After commit 0edb555a65 ("platform: Make platform_driver::remove()
return void") .remove() is (again) the right callback to implement for
platform drivers.
Convert all platform drivers below drivers/firmware to use .remove(),
with the eventual goal to drop struct platform_driver::remove_new(). As
.remove() and .remove_new() have the same prototypes, conversion is done
by just changing the structure member name in the driver initializer.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@baylibre.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/36974feb6035201d53384557259ec72fe311053b.1731397962.git.u.kleine-koenig@baylibre.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
There is an error path that checks whether the return value is
-EPROBE_DEFER to decide whether to print the error message: that
is exactly open-coding dev_err_probe(), so, switch to that.
Signed-off-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
Acked-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@baylibre.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240919120208.152987-1-angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
returning an error code. However the value returned is ignored (apart
from emitting a warning) and this typically results in resource leaks.
To improve here there is a quest to make the remove callback return
void. In the first step of this quest all drivers are converted to
.remove_new(), which already returns void. Eventually after all drivers
are converted, .remove_new() will be renamed to .remove().
Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
callback to the void returning variant.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/e2ea8abb4c30190392a86cf05cecd722d0f0b493.1703693980.git.u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
The DT of_device.h and of_platform.h date back to the separate
of_platform_bus_type before it as merged into the regular platform bus.
As part of that merge prepping Arm DT support 13 years ago, they
"temporarily" include each other. They also include platform_device.h
and of.h. As a result, there's a pretty much random mix of those include
files used throughout the tree. In order to detangle these headers and
replace the implicit includes with struct declarations, users need to
explicitly include the correct includes.
Acked-by: Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230803-dt-header-cleanups-for-soc-v2-17-d8de2cc88bff@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Some of mediatek processors contain
the Tensilica HiFix DSP for audio processing.
The communication between Host CPU and DSP firmware is
taking place using a shared memory area for message passing.
ADSP IPC protocol offers (send/recv) interfaces using
mediatek-mailbox APIs.
We use two mbox channels to implement a request-reply protocol.
Signed-off-by: Allen-KH Cheng <allen-kh.cheng@mediatek.com>
Signed-off-by: TingHan Shen <tinghan.shen@mediatek.com>
Reviewed-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Curtis Malainey <cujomalainey@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Tzung-Bi Shih <tzungbi@google.com>
Reviewed-by: YC Hung <yc.hung@mediatek.com>
Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220512082215.3018-2-tinghan.shen@mediatek.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
