548 lines
12 KiB
C
Raw Permalink Normal View History

// SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
/* Copyright (C) 2017-2018 Netronome Systems, Inc. */
#include <ctype.h>
#include <errno.h>
#include <getopt.h>
#include <linux/bpf.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <string.h>
#include <bpf/bpf.h>
#include <bpf/btf.h>
#include <bpf/hashmap.h>
#include <bpf/libbpf.h>
#include "main.h"
#define BATCH_LINE_LEN_MAX 65536
#define BATCH_ARG_NB_MAX 4096
const char *bin_name;
static int last_argc;
static char **last_argv;
static int (*last_do_help)(int argc, char **argv);
json_writer_t *json_wtr;
bool pretty_output;
bool json_output;
bool show_pinned;
bool block_mount;
tools: bpftool: make -d option print debug output from verifier The "-d" option is used to require all logs available for bpftool. So far it meant telling libbpf to print even debug-level information. But there is another source of info that can be made more verbose: when we attemt to load programs with bpftool, we can pass a log_level parameter to the verifier in order to control the amount of information that is printed to the console. Reuse the "-d" option to print all information the verifier can tell. At this time, this means logs related to BPF_LOG_LEVEL1, BPF_LOG_LEVEL2 and BPF_LOG_STATS. As mentioned in the discussion on the first version of this set, these macros are internal to the kernel (include/linux/bpf_verifier.h) and are not meant to be part of the stable user API, therefore we simply use the related constants to print whatever we can at this time, without trying to tell users what is log_level1 or what is statistics. Verifier logs are only used when loading programs for now (In the future: for loading BTF objects with bpftool? Although libbpf does not currently offer to print verifier info at debug level if no error occurred when loading BTF objects), so bpftool.rst and bpftool-prog.rst are the only man pages to get the update. v3: - Add details on log level and BTF loading at the end of commit log. v2: - Remove the possibility to select the log levels to use (v1 offered a combination of "log_level1", "log_level2" and "stats"). - The macros from kernel header bpf_verifier.h are not used (and therefore not moved to UAPI header). - In v1 this was a distinct option, but is now merged in the only "-d" switch to activate libbpf and verifier debug-level logs all at the same time. Signed-off-by: Quentin Monnet <quentin.monnet@netronome.com> Reviewed-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2019-05-24 11:36:48 +01:00
bool verifier_logs;
bool relaxed_maps;
bpftool: Use syscall/loader program in "prog load" and "gen skeleton" command. Add -L flag to bpftool to use libbpf gen_trace facility and syscall/loader program for skeleton generation and program loading. "bpftool gen skeleton -L" command will generate a "light skeleton" or "loader skeleton" that is similar to existing skeleton, but has one major difference: $ bpftool gen skeleton lsm.o > lsm.skel.h $ bpftool gen skeleton -L lsm.o > lsm.lskel.h $ diff lsm.skel.h lsm.lskel.h @@ -5,34 +4,34 @@ #define __LSM_SKEL_H__ #include <stdlib.h> -#include <bpf/libbpf.h> +#include <bpf/bpf.h> The light skeleton does not use majority of libbpf infrastructure. It doesn't need libelf. It doesn't parse .o file. It only needs few sys_bpf wrappers. All of them are in bpf/bpf.h file. In future libbpf/bpf.c can be inlined into bpf.h, so not even libbpf.a would be needed to work with light skeleton. "bpftool prog load -L file.o" command is introduced for debugging of syscall/loader program generation. Just like the same command without -L it will try to load the programs from file.o into the kernel. It won't even try to pin them. "bpftool prog load -L -d file.o" command will provide additional debug messages on how syscall/loader program was generated. Also the execution of syscall/loader program will use bpf_trace_printk() for each step of loading BTF, creating maps, and loading programs. The user can do "cat /.../trace_pipe" for further debug. An example of fexit_sleep.lskel.h generated from progs/fexit_sleep.c: struct fexit_sleep { struct bpf_loader_ctx ctx; struct { struct bpf_map_desc bss; } maps; struct { struct bpf_prog_desc nanosleep_fentry; struct bpf_prog_desc nanosleep_fexit; } progs; struct { int nanosleep_fentry_fd; int nanosleep_fexit_fd; } links; struct fexit_sleep__bss { int pid; int fentry_cnt; int fexit_cnt; } *bss; }; Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210514003623.28033-18-alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com
2021-05-13 17:36:19 -07:00
bool use_loader;
struct btf *base_btf;
struct hashmap *refs_table;
static void __noreturn clean_and_exit(int i)
{
if (json_output)
jsonw_destroy(&json_wtr);
exit(i);
}
void usage(void)
{
last_do_help(last_argc - 1, last_argv + 1);
clean_and_exit(-1);
}
static int do_help(int argc, char **argv)
{
if (json_output) {
jsonw_null(json_wtr);
return 0;
}
fprintf(stderr,
"Usage: %s [OPTIONS] OBJECT { COMMAND | help }\n"
" %s batch file FILE\n"
" %s version\n"
"\n"
2020-05-09 10:59:20 -07:00
" OBJECT := { prog | map | link | cgroup | perf | net | feature | btf | gen | struct_ops | iter }\n"
" " HELP_SPEC_OPTIONS " |\n"
" {-V|--version} }\n"
"",
bin_name, bin_name, bin_name);
return 0;
}
static int do_batch(int argc, char **argv);
static int do_version(int argc, char **argv);
static const struct cmd commands[] = {
{ "help", do_help },
{ "batch", do_batch },
{ "prog", do_prog },
{ "map", do_map },
{ "link", do_link },
{ "cgroup", do_cgroup },
{ "perf", do_perf },
{ "net", do_net },
{ "feature", do_feature },
{ "btf", do_btf },
{ "gen", do_gen },
{ "struct_ops", do_struct_ops },
{ "iter", do_iter },
{ "version", do_version },
{ 0 }
};
bpftool: Update versioning scheme, align on libbpf's version number Since the notion of versions was introduced for bpftool, it has been following the version number of the kernel (using the version number corresponding to the tree in which bpftool's sources are located). The rationale was that bpftool's features are loosely tied to BPF features in the kernel, and that we could defer versioning to the kernel repository itself. But this versioning scheme is confusing today, because a bpftool binary should be able to work with both older and newer kernels, even if some of its recent features won't be available on older systems. Furthermore, if bpftool is ported to other systems in the future, keeping a Linux-based version number is not a good option. Looking at other options, we could either have a totally independent scheme for bpftool, or we could align it on libbpf's version number (with an offset on the major version number, to avoid going backwards). The latter comes with a few drawbacks: - We may want bpftool releases in-between two libbpf versions. We can always append pre-release numbers to distinguish versions, although those won't look as "official" as something with a proper release number. But at the same time, having bpftool with version numbers that look "official" hasn't really been an issue so far. - If no new feature lands in bpftool for some time, we may move from e.g. 6.7.0 to 6.8.0 when libbpf levels up and have two different versions which are in fact the same. - Following libbpf's versioning scheme sounds better than kernel's, but ultimately it doesn't make too much sense either, because even though bpftool uses the lib a lot, its behaviour is not that much conditioned by the internal evolution of the library (or by new APIs that it may not use). Having an independent versioning scheme solves the above, but at the cost of heavier maintenance. Developers will likely forget to increase the numbers when adding features or bug fixes, and we would take the risk of having to send occasional "catch-up" patches just to update the version number. Based on these considerations, this patch aligns bpftool's version number on libbpf's. This is not a perfect solution, but 1) it's certainly an improvement over the current scheme, 2) the issues raised above are all minor at the moment, and 3) we can still move to an independent scheme in the future if we realise we need it. Given that libbpf is currently at version 0.7.0, and bpftool, before this patch, was at 5.16, we use an offset of 6 for the major version, bumping bpftool to 6.7.0. Libbpf does not export its patch number; leave bpftool's patch number at 0 for now. It remains possible to manually override the version number by setting BPFTOOL_VERSION when calling make. Signed-off-by: Quentin Monnet <quentin@isovalent.com> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220210104237.11649-3-quentin@isovalent.com
2022-02-10 10:42:37 +00:00
#ifndef BPFTOOL_VERSION
/* bpftool's major and minor version numbers are aligned on libbpf's. There is
* an offset of 6 for the version number, because bpftool's version was higher
* than libbpf's when we adopted this scheme. The patch number remains at 0
* for now. Set BPFTOOL_VERSION to override.
*/
#define BPFTOOL_MAJOR_VERSION (LIBBPF_MAJOR_VERSION + 6)
#define BPFTOOL_MINOR_VERSION LIBBPF_MINOR_VERSION
#define BPFTOOL_PATCH_VERSION 0
#endif
static void
print_feature(const char *feature, bool state, unsigned int *nb_features)
{
if (state) {
printf("%s %s", *nb_features ? "," : "", feature);
*nb_features = *nb_features + 1;
}
}
static int do_version(int argc, char **argv)
{
tools: bpftool: Print optional built-in features along with version Bpftool has a number of features that can be included or left aside during compilation. This includes: - Support for libbfd, providing the disassembler for JIT-compiled programs. - Support for BPF skeletons, used for profiling programs or iterating on the PIDs of processes associated with BPF objects. In order to make it easy for users to understand what features were compiled for a given bpftool binary, print the status of the two features above when showing the version number for bpftool ("bpftool -V" or "bpftool version"). Document this in the main manual page. Example invocations: $ bpftool version ./bpftool v5.9.0-rc1 features: libbfd, skeletons $ bpftool -p version { "version": "5.9.0-rc1", "features": { "libbfd": true, "skeletons": true } } Some other parameters are optional at compilation ("DISASM_FOUR_ARGS_SIGNATURE", LIBCAP support) but they do not impact significantly bpftool's behaviour from a user's point of view, so their status is not reported. Available commands and supported program types depend on the version number, and are therefore not reported either. Note that they are already available, albeit without JSON, via bpftool's help messages. v3: - Use a simple list instead of boolean values for plain output. v2: - Fix JSON (object instead or array for the features). Signed-off-by: Quentin Monnet <quentin@isovalent.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200909162500.17010-2-quentin@isovalent.com
2020-09-09 17:24:58 +01:00
#ifdef HAVE_LIBBFD_SUPPORT
const bool has_libbfd = true;
#else
const bool has_libbfd = false;
#endif
#ifdef HAVE_LLVM_SUPPORT
const bool has_llvm = true;
#else
const bool has_llvm = false;
#endif
tools: bpftool: Print optional built-in features along with version Bpftool has a number of features that can be included or left aside during compilation. This includes: - Support for libbfd, providing the disassembler for JIT-compiled programs. - Support for BPF skeletons, used for profiling programs or iterating on the PIDs of processes associated with BPF objects. In order to make it easy for users to understand what features were compiled for a given bpftool binary, print the status of the two features above when showing the version number for bpftool ("bpftool -V" or "bpftool version"). Document this in the main manual page. Example invocations: $ bpftool version ./bpftool v5.9.0-rc1 features: libbfd, skeletons $ bpftool -p version { "version": "5.9.0-rc1", "features": { "libbfd": true, "skeletons": true } } Some other parameters are optional at compilation ("DISASM_FOUR_ARGS_SIGNATURE", LIBCAP support) but they do not impact significantly bpftool's behaviour from a user's point of view, so their status is not reported. Available commands and supported program types depend on the version number, and are therefore not reported either. Note that they are already available, albeit without JSON, via bpftool's help messages. v3: - Use a simple list instead of boolean values for plain output. v2: - Fix JSON (object instead or array for the features). Signed-off-by: Quentin Monnet <quentin@isovalent.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200909162500.17010-2-quentin@isovalent.com
2020-09-09 17:24:58 +01:00
#ifdef BPFTOOL_WITHOUT_SKELETONS
const bool has_skeletons = false;
#else
const bool has_skeletons = true;
#endif
bool bootstrap = false;
int i;
for (i = 0; commands[i].cmd; i++) {
if (!strcmp(commands[i].cmd, "prog")) {
/* Assume we run a bootstrap version if "bpftool prog"
* is not available.
*/
bootstrap = !commands[i].func;
break;
}
}
tools: bpftool: Print optional built-in features along with version Bpftool has a number of features that can be included or left aside during compilation. This includes: - Support for libbfd, providing the disassembler for JIT-compiled programs. - Support for BPF skeletons, used for profiling programs or iterating on the PIDs of processes associated with BPF objects. In order to make it easy for users to understand what features were compiled for a given bpftool binary, print the status of the two features above when showing the version number for bpftool ("bpftool -V" or "bpftool version"). Document this in the main manual page. Example invocations: $ bpftool version ./bpftool v5.9.0-rc1 features: libbfd, skeletons $ bpftool -p version { "version": "5.9.0-rc1", "features": { "libbfd": true, "skeletons": true } } Some other parameters are optional at compilation ("DISASM_FOUR_ARGS_SIGNATURE", LIBCAP support) but they do not impact significantly bpftool's behaviour from a user's point of view, so their status is not reported. Available commands and supported program types depend on the version number, and are therefore not reported either. Note that they are already available, albeit without JSON, via bpftool's help messages. v3: - Use a simple list instead of boolean values for plain output. v2: - Fix JSON (object instead or array for the features). Signed-off-by: Quentin Monnet <quentin@isovalent.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200909162500.17010-2-quentin@isovalent.com
2020-09-09 17:24:58 +01:00
if (json_output) {
tools: bpftool: Print optional built-in features along with version Bpftool has a number of features that can be included or left aside during compilation. This includes: - Support for libbfd, providing the disassembler for JIT-compiled programs. - Support for BPF skeletons, used for profiling programs or iterating on the PIDs of processes associated with BPF objects. In order to make it easy for users to understand what features were compiled for a given bpftool binary, print the status of the two features above when showing the version number for bpftool ("bpftool -V" or "bpftool version"). Document this in the main manual page. Example invocations: $ bpftool version ./bpftool v5.9.0-rc1 features: libbfd, skeletons $ bpftool -p version { "version": "5.9.0-rc1", "features": { "libbfd": true, "skeletons": true } } Some other parameters are optional at compilation ("DISASM_FOUR_ARGS_SIGNATURE", LIBCAP support) but they do not impact significantly bpftool's behaviour from a user's point of view, so their status is not reported. Available commands and supported program types depend on the version number, and are therefore not reported either. Note that they are already available, albeit without JSON, via bpftool's help messages. v3: - Use a simple list instead of boolean values for plain output. v2: - Fix JSON (object instead or array for the features). Signed-off-by: Quentin Monnet <quentin@isovalent.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200909162500.17010-2-quentin@isovalent.com
2020-09-09 17:24:58 +01:00
jsonw_start_object(json_wtr); /* root object */
jsonw_name(json_wtr, "version");
bpftool: Update versioning scheme, align on libbpf's version number Since the notion of versions was introduced for bpftool, it has been following the version number of the kernel (using the version number corresponding to the tree in which bpftool's sources are located). The rationale was that bpftool's features are loosely tied to BPF features in the kernel, and that we could defer versioning to the kernel repository itself. But this versioning scheme is confusing today, because a bpftool binary should be able to work with both older and newer kernels, even if some of its recent features won't be available on older systems. Furthermore, if bpftool is ported to other systems in the future, keeping a Linux-based version number is not a good option. Looking at other options, we could either have a totally independent scheme for bpftool, or we could align it on libbpf's version number (with an offset on the major version number, to avoid going backwards). The latter comes with a few drawbacks: - We may want bpftool releases in-between two libbpf versions. We can always append pre-release numbers to distinguish versions, although those won't look as "official" as something with a proper release number. But at the same time, having bpftool with version numbers that look "official" hasn't really been an issue so far. - If no new feature lands in bpftool for some time, we may move from e.g. 6.7.0 to 6.8.0 when libbpf levels up and have two different versions which are in fact the same. - Following libbpf's versioning scheme sounds better than kernel's, but ultimately it doesn't make too much sense either, because even though bpftool uses the lib a lot, its behaviour is not that much conditioned by the internal evolution of the library (or by new APIs that it may not use). Having an independent versioning scheme solves the above, but at the cost of heavier maintenance. Developers will likely forget to increase the numbers when adding features or bug fixes, and we would take the risk of having to send occasional "catch-up" patches just to update the version number. Based on these considerations, this patch aligns bpftool's version number on libbpf's. This is not a perfect solution, but 1) it's certainly an improvement over the current scheme, 2) the issues raised above are all minor at the moment, and 3) we can still move to an independent scheme in the future if we realise we need it. Given that libbpf is currently at version 0.7.0, and bpftool, before this patch, was at 5.16, we use an offset of 6 for the major version, bumping bpftool to 6.7.0. Libbpf does not export its patch number; leave bpftool's patch number at 0 for now. It remains possible to manually override the version number by setting BPFTOOL_VERSION when calling make. Signed-off-by: Quentin Monnet <quentin@isovalent.com> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220210104237.11649-3-quentin@isovalent.com
2022-02-10 10:42:37 +00:00
#ifdef BPFTOOL_VERSION
jsonw_printf(json_wtr, "\"%s\"", BPFTOOL_VERSION);
bpftool: Update versioning scheme, align on libbpf's version number Since the notion of versions was introduced for bpftool, it has been following the version number of the kernel (using the version number corresponding to the tree in which bpftool's sources are located). The rationale was that bpftool's features are loosely tied to BPF features in the kernel, and that we could defer versioning to the kernel repository itself. But this versioning scheme is confusing today, because a bpftool binary should be able to work with both older and newer kernels, even if some of its recent features won't be available on older systems. Furthermore, if bpftool is ported to other systems in the future, keeping a Linux-based version number is not a good option. Looking at other options, we could either have a totally independent scheme for bpftool, or we could align it on libbpf's version number (with an offset on the major version number, to avoid going backwards). The latter comes with a few drawbacks: - We may want bpftool releases in-between two libbpf versions. We can always append pre-release numbers to distinguish versions, although those won't look as "official" as something with a proper release number. But at the same time, having bpftool with version numbers that look "official" hasn't really been an issue so far. - If no new feature lands in bpftool for some time, we may move from e.g. 6.7.0 to 6.8.0 when libbpf levels up and have two different versions which are in fact the same. - Following libbpf's versioning scheme sounds better than kernel's, but ultimately it doesn't make too much sense either, because even though bpftool uses the lib a lot, its behaviour is not that much conditioned by the internal evolution of the library (or by new APIs that it may not use). Having an independent versioning scheme solves the above, but at the cost of heavier maintenance. Developers will likely forget to increase the numbers when adding features or bug fixes, and we would take the risk of having to send occasional "catch-up" patches just to update the version number. Based on these considerations, this patch aligns bpftool's version number on libbpf's. This is not a perfect solution, but 1) it's certainly an improvement over the current scheme, 2) the issues raised above are all minor at the moment, and 3) we can still move to an independent scheme in the future if we realise we need it. Given that libbpf is currently at version 0.7.0, and bpftool, before this patch, was at 5.16, we use an offset of 6 for the major version, bumping bpftool to 6.7.0. Libbpf does not export its patch number; leave bpftool's patch number at 0 for now. It remains possible to manually override the version number by setting BPFTOOL_VERSION when calling make. Signed-off-by: Quentin Monnet <quentin@isovalent.com> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220210104237.11649-3-quentin@isovalent.com
2022-02-10 10:42:37 +00:00
#else
jsonw_printf(json_wtr, "\"%d.%d.%d\"", BPFTOOL_MAJOR_VERSION,
BPFTOOL_MINOR_VERSION, BPFTOOL_PATCH_VERSION);
#endif
jsonw_name(json_wtr, "libbpf_version");
jsonw_printf(json_wtr, "\"%d.%d\"",
libbpf_major_version(), libbpf_minor_version());
tools: bpftool: Print optional built-in features along with version Bpftool has a number of features that can be included or left aside during compilation. This includes: - Support for libbfd, providing the disassembler for JIT-compiled programs. - Support for BPF skeletons, used for profiling programs or iterating on the PIDs of processes associated with BPF objects. In order to make it easy for users to understand what features were compiled for a given bpftool binary, print the status of the two features above when showing the version number for bpftool ("bpftool -V" or "bpftool version"). Document this in the main manual page. Example invocations: $ bpftool version ./bpftool v5.9.0-rc1 features: libbfd, skeletons $ bpftool -p version { "version": "5.9.0-rc1", "features": { "libbfd": true, "skeletons": true } } Some other parameters are optional at compilation ("DISASM_FOUR_ARGS_SIGNATURE", LIBCAP support) but they do not impact significantly bpftool's behaviour from a user's point of view, so their status is not reported. Available commands and supported program types depend on the version number, and are therefore not reported either. Note that they are already available, albeit without JSON, via bpftool's help messages. v3: - Use a simple list instead of boolean values for plain output. v2: - Fix JSON (object instead or array for the features). Signed-off-by: Quentin Monnet <quentin@isovalent.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200909162500.17010-2-quentin@isovalent.com
2020-09-09 17:24:58 +01:00
jsonw_name(json_wtr, "features");
jsonw_start_object(json_wtr); /* features */
jsonw_bool_field(json_wtr, "libbfd", has_libbfd);
jsonw_bool_field(json_wtr, "llvm", has_llvm);
tools: bpftool: Print optional built-in features along with version Bpftool has a number of features that can be included or left aside during compilation. This includes: - Support for libbfd, providing the disassembler for JIT-compiled programs. - Support for BPF skeletons, used for profiling programs or iterating on the PIDs of processes associated with BPF objects. In order to make it easy for users to understand what features were compiled for a given bpftool binary, print the status of the two features above when showing the version number for bpftool ("bpftool -V" or "bpftool version"). Document this in the main manual page. Example invocations: $ bpftool version ./bpftool v5.9.0-rc1 features: libbfd, skeletons $ bpftool -p version { "version": "5.9.0-rc1", "features": { "libbfd": true, "skeletons": true } } Some other parameters are optional at compilation ("DISASM_FOUR_ARGS_SIGNATURE", LIBCAP support) but they do not impact significantly bpftool's behaviour from a user's point of view, so their status is not reported. Available commands and supported program types depend on the version number, and are therefore not reported either. Note that they are already available, albeit without JSON, via bpftool's help messages. v3: - Use a simple list instead of boolean values for plain output. v2: - Fix JSON (object instead or array for the features). Signed-off-by: Quentin Monnet <quentin@isovalent.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200909162500.17010-2-quentin@isovalent.com
2020-09-09 17:24:58 +01:00
jsonw_bool_field(json_wtr, "skeletons", has_skeletons);
jsonw_bool_field(json_wtr, "bootstrap", bootstrap);
tools: bpftool: Print optional built-in features along with version Bpftool has a number of features that can be included or left aside during compilation. This includes: - Support for libbfd, providing the disassembler for JIT-compiled programs. - Support for BPF skeletons, used for profiling programs or iterating on the PIDs of processes associated with BPF objects. In order to make it easy for users to understand what features were compiled for a given bpftool binary, print the status of the two features above when showing the version number for bpftool ("bpftool -V" or "bpftool version"). Document this in the main manual page. Example invocations: $ bpftool version ./bpftool v5.9.0-rc1 features: libbfd, skeletons $ bpftool -p version { "version": "5.9.0-rc1", "features": { "libbfd": true, "skeletons": true } } Some other parameters are optional at compilation ("DISASM_FOUR_ARGS_SIGNATURE", LIBCAP support) but they do not impact significantly bpftool's behaviour from a user's point of view, so their status is not reported. Available commands and supported program types depend on the version number, and are therefore not reported either. Note that they are already available, albeit without JSON, via bpftool's help messages. v3: - Use a simple list instead of boolean values for plain output. v2: - Fix JSON (object instead or array for the features). Signed-off-by: Quentin Monnet <quentin@isovalent.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200909162500.17010-2-quentin@isovalent.com
2020-09-09 17:24:58 +01:00
jsonw_end_object(json_wtr); /* features */
jsonw_end_object(json_wtr); /* root object */
} else {
tools: bpftool: Print optional built-in features along with version Bpftool has a number of features that can be included or left aside during compilation. This includes: - Support for libbfd, providing the disassembler for JIT-compiled programs. - Support for BPF skeletons, used for profiling programs or iterating on the PIDs of processes associated with BPF objects. In order to make it easy for users to understand what features were compiled for a given bpftool binary, print the status of the two features above when showing the version number for bpftool ("bpftool -V" or "bpftool version"). Document this in the main manual page. Example invocations: $ bpftool version ./bpftool v5.9.0-rc1 features: libbfd, skeletons $ bpftool -p version { "version": "5.9.0-rc1", "features": { "libbfd": true, "skeletons": true } } Some other parameters are optional at compilation ("DISASM_FOUR_ARGS_SIGNATURE", LIBCAP support) but they do not impact significantly bpftool's behaviour from a user's point of view, so their status is not reported. Available commands and supported program types depend on the version number, and are therefore not reported either. Note that they are already available, albeit without JSON, via bpftool's help messages. v3: - Use a simple list instead of boolean values for plain output. v2: - Fix JSON (object instead or array for the features). Signed-off-by: Quentin Monnet <quentin@isovalent.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200909162500.17010-2-quentin@isovalent.com
2020-09-09 17:24:58 +01:00
unsigned int nb_features = 0;
bpftool: Update versioning scheme, align on libbpf's version number Since the notion of versions was introduced for bpftool, it has been following the version number of the kernel (using the version number corresponding to the tree in which bpftool's sources are located). The rationale was that bpftool's features are loosely tied to BPF features in the kernel, and that we could defer versioning to the kernel repository itself. But this versioning scheme is confusing today, because a bpftool binary should be able to work with both older and newer kernels, even if some of its recent features won't be available on older systems. Furthermore, if bpftool is ported to other systems in the future, keeping a Linux-based version number is not a good option. Looking at other options, we could either have a totally independent scheme for bpftool, or we could align it on libbpf's version number (with an offset on the major version number, to avoid going backwards). The latter comes with a few drawbacks: - We may want bpftool releases in-between two libbpf versions. We can always append pre-release numbers to distinguish versions, although those won't look as "official" as something with a proper release number. But at the same time, having bpftool with version numbers that look "official" hasn't really been an issue so far. - If no new feature lands in bpftool for some time, we may move from e.g. 6.7.0 to 6.8.0 when libbpf levels up and have two different versions which are in fact the same. - Following libbpf's versioning scheme sounds better than kernel's, but ultimately it doesn't make too much sense either, because even though bpftool uses the lib a lot, its behaviour is not that much conditioned by the internal evolution of the library (or by new APIs that it may not use). Having an independent versioning scheme solves the above, but at the cost of heavier maintenance. Developers will likely forget to increase the numbers when adding features or bug fixes, and we would take the risk of having to send occasional "catch-up" patches just to update the version number. Based on these considerations, this patch aligns bpftool's version number on libbpf's. This is not a perfect solution, but 1) it's certainly an improvement over the current scheme, 2) the issues raised above are all minor at the moment, and 3) we can still move to an independent scheme in the future if we realise we need it. Given that libbpf is currently at version 0.7.0, and bpftool, before this patch, was at 5.16, we use an offset of 6 for the major version, bumping bpftool to 6.7.0. Libbpf does not export its patch number; leave bpftool's patch number at 0 for now. It remains possible to manually override the version number by setting BPFTOOL_VERSION when calling make. Signed-off-by: Quentin Monnet <quentin@isovalent.com> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220210104237.11649-3-quentin@isovalent.com
2022-02-10 10:42:37 +00:00
#ifdef BPFTOOL_VERSION
printf("%s v%s\n", bin_name, BPFTOOL_VERSION);
bpftool: Update versioning scheme, align on libbpf's version number Since the notion of versions was introduced for bpftool, it has been following the version number of the kernel (using the version number corresponding to the tree in which bpftool's sources are located). The rationale was that bpftool's features are loosely tied to BPF features in the kernel, and that we could defer versioning to the kernel repository itself. But this versioning scheme is confusing today, because a bpftool binary should be able to work with both older and newer kernels, even if some of its recent features won't be available on older systems. Furthermore, if bpftool is ported to other systems in the future, keeping a Linux-based version number is not a good option. Looking at other options, we could either have a totally independent scheme for bpftool, or we could align it on libbpf's version number (with an offset on the major version number, to avoid going backwards). The latter comes with a few drawbacks: - We may want bpftool releases in-between two libbpf versions. We can always append pre-release numbers to distinguish versions, although those won't look as "official" as something with a proper release number. But at the same time, having bpftool with version numbers that look "official" hasn't really been an issue so far. - If no new feature lands in bpftool for some time, we may move from e.g. 6.7.0 to 6.8.0 when libbpf levels up and have two different versions which are in fact the same. - Following libbpf's versioning scheme sounds better than kernel's, but ultimately it doesn't make too much sense either, because even though bpftool uses the lib a lot, its behaviour is not that much conditioned by the internal evolution of the library (or by new APIs that it may not use). Having an independent versioning scheme solves the above, but at the cost of heavier maintenance. Developers will likely forget to increase the numbers when adding features or bug fixes, and we would take the risk of having to send occasional "catch-up" patches just to update the version number. Based on these considerations, this patch aligns bpftool's version number on libbpf's. This is not a perfect solution, but 1) it's certainly an improvement over the current scheme, 2) the issues raised above are all minor at the moment, and 3) we can still move to an independent scheme in the future if we realise we need it. Given that libbpf is currently at version 0.7.0, and bpftool, before this patch, was at 5.16, we use an offset of 6 for the major version, bumping bpftool to 6.7.0. Libbpf does not export its patch number; leave bpftool's patch number at 0 for now. It remains possible to manually override the version number by setting BPFTOOL_VERSION when calling make. Signed-off-by: Quentin Monnet <quentin@isovalent.com> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220210104237.11649-3-quentin@isovalent.com
2022-02-10 10:42:37 +00:00
#else
printf("%s v%d.%d.%d\n", bin_name, BPFTOOL_MAJOR_VERSION,
BPFTOOL_MINOR_VERSION, BPFTOOL_PATCH_VERSION);
#endif
printf("using libbpf %s\n", libbpf_version_string());
tools: bpftool: Print optional built-in features along with version Bpftool has a number of features that can be included or left aside during compilation. This includes: - Support for libbfd, providing the disassembler for JIT-compiled programs. - Support for BPF skeletons, used for profiling programs or iterating on the PIDs of processes associated with BPF objects. In order to make it easy for users to understand what features were compiled for a given bpftool binary, print the status of the two features above when showing the version number for bpftool ("bpftool -V" or "bpftool version"). Document this in the main manual page. Example invocations: $ bpftool version ./bpftool v5.9.0-rc1 features: libbfd, skeletons $ bpftool -p version { "version": "5.9.0-rc1", "features": { "libbfd": true, "skeletons": true } } Some other parameters are optional at compilation ("DISASM_FOUR_ARGS_SIGNATURE", LIBCAP support) but they do not impact significantly bpftool's behaviour from a user's point of view, so their status is not reported. Available commands and supported program types depend on the version number, and are therefore not reported either. Note that they are already available, albeit without JSON, via bpftool's help messages. v3: - Use a simple list instead of boolean values for plain output. v2: - Fix JSON (object instead or array for the features). Signed-off-by: Quentin Monnet <quentin@isovalent.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200909162500.17010-2-quentin@isovalent.com
2020-09-09 17:24:58 +01:00
printf("features:");
print_feature("libbfd", has_libbfd, &nb_features);
print_feature("llvm", has_llvm, &nb_features);
print_feature("skeletons", has_skeletons, &nb_features);
print_feature("bootstrap", bootstrap, &nb_features);
tools: bpftool: Print optional built-in features along with version Bpftool has a number of features that can be included or left aside during compilation. This includes: - Support for libbfd, providing the disassembler for JIT-compiled programs. - Support for BPF skeletons, used for profiling programs or iterating on the PIDs of processes associated with BPF objects. In order to make it easy for users to understand what features were compiled for a given bpftool binary, print the status of the two features above when showing the version number for bpftool ("bpftool -V" or "bpftool version"). Document this in the main manual page. Example invocations: $ bpftool version ./bpftool v5.9.0-rc1 features: libbfd, skeletons $ bpftool -p version { "version": "5.9.0-rc1", "features": { "libbfd": true, "skeletons": true } } Some other parameters are optional at compilation ("DISASM_FOUR_ARGS_SIGNATURE", LIBCAP support) but they do not impact significantly bpftool's behaviour from a user's point of view, so their status is not reported. Available commands and supported program types depend on the version number, and are therefore not reported either. Note that they are already available, albeit without JSON, via bpftool's help messages. v3: - Use a simple list instead of boolean values for plain output. v2: - Fix JSON (object instead or array for the features). Signed-off-by: Quentin Monnet <quentin@isovalent.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200909162500.17010-2-quentin@isovalent.com
2020-09-09 17:24:58 +01:00
printf("\n");
}
return 0;
}
int cmd_select(const struct cmd *cmds, int argc, char **argv,
int (*help)(int argc, char **argv))
{
unsigned int i;
last_argc = argc;
last_argv = argv;
last_do_help = help;
if (argc < 1 && cmds[0].func)
return cmds[0].func(argc, argv);
for (i = 0; cmds[i].cmd; i++) {
if (is_prefix(*argv, cmds[i].cmd)) {
if (!cmds[i].func) {
p_err("command '%s' is not supported in bootstrap mode",
cmds[i].cmd);
return -1;
}
return cmds[i].func(argc - 1, argv + 1);
}
}
help(argc - 1, argv + 1);
return -1;
}
bool is_prefix(const char *pfx, const char *str)
{
if (!pfx)
return false;
if (strlen(str) < strlen(pfx))
return false;
return !memcmp(str, pfx, strlen(pfx));
}
/* Last argument MUST be NULL pointer */
int detect_common_prefix(const char *arg, ...)
{
unsigned int count = 0;
const char *ref;
char msg[256];
va_list ap;
snprintf(msg, sizeof(msg), "ambiguous prefix: '%s' could be '", arg);
va_start(ap, arg);
while ((ref = va_arg(ap, const char *))) {
if (!is_prefix(arg, ref))
continue;
count++;
if (count > 1)
strncat(msg, "' or '", sizeof(msg) - strlen(msg) - 1);
strncat(msg, ref, sizeof(msg) - strlen(msg) - 1);
}
va_end(ap);
strncat(msg, "'", sizeof(msg) - strlen(msg) - 1);
if (count >= 2) {
p_err("%s", msg);
return -1;
}
return 0;
}
void fprint_hex(FILE *f, void *arg, unsigned int n, const char *sep)
{
unsigned char *data = arg;
unsigned int i;
for (i = 0; i < n; i++) {
const char *pfx = "";
if (!i)
/* nothing */;
else if (!(i % 16))
fprintf(f, "\n");
else if (!(i % 8))
fprintf(f, " ");
else
pfx = sep;
fprintf(f, "%s%02hhx", i ? pfx : "", data[i]);
}
}
/* Split command line into argument vector. */
static int make_args(char *line, char *n_argv[], int maxargs, int cmd_nb)
{
static const char ws[] = " \t\r\n";
char *cp = line;
int n_argc = 0;
while (*cp) {
/* Skip leading whitespace. */
cp += strspn(cp, ws);
if (*cp == '\0')
break;
if (n_argc >= (maxargs - 1)) {
p_err("too many arguments to command %d", cmd_nb);
return -1;
}
/* Word begins with quote. */
if (*cp == '\'' || *cp == '"') {
char quote = *cp++;
n_argv[n_argc++] = cp;
/* Find ending quote. */
cp = strchr(cp, quote);
if (!cp) {
p_err("unterminated quoted string in command %d",
cmd_nb);
return -1;
}
} else {
n_argv[n_argc++] = cp;
/* Find end of word. */
cp += strcspn(cp, ws);
if (*cp == '\0')
break;
}
/* Separate words. */
*cp++ = 0;
}
n_argv[n_argc] = NULL;
return n_argc;
}
static int do_batch(int argc, char **argv)
{
char buf[BATCH_LINE_LEN_MAX], contline[BATCH_LINE_LEN_MAX];
char *n_argv[BATCH_ARG_NB_MAX];
unsigned int lines = 0;
int n_argc;
FILE *fp;
char *cp;
int err = 0;
int i;
if (argc < 2) {
p_err("too few parameters for batch");
return -1;
} else if (argc > 2) {
p_err("too many parameters for batch");
return -1;
} else if (!is_prefix(*argv, "file")) {
p_err("expected 'file', got: %s", *argv);
return -1;
}
NEXT_ARG();
if (!strcmp(*argv, "-"))
fp = stdin;
else
fp = fopen(*argv, "r");
if (!fp) {
p_err("Can't open file (%s): %s", *argv, strerror(errno));
return -1;
}
if (json_output)
jsonw_start_array(json_wtr);
while (fgets(buf, sizeof(buf), fp)) {
cp = strchr(buf, '#');
if (cp)
*cp = '\0';
if (strlen(buf) == sizeof(buf) - 1) {
errno = E2BIG;
break;
}
/* Append continuation lines if any (coming after a line ending
* with '\' in the batch file).
*/
while ((cp = strstr(buf, "\\\n")) != NULL) {
if (!fgets(contline, sizeof(contline), fp) ||
strlen(contline) == 0) {
p_err("missing continuation line on command %d",
lines);
err = -1;
goto err_close;
}
cp = strchr(contline, '#');
if (cp)
*cp = '\0';
if (strlen(buf) + strlen(contline) + 1 > sizeof(buf)) {
p_err("command %d is too long", lines);
err = -1;
goto err_close;
}
buf[strlen(buf) - 2] = '\0';
strcat(buf, contline);
}
n_argc = make_args(buf, n_argv, BATCH_ARG_NB_MAX, lines);
if (!n_argc)
continue;
if (n_argc < 0) {
err = n_argc;
goto err_close;
}
if (json_output) {
jsonw_start_object(json_wtr);
jsonw_name(json_wtr, "command");
jsonw_start_array(json_wtr);
for (i = 0; i < n_argc; i++)
jsonw_string(json_wtr, n_argv[i]);
jsonw_end_array(json_wtr);
jsonw_name(json_wtr, "output");
}
err = cmd_select(commands, n_argc, n_argv, do_help);
if (json_output)
jsonw_end_object(json_wtr);
if (err)
goto err_close;
lines++;
}
if (errno && errno != ENOENT) {
p_err("reading batch file failed: %s", strerror(errno));
err = -1;
} else {
if (!json_output)
printf("processed %d commands\n", lines);
}
err_close:
if (fp != stdin)
fclose(fp);
if (json_output)
jsonw_end_array(json_wtr);
return err;
}
int main(int argc, char **argv)
{
static const struct option options[] = {
{ "json", no_argument, NULL, 'j' },
{ "help", no_argument, NULL, 'h' },
{ "pretty", no_argument, NULL, 'p' },
{ "version", no_argument, NULL, 'V' },
{ "bpffs", no_argument, NULL, 'f' },
{ "mapcompat", no_argument, NULL, 'm' },
{ "nomount", no_argument, NULL, 'n' },
{ "debug", no_argument, NULL, 'd' },
bpftool: Use syscall/loader program in "prog load" and "gen skeleton" command. Add -L flag to bpftool to use libbpf gen_trace facility and syscall/loader program for skeleton generation and program loading. "bpftool gen skeleton -L" command will generate a "light skeleton" or "loader skeleton" that is similar to existing skeleton, but has one major difference: $ bpftool gen skeleton lsm.o > lsm.skel.h $ bpftool gen skeleton -L lsm.o > lsm.lskel.h $ diff lsm.skel.h lsm.lskel.h @@ -5,34 +4,34 @@ #define __LSM_SKEL_H__ #include <stdlib.h> -#include <bpf/libbpf.h> +#include <bpf/bpf.h> The light skeleton does not use majority of libbpf infrastructure. It doesn't need libelf. It doesn't parse .o file. It only needs few sys_bpf wrappers. All of them are in bpf/bpf.h file. In future libbpf/bpf.c can be inlined into bpf.h, so not even libbpf.a would be needed to work with light skeleton. "bpftool prog load -L file.o" command is introduced for debugging of syscall/loader program generation. Just like the same command without -L it will try to load the programs from file.o into the kernel. It won't even try to pin them. "bpftool prog load -L -d file.o" command will provide additional debug messages on how syscall/loader program was generated. Also the execution of syscall/loader program will use bpf_trace_printk() for each step of loading BTF, creating maps, and loading programs. The user can do "cat /.../trace_pipe" for further debug. An example of fexit_sleep.lskel.h generated from progs/fexit_sleep.c: struct fexit_sleep { struct bpf_loader_ctx ctx; struct { struct bpf_map_desc bss; } maps; struct { struct bpf_prog_desc nanosleep_fentry; struct bpf_prog_desc nanosleep_fexit; } progs; struct { int nanosleep_fentry_fd; int nanosleep_fexit_fd; } links; struct fexit_sleep__bss { int pid; int fentry_cnt; int fexit_cnt; } *bss; }; Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210514003623.28033-18-alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com
2021-05-13 17:36:19 -07:00
{ "use-loader", no_argument, NULL, 'L' },
{ "base-btf", required_argument, NULL, 'B' },
{ 0 }
};
bpftool: Add current libbpf_strict mode to version output + bpftool --legacy --version bpftool v5.15.0 features: libbfd, skeletons + bpftool --version bpftool v5.15.0 features: libbfd, libbpf_strict, skeletons + bpftool --legacy --help Usage: bpftool [OPTIONS] OBJECT { COMMAND | help } bpftool batch file FILE bpftool version OBJECT := { prog | map | link | cgroup | perf | net | feature | btf | gen | struct_ops | iter } OPTIONS := { {-j|--json} [{-p|--pretty}] | {-d|--debug} | {-l|--legacy} | {-V|--version} } + bpftool --help Usage: bpftool [OPTIONS] OBJECT { COMMAND | help } bpftool batch file FILE bpftool version OBJECT := { prog | map | link | cgroup | perf | net | feature | btf | gen | struct_ops | iter } OPTIONS := { {-j|--json} [{-p|--pretty}] | {-d|--debug} | {-l|--legacy} | {-V|--version} } + bpftool --legacy Usage: bpftool [OPTIONS] OBJECT { COMMAND | help } bpftool batch file FILE bpftool version OBJECT := { prog | map | link | cgroup | perf | net | feature | btf | gen | struct_ops | iter } OPTIONS := { {-j|--json} [{-p|--pretty}] | {-d|--debug} | {-l|--legacy} | {-V|--version} } + bpftool Usage: bpftool [OPTIONS] OBJECT { COMMAND | help } bpftool batch file FILE bpftool version OBJECT := { prog | map | link | cgroup | perf | net | feature | btf | gen | struct_ops | iter } OPTIONS := { {-j|--json} [{-p|--pretty}] | {-d|--debug} | {-l|--legacy} | {-V|--version} } + bpftool --legacy version bpftool v5.15.0 features: libbfd, skeletons + bpftool version bpftool v5.15.0 features: libbfd, libbpf_strict, skeletons + bpftool --json --legacy version {"version":"5.15.0","features":{"libbfd":true,"libbpf_strict":false,"skeletons":true}} + bpftool --json version {"version":"5.15.0","features":{"libbfd":true,"libbpf_strict":true,"skeletons":true}} Suggested-by: Quentin Monnet <quentin@isovalent.com> Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Reviewed-by: Quentin Monnet <quentin@isovalent.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211116000448.2918854-1-sdf@google.com
2021-11-15 16:04:48 -08:00
bool version_requested = false;
int opt, ret;
setlinebuf(stdout);
bpftool: Clear errno after libcap's checks When bpftool is linked against libcap, the library runs a "constructor" function to compute the number of capabilities of the running kernel [0], at the beginning of the execution of the program. As part of this, it performs multiple calls to prctl(). Some of these may fail, and set errno to a non-zero value: # strace -e prctl ./bpftool version prctl(PR_CAPBSET_READ, CAP_MAC_OVERRIDE) = 1 prctl(PR_CAPBSET_READ, 0x30 /* CAP_??? */) = -1 EINVAL (Invalid argument) prctl(PR_CAPBSET_READ, CAP_CHECKPOINT_RESTORE) = 1 prctl(PR_CAPBSET_READ, 0x2c /* CAP_??? */) = -1 EINVAL (Invalid argument) prctl(PR_CAPBSET_READ, 0x2a /* CAP_??? */) = -1 EINVAL (Invalid argument) prctl(PR_CAPBSET_READ, 0x29 /* CAP_??? */) = -1 EINVAL (Invalid argument) ** fprintf added at the top of main(): we have errno == 1 ./bpftool v7.0.0 using libbpf v1.0 features: libbfd, libbpf_strict, skeletons +++ exited with 0 +++ This has been addressed in libcap 2.63 [1], but until this version is available everywhere, we can fix it on bpftool side. Let's clean errno at the beginning of the main() function, to make sure that these checks do not interfere with the batch mode, where we error out if errno is set after a bpftool command. [0] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/libs/libcap/libcap.git/tree/libcap/cap_alloc.c?h=libcap-2.65#n20 [1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/libs/libcap/libcap.git/commit/?id=f25a1b7e69f7b33e6afb58b3e38f3450b7d2d9a0 Signed-off-by: Quentin Monnet <quentin@isovalent.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220815162205.45043-1-quentin@isovalent.com
2022-08-15 17:22:05 +01:00
#ifdef USE_LIBCAP
/* Libcap < 2.63 hooks before main() to compute the number of
* capabilities of the running kernel, and doing so it calls prctl()
* which may fail and set errno to non-zero.
* Let's reset errno to make sure this does not interfere with the
* batch mode.
*/
errno = 0;
#endif
last_do_help = do_help;
pretty_output = false;
json_output = false;
show_pinned = false;
block_mount = false;
bin_name = "bpftool";
opterr = 0;
while ((opt = getopt_long(argc, argv, "VhpjfLmndB:l",
options, NULL)) >= 0) {
switch (opt) {
case 'V':
bpftool: Add current libbpf_strict mode to version output + bpftool --legacy --version bpftool v5.15.0 features: libbfd, skeletons + bpftool --version bpftool v5.15.0 features: libbfd, libbpf_strict, skeletons + bpftool --legacy --help Usage: bpftool [OPTIONS] OBJECT { COMMAND | help } bpftool batch file FILE bpftool version OBJECT := { prog | map | link | cgroup | perf | net | feature | btf | gen | struct_ops | iter } OPTIONS := { {-j|--json} [{-p|--pretty}] | {-d|--debug} | {-l|--legacy} | {-V|--version} } + bpftool --help Usage: bpftool [OPTIONS] OBJECT { COMMAND | help } bpftool batch file FILE bpftool version OBJECT := { prog | map | link | cgroup | perf | net | feature | btf | gen | struct_ops | iter } OPTIONS := { {-j|--json} [{-p|--pretty}] | {-d|--debug} | {-l|--legacy} | {-V|--version} } + bpftool --legacy Usage: bpftool [OPTIONS] OBJECT { COMMAND | help } bpftool batch file FILE bpftool version OBJECT := { prog | map | link | cgroup | perf | net | feature | btf | gen | struct_ops | iter } OPTIONS := { {-j|--json} [{-p|--pretty}] | {-d|--debug} | {-l|--legacy} | {-V|--version} } + bpftool Usage: bpftool [OPTIONS] OBJECT { COMMAND | help } bpftool batch file FILE bpftool version OBJECT := { prog | map | link | cgroup | perf | net | feature | btf | gen | struct_ops | iter } OPTIONS := { {-j|--json} [{-p|--pretty}] | {-d|--debug} | {-l|--legacy} | {-V|--version} } + bpftool --legacy version bpftool v5.15.0 features: libbfd, skeletons + bpftool version bpftool v5.15.0 features: libbfd, libbpf_strict, skeletons + bpftool --json --legacy version {"version":"5.15.0","features":{"libbfd":true,"libbpf_strict":false,"skeletons":true}} + bpftool --json version {"version":"5.15.0","features":{"libbfd":true,"libbpf_strict":true,"skeletons":true}} Suggested-by: Quentin Monnet <quentin@isovalent.com> Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Reviewed-by: Quentin Monnet <quentin@isovalent.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211116000448.2918854-1-sdf@google.com
2021-11-15 16:04:48 -08:00
version_requested = true;
break;
case 'h':
return do_help(argc, argv);
case 'p':
pretty_output = true;
/* fall through */
case 'j':
if (!json_output) {
json_wtr = jsonw_new(stdout);
if (!json_wtr) {
p_err("failed to create JSON writer");
return -1;
}
json_output = true;
}
jsonw_pretty(json_wtr, pretty_output);
break;
case 'f':
show_pinned = true;
break;
case 'm':
relaxed_maps = true;
break;
case 'n':
block_mount = true;
break;
case 'd':
libbpf_set_print(print_all_levels);
tools: bpftool: make -d option print debug output from verifier The "-d" option is used to require all logs available for bpftool. So far it meant telling libbpf to print even debug-level information. But there is another source of info that can be made more verbose: when we attemt to load programs with bpftool, we can pass a log_level parameter to the verifier in order to control the amount of information that is printed to the console. Reuse the "-d" option to print all information the verifier can tell. At this time, this means logs related to BPF_LOG_LEVEL1, BPF_LOG_LEVEL2 and BPF_LOG_STATS. As mentioned in the discussion on the first version of this set, these macros are internal to the kernel (include/linux/bpf_verifier.h) and are not meant to be part of the stable user API, therefore we simply use the related constants to print whatever we can at this time, without trying to tell users what is log_level1 or what is statistics. Verifier logs are only used when loading programs for now (In the future: for loading BTF objects with bpftool? Although libbpf does not currently offer to print verifier info at debug level if no error occurred when loading BTF objects), so bpftool.rst and bpftool-prog.rst are the only man pages to get the update. v3: - Add details on log level and BTF loading at the end of commit log. v2: - Remove the possibility to select the log levels to use (v1 offered a combination of "log_level1", "log_level2" and "stats"). - The macros from kernel header bpf_verifier.h are not used (and therefore not moved to UAPI header). - In v1 this was a distinct option, but is now merged in the only "-d" switch to activate libbpf and verifier debug-level logs all at the same time. Signed-off-by: Quentin Monnet <quentin.monnet@netronome.com> Reviewed-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
2019-05-24 11:36:48 +01:00
verifier_logs = true;
break;
case 'B':
base_btf = btf__parse(optarg, NULL);
if (!base_btf) {
p_err("failed to parse base BTF at '%s': %d\n",
optarg, -errno);
return -1;
}
break;
bpftool: Use syscall/loader program in "prog load" and "gen skeleton" command. Add -L flag to bpftool to use libbpf gen_trace facility and syscall/loader program for skeleton generation and program loading. "bpftool gen skeleton -L" command will generate a "light skeleton" or "loader skeleton" that is similar to existing skeleton, but has one major difference: $ bpftool gen skeleton lsm.o > lsm.skel.h $ bpftool gen skeleton -L lsm.o > lsm.lskel.h $ diff lsm.skel.h lsm.lskel.h @@ -5,34 +4,34 @@ #define __LSM_SKEL_H__ #include <stdlib.h> -#include <bpf/libbpf.h> +#include <bpf/bpf.h> The light skeleton does not use majority of libbpf infrastructure. It doesn't need libelf. It doesn't parse .o file. It only needs few sys_bpf wrappers. All of them are in bpf/bpf.h file. In future libbpf/bpf.c can be inlined into bpf.h, so not even libbpf.a would be needed to work with light skeleton. "bpftool prog load -L file.o" command is introduced for debugging of syscall/loader program generation. Just like the same command without -L it will try to load the programs from file.o into the kernel. It won't even try to pin them. "bpftool prog load -L -d file.o" command will provide additional debug messages on how syscall/loader program was generated. Also the execution of syscall/loader program will use bpf_trace_printk() for each step of loading BTF, creating maps, and loading programs. The user can do "cat /.../trace_pipe" for further debug. An example of fexit_sleep.lskel.h generated from progs/fexit_sleep.c: struct fexit_sleep { struct bpf_loader_ctx ctx; struct { struct bpf_map_desc bss; } maps; struct { struct bpf_prog_desc nanosleep_fentry; struct bpf_prog_desc nanosleep_fexit; } progs; struct { int nanosleep_fentry_fd; int nanosleep_fexit_fd; } links; struct fexit_sleep__bss { int pid; int fentry_cnt; int fexit_cnt; } *bss; }; Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210514003623.28033-18-alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com
2021-05-13 17:36:19 -07:00
case 'L':
use_loader = true;
break;
default:
p_err("unrecognized option '%s'", argv[optind - 1]);
if (json_output)
clean_and_exit(-1);
else
usage();
}
}
argc -= optind;
argv += optind;
if (argc < 0)
usage();
bpftool: Add current libbpf_strict mode to version output + bpftool --legacy --version bpftool v5.15.0 features: libbfd, skeletons + bpftool --version bpftool v5.15.0 features: libbfd, libbpf_strict, skeletons + bpftool --legacy --help Usage: bpftool [OPTIONS] OBJECT { COMMAND | help } bpftool batch file FILE bpftool version OBJECT := { prog | map | link | cgroup | perf | net | feature | btf | gen | struct_ops | iter } OPTIONS := { {-j|--json} [{-p|--pretty}] | {-d|--debug} | {-l|--legacy} | {-V|--version} } + bpftool --help Usage: bpftool [OPTIONS] OBJECT { COMMAND | help } bpftool batch file FILE bpftool version OBJECT := { prog | map | link | cgroup | perf | net | feature | btf | gen | struct_ops | iter } OPTIONS := { {-j|--json} [{-p|--pretty}] | {-d|--debug} | {-l|--legacy} | {-V|--version} } + bpftool --legacy Usage: bpftool [OPTIONS] OBJECT { COMMAND | help } bpftool batch file FILE bpftool version OBJECT := { prog | map | link | cgroup | perf | net | feature | btf | gen | struct_ops | iter } OPTIONS := { {-j|--json} [{-p|--pretty}] | {-d|--debug} | {-l|--legacy} | {-V|--version} } + bpftool Usage: bpftool [OPTIONS] OBJECT { COMMAND | help } bpftool batch file FILE bpftool version OBJECT := { prog | map | link | cgroup | perf | net | feature | btf | gen | struct_ops | iter } OPTIONS := { {-j|--json} [{-p|--pretty}] | {-d|--debug} | {-l|--legacy} | {-V|--version} } + bpftool --legacy version bpftool v5.15.0 features: libbfd, skeletons + bpftool version bpftool v5.15.0 features: libbfd, libbpf_strict, skeletons + bpftool --json --legacy version {"version":"5.15.0","features":{"libbfd":true,"libbpf_strict":false,"skeletons":true}} + bpftool --json version {"version":"5.15.0","features":{"libbfd":true,"libbpf_strict":true,"skeletons":true}} Suggested-by: Quentin Monnet <quentin@isovalent.com> Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Reviewed-by: Quentin Monnet <quentin@isovalent.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211116000448.2918854-1-sdf@google.com
2021-11-15 16:04:48 -08:00
if (version_requested)
return do_version(argc, argv);
ret = cmd_select(commands, argc, argv, do_help);
if (json_output)
jsonw_destroy(&json_wtr);
btf__free(base_btf);
tools: bpftool: show filenames of pinned objects Added support to show filenames of pinned objects. For example: root@test# ./bpftool prog 3: tracepoint name tracepoint__irq tag f677a7dd722299a3 loaded_at Oct 26/11:39 uid 0 xlated 160B not jited memlock 4096B map_ids 4 pinned /sys/fs/bpf/softirq_prog 4: tracepoint name tracepoint__irq tag ea5dc530d00b92b6 loaded_at Oct 26/11:39 uid 0 xlated 392B not jited memlock 4096B map_ids 4,6 root@test# ./bpftool --json --pretty prog [{ "id": 3, "type": "tracepoint", "name": "tracepoint__irq", "tag": "f677a7dd722299a3", "loaded_at": "Oct 26/11:39", "uid": 0, "bytes_xlated": 160, "jited": false, "bytes_memlock": 4096, "map_ids": [4 ], "pinned": ["/sys/fs/bpf/softirq_prog" ] },{ "id": 4, "type": "tracepoint", "name": "tracepoint__irq", "tag": "ea5dc530d00b92b6", "loaded_at": "Oct 26/11:39", "uid": 0, "bytes_xlated": 392, "jited": false, "bytes_memlock": 4096, "map_ids": [4,6 ], "pinned": [] } ] root@test# ./bpftool map 4: hash name start flags 0x0 key 4B value 16B max_entries 10240 memlock 1003520B pinned /sys/fs/bpf/softirq_map1 5: hash name iptr flags 0x0 key 4B value 8B max_entries 10240 memlock 921600B root@test# ./bpftool --json --pretty map [{ "id": 4, "type": "hash", "name": "start", "flags": 0, "bytes_key": 4, "bytes_value": 16, "max_entries": 10240, "bytes_memlock": 1003520, "pinned": ["/sys/fs/bpf/softirq_map1" ] },{ "id": 5, "type": "hash", "name": "iptr", "flags": 0, "bytes_key": 4, "bytes_value": 8, "max_entries": 10240, "bytes_memlock": 921600, "pinned": [] } ] Signed-off-by: Prashant Bhole <bhole_prashant_q7@lab.ntt.co.jp> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2017-11-08 13:55:48 +09:00
return ret;
}