Al Viro 9e1f1de02c more conservative S_NOSEC handling
Caching "we have already removed suid/caps" was overenthusiastic as merged.
On network filesystems we might have had suid/caps set on another client,
silently picked by this client on revalidate, all of that *without* clearing
the S_NOSEC flag.

AFAICS, the only reasonably sane way to deal with that is
	* new superblock flag; unless set, S_NOSEC is not going to be set.
	* local block filesystems set it in their ->mount() (more accurately,
mount_bdev() does, so does btrfs ->mount(), users of mount_bdev() other than
local block ones clear it)
	* if any network filesystem (or a cluster one) wants to use S_NOSEC,
it'll need to set MS_NOSEC in sb->s_flags *AND* take care to clear S_NOSEC when
inode attribute changes are picked from other clients.

It's not an earth-shattering hole (anybody that can set suid on another client
will almost certainly be able to write to the file before doing that anyway),
but it's a bug that needs fixing.

Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2011-06-03 18:24:58 -04:00
..
2011-05-23 23:37:20 -07:00
2011-03-31 11:26:23 -03:00
2010-09-08 14:25:53 +08:00
2010-09-10 09:18:15 -07:00
2009-04-03 11:39:16 -07:00
2011-03-31 11:26:23 -03:00
2010-09-10 09:18:15 -07:00
2011-03-31 11:26:23 -03:00
2011-03-07 16:43:21 +08:00
2011-02-21 11:18:23 +08:00
2008-10-13 13:57:57 -07:00
2011-02-22 21:59:46 +08:00
2011-03-31 11:26:23 -03:00
2008-02-03 17:33:42 +02:00
2011-05-23 23:37:20 -07:00
2011-03-31 11:26:23 -03:00
2011-03-31 11:26:23 -03:00
2011-03-31 11:26:23 -03:00
2011-03-31 11:26:23 -03:00
2011-06-03 18:24:58 -04:00
2011-03-07 16:43:21 +08:00
2011-02-24 16:22:20 +08:00
2008-01-25 15:05:46 -08:00
2011-03-31 11:26:23 -03:00