mirror of
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git
synced 2024-12-28 16:56:26 +00:00
894d1b3db4
In preparation to nest mutex::wait_lock under rq::lock we need to remove wakeups from under it. Do this by utilizing wake_qs to defer the wakeup until after the lock is dropped. [Heavily changed after55f036ca7e
("locking: WW mutex cleanup") and08295b3b5b
("locking: Implement an algorithm choice for Wound-Wait mutexes")] [jstultz: rebased to mainline, added extra wake_up_q & init to avoid hangs, similar to Connor's rework of this patch] Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: John Stultz <jstultz@google.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: Metin Kaya <metin.kaya@arm.com> Acked-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net> Tested-by: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com> Tested-by: Metin Kaya <metin.kaya@arm.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241009235352.1614323-2-jstultz@google.com
304 lines
8.2 KiB
C
304 lines
8.2 KiB
C
// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* RT-specific reader/writer semaphores and reader/writer locks
|
|
*
|
|
* down_write/write_lock()
|
|
* 1) Lock rtmutex
|
|
* 2) Remove the reader BIAS to force readers into the slow path
|
|
* 3) Wait until all readers have left the critical section
|
|
* 4) Mark it write locked
|
|
*
|
|
* up_write/write_unlock()
|
|
* 1) Remove the write locked marker
|
|
* 2) Set the reader BIAS, so readers can use the fast path again
|
|
* 3) Unlock rtmutex, to release blocked readers
|
|
*
|
|
* down_read/read_lock()
|
|
* 1) Try fast path acquisition (reader BIAS is set)
|
|
* 2) Take tmutex::wait_lock, which protects the writelocked flag
|
|
* 3) If !writelocked, acquire it for read
|
|
* 4) If writelocked, block on tmutex
|
|
* 5) unlock rtmutex, goto 1)
|
|
*
|
|
* up_read/read_unlock()
|
|
* 1) Try fast path release (reader count != 1)
|
|
* 2) Wake the writer waiting in down_write()/write_lock() #3
|
|
*
|
|
* down_read/read_lock()#3 has the consequence, that rw semaphores and rw
|
|
* locks on RT are not writer fair, but writers, which should be avoided in
|
|
* RT tasks (think mmap_sem), are subject to the rtmutex priority/DL
|
|
* inheritance mechanism.
|
|
*
|
|
* It's possible to make the rw primitives writer fair by keeping a list of
|
|
* active readers. A blocked writer would force all newly incoming readers
|
|
* to block on the rtmutex, but the rtmutex would have to be proxy locked
|
|
* for one reader after the other. We can't use multi-reader inheritance
|
|
* because there is no way to support that with SCHED_DEADLINE.
|
|
* Implementing the one by one reader boosting/handover mechanism is a
|
|
* major surgery for a very dubious value.
|
|
*
|
|
* The risk of writer starvation is there, but the pathological use cases
|
|
* which trigger it are not necessarily the typical RT workloads.
|
|
*
|
|
* Fast-path orderings:
|
|
* The lock/unlock of readers can run in fast paths: lock and unlock are only
|
|
* atomic ops, and there is no inner lock to provide ACQUIRE and RELEASE
|
|
* semantics of rwbase_rt. Atomic ops should thus provide _acquire()
|
|
* and _release() (or stronger).
|
|
*
|
|
* Common code shared between RT rw_semaphore and rwlock
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
static __always_inline int rwbase_read_trylock(struct rwbase_rt *rwb)
|
|
{
|
|
int r;
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* Increment reader count, if sem->readers < 0, i.e. READER_BIAS is
|
|
* set.
|
|
*/
|
|
for (r = atomic_read(&rwb->readers); r < 0;) {
|
|
if (likely(atomic_try_cmpxchg_acquire(&rwb->readers, &r, r + 1)))
|
|
return 1;
|
|
}
|
|
return 0;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
static int __sched __rwbase_read_lock(struct rwbase_rt *rwb,
|
|
unsigned int state)
|
|
{
|
|
struct rt_mutex_base *rtm = &rwb->rtmutex;
|
|
DEFINE_WAKE_Q(wake_q);
|
|
int ret;
|
|
|
|
rwbase_pre_schedule();
|
|
raw_spin_lock_irq(&rtm->wait_lock);
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* Call into the slow lock path with the rtmutex->wait_lock
|
|
* held, so this can't result in the following race:
|
|
*
|
|
* Reader1 Reader2 Writer
|
|
* down_read()
|
|
* down_write()
|
|
* rtmutex_lock(m)
|
|
* wait()
|
|
* down_read()
|
|
* unlock(m->wait_lock)
|
|
* up_read()
|
|
* wake(Writer)
|
|
* lock(m->wait_lock)
|
|
* sem->writelocked=true
|
|
* unlock(m->wait_lock)
|
|
*
|
|
* up_write()
|
|
* sem->writelocked=false
|
|
* rtmutex_unlock(m)
|
|
* down_read()
|
|
* down_write()
|
|
* rtmutex_lock(m)
|
|
* wait()
|
|
* rtmutex_lock(m)
|
|
*
|
|
* That would put Reader1 behind the writer waiting on
|
|
* Reader2 to call up_read(), which might be unbound.
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
trace_contention_begin(rwb, LCB_F_RT | LCB_F_READ);
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* For rwlocks this returns 0 unconditionally, so the below
|
|
* !ret conditionals are optimized out.
|
|
*/
|
|
ret = rwbase_rtmutex_slowlock_locked(rtm, state, &wake_q);
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* On success the rtmutex is held, so there can't be a writer
|
|
* active. Increment the reader count and immediately drop the
|
|
* rtmutex again.
|
|
*
|
|
* rtmutex->wait_lock has to be unlocked in any case of course.
|
|
*/
|
|
if (!ret)
|
|
atomic_inc(&rwb->readers);
|
|
|
|
preempt_disable();
|
|
raw_spin_unlock_irq(&rtm->wait_lock);
|
|
wake_up_q(&wake_q);
|
|
preempt_enable();
|
|
|
|
if (!ret)
|
|
rwbase_rtmutex_unlock(rtm);
|
|
|
|
trace_contention_end(rwb, ret);
|
|
rwbase_post_schedule();
|
|
return ret;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
static __always_inline int rwbase_read_lock(struct rwbase_rt *rwb,
|
|
unsigned int state)
|
|
{
|
|
lockdep_assert(!current->pi_blocked_on);
|
|
|
|
if (rwbase_read_trylock(rwb))
|
|
return 0;
|
|
|
|
return __rwbase_read_lock(rwb, state);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
static void __sched __rwbase_read_unlock(struct rwbase_rt *rwb,
|
|
unsigned int state)
|
|
{
|
|
struct rt_mutex_base *rtm = &rwb->rtmutex;
|
|
struct task_struct *owner;
|
|
DEFINE_RT_WAKE_Q(wqh);
|
|
|
|
raw_spin_lock_irq(&rtm->wait_lock);
|
|
/*
|
|
* Wake the writer, i.e. the rtmutex owner. It might release the
|
|
* rtmutex concurrently in the fast path (due to a signal), but to
|
|
* clean up rwb->readers it needs to acquire rtm->wait_lock. The
|
|
* worst case which can happen is a spurious wakeup.
|
|
*/
|
|
owner = rt_mutex_owner(rtm);
|
|
if (owner)
|
|
rt_mutex_wake_q_add_task(&wqh, owner, state);
|
|
|
|
/* Pairs with the preempt_enable in rt_mutex_wake_up_q() */
|
|
preempt_disable();
|
|
raw_spin_unlock_irq(&rtm->wait_lock);
|
|
rt_mutex_wake_up_q(&wqh);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
static __always_inline void rwbase_read_unlock(struct rwbase_rt *rwb,
|
|
unsigned int state)
|
|
{
|
|
/*
|
|
* rwb->readers can only hit 0 when a writer is waiting for the
|
|
* active readers to leave the critical section.
|
|
*
|
|
* dec_and_test() is fully ordered, provides RELEASE.
|
|
*/
|
|
if (unlikely(atomic_dec_and_test(&rwb->readers)))
|
|
__rwbase_read_unlock(rwb, state);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
static inline void __rwbase_write_unlock(struct rwbase_rt *rwb, int bias,
|
|
unsigned long flags)
|
|
{
|
|
struct rt_mutex_base *rtm = &rwb->rtmutex;
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* _release() is needed in case that reader is in fast path, pairing
|
|
* with atomic_try_cmpxchg_acquire() in rwbase_read_trylock().
|
|
*/
|
|
(void)atomic_add_return_release(READER_BIAS - bias, &rwb->readers);
|
|
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rtm->wait_lock, flags);
|
|
rwbase_rtmutex_unlock(rtm);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
static inline void rwbase_write_unlock(struct rwbase_rt *rwb)
|
|
{
|
|
struct rt_mutex_base *rtm = &rwb->rtmutex;
|
|
unsigned long flags;
|
|
|
|
raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&rtm->wait_lock, flags);
|
|
__rwbase_write_unlock(rwb, WRITER_BIAS, flags);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
static inline void rwbase_write_downgrade(struct rwbase_rt *rwb)
|
|
{
|
|
struct rt_mutex_base *rtm = &rwb->rtmutex;
|
|
unsigned long flags;
|
|
|
|
raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&rtm->wait_lock, flags);
|
|
/* Release it and account current as reader */
|
|
__rwbase_write_unlock(rwb, WRITER_BIAS - 1, flags);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
static inline bool __rwbase_write_trylock(struct rwbase_rt *rwb)
|
|
{
|
|
/* Can do without CAS because we're serialized by wait_lock. */
|
|
lockdep_assert_held(&rwb->rtmutex.wait_lock);
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* _acquire is needed in case the reader is in the fast path, pairing
|
|
* with rwbase_read_unlock(), provides ACQUIRE.
|
|
*/
|
|
if (!atomic_read_acquire(&rwb->readers)) {
|
|
atomic_set(&rwb->readers, WRITER_BIAS);
|
|
return 1;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
static int __sched rwbase_write_lock(struct rwbase_rt *rwb,
|
|
unsigned int state)
|
|
{
|
|
struct rt_mutex_base *rtm = &rwb->rtmutex;
|
|
unsigned long flags;
|
|
|
|
/* Take the rtmutex as a first step */
|
|
if (rwbase_rtmutex_lock_state(rtm, state))
|
|
return -EINTR;
|
|
|
|
/* Force readers into slow path */
|
|
atomic_sub(READER_BIAS, &rwb->readers);
|
|
|
|
rwbase_pre_schedule();
|
|
|
|
raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&rtm->wait_lock, flags);
|
|
if (__rwbase_write_trylock(rwb))
|
|
goto out_unlock;
|
|
|
|
rwbase_set_and_save_current_state(state);
|
|
trace_contention_begin(rwb, LCB_F_RT | LCB_F_WRITE);
|
|
for (;;) {
|
|
/* Optimized out for rwlocks */
|
|
if (rwbase_signal_pending_state(state, current)) {
|
|
rwbase_restore_current_state();
|
|
__rwbase_write_unlock(rwb, 0, flags);
|
|
rwbase_post_schedule();
|
|
trace_contention_end(rwb, -EINTR);
|
|
return -EINTR;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (__rwbase_write_trylock(rwb))
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rtm->wait_lock, flags);
|
|
rwbase_schedule();
|
|
raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&rtm->wait_lock, flags);
|
|
|
|
set_current_state(state);
|
|
}
|
|
rwbase_restore_current_state();
|
|
trace_contention_end(rwb, 0);
|
|
|
|
out_unlock:
|
|
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rtm->wait_lock, flags);
|
|
rwbase_post_schedule();
|
|
return 0;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
static inline int rwbase_write_trylock(struct rwbase_rt *rwb)
|
|
{
|
|
struct rt_mutex_base *rtm = &rwb->rtmutex;
|
|
unsigned long flags;
|
|
|
|
if (!rwbase_rtmutex_trylock(rtm))
|
|
return 0;
|
|
|
|
atomic_sub(READER_BIAS, &rwb->readers);
|
|
|
|
raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&rtm->wait_lock, flags);
|
|
if (__rwbase_write_trylock(rwb)) {
|
|
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rtm->wait_lock, flags);
|
|
return 1;
|
|
}
|
|
__rwbase_write_unlock(rwb, 0, flags);
|
|
return 0;
|
|
}
|