mirror of
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git
synced 2024-12-28 16:56:26 +00:00
afs: Fix possible infinite loop with unresponsive servers
A return code of 0 from afs_wait_for_one_fs_probe is an indication
that the endpoint state attached to the operation is stale and has
been superseded. In that case the iteration needs to be restarted
so that the newer probe result state gets used.
Failure to do so can result in an tight infinite loop around the
iterate_address label, where all addresses are thought to be responsive
and have been tried, with nothing to refresh the endpoint state.
Fixes: 495f2ae9e3
("afs: Fix fileserver rotation")
Reported-by: Markus Suvanto <markus.suvanto@gmail.com>
Link: https://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-afs/2024-July/008628.html
cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com>
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240906134019.131553-1-marc.dionne@auristor.com/
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240923150756.902363-6-dhowells@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
8a46067783
commit
f94d54208f
@ -506,10 +506,10 @@ int afs_wait_for_one_fs_probe(struct afs_server *server, struct afs_endpoint_sta
|
||||
finish_wait(&server->probe_wq, &wait);
|
||||
|
||||
dont_wait:
|
||||
if (estate->responsive_set & ~exclude)
|
||||
return 1;
|
||||
if (test_bit(AFS_ESTATE_SUPERSEDED, &estate->flags))
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
if (estate->responsive_set & ~exclude)
|
||||
return 1;
|
||||
if (is_intr && signal_pending(current))
|
||||
return -ERESTARTSYS;
|
||||
if (timo == 0)
|
||||
|
@ -632,8 +632,10 @@ bool afs_select_fileserver(struct afs_operation *op)
|
||||
wait_for_more_probe_results:
|
||||
error = afs_wait_for_one_fs_probe(op->server, op->estate, op->addr_tried,
|
||||
!(op->flags & AFS_OPERATION_UNINTR));
|
||||
if (!error)
|
||||
if (error == 1)
|
||||
goto iterate_address;
|
||||
if (!error)
|
||||
goto restart_from_beginning;
|
||||
|
||||
/* We've now had a failure to respond on all of a server's addresses -
|
||||
* immediately probe them again and consider retrying the server.
|
||||
@ -644,10 +646,13 @@ bool afs_select_fileserver(struct afs_operation *op)
|
||||
error = afs_wait_for_one_fs_probe(op->server, op->estate, op->addr_tried,
|
||||
!(op->flags & AFS_OPERATION_UNINTR));
|
||||
switch (error) {
|
||||
case 0:
|
||||
case 1:
|
||||
op->flags &= ~AFS_OPERATION_RETRY_SERVER;
|
||||
trace_afs_rotate(op, afs_rotate_trace_retry_server, 0);
|
||||
trace_afs_rotate(op, afs_rotate_trace_retry_server, 1);
|
||||
goto retry_server;
|
||||
case 0:
|
||||
trace_afs_rotate(op, afs_rotate_trace_retry_server, 0);
|
||||
goto restart_from_beginning;
|
||||
case -ERESTARTSYS:
|
||||
afs_op_set_error(op, error);
|
||||
goto failed;
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user