mirror of
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git
synced 2025-01-01 10:45:49 +00:00
mm/damon/core: handle zero schemes apply interval
DAMON's logics to determine if this is the time to apply damos schemes
assumes next_apply_sis is always set larger than current
passed_sample_intervals. And therefore assume continuously incrementing
passed_sample_intervals will make it reaches to the next_apply_sis in
future. The logic hence does apply the scheme and update next_apply_sis
only if passed_sample_intervals is same to next_apply_sis.
If Schemes apply interval is set as zero, however, next_apply_sis is set
same to current passed_sample_intervals, respectively. And
passed_sample_intervals is incremented before doing the next_apply_sis
check. Hence, next_apply_sis becomes larger than next_apply_sis, and the
logic says it is not the time to apply schemes and update next_apply_sis.
In other words, DAMON stops applying schemes until passed_sample_intervals
overflows.
Based on the documents and the common sense, a reasonable behavior for
such inputs would be applying the schemes for every sampling interval.
Handle the case by removing the assumption.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241031183757.49610-3-sj@kernel.org
Fixes: 42f994b714
("mm/damon/core: implement scheme-specific apply interval")
Signed-off-by: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> [6.7.x]
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
3488af0970
commit
8e7bde615f
@ -1412,7 +1412,7 @@ static void damon_do_apply_schemes(struct damon_ctx *c,
|
|||||||
damon_for_each_scheme(s, c) {
|
damon_for_each_scheme(s, c) {
|
||||||
struct damos_quota *quota = &s->quota;
|
struct damos_quota *quota = &s->quota;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
if (c->passed_sample_intervals != s->next_apply_sis)
|
if (c->passed_sample_intervals < s->next_apply_sis)
|
||||||
continue;
|
continue;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
if (!s->wmarks.activated)
|
if (!s->wmarks.activated)
|
||||||
@ -1622,7 +1622,7 @@ static void kdamond_apply_schemes(struct damon_ctx *c)
|
|||||||
bool has_schemes_to_apply = false;
|
bool has_schemes_to_apply = false;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
damon_for_each_scheme(s, c) {
|
damon_for_each_scheme(s, c) {
|
||||||
if (c->passed_sample_intervals != s->next_apply_sis)
|
if (c->passed_sample_intervals < s->next_apply_sis)
|
||||||
continue;
|
continue;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
if (!s->wmarks.activated)
|
if (!s->wmarks.activated)
|
||||||
@ -1642,9 +1642,9 @@ static void kdamond_apply_schemes(struct damon_ctx *c)
|
|||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
damon_for_each_scheme(s, c) {
|
damon_for_each_scheme(s, c) {
|
||||||
if (c->passed_sample_intervals != s->next_apply_sis)
|
if (c->passed_sample_intervals < s->next_apply_sis)
|
||||||
continue;
|
continue;
|
||||||
s->next_apply_sis +=
|
s->next_apply_sis = c->passed_sample_intervals +
|
||||||
(s->apply_interval_us ? s->apply_interval_us :
|
(s->apply_interval_us ? s->apply_interval_us :
|
||||||
c->attrs.aggr_interval) / sample_interval;
|
c->attrs.aggr_interval) / sample_interval;
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user