Kernel/linux-stable
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git synced 2024-12-29 09:16:33 +00:00
Code Issues Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

mm/damon/core: handle zero schemes apply interval

Browse Source 
DAMON's logics to determine if this is the time to apply damos schemes
assumes next_apply_sis is always set larger than current
passed_sample_intervals.  And therefore assume continuously incrementing
passed_sample_intervals will make it reaches to the next_apply_sis in
future.  The logic hence does apply the scheme and update next_apply_sis
only if passed_sample_intervals is same to next_apply_sis.

If Schemes apply interval is set as zero, however, next_apply_sis is set
same to current passed_sample_intervals, respectively.  And
passed_sample_intervals is incremented before doing the next_apply_sis
check.  Hence, next_apply_sis becomes larger than next_apply_sis, and the
logic says it is not the time to apply schemes and update next_apply_sis. 
In other words, DAMON stops applying schemes until passed_sample_intervals
overflows.

Based on the documents and the common sense, a reasonable behavior for
such inputs would be applying the schemes for every sampling interval. 
Handle the case by removing the assumption.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241031183757.49610-3-sj@kernel.org
Fixes: 42f994b714 ("mm/damon/core: implement scheme-specific apply interval")
Signed-off-by: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>	[6.7.x]
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
SeongJae Park 2024-10-31 11:37:57 -07:00 committed by Andrew Morton
parent 3488af0970
commit 8e7bde615f
1 changed files with 4 additions and 4 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

8
mm/damon/core.c
View File

@ -1412,7 +1412,7 @@ static void damon_do_apply_schemes(struct damon_ctx *c,
damon_for_each_scheme(s, c) {
struct damos_quota *quota = &s->quota;
if (c->passed_sample_intervals != s->next_apply_sis)
if (c->passed_sample_intervals < s->next_apply_sis)
continue;
if (!s->wmarks.activated)
@ -1622,7 +1622,7 @@ static void kdamond_apply_schemes(struct damon_ctx *c)
bool has_schemes_to_apply = false;
damon_for_each_scheme(s, c) {
if (c->passed_sample_intervals != s->next_apply_sis)
if (c->passed_sample_intervals < s->next_apply_sis)
continue;
if (!s->wmarks.activated)
@ -1642,9 +1642,9 @@ static void kdamond_apply_schemes(struct damon_ctx *c)
}
damon_for_each_scheme(s, c) {
if (c->passed_sample_intervals != s->next_apply_sis)
if (c->passed_sample_intervals < s->next_apply_sis)
continue;
s->next_apply_sis +=
s->next_apply_sis = c->passed_sample_intervals +
(s->apply_interval_us ? s->apply_interval_us :
c->attrs.aggr_interval) / sample_interval;
}