Kernel/linux-stable
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git synced 2024-12-28 16:56:26 +00:00
Code Issues Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

mm: warn about illegal __GFP_NOFAIL usage in a more appropriate location and manner

Browse Source 
Three points for this change:

1. We should consolidate all warnings in one place. Currently, the
   order > 1 warning is in the hotpath, while others are in less
   likely scenarios. Moving all warnings to the slowpath will reduce
   the overhead for order > 1 and increase the visibility of other
   warnings.

2. We currently have two warnings for order: one for order > 1 in
   the hotpath and another for order > costly_order in the laziest
   path. I suggest standardizing on order > 1 since it's been in
   use for a long time.

3. We don't need to check for __GFP_NOWARN in this case. __GFP_NOWARN
   is meant to suppress allocation failure reports, but here we're
   dealing with bug detection, not allocation failures. So replace
   WARN_ON_ONCE_GFP by WARN_ON_ONCE.

[v-songbaohua@oppo.com: also update the doc for __GFP_NOFAIL with order > 1]
  Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240903223935.1697-1-21cnbao@gmail.com
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240830202823.21478-4-21cnbao@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Barry Song <v-songbaohua@oppo.com>
Suggested-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Reviewed-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: "Eugenio Pérez" <eperezma@redhat.com>
Cc: Hailong.Liu <hailong.liu@oppo.com>
Cc: Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@gmail.com>
Cc: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Cc: Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>
Cc: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>
Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>
Cc: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>
Cc: Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) <urezki@gmail.com>
Cc: Xie Yongji <xieyongji@bytedance.com>
Cc: Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
Barry Song 2024-08-31 08:28:23 +12:00 committed by Andrew Morton
parent 17d7542260
commit 903edea6c5
2 changed files with 27 additions and 26 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

3
include/linux/gfp_types.h
View File

@ -253,7 +253,8 @@ enum {
* used only when there is no reasonable failure policy) but it is
* definitely preferable to use the flag rather than opencode endless
* loop around allocator.
* Using this flag for costly allocations is _highly_ discouraged.
* Allocating pages from the buddy with __GFP_NOFAIL and order > 1 is
* not supported. Please consider using kvmalloc() instead.
*/
#define __GFP_IO ((__force gfp_t)___GFP_IO)
#define __GFP_FS ((__force gfp_t)___GFP_FS)

50
mm/page_alloc.c
View File

@ -3032,12 +3032,6 @@ struct page *rmqueue(struct zone *preferred_zone,
{
struct page *page;
/*
* We most definitely don't want callers attempting to
* allocate greater than order-1 page units with __GFP_NOFAIL.
*/
WARN_ON_ONCE((gfp_flags & __GFP_NOFAIL) && (order > 1));
if (likely(pcp_allowed_order(order))) {
page = rmqueue_pcplist(preferred_zone, zone, order,
migratetype, alloc_flags);
@ -4175,6 +4169,7 @@ __alloc_pages_slowpath(gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order,
{
bool can_direct_reclaim = gfp_mask & __GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM;
bool can_compact = gfp_compaction_allowed(gfp_mask);
bool nofail = gfp_mask & __GFP_NOFAIL;
const bool costly_order = order > PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER;
struct page *page = NULL;
unsigned int alloc_flags;
@ -4187,6 +4182,25 @@ __alloc_pages_slowpath(gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order,
unsigned int zonelist_iter_cookie;
int reserve_flags;
if (unlikely(nofail)) {
/*
* We most definitely don't want callers attempting to
* allocate greater than order-1 page units with __GFP_NOFAIL.
*/
WARN_ON_ONCE(order > 1);
/*
* Also we don't support __GFP_NOFAIL without __GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM,
* otherwise, we may result in lockup.
*/
WARN_ON_ONCE(!can_direct_reclaim);
/*
* PF_MEMALLOC request from this context is rather bizarre
* because we cannot reclaim anything and only can loop waiting
* for somebody to do a work for us.
*/
WARN_ON_ONCE(current->flags & PF_MEMALLOC);
}
restart:
compaction_retries = 0;
no_progress_loops = 0;
@ -4404,29 +4418,15 @@ __alloc_pages_slowpath(gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order,
* Make sure that __GFP_NOFAIL request doesn't leak out and make sure
* we always retry
*/
if (gfp_mask & __GFP_NOFAIL) {
if (unlikely(nofail)) {
/*
* All existing users of the __GFP_NOFAIL are blockable, so warn
* of any new users that actually require GFP_NOWAIT
* Lacking direct_reclaim we can't do anything to reclaim memory,
* we disregard these unreasonable nofail requests and still
* return NULL
*/
if (WARN_ON_ONCE_GFP(!can_direct_reclaim, gfp_mask))
if (!can_direct_reclaim)
goto fail;
/*
* PF_MEMALLOC request from this context is rather bizarre
* because we cannot reclaim anything and only can loop waiting
* for somebody to do a work for us
*/
WARN_ON_ONCE_GFP(current->flags & PF_MEMALLOC, gfp_mask);
/*
* non failing costly orders are a hard requirement which we
* are not prepared for much so let's warn about these users
* so that we can identify them and convert them to something
* else.
*/
WARN_ON_ONCE_GFP(costly_order, gfp_mask);
/*
* Help non-failing allocations by giving some access to memory
* reserves normally used for high priority non-blocking