This is done as simple code transformation, the semantics of the
IRQ API provided by the core are are still very different to those
of genirq (mainly with regard to masking).
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
Rather than open coding individual IRQs in each function which
manipulates them store data for IRQs in a table which is then
referenced in the users.
This is a substantial code shrink and should be a performance win in
cases where only a single IRQ goes off at once since instead of
reading four of the second level IRQ registers for each interrupt
we read only the sub-registers which have had an interrupt flagged.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
In preparation for refactoring - it's over 700 lines of well-isolated
code and having it in a file by itself makes things more managable.
While we're at it make sure that we clean up the IRQ if we fail after
acquiring it on init.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
