mirror of
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git
synced 2024-12-28 16:56:26 +00:00
bpf: track changes_pkt_data property for global functions
When processing calls to certain helpers, verifier invalidates all packet pointers in a current state. For example, consider the following program: __attribute__((__noinline__)) long skb_pull_data(struct __sk_buff *sk, __u32 len) { return bpf_skb_pull_data(sk, len); } SEC("tc") int test_invalidate_checks(struct __sk_buff *sk) { int *p = (void *)(long)sk->data; if ((void *)(p + 1) > (void *)(long)sk->data_end) return TCX_DROP; skb_pull_data(sk, 0); *p = 42; return TCX_PASS; } After a call to bpf_skb_pull_data() the pointer 'p' can't be used safely. See function filter.c:bpf_helper_changes_pkt_data() for a list of such helpers. At the moment verifier invalidates packet pointers when processing helper function calls, and does not traverse global sub-programs when processing calls to global sub-programs. This means that calls to helpers done from global sub-programs do not invalidate pointers in the caller state. E.g. the program above is unsafe, but is not rejected by verifier. This commit fixes the omission by computing field bpf_subprog_info->changes_pkt_data for each sub-program before main verification pass. changes_pkt_data should be set if: - subprogram calls helper for which bpf_helper_changes_pkt_data returns true; - subprogram calls a global function, for which bpf_subprog_info->changes_pkt_data should be set. The verifier.c:check_cfg() pass is modified to compute this information. The commit relies on depth first instruction traversal done by check_cfg() and absence of recursive function calls: - check_cfg() would eventually visit every call to subprogram S in a state when S is fully explored; - when S is fully explored: - every direct helper call within S is explored (and thus changes_pkt_data is set if needed); - every call to subprogram S1 called by S was visited with S1 fully explored (and thus S inherits changes_pkt_data from S1). The downside of such approach is that dead code elimination is not taken into account: if a helper call inside global function is dead because of current configuration, verifier would conservatively assume that the call occurs for the purpose of the changes_pkt_data computation. Reported-by: Nick Zavaritsky <mejedi@gmail.com> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/0498CA22-5779-4767-9C0C-A9515CEA711F@gmail.com/ Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241210041100.1898468-4-eddyz87@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
b238e187b4
commit
51081a3f25
@ -659,6 +659,7 @@ struct bpf_subprog_info {
|
||||
bool args_cached: 1;
|
||||
/* true if bpf_fastcall stack region is used by functions that can't be inlined */
|
||||
bool keep_fastcall_stack: 1;
|
||||
bool changes_pkt_data: 1;
|
||||
|
||||
enum priv_stack_mode priv_stack_mode;
|
||||
u8 arg_cnt;
|
||||
|
@ -10042,6 +10042,8 @@ static int check_func_call(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn,
|
||||
|
||||
verbose(env, "Func#%d ('%s') is global and assumed valid.\n",
|
||||
subprog, sub_name);
|
||||
if (env->subprog_info[subprog].changes_pkt_data)
|
||||
clear_all_pkt_pointers(env);
|
||||
/* mark global subprog for verifying after main prog */
|
||||
subprog_aux(env, subprog)->called = true;
|
||||
clear_caller_saved_regs(env, caller->regs);
|
||||
@ -16246,6 +16248,29 @@ static int check_return_code(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int regno, const char
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static void mark_subprog_changes_pkt_data(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int off)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct bpf_subprog_info *subprog;
|
||||
|
||||
subprog = find_containing_subprog(env, off);
|
||||
subprog->changes_pkt_data = true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* 't' is an index of a call-site.
|
||||
* 'w' is a callee entry point.
|
||||
* Eventually this function would be called when env->cfg.insn_state[w] == EXPLORED.
|
||||
* Rely on DFS traversal order and absence of recursive calls to guarantee that
|
||||
* callee's change_pkt_data marks would be correct at that moment.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
static void merge_callee_effects(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int t, int w)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct bpf_subprog_info *caller, *callee;
|
||||
|
||||
caller = find_containing_subprog(env, t);
|
||||
callee = find_containing_subprog(env, w);
|
||||
caller->changes_pkt_data |= callee->changes_pkt_data;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* non-recursive DFS pseudo code
|
||||
* 1 procedure DFS-iterative(G,v):
|
||||
* 2 label v as discovered
|
||||
@ -16379,6 +16404,7 @@ static int visit_func_call_insn(int t, struct bpf_insn *insns,
|
||||
bool visit_callee)
|
||||
{
|
||||
int ret, insn_sz;
|
||||
int w;
|
||||
|
||||
insn_sz = bpf_is_ldimm64(&insns[t]) ? 2 : 1;
|
||||
ret = push_insn(t, t + insn_sz, FALLTHROUGH, env);
|
||||
@ -16390,8 +16416,10 @@ static int visit_func_call_insn(int t, struct bpf_insn *insns,
|
||||
mark_jmp_point(env, t + insn_sz);
|
||||
|
||||
if (visit_callee) {
|
||||
w = t + insns[t].imm + 1;
|
||||
mark_prune_point(env, t);
|
||||
ret = push_insn(t, t + insns[t].imm + 1, BRANCH, env);
|
||||
merge_callee_effects(env, t, w);
|
||||
ret = push_insn(t, w, BRANCH, env);
|
||||
}
|
||||
return ret;
|
||||
}
|
||||
@ -16708,6 +16736,8 @@ static int visit_insn(int t, struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
|
||||
mark_prune_point(env, t);
|
||||
mark_jmp_point(env, t);
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (bpf_helper_call(insn) && bpf_helper_changes_pkt_data(insn->imm))
|
||||
mark_subprog_changes_pkt_data(env, t);
|
||||
if (insn->src_reg == BPF_PSEUDO_KFUNC_CALL) {
|
||||
struct bpf_kfunc_call_arg_meta meta;
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user