mirror of
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git
synced 2025-01-19 12:00:00 +00:00
stacktrace: Don't skip first entry on noncurrent tasks
When doing cat /proc/<PID>/stack, the output is missing the first entry. When the current code walks the stack starting in stack_trace_save_tsk, it skips all scheduler functions (that's OK) plus one more function. But this one function should be skipped only for the 'current' task as it is stack_trace_save_tsk proper. The original code (before the common infrastructure) skipped one function only for the 'current' task -- see save_stack_trace_tsk before 3599fe12a125. So do so also in the new infrastructure now. Fixes: 214d8ca6ee85 ("stacktrace: Provide common infrastructure") Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Tested-by: Michal Suchanek <msuchanek@suse.de> Acked-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20191030072545.19462-1-jslaby@suse.cz
This commit is contained in:
parent
a99d8080aa
commit
b0c51f1584
@ -141,7 +141,8 @@ unsigned int stack_trace_save_tsk(struct task_struct *tsk, unsigned long *store,
|
|||||||
struct stacktrace_cookie c = {
|
struct stacktrace_cookie c = {
|
||||||
.store = store,
|
.store = store,
|
||||||
.size = size,
|
.size = size,
|
||||||
.skip = skipnr + 1,
|
/* skip this function if they are tracing us */
|
||||||
|
.skip = skipnr + !!(current == tsk),
|
||||||
};
|
};
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
if (!try_get_task_stack(tsk))
|
if (!try_get_task_stack(tsk))
|
||||||
@ -298,7 +299,8 @@ unsigned int stack_trace_save_tsk(struct task_struct *task,
|
|||||||
struct stack_trace trace = {
|
struct stack_trace trace = {
|
||||||
.entries = store,
|
.entries = store,
|
||||||
.max_entries = size,
|
.max_entries = size,
|
||||||
.skip = skipnr + 1,
|
/* skip this function if they are tracing us */
|
||||||
|
.skip = skipnr + !!(current == task),
|
||||||
};
|
};
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
save_stack_trace_tsk(task, &trace);
|
save_stack_trace_tsk(task, &trace);
|
||||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user