently, every list_lru has a per-node lock that protects adding, deletion, isolation, and reparenting of all list_lru_one instances belonging to this list_lru on this node. This lock contention is heavy when multiple cgroups modify the same list_lru. This lock can be split into per-cgroup scope to reduce contention. To achieve this, we need a stable list_lru_one for every cgroup. This commit adds a lock to each list_lru_one and introduced a helper function lock_list_lru_of_memcg, making it possible to pin the list_lru of a memcg. Then reworked the reparenting process. Reparenting will switch the list_lru_one instances one by one. By locking each instance and marking it dead using the nr_items counter, reparenting ensures that all items in the corresponding cgroup (on-list or not, because items have a stable cgroup, see below) will see the list_lru_one switch synchronously. Objcg reparent is also moved after list_lru reparent so items will have a stable mem cgroup until all list_lru_one instances are drained. The only caller that doesn't work the *_obj interfaces are direct calls to list_lru_{add,del}. But it's only used by zswap and that's also based on objcg, so it's fine. This also changes the bahaviour of the isolation function when LRU_RETRY or LRU_REMOVED_RETRY is returned, because now releasing the lock could unblock reparenting and free the list_lru_one, isolation function will have to return withoug re-lock the lru. prepare() { mkdir /tmp/test-fs modprobe brd rd_nr=1 rd_size=33554432 mkfs.xfs -f /dev/ram0 mount -t xfs /dev/ram0 /tmp/test-fs for i in $(seq 1 512); do mkdir "/tmp/test-fs/$i" for j in $(seq 1 10240); do echo TEST-CONTENT > "/tmp/test-fs/$i/$j" done & done; wait } do_test() { read_worker() { sleep 1 tar -cv "$1" &>/dev/null } read_in_all() { cd "/tmp/test-fs" && ls for i in $(seq 1 512); do (exec sh -c 'echo "$PPID"') > "/sys/fs/cgroup/benchmark/$i/cgroup.procs" read_worker "$i" & done; wait } for i in $(seq 1 512); do mkdir -p "/sys/fs/cgroup/benchmark/$i" done echo +memory > /sys/fs/cgroup/benchmark/cgroup.subtree_control echo 512M > /sys/fs/cgroup/benchmark/memory.max echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches time read_in_all } Above script simulates compression of small files in multiple cgroups with memory pressure. Run prepare() then do_test for 6 times: Before: real 0m7.762s user 0m11.340s sys 3m11.224s real 0m8.123s user 0m11.548s sys 3m2.549s real 0m7.736s user 0m11.515s sys 3m11.171s real 0m8.539s user 0m11.508s sys 3m7.618s real 0m7.928s user 0m11.349s sys 3m13.063s real 0m8.105s user 0m11.128s sys 3m14.313s After this commit (about ~15% faster): real 0m6.953s user 0m11.327s sys 2m42.912s real 0m7.453s user 0m11.343s sys 2m51.942s real 0m6.916s user 0m11.269s sys 2m43.957s real 0m6.894s user 0m11.528s sys 2m45.346s real 0m6.911s user 0m11.095s sys 2m43.168s real 0m6.773s user 0m11.518s sys 2m40.774s Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241104175257.60853-6-ryncsn@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Kairui Song <kasong@tencent.com> Cc: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@bytedance.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev> Cc: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com> Cc: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev> Cc: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-11-04 17:52:56 +00:00
lock_list_lru_of_memcg(struct list_lru *lru, int nid, struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
bool irq, bool skip_empty)
mm/list_lru: simplify reparenting and initial allocation Currently, there is a lot of code for detecting reparent racing using kmemcg_id as the synchronization flag. And an intermediate table is required to record and compare the kmemcg_id. We can simplify this by just checking the cgroup css status, skip if cgroup is being offlined. On the reparenting side, ensure no more allocation is on going and no further allocation will occur by using the XArray lock as barrier. Combined with a O(n^2) top-down walk for the allocation, we get rid of the intermediate table allocation completely. Despite being O(n^2), it should be actually faster because it's not practical to have a very deep cgroup level, and in most cases the parent cgroup should have been allocated already. This also avoided changing kmemcg_id before reparenting, making cgroups have a stable index for list_lru_memcg. After this change it's possible that a dying cgroup will see a NULL value in XArray corresponding to the kmemcg_id, because the kmemcg_id will point to an empty slot. In such case, just fallback to use its parent. As a result the code is simpler, following test also showed a very slight performance gain (12 test runs): prepare() { mkdir /tmp/test-fs modprobe brd rd_nr=1 rd_size=16777216 mkfs.xfs -f /dev/ram0 mount -t xfs /dev/ram0 /tmp/test-fs for i in $(seq 10000); do seq 8000 > "/tmp/test-fs/$i" done mkdir -p /sys/fs/cgroup/system.slice/bench/test/1 echo +memory > /sys/fs/cgroup/system.slice/bench/cgroup.subtree_control echo +memory > /sys/fs/cgroup/system.slice/bench/test/cgroup.subtree_control echo +memory > /sys/fs/cgroup/system.slice/bench/test/1/cgroup.subtree_control echo 768M > /sys/fs/cgroup/system.slice/bench/memory.max } do_test() { read_worker() { mkdir -p "/sys/fs/cgroup/system.slice/bench/test/1/$1" echo $BASHPID > "/sys/fs/cgroup/system.slice/bench/test/1/$1/cgroup.procs" read -r __TMP < "/tmp/test-fs/$1"; } read_in_all() { for i in $(seq 10000); do read_worker "$i" & done; wait } echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches time read_in_all for i in $(seq 1 10000); do rmdir "/sys/fs/cgroup/system.slice/bench/test/1/$i" &>/dev/null done } Before: real 0m3.498s user 0m11.037s sys 0m35.872s real 1m33.860s user 0m11.593s sys 3m1.169s real 1m31.883s user 0m11.265s sys 2m59.198s real 1m32.394s user 0m11.294s sys 3m1.616s real 1m31.017s user 0m11.379s sys 3m1.349s real 1m31.931s user 0m11.295s sys 2m59.863s real 1m32.758s user 0m11.254s sys 2m59.538s real 1m35.198s user 0m11.145s sys 3m1.123s real 1m30.531s user 0m11.393s sys 2m58.089s real 1m31.142s user 0m11.333s sys 3m0.549s After: real 0m3.489s user 0m10.943s sys 0m36.036s real 1m10.893s user 0m11.495s sys 2m38.545s real 1m29.129s user 0m11.382s sys 3m1.601s real 1m29.944s user 0m11.494s sys 3m1.575s real 1m31.208s user 0m11.451s sys 2m59.693s real 1m25.944s user 0m11.327s sys 2m56.394s real 1m28.599s user 0m11.312s sys 3m0.162s real 1m26.746s user 0m11.538s sys 2m55.462s real 1m30.668s user 0m11.475s sys 3m2.075s real 1m29.258s user 0m11.292s sys 3m0.780s Which is slightly faster in real time. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241104175257.60853-5-ryncsn@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Kairui Song <kasong@tencent.com> Cc: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@bytedance.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev> Cc: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com> Cc: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev> Cc: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-11-04 17:52:55 +00:00
{
struct list_lru_one *l;
mm/list_lru: split the lock to per-cgroup scope Currently, every list_lru has a per-node lock that protects adding, deletion, isolation, and reparenting of all list_lru_one instances belonging to this list_lru on this node. This lock contention is heavy when multiple cgroups modify the same list_lru. This lock can be split into per-cgroup scope to reduce contention. To achieve this, we need a stable list_lru_one for every cgroup. This commit adds a lock to each list_lru_one and introduced a helper function lock_list_lru_of_memcg, making it possible to pin the list_lru of a memcg. Then reworked the reparenting process. Reparenting will switch the list_lru_one instances one by one. By locking each instance and marking it dead using the nr_items counter, reparenting ensures that all items in the corresponding cgroup (on-list or not, because items have a stable cgroup, see below) will see the list_lru_one switch synchronously. Objcg reparent is also moved after list_lru reparent so items will have a stable mem cgroup until all list_lru_one instances are drained. The only caller that doesn't work the *_obj interfaces are direct calls to list_lru_{add,del}. But it's only used by zswap and that's also based on objcg, so it's fine. This also changes the bahaviour of the isolation function when LRU_RETRY or LRU_REMOVED_RETRY is returned, because now releasing the lock could unblock reparenting and free the list_lru_one, isolation function will have to return withoug re-lock the lru. prepare() { mkdir /tmp/test-fs modprobe brd rd_nr=1 rd_size=33554432 mkfs.xfs -f /dev/ram0 mount -t xfs /dev/ram0 /tmp/test-fs for i in $(seq 1 512); do mkdir "/tmp/test-fs/$i" for j in $(seq 1 10240); do echo TEST-CONTENT > "/tmp/test-fs/$i/$j" done & done; wait } do_test() { read_worker() { sleep 1 tar -cv "$1" &>/dev/null } read_in_all() { cd "/tmp/test-fs" && ls for i in $(seq 1 512); do (exec sh -c 'echo "$PPID"') > "/sys/fs/cgroup/benchmark/$i/cgroup.procs" read_worker "$i" & done; wait } for i in $(seq 1 512); do mkdir -p "/sys/fs/cgroup/benchmark/$i" done echo +memory > /sys/fs/cgroup/benchmark/cgroup.subtree_control echo 512M > /sys/fs/cgroup/benchmark/memory.max echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches time read_in_all } Above script simulates compression of small files in multiple cgroups with memory pressure. Run prepare() then do_test for 6 times: Before: real 0m7.762s user 0m11.340s sys 3m11.224s real 0m8.123s user 0m11.548s sys 3m2.549s real 0m7.736s user 0m11.515s sys 3m11.171s real 0m8.539s user 0m11.508s sys 3m7.618s real 0m7.928s user 0m11.349s sys 3m13.063s real 0m8.105s user 0m11.128s sys 3m14.313s After this commit (about ~15% faster): real 0m6.953s user 0m11.327s sys 2m42.912s real 0m7.453s user 0m11.343s sys 2m51.942s real 0m6.916s user 0m11.269s sys 2m43.957s real 0m6.894s user 0m11.528s sys 2m45.346s real 0m6.911s user 0m11.095s sys 2m43.168s real 0m6.773s user 0m11.518s sys 2m40.774s Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241104175257.60853-6-ryncsn@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Kairui Song <kasong@tencent.com> Cc: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@bytedance.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev> Cc: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com> Cc: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev> Cc: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-11-04 17:52:56 +00:00
long nr_items;
rcu_read_lock();
mm/list_lru: simplify reparenting and initial allocation Currently, there is a lot of code for detecting reparent racing using kmemcg_id as the synchronization flag. And an intermediate table is required to record and compare the kmemcg_id. We can simplify this by just checking the cgroup css status, skip if cgroup is being offlined. On the reparenting side, ensure no more allocation is on going and no further allocation will occur by using the XArray lock as barrier. Combined with a O(n^2) top-down walk for the allocation, we get rid of the intermediate table allocation completely. Despite being O(n^2), it should be actually faster because it's not practical to have a very deep cgroup level, and in most cases the parent cgroup should have been allocated already. This also avoided changing kmemcg_id before reparenting, making cgroups have a stable index for list_lru_memcg. After this change it's possible that a dying cgroup will see a NULL value in XArray corresponding to the kmemcg_id, because the kmemcg_id will point to an empty slot. In such case, just fallback to use its parent. As a result the code is simpler, following test also showed a very slight performance gain (12 test runs): prepare() { mkdir /tmp/test-fs modprobe brd rd_nr=1 rd_size=16777216 mkfs.xfs -f /dev/ram0 mount -t xfs /dev/ram0 /tmp/test-fs for i in $(seq 10000); do seq 8000 > "/tmp/test-fs/$i" done mkdir -p /sys/fs/cgroup/system.slice/bench/test/1 echo +memory > /sys/fs/cgroup/system.slice/bench/cgroup.subtree_control echo +memory > /sys/fs/cgroup/system.slice/bench/test/cgroup.subtree_control echo +memory > /sys/fs/cgroup/system.slice/bench/test/1/cgroup.subtree_control echo 768M > /sys/fs/cgroup/system.slice/bench/memory.max } do_test() { read_worker() { mkdir -p "/sys/fs/cgroup/system.slice/bench/test/1/$1" echo $BASHPID > "/sys/fs/cgroup/system.slice/bench/test/1/$1/cgroup.procs" read -r __TMP < "/tmp/test-fs/$1"; } read_in_all() { for i in $(seq 10000); do read_worker "$i" & done; wait } echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches time read_in_all for i in $(seq 1 10000); do rmdir "/sys/fs/cgroup/system.slice/bench/test/1/$i" &>/dev/null done } Before: real 0m3.498s user 0m11.037s sys 0m35.872s real 1m33.860s user 0m11.593s sys 3m1.169s real 1m31.883s user 0m11.265s sys 2m59.198s real 1m32.394s user 0m11.294s sys 3m1.616s real 1m31.017s user 0m11.379s sys 3m1.349s real 1m31.931s user 0m11.295s sys 2m59.863s real 1m32.758s user 0m11.254s sys 2m59.538s real 1m35.198s user 0m11.145s sys 3m1.123s real 1m30.531s user 0m11.393s sys 2m58.089s real 1m31.142s user 0m11.333s sys 3m0.549s After: real 0m3.489s user 0m10.943s sys 0m36.036s real 1m10.893s user 0m11.495s sys 2m38.545s real 1m29.129s user 0m11.382s sys 3m1.601s real 1m29.944s user 0m11.494s sys 3m1.575s real 1m31.208s user 0m11.451s sys 2m59.693s real 1m25.944s user 0m11.327s sys 2m56.394s real 1m28.599s user 0m11.312s sys 3m0.162s real 1m26.746s user 0m11.538s sys 2m55.462s real 1m30.668s user 0m11.475s sys 3m2.075s real 1m29.258s user 0m11.292s sys 3m0.780s Which is slightly faster in real time. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241104175257.60853-5-ryncsn@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Kairui Song <kasong@tencent.com> Cc: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@bytedance.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev> Cc: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com> Cc: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev> Cc: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-11-04 17:52:55 +00:00
again:
l = list_lru_from_memcg_idx(lru, nid, memcg_kmem_id(memcg));
mm/list_lru: split the lock to per-cgroup scope Currently, every list_lru has a per-node lock that protects adding, deletion, isolation, and reparenting of all list_lru_one instances belonging to this list_lru on this node. This lock contention is heavy when multiple cgroups modify the same list_lru. This lock can be split into per-cgroup scope to reduce contention. To achieve this, we need a stable list_lru_one for every cgroup. This commit adds a lock to each list_lru_one and introduced a helper function lock_list_lru_of_memcg, making it possible to pin the list_lru of a memcg. Then reworked the reparenting process. Reparenting will switch the list_lru_one instances one by one. By locking each instance and marking it dead using the nr_items counter, reparenting ensures that all items in the corresponding cgroup (on-list or not, because items have a stable cgroup, see below) will see the list_lru_one switch synchronously. Objcg reparent is also moved after list_lru reparent so items will have a stable mem cgroup until all list_lru_one instances are drained. The only caller that doesn't work the *_obj interfaces are direct calls to list_lru_{add,del}. But it's only used by zswap and that's also based on objcg, so it's fine. This also changes the bahaviour of the isolation function when LRU_RETRY or LRU_REMOVED_RETRY is returned, because now releasing the lock could unblock reparenting and free the list_lru_one, isolation function will have to return withoug re-lock the lru. prepare() { mkdir /tmp/test-fs modprobe brd rd_nr=1 rd_size=33554432 mkfs.xfs -f /dev/ram0 mount -t xfs /dev/ram0 /tmp/test-fs for i in $(seq 1 512); do mkdir "/tmp/test-fs/$i" for j in $(seq 1 10240); do echo TEST-CONTENT > "/tmp/test-fs/$i/$j" done & done; wait } do_test() { read_worker() { sleep 1 tar -cv "$1" &>/dev/null } read_in_all() { cd "/tmp/test-fs" && ls for i in $(seq 1 512); do (exec sh -c 'echo "$PPID"') > "/sys/fs/cgroup/benchmark/$i/cgroup.procs" read_worker "$i" & done; wait } for i in $(seq 1 512); do mkdir -p "/sys/fs/cgroup/benchmark/$i" done echo +memory > /sys/fs/cgroup/benchmark/cgroup.subtree_control echo 512M > /sys/fs/cgroup/benchmark/memory.max echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches time read_in_all } Above script simulates compression of small files in multiple cgroups with memory pressure. Run prepare() then do_test for 6 times: Before: real 0m7.762s user 0m11.340s sys 3m11.224s real 0m8.123s user 0m11.548s sys 3m2.549s real 0m7.736s user 0m11.515s sys 3m11.171s real 0m8.539s user 0m11.508s sys 3m7.618s real 0m7.928s user 0m11.349s sys 3m13.063s real 0m8.105s user 0m11.128s sys 3m14.313s After this commit (about ~15% faster): real 0m6.953s user 0m11.327s sys 2m42.912s real 0m7.453s user 0m11.343s sys 2m51.942s real 0m6.916s user 0m11.269s sys 2m43.957s real 0m6.894s user 0m11.528s sys 2m45.346s real 0m6.911s user 0m11.095s sys 2m43.168s real 0m6.773s user 0m11.518s sys 2m40.774s Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241104175257.60853-6-ryncsn@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Kairui Song <kasong@tencent.com> Cc: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@bytedance.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev> Cc: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com> Cc: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev> Cc: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-11-04 17:52:56 +00:00
if (likely(l)) {
if (irq)
spin_lock_irq(&l->lock);
else
spin_lock(&l->lock);
nr_items = READ_ONCE(l->nr_items);
if (likely(nr_items != LONG_MIN)) {
WARN_ON(nr_items < 0);
rcu_read_unlock();
return l;
}
if (irq)
spin_unlock_irq(&l->lock);
else
spin_unlock(&l->lock);
}
/*
* Caller may simply bail out if raced with reparenting or
* may iterate through the list_lru and expect empty slots.
*/
if (skip_empty) {
rcu_read_unlock();
return NULL;
}
mm/list_lru: simplify reparenting and initial allocation Currently, there is a lot of code for detecting reparent racing using kmemcg_id as the synchronization flag. And an intermediate table is required to record and compare the kmemcg_id. We can simplify this by just checking the cgroup css status, skip if cgroup is being offlined. On the reparenting side, ensure no more allocation is on going and no further allocation will occur by using the XArray lock as barrier. Combined with a O(n^2) top-down walk for the allocation, we get rid of the intermediate table allocation completely. Despite being O(n^2), it should be actually faster because it's not practical to have a very deep cgroup level, and in most cases the parent cgroup should have been allocated already. This also avoided changing kmemcg_id before reparenting, making cgroups have a stable index for list_lru_memcg. After this change it's possible that a dying cgroup will see a NULL value in XArray corresponding to the kmemcg_id, because the kmemcg_id will point to an empty slot. In such case, just fallback to use its parent. As a result the code is simpler, following test also showed a very slight performance gain (12 test runs): prepare() { mkdir /tmp/test-fs modprobe brd rd_nr=1 rd_size=16777216 mkfs.xfs -f /dev/ram0 mount -t xfs /dev/ram0 /tmp/test-fs for i in $(seq 10000); do seq 8000 > "/tmp/test-fs/$i" done mkdir -p /sys/fs/cgroup/system.slice/bench/test/1 echo +memory > /sys/fs/cgroup/system.slice/bench/cgroup.subtree_control echo +memory > /sys/fs/cgroup/system.slice/bench/test/cgroup.subtree_control echo +memory > /sys/fs/cgroup/system.slice/bench/test/1/cgroup.subtree_control echo 768M > /sys/fs/cgroup/system.slice/bench/memory.max } do_test() { read_worker() { mkdir -p "/sys/fs/cgroup/system.slice/bench/test/1/$1" echo $BASHPID > "/sys/fs/cgroup/system.slice/bench/test/1/$1/cgroup.procs" read -r __TMP < "/tmp/test-fs/$1"; } read_in_all() { for i in $(seq 10000); do read_worker "$i" & done; wait } echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches time read_in_all for i in $(seq 1 10000); do rmdir "/sys/fs/cgroup/system.slice/bench/test/1/$i" &>/dev/null done } Before: real 0m3.498s user 0m11.037s sys 0m35.872s real 1m33.860s user 0m11.593s sys 3m1.169s real 1m31.883s user 0m11.265s sys 2m59.198s real 1m32.394s user 0m11.294s sys 3m1.616s real 1m31.017s user 0m11.379s sys 3m1.349s real 1m31.931s user 0m11.295s sys 2m59.863s real 1m32.758s user 0m11.254s sys 2m59.538s real 1m35.198s user 0m11.145s sys 3m1.123s real 1m30.531s user 0m11.393s sys 2m58.089s real 1m31.142s user 0m11.333s sys 3m0.549s After: real 0m3.489s user 0m10.943s sys 0m36.036s real 1m10.893s user 0m11.495s sys 2m38.545s real 1m29.129s user 0m11.382s sys 3m1.601s real 1m29.944s user 0m11.494s sys 3m1.575s real 1m31.208s user 0m11.451s sys 2m59.693s real 1m25.944s user 0m11.327s sys 2m56.394s real 1m28.599s user 0m11.312s sys 3m0.162s real 1m26.746s user 0m11.538s sys 2m55.462s real 1m30.668s user 0m11.475s sys 3m2.075s real 1m29.258s user 0m11.292s sys 3m0.780s Which is slightly faster in real time. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241104175257.60853-5-ryncsn@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Kairui Song <kasong@tencent.com> Cc: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@bytedance.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev> Cc: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com> Cc: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev> Cc: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-11-04 17:52:55 +00:00
VM_WARN_ON(!css_is_dying(&memcg->css));
mm/list_lru: split the lock to per-cgroup scope Currently, every list_lru has a per-node lock that protects adding, deletion, isolation, and reparenting of all list_lru_one instances belonging to this list_lru on this node. This lock contention is heavy when multiple cgroups modify the same list_lru. This lock can be split into per-cgroup scope to reduce contention. To achieve this, we need a stable list_lru_one for every cgroup. This commit adds a lock to each list_lru_one and introduced a helper function lock_list_lru_of_memcg, making it possible to pin the list_lru of a memcg. Then reworked the reparenting process. Reparenting will switch the list_lru_one instances one by one. By locking each instance and marking it dead using the nr_items counter, reparenting ensures that all items in the corresponding cgroup (on-list or not, because items have a stable cgroup, see below) will see the list_lru_one switch synchronously. Objcg reparent is also moved after list_lru reparent so items will have a stable mem cgroup until all list_lru_one instances are drained. The only caller that doesn't work the *_obj interfaces are direct calls to list_lru_{add,del}. But it's only used by zswap and that's also based on objcg, so it's fine. This also changes the bahaviour of the isolation function when LRU_RETRY or LRU_REMOVED_RETRY is returned, because now releasing the lock could unblock reparenting and free the list_lru_one, isolation function will have to return withoug re-lock the lru. prepare() { mkdir /tmp/test-fs modprobe brd rd_nr=1 rd_size=33554432 mkfs.xfs -f /dev/ram0 mount -t xfs /dev/ram0 /tmp/test-fs for i in $(seq 1 512); do mkdir "/tmp/test-fs/$i" for j in $(seq 1 10240); do echo TEST-CONTENT > "/tmp/test-fs/$i/$j" done & done; wait } do_test() { read_worker() { sleep 1 tar -cv "$1" &>/dev/null } read_in_all() { cd "/tmp/test-fs" && ls for i in $(seq 1 512); do (exec sh -c 'echo "$PPID"') > "/sys/fs/cgroup/benchmark/$i/cgroup.procs" read_worker "$i" & done; wait } for i in $(seq 1 512); do mkdir -p "/sys/fs/cgroup/benchmark/$i" done echo +memory > /sys/fs/cgroup/benchmark/cgroup.subtree_control echo 512M > /sys/fs/cgroup/benchmark/memory.max echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches time read_in_all } Above script simulates compression of small files in multiple cgroups with memory pressure. Run prepare() then do_test for 6 times: Before: real 0m7.762s user 0m11.340s sys 3m11.224s real 0m8.123s user 0m11.548s sys 3m2.549s real 0m7.736s user 0m11.515s sys 3m11.171s real 0m8.539s user 0m11.508s sys 3m7.618s real 0m7.928s user 0m11.349s sys 3m13.063s real 0m8.105s user 0m11.128s sys 3m14.313s After this commit (about ~15% faster): real 0m6.953s user 0m11.327s sys 2m42.912s real 0m7.453s user 0m11.343s sys 2m51.942s real 0m6.916s user 0m11.269s sys 2m43.957s real 0m6.894s user 0m11.528s sys 2m45.346s real 0m6.911s user 0m11.095s sys 2m43.168s real 0m6.773s user 0m11.518s sys 2m40.774s Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241104175257.60853-6-ryncsn@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Kairui Song <kasong@tencent.com> Cc: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@bytedance.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev> Cc: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com> Cc: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev> Cc: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-11-04 17:52:56 +00:00
memcg = parent_mem_cgroup(memcg);
mm/list_lru: simplify reparenting and initial allocation Currently, there is a lot of code for detecting reparent racing using kmemcg_id as the synchronization flag. And an intermediate table is required to record and compare the kmemcg_id. We can simplify this by just checking the cgroup css status, skip if cgroup is being offlined. On the reparenting side, ensure no more allocation is on going and no further allocation will occur by using the XArray lock as barrier. Combined with a O(n^2) top-down walk for the allocation, we get rid of the intermediate table allocation completely. Despite being O(n^2), it should be actually faster because it's not practical to have a very deep cgroup level, and in most cases the parent cgroup should have been allocated already. This also avoided changing kmemcg_id before reparenting, making cgroups have a stable index for list_lru_memcg. After this change it's possible that a dying cgroup will see a NULL value in XArray corresponding to the kmemcg_id, because the kmemcg_id will point to an empty slot. In such case, just fallback to use its parent. As a result the code is simpler, following test also showed a very slight performance gain (12 test runs): prepare() { mkdir /tmp/test-fs modprobe brd rd_nr=1 rd_size=16777216 mkfs.xfs -f /dev/ram0 mount -t xfs /dev/ram0 /tmp/test-fs for i in $(seq 10000); do seq 8000 > "/tmp/test-fs/$i" done mkdir -p /sys/fs/cgroup/system.slice/bench/test/1 echo +memory > /sys/fs/cgroup/system.slice/bench/cgroup.subtree_control echo +memory > /sys/fs/cgroup/system.slice/bench/test/cgroup.subtree_control echo +memory > /sys/fs/cgroup/system.slice/bench/test/1/cgroup.subtree_control echo 768M > /sys/fs/cgroup/system.slice/bench/memory.max } do_test() { read_worker() { mkdir -p "/sys/fs/cgroup/system.slice/bench/test/1/$1" echo $BASHPID > "/sys/fs/cgroup/system.slice/bench/test/1/$1/cgroup.procs" read -r __TMP < "/tmp/test-fs/$1"; } read_in_all() { for i in $(seq 10000); do read_worker "$i" & done; wait } echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches time read_in_all for i in $(seq 1 10000); do rmdir "/sys/fs/cgroup/system.slice/bench/test/1/$i" &>/dev/null done } Before: real 0m3.498s user 0m11.037s sys 0m35.872s real 1m33.860s user 0m11.593s sys 3m1.169s real 1m31.883s user 0m11.265s sys 2m59.198s real 1m32.394s user 0m11.294s sys 3m1.616s real 1m31.017s user 0m11.379s sys 3m1.349s real 1m31.931s user 0m11.295s sys 2m59.863s real 1m32.758s user 0m11.254s sys 2m59.538s real 1m35.198s user 0m11.145s sys 3m1.123s real 1m30.531s user 0m11.393s sys 2m58.089s real 1m31.142s user 0m11.333s sys 3m0.549s After: real 0m3.489s user 0m10.943s sys 0m36.036s real 1m10.893s user 0m11.495s sys 2m38.545s real 1m29.129s user 0m11.382s sys 3m1.601s real 1m29.944s user 0m11.494s sys 3m1.575s real 1m31.208s user 0m11.451s sys 2m59.693s real 1m25.944s user 0m11.327s sys 2m56.394s real 1m28.599s user 0m11.312s sys 3m0.162s real 1m26.746s user 0m11.538s sys 2m55.462s real 1m30.668s user 0m11.475s sys 3m2.075s real 1m29.258s user 0m11.292s sys 3m0.780s Which is slightly faster in real time. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241104175257.60853-5-ryncsn@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Kairui Song <kasong@tencent.com> Cc: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@bytedance.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev> Cc: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com> Cc: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev> Cc: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-11-04 17:52:55 +00:00
goto again;
}
mm/list_lru: split the lock to per-cgroup scope Currently, every list_lru has a per-node lock that protects adding, deletion, isolation, and reparenting of all list_lru_one instances belonging to this list_lru on this node. This lock contention is heavy when multiple cgroups modify the same list_lru. This lock can be split into per-cgroup scope to reduce contention. To achieve this, we need a stable list_lru_one for every cgroup. This commit adds a lock to each list_lru_one and introduced a helper function lock_list_lru_of_memcg, making it possible to pin the list_lru of a memcg. Then reworked the reparenting process. Reparenting will switch the list_lru_one instances one by one. By locking each instance and marking it dead using the nr_items counter, reparenting ensures that all items in the corresponding cgroup (on-list or not, because items have a stable cgroup, see below) will see the list_lru_one switch synchronously. Objcg reparent is also moved after list_lru reparent so items will have a stable mem cgroup until all list_lru_one instances are drained. The only caller that doesn't work the *_obj interfaces are direct calls to list_lru_{add,del}. But it's only used by zswap and that's also based on objcg, so it's fine. This also changes the bahaviour of the isolation function when LRU_RETRY or LRU_REMOVED_RETRY is returned, because now releasing the lock could unblock reparenting and free the list_lru_one, isolation function will have to return withoug re-lock the lru. prepare() { mkdir /tmp/test-fs modprobe brd rd_nr=1 rd_size=33554432 mkfs.xfs -f /dev/ram0 mount -t xfs /dev/ram0 /tmp/test-fs for i in $(seq 1 512); do mkdir "/tmp/test-fs/$i" for j in $(seq 1 10240); do echo TEST-CONTENT > "/tmp/test-fs/$i/$j" done & done; wait } do_test() { read_worker() { sleep 1 tar -cv "$1" &>/dev/null } read_in_all() { cd "/tmp/test-fs" && ls for i in $(seq 1 512); do (exec sh -c 'echo "$PPID"') > "/sys/fs/cgroup/benchmark/$i/cgroup.procs" read_worker "$i" & done; wait } for i in $(seq 1 512); do mkdir -p "/sys/fs/cgroup/benchmark/$i" done echo +memory > /sys/fs/cgroup/benchmark/cgroup.subtree_control echo 512M > /sys/fs/cgroup/benchmark/memory.max echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches time read_in_all } Above script simulates compression of small files in multiple cgroups with memory pressure. Run prepare() then do_test for 6 times: Before: real 0m7.762s user 0m11.340s sys 3m11.224s real 0m8.123s user 0m11.548s sys 3m2.549s real 0m7.736s user 0m11.515s sys 3m11.171s real 0m8.539s user 0m11.508s sys 3m7.618s real 0m7.928s user 0m11.349s sys 3m13.063s real 0m8.105s user 0m11.128s sys 3m14.313s After this commit (about ~15% faster): real 0m6.953s user 0m11.327s sys 2m42.912s real 0m7.453s user 0m11.343s sys 2m51.942s real 0m6.916s user 0m11.269s sys 2m43.957s real 0m6.894s user 0m11.528s sys 2m45.346s real 0m6.911s user 0m11.095s sys 2m43.168s real 0m6.773s user 0m11.518s sys 2m40.774s Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241104175257.60853-6-ryncsn@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Kairui Song <kasong@tencent.com> Cc: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@bytedance.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev> Cc: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com> Cc: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev> Cc: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-11-04 17:52:56 +00:00
static inline void unlock_list_lru(struct list_lru_one *l, bool irq_off)
{
if (irq_off)
spin_unlock_irq(&l->lock);
else
spin_unlock(&l->lock);
}
list_lru: introduce per-memcg lists There are several FS shrinkers, including super_block::s_shrink, that keep reclaimable objects in the list_lru structure. Hence to turn them to memcg-aware shrinkers, it is enough to make list_lru per-memcg. This patch does the trick. It adds an array of lru lists to the list_lru_node structure (per-node part of the list_lru), one for each kmem-active memcg, and dispatches every item addition or removal to the list corresponding to the memcg which the item is accounted to. So now the list_lru structure is not just per node, but per node and per memcg. Not all list_lrus need this feature, so this patch also adds a new method, list_lru_init_memcg, which initializes a list_lru as memcg aware. Otherwise (i.e. if initialized with old list_lru_init), the list_lru won't have per memcg lists. Just like per memcg caches arrays, the arrays of per-memcg lists are indexed by memcg_cache_id, so we must grow them whenever memcg_nr_cache_ids is increased. So we introduce a callback, memcg_update_all_list_lrus, invoked by memcg_alloc_cache_id if the id space is full. The locking is implemented in a manner similar to lruvecs, i.e. we have one lock per node that protects all lists (both global and per cgroup) on the node. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@parallels.com> Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz> Cc: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com> Cc: Glauber Costa <glommer@gmail.com> Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com> Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2015-02-12 22:59:10 +00:00
#else
mm/list_lru.c: combine code under the same define Patch series "Improve shrink_slab() scalability (old complexity was O(n^2), new is O(n))", v8. This patcheset solves the problem with slow shrink_slab() occuring on the machines having many shrinkers and memory cgroups (i.e., with many containers). The problem is complexity of shrink_slab() is O(n^2) and it grows too fast with the growth of containers numbers. Let us have 200 containers, and every container has 10 mounts and 10 cgroups. All container tasks are isolated, and they don't touch foreign containers mounts. In case of global reclaim, a task has to iterate all over the memcgs and to call all the memcg-aware shrinkers for all of them. This means, the task has to visit 200 * 10 = 2000 shrinkers for every memcg, and since there are 2000 memcgs, the total calls of do_shrink_slab() are 2000 * 2000 = 4000000. 4 million calls are not a number operations, which can takes 1 cpu cycle. E.g., super_cache_count() accesses at least two lists, and makes arifmetical calculations. Even, if there are no charged objects, we do these calculations, and replaces cpu caches by read memory. I observed nodes spending almost 100% time in kernel, in case of intensive writing and global reclaim. The writer consumes pages fast, but it's need to shrink_slab() before the reclaimer reached shrink pages function (and frees SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX pages). Even if there is no writing, the iterations just waste the time, and slows reclaim down. Let's see the small test below: $echo 1 > /sys/fs/cgroup/memory/memory.use_hierarchy $mkdir /sys/fs/cgroup/memory/ct $echo 4000M > /sys/fs/cgroup/memory/ct/memory.kmem.limit_in_bytes $for i in `seq 0 4000`; do mkdir /sys/fs/cgroup/memory/ct/$i; echo $$ > /sys/fs/cgroup/memory/ct/$i/cgroup.procs; mkdir -p s/$i; mount -t tmpfs $i s/$i; touch s/$i/file; done Then, let's see drop caches time (5 sequential calls): $time echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches 0.00user 13.78system 0:13.78elapsed 99%CPU 0.00user 5.59system 0:05.60elapsed 99%CPU 0.00user 5.48system 0:05.48elapsed 99%CPU 0.00user 8.35system 0:08.35elapsed 99%CPU 0.00user 8.34system 0:08.35elapsed 99%CPU The last four calls don't actually shrink anything. So, the iterations over slab shrinkers take 5.48 seconds. Not so good for scalability. The patchset solves the problem by making shrink_slab() of O(n) complexity. There are following functional actions: 1) Assign id to every registered memcg-aware shrinker. 2) Maintain per-memcgroup bitmap of memcg-aware shrinkers, and set a shrinker-related bit after the first element is added to lru list (also, when removed child memcg elements are reparanted). 3) Split memcg-aware shrinkers and !memcg-aware shrinkers, and call a shrinker if its bit is set in memcg's shrinker bitmap. (Also, there is a functionality to clear the bit, after last element is shrinked). This gives significant performance increase. The result after patchset is applied: $time echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches 0.00user 1.10system 0:01.10elapsed 99%CPU 0.00user 0.00system 0:00.01elapsed 64%CPU 0.00user 0.01system 0:00.01elapsed 82%CPU 0.00user 0.00system 0:00.01elapsed 64%CPU 0.00user 0.01system 0:00.01elapsed 82%CPU The results show the performance increases at least in 548 times. So, the patchset makes shrink_slab() of less complexity and improves the performance in such types of load I pointed. This will give a profit in case of !global reclaim case, since there also will be less do_shrink_slab() calls. This patch (of 17): These two pairs of blocks of code are under the same #ifdef #else #endif. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/153063052519.1818.9393587113056959488.stgit@localhost.localdomain Signed-off-by: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@virtuozzo.com> Acked-by: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com> Tested-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com> Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@nexb.com> Cc: Sahitya Tummala <stummala@codeaurora.org> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Cc: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com> Cc: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org> Cc: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org> Cc: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net> Cc: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com> Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Li RongQing <lirongqing@baidu.com> Cc: Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@virtuozzo.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2018-08-17 22:47:21 +00:00
static void list_lru_register(struct list_lru *lru)
{
}
static void list_lru_unregister(struct list_lru *lru)
{
}
mm/list_lru.c: set bit in memcg shrinker bitmap on first list_lru item appearance Introduce set_shrinker_bit() function to set shrinker-related bit in memcg shrinker bitmap, and set the bit after the first item is added and in case of reparenting destroyed memcg's items. This will allow next patch to make shrinkers be called only, in case of they have charged objects at the moment, and to improve shrink_slab() performance. [ktkhai@virtuozzo.com: v9] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/153112557572.4097.17315791419810749985.stgit@localhost.localdomain Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/153063065671.1818.15914674956134687268.stgit@localhost.localdomain Signed-off-by: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@virtuozzo.com> Acked-by: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com> Tested-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com> Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@virtuozzo.com> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Cc: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com> Cc: Li RongQing <lirongqing@baidu.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org> Cc: Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@nexb.com> Cc: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com> Cc: Sahitya Tummala <stummala@codeaurora.org> Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Cc: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2018-08-17 22:48:10 +00:00
static int lru_shrinker_id(struct list_lru *lru)
{
return -1;
}
list_lru: introduce per-memcg lists There are several FS shrinkers, including super_block::s_shrink, that keep reclaimable objects in the list_lru structure. Hence to turn them to memcg-aware shrinkers, it is enough to make list_lru per-memcg. This patch does the trick. It adds an array of lru lists to the list_lru_node structure (per-node part of the list_lru), one for each kmem-active memcg, and dispatches every item addition or removal to the list corresponding to the memcg which the item is accounted to. So now the list_lru structure is not just per node, but per node and per memcg. Not all list_lrus need this feature, so this patch also adds a new method, list_lru_init_memcg, which initializes a list_lru as memcg aware. Otherwise (i.e. if initialized with old list_lru_init), the list_lru won't have per memcg lists. Just like per memcg caches arrays, the arrays of per-memcg lists are indexed by memcg_cache_id, so we must grow them whenever memcg_nr_cache_ids is increased. So we introduce a callback, memcg_update_all_list_lrus, invoked by memcg_alloc_cache_id if the id space is full. The locking is implemented in a manner similar to lruvecs, i.e. we have one lock per node that protects all lists (both global and per cgroup) on the node. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@parallels.com> Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz> Cc: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com> Cc: Glauber Costa <glommer@gmail.com> Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com> Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2015-02-12 22:59:10 +00:00
static inline bool list_lru_memcg_aware(struct list_lru *lru)
{
return false;
}
static inline struct list_lru_one *
mm: list_lru: transpose the array of per-node per-memcg lru lists Patch series "Optimize list lru memory consumption", v6. In our server, we found a suspected memory leak problem. The kmalloc-32 consumes more than 6GB of memory. Other kmem_caches consume less than 2GB memory. After our in-depth analysis, the memory consumption of kmalloc-32 slab cache is the cause of list_lru_one allocation. crash> p memcg_nr_cache_ids memcg_nr_cache_ids = $2 = 24574 memcg_nr_cache_ids is very large and memory consumption of each list_lru can be calculated with the following formula. num_numa_node * memcg_nr_cache_ids * 32 (kmalloc-32) There are 4 numa nodes in our system, so each list_lru consumes ~3MB. crash> list super_blocks | wc -l 952 Every mount will register 2 list lrus, one is for inode, another is for dentry. There are 952 super_blocks. So the total memory is 952 * 2 * 3 MB (~5.6GB). But now the number of memory cgroups is less than 500. So I guess more than 12286 memory cgroups have been created on this machine (I do not know why there are so many cgroups, it may be a user's bug or the user really want to do that). Because memcg_nr_cache_ids has not been reduced to a suitable value. It leads to waste a lot of memory. If we want to reduce memcg_nr_cache_ids, we have to *reboot* the server. This is not what we want. In order to reduce memcg_nr_cache_ids, I had posted a patchset [1] to do this. But this did not fundamentally solve the problem. We currently allocate scope for every memcg to be able to tracked on every superblock instantiated in the system, regardless of whether that superblock is even accessible to that memcg. These huge memcg counts come from container hosts where memcgs are confined to just a small subset of the total number of superblocks that instantiated at any given point in time. For these systems with huge container counts, list_lru does not need the capability of tracking every memcg on every superblock. What it comes down to is that the list_lru is only needed for a given memcg if that memcg is instatiating and freeing objects on a given list_lru. As Dave said, "Which makes me think we should be moving more towards 'add the memcg to the list_lru at the first insert' model rather than 'instantiate all at memcg init time just in case'." This patchset aims to optimize the list lru memory consumption from different aspects. I had done a easy test to show the optimization. I create 10k memory cgroups and mount 10k filesystems in the systems. We use free command to show how many memory does the systems comsumes after this operation (There are 2 numa nodes in the system). +-----------------------+------------------------+ | condition | memory consumption | +-----------------------+------------------------+ | without this patchset | 24464 MB | +-----------------------+------------------------+ | after patch 1 | 21957 MB | <--------+ +-----------------------+------------------------+ | | after patch 10 | 6895 MB | | +-----------------------+------------------------+ | | after patch 12 | 4367 MB | | +-----------------------+------------------------+ | | The more the number of nodes, the more obvious the effect---+ BTW, there was a recent discussion [2] on the same issue. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20210428094949.43579-1-songmuchun@bytedance.com/ [2] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20210405054848.GA1077931@in.ibm.com/ This series not only optimizes the memory usage of list_lru but also simplifies the code. This patch (of 16): The current scheme of maintaining per-node per-memcg lru lists looks like: struct list_lru { struct list_lru_node *node; (for each node) struct list_lru_memcg *memcg_lrus; struct list_lru_one *lru[]; (for each memcg) } By effectively transposing the two-dimension array of list_lru_one's structures (per-node per-memcg => per-memcg per-node) it's possible to save some memory and simplify alloc/dealloc paths. The new scheme looks like: struct list_lru { struct list_lru_memcg *mlrus; struct list_lru_per_memcg *mlru[]; (for each memcg) struct list_lru_one node[0]; (for each node) } Memory savings are coming from not only 'struct rcu_head' but also some pointer arrays used to store the pointer to 'struct list_lru_one'. The array is per node and its size is 8 (a pointer) * num_memcgs. So the total size of the arrays is 8 * num_nodes * memcg_nr_cache_ids. After this patch, the size becomes 8 * memcg_nr_cache_ids. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220228122126.37293-1-songmuchun@bytedance.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220228122126.37293-2-songmuchun@bytedance.com Signed-off-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com> Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> Cc: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com> Cc: Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com> Cc: Alex Shi <alexs@kernel.org> Cc: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com> Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> Cc: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com> Cc: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com> Cc: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org> Cc: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org> Cc: Kari Argillander <kari.argillander@gmail.com> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com> Cc: Xiongchun Duan <duanxiongchun@bytedance.com> Cc: Fam Zheng <fam.zheng@bytedance.com> Cc: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev> Cc: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2022-03-22 21:40:53 +00:00
list_lru_from_memcg_idx(struct list_lru *lru, int nid, int idx)
list_lru: introduce per-memcg lists There are several FS shrinkers, including super_block::s_shrink, that keep reclaimable objects in the list_lru structure. Hence to turn them to memcg-aware shrinkers, it is enough to make list_lru per-memcg. This patch does the trick. It adds an array of lru lists to the list_lru_node structure (per-node part of the list_lru), one for each kmem-active memcg, and dispatches every item addition or removal to the list corresponding to the memcg which the item is accounted to. So now the list_lru structure is not just per node, but per node and per memcg. Not all list_lrus need this feature, so this patch also adds a new method, list_lru_init_memcg, which initializes a list_lru as memcg aware. Otherwise (i.e. if initialized with old list_lru_init), the list_lru won't have per memcg lists. Just like per memcg caches arrays, the arrays of per-memcg lists are indexed by memcg_cache_id, so we must grow them whenever memcg_nr_cache_ids is increased. So we introduce a callback, memcg_update_all_list_lrus, invoked by memcg_alloc_cache_id if the id space is full. The locking is implemented in a manner similar to lruvecs, i.e. we have one lock per node that protects all lists (both global and per cgroup) on the node. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@parallels.com> Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz> Cc: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com> Cc: Glauber Costa <glommer@gmail.com> Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com> Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2015-02-12 22:59:10 +00:00
{
mm: list_lru: transpose the array of per-node per-memcg lru lists Patch series "Optimize list lru memory consumption", v6. In our server, we found a suspected memory leak problem. The kmalloc-32 consumes more than 6GB of memory. Other kmem_caches consume less than 2GB memory. After our in-depth analysis, the memory consumption of kmalloc-32 slab cache is the cause of list_lru_one allocation. crash> p memcg_nr_cache_ids memcg_nr_cache_ids = $2 = 24574 memcg_nr_cache_ids is very large and memory consumption of each list_lru can be calculated with the following formula. num_numa_node * memcg_nr_cache_ids * 32 (kmalloc-32) There are 4 numa nodes in our system, so each list_lru consumes ~3MB. crash> list super_blocks | wc -l 952 Every mount will register 2 list lrus, one is for inode, another is for dentry. There are 952 super_blocks. So the total memory is 952 * 2 * 3 MB (~5.6GB). But now the number of memory cgroups is less than 500. So I guess more than 12286 memory cgroups have been created on this machine (I do not know why there are so many cgroups, it may be a user's bug or the user really want to do that). Because memcg_nr_cache_ids has not been reduced to a suitable value. It leads to waste a lot of memory. If we want to reduce memcg_nr_cache_ids, we have to *reboot* the server. This is not what we want. In order to reduce memcg_nr_cache_ids, I had posted a patchset [1] to do this. But this did not fundamentally solve the problem. We currently allocate scope for every memcg to be able to tracked on every superblock instantiated in the system, regardless of whether that superblock is even accessible to that memcg. These huge memcg counts come from container hosts where memcgs are confined to just a small subset of the total number of superblocks that instantiated at any given point in time. For these systems with huge container counts, list_lru does not need the capability of tracking every memcg on every superblock. What it comes down to is that the list_lru is only needed for a given memcg if that memcg is instatiating and freeing objects on a given list_lru. As Dave said, "Which makes me think we should be moving more towards 'add the memcg to the list_lru at the first insert' model rather than 'instantiate all at memcg init time just in case'." This patchset aims to optimize the list lru memory consumption from different aspects. I had done a easy test to show the optimization. I create 10k memory cgroups and mount 10k filesystems in the systems. We use free command to show how many memory does the systems comsumes after this operation (There are 2 numa nodes in the system). +-----------------------+------------------------+ | condition | memory consumption | +-----------------------+------------------------+ | without this patchset | 24464 MB | +-----------------------+------------------------+ | after patch 1 | 21957 MB | <--------+ +-----------------------+------------------------+ | | after patch 10 | 6895 MB | | +-----------------------+------------------------+ | | after patch 12 | 4367 MB | | +-----------------------+------------------------+ | | The more the number of nodes, the more obvious the effect---+ BTW, there was a recent discussion [2] on the same issue. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20210428094949.43579-1-songmuchun@bytedance.com/ [2] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20210405054848.GA1077931@in.ibm.com/ This series not only optimizes the memory usage of list_lru but also simplifies the code. This patch (of 16): The current scheme of maintaining per-node per-memcg lru lists looks like: struct list_lru { struct list_lru_node *node; (for each node) struct list_lru_memcg *memcg_lrus; struct list_lru_one *lru[]; (for each memcg) } By effectively transposing the two-dimension array of list_lru_one's structures (per-node per-memcg => per-memcg per-node) it's possible to save some memory and simplify alloc/dealloc paths. The new scheme looks like: struct list_lru { struct list_lru_memcg *mlrus; struct list_lru_per_memcg *mlru[]; (for each memcg) struct list_lru_one node[0]; (for each node) } Memory savings are coming from not only 'struct rcu_head' but also some pointer arrays used to store the pointer to 'struct list_lru_one'. The array is per node and its size is 8 (a pointer) * num_memcgs. So the total size of the arrays is 8 * num_nodes * memcg_nr_cache_ids. After this patch, the size becomes 8 * memcg_nr_cache_ids. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220228122126.37293-1-songmuchun@bytedance.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220228122126.37293-2-songmuchun@bytedance.com Signed-off-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com> Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> Cc: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com> Cc: Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com> Cc: Alex Shi <alexs@kernel.org> Cc: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com> Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> Cc: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com> Cc: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com> Cc: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org> Cc: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org> Cc: Kari Argillander <kari.argillander@gmail.com> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com> Cc: Xiongchun Duan <duanxiongchun@bytedance.com> Cc: Fam Zheng <fam.zheng@bytedance.com> Cc: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev> Cc: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2022-03-22 21:40:53 +00:00
return &lru->node[nid].lru;
list_lru: introduce per-memcg lists There are several FS shrinkers, including super_block::s_shrink, that keep reclaimable objects in the list_lru structure. Hence to turn them to memcg-aware shrinkers, it is enough to make list_lru per-memcg. This patch does the trick. It adds an array of lru lists to the list_lru_node structure (per-node part of the list_lru), one for each kmem-active memcg, and dispatches every item addition or removal to the list corresponding to the memcg which the item is accounted to. So now the list_lru structure is not just per node, but per node and per memcg. Not all list_lrus need this feature, so this patch also adds a new method, list_lru_init_memcg, which initializes a list_lru as memcg aware. Otherwise (i.e. if initialized with old list_lru_init), the list_lru won't have per memcg lists. Just like per memcg caches arrays, the arrays of per-memcg lists are indexed by memcg_cache_id, so we must grow them whenever memcg_nr_cache_ids is increased. So we introduce a callback, memcg_update_all_list_lrus, invoked by memcg_alloc_cache_id if the id space is full. The locking is implemented in a manner similar to lruvecs, i.e. we have one lock per node that protects all lists (both global and per cgroup) on the node. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@parallels.com> Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz> Cc: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com> Cc: Glauber Costa <glommer@gmail.com> Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com> Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2015-02-12 22:59:10 +00:00
}
mm/list_lru: simplify reparenting and initial allocation Currently, there is a lot of code for detecting reparent racing using kmemcg_id as the synchronization flag. And an intermediate table is required to record and compare the kmemcg_id. We can simplify this by just checking the cgroup css status, skip if cgroup is being offlined. On the reparenting side, ensure no more allocation is on going and no further allocation will occur by using the XArray lock as barrier. Combined with a O(n^2) top-down walk for the allocation, we get rid of the intermediate table allocation completely. Despite being O(n^2), it should be actually faster because it's not practical to have a very deep cgroup level, and in most cases the parent cgroup should have been allocated already. This also avoided changing kmemcg_id before reparenting, making cgroups have a stable index for list_lru_memcg. After this change it's possible that a dying cgroup will see a NULL value in XArray corresponding to the kmemcg_id, because the kmemcg_id will point to an empty slot. In such case, just fallback to use its parent. As a result the code is simpler, following test also showed a very slight performance gain (12 test runs): prepare() { mkdir /tmp/test-fs modprobe brd rd_nr=1 rd_size=16777216 mkfs.xfs -f /dev/ram0 mount -t xfs /dev/ram0 /tmp/test-fs for i in $(seq 10000); do seq 8000 > "/tmp/test-fs/$i" done mkdir -p /sys/fs/cgroup/system.slice/bench/test/1 echo +memory > /sys/fs/cgroup/system.slice/bench/cgroup.subtree_control echo +memory > /sys/fs/cgroup/system.slice/bench/test/cgroup.subtree_control echo +memory > /sys/fs/cgroup/system.slice/bench/test/1/cgroup.subtree_control echo 768M > /sys/fs/cgroup/system.slice/bench/memory.max } do_test() { read_worker() { mkdir -p "/sys/fs/cgroup/system.slice/bench/test/1/$1" echo $BASHPID > "/sys/fs/cgroup/system.slice/bench/test/1/$1/cgroup.procs" read -r __TMP < "/tmp/test-fs/$1"; } read_in_all() { for i in $(seq 10000); do read_worker "$i" & done; wait } echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches time read_in_all for i in $(seq 1 10000); do rmdir "/sys/fs/cgroup/system.slice/bench/test/1/$i" &>/dev/null done } Before: real 0m3.498s user 0m11.037s sys 0m35.872s real 1m33.860s user 0m11.593s sys 3m1.169s real 1m31.883s user 0m11.265s sys 2m59.198s real 1m32.394s user 0m11.294s sys 3m1.616s real 1m31.017s user 0m11.379s sys 3m1.349s real 1m31.931s user 0m11.295s sys 2m59.863s real 1m32.758s user 0m11.254s sys 2m59.538s real 1m35.198s user 0m11.145s sys 3m1.123s real 1m30.531s user 0m11.393s sys 2m58.089s real 1m31.142s user 0m11.333s sys 3m0.549s After: real 0m3.489s user 0m10.943s sys 0m36.036s real 1m10.893s user 0m11.495s sys 2m38.545s real 1m29.129s user 0m11.382s sys 3m1.601s real 1m29.944s user 0m11.494s sys 3m1.575s real 1m31.208s user 0m11.451s sys 2m59.693s real 1m25.944s user 0m11.327s sys 2m56.394s real 1m28.599s user 0m11.312s sys 3m0.162s real 1m26.746s user 0m11.538s sys 2m55.462s real 1m30.668s user 0m11.475s sys 3m2.075s real 1m29.258s user 0m11.292s sys 3m0.780s Which is slightly faster in real time. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241104175257.60853-5-ryncsn@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Kairui Song <kasong@tencent.com> Cc: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@bytedance.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev> Cc: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com> Cc: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev> Cc: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-11-04 17:52:55 +00:00
static inline struct list_lru_one *
mm/list_lru: split the lock to per-cgroup scope Currently, every list_lru has a per-node lock that protects adding, deletion, isolation, and reparenting of all list_lru_one instances belonging to this list_lru on this node. This lock contention is heavy when multiple cgroups modify the same list_lru. This lock can be split into per-cgroup scope to reduce contention. To achieve this, we need a stable list_lru_one for every cgroup. This commit adds a lock to each list_lru_one and introduced a helper function lock_list_lru_of_memcg, making it possible to pin the list_lru of a memcg. Then reworked the reparenting process. Reparenting will switch the list_lru_one instances one by one. By locking each instance and marking it dead using the nr_items counter, reparenting ensures that all items in the corresponding cgroup (on-list or not, because items have a stable cgroup, see below) will see the list_lru_one switch synchronously. Objcg reparent is also moved after list_lru reparent so items will have a stable mem cgroup until all list_lru_one instances are drained. The only caller that doesn't work the *_obj interfaces are direct calls to list_lru_{add,del}. But it's only used by zswap and that's also based on objcg, so it's fine. This also changes the bahaviour of the isolation function when LRU_RETRY or LRU_REMOVED_RETRY is returned, because now releasing the lock could unblock reparenting and free the list_lru_one, isolation function will have to return withoug re-lock the lru. prepare() { mkdir /tmp/test-fs modprobe brd rd_nr=1 rd_size=33554432 mkfs.xfs -f /dev/ram0 mount -t xfs /dev/ram0 /tmp/test-fs for i in $(seq 1 512); do mkdir "/tmp/test-fs/$i" for j in $(seq 1 10240); do echo TEST-CONTENT > "/tmp/test-fs/$i/$j" done & done; wait } do_test() { read_worker() { sleep 1 tar -cv "$1" &>/dev/null } read_in_all() { cd "/tmp/test-fs" && ls for i in $(seq 1 512); do (exec sh -c 'echo "$PPID"') > "/sys/fs/cgroup/benchmark/$i/cgroup.procs" read_worker "$i" & done; wait } for i in $(seq 1 512); do mkdir -p "/sys/fs/cgroup/benchmark/$i" done echo +memory > /sys/fs/cgroup/benchmark/cgroup.subtree_control echo 512M > /sys/fs/cgroup/benchmark/memory.max echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches time read_in_all } Above script simulates compression of small files in multiple cgroups with memory pressure. Run prepare() then do_test for 6 times: Before: real 0m7.762s user 0m11.340s sys 3m11.224s real 0m8.123s user 0m11.548s sys 3m2.549s real 0m7.736s user 0m11.515s sys 3m11.171s real 0m8.539s user 0m11.508s sys 3m7.618s real 0m7.928s user 0m11.349s sys 3m13.063s real 0m8.105s user 0m11.128s sys 3m14.313s After this commit (about ~15% faster): real 0m6.953s user 0m11.327s sys 2m42.912s real 0m7.453s user 0m11.343s sys 2m51.942s real 0m6.916s user 0m11.269s sys 2m43.957s real 0m6.894s user 0m11.528s sys 2m45.346s real 0m6.911s user 0m11.095s sys 2m43.168s real 0m6.773s user 0m11.518s sys 2m40.774s Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241104175257.60853-6-ryncsn@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Kairui Song <kasong@tencent.com> Cc: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@bytedance.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev> Cc: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com> Cc: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev> Cc: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-11-04 17:52:56 +00:00
lock_list_lru_of_memcg(struct list_lru *lru, int nid, struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
bool irq, bool skip_empty)
mm/list_lru: simplify reparenting and initial allocation Currently, there is a lot of code for detecting reparent racing using kmemcg_id as the synchronization flag. And an intermediate table is required to record and compare the kmemcg_id. We can simplify this by just checking the cgroup css status, skip if cgroup is being offlined. On the reparenting side, ensure no more allocation is on going and no further allocation will occur by using the XArray lock as barrier. Combined with a O(n^2) top-down walk for the allocation, we get rid of the intermediate table allocation completely. Despite being O(n^2), it should be actually faster because it's not practical to have a very deep cgroup level, and in most cases the parent cgroup should have been allocated already. This also avoided changing kmemcg_id before reparenting, making cgroups have a stable index for list_lru_memcg. After this change it's possible that a dying cgroup will see a NULL value in XArray corresponding to the kmemcg_id, because the kmemcg_id will point to an empty slot. In such case, just fallback to use its parent. As a result the code is simpler, following test also showed a very slight performance gain (12 test runs): prepare() { mkdir /tmp/test-fs modprobe brd rd_nr=1 rd_size=16777216 mkfs.xfs -f /dev/ram0 mount -t xfs /dev/ram0 /tmp/test-fs for i in $(seq 10000); do seq 8000 > "/tmp/test-fs/$i" done mkdir -p /sys/fs/cgroup/system.slice/bench/test/1 echo +memory > /sys/fs/cgroup/system.slice/bench/cgroup.subtree_control echo +memory > /sys/fs/cgroup/system.slice/bench/test/cgroup.subtree_control echo +memory > /sys/fs/cgroup/system.slice/bench/test/1/cgroup.subtree_control echo 768M > /sys/fs/cgroup/system.slice/bench/memory.max } do_test() { read_worker() { mkdir -p "/sys/fs/cgroup/system.slice/bench/test/1/$1" echo $BASHPID > "/sys/fs/cgroup/system.slice/bench/test/1/$1/cgroup.procs" read -r __TMP < "/tmp/test-fs/$1"; } read_in_all() { for i in $(seq 10000); do read_worker "$i" & done; wait } echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches time read_in_all for i in $(seq 1 10000); do rmdir "/sys/fs/cgroup/system.slice/bench/test/1/$i" &>/dev/null done } Before: real 0m3.498s user 0m11.037s sys 0m35.872s real 1m33.860s user 0m11.593s sys 3m1.169s real 1m31.883s user 0m11.265s sys 2m59.198s real 1m32.394s user 0m11.294s sys 3m1.616s real 1m31.017s user 0m11.379s sys 3m1.349s real 1m31.931s user 0m11.295s sys 2m59.863s real 1m32.758s user 0m11.254s sys 2m59.538s real 1m35.198s user 0m11.145s sys 3m1.123s real 1m30.531s user 0m11.393s sys 2m58.089s real 1m31.142s user 0m11.333s sys 3m0.549s After: real 0m3.489s user 0m10.943s sys 0m36.036s real 1m10.893s user 0m11.495s sys 2m38.545s real 1m29.129s user 0m11.382s sys 3m1.601s real 1m29.944s user 0m11.494s sys 3m1.575s real 1m31.208s user 0m11.451s sys 2m59.693s real 1m25.944s user 0m11.327s sys 2m56.394s real 1m28.599s user 0m11.312s sys 3m0.162s real 1m26.746s user 0m11.538s sys 2m55.462s real 1m30.668s user 0m11.475s sys 3m2.075s real 1m29.258s user 0m11.292s sys 3m0.780s Which is slightly faster in real time. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241104175257.60853-5-ryncsn@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Kairui Song <kasong@tencent.com> Cc: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@bytedance.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev> Cc: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com> Cc: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev> Cc: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-11-04 17:52:55 +00:00
{
mm/list_lru: split the lock to per-cgroup scope Currently, every list_lru has a per-node lock that protects adding, deletion, isolation, and reparenting of all list_lru_one instances belonging to this list_lru on this node. This lock contention is heavy when multiple cgroups modify the same list_lru. This lock can be split into per-cgroup scope to reduce contention. To achieve this, we need a stable list_lru_one for every cgroup. This commit adds a lock to each list_lru_one and introduced a helper function lock_list_lru_of_memcg, making it possible to pin the list_lru of a memcg. Then reworked the reparenting process. Reparenting will switch the list_lru_one instances one by one. By locking each instance and marking it dead using the nr_items counter, reparenting ensures that all items in the corresponding cgroup (on-list or not, because items have a stable cgroup, see below) will see the list_lru_one switch synchronously. Objcg reparent is also moved after list_lru reparent so items will have a stable mem cgroup until all list_lru_one instances are drained. The only caller that doesn't work the *_obj interfaces are direct calls to list_lru_{add,del}. But it's only used by zswap and that's also based on objcg, so it's fine. This also changes the bahaviour of the isolation function when LRU_RETRY or LRU_REMOVED_RETRY is returned, because now releasing the lock could unblock reparenting and free the list_lru_one, isolation function will have to return withoug re-lock the lru. prepare() { mkdir /tmp/test-fs modprobe brd rd_nr=1 rd_size=33554432 mkfs.xfs -f /dev/ram0 mount -t xfs /dev/ram0 /tmp/test-fs for i in $(seq 1 512); do mkdir "/tmp/test-fs/$i" for j in $(seq 1 10240); do echo TEST-CONTENT > "/tmp/test-fs/$i/$j" done & done; wait } do_test() { read_worker() { sleep 1 tar -cv "$1" &>/dev/null } read_in_all() { cd "/tmp/test-fs" && ls for i in $(seq 1 512); do (exec sh -c 'echo "$PPID"') > "/sys/fs/cgroup/benchmark/$i/cgroup.procs" read_worker "$i" & done; wait } for i in $(seq 1 512); do mkdir -p "/sys/fs/cgroup/benchmark/$i" done echo +memory > /sys/fs/cgroup/benchmark/cgroup.subtree_control echo 512M > /sys/fs/cgroup/benchmark/memory.max echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches time read_in_all } Above script simulates compression of small files in multiple cgroups with memory pressure. Run prepare() then do_test for 6 times: Before: real 0m7.762s user 0m11.340s sys 3m11.224s real 0m8.123s user 0m11.548s sys 3m2.549s real 0m7.736s user 0m11.515s sys 3m11.171s real 0m8.539s user 0m11.508s sys 3m7.618s real 0m7.928s user 0m11.349s sys 3m13.063s real 0m8.105s user 0m11.128s sys 3m14.313s After this commit (about ~15% faster): real 0m6.953s user 0m11.327s sys 2m42.912s real 0m7.453s user 0m11.343s sys 2m51.942s real 0m6.916s user 0m11.269s sys 2m43.957s real 0m6.894s user 0m11.528s sys 2m45.346s real 0m6.911s user 0m11.095s sys 2m43.168s real 0m6.773s user 0m11.518s sys 2m40.774s Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241104175257.60853-6-ryncsn@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Kairui Song <kasong@tencent.com> Cc: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@bytedance.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev> Cc: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com> Cc: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev> Cc: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-11-04 17:52:56 +00:00
struct list_lru_one *l = &lru->node[nid].lru;
if (irq)
spin_lock_irq(&l->lock);
else
spin_lock(&l->lock);
return l;
}
static inline void unlock_list_lru(struct list_lru_one *l, bool irq_off)
{
if (irq_off)
spin_unlock_irq(&l->lock);
else
spin_unlock(&l->lock);
mm/list_lru: simplify reparenting and initial allocation Currently, there is a lot of code for detecting reparent racing using kmemcg_id as the synchronization flag. And an intermediate table is required to record and compare the kmemcg_id. We can simplify this by just checking the cgroup css status, skip if cgroup is being offlined. On the reparenting side, ensure no more allocation is on going and no further allocation will occur by using the XArray lock as barrier. Combined with a O(n^2) top-down walk for the allocation, we get rid of the intermediate table allocation completely. Despite being O(n^2), it should be actually faster because it's not practical to have a very deep cgroup level, and in most cases the parent cgroup should have been allocated already. This also avoided changing kmemcg_id before reparenting, making cgroups have a stable index for list_lru_memcg. After this change it's possible that a dying cgroup will see a NULL value in XArray corresponding to the kmemcg_id, because the kmemcg_id will point to an empty slot. In such case, just fallback to use its parent. As a result the code is simpler, following test also showed a very slight performance gain (12 test runs): prepare() { mkdir /tmp/test-fs modprobe brd rd_nr=1 rd_size=16777216 mkfs.xfs -f /dev/ram0 mount -t xfs /dev/ram0 /tmp/test-fs for i in $(seq 10000); do seq 8000 > "/tmp/test-fs/$i" done mkdir -p /sys/fs/cgroup/system.slice/bench/test/1 echo +memory > /sys/fs/cgroup/system.slice/bench/cgroup.subtree_control echo +memory > /sys/fs/cgroup/system.slice/bench/test/cgroup.subtree_control echo +memory > /sys/fs/cgroup/system.slice/bench/test/1/cgroup.subtree_control echo 768M > /sys/fs/cgroup/system.slice/bench/memory.max } do_test() { read_worker() { mkdir -p "/sys/fs/cgroup/system.slice/bench/test/1/$1" echo $BASHPID > "/sys/fs/cgroup/system.slice/bench/test/1/$1/cgroup.procs" read -r __TMP < "/tmp/test-fs/$1"; } read_in_all() { for i in $(seq 10000); do read_worker "$i" & done; wait } echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches time read_in_all for i in $(seq 1 10000); do rmdir "/sys/fs/cgroup/system.slice/bench/test/1/$i" &>/dev/null done } Before: real 0m3.498s user 0m11.037s sys 0m35.872s real 1m33.860s user 0m11.593s sys 3m1.169s real 1m31.883s user 0m11.265s sys 2m59.198s real 1m32.394s user 0m11.294s sys 3m1.616s real 1m31.017s user 0m11.379s sys 3m1.349s real 1m31.931s user 0m11.295s sys 2m59.863s real 1m32.758s user 0m11.254s sys 2m59.538s real 1m35.198s user 0m11.145s sys 3m1.123s real 1m30.531s user 0m11.393s sys 2m58.089s real 1m31.142s user 0m11.333s sys 3m0.549s After: real 0m3.489s user 0m10.943s sys 0m36.036s real 1m10.893s user 0m11.495s sys 2m38.545s real 1m29.129s user 0m11.382s sys 3m1.601s real 1m29.944s user 0m11.494s sys 3m1.575s real 1m31.208s user 0m11.451s sys 2m59.693s real 1m25.944s user 0m11.327s sys 2m56.394s real 1m28.599s user 0m11.312s sys 3m0.162s real 1m26.746s user 0m11.538s sys 2m55.462s real 1m30.668s user 0m11.475s sys 3m2.075s real 1m29.258s user 0m11.292s sys 3m0.780s Which is slightly faster in real time. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241104175257.60853-5-ryncsn@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Kairui Song <kasong@tencent.com> Cc: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@bytedance.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev> Cc: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com> Cc: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev> Cc: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-11-04 17:52:55 +00:00
}
#endif /* CONFIG_MEMCG */
list_lru: introduce per-memcg lists There are several FS shrinkers, including super_block::s_shrink, that keep reclaimable objects in the list_lru structure. Hence to turn them to memcg-aware shrinkers, it is enough to make list_lru per-memcg. This patch does the trick. It adds an array of lru lists to the list_lru_node structure (per-node part of the list_lru), one for each kmem-active memcg, and dispatches every item addition or removal to the list corresponding to the memcg which the item is accounted to. So now the list_lru structure is not just per node, but per node and per memcg. Not all list_lrus need this feature, so this patch also adds a new method, list_lru_init_memcg, which initializes a list_lru as memcg aware. Otherwise (i.e. if initialized with old list_lru_init), the list_lru won't have per memcg lists. Just like per memcg caches arrays, the arrays of per-memcg lists are indexed by memcg_cache_id, so we must grow them whenever memcg_nr_cache_ids is increased. So we introduce a callback, memcg_update_all_list_lrus, invoked by memcg_alloc_cache_id if the id space is full. The locking is implemented in a manner similar to lruvecs, i.e. we have one lock per node that protects all lists (both global and per cgroup) on the node. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@parallels.com> Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz> Cc: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com> Cc: Glauber Costa <glommer@gmail.com> Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com> Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2015-02-12 22:59:10 +00:00
/* The caller must ensure the memcg lifetime. */
list_lru: allow explicit memcg and NUMA node selection Patch series "workload-specific and memory pressure-driven zswap writeback", v8. There are currently several issues with zswap writeback: 1. There is only a single global LRU for zswap, making it impossible to perform worload-specific shrinking - an memcg under memory pressure cannot determine which pages in the pool it owns, and often ends up writing pages from other memcgs. This issue has been previously observed in practice and mitigated by simply disabling memcg-initiated shrinking: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230530232435.3097106-1-nphamcs@gmail.com/T/#u But this solution leaves a lot to be desired, as we still do not have an avenue for an memcg to free up its own memory locked up in the zswap pool. 2. We only shrink the zswap pool when the user-defined limit is hit. This means that if we set the limit too high, cold data that are unlikely to be used again will reside in the pool, wasting precious memory. It is hard to predict how much zswap space will be needed ahead of time, as this depends on the workload (specifically, on factors such as memory access patterns and compressibility of the memory pages). This patch series solves these issues by separating the global zswap LRU into per-memcg and per-NUMA LRUs, and performs workload-specific (i.e memcg- and NUMA-aware) zswap writeback under memory pressure. The new shrinker does not have any parameter that must be tuned by the user, and can be opted in or out on a per-memcg basis. As a proof of concept, we ran the following synthetic benchmark: build the linux kernel in a memory-limited cgroup, and allocate some cold data in tmpfs to see if the shrinker could write them out and improved the overall performance. Depending on the amount of cold data generated, we observe from 14% to 35% reduction in kernel CPU time used in the kernel builds. This patch (of 6): The interface of list_lru is based on the assumption that the list node and the data it represents belong to the same allocated on the correct node/memcg. While this assumption is valid for existing slab objects LRU such as dentries and inodes, it is undocumented, and rather inflexible for certain potential list_lru users (such as the upcoming zswap shrinker and the THP shrinker). It has caused us a lot of issues during our development. This patch changes list_lru interface so that the caller must explicitly specify numa node and memcg when adding and removing objects. The old list_lru_add() and list_lru_del() are renamed to list_lru_add_obj() and list_lru_del_obj(), respectively. It also extends the list_lru API with a new function, list_lru_putback, which undoes a previous list_lru_isolate call. Unlike list_lru_add, it does not increment the LRU node count (as list_lru_isolate does not decrement the node count). list_lru_putback also allows for explicit memcg and NUMA node selection. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20231130194023.4102148-1-nphamcs@gmail.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20231130194023.4102148-2-nphamcs@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Nhat Pham <nphamcs@gmail.com> Suggested-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Tested-by: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com> Cc: Chris Li <chrisl@kernel.org> Cc: Dan Streetman <ddstreet@ieee.org> Cc: Domenico Cerasuolo <cerasuolodomenico@gmail.com> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev> Cc: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev> Cc: Seth Jennings <sjenning@redhat.com> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com> Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org> Cc: Vitaly Wool <vitaly.wool@konsulko.com> Cc: Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2023-11-30 19:40:18 +00:00
bool list_lru_add(struct list_lru *lru, struct list_head *item, int nid,
mm/list_lru: split the lock to per-cgroup scope Currently, every list_lru has a per-node lock that protects adding, deletion, isolation, and reparenting of all list_lru_one instances belonging to this list_lru on this node. This lock contention is heavy when multiple cgroups modify the same list_lru. This lock can be split into per-cgroup scope to reduce contention. To achieve this, we need a stable list_lru_one for every cgroup. This commit adds a lock to each list_lru_one and introduced a helper function lock_list_lru_of_memcg, making it possible to pin the list_lru of a memcg. Then reworked the reparenting process. Reparenting will switch the list_lru_one instances one by one. By locking each instance and marking it dead using the nr_items counter, reparenting ensures that all items in the corresponding cgroup (on-list or not, because items have a stable cgroup, see below) will see the list_lru_one switch synchronously. Objcg reparent is also moved after list_lru reparent so items will have a stable mem cgroup until all list_lru_one instances are drained. The only caller that doesn't work the *_obj interfaces are direct calls to list_lru_{add,del}. But it's only used by zswap and that's also based on objcg, so it's fine. This also changes the bahaviour of the isolation function when LRU_RETRY or LRU_REMOVED_RETRY is returned, because now releasing the lock could unblock reparenting and free the list_lru_one, isolation function will have to return withoug re-lock the lru. prepare() { mkdir /tmp/test-fs modprobe brd rd_nr=1 rd_size=33554432 mkfs.xfs -f /dev/ram0 mount -t xfs /dev/ram0 /tmp/test-fs for i in $(seq 1 512); do mkdir "/tmp/test-fs/$i" for j in $(seq 1 10240); do echo TEST-CONTENT > "/tmp/test-fs/$i/$j" done & done; wait } do_test() { read_worker() { sleep 1 tar -cv "$1" &>/dev/null } read_in_all() { cd "/tmp/test-fs" && ls for i in $(seq 1 512); do (exec sh -c 'echo "$PPID"') > "/sys/fs/cgroup/benchmark/$i/cgroup.procs" read_worker "$i" & done; wait } for i in $(seq 1 512); do mkdir -p "/sys/fs/cgroup/benchmark/$i" done echo +memory > /sys/fs/cgroup/benchmark/cgroup.subtree_control echo 512M > /sys/fs/cgroup/benchmark/memory.max echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches time read_in_all } Above script simulates compression of small files in multiple cgroups with memory pressure. Run prepare() then do_test for 6 times: Before: real 0m7.762s user 0m11.340s sys 3m11.224s real 0m8.123s user 0m11.548s sys 3m2.549s real 0m7.736s user 0m11.515s sys 3m11.171s real 0m8.539s user 0m11.508s sys 3m7.618s real 0m7.928s user 0m11.349s sys 3m13.063s real 0m8.105s user 0m11.128s sys 3m14.313s After this commit (about ~15% faster): real 0m6.953s user 0m11.327s sys 2m42.912s real 0m7.453s user 0m11.343s sys 2m51.942s real 0m6.916s user 0m11.269s sys 2m43.957s real 0m6.894s user 0m11.528s sys 2m45.346s real 0m6.911s user 0m11.095s sys 2m43.168s real 0m6.773s user 0m11.518s sys 2m40.774s Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241104175257.60853-6-ryncsn@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Kairui Song <kasong@tencent.com> Cc: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@bytedance.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev> Cc: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com> Cc: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev> Cc: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-11-04 17:52:56 +00:00
struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
list: add a new LRU list type Several subsystems use the same construct for LRU lists - a list head, a spin lock and and item count. They also use exactly the same code for adding and removing items from the LRU. Create a generic type for these LRU lists. This is the beginning of generic, node aware LRUs for shrinkers to work with. [glommer@openvz.org: enum defined constants for lru. Suggested by gthelen, don't relock over retry] Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <glommer@openvz.org> Reviewed-by: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com> Acked-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com> Cc: Arve Hjønnevåg <arve@android.com> Cc: Carlos Maiolino <cmaiolino@redhat.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com> Cc: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com> Cc: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Cc: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com> Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org> Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> Cc: Kent Overstreet <koverstreet@google.com> Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Cc: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com> Cc: Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@vmware.com> Cc: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2013-08-28 00:17:58 +00:00
{
list_lru: per-node list infrastructure Now that we have an LRU list API, we can start to enhance the implementation. This splits the single LRU list into per-node lists and locks to enhance scalability. Items are placed on lists according to the node the memory belongs to. To make scanning the lists efficient, also track whether the per-node lists have entries in them in a active nodemask. Note: We use a fixed-size array for the node LRU, this struct can be very big if MAX_NUMNODES is big. If this becomes a problem this is fixable by turning this into a pointer and dynamically allocating this to nr_node_ids. This quantity is firwmare-provided, and still would provide room for all nodes at the cost of a pointer lookup and an extra allocation. Because that allocation will most likely come from a may very well fail. [glommer@openvz.org: fix warnings, added note about node lru] Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <glommer@openvz.org> Reviewed-by: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com> Acked-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com> Cc: Arve Hjønnevåg <arve@android.com> Cc: Carlos Maiolino <cmaiolino@redhat.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com> Cc: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com> Cc: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Cc: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com> Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org> Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> Cc: Kent Overstreet <koverstreet@google.com> Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Cc: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com> Cc: Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@vmware.com> Cc: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2013-08-28 00:18:00 +00:00
struct list_lru_node *nlru = &lru->node[nid];
list_lru: introduce per-memcg lists There are several FS shrinkers, including super_block::s_shrink, that keep reclaimable objects in the list_lru structure. Hence to turn them to memcg-aware shrinkers, it is enough to make list_lru per-memcg. This patch does the trick. It adds an array of lru lists to the list_lru_node structure (per-node part of the list_lru), one for each kmem-active memcg, and dispatches every item addition or removal to the list corresponding to the memcg which the item is accounted to. So now the list_lru structure is not just per node, but per node and per memcg. Not all list_lrus need this feature, so this patch also adds a new method, list_lru_init_memcg, which initializes a list_lru as memcg aware. Otherwise (i.e. if initialized with old list_lru_init), the list_lru won't have per memcg lists. Just like per memcg caches arrays, the arrays of per-memcg lists are indexed by memcg_cache_id, so we must grow them whenever memcg_nr_cache_ids is increased. So we introduce a callback, memcg_update_all_list_lrus, invoked by memcg_alloc_cache_id if the id space is full. The locking is implemented in a manner similar to lruvecs, i.e. we have one lock per node that protects all lists (both global and per cgroup) on the node. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@parallels.com> Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz> Cc: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com> Cc: Glauber Costa <glommer@gmail.com> Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com> Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2015-02-12 22:59:10 +00:00
struct list_lru_one *l;
list_lru: per-node list infrastructure Now that we have an LRU list API, we can start to enhance the implementation. This splits the single LRU list into per-node lists and locks to enhance scalability. Items are placed on lists according to the node the memory belongs to. To make scanning the lists efficient, also track whether the per-node lists have entries in them in a active nodemask. Note: We use a fixed-size array for the node LRU, this struct can be very big if MAX_NUMNODES is big. If this becomes a problem this is fixable by turning this into a pointer and dynamically allocating this to nr_node_ids. This quantity is firwmare-provided, and still would provide room for all nodes at the cost of a pointer lookup and an extra allocation. Because that allocation will most likely come from a may very well fail. [glommer@openvz.org: fix warnings, added note about node lru] Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <glommer@openvz.org> Reviewed-by: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com> Acked-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com> Cc: Arve Hjønnevåg <arve@android.com> Cc: Carlos Maiolino <cmaiolino@redhat.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com> Cc: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com> Cc: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Cc: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com> Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org> Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> Cc: Kent Overstreet <koverstreet@google.com> Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Cc: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com> Cc: Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@vmware.com> Cc: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2013-08-28 00:18:00 +00:00
mm/list_lru: split the lock to per-cgroup scope Currently, every list_lru has a per-node lock that protects adding, deletion, isolation, and reparenting of all list_lru_one instances belonging to this list_lru on this node. This lock contention is heavy when multiple cgroups modify the same list_lru. This lock can be split into per-cgroup scope to reduce contention. To achieve this, we need a stable list_lru_one for every cgroup. This commit adds a lock to each list_lru_one and introduced a helper function lock_list_lru_of_memcg, making it possible to pin the list_lru of a memcg. Then reworked the reparenting process. Reparenting will switch the list_lru_one instances one by one. By locking each instance and marking it dead using the nr_items counter, reparenting ensures that all items in the corresponding cgroup (on-list or not, because items have a stable cgroup, see below) will see the list_lru_one switch synchronously. Objcg reparent is also moved after list_lru reparent so items will have a stable mem cgroup until all list_lru_one instances are drained. The only caller that doesn't work the *_obj interfaces are direct calls to list_lru_{add,del}. But it's only used by zswap and that's also based on objcg, so it's fine. This also changes the bahaviour of the isolation function when LRU_RETRY or LRU_REMOVED_RETRY is returned, because now releasing the lock could unblock reparenting and free the list_lru_one, isolation function will have to return withoug re-lock the lru. prepare() { mkdir /tmp/test-fs modprobe brd rd_nr=1 rd_size=33554432 mkfs.xfs -f /dev/ram0 mount -t xfs /dev/ram0 /tmp/test-fs for i in $(seq 1 512); do mkdir "/tmp/test-fs/$i" for j in $(seq 1 10240); do echo TEST-CONTENT > "/tmp/test-fs/$i/$j" done & done; wait } do_test() { read_worker() { sleep 1 tar -cv "$1" &>/dev/null } read_in_all() { cd "/tmp/test-fs" && ls for i in $(seq 1 512); do (exec sh -c 'echo "$PPID"') > "/sys/fs/cgroup/benchmark/$i/cgroup.procs" read_worker "$i" & done; wait } for i in $(seq 1 512); do mkdir -p "/sys/fs/cgroup/benchmark/$i" done echo +memory > /sys/fs/cgroup/benchmark/cgroup.subtree_control echo 512M > /sys/fs/cgroup/benchmark/memory.max echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches time read_in_all } Above script simulates compression of small files in multiple cgroups with memory pressure. Run prepare() then do_test for 6 times: Before: real 0m7.762s user 0m11.340s sys 3m11.224s real 0m8.123s user 0m11.548s sys 3m2.549s real 0m7.736s user 0m11.515s sys 3m11.171s real 0m8.539s user 0m11.508s sys 3m7.618s real 0m7.928s user 0m11.349s sys 3m13.063s real 0m8.105s user 0m11.128s sys 3m14.313s After this commit (about ~15% faster): real 0m6.953s user 0m11.327s sys 2m42.912s real 0m7.453s user 0m11.343s sys 2m51.942s real 0m6.916s user 0m11.269s sys 2m43.957s real 0m6.894s user 0m11.528s sys 2m45.346s real 0m6.911s user 0m11.095s sys 2m43.168s real 0m6.773s user 0m11.518s sys 2m40.774s Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241104175257.60853-6-ryncsn@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Kairui Song <kasong@tencent.com> Cc: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@bytedance.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev> Cc: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com> Cc: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev> Cc: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-11-04 17:52:56 +00:00
l = lock_list_lru_of_memcg(lru, nid, memcg, false, false);
if (!l)
return false;
list: add a new LRU list type Several subsystems use the same construct for LRU lists - a list head, a spin lock and and item count. They also use exactly the same code for adding and removing items from the LRU. Create a generic type for these LRU lists. This is the beginning of generic, node aware LRUs for shrinkers to work with. [glommer@openvz.org: enum defined constants for lru. Suggested by gthelen, don't relock over retry] Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <glommer@openvz.org> Reviewed-by: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com> Acked-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com> Cc: Arve Hjønnevåg <arve@android.com> Cc: Carlos Maiolino <cmaiolino@redhat.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com> Cc: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com> Cc: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Cc: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com> Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org> Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> Cc: Kent Overstreet <koverstreet@google.com> Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Cc: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com> Cc: Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@vmware.com> Cc: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2013-08-28 00:17:58 +00:00
if (list_empty(item)) {
list_lru: introduce per-memcg lists There are several FS shrinkers, including super_block::s_shrink, that keep reclaimable objects in the list_lru structure. Hence to turn them to memcg-aware shrinkers, it is enough to make list_lru per-memcg. This patch does the trick. It adds an array of lru lists to the list_lru_node structure (per-node part of the list_lru), one for each kmem-active memcg, and dispatches every item addition or removal to the list corresponding to the memcg which the item is accounted to. So now the list_lru structure is not just per node, but per node and per memcg. Not all list_lrus need this feature, so this patch also adds a new method, list_lru_init_memcg, which initializes a list_lru as memcg aware. Otherwise (i.e. if initialized with old list_lru_init), the list_lru won't have per memcg lists. Just like per memcg caches arrays, the arrays of per-memcg lists are indexed by memcg_cache_id, so we must grow them whenever memcg_nr_cache_ids is increased. So we introduce a callback, memcg_update_all_list_lrus, invoked by memcg_alloc_cache_id if the id space is full. The locking is implemented in a manner similar to lruvecs, i.e. we have one lock per node that protects all lists (both global and per cgroup) on the node. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@parallels.com> Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz> Cc: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com> Cc: Glauber Costa <glommer@gmail.com> Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com> Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2015-02-12 22:59:10 +00:00
list_add_tail(item, &l->list);
mm/list_lru.c: set bit in memcg shrinker bitmap on first list_lru item appearance Introduce set_shrinker_bit() function to set shrinker-related bit in memcg shrinker bitmap, and set the bit after the first item is added and in case of reparenting destroyed memcg's items. This will allow next patch to make shrinkers be called only, in case of they have charged objects at the moment, and to improve shrink_slab() performance. [ktkhai@virtuozzo.com: v9] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/153112557572.4097.17315791419810749985.stgit@localhost.localdomain Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/153063065671.1818.15914674956134687268.stgit@localhost.localdomain Signed-off-by: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@virtuozzo.com> Acked-by: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com> Tested-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com> Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@virtuozzo.com> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Cc: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com> Cc: Li RongQing <lirongqing@baidu.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org> Cc: Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@nexb.com> Cc: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com> Cc: Sahitya Tummala <stummala@codeaurora.org> Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Cc: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2018-08-17 22:48:10 +00:00
/* Set shrinker bit if the first element was added */
if (!l->nr_items++)
list_lru: allow explicit memcg and NUMA node selection Patch series "workload-specific and memory pressure-driven zswap writeback", v8. There are currently several issues with zswap writeback: 1. There is only a single global LRU for zswap, making it impossible to perform worload-specific shrinking - an memcg under memory pressure cannot determine which pages in the pool it owns, and often ends up writing pages from other memcgs. This issue has been previously observed in practice and mitigated by simply disabling memcg-initiated shrinking: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230530232435.3097106-1-nphamcs@gmail.com/T/#u But this solution leaves a lot to be desired, as we still do not have an avenue for an memcg to free up its own memory locked up in the zswap pool. 2. We only shrink the zswap pool when the user-defined limit is hit. This means that if we set the limit too high, cold data that are unlikely to be used again will reside in the pool, wasting precious memory. It is hard to predict how much zswap space will be needed ahead of time, as this depends on the workload (specifically, on factors such as memory access patterns and compressibility of the memory pages). This patch series solves these issues by separating the global zswap LRU into per-memcg and per-NUMA LRUs, and performs workload-specific (i.e memcg- and NUMA-aware) zswap writeback under memory pressure. The new shrinker does not have any parameter that must be tuned by the user, and can be opted in or out on a per-memcg basis. As a proof of concept, we ran the following synthetic benchmark: build the linux kernel in a memory-limited cgroup, and allocate some cold data in tmpfs to see if the shrinker could write them out and improved the overall performance. Depending on the amount of cold data generated, we observe from 14% to 35% reduction in kernel CPU time used in the kernel builds. This patch (of 6): The interface of list_lru is based on the assumption that the list node and the data it represents belong to the same allocated on the correct node/memcg. While this assumption is valid for existing slab objects LRU such as dentries and inodes, it is undocumented, and rather inflexible for certain potential list_lru users (such as the upcoming zswap shrinker and the THP shrinker). It has caused us a lot of issues during our development. This patch changes list_lru interface so that the caller must explicitly specify numa node and memcg when adding and removing objects. The old list_lru_add() and list_lru_del() are renamed to list_lru_add_obj() and list_lru_del_obj(), respectively. It also extends the list_lru API with a new function, list_lru_putback, which undoes a previous list_lru_isolate call. Unlike list_lru_add, it does not increment the LRU node count (as list_lru_isolate does not decrement the node count). list_lru_putback also allows for explicit memcg and NUMA node selection. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20231130194023.4102148-1-nphamcs@gmail.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20231130194023.4102148-2-nphamcs@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Nhat Pham <nphamcs@gmail.com> Suggested-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Tested-by: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com> Cc: Chris Li <chrisl@kernel.org> Cc: Dan Streetman <ddstreet@ieee.org> Cc: Domenico Cerasuolo <cerasuolodomenico@gmail.com> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev> Cc: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev> Cc: Seth Jennings <sjenning@redhat.com> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com> Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org> Cc: Vitaly Wool <vitaly.wool@konsulko.com> Cc: Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2023-11-30 19:40:18 +00:00
set_shrinker_bit(memcg, nid, lru_shrinker_id(lru));
mm/list_lru: split the lock to per-cgroup scope Currently, every list_lru has a per-node lock that protects adding, deletion, isolation, and reparenting of all list_lru_one instances belonging to this list_lru on this node. This lock contention is heavy when multiple cgroups modify the same list_lru. This lock can be split into per-cgroup scope to reduce contention. To achieve this, we need a stable list_lru_one for every cgroup. This commit adds a lock to each list_lru_one and introduced a helper function lock_list_lru_of_memcg, making it possible to pin the list_lru of a memcg. Then reworked the reparenting process. Reparenting will switch the list_lru_one instances one by one. By locking each instance and marking it dead using the nr_items counter, reparenting ensures that all items in the corresponding cgroup (on-list or not, because items have a stable cgroup, see below) will see the list_lru_one switch synchronously. Objcg reparent is also moved after list_lru reparent so items will have a stable mem cgroup until all list_lru_one instances are drained. The only caller that doesn't work the *_obj interfaces are direct calls to list_lru_{add,del}. But it's only used by zswap and that's also based on objcg, so it's fine. This also changes the bahaviour of the isolation function when LRU_RETRY or LRU_REMOVED_RETRY is returned, because now releasing the lock could unblock reparenting and free the list_lru_one, isolation function will have to return withoug re-lock the lru. prepare() { mkdir /tmp/test-fs modprobe brd rd_nr=1 rd_size=33554432 mkfs.xfs -f /dev/ram0 mount -t xfs /dev/ram0 /tmp/test-fs for i in $(seq 1 512); do mkdir "/tmp/test-fs/$i" for j in $(seq 1 10240); do echo TEST-CONTENT > "/tmp/test-fs/$i/$j" done & done; wait } do_test() { read_worker() { sleep 1 tar -cv "$1" &>/dev/null } read_in_all() { cd "/tmp/test-fs" && ls for i in $(seq 1 512); do (exec sh -c 'echo "$PPID"') > "/sys/fs/cgroup/benchmark/$i/cgroup.procs" read_worker "$i" & done; wait } for i in $(seq 1 512); do mkdir -p "/sys/fs/cgroup/benchmark/$i" done echo +memory > /sys/fs/cgroup/benchmark/cgroup.subtree_control echo 512M > /sys/fs/cgroup/benchmark/memory.max echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches time read_in_all } Above script simulates compression of small files in multiple cgroups with memory pressure. Run prepare() then do_test for 6 times: Before: real 0m7.762s user 0m11.340s sys 3m11.224s real 0m8.123s user 0m11.548s sys 3m2.549s real 0m7.736s user 0m11.515s sys 3m11.171s real 0m8.539s user 0m11.508s sys 3m7.618s real 0m7.928s user 0m11.349s sys 3m13.063s real 0m8.105s user 0m11.128s sys 3m14.313s After this commit (about ~15% faster): real 0m6.953s user 0m11.327s sys 2m42.912s real 0m7.453s user 0m11.343s sys 2m51.942s real 0m6.916s user 0m11.269s sys 2m43.957s real 0m6.894s user 0m11.528s sys 2m45.346s real 0m6.911s user 0m11.095s sys 2m43.168s real 0m6.773s user 0m11.518s sys 2m40.774s Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241104175257.60853-6-ryncsn@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Kairui Song <kasong@tencent.com> Cc: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@bytedance.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev> Cc: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com> Cc: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev> Cc: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-11-04 17:52:56 +00:00
unlock_list_lru(l, false);
atomic_long_inc(&nlru->nr_items);
list: add a new LRU list type Several subsystems use the same construct for LRU lists - a list head, a spin lock and and item count. They also use exactly the same code for adding and removing items from the LRU. Create a generic type for these LRU lists. This is the beginning of generic, node aware LRUs for shrinkers to work with. [glommer@openvz.org: enum defined constants for lru. Suggested by gthelen, don't relock over retry] Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <glommer@openvz.org> Reviewed-by: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com> Acked-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com> Cc: Arve Hjønnevåg <arve@android.com> Cc: Carlos Maiolino <cmaiolino@redhat.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com> Cc: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com> Cc: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Cc: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com> Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org> Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> Cc: Kent Overstreet <koverstreet@google.com> Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Cc: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com> Cc: Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@vmware.com> Cc: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2013-08-28 00:17:58 +00:00
return true;
}
mm/list_lru: split the lock to per-cgroup scope Currently, every list_lru has a per-node lock that protects adding, deletion, isolation, and reparenting of all list_lru_one instances belonging to this list_lru on this node. This lock contention is heavy when multiple cgroups modify the same list_lru. This lock can be split into per-cgroup scope to reduce contention. To achieve this, we need a stable list_lru_one for every cgroup. This commit adds a lock to each list_lru_one and introduced a helper function lock_list_lru_of_memcg, making it possible to pin the list_lru of a memcg. Then reworked the reparenting process. Reparenting will switch the list_lru_one instances one by one. By locking each instance and marking it dead using the nr_items counter, reparenting ensures that all items in the corresponding cgroup (on-list or not, because items have a stable cgroup, see below) will see the list_lru_one switch synchronously. Objcg reparent is also moved after list_lru reparent so items will have a stable mem cgroup until all list_lru_one instances are drained. The only caller that doesn't work the *_obj interfaces are direct calls to list_lru_{add,del}. But it's only used by zswap and that's also based on objcg, so it's fine. This also changes the bahaviour of the isolation function when LRU_RETRY or LRU_REMOVED_RETRY is returned, because now releasing the lock could unblock reparenting and free the list_lru_one, isolation function will have to return withoug re-lock the lru. prepare() { mkdir /tmp/test-fs modprobe brd rd_nr=1 rd_size=33554432 mkfs.xfs -f /dev/ram0 mount -t xfs /dev/ram0 /tmp/test-fs for i in $(seq 1 512); do mkdir "/tmp/test-fs/$i" for j in $(seq 1 10240); do echo TEST-CONTENT > "/tmp/test-fs/$i/$j" done & done; wait } do_test() { read_worker() { sleep 1 tar -cv "$1" &>/dev/null } read_in_all() { cd "/tmp/test-fs" && ls for i in $(seq 1 512); do (exec sh -c 'echo "$PPID"') > "/sys/fs/cgroup/benchmark/$i/cgroup.procs" read_worker "$i" & done; wait } for i in $(seq 1 512); do mkdir -p "/sys/fs/cgroup/benchmark/$i" done echo +memory > /sys/fs/cgroup/benchmark/cgroup.subtree_control echo 512M > /sys/fs/cgroup/benchmark/memory.max echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches time read_in_all } Above script simulates compression of small files in multiple cgroups with memory pressure. Run prepare() then do_test for 6 times: Before: real 0m7.762s user 0m11.340s sys 3m11.224s real 0m8.123s user 0m11.548s sys 3m2.549s real 0m7.736s user 0m11.515s sys 3m11.171s real 0m8.539s user 0m11.508s sys 3m7.618s real 0m7.928s user 0m11.349s sys 3m13.063s real 0m8.105s user 0m11.128s sys 3m14.313s After this commit (about ~15% faster): real 0m6.953s user 0m11.327s sys 2m42.912s real 0m7.453s user 0m11.343s sys 2m51.942s real 0m6.916s user 0m11.269s sys 2m43.957s real 0m6.894s user 0m11.528s sys 2m45.346s real 0m6.911s user 0m11.095s sys 2m43.168s real 0m6.773s user 0m11.518s sys 2m40.774s Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241104175257.60853-6-ryncsn@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Kairui Song <kasong@tencent.com> Cc: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@bytedance.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev> Cc: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com> Cc: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev> Cc: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-11-04 17:52:56 +00:00
unlock_list_lru(l, false);
list: add a new LRU list type Several subsystems use the same construct for LRU lists - a list head, a spin lock and and item count. They also use exactly the same code for adding and removing items from the LRU. Create a generic type for these LRU lists. This is the beginning of generic, node aware LRUs for shrinkers to work with. [glommer@openvz.org: enum defined constants for lru. Suggested by gthelen, don't relock over retry] Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <glommer@openvz.org> Reviewed-by: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com> Acked-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com> Cc: Arve Hjønnevåg <arve@android.com> Cc: Carlos Maiolino <cmaiolino@redhat.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com> Cc: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com> Cc: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Cc: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com> Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org> Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> Cc: Kent Overstreet <koverstreet@google.com> Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Cc: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com> Cc: Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@vmware.com> Cc: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2013-08-28 00:17:58 +00:00
return false;
}
list_lru: allow explicit memcg and NUMA node selection Patch series "workload-specific and memory pressure-driven zswap writeback", v8. There are currently several issues with zswap writeback: 1. There is only a single global LRU for zswap, making it impossible to perform worload-specific shrinking - an memcg under memory pressure cannot determine which pages in the pool it owns, and often ends up writing pages from other memcgs. This issue has been previously observed in practice and mitigated by simply disabling memcg-initiated shrinking: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230530232435.3097106-1-nphamcs@gmail.com/T/#u But this solution leaves a lot to be desired, as we still do not have an avenue for an memcg to free up its own memory locked up in the zswap pool. 2. We only shrink the zswap pool when the user-defined limit is hit. This means that if we set the limit too high, cold data that are unlikely to be used again will reside in the pool, wasting precious memory. It is hard to predict how much zswap space will be needed ahead of time, as this depends on the workload (specifically, on factors such as memory access patterns and compressibility of the memory pages). This patch series solves these issues by separating the global zswap LRU into per-memcg and per-NUMA LRUs, and performs workload-specific (i.e memcg- and NUMA-aware) zswap writeback under memory pressure. The new shrinker does not have any parameter that must be tuned by the user, and can be opted in or out on a per-memcg basis. As a proof of concept, we ran the following synthetic benchmark: build the linux kernel in a memory-limited cgroup, and allocate some cold data in tmpfs to see if the shrinker could write them out and improved the overall performance. Depending on the amount of cold data generated, we observe from 14% to 35% reduction in kernel CPU time used in the kernel builds. This patch (of 6): The interface of list_lru is based on the assumption that the list node and the data it represents belong to the same allocated on the correct node/memcg. While this assumption is valid for existing slab objects LRU such as dentries and inodes, it is undocumented, and rather inflexible for certain potential list_lru users (such as the upcoming zswap shrinker and the THP shrinker). It has caused us a lot of issues during our development. This patch changes list_lru interface so that the caller must explicitly specify numa node and memcg when adding and removing objects. The old list_lru_add() and list_lru_del() are renamed to list_lru_add_obj() and list_lru_del_obj(), respectively. It also extends the list_lru API with a new function, list_lru_putback, which undoes a previous list_lru_isolate call. Unlike list_lru_add, it does not increment the LRU node count (as list_lru_isolate does not decrement the node count). list_lru_putback also allows for explicit memcg and NUMA node selection. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20231130194023.4102148-1-nphamcs@gmail.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20231130194023.4102148-2-nphamcs@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Nhat Pham <nphamcs@gmail.com> Suggested-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Tested-by: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com> Cc: Chris Li <chrisl@kernel.org> Cc: Dan Streetman <ddstreet@ieee.org> Cc: Domenico Cerasuolo <cerasuolodomenico@gmail.com> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev> Cc: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev> Cc: Seth Jennings <sjenning@redhat.com> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com> Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org> Cc: Vitaly Wool <vitaly.wool@konsulko.com> Cc: Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2023-11-30 19:40:18 +00:00
bool list_lru_add_obj(struct list_lru *lru, struct list_head *item)
list: add a new LRU list type Several subsystems use the same construct for LRU lists - a list head, a spin lock and and item count. They also use exactly the same code for adding and removing items from the LRU. Create a generic type for these LRU lists. This is the beginning of generic, node aware LRUs for shrinkers to work with. [glommer@openvz.org: enum defined constants for lru. Suggested by gthelen, don't relock over retry] Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <glommer@openvz.org> Reviewed-by: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com> Acked-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com> Cc: Arve Hjønnevåg <arve@android.com> Cc: Carlos Maiolino <cmaiolino@redhat.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com> Cc: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com> Cc: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Cc: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com> Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org> Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> Cc: Kent Overstreet <koverstreet@google.com> Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Cc: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com> Cc: Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@vmware.com> Cc: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2013-08-28 00:17:58 +00:00
{
bool ret;
list_lru: per-node list infrastructure Now that we have an LRU list API, we can start to enhance the implementation. This splits the single LRU list into per-node lists and locks to enhance scalability. Items are placed on lists according to the node the memory belongs to. To make scanning the lists efficient, also track whether the per-node lists have entries in them in a active nodemask. Note: We use a fixed-size array for the node LRU, this struct can be very big if MAX_NUMNODES is big. If this becomes a problem this is fixable by turning this into a pointer and dynamically allocating this to nr_node_ids. This quantity is firwmare-provided, and still would provide room for all nodes at the cost of a pointer lookup and an extra allocation. Because that allocation will most likely come from a may very well fail. [glommer@openvz.org: fix warnings, added note about node lru] Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <glommer@openvz.org> Reviewed-by: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com> Acked-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com> Cc: Arve Hjønnevåg <arve@android.com> Cc: Carlos Maiolino <cmaiolino@redhat.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com> Cc: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com> Cc: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Cc: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com> Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org> Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> Cc: Kent Overstreet <koverstreet@google.com> Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Cc: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com> Cc: Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@vmware.com> Cc: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2013-08-28 00:18:00 +00:00
int nid = page_to_nid(virt_to_page(item));
list_lru: allow explicit memcg and NUMA node selection Patch series "workload-specific and memory pressure-driven zswap writeback", v8. There are currently several issues with zswap writeback: 1. There is only a single global LRU for zswap, making it impossible to perform worload-specific shrinking - an memcg under memory pressure cannot determine which pages in the pool it owns, and often ends up writing pages from other memcgs. This issue has been previously observed in practice and mitigated by simply disabling memcg-initiated shrinking: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230530232435.3097106-1-nphamcs@gmail.com/T/#u But this solution leaves a lot to be desired, as we still do not have an avenue for an memcg to free up its own memory locked up in the zswap pool. 2. We only shrink the zswap pool when the user-defined limit is hit. This means that if we set the limit too high, cold data that are unlikely to be used again will reside in the pool, wasting precious memory. It is hard to predict how much zswap space will be needed ahead of time, as this depends on the workload (specifically, on factors such as memory access patterns and compressibility of the memory pages). This patch series solves these issues by separating the global zswap LRU into per-memcg and per-NUMA LRUs, and performs workload-specific (i.e memcg- and NUMA-aware) zswap writeback under memory pressure. The new shrinker does not have any parameter that must be tuned by the user, and can be opted in or out on a per-memcg basis. As a proof of concept, we ran the following synthetic benchmark: build the linux kernel in a memory-limited cgroup, and allocate some cold data in tmpfs to see if the shrinker could write them out and improved the overall performance. Depending on the amount of cold data generated, we observe from 14% to 35% reduction in kernel CPU time used in the kernel builds. This patch (of 6): The interface of list_lru is based on the assumption that the list node and the data it represents belong to the same allocated on the correct node/memcg. While this assumption is valid for existing slab objects LRU such as dentries and inodes, it is undocumented, and rather inflexible for certain potential list_lru users (such as the upcoming zswap shrinker and the THP shrinker). It has caused us a lot of issues during our development. This patch changes list_lru interface so that the caller must explicitly specify numa node and memcg when adding and removing objects. The old list_lru_add() and list_lru_del() are renamed to list_lru_add_obj() and list_lru_del_obj(), respectively. It also extends the list_lru API with a new function, list_lru_putback, which undoes a previous list_lru_isolate call. Unlike list_lru_add, it does not increment the LRU node count (as list_lru_isolate does not decrement the node count). list_lru_putback also allows for explicit memcg and NUMA node selection. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20231130194023.4102148-1-nphamcs@gmail.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20231130194023.4102148-2-nphamcs@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Nhat Pham <nphamcs@gmail.com> Suggested-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Tested-by: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com> Cc: Chris Li <chrisl@kernel.org> Cc: Dan Streetman <ddstreet@ieee.org> Cc: Domenico Cerasuolo <cerasuolodomenico@gmail.com> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev> Cc: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev> Cc: Seth Jennings <sjenning@redhat.com> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com> Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org> Cc: Vitaly Wool <vitaly.wool@konsulko.com> Cc: Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2023-11-30 19:40:18 +00:00
if (list_lru_memcg_aware(lru)) {
rcu_read_lock();
ret = list_lru_add(lru, item, nid, mem_cgroup_from_slab_obj(item));
rcu_read_unlock();
} else {
ret = list_lru_add(lru, item, nid, NULL);
}
return ret;
list_lru: allow explicit memcg and NUMA node selection Patch series "workload-specific and memory pressure-driven zswap writeback", v8. There are currently several issues with zswap writeback: 1. There is only a single global LRU for zswap, making it impossible to perform worload-specific shrinking - an memcg under memory pressure cannot determine which pages in the pool it owns, and often ends up writing pages from other memcgs. This issue has been previously observed in practice and mitigated by simply disabling memcg-initiated shrinking: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230530232435.3097106-1-nphamcs@gmail.com/T/#u But this solution leaves a lot to be desired, as we still do not have an avenue for an memcg to free up its own memory locked up in the zswap pool. 2. We only shrink the zswap pool when the user-defined limit is hit. This means that if we set the limit too high, cold data that are unlikely to be used again will reside in the pool, wasting precious memory. It is hard to predict how much zswap space will be needed ahead of time, as this depends on the workload (specifically, on factors such as memory access patterns and compressibility of the memory pages). This patch series solves these issues by separating the global zswap LRU into per-memcg and per-NUMA LRUs, and performs workload-specific (i.e memcg- and NUMA-aware) zswap writeback under memory pressure. The new shrinker does not have any parameter that must be tuned by the user, and can be opted in or out on a per-memcg basis. As a proof of concept, we ran the following synthetic benchmark: build the linux kernel in a memory-limited cgroup, and allocate some cold data in tmpfs to see if the shrinker could write them out and improved the overall performance. Depending on the amount of cold data generated, we observe from 14% to 35% reduction in kernel CPU time used in the kernel builds. This patch (of 6): The interface of list_lru is based on the assumption that the list node and the data it represents belong to the same allocated on the correct node/memcg. While this assumption is valid for existing slab objects LRU such as dentries and inodes, it is undocumented, and rather inflexible for certain potential list_lru users (such as the upcoming zswap shrinker and the THP shrinker). It has caused us a lot of issues during our development. This patch changes list_lru interface so that the caller must explicitly specify numa node and memcg when adding and removing objects. The old list_lru_add() and list_lru_del() are renamed to list_lru_add_obj() and list_lru_del_obj(), respectively. It also extends the list_lru API with a new function, list_lru_putback, which undoes a previous list_lru_isolate call. Unlike list_lru_add, it does not increment the LRU node count (as list_lru_isolate does not decrement the node count). list_lru_putback also allows for explicit memcg and NUMA node selection. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20231130194023.4102148-1-nphamcs@gmail.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20231130194023.4102148-2-nphamcs@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Nhat Pham <nphamcs@gmail.com> Suggested-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Tested-by: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com> Cc: Chris Li <chrisl@kernel.org> Cc: Dan Streetman <ddstreet@ieee.org> Cc: Domenico Cerasuolo <cerasuolodomenico@gmail.com> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev> Cc: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev> Cc: Seth Jennings <sjenning@redhat.com> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com> Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org> Cc: Vitaly Wool <vitaly.wool@konsulko.com> Cc: Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2023-11-30 19:40:18 +00:00
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(list_lru_add_obj);
/* The caller must ensure the memcg lifetime. */
list_lru: allow explicit memcg and NUMA node selection Patch series "workload-specific and memory pressure-driven zswap writeback", v8. There are currently several issues with zswap writeback: 1. There is only a single global LRU for zswap, making it impossible to perform worload-specific shrinking - an memcg under memory pressure cannot determine which pages in the pool it owns, and often ends up writing pages from other memcgs. This issue has been previously observed in practice and mitigated by simply disabling memcg-initiated shrinking: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230530232435.3097106-1-nphamcs@gmail.com/T/#u But this solution leaves a lot to be desired, as we still do not have an avenue for an memcg to free up its own memory locked up in the zswap pool. 2. We only shrink the zswap pool when the user-defined limit is hit. This means that if we set the limit too high, cold data that are unlikely to be used again will reside in the pool, wasting precious memory. It is hard to predict how much zswap space will be needed ahead of time, as this depends on the workload (specifically, on factors such as memory access patterns and compressibility of the memory pages). This patch series solves these issues by separating the global zswap LRU into per-memcg and per-NUMA LRUs, and performs workload-specific (i.e memcg- and NUMA-aware) zswap writeback under memory pressure. The new shrinker does not have any parameter that must be tuned by the user, and can be opted in or out on a per-memcg basis. As a proof of concept, we ran the following synthetic benchmark: build the linux kernel in a memory-limited cgroup, and allocate some cold data in tmpfs to see if the shrinker could write them out and improved the overall performance. Depending on the amount of cold data generated, we observe from 14% to 35% reduction in kernel CPU time used in the kernel builds. This patch (of 6): The interface of list_lru is based on the assumption that the list node and the data it represents belong to the same allocated on the correct node/memcg. While this assumption is valid for existing slab objects LRU such as dentries and inodes, it is undocumented, and rather inflexible for certain potential list_lru users (such as the upcoming zswap shrinker and the THP shrinker). It has caused us a lot of issues during our development. This patch changes list_lru interface so that the caller must explicitly specify numa node and memcg when adding and removing objects. The old list_lru_add() and list_lru_del() are renamed to list_lru_add_obj() and list_lru_del_obj(), respectively. It also extends the list_lru API with a new function, list_lru_putback, which undoes a previous list_lru_isolate call. Unlike list_lru_add, it does not increment the LRU node count (as list_lru_isolate does not decrement the node count). list_lru_putback also allows for explicit memcg and NUMA node selection. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20231130194023.4102148-1-nphamcs@gmail.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20231130194023.4102148-2-nphamcs@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Nhat Pham <nphamcs@gmail.com> Suggested-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Tested-by: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com> Cc: Chris Li <chrisl@kernel.org> Cc: Dan Streetman <ddstreet@ieee.org> Cc: Domenico Cerasuolo <cerasuolodomenico@gmail.com> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev> Cc: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev> Cc: Seth Jennings <sjenning@redhat.com> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com> Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org> Cc: Vitaly Wool <vitaly.wool@konsulko.com> Cc: Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2023-11-30 19:40:18 +00:00
bool list_lru_del(struct list_lru *lru, struct list_head *item, int nid,
mm/list_lru: split the lock to per-cgroup scope Currently, every list_lru has a per-node lock that protects adding, deletion, isolation, and reparenting of all list_lru_one instances belonging to this list_lru on this node. This lock contention is heavy when multiple cgroups modify the same list_lru. This lock can be split into per-cgroup scope to reduce contention. To achieve this, we need a stable list_lru_one for every cgroup. This commit adds a lock to each list_lru_one and introduced a helper function lock_list_lru_of_memcg, making it possible to pin the list_lru of a memcg. Then reworked the reparenting process. Reparenting will switch the list_lru_one instances one by one. By locking each instance and marking it dead using the nr_items counter, reparenting ensures that all items in the corresponding cgroup (on-list or not, because items have a stable cgroup, see below) will see the list_lru_one switch synchronously. Objcg reparent is also moved after list_lru reparent so items will have a stable mem cgroup until all list_lru_one instances are drained. The only caller that doesn't work the *_obj interfaces are direct calls to list_lru_{add,del}. But it's only used by zswap and that's also based on objcg, so it's fine. This also changes the bahaviour of the isolation function when LRU_RETRY or LRU_REMOVED_RETRY is returned, because now releasing the lock could unblock reparenting and free the list_lru_one, isolation function will have to return withoug re-lock the lru. prepare() { mkdir /tmp/test-fs modprobe brd rd_nr=1 rd_size=33554432 mkfs.xfs -f /dev/ram0 mount -t xfs /dev/ram0 /tmp/test-fs for i in $(seq 1 512); do mkdir "/tmp/test-fs/$i" for j in $(seq 1 10240); do echo TEST-CONTENT > "/tmp/test-fs/$i/$j" done & done; wait } do_test() { read_worker() { sleep 1 tar -cv "$1" &>/dev/null } read_in_all() { cd "/tmp/test-fs" && ls for i in $(seq 1 512); do (exec sh -c 'echo "$PPID"') > "/sys/fs/cgroup/benchmark/$i/cgroup.procs" read_worker "$i" & done; wait } for i in $(seq 1 512); do mkdir -p "/sys/fs/cgroup/benchmark/$i" done echo +memory > /sys/fs/cgroup/benchmark/cgroup.subtree_control echo 512M > /sys/fs/cgroup/benchmark/memory.max echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches time read_in_all } Above script simulates compression of small files in multiple cgroups with memory pressure. Run prepare() then do_test for 6 times: Before: real 0m7.762s user 0m11.340s sys 3m11.224s real 0m8.123s user 0m11.548s sys 3m2.549s real 0m7.736s user 0m11.515s sys 3m11.171s real 0m8.539s user 0m11.508s sys 3m7.618s real 0m7.928s user 0m11.349s sys 3m13.063s real 0m8.105s user 0m11.128s sys 3m14.313s After this commit (about ~15% faster): real 0m6.953s user 0m11.327s sys 2m42.912s real 0m7.453s user 0m11.343s sys 2m51.942s real 0m6.916s user 0m11.269s sys 2m43.957s real 0m6.894s user 0m11.528s sys 2m45.346s real 0m6.911s user 0m11.095s sys 2m43.168s real 0m6.773s user 0m11.518s sys 2m40.774s Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241104175257.60853-6-ryncsn@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Kairui Song <kasong@tencent.com> Cc: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@bytedance.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev> Cc: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com> Cc: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev> Cc: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-11-04 17:52:56 +00:00
struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
list_lru: allow explicit memcg and NUMA node selection Patch series "workload-specific and memory pressure-driven zswap writeback", v8. There are currently several issues with zswap writeback: 1. There is only a single global LRU for zswap, making it impossible to perform worload-specific shrinking - an memcg under memory pressure cannot determine which pages in the pool it owns, and often ends up writing pages from other memcgs. This issue has been previously observed in practice and mitigated by simply disabling memcg-initiated shrinking: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230530232435.3097106-1-nphamcs@gmail.com/T/#u But this solution leaves a lot to be desired, as we still do not have an avenue for an memcg to free up its own memory locked up in the zswap pool. 2. We only shrink the zswap pool when the user-defined limit is hit. This means that if we set the limit too high, cold data that are unlikely to be used again will reside in the pool, wasting precious memory. It is hard to predict how much zswap space will be needed ahead of time, as this depends on the workload (specifically, on factors such as memory access patterns and compressibility of the memory pages). This patch series solves these issues by separating the global zswap LRU into per-memcg and per-NUMA LRUs, and performs workload-specific (i.e memcg- and NUMA-aware) zswap writeback under memory pressure. The new shrinker does not have any parameter that must be tuned by the user, and can be opted in or out on a per-memcg basis. As a proof of concept, we ran the following synthetic benchmark: build the linux kernel in a memory-limited cgroup, and allocate some cold data in tmpfs to see if the shrinker could write them out and improved the overall performance. Depending on the amount of cold data generated, we observe from 14% to 35% reduction in kernel CPU time used in the kernel builds. This patch (of 6): The interface of list_lru is based on the assumption that the list node and the data it represents belong to the same allocated on the correct node/memcg. While this assumption is valid for existing slab objects LRU such as dentries and inodes, it is undocumented, and rather inflexible for certain potential list_lru users (such as the upcoming zswap shrinker and the THP shrinker). It has caused us a lot of issues during our development. This patch changes list_lru interface so that the caller must explicitly specify numa node and memcg when adding and removing objects. The old list_lru_add() and list_lru_del() are renamed to list_lru_add_obj() and list_lru_del_obj(), respectively. It also extends the list_lru API with a new function, list_lru_putback, which undoes a previous list_lru_isolate call. Unlike list_lru_add, it does not increment the LRU node count (as list_lru_isolate does not decrement the node count). list_lru_putback also allows for explicit memcg and NUMA node selection. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20231130194023.4102148-1-nphamcs@gmail.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20231130194023.4102148-2-nphamcs@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Nhat Pham <nphamcs@gmail.com> Suggested-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Tested-by: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com> Cc: Chris Li <chrisl@kernel.org> Cc: Dan Streetman <ddstreet@ieee.org> Cc: Domenico Cerasuolo <cerasuolodomenico@gmail.com> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev> Cc: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev> Cc: Seth Jennings <sjenning@redhat.com> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com> Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org> Cc: Vitaly Wool <vitaly.wool@konsulko.com> Cc: Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2023-11-30 19:40:18 +00:00
{
list_lru: per-node list infrastructure Now that we have an LRU list API, we can start to enhance the implementation. This splits the single LRU list into per-node lists and locks to enhance scalability. Items are placed on lists according to the node the memory belongs to. To make scanning the lists efficient, also track whether the per-node lists have entries in them in a active nodemask. Note: We use a fixed-size array for the node LRU, this struct can be very big if MAX_NUMNODES is big. If this becomes a problem this is fixable by turning this into a pointer and dynamically allocating this to nr_node_ids. This quantity is firwmare-provided, and still would provide room for all nodes at the cost of a pointer lookup and an extra allocation. Because that allocation will most likely come from a may very well fail. [glommer@openvz.org: fix warnings, added note about node lru] Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <glommer@openvz.org> Reviewed-by: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com> Acked-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com> Cc: Arve Hjønnevåg <arve@android.com> Cc: Carlos Maiolino <cmaiolino@redhat.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com> Cc: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com> Cc: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Cc: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com> Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org> Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> Cc: Kent Overstreet <koverstreet@google.com> Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Cc: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com> Cc: Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@vmware.com> Cc: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2013-08-28 00:18:00 +00:00
struct list_lru_node *nlru = &lru->node[nid];
list_lru: introduce per-memcg lists There are several FS shrinkers, including super_block::s_shrink, that keep reclaimable objects in the list_lru structure. Hence to turn them to memcg-aware shrinkers, it is enough to make list_lru per-memcg. This patch does the trick. It adds an array of lru lists to the list_lru_node structure (per-node part of the list_lru), one for each kmem-active memcg, and dispatches every item addition or removal to the list corresponding to the memcg which the item is accounted to. So now the list_lru structure is not just per node, but per node and per memcg. Not all list_lrus need this feature, so this patch also adds a new method, list_lru_init_memcg, which initializes a list_lru as memcg aware. Otherwise (i.e. if initialized with old list_lru_init), the list_lru won't have per memcg lists. Just like per memcg caches arrays, the arrays of per-memcg lists are indexed by memcg_cache_id, so we must grow them whenever memcg_nr_cache_ids is increased. So we introduce a callback, memcg_update_all_list_lrus, invoked by memcg_alloc_cache_id if the id space is full. The locking is implemented in a manner similar to lruvecs, i.e. we have one lock per node that protects all lists (both global and per cgroup) on the node. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@parallels.com> Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz> Cc: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com> Cc: Glauber Costa <glommer@gmail.com> Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com> Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2015-02-12 22:59:10 +00:00
struct list_lru_one *l;
mm/list_lru: split the lock to per-cgroup scope Currently, every list_lru has a per-node lock that protects adding, deletion, isolation, and reparenting of all list_lru_one instances belonging to this list_lru on this node. This lock contention is heavy when multiple cgroups modify the same list_lru. This lock can be split into per-cgroup scope to reduce contention. To achieve this, we need a stable list_lru_one for every cgroup. This commit adds a lock to each list_lru_one and introduced a helper function lock_list_lru_of_memcg, making it possible to pin the list_lru of a memcg. Then reworked the reparenting process. Reparenting will switch the list_lru_one instances one by one. By locking each instance and marking it dead using the nr_items counter, reparenting ensures that all items in the corresponding cgroup (on-list or not, because items have a stable cgroup, see below) will see the list_lru_one switch synchronously. Objcg reparent is also moved after list_lru reparent so items will have a stable mem cgroup until all list_lru_one instances are drained. The only caller that doesn't work the *_obj interfaces are direct calls to list_lru_{add,del}. But it's only used by zswap and that's also based on objcg, so it's fine. This also changes the bahaviour of the isolation function when LRU_RETRY or LRU_REMOVED_RETRY is returned, because now releasing the lock could unblock reparenting and free the list_lru_one, isolation function will have to return withoug re-lock the lru. prepare() { mkdir /tmp/test-fs modprobe brd rd_nr=1 rd_size=33554432 mkfs.xfs -f /dev/ram0 mount -t xfs /dev/ram0 /tmp/test-fs for i in $(seq 1 512); do mkdir "/tmp/test-fs/$i" for j in $(seq 1 10240); do echo TEST-CONTENT > "/tmp/test-fs/$i/$j" done & done; wait } do_test() { read_worker() { sleep 1 tar -cv "$1" &>/dev/null } read_in_all() { cd "/tmp/test-fs" && ls for i in $(seq 1 512); do (exec sh -c 'echo "$PPID"') > "/sys/fs/cgroup/benchmark/$i/cgroup.procs" read_worker "$i" & done; wait } for i in $(seq 1 512); do mkdir -p "/sys/fs/cgroup/benchmark/$i" done echo +memory > /sys/fs/cgroup/benchmark/cgroup.subtree_control echo 512M > /sys/fs/cgroup/benchmark/memory.max echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches time read_in_all } Above script simulates compression of small files in multiple cgroups with memory pressure. Run prepare() then do_test for 6 times: Before: real 0m7.762s user 0m11.340s sys 3m11.224s real 0m8.123s user 0m11.548s sys 3m2.549s real 0m7.736s user 0m11.515s sys 3m11.171s real 0m8.539s user 0m11.508s sys 3m7.618s real 0m7.928s user 0m11.349s sys 3m13.063s real 0m8.105s user 0m11.128s sys 3m14.313s After this commit (about ~15% faster): real 0m6.953s user 0m11.327s sys 2m42.912s real 0m7.453s user 0m11.343s sys 2m51.942s real 0m6.916s user 0m11.269s sys 2m43.957s real 0m6.894s user 0m11.528s sys 2m45.346s real 0m6.911s user 0m11.095s sys 2m43.168s real 0m6.773s user 0m11.518s sys 2m40.774s Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241104175257.60853-6-ryncsn@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Kairui Song <kasong@tencent.com> Cc: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@bytedance.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev> Cc: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com> Cc: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev> Cc: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-11-04 17:52:56 +00:00
l = lock_list_lru_of_memcg(lru, nid, memcg, false, false);
if (!l)
return false;
list: add a new LRU list type Several subsystems use the same construct for LRU lists - a list head, a spin lock and and item count. They also use exactly the same code for adding and removing items from the LRU. Create a generic type for these LRU lists. This is the beginning of generic, node aware LRUs for shrinkers to work with. [glommer@openvz.org: enum defined constants for lru. Suggested by gthelen, don't relock over retry] Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <glommer@openvz.org> Reviewed-by: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com> Acked-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com> Cc: Arve Hjønnevåg <arve@android.com> Cc: Carlos Maiolino <cmaiolino@redhat.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com> Cc: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com> Cc: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Cc: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com> Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org> Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> Cc: Kent Overstreet <koverstreet@google.com> Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Cc: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com> Cc: Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@vmware.com> Cc: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2013-08-28 00:17:58 +00:00
if (!list_empty(item)) {
list_del_init(item);
list_lru: introduce per-memcg lists There are several FS shrinkers, including super_block::s_shrink, that keep reclaimable objects in the list_lru structure. Hence to turn them to memcg-aware shrinkers, it is enough to make list_lru per-memcg. This patch does the trick. It adds an array of lru lists to the list_lru_node structure (per-node part of the list_lru), one for each kmem-active memcg, and dispatches every item addition or removal to the list corresponding to the memcg which the item is accounted to. So now the list_lru structure is not just per node, but per node and per memcg. Not all list_lrus need this feature, so this patch also adds a new method, list_lru_init_memcg, which initializes a list_lru as memcg aware. Otherwise (i.e. if initialized with old list_lru_init), the list_lru won't have per memcg lists. Just like per memcg caches arrays, the arrays of per-memcg lists are indexed by memcg_cache_id, so we must grow them whenever memcg_nr_cache_ids is increased. So we introduce a callback, memcg_update_all_list_lrus, invoked by memcg_alloc_cache_id if the id space is full. The locking is implemented in a manner similar to lruvecs, i.e. we have one lock per node that protects all lists (both global and per cgroup) on the node. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@parallels.com> Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz> Cc: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com> Cc: Glauber Costa <glommer@gmail.com> Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com> Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2015-02-12 22:59:10 +00:00
l->nr_items--;
mm/list_lru: split the lock to per-cgroup scope Currently, every list_lru has a per-node lock that protects adding, deletion, isolation, and reparenting of all list_lru_one instances belonging to this list_lru on this node. This lock contention is heavy when multiple cgroups modify the same list_lru. This lock can be split into per-cgroup scope to reduce contention. To achieve this, we need a stable list_lru_one for every cgroup. This commit adds a lock to each list_lru_one and introduced a helper function lock_list_lru_of_memcg, making it possible to pin the list_lru of a memcg. Then reworked the reparenting process. Reparenting will switch the list_lru_one instances one by one. By locking each instance and marking it dead using the nr_items counter, reparenting ensures that all items in the corresponding cgroup (on-list or not, because items have a stable cgroup, see below) will see the list_lru_one switch synchronously. Objcg reparent is also moved after list_lru reparent so items will have a stable mem cgroup until all list_lru_one instances are drained. The only caller that doesn't work the *_obj interfaces are direct calls to list_lru_{add,del}. But it's only used by zswap and that's also based on objcg, so it's fine. This also changes the bahaviour of the isolation function when LRU_RETRY or LRU_REMOVED_RETRY is returned, because now releasing the lock could unblock reparenting and free the list_lru_one, isolation function will have to return withoug re-lock the lru. prepare() { mkdir /tmp/test-fs modprobe brd rd_nr=1 rd_size=33554432 mkfs.xfs -f /dev/ram0 mount -t xfs /dev/ram0 /tmp/test-fs for i in $(seq 1 512); do mkdir "/tmp/test-fs/$i" for j in $(seq 1 10240); do echo TEST-CONTENT > "/tmp/test-fs/$i/$j" done & done; wait } do_test() { read_worker() { sleep 1 tar -cv "$1" &>/dev/null } read_in_all() { cd "/tmp/test-fs" && ls for i in $(seq 1 512); do (exec sh -c 'echo "$PPID"') > "/sys/fs/cgroup/benchmark/$i/cgroup.procs" read_worker "$i" & done; wait } for i in $(seq 1 512); do mkdir -p "/sys/fs/cgroup/benchmark/$i" done echo +memory > /sys/fs/cgroup/benchmark/cgroup.subtree_control echo 512M > /sys/fs/cgroup/benchmark/memory.max echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches time read_in_all } Above script simulates compression of small files in multiple cgroups with memory pressure. Run prepare() then do_test for 6 times: Before: real 0m7.762s user 0m11.340s sys 3m11.224s real 0m8.123s user 0m11.548s sys 3m2.549s real 0m7.736s user 0m11.515s sys 3m11.171s real 0m8.539s user 0m11.508s sys 3m7.618s real 0m7.928s user 0m11.349s sys 3m13.063s real 0m8.105s user 0m11.128s sys 3m14.313s After this commit (about ~15% faster): real 0m6.953s user 0m11.327s sys 2m42.912s real 0m7.453s user 0m11.343s sys 2m51.942s real 0m6.916s user 0m11.269s sys 2m43.957s real 0m6.894s user 0m11.528s sys 2m45.346s real 0m6.911s user 0m11.095s sys 2m43.168s real 0m6.773s user 0m11.518s sys 2m40.774s Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241104175257.60853-6-ryncsn@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Kairui Song <kasong@tencent.com> Cc: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@bytedance.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev> Cc: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com> Cc: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev> Cc: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-11-04 17:52:56 +00:00
unlock_list_lru(l, false);
atomic_long_dec(&nlru->nr_items);
list: add a new LRU list type Several subsystems use the same construct for LRU lists - a list head, a spin lock and and item count. They also use exactly the same code for adding and removing items from the LRU. Create a generic type for these LRU lists. This is the beginning of generic, node aware LRUs for shrinkers to work with. [glommer@openvz.org: enum defined constants for lru. Suggested by gthelen, don't relock over retry] Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <glommer@openvz.org> Reviewed-by: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com> Acked-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com> Cc: Arve Hjønnevåg <arve@android.com> Cc: Carlos Maiolino <cmaiolino@redhat.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com> Cc: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com> Cc: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Cc: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com> Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org> Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> Cc: Kent Overstreet <koverstreet@google.com> Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Cc: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com> Cc: Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@vmware.com> Cc: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2013-08-28 00:17:58 +00:00
return true;
}
mm/list_lru: split the lock to per-cgroup scope Currently, every list_lru has a per-node lock that protects adding, deletion, isolation, and reparenting of all list_lru_one instances belonging to this list_lru on this node. This lock contention is heavy when multiple cgroups modify the same list_lru. This lock can be split into per-cgroup scope to reduce contention. To achieve this, we need a stable list_lru_one for every cgroup. This commit adds a lock to each list_lru_one and introduced a helper function lock_list_lru_of_memcg, making it possible to pin the list_lru of a memcg. Then reworked the reparenting process. Reparenting will switch the list_lru_one instances one by one. By locking each instance and marking it dead using the nr_items counter, reparenting ensures that all items in the corresponding cgroup (on-list or not, because items have a stable cgroup, see below) will see the list_lru_one switch synchronously. Objcg reparent is also moved after list_lru reparent so items will have a stable mem cgroup until all list_lru_one instances are drained. The only caller that doesn't work the *_obj interfaces are direct calls to list_lru_{add,del}. But it's only used by zswap and that's also based on objcg, so it's fine. This also changes the bahaviour of the isolation function when LRU_RETRY or LRU_REMOVED_RETRY is returned, because now releasing the lock could unblock reparenting and free the list_lru_one, isolation function will have to return withoug re-lock the lru. prepare() { mkdir /tmp/test-fs modprobe brd rd_nr=1 rd_size=33554432 mkfs.xfs -f /dev/ram0 mount -t xfs /dev/ram0 /tmp/test-fs for i in $(seq 1 512); do mkdir "/tmp/test-fs/$i" for j in $(seq 1 10240); do echo TEST-CONTENT > "/tmp/test-fs/$i/$j" done & done; wait } do_test() { read_worker() { sleep 1 tar -cv "$1" &>/dev/null } read_in_all() { cd "/tmp/test-fs" && ls for i in $(seq 1 512); do (exec sh -c 'echo "$PPID"') > "/sys/fs/cgroup/benchmark/$i/cgroup.procs" read_worker "$i" & done; wait } for i in $(seq 1 512); do mkdir -p "/sys/fs/cgroup/benchmark/$i" done echo +memory > /sys/fs/cgroup/benchmark/cgroup.subtree_control echo 512M > /sys/fs/cgroup/benchmark/memory.max echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches time read_in_all } Above script simulates compression of small files in multiple cgroups with memory pressure. Run prepare() then do_test for 6 times: Before: real 0m7.762s user 0m11.340s sys 3m11.224s real 0m8.123s user 0m11.548s sys 3m2.549s real 0m7.736s user 0m11.515s sys 3m11.171s real 0m8.539s user 0m11.508s sys 3m7.618s real 0m7.928s user 0m11.349s sys 3m13.063s real 0m8.105s user 0m11.128s sys 3m14.313s After this commit (about ~15% faster): real 0m6.953s user 0m11.327s sys 2m42.912s real 0m7.453s user 0m11.343s sys 2m51.942s real 0m6.916s user 0m11.269s sys 2m43.957s real 0m6.894s user 0m11.528s sys 2m45.346s real 0m6.911s user 0m11.095s sys 2m43.168s real 0m6.773s user 0m11.518s sys 2m40.774s Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241104175257.60853-6-ryncsn@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Kairui Song <kasong@tencent.com> Cc: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@bytedance.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev> Cc: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com> Cc: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev> Cc: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-11-04 17:52:56 +00:00
unlock_list_lru(l, false);
list: add a new LRU list type Several subsystems use the same construct for LRU lists - a list head, a spin lock and and item count. They also use exactly the same code for adding and removing items from the LRU. Create a generic type for these LRU lists. This is the beginning of generic, node aware LRUs for shrinkers to work with. [glommer@openvz.org: enum defined constants for lru. Suggested by gthelen, don't relock over retry] Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <glommer@openvz.org> Reviewed-by: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com> Acked-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com> Cc: Arve Hjønnevåg <arve@android.com> Cc: Carlos Maiolino <cmaiolino@redhat.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com> Cc: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com> Cc: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Cc: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com> Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org> Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> Cc: Kent Overstreet <koverstreet@google.com> Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Cc: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com> Cc: Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@vmware.com> Cc: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2013-08-28 00:17:58 +00:00
return false;
}
list_lru: allow explicit memcg and NUMA node selection Patch series "workload-specific and memory pressure-driven zswap writeback", v8. There are currently several issues with zswap writeback: 1. There is only a single global LRU for zswap, making it impossible to perform worload-specific shrinking - an memcg under memory pressure cannot determine which pages in the pool it owns, and often ends up writing pages from other memcgs. This issue has been previously observed in practice and mitigated by simply disabling memcg-initiated shrinking: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230530232435.3097106-1-nphamcs@gmail.com/T/#u But this solution leaves a lot to be desired, as we still do not have an avenue for an memcg to free up its own memory locked up in the zswap pool. 2. We only shrink the zswap pool when the user-defined limit is hit. This means that if we set the limit too high, cold data that are unlikely to be used again will reside in the pool, wasting precious memory. It is hard to predict how much zswap space will be needed ahead of time, as this depends on the workload (specifically, on factors such as memory access patterns and compressibility of the memory pages). This patch series solves these issues by separating the global zswap LRU into per-memcg and per-NUMA LRUs, and performs workload-specific (i.e memcg- and NUMA-aware) zswap writeback under memory pressure. The new shrinker does not have any parameter that must be tuned by the user, and can be opted in or out on a per-memcg basis. As a proof of concept, we ran the following synthetic benchmark: build the linux kernel in a memory-limited cgroup, and allocate some cold data in tmpfs to see if the shrinker could write them out and improved the overall performance. Depending on the amount of cold data generated, we observe from 14% to 35% reduction in kernel CPU time used in the kernel builds. This patch (of 6): The interface of list_lru is based on the assumption that the list node and the data it represents belong to the same allocated on the correct node/memcg. While this assumption is valid for existing slab objects LRU such as dentries and inodes, it is undocumented, and rather inflexible for certain potential list_lru users (such as the upcoming zswap shrinker and the THP shrinker). It has caused us a lot of issues during our development. This patch changes list_lru interface so that the caller must explicitly specify numa node and memcg when adding and removing objects. The old list_lru_add() and list_lru_del() are renamed to list_lru_add_obj() and list_lru_del_obj(), respectively. It also extends the list_lru API with a new function, list_lru_putback, which undoes a previous list_lru_isolate call. Unlike list_lru_add, it does not increment the LRU node count (as list_lru_isolate does not decrement the node count). list_lru_putback also allows for explicit memcg and NUMA node selection. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20231130194023.4102148-1-nphamcs@gmail.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20231130194023.4102148-2-nphamcs@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Nhat Pham <nphamcs@gmail.com> Suggested-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Tested-by: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com> Cc: Chris Li <chrisl@kernel.org> Cc: Dan Streetman <ddstreet@ieee.org> Cc: Domenico Cerasuolo <cerasuolodomenico@gmail.com> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev> Cc: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev> Cc: Seth Jennings <sjenning@redhat.com> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com> Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org> Cc: Vitaly Wool <vitaly.wool@konsulko.com> Cc: Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2023-11-30 19:40:18 +00:00
bool list_lru_del_obj(struct list_lru *lru, struct list_head *item)
{
bool ret;
list_lru: allow explicit memcg and NUMA node selection Patch series "workload-specific and memory pressure-driven zswap writeback", v8. There are currently several issues with zswap writeback: 1. There is only a single global LRU for zswap, making it impossible to perform worload-specific shrinking - an memcg under memory pressure cannot determine which pages in the pool it owns, and often ends up writing pages from other memcgs. This issue has been previously observed in practice and mitigated by simply disabling memcg-initiated shrinking: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230530232435.3097106-1-nphamcs@gmail.com/T/#u But this solution leaves a lot to be desired, as we still do not have an avenue for an memcg to free up its own memory locked up in the zswap pool. 2. We only shrink the zswap pool when the user-defined limit is hit. This means that if we set the limit too high, cold data that are unlikely to be used again will reside in the pool, wasting precious memory. It is hard to predict how much zswap space will be needed ahead of time, as this depends on the workload (specifically, on factors such as memory access patterns and compressibility of the memory pages). This patch series solves these issues by separating the global zswap LRU into per-memcg and per-NUMA LRUs, and performs workload-specific (i.e memcg- and NUMA-aware) zswap writeback under memory pressure. The new shrinker does not have any parameter that must be tuned by the user, and can be opted in or out on a per-memcg basis. As a proof of concept, we ran the following synthetic benchmark: build the linux kernel in a memory-limited cgroup, and allocate some cold data in tmpfs to see if the shrinker could write them out and improved the overall performance. Depending on the amount of cold data generated, we observe from 14% to 35% reduction in kernel CPU time used in the kernel builds. This patch (of 6): The interface of list_lru is based on the assumption that the list node and the data it represents belong to the same allocated on the correct node/memcg. While this assumption is valid for existing slab objects LRU such as dentries and inodes, it is undocumented, and rather inflexible for certain potential list_lru users (such as the upcoming zswap shrinker and the THP shrinker). It has caused us a lot of issues during our development. This patch changes list_lru interface so that the caller must explicitly specify numa node and memcg when adding and removing objects. The old list_lru_add() and list_lru_del() are renamed to list_lru_add_obj() and list_lru_del_obj(), respectively. It also extends the list_lru API with a new function, list_lru_putback, which undoes a previous list_lru_isolate call. Unlike list_lru_add, it does not increment the LRU node count (as list_lru_isolate does not decrement the node count). list_lru_putback also allows for explicit memcg and NUMA node selection. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20231130194023.4102148-1-nphamcs@gmail.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20231130194023.4102148-2-nphamcs@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Nhat Pham <nphamcs@gmail.com> Suggested-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Tested-by: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com> Cc: Chris Li <chrisl@kernel.org> Cc: Dan Streetman <ddstreet@ieee.org> Cc: Domenico Cerasuolo <cerasuolodomenico@gmail.com> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev> Cc: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev> Cc: Seth Jennings <sjenning@redhat.com> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com> Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org> Cc: Vitaly Wool <vitaly.wool@konsulko.com> Cc: Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2023-11-30 19:40:18 +00:00
int nid = page_to_nid(virt_to_page(item));
if (list_lru_memcg_aware(lru)) {
rcu_read_lock();
ret = list_lru_del(lru, item, nid, mem_cgroup_from_slab_obj(item));
rcu_read_unlock();
} else {
ret = list_lru_del(lru, item, nid, NULL);
}
return ret;
list_lru: allow explicit memcg and NUMA node selection Patch series "workload-specific and memory pressure-driven zswap writeback", v8. There are currently several issues with zswap writeback: 1. There is only a single global LRU for zswap, making it impossible to perform worload-specific shrinking - an memcg under memory pressure cannot determine which pages in the pool it owns, and often ends up writing pages from other memcgs. This issue has been previously observed in practice and mitigated by simply disabling memcg-initiated shrinking: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230530232435.3097106-1-nphamcs@gmail.com/T/#u But this solution leaves a lot to be desired, as we still do not have an avenue for an memcg to free up its own memory locked up in the zswap pool. 2. We only shrink the zswap pool when the user-defined limit is hit. This means that if we set the limit too high, cold data that are unlikely to be used again will reside in the pool, wasting precious memory. It is hard to predict how much zswap space will be needed ahead of time, as this depends on the workload (specifically, on factors such as memory access patterns and compressibility of the memory pages). This patch series solves these issues by separating the global zswap LRU into per-memcg and per-NUMA LRUs, and performs workload-specific (i.e memcg- and NUMA-aware) zswap writeback under memory pressure. The new shrinker does not have any parameter that must be tuned by the user, and can be opted in or out on a per-memcg basis. As a proof of concept, we ran the following synthetic benchmark: build the linux kernel in a memory-limited cgroup, and allocate some cold data in tmpfs to see if the shrinker could write them out and improved the overall performance. Depending on the amount of cold data generated, we observe from 14% to 35% reduction in kernel CPU time used in the kernel builds. This patch (of 6): The interface of list_lru is based on the assumption that the list node and the data it represents belong to the same allocated on the correct node/memcg. While this assumption is valid for existing slab objects LRU such as dentries and inodes, it is undocumented, and rather inflexible for certain potential list_lru users (such as the upcoming zswap shrinker and the THP shrinker). It has caused us a lot of issues during our development. This patch changes list_lru interface so that the caller must explicitly specify numa node and memcg when adding and removing objects. The old list_lru_add() and list_lru_del() are renamed to list_lru_add_obj() and list_lru_del_obj(), respectively. It also extends the list_lru API with a new function, list_lru_putback, which undoes a previous list_lru_isolate call. Unlike list_lru_add, it does not increment the LRU node count (as list_lru_isolate does not decrement the node count). list_lru_putback also allows for explicit memcg and NUMA node selection. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20231130194023.4102148-1-nphamcs@gmail.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20231130194023.4102148-2-nphamcs@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Nhat Pham <nphamcs@gmail.com> Suggested-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Tested-by: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com> Cc: Chris Li <chrisl@kernel.org> Cc: Dan Streetman <ddstreet@ieee.org> Cc: Domenico Cerasuolo <cerasuolodomenico@gmail.com> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev> Cc: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev> Cc: Seth Jennings <sjenning@redhat.com> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com> Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org> Cc: Vitaly Wool <vitaly.wool@konsulko.com> Cc: Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2023-11-30 19:40:18 +00:00
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(list_lru_del_obj);
list_lru: add helpers to isolate items Currently, the isolate callback passed to the list_lru_walk family of functions is supposed to just delete an item from the list upon returning LRU_REMOVED or LRU_REMOVED_RETRY, while nr_items counter is fixed by __list_lru_walk_one after the callback returns. Since the callback is allowed to drop the lock after removing an item (it has to return LRU_REMOVED_RETRY then), the nr_items can be less than the actual number of elements on the list even if we check them under the lock. This makes it difficult to move items from one list_lru_one to another, which is required for per-memcg list_lru reparenting - we can't just splice the lists, we have to move entries one by one. This patch therefore introduces helpers that must be used by callback functions to isolate items instead of raw list_del/list_move. These are list_lru_isolate and list_lru_isolate_move. They not only remove the entry from the list, but also fix the nr_items counter, making sure nr_items always reflects the actual number of elements on the list if checked under the appropriate lock. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@parallels.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz> Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com> Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2015-02-12 22:59:35 +00:00
void list_lru_isolate(struct list_lru_one *list, struct list_head *item)
{
list_del_init(item);
list->nr_items--;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(list_lru_isolate);
void list_lru_isolate_move(struct list_lru_one *list, struct list_head *item,
struct list_head *head)
{
list_move(item, head);
list->nr_items--;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(list_lru_isolate_move);
unsigned long list_lru_count_one(struct list_lru *lru,
int nid, struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
list: add a new LRU list type Several subsystems use the same construct for LRU lists - a list head, a spin lock and and item count. They also use exactly the same code for adding and removing items from the LRU. Create a generic type for these LRU lists. This is the beginning of generic, node aware LRUs for shrinkers to work with. [glommer@openvz.org: enum defined constants for lru. Suggested by gthelen, don't relock over retry] Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <glommer@openvz.org> Reviewed-by: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com> Acked-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com> Cc: Arve Hjønnevåg <arve@android.com> Cc: Carlos Maiolino <cmaiolino@redhat.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com> Cc: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com> Cc: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Cc: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com> Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org> Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> Cc: Kent Overstreet <koverstreet@google.com> Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Cc: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com> Cc: Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@vmware.com> Cc: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2013-08-28 00:17:58 +00:00
{
list_lru: introduce per-memcg lists There are several FS shrinkers, including super_block::s_shrink, that keep reclaimable objects in the list_lru structure. Hence to turn them to memcg-aware shrinkers, it is enough to make list_lru per-memcg. This patch does the trick. It adds an array of lru lists to the list_lru_node structure (per-node part of the list_lru), one for each kmem-active memcg, and dispatches every item addition or removal to the list corresponding to the memcg which the item is accounted to. So now the list_lru structure is not just per node, but per node and per memcg. Not all list_lrus need this feature, so this patch also adds a new method, list_lru_init_memcg, which initializes a list_lru as memcg aware. Otherwise (i.e. if initialized with old list_lru_init), the list_lru won't have per memcg lists. Just like per memcg caches arrays, the arrays of per-memcg lists are indexed by memcg_cache_id, so we must grow them whenever memcg_nr_cache_ids is increased. So we introduce a callback, memcg_update_all_list_lrus, invoked by memcg_alloc_cache_id if the id space is full. The locking is implemented in a manner similar to lruvecs, i.e. we have one lock per node that protects all lists (both global and per cgroup) on the node. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@parallels.com> Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz> Cc: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com> Cc: Glauber Costa <glommer@gmail.com> Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com> Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2015-02-12 22:59:10 +00:00
struct list_lru_one *l;
long count;
list_lru: per-node list infrastructure Now that we have an LRU list API, we can start to enhance the implementation. This splits the single LRU list into per-node lists and locks to enhance scalability. Items are placed on lists according to the node the memory belongs to. To make scanning the lists efficient, also track whether the per-node lists have entries in them in a active nodemask. Note: We use a fixed-size array for the node LRU, this struct can be very big if MAX_NUMNODES is big. If this becomes a problem this is fixable by turning this into a pointer and dynamically allocating this to nr_node_ids. This quantity is firwmare-provided, and still would provide room for all nodes at the cost of a pointer lookup and an extra allocation. Because that allocation will most likely come from a may very well fail. [glommer@openvz.org: fix warnings, added note about node lru] Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <glommer@openvz.org> Reviewed-by: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com> Acked-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com> Cc: Arve Hjønnevåg <arve@android.com> Cc: Carlos Maiolino <cmaiolino@redhat.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com> Cc: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com> Cc: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Cc: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com> Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org> Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> Cc: Kent Overstreet <koverstreet@google.com> Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Cc: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com> Cc: Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@vmware.com> Cc: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2013-08-28 00:18:00 +00:00
mm: make counting of list_lru_one::nr_items lockless During the reclaiming slab of a memcg, shrink_slab iterates over all registered shrinkers in the system, and tries to count and consume objects related to the cgroup. In case of memory pressure, this behaves bad: I observe high system time and time spent in list_lru_count_one() for many processes on RHEL7 kernel. This patch makes list_lru_node::memcg_lrus rcu protected, that allows to skip taking spinlock in list_lru_count_one(). Shakeel Butt with the patch observes significant perf graph change. He says: ======================================================================== Setup: running a fork-bomb in a memcg of 200MiB on a 8GiB and 4 vcpu VM and recording the trace with 'perf record -g -a'. The trace without the patch: + 34.19% fb.sh [kernel.kallsyms] [k] queued_spin_lock_slowpath + 30.77% fb.sh [kernel.kallsyms] [k] _raw_spin_lock + 3.53% fb.sh [kernel.kallsyms] [k] list_lru_count_one + 2.26% fb.sh [kernel.kallsyms] [k] super_cache_count + 1.68% fb.sh [kernel.kallsyms] [k] shrink_slab + 0.59% fb.sh [kernel.kallsyms] [k] down_read_trylock + 0.48% fb.sh [kernel.kallsyms] [k] _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore + 0.38% fb.sh [kernel.kallsyms] [k] shrink_node_memcg + 0.32% fb.sh [kernel.kallsyms] [k] queue_work_on + 0.26% fb.sh [kernel.kallsyms] [k] count_shadow_nodes With the patch: + 0.16% swapper [kernel.kallsyms] [k] default_idle + 0.13% oom_reaper [kernel.kallsyms] [k] mutex_spin_on_owner + 0.05% perf [kernel.kallsyms] [k] copy_user_generic_string + 0.05% init.real [kernel.kallsyms] [k] wait_consider_task + 0.05% kworker/0:0 [kernel.kallsyms] [k] finish_task_switch + 0.04% kworker/2:1 [kernel.kallsyms] [k] finish_task_switch + 0.04% kworker/3:1 [kernel.kallsyms] [k] finish_task_switch + 0.04% kworker/1:0 [kernel.kallsyms] [k] finish_task_switch + 0.03% binary [kernel.kallsyms] [k] copy_page ======================================================================== Thanks Shakeel for the testing. [ktkhai@virtuozzo.com: v2] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/151203869520.3915.2587549826865799173.stgit@localhost.localdomain Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/150583358557.26700.8490036563698102569.stgit@localhost.localdomain Signed-off-by: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@virtuozzo.com> Tested-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com> Acked-by: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com> Cc: Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@virtuozzo.com> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2018-04-05 23:25:08 +00:00
rcu_read_lock();
mm: memcontrol: rename memcg_cache_id to memcg_kmem_id The memcg_cache_id() introduced by commit 2633d7a02823 ("slab/slub: consider a memcg parameter in kmem_create_cache") is used to index in the kmem_cache->memcg_params->memcg_caches array. Since kmem_cache->memcg_params.memcg_caches has been removed by commit 9855609bde03 ("mm: memcg/slab: use a single set of kmem_caches for all accounted allocations"). So the name does not need to reflect cache related. Just rename it to memcg_kmem_id. And it can reflect kmem related. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220228122126.37293-17-songmuchun@bytedance.com Signed-off-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com> Cc: Alex Shi <alexs@kernel.org> Cc: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com> Cc: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org> Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> Cc: Fam Zheng <fam.zheng@bytedance.com> Cc: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Kari Argillander <kari.argillander@gmail.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> Cc: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com> Cc: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com> Cc: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com> Cc: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com> Cc: Xiongchun Duan <duanxiongchun@bytedance.com> Cc: Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2022-03-22 21:41:38 +00:00
l = list_lru_from_memcg_idx(lru, nid, memcg_kmem_id(memcg));
mm: list_lru: allocate list_lru_one only when needed In our server, we found a suspected memory leak problem. The kmalloc-32 consumes more than 6GB of memory. Other kmem_caches consume less than 2GB memory. After our in-depth analysis, the memory consumption of kmalloc-32 slab cache is the cause of list_lru_one allocation. crash> p memcg_nr_cache_ids memcg_nr_cache_ids = $2 = 24574 memcg_nr_cache_ids is very large and memory consumption of each list_lru can be calculated with the following formula. num_numa_node * memcg_nr_cache_ids * 32 (kmalloc-32) There are 4 numa nodes in our system, so each list_lru consumes ~3MB. crash> list super_blocks | wc -l 952 Every mount will register 2 list lrus, one is for inode, another is for dentry. There are 952 super_blocks. So the total memory is 952 * 2 * 3 MB (~5.6GB). But the number of memory cgroup is less than 500. So I guess more than 12286 containers have been deployed on this machine (I do not know why there are so many containers, it may be a user's bug or the user really want to do that). And memcg_nr_cache_ids has not been reduced to a suitable value. This can waste a lot of memory. Now the infrastructure for dynamic list_lru_one allocation is ready, so remove statically allocated memory code to save memory. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220228122126.37293-11-songmuchun@bytedance.com Signed-off-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com> Cc: Alex Shi <alexs@kernel.org> Cc: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com> Cc: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org> Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> Cc: Fam Zheng <fam.zheng@bytedance.com> Cc: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Kari Argillander <kari.argillander@gmail.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> Cc: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com> Cc: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com> Cc: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com> Cc: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com> Cc: Xiongchun Duan <duanxiongchun@bytedance.com> Cc: Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2022-03-22 21:41:19 +00:00
count = l ? READ_ONCE(l->nr_items) : 0;
mm: make counting of list_lru_one::nr_items lockless During the reclaiming slab of a memcg, shrink_slab iterates over all registered shrinkers in the system, and tries to count and consume objects related to the cgroup. In case of memory pressure, this behaves bad: I observe high system time and time spent in list_lru_count_one() for many processes on RHEL7 kernel. This patch makes list_lru_node::memcg_lrus rcu protected, that allows to skip taking spinlock in list_lru_count_one(). Shakeel Butt with the patch observes significant perf graph change. He says: ======================================================================== Setup: running a fork-bomb in a memcg of 200MiB on a 8GiB and 4 vcpu VM and recording the trace with 'perf record -g -a'. The trace without the patch: + 34.19% fb.sh [kernel.kallsyms] [k] queued_spin_lock_slowpath + 30.77% fb.sh [kernel.kallsyms] [k] _raw_spin_lock + 3.53% fb.sh [kernel.kallsyms] [k] list_lru_count_one + 2.26% fb.sh [kernel.kallsyms] [k] super_cache_count + 1.68% fb.sh [kernel.kallsyms] [k] shrink_slab + 0.59% fb.sh [kernel.kallsyms] [k] down_read_trylock + 0.48% fb.sh [kernel.kallsyms] [k] _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore + 0.38% fb.sh [kernel.kallsyms] [k] shrink_node_memcg + 0.32% fb.sh [kernel.kallsyms] [k] queue_work_on + 0.26% fb.sh [kernel.kallsyms] [k] count_shadow_nodes With the patch: + 0.16% swapper [kernel.kallsyms] [k] default_idle + 0.13% oom_reaper [kernel.kallsyms] [k] mutex_spin_on_owner + 0.05% perf [kernel.kallsyms] [k] copy_user_generic_string + 0.05% init.real [kernel.kallsyms] [k] wait_consider_task + 0.05% kworker/0:0 [kernel.kallsyms] [k] finish_task_switch + 0.04% kworker/2:1 [kernel.kallsyms] [k] finish_task_switch + 0.04% kworker/3:1 [kernel.kallsyms] [k] finish_task_switch + 0.04% kworker/1:0 [kernel.kallsyms] [k] finish_task_switch + 0.03% binary [kernel.kallsyms] [k] copy_page ======================================================================== Thanks Shakeel for the testing. [ktkhai@virtuozzo.com: v2] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/151203869520.3915.2587549826865799173.stgit@localhost.localdomain Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/150583358557.26700.8490036563698102569.stgit@localhost.localdomain Signed-off-by: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@virtuozzo.com> Tested-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com> Acked-by: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com> Cc: Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@virtuozzo.com> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2018-04-05 23:25:08 +00:00
rcu_read_unlock();
list_lru: per-node list infrastructure Now that we have an LRU list API, we can start to enhance the implementation. This splits the single LRU list into per-node lists and locks to enhance scalability. Items are placed on lists according to the node the memory belongs to. To make scanning the lists efficient, also track whether the per-node lists have entries in them in a active nodemask. Note: We use a fixed-size array for the node LRU, this struct can be very big if MAX_NUMNODES is big. If this becomes a problem this is fixable by turning this into a pointer and dynamically allocating this to nr_node_ids. This quantity is firwmare-provided, and still would provide room for all nodes at the cost of a pointer lookup and an extra allocation. Because that allocation will most likely come from a may very well fail. [glommer@openvz.org: fix warnings, added note about node lru] Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <glommer@openvz.org> Reviewed-by: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com> Acked-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com> Cc: Arve Hjønnevåg <arve@android.com> Cc: Carlos Maiolino <cmaiolino@redhat.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com> Cc: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com> Cc: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Cc: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com> Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org> Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> Cc: Kent Overstreet <koverstreet@google.com> Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Cc: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com> Cc: Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@vmware.com> Cc: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2013-08-28 00:18:00 +00:00
if (unlikely(count < 0))
count = 0;
list_lru: per-node list infrastructure Now that we have an LRU list API, we can start to enhance the implementation. This splits the single LRU list into per-node lists and locks to enhance scalability. Items are placed on lists according to the node the memory belongs to. To make scanning the lists efficient, also track whether the per-node lists have entries in them in a active nodemask. Note: We use a fixed-size array for the node LRU, this struct can be very big if MAX_NUMNODES is big. If this becomes a problem this is fixable by turning this into a pointer and dynamically allocating this to nr_node_ids. This quantity is firwmare-provided, and still would provide room for all nodes at the cost of a pointer lookup and an extra allocation. Because that allocation will most likely come from a may very well fail. [glommer@openvz.org: fix warnings, added note about node lru] Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <glommer@openvz.org> Reviewed-by: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com> Acked-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com> Cc: Arve Hjønnevåg <arve@android.com> Cc: Carlos Maiolino <cmaiolino@redhat.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com> Cc: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com> Cc: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Cc: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com> Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org> Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> Cc: Kent Overstreet <koverstreet@google.com> Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Cc: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com> Cc: Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@vmware.com> Cc: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2013-08-28 00:18:00 +00:00
return count;
}
list_lru: introduce per-memcg lists There are several FS shrinkers, including super_block::s_shrink, that keep reclaimable objects in the list_lru structure. Hence to turn them to memcg-aware shrinkers, it is enough to make list_lru per-memcg. This patch does the trick. It adds an array of lru lists to the list_lru_node structure (per-node part of the list_lru), one for each kmem-active memcg, and dispatches every item addition or removal to the list corresponding to the memcg which the item is accounted to. So now the list_lru structure is not just per node, but per node and per memcg. Not all list_lrus need this feature, so this patch also adds a new method, list_lru_init_memcg, which initializes a list_lru as memcg aware. Otherwise (i.e. if initialized with old list_lru_init), the list_lru won't have per memcg lists. Just like per memcg caches arrays, the arrays of per-memcg lists are indexed by memcg_cache_id, so we must grow them whenever memcg_nr_cache_ids is increased. So we introduce a callback, memcg_update_all_list_lrus, invoked by memcg_alloc_cache_id if the id space is full. The locking is implemented in a manner similar to lruvecs, i.e. we have one lock per node that protects all lists (both global and per cgroup) on the node. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@parallels.com> Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz> Cc: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com> Cc: Glauber Costa <glommer@gmail.com> Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com> Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2015-02-12 22:59:10 +00:00
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(list_lru_count_one);
unsigned long list_lru_count_node(struct list_lru *lru, int nid)
{
struct list_lru_node *nlru;
list_lru: introduce per-memcg lists There are several FS shrinkers, including super_block::s_shrink, that keep reclaimable objects in the list_lru structure. Hence to turn them to memcg-aware shrinkers, it is enough to make list_lru per-memcg. This patch does the trick. It adds an array of lru lists to the list_lru_node structure (per-node part of the list_lru), one for each kmem-active memcg, and dispatches every item addition or removal to the list corresponding to the memcg which the item is accounted to. So now the list_lru structure is not just per node, but per node and per memcg. Not all list_lrus need this feature, so this patch also adds a new method, list_lru_init_memcg, which initializes a list_lru as memcg aware. Otherwise (i.e. if initialized with old list_lru_init), the list_lru won't have per memcg lists. Just like per memcg caches arrays, the arrays of per-memcg lists are indexed by memcg_cache_id, so we must grow them whenever memcg_nr_cache_ids is increased. So we introduce a callback, memcg_update_all_list_lrus, invoked by memcg_alloc_cache_id if the id space is full. The locking is implemented in a manner similar to lruvecs, i.e. we have one lock per node that protects all lists (both global and per cgroup) on the node. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@parallels.com> Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz> Cc: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com> Cc: Glauber Costa <glommer@gmail.com> Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com> Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2015-02-12 22:59:10 +00:00
nlru = &lru->node[nid];
mm/list_lru: split the lock to per-cgroup scope Currently, every list_lru has a per-node lock that protects adding, deletion, isolation, and reparenting of all list_lru_one instances belonging to this list_lru on this node. This lock contention is heavy when multiple cgroups modify the same list_lru. This lock can be split into per-cgroup scope to reduce contention. To achieve this, we need a stable list_lru_one for every cgroup. This commit adds a lock to each list_lru_one and introduced a helper function lock_list_lru_of_memcg, making it possible to pin the list_lru of a memcg. Then reworked the reparenting process. Reparenting will switch the list_lru_one instances one by one. By locking each instance and marking it dead using the nr_items counter, reparenting ensures that all items in the corresponding cgroup (on-list or not, because items have a stable cgroup, see below) will see the list_lru_one switch synchronously. Objcg reparent is also moved after list_lru reparent so items will have a stable mem cgroup until all list_lru_one instances are drained. The only caller that doesn't work the *_obj interfaces are direct calls to list_lru_{add,del}. But it's only used by zswap and that's also based on objcg, so it's fine. This also changes the bahaviour of the isolation function when LRU_RETRY or LRU_REMOVED_RETRY is returned, because now releasing the lock could unblock reparenting and free the list_lru_one, isolation function will have to return withoug re-lock the lru. prepare() { mkdir /tmp/test-fs modprobe brd rd_nr=1 rd_size=33554432 mkfs.xfs -f /dev/ram0 mount -t xfs /dev/ram0 /tmp/test-fs for i in $(seq 1 512); do mkdir "/tmp/test-fs/$i" for j in $(seq 1 10240); do echo TEST-CONTENT > "/tmp/test-fs/$i/$j" done & done; wait } do_test() { read_worker() { sleep 1 tar -cv "$1" &>/dev/null } read_in_all() { cd "/tmp/test-fs" && ls for i in $(seq 1 512); do (exec sh -c 'echo "$PPID"') > "/sys/fs/cgroup/benchmark/$i/cgroup.procs" read_worker "$i" & done; wait } for i in $(seq 1 512); do mkdir -p "/sys/fs/cgroup/benchmark/$i" done echo +memory > /sys/fs/cgroup/benchmark/cgroup.subtree_control echo 512M > /sys/fs/cgroup/benchmark/memory.max echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches time read_in_all } Above script simulates compression of small files in multiple cgroups with memory pressure. Run prepare() then do_test for 6 times: Before: real 0m7.762s user 0m11.340s sys 3m11.224s real 0m8.123s user 0m11.548s sys 3m2.549s real 0m7.736s user 0m11.515s sys 3m11.171s real 0m8.539s user 0m11.508s sys 3m7.618s real 0m7.928s user 0m11.349s sys 3m13.063s real 0m8.105s user 0m11.128s sys 3m14.313s After this commit (about ~15% faster): real 0m6.953s user 0m11.327s sys 2m42.912s real 0m7.453s user 0m11.343s sys 2m51.942s real 0m6.916s user 0m11.269s sys 2m43.957s real 0m6.894s user 0m11.528s sys 2m45.346s real 0m6.911s user 0m11.095s sys 2m43.168s real 0m6.773s user 0m11.518s sys 2m40.774s Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241104175257.60853-6-ryncsn@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Kairui Song <kasong@tencent.com> Cc: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@bytedance.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev> Cc: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com> Cc: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev> Cc: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-11-04 17:52:56 +00:00
return atomic_long_read(&nlru->nr_items);
list_lru: introduce per-memcg lists There are several FS shrinkers, including super_block::s_shrink, that keep reclaimable objects in the list_lru structure. Hence to turn them to memcg-aware shrinkers, it is enough to make list_lru per-memcg. This patch does the trick. It adds an array of lru lists to the list_lru_node structure (per-node part of the list_lru), one for each kmem-active memcg, and dispatches every item addition or removal to the list corresponding to the memcg which the item is accounted to. So now the list_lru structure is not just per node, but per node and per memcg. Not all list_lrus need this feature, so this patch also adds a new method, list_lru_init_memcg, which initializes a list_lru as memcg aware. Otherwise (i.e. if initialized with old list_lru_init), the list_lru won't have per memcg lists. Just like per memcg caches arrays, the arrays of per-memcg lists are indexed by memcg_cache_id, so we must grow them whenever memcg_nr_cache_ids is increased. So we introduce a callback, memcg_update_all_list_lrus, invoked by memcg_alloc_cache_id if the id space is full. The locking is implemented in a manner similar to lruvecs, i.e. we have one lock per node that protects all lists (both global and per cgroup) on the node. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@parallels.com> Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz> Cc: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com> Cc: Glauber Costa <glommer@gmail.com> Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com> Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2015-02-12 22:59:10 +00:00
}
list_lru: per-node API This patch adapts the list_lru API to accept an optional node argument, to be used by NUMA aware shrinking functions. Code that does not care about the NUMA placement of objects can still call into the very same functions as before. They will simply iterate over all nodes. Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <glommer@openvz.org> Cc: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com> Cc: Arve Hjønnevåg <arve@android.com> Cc: Carlos Maiolino <cmaiolino@redhat.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com> Cc: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com> Cc: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Cc: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com> Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org> Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> Cc: Kent Overstreet <koverstreet@google.com> Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Cc: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com> Cc: Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@vmware.com> Cc: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2013-08-28 00:18:02 +00:00
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(list_lru_count_node);
list_lru: per-node list infrastructure Now that we have an LRU list API, we can start to enhance the implementation. This splits the single LRU list into per-node lists and locks to enhance scalability. Items are placed on lists according to the node the memory belongs to. To make scanning the lists efficient, also track whether the per-node lists have entries in them in a active nodemask. Note: We use a fixed-size array for the node LRU, this struct can be very big if MAX_NUMNODES is big. If this becomes a problem this is fixable by turning this into a pointer and dynamically allocating this to nr_node_ids. This quantity is firwmare-provided, and still would provide room for all nodes at the cost of a pointer lookup and an extra allocation. Because that allocation will most likely come from a may very well fail. [glommer@openvz.org: fix warnings, added note about node lru] Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <glommer@openvz.org> Reviewed-by: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com> Acked-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com> Cc: Arve Hjønnevåg <arve@android.com> Cc: Carlos Maiolino <cmaiolino@redhat.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com> Cc: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com> Cc: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Cc: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com> Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org> Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> Cc: Kent Overstreet <koverstreet@google.com> Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Cc: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com> Cc: Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@vmware.com> Cc: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2013-08-28 00:18:00 +00:00
list_lru: introduce per-memcg lists There are several FS shrinkers, including super_block::s_shrink, that keep reclaimable objects in the list_lru structure. Hence to turn them to memcg-aware shrinkers, it is enough to make list_lru per-memcg. This patch does the trick. It adds an array of lru lists to the list_lru_node structure (per-node part of the list_lru), one for each kmem-active memcg, and dispatches every item addition or removal to the list corresponding to the memcg which the item is accounted to. So now the list_lru structure is not just per node, but per node and per memcg. Not all list_lrus need this feature, so this patch also adds a new method, list_lru_init_memcg, which initializes a list_lru as memcg aware. Otherwise (i.e. if initialized with old list_lru_init), the list_lru won't have per memcg lists. Just like per memcg caches arrays, the arrays of per-memcg lists are indexed by memcg_cache_id, so we must grow them whenever memcg_nr_cache_ids is increased. So we introduce a callback, memcg_update_all_list_lrus, invoked by memcg_alloc_cache_id if the id space is full. The locking is implemented in a manner similar to lruvecs, i.e. we have one lock per node that protects all lists (both global and per cgroup) on the node. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@parallels.com> Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz> Cc: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com> Cc: Glauber Costa <glommer@gmail.com> Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com> Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2015-02-12 22:59:10 +00:00
static unsigned long
mm/list_lru: split the lock to per-cgroup scope Currently, every list_lru has a per-node lock that protects adding, deletion, isolation, and reparenting of all list_lru_one instances belonging to this list_lru on this node. This lock contention is heavy when multiple cgroups modify the same list_lru. This lock can be split into per-cgroup scope to reduce contention. To achieve this, we need a stable list_lru_one for every cgroup. This commit adds a lock to each list_lru_one and introduced a helper function lock_list_lru_of_memcg, making it possible to pin the list_lru of a memcg. Then reworked the reparenting process. Reparenting will switch the list_lru_one instances one by one. By locking each instance and marking it dead using the nr_items counter, reparenting ensures that all items in the corresponding cgroup (on-list or not, because items have a stable cgroup, see below) will see the list_lru_one switch synchronously. Objcg reparent is also moved after list_lru reparent so items will have a stable mem cgroup until all list_lru_one instances are drained. The only caller that doesn't work the *_obj interfaces are direct calls to list_lru_{add,del}. But it's only used by zswap and that's also based on objcg, so it's fine. This also changes the bahaviour of the isolation function when LRU_RETRY or LRU_REMOVED_RETRY is returned, because now releasing the lock could unblock reparenting and free the list_lru_one, isolation function will have to return withoug re-lock the lru. prepare() { mkdir /tmp/test-fs modprobe brd rd_nr=1 rd_size=33554432 mkfs.xfs -f /dev/ram0 mount -t xfs /dev/ram0 /tmp/test-fs for i in $(seq 1 512); do mkdir "/tmp/test-fs/$i" for j in $(seq 1 10240); do echo TEST-CONTENT > "/tmp/test-fs/$i/$j" done & done; wait } do_test() { read_worker() { sleep 1 tar -cv "$1" &>/dev/null } read_in_all() { cd "/tmp/test-fs" && ls for i in $(seq 1 512); do (exec sh -c 'echo "$PPID"') > "/sys/fs/cgroup/benchmark/$i/cgroup.procs" read_worker "$i" & done; wait } for i in $(seq 1 512); do mkdir -p "/sys/fs/cgroup/benchmark/$i" done echo +memory > /sys/fs/cgroup/benchmark/cgroup.subtree_control echo 512M > /sys/fs/cgroup/benchmark/memory.max echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches time read_in_all } Above script simulates compression of small files in multiple cgroups with memory pressure. Run prepare() then do_test for 6 times: Before: real 0m7.762s user 0m11.340s sys 3m11.224s real 0m8.123s user 0m11.548s sys 3m2.549s real 0m7.736s user 0m11.515s sys 3m11.171s real 0m8.539s user 0m11.508s sys 3m7.618s real 0m7.928s user 0m11.349s sys 3m13.063s real 0m8.105s user 0m11.128s sys 3m14.313s After this commit (about ~15% faster): real 0m6.953s user 0m11.327s sys 2m42.912s real 0m7.453s user 0m11.343s sys 2m51.942s real 0m6.916s user 0m11.269s sys 2m43.957s real 0m6.894s user 0m11.528s sys 2m45.346s real 0m6.911s user 0m11.095s sys 2m43.168s real 0m6.773s user 0m11.518s sys 2m40.774s Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241104175257.60853-6-ryncsn@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Kairui Song <kasong@tencent.com> Cc: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@bytedance.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev> Cc: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com> Cc: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev> Cc: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-11-04 17:52:56 +00:00
__list_lru_walk_one(struct list_lru *lru, int nid, struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
list_lru: introduce per-memcg lists There are several FS shrinkers, including super_block::s_shrink, that keep reclaimable objects in the list_lru structure. Hence to turn them to memcg-aware shrinkers, it is enough to make list_lru per-memcg. This patch does the trick. It adds an array of lru lists to the list_lru_node structure (per-node part of the list_lru), one for each kmem-active memcg, and dispatches every item addition or removal to the list corresponding to the memcg which the item is accounted to. So now the list_lru structure is not just per node, but per node and per memcg. Not all list_lrus need this feature, so this patch also adds a new method, list_lru_init_memcg, which initializes a list_lru as memcg aware. Otherwise (i.e. if initialized with old list_lru_init), the list_lru won't have per memcg lists. Just like per memcg caches arrays, the arrays of per-memcg lists are indexed by memcg_cache_id, so we must grow them whenever memcg_nr_cache_ids is increased. So we introduce a callback, memcg_update_all_list_lrus, invoked by memcg_alloc_cache_id if the id space is full. The locking is implemented in a manner similar to lruvecs, i.e. we have one lock per node that protects all lists (both global and per cgroup) on the node. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@parallels.com> Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz> Cc: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com> Cc: Glauber Costa <glommer@gmail.com> Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com> Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2015-02-12 22:59:10 +00:00
list_lru_walk_cb isolate, void *cb_arg,
mm/list_lru: split the lock to per-cgroup scope Currently, every list_lru has a per-node lock that protects adding, deletion, isolation, and reparenting of all list_lru_one instances belonging to this list_lru on this node. This lock contention is heavy when multiple cgroups modify the same list_lru. This lock can be split into per-cgroup scope to reduce contention. To achieve this, we need a stable list_lru_one for every cgroup. This commit adds a lock to each list_lru_one and introduced a helper function lock_list_lru_of_memcg, making it possible to pin the list_lru of a memcg. Then reworked the reparenting process. Reparenting will switch the list_lru_one instances one by one. By locking each instance and marking it dead using the nr_items counter, reparenting ensures that all items in the corresponding cgroup (on-list or not, because items have a stable cgroup, see below) will see the list_lru_one switch synchronously. Objcg reparent is also moved after list_lru reparent so items will have a stable mem cgroup until all list_lru_one instances are drained. The only caller that doesn't work the *_obj interfaces are direct calls to list_lru_{add,del}. But it's only used by zswap and that's also based on objcg, so it's fine. This also changes the bahaviour of the isolation function when LRU_RETRY or LRU_REMOVED_RETRY is returned, because now releasing the lock could unblock reparenting and free the list_lru_one, isolation function will have to return withoug re-lock the lru. prepare() { mkdir /tmp/test-fs modprobe brd rd_nr=1 rd_size=33554432 mkfs.xfs -f /dev/ram0 mount -t xfs /dev/ram0 /tmp/test-fs for i in $(seq 1 512); do mkdir "/tmp/test-fs/$i" for j in $(seq 1 10240); do echo TEST-CONTENT > "/tmp/test-fs/$i/$j" done & done; wait } do_test() { read_worker() { sleep 1 tar -cv "$1" &>/dev/null } read_in_all() { cd "/tmp/test-fs" && ls for i in $(seq 1 512); do (exec sh -c 'echo "$PPID"') > "/sys/fs/cgroup/benchmark/$i/cgroup.procs" read_worker "$i" & done; wait } for i in $(seq 1 512); do mkdir -p "/sys/fs/cgroup/benchmark/$i" done echo +memory > /sys/fs/cgroup/benchmark/cgroup.subtree_control echo 512M > /sys/fs/cgroup/benchmark/memory.max echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches time read_in_all } Above script simulates compression of small files in multiple cgroups with memory pressure. Run prepare() then do_test for 6 times: Before: real 0m7.762s user 0m11.340s sys 3m11.224s real 0m8.123s user 0m11.548s sys 3m2.549s real 0m7.736s user 0m11.515s sys 3m11.171s real 0m8.539s user 0m11.508s sys 3m7.618s real 0m7.928s user 0m11.349s sys 3m13.063s real 0m8.105s user 0m11.128s sys 3m14.313s After this commit (about ~15% faster): real 0m6.953s user 0m11.327s sys 2m42.912s real 0m7.453s user 0m11.343s sys 2m51.942s real 0m6.916s user 0m11.269s sys 2m43.957s real 0m6.894s user 0m11.528s sys 2m45.346s real 0m6.911s user 0m11.095s sys 2m43.168s real 0m6.773s user 0m11.518s sys 2m40.774s Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241104175257.60853-6-ryncsn@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Kairui Song <kasong@tencent.com> Cc: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@bytedance.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev> Cc: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com> Cc: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev> Cc: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-11-04 17:52:56 +00:00
unsigned long *nr_to_walk, bool irq_off)
list_lru: per-node list infrastructure Now that we have an LRU list API, we can start to enhance the implementation. This splits the single LRU list into per-node lists and locks to enhance scalability. Items are placed on lists according to the node the memory belongs to. To make scanning the lists efficient, also track whether the per-node lists have entries in them in a active nodemask. Note: We use a fixed-size array for the node LRU, this struct can be very big if MAX_NUMNODES is big. If this becomes a problem this is fixable by turning this into a pointer and dynamically allocating this to nr_node_ids. This quantity is firwmare-provided, and still would provide room for all nodes at the cost of a pointer lookup and an extra allocation. Because that allocation will most likely come from a may very well fail. [glommer@openvz.org: fix warnings, added note about node lru] Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <glommer@openvz.org> Reviewed-by: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com> Acked-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com> Cc: Arve Hjønnevåg <arve@android.com> Cc: Carlos Maiolino <cmaiolino@redhat.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com> Cc: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com> Cc: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Cc: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com> Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org> Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> Cc: Kent Overstreet <koverstreet@google.com> Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Cc: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com> Cc: Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@vmware.com> Cc: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2013-08-28 00:18:00 +00:00
{
mm: list_lru: transpose the array of per-node per-memcg lru lists Patch series "Optimize list lru memory consumption", v6. In our server, we found a suspected memory leak problem. The kmalloc-32 consumes more than 6GB of memory. Other kmem_caches consume less than 2GB memory. After our in-depth analysis, the memory consumption of kmalloc-32 slab cache is the cause of list_lru_one allocation. crash> p memcg_nr_cache_ids memcg_nr_cache_ids = $2 = 24574 memcg_nr_cache_ids is very large and memory consumption of each list_lru can be calculated with the following formula. num_numa_node * memcg_nr_cache_ids * 32 (kmalloc-32) There are 4 numa nodes in our system, so each list_lru consumes ~3MB. crash> list super_blocks | wc -l 952 Every mount will register 2 list lrus, one is for inode, another is for dentry. There are 952 super_blocks. So the total memory is 952 * 2 * 3 MB (~5.6GB). But now the number of memory cgroups is less than 500. So I guess more than 12286 memory cgroups have been created on this machine (I do not know why there are so many cgroups, it may be a user's bug or the user really want to do that). Because memcg_nr_cache_ids has not been reduced to a suitable value. It leads to waste a lot of memory. If we want to reduce memcg_nr_cache_ids, we have to *reboot* the server. This is not what we want. In order to reduce memcg_nr_cache_ids, I had posted a patchset [1] to do this. But this did not fundamentally solve the problem. We currently allocate scope for every memcg to be able to tracked on every superblock instantiated in the system, regardless of whether that superblock is even accessible to that memcg. These huge memcg counts come from container hosts where memcgs are confined to just a small subset of the total number of superblocks that instantiated at any given point in time. For these systems with huge container counts, list_lru does not need the capability of tracking every memcg on every superblock. What it comes down to is that the list_lru is only needed for a given memcg if that memcg is instatiating and freeing objects on a given list_lru. As Dave said, "Which makes me think we should be moving more towards 'add the memcg to the list_lru at the first insert' model rather than 'instantiate all at memcg init time just in case'." This patchset aims to optimize the list lru memory consumption from different aspects. I had done a easy test to show the optimization. I create 10k memory cgroups and mount 10k filesystems in the systems. We use free command to show how many memory does the systems comsumes after this operation (There are 2 numa nodes in the system). +-----------------------+------------------------+ | condition | memory consumption | +-----------------------+------------------------+ | without this patchset | 24464 MB | +-----------------------+------------------------+ | after patch 1 | 21957 MB | <--------+ +-----------------------+------------------------+ | | after patch 10 | 6895 MB | | +-----------------------+------------------------+ | | after patch 12 | 4367 MB | | +-----------------------+------------------------+ | | The more the number of nodes, the more obvious the effect---+ BTW, there was a recent discussion [2] on the same issue. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20210428094949.43579-1-songmuchun@bytedance.com/ [2] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20210405054848.GA1077931@in.ibm.com/ This series not only optimizes the memory usage of list_lru but also simplifies the code. This patch (of 16): The current scheme of maintaining per-node per-memcg lru lists looks like: struct list_lru { struct list_lru_node *node; (for each node) struct list_lru_memcg *memcg_lrus; struct list_lru_one *lru[]; (for each memcg) } By effectively transposing the two-dimension array of list_lru_one's structures (per-node per-memcg => per-memcg per-node) it's possible to save some memory and simplify alloc/dealloc paths. The new scheme looks like: struct list_lru { struct list_lru_memcg *mlrus; struct list_lru_per_memcg *mlru[]; (for each memcg) struct list_lru_one node[0]; (for each node) } Memory savings are coming from not only 'struct rcu_head' but also some pointer arrays used to store the pointer to 'struct list_lru_one'. The array is per node and its size is 8 (a pointer) * num_memcgs. So the total size of the arrays is 8 * num_nodes * memcg_nr_cache_ids. After this patch, the size becomes 8 * memcg_nr_cache_ids. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220228122126.37293-1-songmuchun@bytedance.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220228122126.37293-2-songmuchun@bytedance.com Signed-off-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com> Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> Cc: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com> Cc: Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com> Cc: Alex Shi <alexs@kernel.org> Cc: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com> Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> Cc: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com> Cc: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com> Cc: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org> Cc: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org> Cc: Kari Argillander <kari.argillander@gmail.com> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com> Cc: Xiongchun Duan <duanxiongchun@bytedance.com> Cc: Fam Zheng <fam.zheng@bytedance.com> Cc: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev> Cc: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2022-03-22 21:40:53 +00:00
struct list_lru_node *nlru = &lru->node[nid];
mm/list_lru: split the lock to per-cgroup scope Currently, every list_lru has a per-node lock that protects adding, deletion, isolation, and reparenting of all list_lru_one instances belonging to this list_lru on this node. This lock contention is heavy when multiple cgroups modify the same list_lru. This lock can be split into per-cgroup scope to reduce contention. To achieve this, we need a stable list_lru_one for every cgroup. This commit adds a lock to each list_lru_one and introduced a helper function lock_list_lru_of_memcg, making it possible to pin the list_lru of a memcg. Then reworked the reparenting process. Reparenting will switch the list_lru_one instances one by one. By locking each instance and marking it dead using the nr_items counter, reparenting ensures that all items in the corresponding cgroup (on-list or not, because items have a stable cgroup, see below) will see the list_lru_one switch synchronously. Objcg reparent is also moved after list_lru reparent so items will have a stable mem cgroup until all list_lru_one instances are drained. The only caller that doesn't work the *_obj interfaces are direct calls to list_lru_{add,del}. But it's only used by zswap and that's also based on objcg, so it's fine. This also changes the bahaviour of the isolation function when LRU_RETRY or LRU_REMOVED_RETRY is returned, because now releasing the lock could unblock reparenting and free the list_lru_one, isolation function will have to return withoug re-lock the lru. prepare() { mkdir /tmp/test-fs modprobe brd rd_nr=1 rd_size=33554432 mkfs.xfs -f /dev/ram0 mount -t xfs /dev/ram0 /tmp/test-fs for i in $(seq 1 512); do mkdir "/tmp/test-fs/$i" for j in $(seq 1 10240); do echo TEST-CONTENT > "/tmp/test-fs/$i/$j" done & done; wait } do_test() { read_worker() { sleep 1 tar -cv "$1" &>/dev/null } read_in_all() { cd "/tmp/test-fs" && ls for i in $(seq 1 512); do (exec sh -c 'echo "$PPID"') > "/sys/fs/cgroup/benchmark/$i/cgroup.procs" read_worker "$i" & done; wait } for i in $(seq 1 512); do mkdir -p "/sys/fs/cgroup/benchmark/$i" done echo +memory > /sys/fs/cgroup/benchmark/cgroup.subtree_control echo 512M > /sys/fs/cgroup/benchmark/memory.max echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches time read_in_all } Above script simulates compression of small files in multiple cgroups with memory pressure. Run prepare() then do_test for 6 times: Before: real 0m7.762s user 0m11.340s sys 3m11.224s real 0m8.123s user 0m11.548s sys 3m2.549s real 0m7.736s user 0m11.515s sys 3m11.171s real 0m8.539s user 0m11.508s sys 3m7.618s real 0m7.928s user 0m11.349s sys 3m13.063s real 0m8.105s user 0m11.128s sys 3m14.313s After this commit (about ~15% faster): real 0m6.953s user 0m11.327s sys 2m42.912s real 0m7.453s user 0m11.343s sys 2m51.942s real 0m6.916s user 0m11.269s sys 2m43.957s real 0m6.894s user 0m11.528s sys 2m45.346s real 0m6.911s user 0m11.095s sys 2m43.168s real 0m6.773s user 0m11.518s sys 2m40.774s Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241104175257.60853-6-ryncsn@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Kairui Song <kasong@tencent.com> Cc: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@bytedance.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev> Cc: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com> Cc: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev> Cc: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-11-04 17:52:56 +00:00
struct list_lru_one *l = NULL;
list: add a new LRU list type Several subsystems use the same construct for LRU lists - a list head, a spin lock and and item count. They also use exactly the same code for adding and removing items from the LRU. Create a generic type for these LRU lists. This is the beginning of generic, node aware LRUs for shrinkers to work with. [glommer@openvz.org: enum defined constants for lru. Suggested by gthelen, don't relock over retry] Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <glommer@openvz.org> Reviewed-by: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com> Acked-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com> Cc: Arve Hjønnevåg <arve@android.com> Cc: Carlos Maiolino <cmaiolino@redhat.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com> Cc: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com> Cc: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Cc: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com> Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org> Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> Cc: Kent Overstreet <koverstreet@google.com> Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Cc: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com> Cc: Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@vmware.com> Cc: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2013-08-28 00:17:58 +00:00
struct list_head *item, *n;
list_lru: per-node list infrastructure Now that we have an LRU list API, we can start to enhance the implementation. This splits the single LRU list into per-node lists and locks to enhance scalability. Items are placed on lists according to the node the memory belongs to. To make scanning the lists efficient, also track whether the per-node lists have entries in them in a active nodemask. Note: We use a fixed-size array for the node LRU, this struct can be very big if MAX_NUMNODES is big. If this becomes a problem this is fixable by turning this into a pointer and dynamically allocating this to nr_node_ids. This quantity is firwmare-provided, and still would provide room for all nodes at the cost of a pointer lookup and an extra allocation. Because that allocation will most likely come from a may very well fail. [glommer@openvz.org: fix warnings, added note about node lru] Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <glommer@openvz.org> Reviewed-by: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com> Acked-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com> Cc: Arve Hjønnevåg <arve@android.com> Cc: Carlos Maiolino <cmaiolino@redhat.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com> Cc: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com> Cc: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Cc: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com> Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org> Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> Cc: Kent Overstreet <koverstreet@google.com> Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Cc: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com> Cc: Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@vmware.com> Cc: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2013-08-28 00:18:00 +00:00
unsigned long isolated = 0;
list: add a new LRU list type Several subsystems use the same construct for LRU lists - a list head, a spin lock and and item count. They also use exactly the same code for adding and removing items from the LRU. Create a generic type for these LRU lists. This is the beginning of generic, node aware LRUs for shrinkers to work with. [glommer@openvz.org: enum defined constants for lru. Suggested by gthelen, don't relock over retry] Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <glommer@openvz.org> Reviewed-by: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com> Acked-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com> Cc: Arve Hjønnevåg <arve@android.com> Cc: Carlos Maiolino <cmaiolino@redhat.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com> Cc: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com> Cc: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Cc: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com> Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org> Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> Cc: Kent Overstreet <koverstreet@google.com> Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Cc: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com> Cc: Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@vmware.com> Cc: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2013-08-28 00:17:58 +00:00
restart:
mm/list_lru: split the lock to per-cgroup scope Currently, every list_lru has a per-node lock that protects adding, deletion, isolation, and reparenting of all list_lru_one instances belonging to this list_lru on this node. This lock contention is heavy when multiple cgroups modify the same list_lru. This lock can be split into per-cgroup scope to reduce contention. To achieve this, we need a stable list_lru_one for every cgroup. This commit adds a lock to each list_lru_one and introduced a helper function lock_list_lru_of_memcg, making it possible to pin the list_lru of a memcg. Then reworked the reparenting process. Reparenting will switch the list_lru_one instances one by one. By locking each instance and marking it dead using the nr_items counter, reparenting ensures that all items in the corresponding cgroup (on-list or not, because items have a stable cgroup, see below) will see the list_lru_one switch synchronously. Objcg reparent is also moved after list_lru reparent so items will have a stable mem cgroup until all list_lru_one instances are drained. The only caller that doesn't work the *_obj interfaces are direct calls to list_lru_{add,del}. But it's only used by zswap and that's also based on objcg, so it's fine. This also changes the bahaviour of the isolation function when LRU_RETRY or LRU_REMOVED_RETRY is returned, because now releasing the lock could unblock reparenting and free the list_lru_one, isolation function will have to return withoug re-lock the lru. prepare() { mkdir /tmp/test-fs modprobe brd rd_nr=1 rd_size=33554432 mkfs.xfs -f /dev/ram0 mount -t xfs /dev/ram0 /tmp/test-fs for i in $(seq 1 512); do mkdir "/tmp/test-fs/$i" for j in $(seq 1 10240); do echo TEST-CONTENT > "/tmp/test-fs/$i/$j" done & done; wait } do_test() { read_worker() { sleep 1 tar -cv "$1" &>/dev/null } read_in_all() { cd "/tmp/test-fs" && ls for i in $(seq 1 512); do (exec sh -c 'echo "$PPID"') > "/sys/fs/cgroup/benchmark/$i/cgroup.procs" read_worker "$i" & done; wait } for i in $(seq 1 512); do mkdir -p "/sys/fs/cgroup/benchmark/$i" done echo +memory > /sys/fs/cgroup/benchmark/cgroup.subtree_control echo 512M > /sys/fs/cgroup/benchmark/memory.max echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches time read_in_all } Above script simulates compression of small files in multiple cgroups with memory pressure. Run prepare() then do_test for 6 times: Before: real 0m7.762s user 0m11.340s sys 3m11.224s real 0m8.123s user 0m11.548s sys 3m2.549s real 0m7.736s user 0m11.515s sys 3m11.171s real 0m8.539s user 0m11.508s sys 3m7.618s real 0m7.928s user 0m11.349s sys 3m13.063s real 0m8.105s user 0m11.128s sys 3m14.313s After this commit (about ~15% faster): real 0m6.953s user 0m11.327s sys 2m42.912s real 0m7.453s user 0m11.343s sys 2m51.942s real 0m6.916s user 0m11.269s sys 2m43.957s real 0m6.894s user 0m11.528s sys 2m45.346s real 0m6.911s user 0m11.095s sys 2m43.168s real 0m6.773s user 0m11.518s sys 2m40.774s Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241104175257.60853-6-ryncsn@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Kairui Song <kasong@tencent.com> Cc: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@bytedance.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev> Cc: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com> Cc: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev> Cc: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-11-04 17:52:56 +00:00
l = lock_list_lru_of_memcg(lru, nid, memcg, irq_off, true);
mm: list_lru: allocate list_lru_one only when needed In our server, we found a suspected memory leak problem. The kmalloc-32 consumes more than 6GB of memory. Other kmem_caches consume less than 2GB memory. After our in-depth analysis, the memory consumption of kmalloc-32 slab cache is the cause of list_lru_one allocation. crash> p memcg_nr_cache_ids memcg_nr_cache_ids = $2 = 24574 memcg_nr_cache_ids is very large and memory consumption of each list_lru can be calculated with the following formula. num_numa_node * memcg_nr_cache_ids * 32 (kmalloc-32) There are 4 numa nodes in our system, so each list_lru consumes ~3MB. crash> list super_blocks | wc -l 952 Every mount will register 2 list lrus, one is for inode, another is for dentry. There are 952 super_blocks. So the total memory is 952 * 2 * 3 MB (~5.6GB). But the number of memory cgroup is less than 500. So I guess more than 12286 containers have been deployed on this machine (I do not know why there are so many containers, it may be a user's bug or the user really want to do that). And memcg_nr_cache_ids has not been reduced to a suitable value. This can waste a lot of memory. Now the infrastructure for dynamic list_lru_one allocation is ready, so remove statically allocated memory code to save memory. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220228122126.37293-11-songmuchun@bytedance.com Signed-off-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com> Cc: Alex Shi <alexs@kernel.org> Cc: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com> Cc: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org> Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> Cc: Fam Zheng <fam.zheng@bytedance.com> Cc: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Kari Argillander <kari.argillander@gmail.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> Cc: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com> Cc: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com> Cc: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com> Cc: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com> Cc: Xiongchun Duan <duanxiongchun@bytedance.com> Cc: Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2022-03-22 21:41:19 +00:00
if (!l)
mm/list_lru: split the lock to per-cgroup scope Currently, every list_lru has a per-node lock that protects adding, deletion, isolation, and reparenting of all list_lru_one instances belonging to this list_lru on this node. This lock contention is heavy when multiple cgroups modify the same list_lru. This lock can be split into per-cgroup scope to reduce contention. To achieve this, we need a stable list_lru_one for every cgroup. This commit adds a lock to each list_lru_one and introduced a helper function lock_list_lru_of_memcg, making it possible to pin the list_lru of a memcg. Then reworked the reparenting process. Reparenting will switch the list_lru_one instances one by one. By locking each instance and marking it dead using the nr_items counter, reparenting ensures that all items in the corresponding cgroup (on-list or not, because items have a stable cgroup, see below) will see the list_lru_one switch synchronously. Objcg reparent is also moved after list_lru reparent so items will have a stable mem cgroup until all list_lru_one instances are drained. The only caller that doesn't work the *_obj interfaces are direct calls to list_lru_{add,del}. But it's only used by zswap and that's also based on objcg, so it's fine. This also changes the bahaviour of the isolation function when LRU_RETRY or LRU_REMOVED_RETRY is returned, because now releasing the lock could unblock reparenting and free the list_lru_one, isolation function will have to return withoug re-lock the lru. prepare() { mkdir /tmp/test-fs modprobe brd rd_nr=1 rd_size=33554432 mkfs.xfs -f /dev/ram0 mount -t xfs /dev/ram0 /tmp/test-fs for i in $(seq 1 512); do mkdir "/tmp/test-fs/$i" for j in $(seq 1 10240); do echo TEST-CONTENT > "/tmp/test-fs/$i/$j" done & done; wait } do_test() { read_worker() { sleep 1 tar -cv "$1" &>/dev/null } read_in_all() { cd "/tmp/test-fs" && ls for i in $(seq 1 512); do (exec sh -c 'echo "$PPID"') > "/sys/fs/cgroup/benchmark/$i/cgroup.procs" read_worker "$i" & done; wait } for i in $(seq 1 512); do mkdir -p "/sys/fs/cgroup/benchmark/$i" done echo +memory > /sys/fs/cgroup/benchmark/cgroup.subtree_control echo 512M > /sys/fs/cgroup/benchmark/memory.max echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches time read_in_all } Above script simulates compression of small files in multiple cgroups with memory pressure. Run prepare() then do_test for 6 times: Before: real 0m7.762s user 0m11.340s sys 3m11.224s real 0m8.123s user 0m11.548s sys 3m2.549s real 0m7.736s user 0m11.515s sys 3m11.171s real 0m8.539s user 0m11.508s sys 3m7.618s real 0m7.928s user 0m11.349s sys 3m13.063s real 0m8.105s user 0m11.128s sys 3m14.313s After this commit (about ~15% faster): real 0m6.953s user 0m11.327s sys 2m42.912s real 0m7.453s user 0m11.343s sys 2m51.942s real 0m6.916s user 0m11.269s sys 2m43.957s real 0m6.894s user 0m11.528s sys 2m45.346s real 0m6.911s user 0m11.095s sys 2m43.168s real 0m6.773s user 0m11.518s sys 2m40.774s Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241104175257.60853-6-ryncsn@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Kairui Song <kasong@tencent.com> Cc: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@bytedance.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev> Cc: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com> Cc: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev> Cc: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-11-04 17:52:56 +00:00
return isolated;
list_lru: introduce per-memcg lists There are several FS shrinkers, including super_block::s_shrink, that keep reclaimable objects in the list_lru structure. Hence to turn them to memcg-aware shrinkers, it is enough to make list_lru per-memcg. This patch does the trick. It adds an array of lru lists to the list_lru_node structure (per-node part of the list_lru), one for each kmem-active memcg, and dispatches every item addition or removal to the list corresponding to the memcg which the item is accounted to. So now the list_lru structure is not just per node, but per node and per memcg. Not all list_lrus need this feature, so this patch also adds a new method, list_lru_init_memcg, which initializes a list_lru as memcg aware. Otherwise (i.e. if initialized with old list_lru_init), the list_lru won't have per memcg lists. Just like per memcg caches arrays, the arrays of per-memcg lists are indexed by memcg_cache_id, so we must grow them whenever memcg_nr_cache_ids is increased. So we introduce a callback, memcg_update_all_list_lrus, invoked by memcg_alloc_cache_id if the id space is full. The locking is implemented in a manner similar to lruvecs, i.e. we have one lock per node that protects all lists (both global and per cgroup) on the node. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@parallels.com> Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz> Cc: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com> Cc: Glauber Costa <glommer@gmail.com> Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com> Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2015-02-12 22:59:10 +00:00
list_for_each_safe(item, n, &l->list) {
list: add a new LRU list type Several subsystems use the same construct for LRU lists - a list head, a spin lock and and item count. They also use exactly the same code for adding and removing items from the LRU. Create a generic type for these LRU lists. This is the beginning of generic, node aware LRUs for shrinkers to work with. [glommer@openvz.org: enum defined constants for lru. Suggested by gthelen, don't relock over retry] Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <glommer@openvz.org> Reviewed-by: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com> Acked-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com> Cc: Arve Hjønnevåg <arve@android.com> Cc: Carlos Maiolino <cmaiolino@redhat.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com> Cc: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com> Cc: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Cc: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com> Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org> Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> Cc: Kent Overstreet <koverstreet@google.com> Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Cc: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com> Cc: Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@vmware.com> Cc: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2013-08-28 00:17:58 +00:00
enum lru_status ret;
/*
* decrement nr_to_walk first so that we don't livelock if we
* get stuck on large numbers of LRU_RETRY items
*/
mm: list_lru: fix almost infinite loop causing effective livelock I've seen a fair number of issues with kswapd and other processes appearing to get stuck in v3.12-rc. Using sysrq-p many times seems to indicate that it gets stuck somewhere in list_lru_walk_node(), called from prune_icache_sb() and super_cache_scan(). I never seem to be able to trigger a calltrace for functions above that point. So I decided to add the following to super_cache_scan(): @@ -81,10 +81,14 @@ static unsigned long super_cache_scan(struct shrinker *shrink, inodes = list_lru_count_node(&sb->s_inode_lru, sc->nid); dentries = list_lru_count_node(&sb->s_dentry_lru, sc->nid); total_objects = dentries + inodes + fs_objects + 1; +printk("%s:%u: %s: dentries %lu inodes %lu total %lu\n", current->comm, current->pid, __func__, dentries, inodes, total_objects); /* proportion the scan between the caches */ dentries = mult_frac(sc->nr_to_scan, dentries, total_objects); inodes = mult_frac(sc->nr_to_scan, inodes, total_objects); +printk("%s:%u: %s: dentries %lu inodes %lu\n", current->comm, current->pid, __func__, dentries, inodes); +BUG_ON(dentries == 0); +BUG_ON(inodes == 0); /* * prune the dcache first as the icache is pinned by it, then @@ -99,7 +103,7 @@ static unsigned long super_cache_scan(struct shrinker *shrink, freed += sb->s_op->free_cached_objects(sb, fs_objects, sc->nid); } - +printk("%s:%u: %s: dentries %lu inodes %lu freed %lu\n", current->comm, current->pid, __func__, dentries, inodes, freed); drop_super(sb); return freed; } and shortly thereafter, having applied some pressure, I got this: update-apt-xapi:1616: super_cache_scan: dentries 25632 inodes 2 total 25635 update-apt-xapi:1616: super_cache_scan: dentries 1023 inodes 0 ------------[ cut here ]------------ Kernel BUG at c0101994 [verbose debug info unavailable] Internal error: Oops - BUG: 0 [#3] SMP ARM Modules linked in: fuse rfcomm bnep bluetooth hid_cypress CPU: 0 PID: 1616 Comm: update-apt-xapi Tainted: G D 3.12.0-rc7+ #154 task: daea1200 ti: c3bf8000 task.ti: c3bf8000 PC is at super_cache_scan+0x1c0/0x278 LR is at trace_hardirqs_on+0x14/0x18 Process update-apt-xapi (pid: 1616, stack limit = 0xc3bf8240) ... Backtrace: (super_cache_scan) from [<c00cd69c>] (shrink_slab+0x254/0x4c8) (shrink_slab) from [<c00d09a0>] (try_to_free_pages+0x3a0/0x5e0) (try_to_free_pages) from [<c00c59cc>] (__alloc_pages_nodemask+0x5) (__alloc_pages_nodemask) from [<c00e07c0>] (__pte_alloc+0x2c/0x13) (__pte_alloc) from [<c00e3a70>] (handle_mm_fault+0x84c/0x914) (handle_mm_fault) from [<c001a4cc>] (do_page_fault+0x1f0/0x3bc) (do_page_fault) from [<c001a7b0>] (do_translation_fault+0xac/0xb8) (do_translation_fault) from [<c000840c>] (do_DataAbort+0x38/0xa0) (do_DataAbort) from [<c00133f8>] (__dabt_usr+0x38/0x40) Notice that we had a very low number of inodes, which were reduced to zero my mult_frac(). Now, prune_icache_sb() calls list_lru_walk_node() passing that number of inodes (0) into that as the number of objects to scan: long prune_icache_sb(struct super_block *sb, unsigned long nr_to_scan, int nid) { LIST_HEAD(freeable); long freed; freed = list_lru_walk_node(&sb->s_inode_lru, nid, inode_lru_isolate, &freeable, &nr_to_scan); which does: unsigned long list_lru_walk_node(struct list_lru *lru, int nid, list_lru_walk_cb isolate, void *cb_arg, unsigned long *nr_to_walk) { struct list_lru_node *nlru = &lru->node[nid]; struct list_head *item, *n; unsigned long isolated = 0; spin_lock(&nlru->lock); restart: list_for_each_safe(item, n, &nlru->list) { enum lru_status ret; /* * decrement nr_to_walk first so that we don't livelock if we * get stuck on large numbesr of LRU_RETRY items */ if (--(*nr_to_walk) == 0) break; So, if *nr_to_walk was zero when this function was entered, that means we're wanting to operate on (~0UL)+1 objects - which might as well be infinite. Clearly this is not correct behaviour. If we think about the behaviour of this function when *nr_to_walk is 1, then clearly it's wrong - we decrement first and then test for zero - which results in us doing nothing at all. A post-decrement would give the desired behaviour - we'd try to walk one object and one object only if *nr_to_walk were one. It also gives the correct behaviour for zero - we exit at this point. Fixes: 5cedf721a7cd ("list_lru: fix broken LRU_RETRY behaviour") Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk> Cc: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com> Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> [ Modified to make sure we never underflow the count: this function gets called in a loop, so the 0 -> ~0ul transition is dangerous - Linus ] Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2013-10-30 14:16:16 +00:00
if (!*nr_to_walk)
break;
mm: list_lru: fix almost infinite loop causing effective livelock I've seen a fair number of issues with kswapd and other processes appearing to get stuck in v3.12-rc. Using sysrq-p many times seems to indicate that it gets stuck somewhere in list_lru_walk_node(), called from prune_icache_sb() and super_cache_scan(). I never seem to be able to trigger a calltrace for functions above that point. So I decided to add the following to super_cache_scan(): @@ -81,10 +81,14 @@ static unsigned long super_cache_scan(struct shrinker *shrink, inodes = list_lru_count_node(&sb->s_inode_lru, sc->nid); dentries = list_lru_count_node(&sb->s_dentry_lru, sc->nid); total_objects = dentries + inodes + fs_objects + 1; +printk("%s:%u: %s: dentries %lu inodes %lu total %lu\n", current->comm, current->pid, __func__, dentries, inodes, total_objects); /* proportion the scan between the caches */ dentries = mult_frac(sc->nr_to_scan, dentries, total_objects); inodes = mult_frac(sc->nr_to_scan, inodes, total_objects); +printk("%s:%u: %s: dentries %lu inodes %lu\n", current->comm, current->pid, __func__, dentries, inodes); +BUG_ON(dentries == 0); +BUG_ON(inodes == 0); /* * prune the dcache first as the icache is pinned by it, then @@ -99,7 +103,7 @@ static unsigned long super_cache_scan(struct shrinker *shrink, freed += sb->s_op->free_cached_objects(sb, fs_objects, sc->nid); } - +printk("%s:%u: %s: dentries %lu inodes %lu freed %lu\n", current->comm, current->pid, __func__, dentries, inodes, freed); drop_super(sb); return freed; } and shortly thereafter, having applied some pressure, I got this: update-apt-xapi:1616: super_cache_scan: dentries 25632 inodes 2 total 25635 update-apt-xapi:1616: super_cache_scan: dentries 1023 inodes 0 ------------[ cut here ]------------ Kernel BUG at c0101994 [verbose debug info unavailable] Internal error: Oops - BUG: 0 [#3] SMP ARM Modules linked in: fuse rfcomm bnep bluetooth hid_cypress CPU: 0 PID: 1616 Comm: update-apt-xapi Tainted: G D 3.12.0-rc7+ #154 task: daea1200 ti: c3bf8000 task.ti: c3bf8000 PC is at super_cache_scan+0x1c0/0x278 LR is at trace_hardirqs_on+0x14/0x18 Process update-apt-xapi (pid: 1616, stack limit = 0xc3bf8240) ... Backtrace: (super_cache_scan) from [<c00cd69c>] (shrink_slab+0x254/0x4c8) (shrink_slab) from [<c00d09a0>] (try_to_free_pages+0x3a0/0x5e0) (try_to_free_pages) from [<c00c59cc>] (__alloc_pages_nodemask+0x5) (__alloc_pages_nodemask) from [<c00e07c0>] (__pte_alloc+0x2c/0x13) (__pte_alloc) from [<c00e3a70>] (handle_mm_fault+0x84c/0x914) (handle_mm_fault) from [<c001a4cc>] (do_page_fault+0x1f0/0x3bc) (do_page_fault) from [<c001a7b0>] (do_translation_fault+0xac/0xb8) (do_translation_fault) from [<c000840c>] (do_DataAbort+0x38/0xa0) (do_DataAbort) from [<c00133f8>] (__dabt_usr+0x38/0x40) Notice that we had a very low number of inodes, which were reduced to zero my mult_frac(). Now, prune_icache_sb() calls list_lru_walk_node() passing that number of inodes (0) into that as the number of objects to scan: long prune_icache_sb(struct super_block *sb, unsigned long nr_to_scan, int nid) { LIST_HEAD(freeable); long freed; freed = list_lru_walk_node(&sb->s_inode_lru, nid, inode_lru_isolate, &freeable, &nr_to_scan); which does: unsigned long list_lru_walk_node(struct list_lru *lru, int nid, list_lru_walk_cb isolate, void *cb_arg, unsigned long *nr_to_walk) { struct list_lru_node *nlru = &lru->node[nid]; struct list_head *item, *n; unsigned long isolated = 0; spin_lock(&nlru->lock); restart: list_for_each_safe(item, n, &nlru->list) { enum lru_status ret; /* * decrement nr_to_walk first so that we don't livelock if we * get stuck on large numbesr of LRU_RETRY items */ if (--(*nr_to_walk) == 0) break; So, if *nr_to_walk was zero when this function was entered, that means we're wanting to operate on (~0UL)+1 objects - which might as well be infinite. Clearly this is not correct behaviour. If we think about the behaviour of this function when *nr_to_walk is 1, then clearly it's wrong - we decrement first and then test for zero - which results in us doing nothing at all. A post-decrement would give the desired behaviour - we'd try to walk one object and one object only if *nr_to_walk were one. It also gives the correct behaviour for zero - we exit at this point. Fixes: 5cedf721a7cd ("list_lru: fix broken LRU_RETRY behaviour") Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk> Cc: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com> Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> [ Modified to make sure we never underflow the count: this function gets called in a loop, so the 0 -> ~0ul transition is dangerous - Linus ] Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2013-10-30 14:16:16 +00:00
--*nr_to_walk;
ret = isolate(item, l, cb_arg);
list: add a new LRU list type Several subsystems use the same construct for LRU lists - a list head, a spin lock and and item count. They also use exactly the same code for adding and removing items from the LRU. Create a generic type for these LRU lists. This is the beginning of generic, node aware LRUs for shrinkers to work with. [glommer@openvz.org: enum defined constants for lru. Suggested by gthelen, don't relock over retry] Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <glommer@openvz.org> Reviewed-by: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com> Acked-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com> Cc: Arve Hjønnevåg <arve@android.com> Cc: Carlos Maiolino <cmaiolino@redhat.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com> Cc: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com> Cc: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Cc: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com> Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org> Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> Cc: Kent Overstreet <koverstreet@google.com> Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Cc: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com> Cc: Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@vmware.com> Cc: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2013-08-28 00:17:58 +00:00
switch (ret) {
mm/list_lru: split the lock to per-cgroup scope Currently, every list_lru has a per-node lock that protects adding, deletion, isolation, and reparenting of all list_lru_one instances belonging to this list_lru on this node. This lock contention is heavy when multiple cgroups modify the same list_lru. This lock can be split into per-cgroup scope to reduce contention. To achieve this, we need a stable list_lru_one for every cgroup. This commit adds a lock to each list_lru_one and introduced a helper function lock_list_lru_of_memcg, making it possible to pin the list_lru of a memcg. Then reworked the reparenting process. Reparenting will switch the list_lru_one instances one by one. By locking each instance and marking it dead using the nr_items counter, reparenting ensures that all items in the corresponding cgroup (on-list or not, because items have a stable cgroup, see below) will see the list_lru_one switch synchronously. Objcg reparent is also moved after list_lru reparent so items will have a stable mem cgroup until all list_lru_one instances are drained. The only caller that doesn't work the *_obj interfaces are direct calls to list_lru_{add,del}. But it's only used by zswap and that's also based on objcg, so it's fine. This also changes the bahaviour of the isolation function when LRU_RETRY or LRU_REMOVED_RETRY is returned, because now releasing the lock could unblock reparenting and free the list_lru_one, isolation function will have to return withoug re-lock the lru. prepare() { mkdir /tmp/test-fs modprobe brd rd_nr=1 rd_size=33554432 mkfs.xfs -f /dev/ram0 mount -t xfs /dev/ram0 /tmp/test-fs for i in $(seq 1 512); do mkdir "/tmp/test-fs/$i" for j in $(seq 1 10240); do echo TEST-CONTENT > "/tmp/test-fs/$i/$j" done & done; wait } do_test() { read_worker() { sleep 1 tar -cv "$1" &>/dev/null } read_in_all() { cd "/tmp/test-fs" && ls for i in $(seq 1 512); do (exec sh -c 'echo "$PPID"') > "/sys/fs/cgroup/benchmark/$i/cgroup.procs" read_worker "$i" & done; wait } for i in $(seq 1 512); do mkdir -p "/sys/fs/cgroup/benchmark/$i" done echo +memory > /sys/fs/cgroup/benchmark/cgroup.subtree_control echo 512M > /sys/fs/cgroup/benchmark/memory.max echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches time read_in_all } Above script simulates compression of small files in multiple cgroups with memory pressure. Run prepare() then do_test for 6 times: Before: real 0m7.762s user 0m11.340s sys 3m11.224s real 0m8.123s user 0m11.548s sys 3m2.549s real 0m7.736s user 0m11.515s sys 3m11.171s real 0m8.539s user 0m11.508s sys 3m7.618s real 0m7.928s user 0m11.349s sys 3m13.063s real 0m8.105s user 0m11.128s sys 3m14.313s After this commit (about ~15% faster): real 0m6.953s user 0m11.327s sys 2m42.912s real 0m7.453s user 0m11.343s sys 2m51.942s real 0m6.916s user 0m11.269s sys 2m43.957s real 0m6.894s user 0m11.528s sys 2m45.346s real 0m6.911s user 0m11.095s sys 2m43.168s real 0m6.773s user 0m11.518s sys 2m40.774s Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241104175257.60853-6-ryncsn@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Kairui Song <kasong@tencent.com> Cc: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@bytedance.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev> Cc: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com> Cc: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev> Cc: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-11-04 17:52:56 +00:00
/*
* LRU_RETRY, LRU_REMOVED_RETRY and LRU_STOP will drop the lru
* lock. List traversal will have to restart from scratch.
*/
case LRU_RETRY:
goto restart;
mm: keep page cache radix tree nodes in check Previously, page cache radix tree nodes were freed after reclaim emptied out their page pointers. But now reclaim stores shadow entries in their place, which are only reclaimed when the inodes themselves are reclaimed. This is problematic for bigger files that are still in use after they have a significant amount of their cache reclaimed, without any of those pages actually refaulting. The shadow entries will just sit there and waste memory. In the worst case, the shadow entries will accumulate until the machine runs out of memory. To get this under control, the VM will track radix tree nodes exclusively containing shadow entries on a per-NUMA node list. Per-NUMA rather than global because we expect the radix tree nodes themselves to be allocated node-locally and we want to reduce cross-node references of otherwise independent cache workloads. A simple shrinker will then reclaim these nodes on memory pressure. A few things need to be stored in the radix tree node to implement the shadow node LRU and allow tree deletions coming from the list: 1. There is no index available that would describe the reverse path from the node up to the tree root, which is needed to perform a deletion. To solve this, encode in each node its offset inside the parent. This can be stored in the unused upper bits of the same member that stores the node's height at no extra space cost. 2. The number of shadow entries needs to be counted in addition to the regular entries, to quickly detect when the node is ready to go to the shadow node LRU list. The current entry count is an unsigned int but the maximum number of entries is 64, so a shadow counter can easily be stored in the unused upper bits. 3. Tree modification needs tree lock and tree root, which are located in the address space, so store an address_space backpointer in the node. The parent pointer of the node is in a union with the 2-word rcu_head, so the backpointer comes at no extra cost as well. 4. The node needs to be linked to an LRU list, which requires a list head inside the node. This does increase the size of the node, but it does not change the number of objects that fit into a slab page. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: export the right function] Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Reviewed-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org> Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> Cc: Bob Liu <bob.liu@oracle.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> Cc: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> Cc: Luigi Semenzato <semenzato@google.com> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Cc: Metin Doslu <metin@citusdata.com> Cc: Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com> Cc: Ozgun Erdogan <ozgun@citusdata.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Roman Gushchin <klamm@yandex-team.ru> Cc: Ryan Mallon <rmallon@gmail.com> Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2014-04-03 21:47:56 +00:00
case LRU_REMOVED_RETRY:
fallthrough;
list: add a new LRU list type Several subsystems use the same construct for LRU lists - a list head, a spin lock and and item count. They also use exactly the same code for adding and removing items from the LRU. Create a generic type for these LRU lists. This is the beginning of generic, node aware LRUs for shrinkers to work with. [glommer@openvz.org: enum defined constants for lru. Suggested by gthelen, don't relock over retry] Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <glommer@openvz.org> Reviewed-by: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com> Acked-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com> Cc: Arve Hjønnevåg <arve@android.com> Cc: Carlos Maiolino <cmaiolino@redhat.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com> Cc: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com> Cc: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Cc: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com> Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org> Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> Cc: Kent Overstreet <koverstreet@google.com> Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Cc: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com> Cc: Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@vmware.com> Cc: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2013-08-28 00:17:58 +00:00
case LRU_REMOVED:
list_lru: per-node list infrastructure Now that we have an LRU list API, we can start to enhance the implementation. This splits the single LRU list into per-node lists and locks to enhance scalability. Items are placed on lists according to the node the memory belongs to. To make scanning the lists efficient, also track whether the per-node lists have entries in them in a active nodemask. Note: We use a fixed-size array for the node LRU, this struct can be very big if MAX_NUMNODES is big. If this becomes a problem this is fixable by turning this into a pointer and dynamically allocating this to nr_node_ids. This quantity is firwmare-provided, and still would provide room for all nodes at the cost of a pointer lookup and an extra allocation. Because that allocation will most likely come from a may very well fail. [glommer@openvz.org: fix warnings, added note about node lru] Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <glommer@openvz.org> Reviewed-by: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com> Acked-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com> Cc: Arve Hjønnevåg <arve@android.com> Cc: Carlos Maiolino <cmaiolino@redhat.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com> Cc: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com> Cc: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Cc: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com> Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org> Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> Cc: Kent Overstreet <koverstreet@google.com> Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Cc: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com> Cc: Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@vmware.com> Cc: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2013-08-28 00:18:00 +00:00
isolated++;
mm/list_lru: split the lock to per-cgroup scope Currently, every list_lru has a per-node lock that protects adding, deletion, isolation, and reparenting of all list_lru_one instances belonging to this list_lru on this node. This lock contention is heavy when multiple cgroups modify the same list_lru. This lock can be split into per-cgroup scope to reduce contention. To achieve this, we need a stable list_lru_one for every cgroup. This commit adds a lock to each list_lru_one and introduced a helper function lock_list_lru_of_memcg, making it possible to pin the list_lru of a memcg. Then reworked the reparenting process. Reparenting will switch the list_lru_one instances one by one. By locking each instance and marking it dead using the nr_items counter, reparenting ensures that all items in the corresponding cgroup (on-list or not, because items have a stable cgroup, see below) will see the list_lru_one switch synchronously. Objcg reparent is also moved after list_lru reparent so items will have a stable mem cgroup until all list_lru_one instances are drained. The only caller that doesn't work the *_obj interfaces are direct calls to list_lru_{add,del}. But it's only used by zswap and that's also based on objcg, so it's fine. This also changes the bahaviour of the isolation function when LRU_RETRY or LRU_REMOVED_RETRY is returned, because now releasing the lock could unblock reparenting and free the list_lru_one, isolation function will have to return withoug re-lock the lru. prepare() { mkdir /tmp/test-fs modprobe brd rd_nr=1 rd_size=33554432 mkfs.xfs -f /dev/ram0 mount -t xfs /dev/ram0 /tmp/test-fs for i in $(seq 1 512); do mkdir "/tmp/test-fs/$i" for j in $(seq 1 10240); do echo TEST-CONTENT > "/tmp/test-fs/$i/$j" done & done; wait } do_test() { read_worker() { sleep 1 tar -cv "$1" &>/dev/null } read_in_all() { cd "/tmp/test-fs" && ls for i in $(seq 1 512); do (exec sh -c 'echo "$PPID"') > "/sys/fs/cgroup/benchmark/$i/cgroup.procs" read_worker "$i" & done; wait } for i in $(seq 1 512); do mkdir -p "/sys/fs/cgroup/benchmark/$i" done echo +memory > /sys/fs/cgroup/benchmark/cgroup.subtree_control echo 512M > /sys/fs/cgroup/benchmark/memory.max echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches time read_in_all } Above script simulates compression of small files in multiple cgroups with memory pressure. Run prepare() then do_test for 6 times: Before: real 0m7.762s user 0m11.340s sys 3m11.224s real 0m8.123s user 0m11.548s sys 3m2.549s real 0m7.736s user 0m11.515s sys 3m11.171s real 0m8.539s user 0m11.508s sys 3m7.618s real 0m7.928s user 0m11.349s sys 3m13.063s real 0m8.105s user 0m11.128s sys 3m14.313s After this commit (about ~15% faster): real 0m6.953s user 0m11.327s sys 2m42.912s real 0m7.453s user 0m11.343s sys 2m51.942s real 0m6.916s user 0m11.269s sys 2m43.957s real 0m6.894s user 0m11.528s sys 2m45.346s real 0m6.911s user 0m11.095s sys 2m43.168s real 0m6.773s user 0m11.518s sys 2m40.774s Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241104175257.60853-6-ryncsn@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Kairui Song <kasong@tencent.com> Cc: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@bytedance.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev> Cc: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com> Cc: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev> Cc: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-11-04 17:52:56 +00:00
atomic_long_dec(&nlru->nr_items);
mm: keep page cache radix tree nodes in check Previously, page cache radix tree nodes were freed after reclaim emptied out their page pointers. But now reclaim stores shadow entries in their place, which are only reclaimed when the inodes themselves are reclaimed. This is problematic for bigger files that are still in use after they have a significant amount of their cache reclaimed, without any of those pages actually refaulting. The shadow entries will just sit there and waste memory. In the worst case, the shadow entries will accumulate until the machine runs out of memory. To get this under control, the VM will track radix tree nodes exclusively containing shadow entries on a per-NUMA node list. Per-NUMA rather than global because we expect the radix tree nodes themselves to be allocated node-locally and we want to reduce cross-node references of otherwise independent cache workloads. A simple shrinker will then reclaim these nodes on memory pressure. A few things need to be stored in the radix tree node to implement the shadow node LRU and allow tree deletions coming from the list: 1. There is no index available that would describe the reverse path from the node up to the tree root, which is needed to perform a deletion. To solve this, encode in each node its offset inside the parent. This can be stored in the unused upper bits of the same member that stores the node's height at no extra space cost. 2. The number of shadow entries needs to be counted in addition to the regular entries, to quickly detect when the node is ready to go to the shadow node LRU list. The current entry count is an unsigned int but the maximum number of entries is 64, so a shadow counter can easily be stored in the unused upper bits. 3. Tree modification needs tree lock and tree root, which are located in the address space, so store an address_space backpointer in the node. The parent pointer of the node is in a union with the 2-word rcu_head, so the backpointer comes at no extra cost as well. 4. The node needs to be linked to an LRU list, which requires a list head inside the node. This does increase the size of the node, but it does not change the number of objects that fit into a slab page. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: export the right function] Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Reviewed-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org> Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> Cc: Bob Liu <bob.liu@oracle.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> Cc: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> Cc: Luigi Semenzato <semenzato@google.com> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Cc: Metin Doslu <metin@citusdata.com> Cc: Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com> Cc: Ozgun Erdogan <ozgun@citusdata.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Roman Gushchin <klamm@yandex-team.ru> Cc: Ryan Mallon <rmallon@gmail.com> Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2014-04-03 21:47:56 +00:00
if (ret == LRU_REMOVED_RETRY)
goto restart;
list: add a new LRU list type Several subsystems use the same construct for LRU lists - a list head, a spin lock and and item count. They also use exactly the same code for adding and removing items from the LRU. Create a generic type for these LRU lists. This is the beginning of generic, node aware LRUs for shrinkers to work with. [glommer@openvz.org: enum defined constants for lru. Suggested by gthelen, don't relock over retry] Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <glommer@openvz.org> Reviewed-by: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com> Acked-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com> Cc: Arve Hjønnevåg <arve@android.com> Cc: Carlos Maiolino <cmaiolino@redhat.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com> Cc: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com> Cc: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Cc: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com> Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org> Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> Cc: Kent Overstreet <koverstreet@google.com> Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Cc: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com> Cc: Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@vmware.com> Cc: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2013-08-28 00:17:58 +00:00
break;
case LRU_ROTATE:
list_lru: introduce per-memcg lists There are several FS shrinkers, including super_block::s_shrink, that keep reclaimable objects in the list_lru structure. Hence to turn them to memcg-aware shrinkers, it is enough to make list_lru per-memcg. This patch does the trick. It adds an array of lru lists to the list_lru_node structure (per-node part of the list_lru), one for each kmem-active memcg, and dispatches every item addition or removal to the list corresponding to the memcg which the item is accounted to. So now the list_lru structure is not just per node, but per node and per memcg. Not all list_lrus need this feature, so this patch also adds a new method, list_lru_init_memcg, which initializes a list_lru as memcg aware. Otherwise (i.e. if initialized with old list_lru_init), the list_lru won't have per memcg lists. Just like per memcg caches arrays, the arrays of per-memcg lists are indexed by memcg_cache_id, so we must grow them whenever memcg_nr_cache_ids is increased. So we introduce a callback, memcg_update_all_list_lrus, invoked by memcg_alloc_cache_id if the id space is full. The locking is implemented in a manner similar to lruvecs, i.e. we have one lock per node that protects all lists (both global and per cgroup) on the node. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@parallels.com> Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz> Cc: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com> Cc: Glauber Costa <glommer@gmail.com> Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com> Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2015-02-12 22:59:10 +00:00
list_move_tail(item, &l->list);
list: add a new LRU list type Several subsystems use the same construct for LRU lists - a list head, a spin lock and and item count. They also use exactly the same code for adding and removing items from the LRU. Create a generic type for these LRU lists. This is the beginning of generic, node aware LRUs for shrinkers to work with. [glommer@openvz.org: enum defined constants for lru. Suggested by gthelen, don't relock over retry] Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <glommer@openvz.org> Reviewed-by: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com> Acked-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com> Cc: Arve Hjønnevåg <arve@android.com> Cc: Carlos Maiolino <cmaiolino@redhat.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com> Cc: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com> Cc: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Cc: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com> Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org> Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> Cc: Kent Overstreet <koverstreet@google.com> Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Cc: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com> Cc: Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@vmware.com> Cc: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2013-08-28 00:17:58 +00:00
break;
case LRU_SKIP:
break;
case LRU_STOP:
goto out;
list: add a new LRU list type Several subsystems use the same construct for LRU lists - a list head, a spin lock and and item count. They also use exactly the same code for adding and removing items from the LRU. Create a generic type for these LRU lists. This is the beginning of generic, node aware LRUs for shrinkers to work with. [glommer@openvz.org: enum defined constants for lru. Suggested by gthelen, don't relock over retry] Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <glommer@openvz.org> Reviewed-by: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com> Acked-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com> Cc: Arve Hjønnevåg <arve@android.com> Cc: Carlos Maiolino <cmaiolino@redhat.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com> Cc: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com> Cc: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Cc: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com> Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org> Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> Cc: Kent Overstreet <koverstreet@google.com> Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Cc: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com> Cc: Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@vmware.com> Cc: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2013-08-28 00:17:58 +00:00
default:
BUG();
}
}
mm/list_lru: split the lock to per-cgroup scope Currently, every list_lru has a per-node lock that protects adding, deletion, isolation, and reparenting of all list_lru_one instances belonging to this list_lru on this node. This lock contention is heavy when multiple cgroups modify the same list_lru. This lock can be split into per-cgroup scope to reduce contention. To achieve this, we need a stable list_lru_one for every cgroup. This commit adds a lock to each list_lru_one and introduced a helper function lock_list_lru_of_memcg, making it possible to pin the list_lru of a memcg. Then reworked the reparenting process. Reparenting will switch the list_lru_one instances one by one. By locking each instance and marking it dead using the nr_items counter, reparenting ensures that all items in the corresponding cgroup (on-list or not, because items have a stable cgroup, see below) will see the list_lru_one switch synchronously. Objcg reparent is also moved after list_lru reparent so items will have a stable mem cgroup until all list_lru_one instances are drained. The only caller that doesn't work the *_obj interfaces are direct calls to list_lru_{add,del}. But it's only used by zswap and that's also based on objcg, so it's fine. This also changes the bahaviour of the isolation function when LRU_RETRY or LRU_REMOVED_RETRY is returned, because now releasing the lock could unblock reparenting and free the list_lru_one, isolation function will have to return withoug re-lock the lru. prepare() { mkdir /tmp/test-fs modprobe brd rd_nr=1 rd_size=33554432 mkfs.xfs -f /dev/ram0 mount -t xfs /dev/ram0 /tmp/test-fs for i in $(seq 1 512); do mkdir "/tmp/test-fs/$i" for j in $(seq 1 10240); do echo TEST-CONTENT > "/tmp/test-fs/$i/$j" done & done; wait } do_test() { read_worker() { sleep 1 tar -cv "$1" &>/dev/null } read_in_all() { cd "/tmp/test-fs" && ls for i in $(seq 1 512); do (exec sh -c 'echo "$PPID"') > "/sys/fs/cgroup/benchmark/$i/cgroup.procs" read_worker "$i" & done; wait } for i in $(seq 1 512); do mkdir -p "/sys/fs/cgroup/benchmark/$i" done echo +memory > /sys/fs/cgroup/benchmark/cgroup.subtree_control echo 512M > /sys/fs/cgroup/benchmark/memory.max echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches time read_in_all } Above script simulates compression of small files in multiple cgroups with memory pressure. Run prepare() then do_test for 6 times: Before: real 0m7.762s user 0m11.340s sys 3m11.224s real 0m8.123s user 0m11.548s sys 3m2.549s real 0m7.736s user 0m11.515s sys 3m11.171s real 0m8.539s user 0m11.508s sys 3m7.618s real 0m7.928s user 0m11.349s sys 3m13.063s real 0m8.105s user 0m11.128s sys 3m14.313s After this commit (about ~15% faster): real 0m6.953s user 0m11.327s sys 2m42.912s real 0m7.453s user 0m11.343s sys 2m51.942s real 0m6.916s user 0m11.269s sys 2m43.957s real 0m6.894s user 0m11.528s sys 2m45.346s real 0m6.911s user 0m11.095s sys 2m43.168s real 0m6.773s user 0m11.518s sys 2m40.774s Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241104175257.60853-6-ryncsn@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Kairui Song <kasong@tencent.com> Cc: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@bytedance.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev> Cc: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com> Cc: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev> Cc: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-11-04 17:52:56 +00:00
unlock_list_lru(l, irq_off);
mm: list_lru: allocate list_lru_one only when needed In our server, we found a suspected memory leak problem. The kmalloc-32 consumes more than 6GB of memory. Other kmem_caches consume less than 2GB memory. After our in-depth analysis, the memory consumption of kmalloc-32 slab cache is the cause of list_lru_one allocation. crash> p memcg_nr_cache_ids memcg_nr_cache_ids = $2 = 24574 memcg_nr_cache_ids is very large and memory consumption of each list_lru can be calculated with the following formula. num_numa_node * memcg_nr_cache_ids * 32 (kmalloc-32) There are 4 numa nodes in our system, so each list_lru consumes ~3MB. crash> list super_blocks | wc -l 952 Every mount will register 2 list lrus, one is for inode, another is for dentry. There are 952 super_blocks. So the total memory is 952 * 2 * 3 MB (~5.6GB). But the number of memory cgroup is less than 500. So I guess more than 12286 containers have been deployed on this machine (I do not know why there are so many containers, it may be a user's bug or the user really want to do that). And memcg_nr_cache_ids has not been reduced to a suitable value. This can waste a lot of memory. Now the infrastructure for dynamic list_lru_one allocation is ready, so remove statically allocated memory code to save memory. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220228122126.37293-11-songmuchun@bytedance.com Signed-off-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com> Cc: Alex Shi <alexs@kernel.org> Cc: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com> Cc: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org> Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> Cc: Fam Zheng <fam.zheng@bytedance.com> Cc: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Kari Argillander <kari.argillander@gmail.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> Cc: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com> Cc: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com> Cc: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com> Cc: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com> Cc: Xiongchun Duan <duanxiongchun@bytedance.com> Cc: Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2022-03-22 21:41:19 +00:00
out:
list_lru: per-node list infrastructure Now that we have an LRU list API, we can start to enhance the implementation. This splits the single LRU list into per-node lists and locks to enhance scalability. Items are placed on lists according to the node the memory belongs to. To make scanning the lists efficient, also track whether the per-node lists have entries in them in a active nodemask. Note: We use a fixed-size array for the node LRU, this struct can be very big if MAX_NUMNODES is big. If this becomes a problem this is fixable by turning this into a pointer and dynamically allocating this to nr_node_ids. This quantity is firwmare-provided, and still would provide room for all nodes at the cost of a pointer lookup and an extra allocation. Because that allocation will most likely come from a may very well fail. [glommer@openvz.org: fix warnings, added note about node lru] Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <glommer@openvz.org> Reviewed-by: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com> Acked-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com> Cc: Arve Hjønnevåg <arve@android.com> Cc: Carlos Maiolino <cmaiolino@redhat.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com> Cc: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com> Cc: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Cc: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com> Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org> Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> Cc: Kent Overstreet <koverstreet@google.com> Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Cc: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com> Cc: Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@vmware.com> Cc: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2013-08-28 00:18:00 +00:00
return isolated;
}
list_lru: introduce per-memcg lists There are several FS shrinkers, including super_block::s_shrink, that keep reclaimable objects in the list_lru structure. Hence to turn them to memcg-aware shrinkers, it is enough to make list_lru per-memcg. This patch does the trick. It adds an array of lru lists to the list_lru_node structure (per-node part of the list_lru), one for each kmem-active memcg, and dispatches every item addition or removal to the list corresponding to the memcg which the item is accounted to. So now the list_lru structure is not just per node, but per node and per memcg. Not all list_lrus need this feature, so this patch also adds a new method, list_lru_init_memcg, which initializes a list_lru as memcg aware. Otherwise (i.e. if initialized with old list_lru_init), the list_lru won't have per memcg lists. Just like per memcg caches arrays, the arrays of per-memcg lists are indexed by memcg_cache_id, so we must grow them whenever memcg_nr_cache_ids is increased. So we introduce a callback, memcg_update_all_list_lrus, invoked by memcg_alloc_cache_id if the id space is full. The locking is implemented in a manner similar to lruvecs, i.e. we have one lock per node that protects all lists (both global and per cgroup) on the node. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@parallels.com> Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz> Cc: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com> Cc: Glauber Costa <glommer@gmail.com> Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com> Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2015-02-12 22:59:10 +00:00
unsigned long
list_lru_walk_one(struct list_lru *lru, int nid, struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
list_lru_walk_cb isolate, void *cb_arg,
unsigned long *nr_to_walk)
{
mm/list_lru: split the lock to per-cgroup scope Currently, every list_lru has a per-node lock that protects adding, deletion, isolation, and reparenting of all list_lru_one instances belonging to this list_lru on this node. This lock contention is heavy when multiple cgroups modify the same list_lru. This lock can be split into per-cgroup scope to reduce contention. To achieve this, we need a stable list_lru_one for every cgroup. This commit adds a lock to each list_lru_one and introduced a helper function lock_list_lru_of_memcg, making it possible to pin the list_lru of a memcg. Then reworked the reparenting process. Reparenting will switch the list_lru_one instances one by one. By locking each instance and marking it dead using the nr_items counter, reparenting ensures that all items in the corresponding cgroup (on-list or not, because items have a stable cgroup, see below) will see the list_lru_one switch synchronously. Objcg reparent is also moved after list_lru reparent so items will have a stable mem cgroup until all list_lru_one instances are drained. The only caller that doesn't work the *_obj interfaces are direct calls to list_lru_{add,del}. But it's only used by zswap and that's also based on objcg, so it's fine. This also changes the bahaviour of the isolation function when LRU_RETRY or LRU_REMOVED_RETRY is returned, because now releasing the lock could unblock reparenting and free the list_lru_one, isolation function will have to return withoug re-lock the lru. prepare() { mkdir /tmp/test-fs modprobe brd rd_nr=1 rd_size=33554432 mkfs.xfs -f /dev/ram0 mount -t xfs /dev/ram0 /tmp/test-fs for i in $(seq 1 512); do mkdir "/tmp/test-fs/$i" for j in $(seq 1 10240); do echo TEST-CONTENT > "/tmp/test-fs/$i/$j" done & done; wait } do_test() { read_worker() { sleep 1 tar -cv "$1" &>/dev/null } read_in_all() { cd "/tmp/test-fs" && ls for i in $(seq 1 512); do (exec sh -c 'echo "$PPID"') > "/sys/fs/cgroup/benchmark/$i/cgroup.procs" read_worker "$i" & done; wait } for i in $(seq 1 512); do mkdir -p "/sys/fs/cgroup/benchmark/$i" done echo +memory > /sys/fs/cgroup/benchmark/cgroup.subtree_control echo 512M > /sys/fs/cgroup/benchmark/memory.max echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches time read_in_all } Above script simulates compression of small files in multiple cgroups with memory pressure. Run prepare() then do_test for 6 times: Before: real 0m7.762s user 0m11.340s sys 3m11.224s real 0m8.123s user 0m11.548s sys 3m2.549s real 0m7.736s user 0m11.515s sys 3m11.171s real 0m8.539s user 0m11.508s sys 3m7.618s real 0m7.928s user 0m11.349s sys 3m13.063s real 0m8.105s user 0m11.128s sys 3m14.313s After this commit (about ~15% faster): real 0m6.953s user 0m11.327s sys 2m42.912s real 0m7.453s user 0m11.343s sys 2m51.942s real 0m6.916s user 0m11.269s sys 2m43.957s real 0m6.894s user 0m11.528s sys 2m45.346s real 0m6.911s user 0m11.095s sys 2m43.168s real 0m6.773s user 0m11.518s sys 2m40.774s Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241104175257.60853-6-ryncsn@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Kairui Song <kasong@tencent.com> Cc: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@bytedance.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev> Cc: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com> Cc: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev> Cc: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-11-04 17:52:56 +00:00
return __list_lru_walk_one(lru, nid, memcg, isolate,
cb_arg, nr_to_walk, false);
list_lru: introduce per-memcg lists There are several FS shrinkers, including super_block::s_shrink, that keep reclaimable objects in the list_lru structure. Hence to turn them to memcg-aware shrinkers, it is enough to make list_lru per-memcg. This patch does the trick. It adds an array of lru lists to the list_lru_node structure (per-node part of the list_lru), one for each kmem-active memcg, and dispatches every item addition or removal to the list corresponding to the memcg which the item is accounted to. So now the list_lru structure is not just per node, but per node and per memcg. Not all list_lrus need this feature, so this patch also adds a new method, list_lru_init_memcg, which initializes a list_lru as memcg aware. Otherwise (i.e. if initialized with old list_lru_init), the list_lru won't have per memcg lists. Just like per memcg caches arrays, the arrays of per-memcg lists are indexed by memcg_cache_id, so we must grow them whenever memcg_nr_cache_ids is increased. So we introduce a callback, memcg_update_all_list_lrus, invoked by memcg_alloc_cache_id if the id space is full. The locking is implemented in a manner similar to lruvecs, i.e. we have one lock per node that protects all lists (both global and per cgroup) on the node. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@parallels.com> Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz> Cc: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com> Cc: Glauber Costa <glommer@gmail.com> Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com> Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2015-02-12 22:59:10 +00:00
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(list_lru_walk_one);
unsigned long
list_lru_walk_one_irq(struct list_lru *lru, int nid, struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
list_lru_walk_cb isolate, void *cb_arg,
unsigned long *nr_to_walk)
{
mm/list_lru: split the lock to per-cgroup scope Currently, every list_lru has a per-node lock that protects adding, deletion, isolation, and reparenting of all list_lru_one instances belonging to this list_lru on this node. This lock contention is heavy when multiple cgroups modify the same list_lru. This lock can be split into per-cgroup scope to reduce contention. To achieve this, we need a stable list_lru_one for every cgroup. This commit adds a lock to each list_lru_one and introduced a helper function lock_list_lru_of_memcg, making it possible to pin the list_lru of a memcg. Then reworked the reparenting process. Reparenting will switch the list_lru_one instances one by one. By locking each instance and marking it dead using the nr_items counter, reparenting ensures that all items in the corresponding cgroup (on-list or not, because items have a stable cgroup, see below) will see the list_lru_one switch synchronously. Objcg reparent is also moved after list_lru reparent so items will have a stable mem cgroup until all list_lru_one instances are drained. The only caller that doesn't work the *_obj interfaces are direct calls to list_lru_{add,del}. But it's only used by zswap and that's also based on objcg, so it's fine. This also changes the bahaviour of the isolation function when LRU_RETRY or LRU_REMOVED_RETRY is returned, because now releasing the lock could unblock reparenting and free the list_lru_one, isolation function will have to return withoug re-lock the lru. prepare() { mkdir /tmp/test-fs modprobe brd rd_nr=1 rd_size=33554432 mkfs.xfs -f /dev/ram0 mount -t xfs /dev/ram0 /tmp/test-fs for i in $(seq 1 512); do mkdir "/tmp/test-fs/$i" for j in $(seq 1 10240); do echo TEST-CONTENT > "/tmp/test-fs/$i/$j" done & done; wait } do_test() { read_worker() { sleep 1 tar -cv "$1" &>/dev/null } read_in_all() { cd "/tmp/test-fs" && ls for i in $(seq 1 512); do (exec sh -c 'echo "$PPID"') > "/sys/fs/cgroup/benchmark/$i/cgroup.procs" read_worker "$i" & done; wait } for i in $(seq 1 512); do mkdir -p "/sys/fs/cgroup/benchmark/$i" done echo +memory > /sys/fs/cgroup/benchmark/cgroup.subtree_control echo 512M > /sys/fs/cgroup/benchmark/memory.max echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches time read_in_all } Above script simulates compression of small files in multiple cgroups with memory pressure. Run prepare() then do_test for 6 times: Before: real 0m7.762s user 0m11.340s sys 3m11.224s real 0m8.123s user 0m11.548s sys 3m2.549s real 0m7.736s user 0m11.515s sys 3m11.171s real 0m8.539s user 0m11.508s sys 3m7.618s real 0m7.928s user 0m11.349s sys 3m13.063s real 0m8.105s user 0m11.128s sys 3m14.313s After this commit (about ~15% faster): real 0m6.953s user 0m11.327s sys 2m42.912s real 0m7.453s user 0m11.343s sys 2m51.942s real 0m6.916s user 0m11.269s sys 2m43.957s real 0m6.894s user 0m11.528s sys 2m45.346s real 0m6.911s user 0m11.095s sys 2m43.168s real 0m6.773s user 0m11.518s sys 2m40.774s Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241104175257.60853-6-ryncsn@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Kairui Song <kasong@tencent.com> Cc: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@bytedance.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev> Cc: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com> Cc: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev> Cc: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-11-04 17:52:56 +00:00
return __list_lru_walk_one(lru, nid, memcg, isolate,
cb_arg, nr_to_walk, true);
}
list_lru: introduce per-memcg lists There are several FS shrinkers, including super_block::s_shrink, that keep reclaimable objects in the list_lru structure. Hence to turn them to memcg-aware shrinkers, it is enough to make list_lru per-memcg. This patch does the trick. It adds an array of lru lists to the list_lru_node structure (per-node part of the list_lru), one for each kmem-active memcg, and dispatches every item addition or removal to the list corresponding to the memcg which the item is accounted to. So now the list_lru structure is not just per node, but per node and per memcg. Not all list_lrus need this feature, so this patch also adds a new method, list_lru_init_memcg, which initializes a list_lru as memcg aware. Otherwise (i.e. if initialized with old list_lru_init), the list_lru won't have per memcg lists. Just like per memcg caches arrays, the arrays of per-memcg lists are indexed by memcg_cache_id, so we must grow them whenever memcg_nr_cache_ids is increased. So we introduce a callback, memcg_update_all_list_lrus, invoked by memcg_alloc_cache_id if the id space is full. The locking is implemented in a manner similar to lruvecs, i.e. we have one lock per node that protects all lists (both global and per cgroup) on the node. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@parallels.com> Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz> Cc: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com> Cc: Glauber Costa <glommer@gmail.com> Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com> Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2015-02-12 22:59:10 +00:00
unsigned long list_lru_walk_node(struct list_lru *lru, int nid,
list_lru_walk_cb isolate, void *cb_arg,
unsigned long *nr_to_walk)
{
long isolated = 0;
mm/list_lru.c: use list_lru_walk_one() in list_lru_walk_node() Patch series "mm/list_lru: Add list_lru_shrink_walk_irq() and a user". This series removes the local_irq_disable() around list_lru_shrink_walk() (as used by mm/workingset) by adding list_lru_shrink_walk_irq(). Vladimir Davydov preferred this over `irq' argument which I added to struct list_lru. The initial post (of this series) received a Reviewed-by tag by Vladimir Davydov which I added to each patch of the series. The series applies on top of akpm's tree which has Kirill's shrink_slab series and does not clash with it (akpm asked me to wait a week or so and repost it then). I tested the code paths by triggering the OOM-killer via memory over commit and lockdep did not complain (nor did I see any warnings). This patch (of 4): list_lru_walk_node() invokes __list_lru_walk_one() with -1 as the memcg_idx parameter. The same can be achieved by list_lru_walk_one() and passing NULL as memcg argument which then gets converted into -1. This is a preparation step when the spin_lock() function is lifted to the caller of __list_lru_walk_one(). Invoke list_lru_walk_one() instead __list_lru_walk_one() when possible. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180716111921.5365-2-bigeasy@linutronix.de Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> Reviewed-by: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2018-08-17 22:49:45 +00:00
isolated += list_lru_walk_one(lru, nid, NULL, isolate, cb_arg,
nr_to_walk);
mm: list_lru: replace linear array with xarray If we run 10k containers in the system, the size of the list_lru_memcg->lrus can be ~96KB per list_lru. When we decrease the number containers, the size of the array will not be shrinked. It is not scalable. The xarray is a good choice for this case. We can save a lot of memory when there are tens of thousands continers in the system. If we use xarray, we also can remove the logic code of resizing array, which can simplify the code. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: remove unused local] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220228122126.37293-13-songmuchun@bytedance.com Signed-off-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com> Cc: Alex Shi <alexs@kernel.org> Cc: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com> Cc: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org> Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> Cc: Fam Zheng <fam.zheng@bytedance.com> Cc: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Kari Argillander <kari.argillander@gmail.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> Cc: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com> Cc: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com> Cc: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com> Cc: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com> Cc: Xiongchun Duan <duanxiongchun@bytedance.com> Cc: Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2022-03-22 21:41:25 +00:00
#ifdef CONFIG_MEMCG
list_lru: introduce per-memcg lists There are several FS shrinkers, including super_block::s_shrink, that keep reclaimable objects in the list_lru structure. Hence to turn them to memcg-aware shrinkers, it is enough to make list_lru per-memcg. This patch does the trick. It adds an array of lru lists to the list_lru_node structure (per-node part of the list_lru), one for each kmem-active memcg, and dispatches every item addition or removal to the list corresponding to the memcg which the item is accounted to. So now the list_lru structure is not just per node, but per node and per memcg. Not all list_lrus need this feature, so this patch also adds a new method, list_lru_init_memcg, which initializes a list_lru as memcg aware. Otherwise (i.e. if initialized with old list_lru_init), the list_lru won't have per memcg lists. Just like per memcg caches arrays, the arrays of per-memcg lists are indexed by memcg_cache_id, so we must grow them whenever memcg_nr_cache_ids is increased. So we introduce a callback, memcg_update_all_list_lrus, invoked by memcg_alloc_cache_id if the id space is full. The locking is implemented in a manner similar to lruvecs, i.e. we have one lock per node that protects all lists (both global and per cgroup) on the node. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@parallels.com> Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz> Cc: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com> Cc: Glauber Costa <glommer@gmail.com> Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com> Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2015-02-12 22:59:10 +00:00
if (*nr_to_walk > 0 && list_lru_memcg_aware(lru)) {
struct list_lru_memcg *mlru;
mm/list_lru: split the lock to per-cgroup scope Currently, every list_lru has a per-node lock that protects adding, deletion, isolation, and reparenting of all list_lru_one instances belonging to this list_lru on this node. This lock contention is heavy when multiple cgroups modify the same list_lru. This lock can be split into per-cgroup scope to reduce contention. To achieve this, we need a stable list_lru_one for every cgroup. This commit adds a lock to each list_lru_one and introduced a helper function lock_list_lru_of_memcg, making it possible to pin the list_lru of a memcg. Then reworked the reparenting process. Reparenting will switch the list_lru_one instances one by one. By locking each instance and marking it dead using the nr_items counter, reparenting ensures that all items in the corresponding cgroup (on-list or not, because items have a stable cgroup, see below) will see the list_lru_one switch synchronously. Objcg reparent is also moved after list_lru reparent so items will have a stable mem cgroup until all list_lru_one instances are drained. The only caller that doesn't work the *_obj interfaces are direct calls to list_lru_{add,del}. But it's only used by zswap and that's also based on objcg, so it's fine. This also changes the bahaviour of the isolation function when LRU_RETRY or LRU_REMOVED_RETRY is returned, because now releasing the lock could unblock reparenting and free the list_lru_one, isolation function will have to return withoug re-lock the lru. prepare() { mkdir /tmp/test-fs modprobe brd rd_nr=1 rd_size=33554432 mkfs.xfs -f /dev/ram0 mount -t xfs /dev/ram0 /tmp/test-fs for i in $(seq 1 512); do mkdir "/tmp/test-fs/$i" for j in $(seq 1 10240); do echo TEST-CONTENT > "/tmp/test-fs/$i/$j" done & done; wait } do_test() { read_worker() { sleep 1 tar -cv "$1" &>/dev/null } read_in_all() { cd "/tmp/test-fs" && ls for i in $(seq 1 512); do (exec sh -c 'echo "$PPID"') > "/sys/fs/cgroup/benchmark/$i/cgroup.procs" read_worker "$i" & done; wait } for i in $(seq 1 512); do mkdir -p "/sys/fs/cgroup/benchmark/$i" done echo +memory > /sys/fs/cgroup/benchmark/cgroup.subtree_control echo 512M > /sys/fs/cgroup/benchmark/memory.max echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches time read_in_all } Above script simulates compression of small files in multiple cgroups with memory pressure. Run prepare() then do_test for 6 times: Before: real 0m7.762s user 0m11.340s sys 3m11.224s real 0m8.123s user 0m11.548s sys 3m2.549s real 0m7.736s user 0m11.515s sys 3m11.171s real 0m8.539s user 0m11.508s sys 3m7.618s real 0m7.928s user 0m11.349s sys 3m13.063s real 0m8.105s user 0m11.128s sys 3m14.313s After this commit (about ~15% faster): real 0m6.953s user 0m11.327s sys 2m42.912s real 0m7.453s user 0m11.343s sys 2m51.942s real 0m6.916s user 0m11.269s sys 2m43.957s real 0m6.894s user 0m11.528s sys 2m45.346s real 0m6.911s user 0m11.095s sys 2m43.168s real 0m6.773s user 0m11.518s sys 2m40.774s Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241104175257.60853-6-ryncsn@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Kairui Song <kasong@tencent.com> Cc: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@bytedance.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev> Cc: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com> Cc: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev> Cc: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-11-04 17:52:56 +00:00
struct mem_cgroup *memcg;
mm: list_lru: replace linear array with xarray If we run 10k containers in the system, the size of the list_lru_memcg->lrus can be ~96KB per list_lru. When we decrease the number containers, the size of the array will not be shrinked. It is not scalable. The xarray is a good choice for this case. We can save a lot of memory when there are tens of thousands continers in the system. If we use xarray, we also can remove the logic code of resizing array, which can simplify the code. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: remove unused local] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220228122126.37293-13-songmuchun@bytedance.com Signed-off-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com> Cc: Alex Shi <alexs@kernel.org> Cc: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com> Cc: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org> Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> Cc: Fam Zheng <fam.zheng@bytedance.com> Cc: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Kari Argillander <kari.argillander@gmail.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> Cc: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com> Cc: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com> Cc: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com> Cc: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com> Cc: Xiongchun Duan <duanxiongchun@bytedance.com> Cc: Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2022-03-22 21:41:25 +00:00
unsigned long index;
xa_for_each(&lru->xa, index, mlru) {
mm/list_lru: split the lock to per-cgroup scope Currently, every list_lru has a per-node lock that protects adding, deletion, isolation, and reparenting of all list_lru_one instances belonging to this list_lru on this node. This lock contention is heavy when multiple cgroups modify the same list_lru. This lock can be split into per-cgroup scope to reduce contention. To achieve this, we need a stable list_lru_one for every cgroup. This commit adds a lock to each list_lru_one and introduced a helper function lock_list_lru_of_memcg, making it possible to pin the list_lru of a memcg. Then reworked the reparenting process. Reparenting will switch the list_lru_one instances one by one. By locking each instance and marking it dead using the nr_items counter, reparenting ensures that all items in the corresponding cgroup (on-list or not, because items have a stable cgroup, see below) will see the list_lru_one switch synchronously. Objcg reparent is also moved after list_lru reparent so items will have a stable mem cgroup until all list_lru_one instances are drained. The only caller that doesn't work the *_obj interfaces are direct calls to list_lru_{add,del}. But it's only used by zswap and that's also based on objcg, so it's fine. This also changes the bahaviour of the isolation function when LRU_RETRY or LRU_REMOVED_RETRY is returned, because now releasing the lock could unblock reparenting and free the list_lru_one, isolation function will have to return withoug re-lock the lru. prepare() { mkdir /tmp/test-fs modprobe brd rd_nr=1 rd_size=33554432 mkfs.xfs -f /dev/ram0 mount -t xfs /dev/ram0 /tmp/test-fs for i in $(seq 1 512); do mkdir "/tmp/test-fs/$i" for j in $(seq 1 10240); do echo TEST-CONTENT > "/tmp/test-fs/$i/$j" done & done; wait } do_test() { read_worker() { sleep 1 tar -cv "$1" &>/dev/null } read_in_all() { cd "/tmp/test-fs" && ls for i in $(seq 1 512); do (exec sh -c 'echo "$PPID"') > "/sys/fs/cgroup/benchmark/$i/cgroup.procs" read_worker "$i" & done; wait } for i in $(seq 1 512); do mkdir -p "/sys/fs/cgroup/benchmark/$i" done echo +memory > /sys/fs/cgroup/benchmark/cgroup.subtree_control echo 512M > /sys/fs/cgroup/benchmark/memory.max echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches time read_in_all } Above script simulates compression of small files in multiple cgroups with memory pressure. Run prepare() then do_test for 6 times: Before: real 0m7.762s user 0m11.340s sys 3m11.224s real 0m8.123s user 0m11.548s sys 3m2.549s real 0m7.736s user 0m11.515s sys 3m11.171s real 0m8.539s user 0m11.508s sys 3m7.618s real 0m7.928s user 0m11.349s sys 3m13.063s real 0m8.105s user 0m11.128s sys 3m14.313s After this commit (about ~15% faster): real 0m6.953s user 0m11.327s sys 2m42.912s real 0m7.453s user 0m11.343s sys 2m51.942s real 0m6.916s user 0m11.269s sys 2m43.957s real 0m6.894s user 0m11.528s sys 2m45.346s real 0m6.911s user 0m11.095s sys 2m43.168s real 0m6.773s user 0m11.518s sys 2m40.774s Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241104175257.60853-6-ryncsn@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Kairui Song <kasong@tencent.com> Cc: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@bytedance.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev> Cc: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com> Cc: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev> Cc: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-11-04 17:52:56 +00:00
rcu_read_lock();
memcg = mem_cgroup_from_id(index);
if (!mem_cgroup_tryget(memcg)) {
rcu_read_unlock();
continue;
}
rcu_read_unlock();
isolated += __list_lru_walk_one(lru, nid, memcg,
isolate, cb_arg,
mm/list_lru: split the lock to per-cgroup scope Currently, every list_lru has a per-node lock that protects adding, deletion, isolation, and reparenting of all list_lru_one instances belonging to this list_lru on this node. This lock contention is heavy when multiple cgroups modify the same list_lru. This lock can be split into per-cgroup scope to reduce contention. To achieve this, we need a stable list_lru_one for every cgroup. This commit adds a lock to each list_lru_one and introduced a helper function lock_list_lru_of_memcg, making it possible to pin the list_lru of a memcg. Then reworked the reparenting process. Reparenting will switch the list_lru_one instances one by one. By locking each instance and marking it dead using the nr_items counter, reparenting ensures that all items in the corresponding cgroup (on-list or not, because items have a stable cgroup, see below) will see the list_lru_one switch synchronously. Objcg reparent is also moved after list_lru reparent so items will have a stable mem cgroup until all list_lru_one instances are drained. The only caller that doesn't work the *_obj interfaces are direct calls to list_lru_{add,del}. But it's only used by zswap and that's also based on objcg, so it's fine. This also changes the bahaviour of the isolation function when LRU_RETRY or LRU_REMOVED_RETRY is returned, because now releasing the lock could unblock reparenting and free the list_lru_one, isolation function will have to return withoug re-lock the lru. prepare() { mkdir /tmp/test-fs modprobe brd rd_nr=1 rd_size=33554432 mkfs.xfs -f /dev/ram0 mount -t xfs /dev/ram0 /tmp/test-fs for i in $(seq 1 512); do mkdir "/tmp/test-fs/$i" for j in $(seq 1 10240); do echo TEST-CONTENT > "/tmp/test-fs/$i/$j" done & done; wait } do_test() { read_worker() { sleep 1 tar -cv "$1" &>/dev/null } read_in_all() { cd "/tmp/test-fs" && ls for i in $(seq 1 512); do (exec sh -c 'echo "$PPID"') > "/sys/fs/cgroup/benchmark/$i/cgroup.procs" read_worker "$i" & done; wait } for i in $(seq 1 512); do mkdir -p "/sys/fs/cgroup/benchmark/$i" done echo +memory > /sys/fs/cgroup/benchmark/cgroup.subtree_control echo 512M > /sys/fs/cgroup/benchmark/memory.max echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches time read_in_all } Above script simulates compression of small files in multiple cgroups with memory pressure. Run prepare() then do_test for 6 times: Before: real 0m7.762s user 0m11.340s sys 3m11.224s real 0m8.123s user 0m11.548s sys 3m2.549s real 0m7.736s user 0m11.515s sys 3m11.171s real 0m8.539s user 0m11.508s sys 3m7.618s real 0m7.928s user 0m11.349s sys 3m13.063s real 0m8.105s user 0m11.128s sys 3m14.313s After this commit (about ~15% faster): real 0m6.953s user 0m11.327s sys 2m42.912s real 0m7.453s user 0m11.343s sys 2m51.942s real 0m6.916s user 0m11.269s sys 2m43.957s real 0m6.894s user 0m11.528s sys 2m45.346s real 0m6.911s user 0m11.095s sys 2m43.168s real 0m6.773s user 0m11.518s sys 2m40.774s Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241104175257.60853-6-ryncsn@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Kairui Song <kasong@tencent.com> Cc: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@bytedance.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev> Cc: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com> Cc: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev> Cc: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-11-04 17:52:56 +00:00
nr_to_walk, false);
mem_cgroup_put(memcg);
list_lru: introduce per-memcg lists There are several FS shrinkers, including super_block::s_shrink, that keep reclaimable objects in the list_lru structure. Hence to turn them to memcg-aware shrinkers, it is enough to make list_lru per-memcg. This patch does the trick. It adds an array of lru lists to the list_lru_node structure (per-node part of the list_lru), one for each kmem-active memcg, and dispatches every item addition or removal to the list corresponding to the memcg which the item is accounted to. So now the list_lru structure is not just per node, but per node and per memcg. Not all list_lrus need this feature, so this patch also adds a new method, list_lru_init_memcg, which initializes a list_lru as memcg aware. Otherwise (i.e. if initialized with old list_lru_init), the list_lru won't have per memcg lists. Just like per memcg caches arrays, the arrays of per-memcg lists are indexed by memcg_cache_id, so we must grow them whenever memcg_nr_cache_ids is increased. So we introduce a callback, memcg_update_all_list_lrus, invoked by memcg_alloc_cache_id if the id space is full. The locking is implemented in a manner similar to lruvecs, i.e. we have one lock per node that protects all lists (both global and per cgroup) on the node. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@parallels.com> Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz> Cc: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com> Cc: Glauber Costa <glommer@gmail.com> Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com> Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2015-02-12 22:59:10 +00:00
if (*nr_to_walk <= 0)
break;
}
}
mm: list_lru: replace linear array with xarray If we run 10k containers in the system, the size of the list_lru_memcg->lrus can be ~96KB per list_lru. When we decrease the number containers, the size of the array will not be shrinked. It is not scalable. The xarray is a good choice for this case. We can save a lot of memory when there are tens of thousands continers in the system. If we use xarray, we also can remove the logic code of resizing array, which can simplify the code. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: remove unused local] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220228122126.37293-13-songmuchun@bytedance.com Signed-off-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com> Cc: Alex Shi <alexs@kernel.org> Cc: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com> Cc: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org> Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> Cc: Fam Zheng <fam.zheng@bytedance.com> Cc: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Kari Argillander <kari.argillander@gmail.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> Cc: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com> Cc: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com> Cc: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com> Cc: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com> Cc: Xiongchun Duan <duanxiongchun@bytedance.com> Cc: Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2022-03-22 21:41:25 +00:00
#endif
list_lru: introduce per-memcg lists There are several FS shrinkers, including super_block::s_shrink, that keep reclaimable objects in the list_lru structure. Hence to turn them to memcg-aware shrinkers, it is enough to make list_lru per-memcg. This patch does the trick. It adds an array of lru lists to the list_lru_node structure (per-node part of the list_lru), one for each kmem-active memcg, and dispatches every item addition or removal to the list corresponding to the memcg which the item is accounted to. So now the list_lru structure is not just per node, but per node and per memcg. Not all list_lrus need this feature, so this patch also adds a new method, list_lru_init_memcg, which initializes a list_lru as memcg aware. Otherwise (i.e. if initialized with old list_lru_init), the list_lru won't have per memcg lists. Just like per memcg caches arrays, the arrays of per-memcg lists are indexed by memcg_cache_id, so we must grow them whenever memcg_nr_cache_ids is increased. So we introduce a callback, memcg_update_all_list_lrus, invoked by memcg_alloc_cache_id if the id space is full. The locking is implemented in a manner similar to lruvecs, i.e. we have one lock per node that protects all lists (both global and per cgroup) on the node. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@parallels.com> Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz> Cc: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com> Cc: Glauber Costa <glommer@gmail.com> Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com> Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2015-02-12 22:59:10 +00:00
return isolated;
}
list_lru: per-node list infrastructure Now that we have an LRU list API, we can start to enhance the implementation. This splits the single LRU list into per-node lists and locks to enhance scalability. Items are placed on lists according to the node the memory belongs to. To make scanning the lists efficient, also track whether the per-node lists have entries in them in a active nodemask. Note: We use a fixed-size array for the node LRU, this struct can be very big if MAX_NUMNODES is big. If this becomes a problem this is fixable by turning this into a pointer and dynamically allocating this to nr_node_ids. This quantity is firwmare-provided, and still would provide room for all nodes at the cost of a pointer lookup and an extra allocation. Because that allocation will most likely come from a may very well fail. [glommer@openvz.org: fix warnings, added note about node lru] Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <glommer@openvz.org> Reviewed-by: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com> Acked-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com> Cc: Arve Hjønnevåg <arve@android.com> Cc: Carlos Maiolino <cmaiolino@redhat.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com> Cc: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com> Cc: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Cc: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com> Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org> Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> Cc: Kent Overstreet <koverstreet@google.com> Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Cc: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com> Cc: Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@vmware.com> Cc: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2013-08-28 00:18:00 +00:00
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(list_lru_walk_node);
mm/list_lru: split the lock to per-cgroup scope Currently, every list_lru has a per-node lock that protects adding, deletion, isolation, and reparenting of all list_lru_one instances belonging to this list_lru on this node. This lock contention is heavy when multiple cgroups modify the same list_lru. This lock can be split into per-cgroup scope to reduce contention. To achieve this, we need a stable list_lru_one for every cgroup. This commit adds a lock to each list_lru_one and introduced a helper function lock_list_lru_of_memcg, making it possible to pin the list_lru of a memcg. Then reworked the reparenting process. Reparenting will switch the list_lru_one instances one by one. By locking each instance and marking it dead using the nr_items counter, reparenting ensures that all items in the corresponding cgroup (on-list or not, because items have a stable cgroup, see below) will see the list_lru_one switch synchronously. Objcg reparent is also moved after list_lru reparent so items will have a stable mem cgroup until all list_lru_one instances are drained. The only caller that doesn't work the *_obj interfaces are direct calls to list_lru_{add,del}. But it's only used by zswap and that's also based on objcg, so it's fine. This also changes the bahaviour of the isolation function when LRU_RETRY or LRU_REMOVED_RETRY is returned, because now releasing the lock could unblock reparenting and free the list_lru_one, isolation function will have to return withoug re-lock the lru. prepare() { mkdir /tmp/test-fs modprobe brd rd_nr=1 rd_size=33554432 mkfs.xfs -f /dev/ram0 mount -t xfs /dev/ram0 /tmp/test-fs for i in $(seq 1 512); do mkdir "/tmp/test-fs/$i" for j in $(seq 1 10240); do echo TEST-CONTENT > "/tmp/test-fs/$i/$j" done & done; wait } do_test() { read_worker() { sleep 1 tar -cv "$1" &>/dev/null } read_in_all() { cd "/tmp/test-fs" && ls for i in $(seq 1 512); do (exec sh -c 'echo "$PPID"') > "/sys/fs/cgroup/benchmark/$i/cgroup.procs" read_worker "$i" & done; wait } for i in $(seq 1 512); do mkdir -p "/sys/fs/cgroup/benchmark/$i" done echo +memory > /sys/fs/cgroup/benchmark/cgroup.subtree_control echo 512M > /sys/fs/cgroup/benchmark/memory.max echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches time read_in_all } Above script simulates compression of small files in multiple cgroups with memory pressure. Run prepare() then do_test for 6 times: Before: real 0m7.762s user 0m11.340s sys 3m11.224s real 0m8.123s user 0m11.548s sys 3m2.549s real 0m7.736s user 0m11.515s sys 3m11.171s real 0m8.539s user 0m11.508s sys 3m7.618s real 0m7.928s user 0m11.349s sys 3m13.063s real 0m8.105s user 0m11.128s sys 3m14.313s After this commit (about ~15% faster): real 0m6.953s user 0m11.327s sys 2m42.912s real 0m7.453s user 0m11.343s sys 2m51.942s real 0m6.916s user 0m11.269s sys 2m43.957s real 0m6.894s user 0m11.528s sys 2m45.346s real 0m6.911s user 0m11.095s sys 2m43.168s real 0m6.773s user 0m11.518s sys 2m40.774s Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241104175257.60853-6-ryncsn@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Kairui Song <kasong@tencent.com> Cc: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@bytedance.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev> Cc: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com> Cc: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev> Cc: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-11-04 17:52:56 +00:00
static void init_one_lru(struct list_lru *lru, struct list_lru_one *l)
list_lru: introduce per-memcg lists There are several FS shrinkers, including super_block::s_shrink, that keep reclaimable objects in the list_lru structure. Hence to turn them to memcg-aware shrinkers, it is enough to make list_lru per-memcg. This patch does the trick. It adds an array of lru lists to the list_lru_node structure (per-node part of the list_lru), one for each kmem-active memcg, and dispatches every item addition or removal to the list corresponding to the memcg which the item is accounted to. So now the list_lru structure is not just per node, but per node and per memcg. Not all list_lrus need this feature, so this patch also adds a new method, list_lru_init_memcg, which initializes a list_lru as memcg aware. Otherwise (i.e. if initialized with old list_lru_init), the list_lru won't have per memcg lists. Just like per memcg caches arrays, the arrays of per-memcg lists are indexed by memcg_cache_id, so we must grow them whenever memcg_nr_cache_ids is increased. So we introduce a callback, memcg_update_all_list_lrus, invoked by memcg_alloc_cache_id if the id space is full. The locking is implemented in a manner similar to lruvecs, i.e. we have one lock per node that protects all lists (both global and per cgroup) on the node. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@parallels.com> Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz> Cc: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com> Cc: Glauber Costa <glommer@gmail.com> Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com> Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2015-02-12 22:59:10 +00:00
{
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&l->list);
mm/list_lru: split the lock to per-cgroup scope Currently, every list_lru has a per-node lock that protects adding, deletion, isolation, and reparenting of all list_lru_one instances belonging to this list_lru on this node. This lock contention is heavy when multiple cgroups modify the same list_lru. This lock can be split into per-cgroup scope to reduce contention. To achieve this, we need a stable list_lru_one for every cgroup. This commit adds a lock to each list_lru_one and introduced a helper function lock_list_lru_of_memcg, making it possible to pin the list_lru of a memcg. Then reworked the reparenting process. Reparenting will switch the list_lru_one instances one by one. By locking each instance and marking it dead using the nr_items counter, reparenting ensures that all items in the corresponding cgroup (on-list or not, because items have a stable cgroup, see below) will see the list_lru_one switch synchronously. Objcg reparent is also moved after list_lru reparent so items will have a stable mem cgroup until all list_lru_one instances are drained. The only caller that doesn't work the *_obj interfaces are direct calls to list_lru_{add,del}. But it's only used by zswap and that's also based on objcg, so it's fine. This also changes the bahaviour of the isolation function when LRU_RETRY or LRU_REMOVED_RETRY is returned, because now releasing the lock could unblock reparenting and free the list_lru_one, isolation function will have to return withoug re-lock the lru. prepare() { mkdir /tmp/test-fs modprobe brd rd_nr=1 rd_size=33554432 mkfs.xfs -f /dev/ram0 mount -t xfs /dev/ram0 /tmp/test-fs for i in $(seq 1 512); do mkdir "/tmp/test-fs/$i" for j in $(seq 1 10240); do echo TEST-CONTENT > "/tmp/test-fs/$i/$j" done & done; wait } do_test() { read_worker() { sleep 1 tar -cv "$1" &>/dev/null } read_in_all() { cd "/tmp/test-fs" && ls for i in $(seq 1 512); do (exec sh -c 'echo "$PPID"') > "/sys/fs/cgroup/benchmark/$i/cgroup.procs" read_worker "$i" & done; wait } for i in $(seq 1 512); do mkdir -p "/sys/fs/cgroup/benchmark/$i" done echo +memory > /sys/fs/cgroup/benchmark/cgroup.subtree_control echo 512M > /sys/fs/cgroup/benchmark/memory.max echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches time read_in_all } Above script simulates compression of small files in multiple cgroups with memory pressure. Run prepare() then do_test for 6 times: Before: real 0m7.762s user 0m11.340s sys 3m11.224s real 0m8.123s user 0m11.548s sys 3m2.549s real 0m7.736s user 0m11.515s sys 3m11.171s real 0m8.539s user 0m11.508s sys 3m7.618s real 0m7.928s user 0m11.349s sys 3m13.063s real 0m8.105s user 0m11.128s sys 3m14.313s After this commit (about ~15% faster): real 0m6.953s user 0m11.327s sys 2m42.912s real 0m7.453s user 0m11.343s sys 2m51.942s real 0m6.916s user 0m11.269s sys 2m43.957s real 0m6.894s user 0m11.528s sys 2m45.346s real 0m6.911s user 0m11.095s sys 2m43.168s real 0m6.773s user 0m11.518s sys 2m40.774s Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241104175257.60853-6-ryncsn@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Kairui Song <kasong@tencent.com> Cc: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@bytedance.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev> Cc: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com> Cc: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev> Cc: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-11-04 17:52:56 +00:00
spin_lock_init(&l->lock);
list_lru: introduce per-memcg lists There are several FS shrinkers, including super_block::s_shrink, that keep reclaimable objects in the list_lru structure. Hence to turn them to memcg-aware shrinkers, it is enough to make list_lru per-memcg. This patch does the trick. It adds an array of lru lists to the list_lru_node structure (per-node part of the list_lru), one for each kmem-active memcg, and dispatches every item addition or removal to the list corresponding to the memcg which the item is accounted to. So now the list_lru structure is not just per node, but per node and per memcg. Not all list_lrus need this feature, so this patch also adds a new method, list_lru_init_memcg, which initializes a list_lru as memcg aware. Otherwise (i.e. if initialized with old list_lru_init), the list_lru won't have per memcg lists. Just like per memcg caches arrays, the arrays of per-memcg lists are indexed by memcg_cache_id, so we must grow them whenever memcg_nr_cache_ids is increased. So we introduce a callback, memcg_update_all_list_lrus, invoked by memcg_alloc_cache_id if the id space is full. The locking is implemented in a manner similar to lruvecs, i.e. we have one lock per node that protects all lists (both global and per cgroup) on the node. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@parallels.com> Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz> Cc: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com> Cc: Glauber Costa <glommer@gmail.com> Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com> Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2015-02-12 22:59:10 +00:00
l->nr_items = 0;
mm/list_lru: split the lock to per-cgroup scope Currently, every list_lru has a per-node lock that protects adding, deletion, isolation, and reparenting of all list_lru_one instances belonging to this list_lru on this node. This lock contention is heavy when multiple cgroups modify the same list_lru. This lock can be split into per-cgroup scope to reduce contention. To achieve this, we need a stable list_lru_one for every cgroup. This commit adds a lock to each list_lru_one and introduced a helper function lock_list_lru_of_memcg, making it possible to pin the list_lru of a memcg. Then reworked the reparenting process. Reparenting will switch the list_lru_one instances one by one. By locking each instance and marking it dead using the nr_items counter, reparenting ensures that all items in the corresponding cgroup (on-list or not, because items have a stable cgroup, see below) will see the list_lru_one switch synchronously. Objcg reparent is also moved after list_lru reparent so items will have a stable mem cgroup until all list_lru_one instances are drained. The only caller that doesn't work the *_obj interfaces are direct calls to list_lru_{add,del}. But it's only used by zswap and that's also based on objcg, so it's fine. This also changes the bahaviour of the isolation function when LRU_RETRY or LRU_REMOVED_RETRY is returned, because now releasing the lock could unblock reparenting and free the list_lru_one, isolation function will have to return withoug re-lock the lru. prepare() { mkdir /tmp/test-fs modprobe brd rd_nr=1 rd_size=33554432 mkfs.xfs -f /dev/ram0 mount -t xfs /dev/ram0 /tmp/test-fs for i in $(seq 1 512); do mkdir "/tmp/test-fs/$i" for j in $(seq 1 10240); do echo TEST-CONTENT > "/tmp/test-fs/$i/$j" done & done; wait } do_test() { read_worker() { sleep 1 tar -cv "$1" &>/dev/null } read_in_all() { cd "/tmp/test-fs" && ls for i in $(seq 1 512); do (exec sh -c 'echo "$PPID"') > "/sys/fs/cgroup/benchmark/$i/cgroup.procs" read_worker "$i" & done; wait } for i in $(seq 1 512); do mkdir -p "/sys/fs/cgroup/benchmark/$i" done echo +memory > /sys/fs/cgroup/benchmark/cgroup.subtree_control echo 512M > /sys/fs/cgroup/benchmark/memory.max echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches time read_in_all } Above script simulates compression of small files in multiple cgroups with memory pressure. Run prepare() then do_test for 6 times: Before: real 0m7.762s user 0m11.340s sys 3m11.224s real 0m8.123s user 0m11.548s sys 3m2.549s real 0m7.736s user 0m11.515s sys 3m11.171s real 0m8.539s user 0m11.508s sys 3m7.618s real 0m7.928s user 0m11.349s sys 3m13.063s real 0m8.105s user 0m11.128s sys 3m14.313s After this commit (about ~15% faster): real 0m6.953s user 0m11.327s sys 2m42.912s real 0m7.453s user 0m11.343s sys 2m51.942s real 0m6.916s user 0m11.269s sys 2m43.957s real 0m6.894s user 0m11.528s sys 2m45.346s real 0m6.911s user 0m11.095s sys 2m43.168s real 0m6.773s user 0m11.518s sys 2m40.774s Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241104175257.60853-6-ryncsn@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Kairui Song <kasong@tencent.com> Cc: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@bytedance.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev> Cc: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com> Cc: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev> Cc: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-11-04 17:52:56 +00:00
#ifdef CONFIG_LOCKDEP
if (lru->key)
lockdep_set_class(&l->lock, lru->key);
#endif
list_lru: introduce per-memcg lists There are several FS shrinkers, including super_block::s_shrink, that keep reclaimable objects in the list_lru structure. Hence to turn them to memcg-aware shrinkers, it is enough to make list_lru per-memcg. This patch does the trick. It adds an array of lru lists to the list_lru_node structure (per-node part of the list_lru), one for each kmem-active memcg, and dispatches every item addition or removal to the list corresponding to the memcg which the item is accounted to. So now the list_lru structure is not just per node, but per node and per memcg. Not all list_lrus need this feature, so this patch also adds a new method, list_lru_init_memcg, which initializes a list_lru as memcg aware. Otherwise (i.e. if initialized with old list_lru_init), the list_lru won't have per memcg lists. Just like per memcg caches arrays, the arrays of per-memcg lists are indexed by memcg_cache_id, so we must grow them whenever memcg_nr_cache_ids is increased. So we introduce a callback, memcg_update_all_list_lrus, invoked by memcg_alloc_cache_id if the id space is full. The locking is implemented in a manner similar to lruvecs, i.e. we have one lock per node that protects all lists (both global and per cgroup) on the node. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@parallels.com> Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz> Cc: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com> Cc: Glauber Costa <glommer@gmail.com> Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com> Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2015-02-12 22:59:10 +00:00
}
#ifdef CONFIG_MEMCG
mm/list_lru: split the lock to per-cgroup scope Currently, every list_lru has a per-node lock that protects adding, deletion, isolation, and reparenting of all list_lru_one instances belonging to this list_lru on this node. This lock contention is heavy when multiple cgroups modify the same list_lru. This lock can be split into per-cgroup scope to reduce contention. To achieve this, we need a stable list_lru_one for every cgroup. This commit adds a lock to each list_lru_one and introduced a helper function lock_list_lru_of_memcg, making it possible to pin the list_lru of a memcg. Then reworked the reparenting process. Reparenting will switch the list_lru_one instances one by one. By locking each instance and marking it dead using the nr_items counter, reparenting ensures that all items in the corresponding cgroup (on-list or not, because items have a stable cgroup, see below) will see the list_lru_one switch synchronously. Objcg reparent is also moved after list_lru reparent so items will have a stable mem cgroup until all list_lru_one instances are drained. The only caller that doesn't work the *_obj interfaces are direct calls to list_lru_{add,del}. But it's only used by zswap and that's also based on objcg, so it's fine. This also changes the bahaviour of the isolation function when LRU_RETRY or LRU_REMOVED_RETRY is returned, because now releasing the lock could unblock reparenting and free the list_lru_one, isolation function will have to return withoug re-lock the lru. prepare() { mkdir /tmp/test-fs modprobe brd rd_nr=1 rd_size=33554432 mkfs.xfs -f /dev/ram0 mount -t xfs /dev/ram0 /tmp/test-fs for i in $(seq 1 512); do mkdir "/tmp/test-fs/$i" for j in $(seq 1 10240); do echo TEST-CONTENT > "/tmp/test-fs/$i/$j" done & done; wait } do_test() { read_worker() { sleep 1 tar -cv "$1" &>/dev/null } read_in_all() { cd "/tmp/test-fs" && ls for i in $(seq 1 512); do (exec sh -c 'echo "$PPID"') > "/sys/fs/cgroup/benchmark/$i/cgroup.procs" read_worker "$i" & done; wait } for i in $(seq 1 512); do mkdir -p "/sys/fs/cgroup/benchmark/$i" done echo +memory > /sys/fs/cgroup/benchmark/cgroup.subtree_control echo 512M > /sys/fs/cgroup/benchmark/memory.max echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches time read_in_all } Above script simulates compression of small files in multiple cgroups with memory pressure. Run prepare() then do_test for 6 times: Before: real 0m7.762s user 0m11.340s sys 3m11.224s real 0m8.123s user 0m11.548s sys 3m2.549s real 0m7.736s user 0m11.515s sys 3m11.171s real 0m8.539s user 0m11.508s sys 3m7.618s real 0m7.928s user 0m11.349s sys 3m13.063s real 0m8.105s user 0m11.128s sys 3m14.313s After this commit (about ~15% faster): real 0m6.953s user 0m11.327s sys 2m42.912s real 0m7.453s user 0m11.343s sys 2m51.942s real 0m6.916s user 0m11.269s sys 2m43.957s real 0m6.894s user 0m11.528s sys 2m45.346s real 0m6.911s user 0m11.095s sys 2m43.168s real 0m6.773s user 0m11.518s sys 2m40.774s Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241104175257.60853-6-ryncsn@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Kairui Song <kasong@tencent.com> Cc: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@bytedance.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev> Cc: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com> Cc: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev> Cc: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-11-04 17:52:56 +00:00
static struct list_lru_memcg *memcg_init_list_lru_one(struct list_lru *lru, gfp_t gfp)
mm: introduce kmem_cache_alloc_lru We currently allocate scope for every memcg to be able to tracked on every superblock instantiated in the system, regardless of whether that superblock is even accessible to that memcg. These huge memcg counts come from container hosts where memcgs are confined to just a small subset of the total number of superblocks that instantiated at any given point in time. For these systems with huge container counts, list_lru does not need the capability of tracking every memcg on every superblock. What it comes down to is that adding the memcg to the list_lru at the first insert. So introduce kmem_cache_alloc_lru to allocate objects and its list_lru. In the later patch, we will convert all inode and dentry allocation from kmem_cache_alloc to kmem_cache_alloc_lru. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220228122126.37293-3-songmuchun@bytedance.com Signed-off-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com> Cc: Alex Shi <alexs@kernel.org> Cc: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com> Cc: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org> Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> Cc: Fam Zheng <fam.zheng@bytedance.com> Cc: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Kari Argillander <kari.argillander@gmail.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> Cc: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com> Cc: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com> Cc: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com> Cc: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com> Cc: Xiongchun Duan <duanxiongchun@bytedance.com> Cc: Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2022-03-22 21:40:56 +00:00
{
int nid;
struct list_lru_memcg *mlru;
mm: introduce kmem_cache_alloc_lru We currently allocate scope for every memcg to be able to tracked on every superblock instantiated in the system, regardless of whether that superblock is even accessible to that memcg. These huge memcg counts come from container hosts where memcgs are confined to just a small subset of the total number of superblocks that instantiated at any given point in time. For these systems with huge container counts, list_lru does not need the capability of tracking every memcg on every superblock. What it comes down to is that adding the memcg to the list_lru at the first insert. So introduce kmem_cache_alloc_lru to allocate objects and its list_lru. In the later patch, we will convert all inode and dentry allocation from kmem_cache_alloc to kmem_cache_alloc_lru. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220228122126.37293-3-songmuchun@bytedance.com Signed-off-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com> Cc: Alex Shi <alexs@kernel.org> Cc: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com> Cc: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org> Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> Cc: Fam Zheng <fam.zheng@bytedance.com> Cc: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Kari Argillander <kari.argillander@gmail.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> Cc: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com> Cc: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com> Cc: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com> Cc: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com> Cc: Xiongchun Duan <duanxiongchun@bytedance.com> Cc: Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2022-03-22 21:40:56 +00:00
mlru = kmalloc(struct_size(mlru, node, nr_node_ids), gfp);
if (!mlru)
return NULL;
for_each_node(nid)
mm/list_lru: split the lock to per-cgroup scope Currently, every list_lru has a per-node lock that protects adding, deletion, isolation, and reparenting of all list_lru_one instances belonging to this list_lru on this node. This lock contention is heavy when multiple cgroups modify the same list_lru. This lock can be split into per-cgroup scope to reduce contention. To achieve this, we need a stable list_lru_one for every cgroup. This commit adds a lock to each list_lru_one and introduced a helper function lock_list_lru_of_memcg, making it possible to pin the list_lru of a memcg. Then reworked the reparenting process. Reparenting will switch the list_lru_one instances one by one. By locking each instance and marking it dead using the nr_items counter, reparenting ensures that all items in the corresponding cgroup (on-list or not, because items have a stable cgroup, see below) will see the list_lru_one switch synchronously. Objcg reparent is also moved after list_lru reparent so items will have a stable mem cgroup until all list_lru_one instances are drained. The only caller that doesn't work the *_obj interfaces are direct calls to list_lru_{add,del}. But it's only used by zswap and that's also based on objcg, so it's fine. This also changes the bahaviour of the isolation function when LRU_RETRY or LRU_REMOVED_RETRY is returned, because now releasing the lock could unblock reparenting and free the list_lru_one, isolation function will have to return withoug re-lock the lru. prepare() { mkdir /tmp/test-fs modprobe brd rd_nr=1 rd_size=33554432 mkfs.xfs -f /dev/ram0 mount -t xfs /dev/ram0 /tmp/test-fs for i in $(seq 1 512); do mkdir "/tmp/test-fs/$i" for j in $(seq 1 10240); do echo TEST-CONTENT > "/tmp/test-fs/$i/$j" done & done; wait } do_test() { read_worker() { sleep 1 tar -cv "$1" &>/dev/null } read_in_all() { cd "/tmp/test-fs" && ls for i in $(seq 1 512); do (exec sh -c 'echo "$PPID"') > "/sys/fs/cgroup/benchmark/$i/cgroup.procs" read_worker "$i" & done; wait } for i in $(seq 1 512); do mkdir -p "/sys/fs/cgroup/benchmark/$i" done echo +memory > /sys/fs/cgroup/benchmark/cgroup.subtree_control echo 512M > /sys/fs/cgroup/benchmark/memory.max echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches time read_in_all } Above script simulates compression of small files in multiple cgroups with memory pressure. Run prepare() then do_test for 6 times: Before: real 0m7.762s user 0m11.340s sys 3m11.224s real 0m8.123s user 0m11.548s sys 3m2.549s real 0m7.736s user 0m11.515s sys 3m11.171s real 0m8.539s user 0m11.508s sys 3m7.618s real 0m7.928s user 0m11.349s sys 3m13.063s real 0m8.105s user 0m11.128s sys 3m14.313s After this commit (about ~15% faster): real 0m6.953s user 0m11.327s sys 2m42.912s real 0m7.453s user 0m11.343s sys 2m51.942s real 0m6.916s user 0m11.269s sys 2m43.957s real 0m6.894s user 0m11.528s sys 2m45.346s real 0m6.911s user 0m11.095s sys 2m43.168s real 0m6.773s user 0m11.518s sys 2m40.774s Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241104175257.60853-6-ryncsn@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Kairui Song <kasong@tencent.com> Cc: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@bytedance.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev> Cc: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com> Cc: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev> Cc: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-11-04 17:52:56 +00:00
init_one_lru(lru, &mlru->node[nid]);
mm: introduce kmem_cache_alloc_lru We currently allocate scope for every memcg to be able to tracked on every superblock instantiated in the system, regardless of whether that superblock is even accessible to that memcg. These huge memcg counts come from container hosts where memcgs are confined to just a small subset of the total number of superblocks that instantiated at any given point in time. For these systems with huge container counts, list_lru does not need the capability of tracking every memcg on every superblock. What it comes down to is that adding the memcg to the list_lru at the first insert. So introduce kmem_cache_alloc_lru to allocate objects and its list_lru. In the later patch, we will convert all inode and dentry allocation from kmem_cache_alloc to kmem_cache_alloc_lru. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220228122126.37293-3-songmuchun@bytedance.com Signed-off-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com> Cc: Alex Shi <alexs@kernel.org> Cc: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com> Cc: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org> Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> Cc: Fam Zheng <fam.zheng@bytedance.com> Cc: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Kari Argillander <kari.argillander@gmail.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> Cc: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com> Cc: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com> Cc: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com> Cc: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com> Cc: Xiongchun Duan <duanxiongchun@bytedance.com> Cc: Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2022-03-22 21:40:56 +00:00
return mlru;
}
mm: list_lru: replace linear array with xarray If we run 10k containers in the system, the size of the list_lru_memcg->lrus can be ~96KB per list_lru. When we decrease the number containers, the size of the array will not be shrinked. It is not scalable. The xarray is a good choice for this case. We can save a lot of memory when there are tens of thousands continers in the system. If we use xarray, we also can remove the logic code of resizing array, which can simplify the code. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: remove unused local] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220228122126.37293-13-songmuchun@bytedance.com Signed-off-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com> Cc: Alex Shi <alexs@kernel.org> Cc: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com> Cc: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org> Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> Cc: Fam Zheng <fam.zheng@bytedance.com> Cc: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Kari Argillander <kari.argillander@gmail.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> Cc: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com> Cc: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com> Cc: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com> Cc: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com> Cc: Xiongchun Duan <duanxiongchun@bytedance.com> Cc: Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2022-03-22 21:41:25 +00:00
static inline void memcg_init_list_lru(struct list_lru *lru, bool memcg_aware)
list_lru: introduce per-memcg lists There are several FS shrinkers, including super_block::s_shrink, that keep reclaimable objects in the list_lru structure. Hence to turn them to memcg-aware shrinkers, it is enough to make list_lru per-memcg. This patch does the trick. It adds an array of lru lists to the list_lru_node structure (per-node part of the list_lru), one for each kmem-active memcg, and dispatches every item addition or removal to the list corresponding to the memcg which the item is accounted to. So now the list_lru structure is not just per node, but per node and per memcg. Not all list_lrus need this feature, so this patch also adds a new method, list_lru_init_memcg, which initializes a list_lru as memcg aware. Otherwise (i.e. if initialized with old list_lru_init), the list_lru won't have per memcg lists. Just like per memcg caches arrays, the arrays of per-memcg lists are indexed by memcg_cache_id, so we must grow them whenever memcg_nr_cache_ids is increased. So we introduce a callback, memcg_update_all_list_lrus, invoked by memcg_alloc_cache_id if the id space is full. The locking is implemented in a manner similar to lruvecs, i.e. we have one lock per node that protects all lists (both global and per cgroup) on the node. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@parallels.com> Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz> Cc: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com> Cc: Glauber Costa <glommer@gmail.com> Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com> Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2015-02-12 22:59:10 +00:00
{
mm: list_lru: replace linear array with xarray If we run 10k containers in the system, the size of the list_lru_memcg->lrus can be ~96KB per list_lru. When we decrease the number containers, the size of the array will not be shrinked. It is not scalable. The xarray is a good choice for this case. We can save a lot of memory when there are tens of thousands continers in the system. If we use xarray, we also can remove the logic code of resizing array, which can simplify the code. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: remove unused local] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220228122126.37293-13-songmuchun@bytedance.com Signed-off-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com> Cc: Alex Shi <alexs@kernel.org> Cc: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com> Cc: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org> Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> Cc: Fam Zheng <fam.zheng@bytedance.com> Cc: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Kari Argillander <kari.argillander@gmail.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> Cc: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com> Cc: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com> Cc: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com> Cc: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com> Cc: Xiongchun Duan <duanxiongchun@bytedance.com> Cc: Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2022-03-22 21:41:25 +00:00
if (memcg_aware)
xa_init_flags(&lru->xa, XA_FLAGS_LOCK_IRQ);
mm: list_lru: transpose the array of per-node per-memcg lru lists Patch series "Optimize list lru memory consumption", v6. In our server, we found a suspected memory leak problem. The kmalloc-32 consumes more than 6GB of memory. Other kmem_caches consume less than 2GB memory. After our in-depth analysis, the memory consumption of kmalloc-32 slab cache is the cause of list_lru_one allocation. crash> p memcg_nr_cache_ids memcg_nr_cache_ids = $2 = 24574 memcg_nr_cache_ids is very large and memory consumption of each list_lru can be calculated with the following formula. num_numa_node * memcg_nr_cache_ids * 32 (kmalloc-32) There are 4 numa nodes in our system, so each list_lru consumes ~3MB. crash> list super_blocks | wc -l 952 Every mount will register 2 list lrus, one is for inode, another is for dentry. There are 952 super_blocks. So the total memory is 952 * 2 * 3 MB (~5.6GB). But now the number of memory cgroups is less than 500. So I guess more than 12286 memory cgroups have been created on this machine (I do not know why there are so many cgroups, it may be a user's bug or the user really want to do that). Because memcg_nr_cache_ids has not been reduced to a suitable value. It leads to waste a lot of memory. If we want to reduce memcg_nr_cache_ids, we have to *reboot* the server. This is not what we want. In order to reduce memcg_nr_cache_ids, I had posted a patchset [1] to do this. But this did not fundamentally solve the problem. We currently allocate scope for every memcg to be able to tracked on every superblock instantiated in the system, regardless of whether that superblock is even accessible to that memcg. These huge memcg counts come from container hosts where memcgs are confined to just a small subset of the total number of superblocks that instantiated at any given point in time. For these systems with huge container counts, list_lru does not need the capability of tracking every memcg on every superblock. What it comes down to is that the list_lru is only needed for a given memcg if that memcg is instatiating and freeing objects on a given list_lru. As Dave said, "Which makes me think we should be moving more towards 'add the memcg to the list_lru at the first insert' model rather than 'instantiate all at memcg init time just in case'." This patchset aims to optimize the list lru memory consumption from different aspects. I had done a easy test to show the optimization. I create 10k memory cgroups and mount 10k filesystems in the systems. We use free command to show how many memory does the systems comsumes after this operation (There are 2 numa nodes in the system). +-----------------------+------------------------+ | condition | memory consumption | +-----------------------+------------------------+ | without this patchset | 24464 MB | +-----------------------+------------------------+ | after patch 1 | 21957 MB | <--------+ +-----------------------+------------------------+ | | after patch 10 | 6895 MB | | +-----------------------+------------------------+ | | after patch 12 | 4367 MB | | +-----------------------+------------------------+ | | The more the number of nodes, the more obvious the effect---+ BTW, there was a recent discussion [2] on the same issue. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20210428094949.43579-1-songmuchun@bytedance.com/ [2] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20210405054848.GA1077931@in.ibm.com/ This series not only optimizes the memory usage of list_lru but also simplifies the code. This patch (of 16): The current scheme of maintaining per-node per-memcg lru lists looks like: struct list_lru { struct list_lru_node *node; (for each node) struct list_lru_memcg *memcg_lrus; struct list_lru_one *lru[]; (for each memcg) } By effectively transposing the two-dimension array of list_lru_one's structures (per-node per-memcg => per-memcg per-node) it's possible to save some memory and simplify alloc/dealloc paths. The new scheme looks like: struct list_lru { struct list_lru_memcg *mlrus; struct list_lru_per_memcg *mlru[]; (for each memcg) struct list_lru_one node[0]; (for each node) } Memory savings are coming from not only 'struct rcu_head' but also some pointer arrays used to store the pointer to 'struct list_lru_one'. The array is per node and its size is 8 (a pointer) * num_memcgs. So the total size of the arrays is 8 * num_nodes * memcg_nr_cache_ids. After this patch, the size becomes 8 * memcg_nr_cache_ids. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220228122126.37293-1-songmuchun@bytedance.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220228122126.37293-2-songmuchun@bytedance.com Signed-off-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com> Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> Cc: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com> Cc: Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com> Cc: Alex Shi <alexs@kernel.org> Cc: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com> Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> Cc: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com> Cc: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com> Cc: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org> Cc: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org> Cc: Kari Argillander <kari.argillander@gmail.com> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com> Cc: Xiongchun Duan <duanxiongchun@bytedance.com> Cc: Fam Zheng <fam.zheng@bytedance.com> Cc: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev> Cc: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2022-03-22 21:40:53 +00:00
lru->memcg_aware = memcg_aware;
list_lru: introduce per-memcg lists There are several FS shrinkers, including super_block::s_shrink, that keep reclaimable objects in the list_lru structure. Hence to turn them to memcg-aware shrinkers, it is enough to make list_lru per-memcg. This patch does the trick. It adds an array of lru lists to the list_lru_node structure (per-node part of the list_lru), one for each kmem-active memcg, and dispatches every item addition or removal to the list corresponding to the memcg which the item is accounted to. So now the list_lru structure is not just per node, but per node and per memcg. Not all list_lrus need this feature, so this patch also adds a new method, list_lru_init_memcg, which initializes a list_lru as memcg aware. Otherwise (i.e. if initialized with old list_lru_init), the list_lru won't have per memcg lists. Just like per memcg caches arrays, the arrays of per-memcg lists are indexed by memcg_cache_id, so we must grow them whenever memcg_nr_cache_ids is increased. So we introduce a callback, memcg_update_all_list_lrus, invoked by memcg_alloc_cache_id if the id space is full. The locking is implemented in a manner similar to lruvecs, i.e. we have one lock per node that protects all lists (both global and per cgroup) on the node. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@parallels.com> Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz> Cc: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com> Cc: Glauber Costa <glommer@gmail.com> Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com> Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2015-02-12 22:59:10 +00:00
}
mm: list_lru: transpose the array of per-node per-memcg lru lists Patch series "Optimize list lru memory consumption", v6. In our server, we found a suspected memory leak problem. The kmalloc-32 consumes more than 6GB of memory. Other kmem_caches consume less than 2GB memory. After our in-depth analysis, the memory consumption of kmalloc-32 slab cache is the cause of list_lru_one allocation. crash> p memcg_nr_cache_ids memcg_nr_cache_ids = $2 = 24574 memcg_nr_cache_ids is very large and memory consumption of each list_lru can be calculated with the following formula. num_numa_node * memcg_nr_cache_ids * 32 (kmalloc-32) There are 4 numa nodes in our system, so each list_lru consumes ~3MB. crash> list super_blocks | wc -l 952 Every mount will register 2 list lrus, one is for inode, another is for dentry. There are 952 super_blocks. So the total memory is 952 * 2 * 3 MB (~5.6GB). But now the number of memory cgroups is less than 500. So I guess more than 12286 memory cgroups have been created on this machine (I do not know why there are so many cgroups, it may be a user's bug or the user really want to do that). Because memcg_nr_cache_ids has not been reduced to a suitable value. It leads to waste a lot of memory. If we want to reduce memcg_nr_cache_ids, we have to *reboot* the server. This is not what we want. In order to reduce memcg_nr_cache_ids, I had posted a patchset [1] to do this. But this did not fundamentally solve the problem. We currently allocate scope for every memcg to be able to tracked on every superblock instantiated in the system, regardless of whether that superblock is even accessible to that memcg. These huge memcg counts come from container hosts where memcgs are confined to just a small subset of the total number of superblocks that instantiated at any given point in time. For these systems with huge container counts, list_lru does not need the capability of tracking every memcg on every superblock. What it comes down to is that the list_lru is only needed for a given memcg if that memcg is instatiating and freeing objects on a given list_lru. As Dave said, "Which makes me think we should be moving more towards 'add the memcg to the list_lru at the first insert' model rather than 'instantiate all at memcg init time just in case'." This patchset aims to optimize the list lru memory consumption from different aspects. I had done a easy test to show the optimization. I create 10k memory cgroups and mount 10k filesystems in the systems. We use free command to show how many memory does the systems comsumes after this operation (There are 2 numa nodes in the system). +-----------------------+------------------------+ | condition | memory consumption | +-----------------------+------------------------+ | without this patchset | 24464 MB | +-----------------------+------------------------+ | after patch 1 | 21957 MB | <--------+ +-----------------------+------------------------+ | | after patch 10 | 6895 MB | | +-----------------------+------------------------+ | | after patch 12 | 4367 MB | | +-----------------------+------------------------+ | | The more the number of nodes, the more obvious the effect---+ BTW, there was a recent discussion [2] on the same issue. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20210428094949.43579-1-songmuchun@bytedance.com/ [2] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20210405054848.GA1077931@in.ibm.com/ This series not only optimizes the memory usage of list_lru but also simplifies the code. This patch (of 16): The current scheme of maintaining per-node per-memcg lru lists looks like: struct list_lru { struct list_lru_node *node; (for each node) struct list_lru_memcg *memcg_lrus; struct list_lru_one *lru[]; (for each memcg) } By effectively transposing the two-dimension array of list_lru_one's structures (per-node per-memcg => per-memcg per-node) it's possible to save some memory and simplify alloc/dealloc paths. The new scheme looks like: struct list_lru { struct list_lru_memcg *mlrus; struct list_lru_per_memcg *mlru[]; (for each memcg) struct list_lru_one node[0]; (for each node) } Memory savings are coming from not only 'struct rcu_head' but also some pointer arrays used to store the pointer to 'struct list_lru_one'. The array is per node and its size is 8 (a pointer) * num_memcgs. So the total size of the arrays is 8 * num_nodes * memcg_nr_cache_ids. After this patch, the size becomes 8 * memcg_nr_cache_ids. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220228122126.37293-1-songmuchun@bytedance.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220228122126.37293-2-songmuchun@bytedance.com Signed-off-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com> Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> Cc: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com> Cc: Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com> Cc: Alex Shi <alexs@kernel.org> Cc: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com> Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> Cc: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com> Cc: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com> Cc: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org> Cc: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org> Cc: Kari Argillander <kari.argillander@gmail.com> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com> Cc: Xiongchun Duan <duanxiongchun@bytedance.com> Cc: Fam Zheng <fam.zheng@bytedance.com> Cc: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev> Cc: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2022-03-22 21:40:53 +00:00
static void memcg_destroy_list_lru(struct list_lru *lru)
list_lru: introduce per-memcg lists There are several FS shrinkers, including super_block::s_shrink, that keep reclaimable objects in the list_lru structure. Hence to turn them to memcg-aware shrinkers, it is enough to make list_lru per-memcg. This patch does the trick. It adds an array of lru lists to the list_lru_node structure (per-node part of the list_lru), one for each kmem-active memcg, and dispatches every item addition or removal to the list corresponding to the memcg which the item is accounted to. So now the list_lru structure is not just per node, but per node and per memcg. Not all list_lrus need this feature, so this patch also adds a new method, list_lru_init_memcg, which initializes a list_lru as memcg aware. Otherwise (i.e. if initialized with old list_lru_init), the list_lru won't have per memcg lists. Just like per memcg caches arrays, the arrays of per-memcg lists are indexed by memcg_cache_id, so we must grow them whenever memcg_nr_cache_ids is increased. So we introduce a callback, memcg_update_all_list_lrus, invoked by memcg_alloc_cache_id if the id space is full. The locking is implemented in a manner similar to lruvecs, i.e. we have one lock per node that protects all lists (both global and per cgroup) on the node. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@parallels.com> Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz> Cc: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com> Cc: Glauber Costa <glommer@gmail.com> Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com> Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2015-02-12 22:59:10 +00:00
{
mm: list_lru: replace linear array with xarray If we run 10k containers in the system, the size of the list_lru_memcg->lrus can be ~96KB per list_lru. When we decrease the number containers, the size of the array will not be shrinked. It is not scalable. The xarray is a good choice for this case. We can save a lot of memory when there are tens of thousands continers in the system. If we use xarray, we also can remove the logic code of resizing array, which can simplify the code. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: remove unused local] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220228122126.37293-13-songmuchun@bytedance.com Signed-off-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com> Cc: Alex Shi <alexs@kernel.org> Cc: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com> Cc: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org> Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> Cc: Fam Zheng <fam.zheng@bytedance.com> Cc: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Kari Argillander <kari.argillander@gmail.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> Cc: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com> Cc: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com> Cc: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com> Cc: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com> Cc: Xiongchun Duan <duanxiongchun@bytedance.com> Cc: Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2022-03-22 21:41:25 +00:00
XA_STATE(xas, &lru->xa, 0);
struct list_lru_memcg *mlru;
mm: list_lru: transpose the array of per-node per-memcg lru lists Patch series "Optimize list lru memory consumption", v6. In our server, we found a suspected memory leak problem. The kmalloc-32 consumes more than 6GB of memory. Other kmem_caches consume less than 2GB memory. After our in-depth analysis, the memory consumption of kmalloc-32 slab cache is the cause of list_lru_one allocation. crash> p memcg_nr_cache_ids memcg_nr_cache_ids = $2 = 24574 memcg_nr_cache_ids is very large and memory consumption of each list_lru can be calculated with the following formula. num_numa_node * memcg_nr_cache_ids * 32 (kmalloc-32) There are 4 numa nodes in our system, so each list_lru consumes ~3MB. crash> list super_blocks | wc -l 952 Every mount will register 2 list lrus, one is for inode, another is for dentry. There are 952 super_blocks. So the total memory is 952 * 2 * 3 MB (~5.6GB). But now the number of memory cgroups is less than 500. So I guess more than 12286 memory cgroups have been created on this machine (I do not know why there are so many cgroups, it may be a user's bug or the user really want to do that). Because memcg_nr_cache_ids has not been reduced to a suitable value. It leads to waste a lot of memory. If we want to reduce memcg_nr_cache_ids, we have to *reboot* the server. This is not what we want. In order to reduce memcg_nr_cache_ids, I had posted a patchset [1] to do this. But this did not fundamentally solve the problem. We currently allocate scope for every memcg to be able to tracked on every superblock instantiated in the system, regardless of whether that superblock is even accessible to that memcg. These huge memcg counts come from container hosts where memcgs are confined to just a small subset of the total number of superblocks that instantiated at any given point in time. For these systems with huge container counts, list_lru does not need the capability of tracking every memcg on every superblock. What it comes down to is that the list_lru is only needed for a given memcg if that memcg is instatiating and freeing objects on a given list_lru. As Dave said, "Which makes me think we should be moving more towards 'add the memcg to the list_lru at the first insert' model rather than 'instantiate all at memcg init time just in case'." This patchset aims to optimize the list lru memory consumption from different aspects. I had done a easy test to show the optimization. I create 10k memory cgroups and mount 10k filesystems in the systems. We use free command to show how many memory does the systems comsumes after this operation (There are 2 numa nodes in the system). +-----------------------+------------------------+ | condition | memory consumption | +-----------------------+------------------------+ | without this patchset | 24464 MB | +-----------------------+------------------------+ | after patch 1 | 21957 MB | <--------+ +-----------------------+------------------------+ | | after patch 10 | 6895 MB | | +-----------------------+------------------------+ | | after patch 12 | 4367 MB | | +-----------------------+------------------------+ | | The more the number of nodes, the more obvious the effect---+ BTW, there was a recent discussion [2] on the same issue. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20210428094949.43579-1-songmuchun@bytedance.com/ [2] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20210405054848.GA1077931@in.ibm.com/ This series not only optimizes the memory usage of list_lru but also simplifies the code. This patch (of 16): The current scheme of maintaining per-node per-memcg lru lists looks like: struct list_lru { struct list_lru_node *node; (for each node) struct list_lru_memcg *memcg_lrus; struct list_lru_one *lru[]; (for each memcg) } By effectively transposing the two-dimension array of list_lru_one's structures (per-node per-memcg => per-memcg per-node) it's possible to save some memory and simplify alloc/dealloc paths. The new scheme looks like: struct list_lru { struct list_lru_memcg *mlrus; struct list_lru_per_memcg *mlru[]; (for each memcg) struct list_lru_one node[0]; (for each node) } Memory savings are coming from not only 'struct rcu_head' but also some pointer arrays used to store the pointer to 'struct list_lru_one'. The array is per node and its size is 8 (a pointer) * num_memcgs. So the total size of the arrays is 8 * num_nodes * memcg_nr_cache_ids. After this patch, the size becomes 8 * memcg_nr_cache_ids. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220228122126.37293-1-songmuchun@bytedance.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220228122126.37293-2-songmuchun@bytedance.com Signed-off-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com> Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> Cc: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com> Cc: Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com> Cc: Alex Shi <alexs@kernel.org> Cc: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com> Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> Cc: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com> Cc: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com> Cc: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org> Cc: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org> Cc: Kari Argillander <kari.argillander@gmail.com> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com> Cc: Xiongchun Duan <duanxiongchun@bytedance.com> Cc: Fam Zheng <fam.zheng@bytedance.com> Cc: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev> Cc: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2022-03-22 21:40:53 +00:00
if (!list_lru_memcg_aware(lru))
return;
mm: list_lru: replace linear array with xarray If we run 10k containers in the system, the size of the list_lru_memcg->lrus can be ~96KB per list_lru. When we decrease the number containers, the size of the array will not be shrinked. It is not scalable. The xarray is a good choice for this case. We can save a lot of memory when there are tens of thousands continers in the system. If we use xarray, we also can remove the logic code of resizing array, which can simplify the code. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: remove unused local] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220228122126.37293-13-songmuchun@bytedance.com Signed-off-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com> Cc: Alex Shi <alexs@kernel.org> Cc: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com> Cc: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org> Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> Cc: Fam Zheng <fam.zheng@bytedance.com> Cc: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Kari Argillander <kari.argillander@gmail.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> Cc: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com> Cc: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com> Cc: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com> Cc: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com> Cc: Xiongchun Duan <duanxiongchun@bytedance.com> Cc: Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2022-03-22 21:41:25 +00:00
xas_lock_irq(&xas);
xas_for_each(&xas, mlru, ULONG_MAX) {
kfree(mlru);
xas_store(&xas, NULL);
list_lru: introduce per-memcg lists There are several FS shrinkers, including super_block::s_shrink, that keep reclaimable objects in the list_lru structure. Hence to turn them to memcg-aware shrinkers, it is enough to make list_lru per-memcg. This patch does the trick. It adds an array of lru lists to the list_lru_node structure (per-node part of the list_lru), one for each kmem-active memcg, and dispatches every item addition or removal to the list corresponding to the memcg which the item is accounted to. So now the list_lru structure is not just per node, but per node and per memcg. Not all list_lrus need this feature, so this patch also adds a new method, list_lru_init_memcg, which initializes a list_lru as memcg aware. Otherwise (i.e. if initialized with old list_lru_init), the list_lru won't have per memcg lists. Just like per memcg caches arrays, the arrays of per-memcg lists are indexed by memcg_cache_id, so we must grow them whenever memcg_nr_cache_ids is increased. So we introduce a callback, memcg_update_all_list_lrus, invoked by memcg_alloc_cache_id if the id space is full. The locking is implemented in a manner similar to lruvecs, i.e. we have one lock per node that protects all lists (both global and per cgroup) on the node. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@parallels.com> Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz> Cc: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com> Cc: Glauber Costa <glommer@gmail.com> Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com> Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2015-02-12 22:59:10 +00:00
}
mm: list_lru: replace linear array with xarray If we run 10k containers in the system, the size of the list_lru_memcg->lrus can be ~96KB per list_lru. When we decrease the number containers, the size of the array will not be shrinked. It is not scalable. The xarray is a good choice for this case. We can save a lot of memory when there are tens of thousands continers in the system. If we use xarray, we also can remove the logic code of resizing array, which can simplify the code. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: remove unused local] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220228122126.37293-13-songmuchun@bytedance.com Signed-off-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com> Cc: Alex Shi <alexs@kernel.org> Cc: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com> Cc: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org> Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> Cc: Fam Zheng <fam.zheng@bytedance.com> Cc: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Kari Argillander <kari.argillander@gmail.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> Cc: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com> Cc: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com> Cc: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com> Cc: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com> Cc: Xiongchun Duan <duanxiongchun@bytedance.com> Cc: Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2022-03-22 21:41:25 +00:00
xas_unlock_irq(&xas);
list_lru: introduce per-memcg lists There are several FS shrinkers, including super_block::s_shrink, that keep reclaimable objects in the list_lru structure. Hence to turn them to memcg-aware shrinkers, it is enough to make list_lru per-memcg. This patch does the trick. It adds an array of lru lists to the list_lru_node structure (per-node part of the list_lru), one for each kmem-active memcg, and dispatches every item addition or removal to the list corresponding to the memcg which the item is accounted to. So now the list_lru structure is not just per node, but per node and per memcg. Not all list_lrus need this feature, so this patch also adds a new method, list_lru_init_memcg, which initializes a list_lru as memcg aware. Otherwise (i.e. if initialized with old list_lru_init), the list_lru won't have per memcg lists. Just like per memcg caches arrays, the arrays of per-memcg lists are indexed by memcg_cache_id, so we must grow them whenever memcg_nr_cache_ids is increased. So we introduce a callback, memcg_update_all_list_lrus, invoked by memcg_alloc_cache_id if the id space is full. The locking is implemented in a manner similar to lruvecs, i.e. we have one lock per node that protects all lists (both global and per cgroup) on the node. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@parallels.com> Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz> Cc: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com> Cc: Glauber Costa <glommer@gmail.com> Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com> Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2015-02-12 22:59:10 +00:00
}
mm/list_lru: split the lock to per-cgroup scope Currently, every list_lru has a per-node lock that protects adding, deletion, isolation, and reparenting of all list_lru_one instances belonging to this list_lru on this node. This lock contention is heavy when multiple cgroups modify the same list_lru. This lock can be split into per-cgroup scope to reduce contention. To achieve this, we need a stable list_lru_one for every cgroup. This commit adds a lock to each list_lru_one and introduced a helper function lock_list_lru_of_memcg, making it possible to pin the list_lru of a memcg. Then reworked the reparenting process. Reparenting will switch the list_lru_one instances one by one. By locking each instance and marking it dead using the nr_items counter, reparenting ensures that all items in the corresponding cgroup (on-list or not, because items have a stable cgroup, see below) will see the list_lru_one switch synchronously. Objcg reparent is also moved after list_lru reparent so items will have a stable mem cgroup until all list_lru_one instances are drained. The only caller that doesn't work the *_obj interfaces are direct calls to list_lru_{add,del}. But it's only used by zswap and that's also based on objcg, so it's fine. This also changes the bahaviour of the isolation function when LRU_RETRY or LRU_REMOVED_RETRY is returned, because now releasing the lock could unblock reparenting and free the list_lru_one, isolation function will have to return withoug re-lock the lru. prepare() { mkdir /tmp/test-fs modprobe brd rd_nr=1 rd_size=33554432 mkfs.xfs -f /dev/ram0 mount -t xfs /dev/ram0 /tmp/test-fs for i in $(seq 1 512); do mkdir "/tmp/test-fs/$i" for j in $(seq 1 10240); do echo TEST-CONTENT > "/tmp/test-fs/$i/$j" done & done; wait } do_test() { read_worker() { sleep 1 tar -cv "$1" &>/dev/null } read_in_all() { cd "/tmp/test-fs" && ls for i in $(seq 1 512); do (exec sh -c 'echo "$PPID"') > "/sys/fs/cgroup/benchmark/$i/cgroup.procs" read_worker "$i" & done; wait } for i in $(seq 1 512); do mkdir -p "/sys/fs/cgroup/benchmark/$i" done echo +memory > /sys/fs/cgroup/benchmark/cgroup.subtree_control echo 512M > /sys/fs/cgroup/benchmark/memory.max echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches time read_in_all } Above script simulates compression of small files in multiple cgroups with memory pressure. Run prepare() then do_test for 6 times: Before: real 0m7.762s user 0m11.340s sys 3m11.224s real 0m8.123s user 0m11.548s sys 3m2.549s real 0m7.736s user 0m11.515s sys 3m11.171s real 0m8.539s user 0m11.508s sys 3m7.618s real 0m7.928s user 0m11.349s sys 3m13.063s real 0m8.105s user 0m11.128s sys 3m14.313s After this commit (about ~15% faster): real 0m6.953s user 0m11.327s sys 2m42.912s real 0m7.453s user 0m11.343s sys 2m51.942s real 0m6.916s user 0m11.269s sys 2m43.957s real 0m6.894s user 0m11.528s sys 2m45.346s real 0m6.911s user 0m11.095s sys 2m43.168s real 0m6.773s user 0m11.518s sys 2m40.774s Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241104175257.60853-6-ryncsn@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Kairui Song <kasong@tencent.com> Cc: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@bytedance.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev> Cc: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com> Cc: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev> Cc: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-11-04 17:52:56 +00:00
static void memcg_reparent_list_lru_one(struct list_lru *lru, int nid,
struct list_lru_one *src,
struct mem_cgroup *dst_memcg)
{
mm/list_lru: split the lock to per-cgroup scope Currently, every list_lru has a per-node lock that protects adding, deletion, isolation, and reparenting of all list_lru_one instances belonging to this list_lru on this node. This lock contention is heavy when multiple cgroups modify the same list_lru. This lock can be split into per-cgroup scope to reduce contention. To achieve this, we need a stable list_lru_one for every cgroup. This commit adds a lock to each list_lru_one and introduced a helper function lock_list_lru_of_memcg, making it possible to pin the list_lru of a memcg. Then reworked the reparenting process. Reparenting will switch the list_lru_one instances one by one. By locking each instance and marking it dead using the nr_items counter, reparenting ensures that all items in the corresponding cgroup (on-list or not, because items have a stable cgroup, see below) will see the list_lru_one switch synchronously. Objcg reparent is also moved after list_lru reparent so items will have a stable mem cgroup until all list_lru_one instances are drained. The only caller that doesn't work the *_obj interfaces are direct calls to list_lru_{add,del}. But it's only used by zswap and that's also based on objcg, so it's fine. This also changes the bahaviour of the isolation function when LRU_RETRY or LRU_REMOVED_RETRY is returned, because now releasing the lock could unblock reparenting and free the list_lru_one, isolation function will have to return withoug re-lock the lru. prepare() { mkdir /tmp/test-fs modprobe brd rd_nr=1 rd_size=33554432 mkfs.xfs -f /dev/ram0 mount -t xfs /dev/ram0 /tmp/test-fs for i in $(seq 1 512); do mkdir "/tmp/test-fs/$i" for j in $(seq 1 10240); do echo TEST-CONTENT > "/tmp/test-fs/$i/$j" done & done; wait } do_test() { read_worker() { sleep 1 tar -cv "$1" &>/dev/null } read_in_all() { cd "/tmp/test-fs" && ls for i in $(seq 1 512); do (exec sh -c 'echo "$PPID"') > "/sys/fs/cgroup/benchmark/$i/cgroup.procs" read_worker "$i" & done; wait } for i in $(seq 1 512); do mkdir -p "/sys/fs/cgroup/benchmark/$i" done echo +memory > /sys/fs/cgroup/benchmark/cgroup.subtree_control echo 512M > /sys/fs/cgroup/benchmark/memory.max echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches time read_in_all } Above script simulates compression of small files in multiple cgroups with memory pressure. Run prepare() then do_test for 6 times: Before: real 0m7.762s user 0m11.340s sys 3m11.224s real 0m8.123s user 0m11.548s sys 3m2.549s real 0m7.736s user 0m11.515s sys 3m11.171s real 0m8.539s user 0m11.508s sys 3m7.618s real 0m7.928s user 0m11.349s sys 3m13.063s real 0m8.105s user 0m11.128s sys 3m14.313s After this commit (about ~15% faster): real 0m6.953s user 0m11.327s sys 2m42.912s real 0m7.453s user 0m11.343s sys 2m51.942s real 0m6.916s user 0m11.269s sys 2m43.957s real 0m6.894s user 0m11.528s sys 2m45.346s real 0m6.911s user 0m11.095s sys 2m43.168s real 0m6.773s user 0m11.518s sys 2m40.774s Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241104175257.60853-6-ryncsn@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Kairui Song <kasong@tencent.com> Cc: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@bytedance.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev> Cc: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com> Cc: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev> Cc: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-11-04 17:52:56 +00:00
int dst_idx = dst_memcg->kmemcg_id;
mm/list_lru: simplify reparenting and initial allocation Currently, there is a lot of code for detecting reparent racing using kmemcg_id as the synchronization flag. And an intermediate table is required to record and compare the kmemcg_id. We can simplify this by just checking the cgroup css status, skip if cgroup is being offlined. On the reparenting side, ensure no more allocation is on going and no further allocation will occur by using the XArray lock as barrier. Combined with a O(n^2) top-down walk for the allocation, we get rid of the intermediate table allocation completely. Despite being O(n^2), it should be actually faster because it's not practical to have a very deep cgroup level, and in most cases the parent cgroup should have been allocated already. This also avoided changing kmemcg_id before reparenting, making cgroups have a stable index for list_lru_memcg. After this change it's possible that a dying cgroup will see a NULL value in XArray corresponding to the kmemcg_id, because the kmemcg_id will point to an empty slot. In such case, just fallback to use its parent. As a result the code is simpler, following test also showed a very slight performance gain (12 test runs): prepare() { mkdir /tmp/test-fs modprobe brd rd_nr=1 rd_size=16777216 mkfs.xfs -f /dev/ram0 mount -t xfs /dev/ram0 /tmp/test-fs for i in $(seq 10000); do seq 8000 > "/tmp/test-fs/$i" done mkdir -p /sys/fs/cgroup/system.slice/bench/test/1 echo +memory > /sys/fs/cgroup/system.slice/bench/cgroup.subtree_control echo +memory > /sys/fs/cgroup/system.slice/bench/test/cgroup.subtree_control echo +memory > /sys/fs/cgroup/system.slice/bench/test/1/cgroup.subtree_control echo 768M > /sys/fs/cgroup/system.slice/bench/memory.max } do_test() { read_worker() { mkdir -p "/sys/fs/cgroup/system.slice/bench/test/1/$1" echo $BASHPID > "/sys/fs/cgroup/system.slice/bench/test/1/$1/cgroup.procs" read -r __TMP < "/tmp/test-fs/$1"; } read_in_all() { for i in $(seq 10000); do read_worker "$i" & done; wait } echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches time read_in_all for i in $(seq 1 10000); do rmdir "/sys/fs/cgroup/system.slice/bench/test/1/$i" &>/dev/null done } Before: real 0m3.498s user 0m11.037s sys 0m35.872s real 1m33.860s user 0m11.593s sys 3m1.169s real 1m31.883s user 0m11.265s sys 2m59.198s real 1m32.394s user 0m11.294s sys 3m1.616s real 1m31.017s user 0m11.379s sys 3m1.349s real 1m31.931s user 0m11.295s sys 2m59.863s real 1m32.758s user 0m11.254s sys 2m59.538s real 1m35.198s user 0m11.145s sys 3m1.123s real 1m30.531s user 0m11.393s sys 2m58.089s real 1m31.142s user 0m11.333s sys 3m0.549s After: real 0m3.489s user 0m10.943s sys 0m36.036s real 1m10.893s user 0m11.495s sys 2m38.545s real 1m29.129s user 0m11.382s sys 3m1.601s real 1m29.944s user 0m11.494s sys 3m1.575s real 1m31.208s user 0m11.451s sys 2m59.693s real 1m25.944s user 0m11.327s sys 2m56.394s real 1m28.599s user 0m11.312s sys 3m0.162s real 1m26.746s user 0m11.538s sys 2m55.462s real 1m30.668s user 0m11.475s sys 3m2.075s real 1m29.258s user 0m11.292s sys 3m0.780s Which is slightly faster in real time. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241104175257.60853-5-ryncsn@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Kairui Song <kasong@tencent.com> Cc: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@bytedance.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev> Cc: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com> Cc: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev> Cc: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-11-04 17:52:55 +00:00
struct list_lru_one *dst;
mm/list_lru: split the lock to per-cgroup scope Currently, every list_lru has a per-node lock that protects adding, deletion, isolation, and reparenting of all list_lru_one instances belonging to this list_lru on this node. This lock contention is heavy when multiple cgroups modify the same list_lru. This lock can be split into per-cgroup scope to reduce contention. To achieve this, we need a stable list_lru_one for every cgroup. This commit adds a lock to each list_lru_one and introduced a helper function lock_list_lru_of_memcg, making it possible to pin the list_lru of a memcg. Then reworked the reparenting process. Reparenting will switch the list_lru_one instances one by one. By locking each instance and marking it dead using the nr_items counter, reparenting ensures that all items in the corresponding cgroup (on-list or not, because items have a stable cgroup, see below) will see the list_lru_one switch synchronously. Objcg reparent is also moved after list_lru reparent so items will have a stable mem cgroup until all list_lru_one instances are drained. The only caller that doesn't work the *_obj interfaces are direct calls to list_lru_{add,del}. But it's only used by zswap and that's also based on objcg, so it's fine. This also changes the bahaviour of the isolation function when LRU_RETRY or LRU_REMOVED_RETRY is returned, because now releasing the lock could unblock reparenting and free the list_lru_one, isolation function will have to return withoug re-lock the lru. prepare() { mkdir /tmp/test-fs modprobe brd rd_nr=1 rd_size=33554432 mkfs.xfs -f /dev/ram0 mount -t xfs /dev/ram0 /tmp/test-fs for i in $(seq 1 512); do mkdir "/tmp/test-fs/$i" for j in $(seq 1 10240); do echo TEST-CONTENT > "/tmp/test-fs/$i/$j" done & done; wait } do_test() { read_worker() { sleep 1 tar -cv "$1" &>/dev/null } read_in_all() { cd "/tmp/test-fs" && ls for i in $(seq 1 512); do (exec sh -c 'echo "$PPID"') > "/sys/fs/cgroup/benchmark/$i/cgroup.procs" read_worker "$i" & done; wait } for i in $(seq 1 512); do mkdir -p "/sys/fs/cgroup/benchmark/$i" done echo +memory > /sys/fs/cgroup/benchmark/cgroup.subtree_control echo 512M > /sys/fs/cgroup/benchmark/memory.max echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches time read_in_all } Above script simulates compression of small files in multiple cgroups with memory pressure. Run prepare() then do_test for 6 times: Before: real 0m7.762s user 0m11.340s sys 3m11.224s real 0m8.123s user 0m11.548s sys 3m2.549s real 0m7.736s user 0m11.515s sys 3m11.171s real 0m8.539s user 0m11.508s sys 3m7.618s real 0m7.928s user 0m11.349s sys 3m13.063s real 0m8.105s user 0m11.128s sys 3m14.313s After this commit (about ~15% faster): real 0m6.953s user 0m11.327s sys 2m42.912s real 0m7.453s user 0m11.343s sys 2m51.942s real 0m6.916s user 0m11.269s sys 2m43.957s real 0m6.894s user 0m11.528s sys 2m45.346s real 0m6.911s user 0m11.095s sys 2m43.168s real 0m6.773s user 0m11.518s sys 2m40.774s Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241104175257.60853-6-ryncsn@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Kairui Song <kasong@tencent.com> Cc: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@bytedance.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev> Cc: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com> Cc: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev> Cc: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-11-04 17:52:56 +00:00
spin_lock_irq(&src->lock);
dst = list_lru_from_memcg_idx(lru, nid, dst_idx);
spin_lock_nested(&dst->lock, SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING);
list_splice_init(&src->list, &dst->list);
mm: list_lru: set shrinker map bit when child nr_items is not zero When investigating a slab cache bloat problem, significant amount of negative dentry cache was seen, but confusingly they neither got shrunk by reclaimer (the host has very tight memory) nor be shrunk by dropping cache. The vmcore shows there are over 14M negative dentry objects on lru, but tracing result shows they were even not scanned at all. Further investigation shows the memcg's vfs shrinker_map bit is not set. So the reclaimer or dropping cache just skip calling vfs shrinker. So we have to reboot the hosts to get the memory back. I didn't manage to come up with a reproducer in test environment, and the problem can't be reproduced after rebooting. But it seems there is race between shrinker map bit clear and reparenting by code inspection. The hypothesis is elaborated as below. The memcg hierarchy on our production environment looks like: root / \ system user The main workloads are running under user slice's children, and it creates and removes memcg frequently. So reparenting happens very often under user slice, but no task is under user slice directly. So with the frequent reparenting and tight memory pressure, the below hypothetical race condition may happen: CPU A CPU B reparent dst->nr_items == 0 shrinker: total_objects == 0 add src->nr_items to dst set_bit return SHRINK_EMPTY clear_bit child memcg offline replace child's kmemcg_id with parent's (in memcg_offline_kmem()) list_lru_del() between shrinker runs see parent's kmemcg_id dec dst->nr_items reparent again dst->nr_items may go negative due to concurrent list_lru_del() The second run of shrinker: read nr_items without any synchronization, so it may see intermediate negative nr_items then total_objects may return 0 coincidently keep the bit cleared dst->nr_items != 0 skip set_bit add scr->nr_item to dst After this point dst->nr_item may never go zero, so reparenting will not set shrinker_map bit anymore. And since there is no task under user slice directly, so no new object will be added to its lru to set the shrinker map bit either. That bit is kept cleared forever. How does list_lru_del() race with reparenting? It is because reparenting replaces children's kmemcg_id to parent's without protecting from nlru->lock, so list_lru_del() may see parent's kmemcg_id but actually deleting items from child's lru, but dec'ing parent's nr_items, so the parent's nr_items may go negative as commit 2788cf0c401c ("memcg: reparent list_lrus and free kmemcg_id on css offline") says. Since it is impossible that dst->nr_items goes negative and src->nr_items goes zero at the same time, so it seems we could set the shrinker map bit iff src->nr_items != 0. We could synchronize list_lru_count_one() and reparenting with nlru->lock, but it seems checking src->nr_items in reparenting is the simplest and avoids lock contention. Fixes: fae91d6d8be5 ("mm/list_lru.c: set bit in memcg shrinker bitmap on first list_lru item appearance") Suggested-by: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Reviewed-by: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com> Reviewed-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com> Acked-by: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@virtuozzo.com> Cc: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> [4.19] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201202171749.264354-1-shy828301@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-12-06 06:14:48 +00:00
if (src->nr_items) {
dst->nr_items += src->nr_items;
set_shrinker_bit(dst_memcg, nid, lru_shrinker_id(lru));
mm: list_lru: set shrinker map bit when child nr_items is not zero When investigating a slab cache bloat problem, significant amount of negative dentry cache was seen, but confusingly they neither got shrunk by reclaimer (the host has very tight memory) nor be shrunk by dropping cache. The vmcore shows there are over 14M negative dentry objects on lru, but tracing result shows they were even not scanned at all. Further investigation shows the memcg's vfs shrinker_map bit is not set. So the reclaimer or dropping cache just skip calling vfs shrinker. So we have to reboot the hosts to get the memory back. I didn't manage to come up with a reproducer in test environment, and the problem can't be reproduced after rebooting. But it seems there is race between shrinker map bit clear and reparenting by code inspection. The hypothesis is elaborated as below. The memcg hierarchy on our production environment looks like: root / \ system user The main workloads are running under user slice's children, and it creates and removes memcg frequently. So reparenting happens very often under user slice, but no task is under user slice directly. So with the frequent reparenting and tight memory pressure, the below hypothetical race condition may happen: CPU A CPU B reparent dst->nr_items == 0 shrinker: total_objects == 0 add src->nr_items to dst set_bit return SHRINK_EMPTY clear_bit child memcg offline replace child's kmemcg_id with parent's (in memcg_offline_kmem()) list_lru_del() between shrinker runs see parent's kmemcg_id dec dst->nr_items reparent again dst->nr_items may go negative due to concurrent list_lru_del() The second run of shrinker: read nr_items without any synchronization, so it may see intermediate negative nr_items then total_objects may return 0 coincidently keep the bit cleared dst->nr_items != 0 skip set_bit add scr->nr_item to dst After this point dst->nr_item may never go zero, so reparenting will not set shrinker_map bit anymore. And since there is no task under user slice directly, so no new object will be added to its lru to set the shrinker map bit either. That bit is kept cleared forever. How does list_lru_del() race with reparenting? It is because reparenting replaces children's kmemcg_id to parent's without protecting from nlru->lock, so list_lru_del() may see parent's kmemcg_id but actually deleting items from child's lru, but dec'ing parent's nr_items, so the parent's nr_items may go negative as commit 2788cf0c401c ("memcg: reparent list_lrus and free kmemcg_id on css offline") says. Since it is impossible that dst->nr_items goes negative and src->nr_items goes zero at the same time, so it seems we could set the shrinker map bit iff src->nr_items != 0. We could synchronize list_lru_count_one() and reparenting with nlru->lock, but it seems checking src->nr_items in reparenting is the simplest and avoids lock contention. Fixes: fae91d6d8be5 ("mm/list_lru.c: set bit in memcg shrinker bitmap on first list_lru item appearance") Suggested-by: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Reviewed-by: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com> Reviewed-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com> Acked-by: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@virtuozzo.com> Cc: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> [4.19] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201202171749.264354-1-shy828301@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2020-12-06 06:14:48 +00:00
}
mm/list_lru: split the lock to per-cgroup scope Currently, every list_lru has a per-node lock that protects adding, deletion, isolation, and reparenting of all list_lru_one instances belonging to this list_lru on this node. This lock contention is heavy when multiple cgroups modify the same list_lru. This lock can be split into per-cgroup scope to reduce contention. To achieve this, we need a stable list_lru_one for every cgroup. This commit adds a lock to each list_lru_one and introduced a helper function lock_list_lru_of_memcg, making it possible to pin the list_lru of a memcg. Then reworked the reparenting process. Reparenting will switch the list_lru_one instances one by one. By locking each instance and marking it dead using the nr_items counter, reparenting ensures that all items in the corresponding cgroup (on-list or not, because items have a stable cgroup, see below) will see the list_lru_one switch synchronously. Objcg reparent is also moved after list_lru reparent so items will have a stable mem cgroup until all list_lru_one instances are drained. The only caller that doesn't work the *_obj interfaces are direct calls to list_lru_{add,del}. But it's only used by zswap and that's also based on objcg, so it's fine. This also changes the bahaviour of the isolation function when LRU_RETRY or LRU_REMOVED_RETRY is returned, because now releasing the lock could unblock reparenting and free the list_lru_one, isolation function will have to return withoug re-lock the lru. prepare() { mkdir /tmp/test-fs modprobe brd rd_nr=1 rd_size=33554432 mkfs.xfs -f /dev/ram0 mount -t xfs /dev/ram0 /tmp/test-fs for i in $(seq 1 512); do mkdir "/tmp/test-fs/$i" for j in $(seq 1 10240); do echo TEST-CONTENT > "/tmp/test-fs/$i/$j" done & done; wait } do_test() { read_worker() { sleep 1 tar -cv "$1" &>/dev/null } read_in_all() { cd "/tmp/test-fs" && ls for i in $(seq 1 512); do (exec sh -c 'echo "$PPID"') > "/sys/fs/cgroup/benchmark/$i/cgroup.procs" read_worker "$i" & done; wait } for i in $(seq 1 512); do mkdir -p "/sys/fs/cgroup/benchmark/$i" done echo +memory > /sys/fs/cgroup/benchmark/cgroup.subtree_control echo 512M > /sys/fs/cgroup/benchmark/memory.max echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches time read_in_all } Above script simulates compression of small files in multiple cgroups with memory pressure. Run prepare() then do_test for 6 times: Before: real 0m7.762s user 0m11.340s sys 3m11.224s real 0m8.123s user 0m11.548s sys 3m2.549s real 0m7.736s user 0m11.515s sys 3m11.171s real 0m8.539s user 0m11.508s sys 3m7.618s real 0m7.928s user 0m11.349s sys 3m13.063s real 0m8.105s user 0m11.128s sys 3m14.313s After this commit (about ~15% faster): real 0m6.953s user 0m11.327s sys 2m42.912s real 0m7.453s user 0m11.343s sys 2m51.942s real 0m6.916s user 0m11.269s sys 2m43.957s real 0m6.894s user 0m11.528s sys 2m45.346s real 0m6.911s user 0m11.095s sys 2m43.168s real 0m6.773s user 0m11.518s sys 2m40.774s Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241104175257.60853-6-ryncsn@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Kairui Song <kasong@tencent.com> Cc: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@bytedance.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev> Cc: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com> Cc: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev> Cc: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-11-04 17:52:56 +00:00
/* Mark the list_lru_one dead */
src->nr_items = LONG_MIN;
spin_unlock(&dst->lock);
spin_unlock_irq(&src->lock);
}
void memcg_reparent_list_lrus(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, struct mem_cgroup *parent)
{
struct list_lru *lru;
mm/list_lru: simplify reparenting and initial allocation Currently, there is a lot of code for detecting reparent racing using kmemcg_id as the synchronization flag. And an intermediate table is required to record and compare the kmemcg_id. We can simplify this by just checking the cgroup css status, skip if cgroup is being offlined. On the reparenting side, ensure no more allocation is on going and no further allocation will occur by using the XArray lock as barrier. Combined with a O(n^2) top-down walk for the allocation, we get rid of the intermediate table allocation completely. Despite being O(n^2), it should be actually faster because it's not practical to have a very deep cgroup level, and in most cases the parent cgroup should have been allocated already. This also avoided changing kmemcg_id before reparenting, making cgroups have a stable index for list_lru_memcg. After this change it's possible that a dying cgroup will see a NULL value in XArray corresponding to the kmemcg_id, because the kmemcg_id will point to an empty slot. In such case, just fallback to use its parent. As a result the code is simpler, following test also showed a very slight performance gain (12 test runs): prepare() { mkdir /tmp/test-fs modprobe brd rd_nr=1 rd_size=16777216 mkfs.xfs -f /dev/ram0 mount -t xfs /dev/ram0 /tmp/test-fs for i in $(seq 10000); do seq 8000 > "/tmp/test-fs/$i" done mkdir -p /sys/fs/cgroup/system.slice/bench/test/1 echo +memory > /sys/fs/cgroup/system.slice/bench/cgroup.subtree_control echo +memory > /sys/fs/cgroup/system.slice/bench/test/cgroup.subtree_control echo +memory > /sys/fs/cgroup/system.slice/bench/test/1/cgroup.subtree_control echo 768M > /sys/fs/cgroup/system.slice/bench/memory.max } do_test() { read_worker() { mkdir -p "/sys/fs/cgroup/system.slice/bench/test/1/$1" echo $BASHPID > "/sys/fs/cgroup/system.slice/bench/test/1/$1/cgroup.procs" read -r __TMP < "/tmp/test-fs/$1"; } read_in_all() { for i in $(seq 10000); do read_worker "$i" & done; wait } echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches time read_in_all for i in $(seq 1 10000); do rmdir "/sys/fs/cgroup/system.slice/bench/test/1/$i" &>/dev/null done } Before: real 0m3.498s user 0m11.037s sys 0m35.872s real 1m33.860s user 0m11.593s sys 3m1.169s real 1m31.883s user 0m11.265s sys 2m59.198s real 1m32.394s user 0m11.294s sys 3m1.616s real 1m31.017s user 0m11.379s sys 3m1.349s real 1m31.931s user 0m11.295s sys 2m59.863s real 1m32.758s user 0m11.254s sys 2m59.538s real 1m35.198s user 0m11.145s sys 3m1.123s real 1m30.531s user 0m11.393s sys 2m58.089s real 1m31.142s user 0m11.333s sys 3m0.549s After: real 0m3.489s user 0m10.943s sys 0m36.036s real 1m10.893s user 0m11.495s sys 2m38.545s real 1m29.129s user 0m11.382s sys 3m1.601s real 1m29.944s user 0m11.494s sys 3m1.575s real 1m31.208s user 0m11.451s sys 2m59.693s real 1m25.944s user 0m11.327s sys 2m56.394s real 1m28.599s user 0m11.312s sys 3m0.162s real 1m26.746s user 0m11.538s sys 2m55.462s real 1m30.668s user 0m11.475s sys 3m2.075s real 1m29.258s user 0m11.292s sys 3m0.780s Which is slightly faster in real time. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241104175257.60853-5-ryncsn@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Kairui Song <kasong@tencent.com> Cc: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@bytedance.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev> Cc: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com> Cc: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev> Cc: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-11-04 17:52:55 +00:00
int i;
mutex_lock(&list_lrus_mutex);
list_for_each_entry(lru, &memcg_list_lrus, list) {
mm/list_lru: simplify reparenting and initial allocation Currently, there is a lot of code for detecting reparent racing using kmemcg_id as the synchronization flag. And an intermediate table is required to record and compare the kmemcg_id. We can simplify this by just checking the cgroup css status, skip if cgroup is being offlined. On the reparenting side, ensure no more allocation is on going and no further allocation will occur by using the XArray lock as barrier. Combined with a O(n^2) top-down walk for the allocation, we get rid of the intermediate table allocation completely. Despite being O(n^2), it should be actually faster because it's not practical to have a very deep cgroup level, and in most cases the parent cgroup should have been allocated already. This also avoided changing kmemcg_id before reparenting, making cgroups have a stable index for list_lru_memcg. After this change it's possible that a dying cgroup will see a NULL value in XArray corresponding to the kmemcg_id, because the kmemcg_id will point to an empty slot. In such case, just fallback to use its parent. As a result the code is simpler, following test also showed a very slight performance gain (12 test runs): prepare() { mkdir /tmp/test-fs modprobe brd rd_nr=1 rd_size=16777216 mkfs.xfs -f /dev/ram0 mount -t xfs /dev/ram0 /tmp/test-fs for i in $(seq 10000); do seq 8000 > "/tmp/test-fs/$i" done mkdir -p /sys/fs/cgroup/system.slice/bench/test/1 echo +memory > /sys/fs/cgroup/system.slice/bench/cgroup.subtree_control echo +memory > /sys/fs/cgroup/system.slice/bench/test/cgroup.subtree_control echo +memory > /sys/fs/cgroup/system.slice/bench/test/1/cgroup.subtree_control echo 768M > /sys/fs/cgroup/system.slice/bench/memory.max } do_test() { read_worker() { mkdir -p "/sys/fs/cgroup/system.slice/bench/test/1/$1" echo $BASHPID > "/sys/fs/cgroup/system.slice/bench/test/1/$1/cgroup.procs" read -r __TMP < "/tmp/test-fs/$1"; } read_in_all() { for i in $(seq 10000); do read_worker "$i" & done; wait } echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches time read_in_all for i in $(seq 1 10000); do rmdir "/sys/fs/cgroup/system.slice/bench/test/1/$i" &>/dev/null done } Before: real 0m3.498s user 0m11.037s sys 0m35.872s real 1m33.860s user 0m11.593s sys 3m1.169s real 1m31.883s user 0m11.265s sys 2m59.198s real 1m32.394s user 0m11.294s sys 3m1.616s real 1m31.017s user 0m11.379s sys 3m1.349s real 1m31.931s user 0m11.295s sys 2m59.863s real 1m32.758s user 0m11.254s sys 2m59.538s real 1m35.198s user 0m11.145s sys 3m1.123s real 1m30.531s user 0m11.393s sys 2m58.089s real 1m31.142s user 0m11.333s sys 3m0.549s After: real 0m3.489s user 0m10.943s sys 0m36.036s real 1m10.893s user 0m11.495s sys 2m38.545s real 1m29.129s user 0m11.382s sys 3m1.601s real 1m29.944s user 0m11.494s sys 3m1.575s real 1m31.208s user 0m11.451s sys 2m59.693s real 1m25.944s user 0m11.327s sys 2m56.394s real 1m28.599s user 0m11.312s sys 3m0.162s real 1m26.746s user 0m11.538s sys 2m55.462s real 1m30.668s user 0m11.475s sys 3m2.075s real 1m29.258s user 0m11.292s sys 3m0.780s Which is slightly faster in real time. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241104175257.60853-5-ryncsn@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Kairui Song <kasong@tencent.com> Cc: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@bytedance.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev> Cc: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com> Cc: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev> Cc: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-11-04 17:52:55 +00:00
struct list_lru_memcg *mlru;
XA_STATE(xas, &lru->xa, memcg->kmemcg_id);
/*
* Lock the Xarray to ensure no on going list_lru_memcg
* allocation and further allocation will see css_is_dying().
*/
xas_lock_irq(&xas);
mlru = xas_store(&xas, NULL);
xas_unlock_irq(&xas);
if (!mlru)
continue;
/*
* With Xarray value set to NULL, holding the lru lock below
* prevents list_lru_{add,del,isolate} from touching the lru,
* safe to reparent.
*/
for_each_node(i)
mm/list_lru: split the lock to per-cgroup scope Currently, every list_lru has a per-node lock that protects adding, deletion, isolation, and reparenting of all list_lru_one instances belonging to this list_lru on this node. This lock contention is heavy when multiple cgroups modify the same list_lru. This lock can be split into per-cgroup scope to reduce contention. To achieve this, we need a stable list_lru_one for every cgroup. This commit adds a lock to each list_lru_one and introduced a helper function lock_list_lru_of_memcg, making it possible to pin the list_lru of a memcg. Then reworked the reparenting process. Reparenting will switch the list_lru_one instances one by one. By locking each instance and marking it dead using the nr_items counter, reparenting ensures that all items in the corresponding cgroup (on-list or not, because items have a stable cgroup, see below) will see the list_lru_one switch synchronously. Objcg reparent is also moved after list_lru reparent so items will have a stable mem cgroup until all list_lru_one instances are drained. The only caller that doesn't work the *_obj interfaces are direct calls to list_lru_{add,del}. But it's only used by zswap and that's also based on objcg, so it's fine. This also changes the bahaviour of the isolation function when LRU_RETRY or LRU_REMOVED_RETRY is returned, because now releasing the lock could unblock reparenting and free the list_lru_one, isolation function will have to return withoug re-lock the lru. prepare() { mkdir /tmp/test-fs modprobe brd rd_nr=1 rd_size=33554432 mkfs.xfs -f /dev/ram0 mount -t xfs /dev/ram0 /tmp/test-fs for i in $(seq 1 512); do mkdir "/tmp/test-fs/$i" for j in $(seq 1 10240); do echo TEST-CONTENT > "/tmp/test-fs/$i/$j" done & done; wait } do_test() { read_worker() { sleep 1 tar -cv "$1" &>/dev/null } read_in_all() { cd "/tmp/test-fs" && ls for i in $(seq 1 512); do (exec sh -c 'echo "$PPID"') > "/sys/fs/cgroup/benchmark/$i/cgroup.procs" read_worker "$i" & done; wait } for i in $(seq 1 512); do mkdir -p "/sys/fs/cgroup/benchmark/$i" done echo +memory > /sys/fs/cgroup/benchmark/cgroup.subtree_control echo 512M > /sys/fs/cgroup/benchmark/memory.max echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches time read_in_all } Above script simulates compression of small files in multiple cgroups with memory pressure. Run prepare() then do_test for 6 times: Before: real 0m7.762s user 0m11.340s sys 3m11.224s real 0m8.123s user 0m11.548s sys 3m2.549s real 0m7.736s user 0m11.515s sys 3m11.171s real 0m8.539s user 0m11.508s sys 3m7.618s real 0m7.928s user 0m11.349s sys 3m13.063s real 0m8.105s user 0m11.128s sys 3m14.313s After this commit (about ~15% faster): real 0m6.953s user 0m11.327s sys 2m42.912s real 0m7.453s user 0m11.343s sys 2m51.942s real 0m6.916s user 0m11.269s sys 2m43.957s real 0m6.894s user 0m11.528s sys 2m45.346s real 0m6.911s user 0m11.095s sys 2m43.168s real 0m6.773s user 0m11.518s sys 2m40.774s Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241104175257.60853-6-ryncsn@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Kairui Song <kasong@tencent.com> Cc: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@bytedance.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev> Cc: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com> Cc: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev> Cc: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-11-04 17:52:56 +00:00
memcg_reparent_list_lru_one(lru, i, &mlru->node[i], parent);
/*
* Here all list_lrus corresponding to the cgroup are guaranteed
* to remain empty, we can safely free this lru, any further
* memcg_list_lru_alloc() call will simply bail out.
*/
mm/list_lru: simplify reparenting and initial allocation Currently, there is a lot of code for detecting reparent racing using kmemcg_id as the synchronization flag. And an intermediate table is required to record and compare the kmemcg_id. We can simplify this by just checking the cgroup css status, skip if cgroup is being offlined. On the reparenting side, ensure no more allocation is on going and no further allocation will occur by using the XArray lock as barrier. Combined with a O(n^2) top-down walk for the allocation, we get rid of the intermediate table allocation completely. Despite being O(n^2), it should be actually faster because it's not practical to have a very deep cgroup level, and in most cases the parent cgroup should have been allocated already. This also avoided changing kmemcg_id before reparenting, making cgroups have a stable index for list_lru_memcg. After this change it's possible that a dying cgroup will see a NULL value in XArray corresponding to the kmemcg_id, because the kmemcg_id will point to an empty slot. In such case, just fallback to use its parent. As a result the code is simpler, following test also showed a very slight performance gain (12 test runs): prepare() { mkdir /tmp/test-fs modprobe brd rd_nr=1 rd_size=16777216 mkfs.xfs -f /dev/ram0 mount -t xfs /dev/ram0 /tmp/test-fs for i in $(seq 10000); do seq 8000 > "/tmp/test-fs/$i" done mkdir -p /sys/fs/cgroup/system.slice/bench/test/1 echo +memory > /sys/fs/cgroup/system.slice/bench/cgroup.subtree_control echo +memory > /sys/fs/cgroup/system.slice/bench/test/cgroup.subtree_control echo +memory > /sys/fs/cgroup/system.slice/bench/test/1/cgroup.subtree_control echo 768M > /sys/fs/cgroup/system.slice/bench/memory.max } do_test() { read_worker() { mkdir -p "/sys/fs/cgroup/system.slice/bench/test/1/$1" echo $BASHPID > "/sys/fs/cgroup/system.slice/bench/test/1/$1/cgroup.procs" read -r __TMP < "/tmp/test-fs/$1"; } read_in_all() { for i in $(seq 10000); do read_worker "$i" & done; wait } echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches time read_in_all for i in $(seq 1 10000); do rmdir "/sys/fs/cgroup/system.slice/bench/test/1/$i" &>/dev/null done } Before: real 0m3.498s user 0m11.037s sys 0m35.872s real 1m33.860s user 0m11.593s sys 3m1.169s real 1m31.883s user 0m11.265s sys 2m59.198s real 1m32.394s user 0m11.294s sys 3m1.616s real 1m31.017s user 0m11.379s sys 3m1.349s real 1m31.931s user 0m11.295s sys 2m59.863s real 1m32.758s user 0m11.254s sys 2m59.538s real 1m35.198s user 0m11.145s sys 3m1.123s real 1m30.531s user 0m11.393s sys 2m58.089s real 1m31.142s user 0m11.333s sys 3m0.549s After: real 0m3.489s user 0m10.943s sys 0m36.036s real 1m10.893s user 0m11.495s sys 2m38.545s real 1m29.129s user 0m11.382s sys 3m1.601s real 1m29.944s user 0m11.494s sys 3m1.575s real 1m31.208s user 0m11.451s sys 2m59.693s real 1m25.944s user 0m11.327s sys 2m56.394s real 1m28.599s user 0m11.312s sys 3m0.162s real 1m26.746s user 0m11.538s sys 2m55.462s real 1m30.668s user 0m11.475s sys 3m2.075s real 1m29.258s user 0m11.292s sys 3m0.780s Which is slightly faster in real time. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241104175257.60853-5-ryncsn@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Kairui Song <kasong@tencent.com> Cc: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@bytedance.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev> Cc: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com> Cc: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev> Cc: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-11-04 17:52:55 +00:00
kvfree_rcu(mlru, rcu);
}
mutex_unlock(&list_lrus_mutex);
}
mm: introduce kmem_cache_alloc_lru We currently allocate scope for every memcg to be able to tracked on every superblock instantiated in the system, regardless of whether that superblock is even accessible to that memcg. These huge memcg counts come from container hosts where memcgs are confined to just a small subset of the total number of superblocks that instantiated at any given point in time. For these systems with huge container counts, list_lru does not need the capability of tracking every memcg on every superblock. What it comes down to is that adding the memcg to the list_lru at the first insert. So introduce kmem_cache_alloc_lru to allocate objects and its list_lru. In the later patch, we will convert all inode and dentry allocation from kmem_cache_alloc to kmem_cache_alloc_lru. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220228122126.37293-3-songmuchun@bytedance.com Signed-off-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com> Cc: Alex Shi <alexs@kernel.org> Cc: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com> Cc: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org> Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> Cc: Fam Zheng <fam.zheng@bytedance.com> Cc: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Kari Argillander <kari.argillander@gmail.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> Cc: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com> Cc: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com> Cc: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com> Cc: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com> Cc: Xiongchun Duan <duanxiongchun@bytedance.com> Cc: Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2022-03-22 21:40:56 +00:00
mm: list_lru: replace linear array with xarray If we run 10k containers in the system, the size of the list_lru_memcg->lrus can be ~96KB per list_lru. When we decrease the number containers, the size of the array will not be shrinked. It is not scalable. The xarray is a good choice for this case. We can save a lot of memory when there are tens of thousands continers in the system. If we use xarray, we also can remove the logic code of resizing array, which can simplify the code. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: remove unused local] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220228122126.37293-13-songmuchun@bytedance.com Signed-off-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com> Cc: Alex Shi <alexs@kernel.org> Cc: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com> Cc: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org> Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> Cc: Fam Zheng <fam.zheng@bytedance.com> Cc: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Kari Argillander <kari.argillander@gmail.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> Cc: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com> Cc: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com> Cc: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com> Cc: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com> Cc: Xiongchun Duan <duanxiongchun@bytedance.com> Cc: Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2022-03-22 21:41:25 +00:00
static inline bool memcg_list_lru_allocated(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
struct list_lru *lru)
mm: introduce kmem_cache_alloc_lru We currently allocate scope for every memcg to be able to tracked on every superblock instantiated in the system, regardless of whether that superblock is even accessible to that memcg. These huge memcg counts come from container hosts where memcgs are confined to just a small subset of the total number of superblocks that instantiated at any given point in time. For these systems with huge container counts, list_lru does not need the capability of tracking every memcg on every superblock. What it comes down to is that adding the memcg to the list_lru at the first insert. So introduce kmem_cache_alloc_lru to allocate objects and its list_lru. In the later patch, we will convert all inode and dentry allocation from kmem_cache_alloc to kmem_cache_alloc_lru. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220228122126.37293-3-songmuchun@bytedance.com Signed-off-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com> Cc: Alex Shi <alexs@kernel.org> Cc: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com> Cc: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org> Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> Cc: Fam Zheng <fam.zheng@bytedance.com> Cc: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Kari Argillander <kari.argillander@gmail.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> Cc: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com> Cc: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com> Cc: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com> Cc: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com> Cc: Xiongchun Duan <duanxiongchun@bytedance.com> Cc: Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2022-03-22 21:40:56 +00:00
{
mm: list_lru: replace linear array with xarray If we run 10k containers in the system, the size of the list_lru_memcg->lrus can be ~96KB per list_lru. When we decrease the number containers, the size of the array will not be shrinked. It is not scalable. The xarray is a good choice for this case. We can save a lot of memory when there are tens of thousands continers in the system. If we use xarray, we also can remove the logic code of resizing array, which can simplify the code. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: remove unused local] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220228122126.37293-13-songmuchun@bytedance.com Signed-off-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com> Cc: Alex Shi <alexs@kernel.org> Cc: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com> Cc: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org> Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> Cc: Fam Zheng <fam.zheng@bytedance.com> Cc: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Kari Argillander <kari.argillander@gmail.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> Cc: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com> Cc: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com> Cc: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com> Cc: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com> Cc: Xiongchun Duan <duanxiongchun@bytedance.com> Cc: Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2022-03-22 21:41:25 +00:00
int idx = memcg->kmemcg_id;
mm: introduce kmem_cache_alloc_lru We currently allocate scope for every memcg to be able to tracked on every superblock instantiated in the system, regardless of whether that superblock is even accessible to that memcg. These huge memcg counts come from container hosts where memcgs are confined to just a small subset of the total number of superblocks that instantiated at any given point in time. For these systems with huge container counts, list_lru does not need the capability of tracking every memcg on every superblock. What it comes down to is that adding the memcg to the list_lru at the first insert. So introduce kmem_cache_alloc_lru to allocate objects and its list_lru. In the later patch, we will convert all inode and dentry allocation from kmem_cache_alloc to kmem_cache_alloc_lru. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220228122126.37293-3-songmuchun@bytedance.com Signed-off-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com> Cc: Alex Shi <alexs@kernel.org> Cc: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com> Cc: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org> Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> Cc: Fam Zheng <fam.zheng@bytedance.com> Cc: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Kari Argillander <kari.argillander@gmail.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> Cc: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com> Cc: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com> Cc: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com> Cc: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com> Cc: Xiongchun Duan <duanxiongchun@bytedance.com> Cc: Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2022-03-22 21:40:56 +00:00
mm: list_lru: replace linear array with xarray If we run 10k containers in the system, the size of the list_lru_memcg->lrus can be ~96KB per list_lru. When we decrease the number containers, the size of the array will not be shrinked. It is not scalable. The xarray is a good choice for this case. We can save a lot of memory when there are tens of thousands continers in the system. If we use xarray, we also can remove the logic code of resizing array, which can simplify the code. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: remove unused local] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220228122126.37293-13-songmuchun@bytedance.com Signed-off-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com> Cc: Alex Shi <alexs@kernel.org> Cc: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com> Cc: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org> Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> Cc: Fam Zheng <fam.zheng@bytedance.com> Cc: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Kari Argillander <kari.argillander@gmail.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> Cc: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com> Cc: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com> Cc: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com> Cc: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com> Cc: Xiongchun Duan <duanxiongchun@bytedance.com> Cc: Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2022-03-22 21:41:25 +00:00
return idx < 0 || xa_load(&lru->xa, idx);
mm: introduce kmem_cache_alloc_lru We currently allocate scope for every memcg to be able to tracked on every superblock instantiated in the system, regardless of whether that superblock is even accessible to that memcg. These huge memcg counts come from container hosts where memcgs are confined to just a small subset of the total number of superblocks that instantiated at any given point in time. For these systems with huge container counts, list_lru does not need the capability of tracking every memcg on every superblock. What it comes down to is that adding the memcg to the list_lru at the first insert. So introduce kmem_cache_alloc_lru to allocate objects and its list_lru. In the later patch, we will convert all inode and dentry allocation from kmem_cache_alloc to kmem_cache_alloc_lru. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220228122126.37293-3-songmuchun@bytedance.com Signed-off-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com> Cc: Alex Shi <alexs@kernel.org> Cc: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com> Cc: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org> Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> Cc: Fam Zheng <fam.zheng@bytedance.com> Cc: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Kari Argillander <kari.argillander@gmail.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> Cc: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com> Cc: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com> Cc: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com> Cc: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com> Cc: Xiongchun Duan <duanxiongchun@bytedance.com> Cc: Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2022-03-22 21:40:56 +00:00
}
int memcg_list_lru_alloc(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, struct list_lru *lru,
gfp_t gfp)
{
unsigned long flags;
mm/list_lru: simplify reparenting and initial allocation Currently, there is a lot of code for detecting reparent racing using kmemcg_id as the synchronization flag. And an intermediate table is required to record and compare the kmemcg_id. We can simplify this by just checking the cgroup css status, skip if cgroup is being offlined. On the reparenting side, ensure no more allocation is on going and no further allocation will occur by using the XArray lock as barrier. Combined with a O(n^2) top-down walk for the allocation, we get rid of the intermediate table allocation completely. Despite being O(n^2), it should be actually faster because it's not practical to have a very deep cgroup level, and in most cases the parent cgroup should have been allocated already. This also avoided changing kmemcg_id before reparenting, making cgroups have a stable index for list_lru_memcg. After this change it's possible that a dying cgroup will see a NULL value in XArray corresponding to the kmemcg_id, because the kmemcg_id will point to an empty slot. In such case, just fallback to use its parent. As a result the code is simpler, following test also showed a very slight performance gain (12 test runs): prepare() { mkdir /tmp/test-fs modprobe brd rd_nr=1 rd_size=16777216 mkfs.xfs -f /dev/ram0 mount -t xfs /dev/ram0 /tmp/test-fs for i in $(seq 10000); do seq 8000 > "/tmp/test-fs/$i" done mkdir -p /sys/fs/cgroup/system.slice/bench/test/1 echo +memory > /sys/fs/cgroup/system.slice/bench/cgroup.subtree_control echo +memory > /sys/fs/cgroup/system.slice/bench/test/cgroup.subtree_control echo +memory > /sys/fs/cgroup/system.slice/bench/test/1/cgroup.subtree_control echo 768M > /sys/fs/cgroup/system.slice/bench/memory.max } do_test() { read_worker() { mkdir -p "/sys/fs/cgroup/system.slice/bench/test/1/$1" echo $BASHPID > "/sys/fs/cgroup/system.slice/bench/test/1/$1/cgroup.procs" read -r __TMP < "/tmp/test-fs/$1"; } read_in_all() { for i in $(seq 10000); do read_worker "$i" & done; wait } echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches time read_in_all for i in $(seq 1 10000); do rmdir "/sys/fs/cgroup/system.slice/bench/test/1/$i" &>/dev/null done } Before: real 0m3.498s user 0m11.037s sys 0m35.872s real 1m33.860s user 0m11.593s sys 3m1.169s real 1m31.883s user 0m11.265s sys 2m59.198s real 1m32.394s user 0m11.294s sys 3m1.616s real 1m31.017s user 0m11.379s sys 3m1.349s real 1m31.931s user 0m11.295s sys 2m59.863s real 1m32.758s user 0m11.254s sys 2m59.538s real 1m35.198s user 0m11.145s sys 3m1.123s real 1m30.531s user 0m11.393s sys 2m58.089s real 1m31.142s user 0m11.333s sys 3m0.549s After: real 0m3.489s user 0m10.943s sys 0m36.036s real 1m10.893s user 0m11.495s sys 2m38.545s real 1m29.129s user 0m11.382s sys 3m1.601s real 1m29.944s user 0m11.494s sys 3m1.575s real 1m31.208s user 0m11.451s sys 2m59.693s real 1m25.944s user 0m11.327s sys 2m56.394s real 1m28.599s user 0m11.312s sys 3m0.162s real 1m26.746s user 0m11.538s sys 2m55.462s real 1m30.668s user 0m11.475s sys 3m2.075s real 1m29.258s user 0m11.292s sys 3m0.780s Which is slightly faster in real time. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241104175257.60853-5-ryncsn@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Kairui Song <kasong@tencent.com> Cc: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@bytedance.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev> Cc: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com> Cc: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev> Cc: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-11-04 17:52:55 +00:00
struct list_lru_memcg *mlru;
struct mem_cgroup *pos, *parent;
mm: list_lru: replace linear array with xarray If we run 10k containers in the system, the size of the list_lru_memcg->lrus can be ~96KB per list_lru. When we decrease the number containers, the size of the array will not be shrinked. It is not scalable. The xarray is a good choice for this case. We can save a lot of memory when there are tens of thousands continers in the system. If we use xarray, we also can remove the logic code of resizing array, which can simplify the code. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: remove unused local] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220228122126.37293-13-songmuchun@bytedance.com Signed-off-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com> Cc: Alex Shi <alexs@kernel.org> Cc: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com> Cc: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org> Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> Cc: Fam Zheng <fam.zheng@bytedance.com> Cc: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Kari Argillander <kari.argillander@gmail.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> Cc: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com> Cc: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com> Cc: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com> Cc: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com> Cc: Xiongchun Duan <duanxiongchun@bytedance.com> Cc: Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2022-03-22 21:41:25 +00:00
XA_STATE(xas, &lru->xa, 0);
mm: introduce kmem_cache_alloc_lru We currently allocate scope for every memcg to be able to tracked on every superblock instantiated in the system, regardless of whether that superblock is even accessible to that memcg. These huge memcg counts come from container hosts where memcgs are confined to just a small subset of the total number of superblocks that instantiated at any given point in time. For these systems with huge container counts, list_lru does not need the capability of tracking every memcg on every superblock. What it comes down to is that adding the memcg to the list_lru at the first insert. So introduce kmem_cache_alloc_lru to allocate objects and its list_lru. In the later patch, we will convert all inode and dentry allocation from kmem_cache_alloc to kmem_cache_alloc_lru. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220228122126.37293-3-songmuchun@bytedance.com Signed-off-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com> Cc: Alex Shi <alexs@kernel.org> Cc: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com> Cc: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org> Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> Cc: Fam Zheng <fam.zheng@bytedance.com> Cc: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Kari Argillander <kari.argillander@gmail.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> Cc: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com> Cc: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com> Cc: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com> Cc: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com> Cc: Xiongchun Duan <duanxiongchun@bytedance.com> Cc: Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2022-03-22 21:40:56 +00:00
if (!list_lru_memcg_aware(lru) || memcg_list_lru_allocated(memcg, lru))
return 0;
gfp &= GFP_RECLAIM_MASK;
/*
* Because the list_lru can be reparented to the parent cgroup's
* list_lru, we should make sure that this cgroup and all its
* ancestors have allocated list_lru_memcg.
mm: introduce kmem_cache_alloc_lru We currently allocate scope for every memcg to be able to tracked on every superblock instantiated in the system, regardless of whether that superblock is even accessible to that memcg. These huge memcg counts come from container hosts where memcgs are confined to just a small subset of the total number of superblocks that instantiated at any given point in time. For these systems with huge container counts, list_lru does not need the capability of tracking every memcg on every superblock. What it comes down to is that adding the memcg to the list_lru at the first insert. So introduce kmem_cache_alloc_lru to allocate objects and its list_lru. In the later patch, we will convert all inode and dentry allocation from kmem_cache_alloc to kmem_cache_alloc_lru. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220228122126.37293-3-songmuchun@bytedance.com Signed-off-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com> Cc: Alex Shi <alexs@kernel.org> Cc: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com> Cc: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org> Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> Cc: Fam Zheng <fam.zheng@bytedance.com> Cc: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Kari Argillander <kari.argillander@gmail.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> Cc: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com> Cc: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com> Cc: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com> Cc: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com> Cc: Xiongchun Duan <duanxiongchun@bytedance.com> Cc: Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2022-03-22 21:40:56 +00:00
*/
mm/list_lru: simplify reparenting and initial allocation Currently, there is a lot of code for detecting reparent racing using kmemcg_id as the synchronization flag. And an intermediate table is required to record and compare the kmemcg_id. We can simplify this by just checking the cgroup css status, skip if cgroup is being offlined. On the reparenting side, ensure no more allocation is on going and no further allocation will occur by using the XArray lock as barrier. Combined with a O(n^2) top-down walk for the allocation, we get rid of the intermediate table allocation completely. Despite being O(n^2), it should be actually faster because it's not practical to have a very deep cgroup level, and in most cases the parent cgroup should have been allocated already. This also avoided changing kmemcg_id before reparenting, making cgroups have a stable index for list_lru_memcg. After this change it's possible that a dying cgroup will see a NULL value in XArray corresponding to the kmemcg_id, because the kmemcg_id will point to an empty slot. In such case, just fallback to use its parent. As a result the code is simpler, following test also showed a very slight performance gain (12 test runs): prepare() { mkdir /tmp/test-fs modprobe brd rd_nr=1 rd_size=16777216 mkfs.xfs -f /dev/ram0 mount -t xfs /dev/ram0 /tmp/test-fs for i in $(seq 10000); do seq 8000 > "/tmp/test-fs/$i" done mkdir -p /sys/fs/cgroup/system.slice/bench/test/1 echo +memory > /sys/fs/cgroup/system.slice/bench/cgroup.subtree_control echo +memory > /sys/fs/cgroup/system.slice/bench/test/cgroup.subtree_control echo +memory > /sys/fs/cgroup/system.slice/bench/test/1/cgroup.subtree_control echo 768M > /sys/fs/cgroup/system.slice/bench/memory.max } do_test() { read_worker() { mkdir -p "/sys/fs/cgroup/system.slice/bench/test/1/$1" echo $BASHPID > "/sys/fs/cgroup/system.slice/bench/test/1/$1/cgroup.procs" read -r __TMP < "/tmp/test-fs/$1"; } read_in_all() { for i in $(seq 10000); do read_worker "$i" & done; wait } echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches time read_in_all for i in $(seq 1 10000); do rmdir "/sys/fs/cgroup/system.slice/bench/test/1/$i" &>/dev/null done } Before: real 0m3.498s user 0m11.037s sys 0m35.872s real 1m33.860s user 0m11.593s sys 3m1.169s real 1m31.883s user 0m11.265s sys 2m59.198s real 1m32.394s user 0m11.294s sys 3m1.616s real 1m31.017s user 0m11.379s sys 3m1.349s real 1m31.931s user 0m11.295s sys 2m59.863s real 1m32.758s user 0m11.254s sys 2m59.538s real 1m35.198s user 0m11.145s sys 3m1.123s real 1m30.531s user 0m11.393s sys 2m58.089s real 1m31.142s user 0m11.333s sys 3m0.549s After: real 0m3.489s user 0m10.943s sys 0m36.036s real 1m10.893s user 0m11.495s sys 2m38.545s real 1m29.129s user 0m11.382s sys 3m1.601s real 1m29.944s user 0m11.494s sys 3m1.575s real 1m31.208s user 0m11.451s sys 2m59.693s real 1m25.944s user 0m11.327s sys 2m56.394s real 1m28.599s user 0m11.312s sys 3m0.162s real 1m26.746s user 0m11.538s sys 2m55.462s real 1m30.668s user 0m11.475s sys 3m2.075s real 1m29.258s user 0m11.292s sys 3m0.780s Which is slightly faster in real time. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241104175257.60853-5-ryncsn@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Kairui Song <kasong@tencent.com> Cc: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@bytedance.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev> Cc: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com> Cc: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev> Cc: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-11-04 17:52:55 +00:00
do {
/*
* Keep finding the farest parent that wasn't populated
* until found memcg itself.
*/
pos = memcg;
parent = parent_mem_cgroup(pos);
while (!memcg_list_lru_allocated(parent, lru)) {
pos = parent;
parent = parent_mem_cgroup(pos);
mm: introduce kmem_cache_alloc_lru We currently allocate scope for every memcg to be able to tracked on every superblock instantiated in the system, regardless of whether that superblock is even accessible to that memcg. These huge memcg counts come from container hosts where memcgs are confined to just a small subset of the total number of superblocks that instantiated at any given point in time. For these systems with huge container counts, list_lru does not need the capability of tracking every memcg on every superblock. What it comes down to is that adding the memcg to the list_lru at the first insert. So introduce kmem_cache_alloc_lru to allocate objects and its list_lru. In the later patch, we will convert all inode and dentry allocation from kmem_cache_alloc to kmem_cache_alloc_lru. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220228122126.37293-3-songmuchun@bytedance.com Signed-off-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com> Cc: Alex Shi <alexs@kernel.org> Cc: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com> Cc: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org> Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> Cc: Fam Zheng <fam.zheng@bytedance.com> Cc: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Kari Argillander <kari.argillander@gmail.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> Cc: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com> Cc: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com> Cc: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com> Cc: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com> Cc: Xiongchun Duan <duanxiongchun@bytedance.com> Cc: Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2022-03-22 21:40:56 +00:00
}
mm/list_lru: split the lock to per-cgroup scope Currently, every list_lru has a per-node lock that protects adding, deletion, isolation, and reparenting of all list_lru_one instances belonging to this list_lru on this node. This lock contention is heavy when multiple cgroups modify the same list_lru. This lock can be split into per-cgroup scope to reduce contention. To achieve this, we need a stable list_lru_one for every cgroup. This commit adds a lock to each list_lru_one and introduced a helper function lock_list_lru_of_memcg, making it possible to pin the list_lru of a memcg. Then reworked the reparenting process. Reparenting will switch the list_lru_one instances one by one. By locking each instance and marking it dead using the nr_items counter, reparenting ensures that all items in the corresponding cgroup (on-list or not, because items have a stable cgroup, see below) will see the list_lru_one switch synchronously. Objcg reparent is also moved after list_lru reparent so items will have a stable mem cgroup until all list_lru_one instances are drained. The only caller that doesn't work the *_obj interfaces are direct calls to list_lru_{add,del}. But it's only used by zswap and that's also based on objcg, so it's fine. This also changes the bahaviour of the isolation function when LRU_RETRY or LRU_REMOVED_RETRY is returned, because now releasing the lock could unblock reparenting and free the list_lru_one, isolation function will have to return withoug re-lock the lru. prepare() { mkdir /tmp/test-fs modprobe brd rd_nr=1 rd_size=33554432 mkfs.xfs -f /dev/ram0 mount -t xfs /dev/ram0 /tmp/test-fs for i in $(seq 1 512); do mkdir "/tmp/test-fs/$i" for j in $(seq 1 10240); do echo TEST-CONTENT > "/tmp/test-fs/$i/$j" done & done; wait } do_test() { read_worker() { sleep 1 tar -cv "$1" &>/dev/null } read_in_all() { cd "/tmp/test-fs" && ls for i in $(seq 1 512); do (exec sh -c 'echo "$PPID"') > "/sys/fs/cgroup/benchmark/$i/cgroup.procs" read_worker "$i" & done; wait } for i in $(seq 1 512); do mkdir -p "/sys/fs/cgroup/benchmark/$i" done echo +memory > /sys/fs/cgroup/benchmark/cgroup.subtree_control echo 512M > /sys/fs/cgroup/benchmark/memory.max echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches time read_in_all } Above script simulates compression of small files in multiple cgroups with memory pressure. Run prepare() then do_test for 6 times: Before: real 0m7.762s user 0m11.340s sys 3m11.224s real 0m8.123s user 0m11.548s sys 3m2.549s real 0m7.736s user 0m11.515s sys 3m11.171s real 0m8.539s user 0m11.508s sys 3m7.618s real 0m7.928s user 0m11.349s sys 3m13.063s real 0m8.105s user 0m11.128s sys 3m14.313s After this commit (about ~15% faster): real 0m6.953s user 0m11.327s sys 2m42.912s real 0m7.453s user 0m11.343s sys 2m51.942s real 0m6.916s user 0m11.269s sys 2m43.957s real 0m6.894s user 0m11.528s sys 2m45.346s real 0m6.911s user 0m11.095s sys 2m43.168s real 0m6.773s user 0m11.518s sys 2m40.774s Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241104175257.60853-6-ryncsn@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Kairui Song <kasong@tencent.com> Cc: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@bytedance.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev> Cc: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com> Cc: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev> Cc: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-11-04 17:52:56 +00:00
mlru = memcg_init_list_lru_one(lru, gfp);
mm/list_lru: simplify reparenting and initial allocation Currently, there is a lot of code for detecting reparent racing using kmemcg_id as the synchronization flag. And an intermediate table is required to record and compare the kmemcg_id. We can simplify this by just checking the cgroup css status, skip if cgroup is being offlined. On the reparenting side, ensure no more allocation is on going and no further allocation will occur by using the XArray lock as barrier. Combined with a O(n^2) top-down walk for the allocation, we get rid of the intermediate table allocation completely. Despite being O(n^2), it should be actually faster because it's not practical to have a very deep cgroup level, and in most cases the parent cgroup should have been allocated already. This also avoided changing kmemcg_id before reparenting, making cgroups have a stable index for list_lru_memcg. After this change it's possible that a dying cgroup will see a NULL value in XArray corresponding to the kmemcg_id, because the kmemcg_id will point to an empty slot. In such case, just fallback to use its parent. As a result the code is simpler, following test also showed a very slight performance gain (12 test runs): prepare() { mkdir /tmp/test-fs modprobe brd rd_nr=1 rd_size=16777216 mkfs.xfs -f /dev/ram0 mount -t xfs /dev/ram0 /tmp/test-fs for i in $(seq 10000); do seq 8000 > "/tmp/test-fs/$i" done mkdir -p /sys/fs/cgroup/system.slice/bench/test/1 echo +memory > /sys/fs/cgroup/system.slice/bench/cgroup.subtree_control echo +memory > /sys/fs/cgroup/system.slice/bench/test/cgroup.subtree_control echo +memory > /sys/fs/cgroup/system.slice/bench/test/1/cgroup.subtree_control echo 768M > /sys/fs/cgroup/system.slice/bench/memory.max } do_test() { read_worker() { mkdir -p "/sys/fs/cgroup/system.slice/bench/test/1/$1" echo $BASHPID > "/sys/fs/cgroup/system.slice/bench/test/1/$1/cgroup.procs" read -r __TMP < "/tmp/test-fs/$1"; } read_in_all() { for i in $(seq 10000); do read_worker "$i" & done; wait } echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches time read_in_all for i in $(seq 1 10000); do rmdir "/sys/fs/cgroup/system.slice/bench/test/1/$i" &>/dev/null done } Before: real 0m3.498s user 0m11.037s sys 0m35.872s real 1m33.860s user 0m11.593s sys 3m1.169s real 1m31.883s user 0m11.265s sys 2m59.198s real 1m32.394s user 0m11.294s sys 3m1.616s real 1m31.017s user 0m11.379s sys 3m1.349s real 1m31.931s user 0m11.295s sys 2m59.863s real 1m32.758s user 0m11.254s sys 2m59.538s real 1m35.198s user 0m11.145s sys 3m1.123s real 1m30.531s user 0m11.393s sys 2m58.089s real 1m31.142s user 0m11.333s sys 3m0.549s After: real 0m3.489s user 0m10.943s sys 0m36.036s real 1m10.893s user 0m11.495s sys 2m38.545s real 1m29.129s user 0m11.382s sys 3m1.601s real 1m29.944s user 0m11.494s sys 3m1.575s real 1m31.208s user 0m11.451s sys 2m59.693s real 1m25.944s user 0m11.327s sys 2m56.394s real 1m28.599s user 0m11.312s sys 3m0.162s real 1m26.746s user 0m11.538s sys 2m55.462s real 1m30.668s user 0m11.475s sys 3m2.075s real 1m29.258s user 0m11.292s sys 3m0.780s Which is slightly faster in real time. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241104175257.60853-5-ryncsn@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Kairui Song <kasong@tencent.com> Cc: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@bytedance.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev> Cc: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com> Cc: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev> Cc: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-11-04 17:52:55 +00:00
if (!mlru)
return -ENOMEM;
xas_set(&xas, pos->kmemcg_id);
do {
xas_lock_irqsave(&xas, flags);
if (!xas_load(&xas) && !css_is_dying(&pos->css)) {
xas_store(&xas, mlru);
if (!xas_error(&xas))
mlru = NULL;
mm: list_lru: replace linear array with xarray If we run 10k containers in the system, the size of the list_lru_memcg->lrus can be ~96KB per list_lru. When we decrease the number containers, the size of the array will not be shrinked. It is not scalable. The xarray is a good choice for this case. We can save a lot of memory when there are tens of thousands continers in the system. If we use xarray, we also can remove the logic code of resizing array, which can simplify the code. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: remove unused local] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220228122126.37293-13-songmuchun@bytedance.com Signed-off-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com> Cc: Alex Shi <alexs@kernel.org> Cc: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com> Cc: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org> Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> Cc: Fam Zheng <fam.zheng@bytedance.com> Cc: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Kari Argillander <kari.argillander@gmail.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> Cc: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com> Cc: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com> Cc: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com> Cc: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com> Cc: Xiongchun Duan <duanxiongchun@bytedance.com> Cc: Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2022-03-22 21:41:25 +00:00
}
mm/list_lru: simplify reparenting and initial allocation Currently, there is a lot of code for detecting reparent racing using kmemcg_id as the synchronization flag. And an intermediate table is required to record and compare the kmemcg_id. We can simplify this by just checking the cgroup css status, skip if cgroup is being offlined. On the reparenting side, ensure no more allocation is on going and no further allocation will occur by using the XArray lock as barrier. Combined with a O(n^2) top-down walk for the allocation, we get rid of the intermediate table allocation completely. Despite being O(n^2), it should be actually faster because it's not practical to have a very deep cgroup level, and in most cases the parent cgroup should have been allocated already. This also avoided changing kmemcg_id before reparenting, making cgroups have a stable index for list_lru_memcg. After this change it's possible that a dying cgroup will see a NULL value in XArray corresponding to the kmemcg_id, because the kmemcg_id will point to an empty slot. In such case, just fallback to use its parent. As a result the code is simpler, following test also showed a very slight performance gain (12 test runs): prepare() { mkdir /tmp/test-fs modprobe brd rd_nr=1 rd_size=16777216 mkfs.xfs -f /dev/ram0 mount -t xfs /dev/ram0 /tmp/test-fs for i in $(seq 10000); do seq 8000 > "/tmp/test-fs/$i" done mkdir -p /sys/fs/cgroup/system.slice/bench/test/1 echo +memory > /sys/fs/cgroup/system.slice/bench/cgroup.subtree_control echo +memory > /sys/fs/cgroup/system.slice/bench/test/cgroup.subtree_control echo +memory > /sys/fs/cgroup/system.slice/bench/test/1/cgroup.subtree_control echo 768M > /sys/fs/cgroup/system.slice/bench/memory.max } do_test() { read_worker() { mkdir -p "/sys/fs/cgroup/system.slice/bench/test/1/$1" echo $BASHPID > "/sys/fs/cgroup/system.slice/bench/test/1/$1/cgroup.procs" read -r __TMP < "/tmp/test-fs/$1"; } read_in_all() { for i in $(seq 10000); do read_worker "$i" & done; wait } echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches time read_in_all for i in $(seq 1 10000); do rmdir "/sys/fs/cgroup/system.slice/bench/test/1/$i" &>/dev/null done } Before: real 0m3.498s user 0m11.037s sys 0m35.872s real 1m33.860s user 0m11.593s sys 3m1.169s real 1m31.883s user 0m11.265s sys 2m59.198s real 1m32.394s user 0m11.294s sys 3m1.616s real 1m31.017s user 0m11.379s sys 3m1.349s real 1m31.931s user 0m11.295s sys 2m59.863s real 1m32.758s user 0m11.254s sys 2m59.538s real 1m35.198s user 0m11.145s sys 3m1.123s real 1m30.531s user 0m11.393s sys 2m58.089s real 1m31.142s user 0m11.333s sys 3m0.549s After: real 0m3.489s user 0m10.943s sys 0m36.036s real 1m10.893s user 0m11.495s sys 2m38.545s real 1m29.129s user 0m11.382s sys 3m1.601s real 1m29.944s user 0m11.494s sys 3m1.575s real 1m31.208s user 0m11.451s sys 2m59.693s real 1m25.944s user 0m11.327s sys 2m56.394s real 1m28.599s user 0m11.312s sys 3m0.162s real 1m26.746s user 0m11.538s sys 2m55.462s real 1m30.668s user 0m11.475s sys 3m2.075s real 1m29.258s user 0m11.292s sys 3m0.780s Which is slightly faster in real time. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241104175257.60853-5-ryncsn@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Kairui Song <kasong@tencent.com> Cc: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@bytedance.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev> Cc: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com> Cc: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev> Cc: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-11-04 17:52:55 +00:00
xas_unlock_irqrestore(&xas, flags);
} while (xas_nomem(&xas, gfp));
if (mlru)
kfree(mlru);
} while (pos != memcg && !css_is_dying(&pos->css));
mm: introduce kmem_cache_alloc_lru We currently allocate scope for every memcg to be able to tracked on every superblock instantiated in the system, regardless of whether that superblock is even accessible to that memcg. These huge memcg counts come from container hosts where memcgs are confined to just a small subset of the total number of superblocks that instantiated at any given point in time. For these systems with huge container counts, list_lru does not need the capability of tracking every memcg on every superblock. What it comes down to is that adding the memcg to the list_lru at the first insert. So introduce kmem_cache_alloc_lru to allocate objects and its list_lru. In the later patch, we will convert all inode and dentry allocation from kmem_cache_alloc to kmem_cache_alloc_lru. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220228122126.37293-3-songmuchun@bytedance.com Signed-off-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com> Cc: Alex Shi <alexs@kernel.org> Cc: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com> Cc: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org> Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> Cc: Fam Zheng <fam.zheng@bytedance.com> Cc: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Kari Argillander <kari.argillander@gmail.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> Cc: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com> Cc: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com> Cc: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com> Cc: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com> Cc: Xiongchun Duan <duanxiongchun@bytedance.com> Cc: Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2022-03-22 21:40:56 +00:00
mm: list_lru: replace linear array with xarray If we run 10k containers in the system, the size of the list_lru_memcg->lrus can be ~96KB per list_lru. When we decrease the number containers, the size of the array will not be shrinked. It is not scalable. The xarray is a good choice for this case. We can save a lot of memory when there are tens of thousands continers in the system. If we use xarray, we also can remove the logic code of resizing array, which can simplify the code. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: remove unused local] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220228122126.37293-13-songmuchun@bytedance.com Signed-off-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com> Cc: Alex Shi <alexs@kernel.org> Cc: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com> Cc: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org> Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> Cc: Fam Zheng <fam.zheng@bytedance.com> Cc: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Kari Argillander <kari.argillander@gmail.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> Cc: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com> Cc: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com> Cc: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com> Cc: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com> Cc: Xiongchun Duan <duanxiongchun@bytedance.com> Cc: Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2022-03-22 21:41:25 +00:00
return xas_error(&xas);
mm: introduce kmem_cache_alloc_lru We currently allocate scope for every memcg to be able to tracked on every superblock instantiated in the system, regardless of whether that superblock is even accessible to that memcg. These huge memcg counts come from container hosts where memcgs are confined to just a small subset of the total number of superblocks that instantiated at any given point in time. For these systems with huge container counts, list_lru does not need the capability of tracking every memcg on every superblock. What it comes down to is that adding the memcg to the list_lru at the first insert. So introduce kmem_cache_alloc_lru to allocate objects and its list_lru. In the later patch, we will convert all inode and dentry allocation from kmem_cache_alloc to kmem_cache_alloc_lru. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220228122126.37293-3-songmuchun@bytedance.com Signed-off-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com> Cc: Alex Shi <alexs@kernel.org> Cc: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com> Cc: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org> Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> Cc: Fam Zheng <fam.zheng@bytedance.com> Cc: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Kari Argillander <kari.argillander@gmail.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> Cc: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com> Cc: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com> Cc: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com> Cc: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com> Cc: Xiongchun Duan <duanxiongchun@bytedance.com> Cc: Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2022-03-22 21:40:56 +00:00
}
list_lru: introduce per-memcg lists There are several FS shrinkers, including super_block::s_shrink, that keep reclaimable objects in the list_lru structure. Hence to turn them to memcg-aware shrinkers, it is enough to make list_lru per-memcg. This patch does the trick. It adds an array of lru lists to the list_lru_node structure (per-node part of the list_lru), one for each kmem-active memcg, and dispatches every item addition or removal to the list corresponding to the memcg which the item is accounted to. So now the list_lru structure is not just per node, but per node and per memcg. Not all list_lrus need this feature, so this patch also adds a new method, list_lru_init_memcg, which initializes a list_lru as memcg aware. Otherwise (i.e. if initialized with old list_lru_init), the list_lru won't have per memcg lists. Just like per memcg caches arrays, the arrays of per-memcg lists are indexed by memcg_cache_id, so we must grow them whenever memcg_nr_cache_ids is increased. So we introduce a callback, memcg_update_all_list_lrus, invoked by memcg_alloc_cache_id if the id space is full. The locking is implemented in a manner similar to lruvecs, i.e. we have one lock per node that protects all lists (both global and per cgroup) on the node. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@parallels.com> Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz> Cc: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com> Cc: Glauber Costa <glommer@gmail.com> Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com> Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2015-02-12 22:59:10 +00:00
#else
mm: list_lru: replace linear array with xarray If we run 10k containers in the system, the size of the list_lru_memcg->lrus can be ~96KB per list_lru. When we decrease the number containers, the size of the array will not be shrinked. It is not scalable. The xarray is a good choice for this case. We can save a lot of memory when there are tens of thousands continers in the system. If we use xarray, we also can remove the logic code of resizing array, which can simplify the code. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: remove unused local] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220228122126.37293-13-songmuchun@bytedance.com Signed-off-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com> Cc: Alex Shi <alexs@kernel.org> Cc: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com> Cc: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org> Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> Cc: Fam Zheng <fam.zheng@bytedance.com> Cc: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Kari Argillander <kari.argillander@gmail.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> Cc: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com> Cc: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com> Cc: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com> Cc: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com> Cc: Xiongchun Duan <duanxiongchun@bytedance.com> Cc: Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2022-03-22 21:41:25 +00:00
static inline void memcg_init_list_lru(struct list_lru *lru, bool memcg_aware)
list_lru: introduce per-memcg lists There are several FS shrinkers, including super_block::s_shrink, that keep reclaimable objects in the list_lru structure. Hence to turn them to memcg-aware shrinkers, it is enough to make list_lru per-memcg. This patch does the trick. It adds an array of lru lists to the list_lru_node structure (per-node part of the list_lru), one for each kmem-active memcg, and dispatches every item addition or removal to the list corresponding to the memcg which the item is accounted to. So now the list_lru structure is not just per node, but per node and per memcg. Not all list_lrus need this feature, so this patch also adds a new method, list_lru_init_memcg, which initializes a list_lru as memcg aware. Otherwise (i.e. if initialized with old list_lru_init), the list_lru won't have per memcg lists. Just like per memcg caches arrays, the arrays of per-memcg lists are indexed by memcg_cache_id, so we must grow them whenever memcg_nr_cache_ids is increased. So we introduce a callback, memcg_update_all_list_lrus, invoked by memcg_alloc_cache_id if the id space is full. The locking is implemented in a manner similar to lruvecs, i.e. we have one lock per node that protects all lists (both global and per cgroup) on the node. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@parallels.com> Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz> Cc: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com> Cc: Glauber Costa <glommer@gmail.com> Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com> Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2015-02-12 22:59:10 +00:00
{
}
static void memcg_destroy_list_lru(struct list_lru *lru)
{
}
#endif /* CONFIG_MEMCG */
list_lru: introduce per-memcg lists There are several FS shrinkers, including super_block::s_shrink, that keep reclaimable objects in the list_lru structure. Hence to turn them to memcg-aware shrinkers, it is enough to make list_lru per-memcg. This patch does the trick. It adds an array of lru lists to the list_lru_node structure (per-node part of the list_lru), one for each kmem-active memcg, and dispatches every item addition or removal to the list corresponding to the memcg which the item is accounted to. So now the list_lru structure is not just per node, but per node and per memcg. Not all list_lrus need this feature, so this patch also adds a new method, list_lru_init_memcg, which initializes a list_lru as memcg aware. Otherwise (i.e. if initialized with old list_lru_init), the list_lru won't have per memcg lists. Just like per memcg caches arrays, the arrays of per-memcg lists are indexed by memcg_cache_id, so we must grow them whenever memcg_nr_cache_ids is increased. So we introduce a callback, memcg_update_all_list_lrus, invoked by memcg_alloc_cache_id if the id space is full. The locking is implemented in a manner similar to lruvecs, i.e. we have one lock per node that protects all lists (both global and per cgroup) on the node. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@parallels.com> Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz> Cc: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com> Cc: Glauber Costa <glommer@gmail.com> Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com> Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2015-02-12 22:59:10 +00:00
int __list_lru_init(struct list_lru *lru, bool memcg_aware, struct shrinker *shrinker)
list: add a new LRU list type Several subsystems use the same construct for LRU lists - a list head, a spin lock and and item count. They also use exactly the same code for adding and removing items from the LRU. Create a generic type for these LRU lists. This is the beginning of generic, node aware LRUs for shrinkers to work with. [glommer@openvz.org: enum defined constants for lru. Suggested by gthelen, don't relock over retry] Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <glommer@openvz.org> Reviewed-by: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com> Acked-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com> Cc: Arve Hjønnevåg <arve@android.com> Cc: Carlos Maiolino <cmaiolino@redhat.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com> Cc: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com> Cc: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Cc: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com> Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org> Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> Cc: Kent Overstreet <koverstreet@google.com> Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Cc: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com> Cc: Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@vmware.com> Cc: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2013-08-28 00:17:58 +00:00
{
list_lru: per-node list infrastructure Now that we have an LRU list API, we can start to enhance the implementation. This splits the single LRU list into per-node lists and locks to enhance scalability. Items are placed on lists according to the node the memory belongs to. To make scanning the lists efficient, also track whether the per-node lists have entries in them in a active nodemask. Note: We use a fixed-size array for the node LRU, this struct can be very big if MAX_NUMNODES is big. If this becomes a problem this is fixable by turning this into a pointer and dynamically allocating this to nr_node_ids. This quantity is firwmare-provided, and still would provide room for all nodes at the cost of a pointer lookup and an extra allocation. Because that allocation will most likely come from a may very well fail. [glommer@openvz.org: fix warnings, added note about node lru] Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <glommer@openvz.org> Reviewed-by: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com> Acked-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com> Cc: Arve Hjønnevåg <arve@android.com> Cc: Carlos Maiolino <cmaiolino@redhat.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com> Cc: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com> Cc: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Cc: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com> Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org> Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> Cc: Kent Overstreet <koverstreet@google.com> Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Cc: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com> Cc: Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@vmware.com> Cc: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2013-08-28 00:18:00 +00:00
int i;
list_lru: introduce per-memcg lists There are several FS shrinkers, including super_block::s_shrink, that keep reclaimable objects in the list_lru structure. Hence to turn them to memcg-aware shrinkers, it is enough to make list_lru per-memcg. This patch does the trick. It adds an array of lru lists to the list_lru_node structure (per-node part of the list_lru), one for each kmem-active memcg, and dispatches every item addition or removal to the list corresponding to the memcg which the item is accounted to. So now the list_lru structure is not just per node, but per node and per memcg. Not all list_lrus need this feature, so this patch also adds a new method, list_lru_init_memcg, which initializes a list_lru as memcg aware. Otherwise (i.e. if initialized with old list_lru_init), the list_lru won't have per memcg lists. Just like per memcg caches arrays, the arrays of per-memcg lists are indexed by memcg_cache_id, so we must grow them whenever memcg_nr_cache_ids is increased. So we introduce a callback, memcg_update_all_list_lrus, invoked by memcg_alloc_cache_id if the id space is full. The locking is implemented in a manner similar to lruvecs, i.e. we have one lock per node that protects all lists (both global and per cgroup) on the node. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@parallels.com> Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz> Cc: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com> Cc: Glauber Costa <glommer@gmail.com> Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com> Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2015-02-12 22:59:10 +00:00
#ifdef CONFIG_MEMCG
fs: propagate shrinker::id to list_lru Add list_lru::shrinker_id field and populate it by registered shrinker id. This will be used to set correct bit in memcg shrinkers map by lru code in next patches, after there appeared the first related to memcg element in list_lru. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/153063059758.1818.14866596416857717800.stgit@localhost.localdomain Signed-off-by: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@virtuozzo.com> Acked-by: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com> Tested-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com> Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@virtuozzo.com> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Cc: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com> Cc: Li RongQing <lirongqing@baidu.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org> Cc: Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@nexb.com> Cc: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com> Cc: Sahitya Tummala <stummala@codeaurora.org> Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Cc: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2018-08-17 22:47:50 +00:00
if (shrinker)
lru->shrinker_id = shrinker->id;
else
lru->shrinker_id = -1;
if (mem_cgroup_kmem_disabled())
memcg_aware = false;
fs: propagate shrinker::id to list_lru Add list_lru::shrinker_id field and populate it by registered shrinker id. This will be used to set correct bit in memcg shrinkers map by lru code in next patches, after there appeared the first related to memcg element in list_lru. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/153063059758.1818.14866596416857717800.stgit@localhost.localdomain Signed-off-by: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@virtuozzo.com> Acked-by: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com> Tested-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com> Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@virtuozzo.com> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Cc: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com> Cc: Li RongQing <lirongqing@baidu.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org> Cc: Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@nexb.com> Cc: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com> Cc: Sahitya Tummala <stummala@codeaurora.org> Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Cc: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2018-08-17 22:47:50 +00:00
#endif
list_lru: dynamically adjust node arrays We currently use a compile-time constant to size the node array for the list_lru structure. Due to this, we don't need to allocate any memory at initialization time. But as a consequence, the structures that contain embedded list_lru lists can become way too big (the superblock for instance contains two of them). This patch aims at ameliorating this situation by dynamically allocating the node arrays with the firmware provided nr_node_ids. Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <glommer@openvz.org> Cc: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com> Cc: Arve Hjønnevåg <arve@android.com> Cc: Carlos Maiolino <cmaiolino@redhat.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com> Cc: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com> Cc: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Cc: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com> Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org> Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> Cc: Kent Overstreet <koverstreet@google.com> Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Cc: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com> Cc: Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@vmware.com> Cc: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2013-08-28 00:18:18 +00:00
lru->node = kcalloc(nr_node_ids, sizeof(*lru->node), GFP_KERNEL);
list_lru: dynamically adjust node arrays We currently use a compile-time constant to size the node array for the list_lru structure. Due to this, we don't need to allocate any memory at initialization time. But as a consequence, the structures that contain embedded list_lru lists can become way too big (the superblock for instance contains two of them). This patch aims at ameliorating this situation by dynamically allocating the node arrays with the firmware provided nr_node_ids. Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <glommer@openvz.org> Cc: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com> Cc: Arve Hjønnevåg <arve@android.com> Cc: Carlos Maiolino <cmaiolino@redhat.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com> Cc: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com> Cc: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Cc: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com> Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org> Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> Cc: Kent Overstreet <koverstreet@google.com> Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Cc: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com> Cc: Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@vmware.com> Cc: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2013-08-28 00:18:18 +00:00
if (!lru->node)
mm: list_lru: replace linear array with xarray If we run 10k containers in the system, the size of the list_lru_memcg->lrus can be ~96KB per list_lru. When we decrease the number containers, the size of the array will not be shrinked. It is not scalable. The xarray is a good choice for this case. We can save a lot of memory when there are tens of thousands continers in the system. If we use xarray, we also can remove the logic code of resizing array, which can simplify the code. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: remove unused local] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220228122126.37293-13-songmuchun@bytedance.com Signed-off-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com> Cc: Alex Shi <alexs@kernel.org> Cc: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com> Cc: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org> Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> Cc: Fam Zheng <fam.zheng@bytedance.com> Cc: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Kari Argillander <kari.argillander@gmail.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> Cc: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com> Cc: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com> Cc: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com> Cc: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com> Cc: Xiongchun Duan <duanxiongchun@bytedance.com> Cc: Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2022-03-22 21:41:25 +00:00
return -ENOMEM;
list: add a new LRU list type Several subsystems use the same construct for LRU lists - a list head, a spin lock and and item count. They also use exactly the same code for adding and removing items from the LRU. Create a generic type for these LRU lists. This is the beginning of generic, node aware LRUs for shrinkers to work with. [glommer@openvz.org: enum defined constants for lru. Suggested by gthelen, don't relock over retry] Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <glommer@openvz.org> Reviewed-by: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com> Acked-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com> Cc: Arve Hjønnevåg <arve@android.com> Cc: Carlos Maiolino <cmaiolino@redhat.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com> Cc: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com> Cc: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Cc: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com> Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org> Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> Cc: Kent Overstreet <koverstreet@google.com> Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Cc: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com> Cc: Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@vmware.com> Cc: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2013-08-28 00:17:58 +00:00
mm/list_lru: split the lock to per-cgroup scope Currently, every list_lru has a per-node lock that protects adding, deletion, isolation, and reparenting of all list_lru_one instances belonging to this list_lru on this node. This lock contention is heavy when multiple cgroups modify the same list_lru. This lock can be split into per-cgroup scope to reduce contention. To achieve this, we need a stable list_lru_one for every cgroup. This commit adds a lock to each list_lru_one and introduced a helper function lock_list_lru_of_memcg, making it possible to pin the list_lru of a memcg. Then reworked the reparenting process. Reparenting will switch the list_lru_one instances one by one. By locking each instance and marking it dead using the nr_items counter, reparenting ensures that all items in the corresponding cgroup (on-list or not, because items have a stable cgroup, see below) will see the list_lru_one switch synchronously. Objcg reparent is also moved after list_lru reparent so items will have a stable mem cgroup until all list_lru_one instances are drained. The only caller that doesn't work the *_obj interfaces are direct calls to list_lru_{add,del}. But it's only used by zswap and that's also based on objcg, so it's fine. This also changes the bahaviour of the isolation function when LRU_RETRY or LRU_REMOVED_RETRY is returned, because now releasing the lock could unblock reparenting and free the list_lru_one, isolation function will have to return withoug re-lock the lru. prepare() { mkdir /tmp/test-fs modprobe brd rd_nr=1 rd_size=33554432 mkfs.xfs -f /dev/ram0 mount -t xfs /dev/ram0 /tmp/test-fs for i in $(seq 1 512); do mkdir "/tmp/test-fs/$i" for j in $(seq 1 10240); do echo TEST-CONTENT > "/tmp/test-fs/$i/$j" done & done; wait } do_test() { read_worker() { sleep 1 tar -cv "$1" &>/dev/null } read_in_all() { cd "/tmp/test-fs" && ls for i in $(seq 1 512); do (exec sh -c 'echo "$PPID"') > "/sys/fs/cgroup/benchmark/$i/cgroup.procs" read_worker "$i" & done; wait } for i in $(seq 1 512); do mkdir -p "/sys/fs/cgroup/benchmark/$i" done echo +memory > /sys/fs/cgroup/benchmark/cgroup.subtree_control echo 512M > /sys/fs/cgroup/benchmark/memory.max echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches time read_in_all } Above script simulates compression of small files in multiple cgroups with memory pressure. Run prepare() then do_test for 6 times: Before: real 0m7.762s user 0m11.340s sys 3m11.224s real 0m8.123s user 0m11.548s sys 3m2.549s real 0m7.736s user 0m11.515s sys 3m11.171s real 0m8.539s user 0m11.508s sys 3m7.618s real 0m7.928s user 0m11.349s sys 3m13.063s real 0m8.105s user 0m11.128s sys 3m14.313s After this commit (about ~15% faster): real 0m6.953s user 0m11.327s sys 2m42.912s real 0m7.453s user 0m11.343s sys 2m51.942s real 0m6.916s user 0m11.269s sys 2m43.957s real 0m6.894s user 0m11.528s sys 2m45.346s real 0m6.911s user 0m11.095s sys 2m43.168s real 0m6.773s user 0m11.518s sys 2m40.774s Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241104175257.60853-6-ryncsn@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Kairui Song <kasong@tencent.com> Cc: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@bytedance.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: Muchun Song <muchun.song@linux.dev> Cc: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com> Cc: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev> Cc: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-11-04 17:52:56 +00:00
for_each_node(i)
init_one_lru(lru, &lru->node[i].lru);
list_lru: introduce per-memcg lists There are several FS shrinkers, including super_block::s_shrink, that keep reclaimable objects in the list_lru structure. Hence to turn them to memcg-aware shrinkers, it is enough to make list_lru per-memcg. This patch does the trick. It adds an array of lru lists to the list_lru_node structure (per-node part of the list_lru), one for each kmem-active memcg, and dispatches every item addition or removal to the list corresponding to the memcg which the item is accounted to. So now the list_lru structure is not just per node, but per node and per memcg. Not all list_lrus need this feature, so this patch also adds a new method, list_lru_init_memcg, which initializes a list_lru as memcg aware. Otherwise (i.e. if initialized with old list_lru_init), the list_lru won't have per memcg lists. Just like per memcg caches arrays, the arrays of per-memcg lists are indexed by memcg_cache_id, so we must grow them whenever memcg_nr_cache_ids is increased. So we introduce a callback, memcg_update_all_list_lrus, invoked by memcg_alloc_cache_id if the id space is full. The locking is implemented in a manner similar to lruvecs, i.e. we have one lock per node that protects all lists (both global and per cgroup) on the node. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@parallels.com> Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz> Cc: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com> Cc: Glauber Costa <glommer@gmail.com> Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com> Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2015-02-12 22:59:10 +00:00
mm: list_lru: replace linear array with xarray If we run 10k containers in the system, the size of the list_lru_memcg->lrus can be ~96KB per list_lru. When we decrease the number containers, the size of the array will not be shrinked. It is not scalable. The xarray is a good choice for this case. We can save a lot of memory when there are tens of thousands continers in the system. If we use xarray, we also can remove the logic code of resizing array, which can simplify the code. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: remove unused local] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220228122126.37293-13-songmuchun@bytedance.com Signed-off-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com> Cc: Alex Shi <alexs@kernel.org> Cc: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com> Cc: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org> Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> Cc: Fam Zheng <fam.zheng@bytedance.com> Cc: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Kari Argillander <kari.argillander@gmail.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> Cc: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com> Cc: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com> Cc: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com> Cc: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com> Cc: Xiongchun Duan <duanxiongchun@bytedance.com> Cc: Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2022-03-22 21:41:25 +00:00
memcg_init_list_lru(lru, memcg_aware);
list_lru_register(lru);
mm: list_lru: replace linear array with xarray If we run 10k containers in the system, the size of the list_lru_memcg->lrus can be ~96KB per list_lru. When we decrease the number containers, the size of the array will not be shrinked. It is not scalable. The xarray is a good choice for this case. We can save a lot of memory when there are tens of thousands continers in the system. If we use xarray, we also can remove the logic code of resizing array, which can simplify the code. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: remove unused local] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220228122126.37293-13-songmuchun@bytedance.com Signed-off-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com> Cc: Alex Shi <alexs@kernel.org> Cc: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com> Cc: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org> Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> Cc: Fam Zheng <fam.zheng@bytedance.com> Cc: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Kari Argillander <kari.argillander@gmail.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> Cc: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com> Cc: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com> Cc: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com> Cc: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com> Cc: Xiongchun Duan <duanxiongchun@bytedance.com> Cc: Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2022-03-22 21:41:25 +00:00
return 0;
list: add a new LRU list type Several subsystems use the same construct for LRU lists - a list head, a spin lock and and item count. They also use exactly the same code for adding and removing items from the LRU. Create a generic type for these LRU lists. This is the beginning of generic, node aware LRUs for shrinkers to work with. [glommer@openvz.org: enum defined constants for lru. Suggested by gthelen, don't relock over retry] Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <glommer@openvz.org> Reviewed-by: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com> Acked-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com> Cc: Arve Hjønnevåg <arve@android.com> Cc: Carlos Maiolino <cmaiolino@redhat.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com> Cc: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com> Cc: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Cc: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com> Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org> Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> Cc: Kent Overstreet <koverstreet@google.com> Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Cc: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com> Cc: Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@vmware.com> Cc: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2013-08-28 00:17:58 +00:00
}
list_lru: introduce per-memcg lists There are several FS shrinkers, including super_block::s_shrink, that keep reclaimable objects in the list_lru structure. Hence to turn them to memcg-aware shrinkers, it is enough to make list_lru per-memcg. This patch does the trick. It adds an array of lru lists to the list_lru_node structure (per-node part of the list_lru), one for each kmem-active memcg, and dispatches every item addition or removal to the list corresponding to the memcg which the item is accounted to. So now the list_lru structure is not just per node, but per node and per memcg. Not all list_lrus need this feature, so this patch also adds a new method, list_lru_init_memcg, which initializes a list_lru as memcg aware. Otherwise (i.e. if initialized with old list_lru_init), the list_lru won't have per memcg lists. Just like per memcg caches arrays, the arrays of per-memcg lists are indexed by memcg_cache_id, so we must grow them whenever memcg_nr_cache_ids is increased. So we introduce a callback, memcg_update_all_list_lrus, invoked by memcg_alloc_cache_id if the id space is full. The locking is implemented in a manner similar to lruvecs, i.e. we have one lock per node that protects all lists (both global and per cgroup) on the node. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@parallels.com> Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz> Cc: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com> Cc: Glauber Costa <glommer@gmail.com> Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com> Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2015-02-12 22:59:10 +00:00
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__list_lru_init);
list_lru: dynamically adjust node arrays We currently use a compile-time constant to size the node array for the list_lru structure. Due to this, we don't need to allocate any memory at initialization time. But as a consequence, the structures that contain embedded list_lru lists can become way too big (the superblock for instance contains two of them). This patch aims at ameliorating this situation by dynamically allocating the node arrays with the firmware provided nr_node_ids. Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <glommer@openvz.org> Cc: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com> Cc: Arve Hjønnevåg <arve@android.com> Cc: Carlos Maiolino <cmaiolino@redhat.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com> Cc: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com> Cc: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Cc: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com> Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org> Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> Cc: Kent Overstreet <koverstreet@google.com> Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Cc: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com> Cc: Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@vmware.com> Cc: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2013-08-28 00:18:18 +00:00
void list_lru_destroy(struct list_lru *lru)
{
/* Already destroyed or not yet initialized? */
if (!lru->node)
return;
list_lru: introduce per-memcg lists There are several FS shrinkers, including super_block::s_shrink, that keep reclaimable objects in the list_lru structure. Hence to turn them to memcg-aware shrinkers, it is enough to make list_lru per-memcg. This patch does the trick. It adds an array of lru lists to the list_lru_node structure (per-node part of the list_lru), one for each kmem-active memcg, and dispatches every item addition or removal to the list corresponding to the memcg which the item is accounted to. So now the list_lru structure is not just per node, but per node and per memcg. Not all list_lrus need this feature, so this patch also adds a new method, list_lru_init_memcg, which initializes a list_lru as memcg aware. Otherwise (i.e. if initialized with old list_lru_init), the list_lru won't have per memcg lists. Just like per memcg caches arrays, the arrays of per-memcg lists are indexed by memcg_cache_id, so we must grow them whenever memcg_nr_cache_ids is increased. So we introduce a callback, memcg_update_all_list_lrus, invoked by memcg_alloc_cache_id if the id space is full. The locking is implemented in a manner similar to lruvecs, i.e. we have one lock per node that protects all lists (both global and per cgroup) on the node. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@parallels.com> Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz> Cc: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com> Cc: Glauber Costa <glommer@gmail.com> Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com> Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2015-02-12 22:59:10 +00:00
list_lru_unregister(lru);
list_lru: introduce per-memcg lists There are several FS shrinkers, including super_block::s_shrink, that keep reclaimable objects in the list_lru structure. Hence to turn them to memcg-aware shrinkers, it is enough to make list_lru per-memcg. This patch does the trick. It adds an array of lru lists to the list_lru_node structure (per-node part of the list_lru), one for each kmem-active memcg, and dispatches every item addition or removal to the list corresponding to the memcg which the item is accounted to. So now the list_lru structure is not just per node, but per node and per memcg. Not all list_lrus need this feature, so this patch also adds a new method, list_lru_init_memcg, which initializes a list_lru as memcg aware. Otherwise (i.e. if initialized with old list_lru_init), the list_lru won't have per memcg lists. Just like per memcg caches arrays, the arrays of per-memcg lists are indexed by memcg_cache_id, so we must grow them whenever memcg_nr_cache_ids is increased. So we introduce a callback, memcg_update_all_list_lrus, invoked by memcg_alloc_cache_id if the id space is full. The locking is implemented in a manner similar to lruvecs, i.e. we have one lock per node that protects all lists (both global and per cgroup) on the node. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@parallels.com> Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz> Cc: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com> Cc: Glauber Costa <glommer@gmail.com> Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com> Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2015-02-12 22:59:10 +00:00
memcg_destroy_list_lru(lru);
list_lru: dynamically adjust node arrays We currently use a compile-time constant to size the node array for the list_lru structure. Due to this, we don't need to allocate any memory at initialization time. But as a consequence, the structures that contain embedded list_lru lists can become way too big (the superblock for instance contains two of them). This patch aims at ameliorating this situation by dynamically allocating the node arrays with the firmware provided nr_node_ids. Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <glommer@openvz.org> Cc: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com> Cc: Arve Hjønnevåg <arve@android.com> Cc: Carlos Maiolino <cmaiolino@redhat.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com> Cc: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com> Cc: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Cc: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com> Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org> Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> Cc: Kent Overstreet <koverstreet@google.com> Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Cc: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com> Cc: Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@vmware.com> Cc: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2013-08-28 00:18:18 +00:00
kfree(lru->node);
lru->node = NULL;
list_lru: introduce per-memcg lists There are several FS shrinkers, including super_block::s_shrink, that keep reclaimable objects in the list_lru structure. Hence to turn them to memcg-aware shrinkers, it is enough to make list_lru per-memcg. This patch does the trick. It adds an array of lru lists to the list_lru_node structure (per-node part of the list_lru), one for each kmem-active memcg, and dispatches every item addition or removal to the list corresponding to the memcg which the item is accounted to. So now the list_lru structure is not just per node, but per node and per memcg. Not all list_lrus need this feature, so this patch also adds a new method, list_lru_init_memcg, which initializes a list_lru as memcg aware. Otherwise (i.e. if initialized with old list_lru_init), the list_lru won't have per memcg lists. Just like per memcg caches arrays, the arrays of per-memcg lists are indexed by memcg_cache_id, so we must grow them whenever memcg_nr_cache_ids is increased. So we introduce a callback, memcg_update_all_list_lrus, invoked by memcg_alloc_cache_id if the id space is full. The locking is implemented in a manner similar to lruvecs, i.e. we have one lock per node that protects all lists (both global and per cgroup) on the node. Signed-off-by: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@parallels.com> Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz> Cc: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com> Cc: Glauber Costa <glommer@gmail.com> Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com> Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2015-02-12 22:59:10 +00:00
#ifdef CONFIG_MEMCG
fs: propagate shrinker::id to list_lru Add list_lru::shrinker_id field and populate it by registered shrinker id. This will be used to set correct bit in memcg shrinkers map by lru code in next patches, after there appeared the first related to memcg element in list_lru. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/153063059758.1818.14866596416857717800.stgit@localhost.localdomain Signed-off-by: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@virtuozzo.com> Acked-by: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com> Tested-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com> Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@virtuozzo.com> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> Cc: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com> Cc: Li RongQing <lirongqing@baidu.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org> Cc: Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@nexb.com> Cc: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com> Cc: Sahitya Tummala <stummala@codeaurora.org> Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Cc: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2018-08-17 22:47:50 +00:00
lru->shrinker_id = -1;
#endif
list_lru: dynamically adjust node arrays We currently use a compile-time constant to size the node array for the list_lru structure. Due to this, we don't need to allocate any memory at initialization time. But as a consequence, the structures that contain embedded list_lru lists can become way too big (the superblock for instance contains two of them). This patch aims at ameliorating this situation by dynamically allocating the node arrays with the firmware provided nr_node_ids. Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <glommer@openvz.org> Cc: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com> Cc: Arve Hjønnevåg <arve@android.com> Cc: Carlos Maiolino <cmaiolino@redhat.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com> Cc: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com> Cc: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Cc: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com> Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org> Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> Cc: Kent Overstreet <koverstreet@google.com> Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Cc: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com> Cc: Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@vmware.com> Cc: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2013-08-28 00:18:18 +00:00
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(list_lru_destroy);