... and produce consistent error on attempt to delete such.
Existing check in u32_delete() is inconsistent - after
tc qdisc add dev eth0 ingress
tc filter add dev eth0 parent ffff: protocol ip prio 100 handle 1: u32 \
divisor 1
tc filter add dev eth0 parent ffff: protocol ip prio 200 handle 2: u32 \
divisor 1
both
tc filter delete dev eth0 parent ffff: protocol ip prio 100 handle 801: u32
and
tc filter delete dev eth0 parent ffff: protocol ip prio 100 handle 800: u32
will fail (at least with refcounting fixes), but the former will complain
about an attempt to remove a busy table, while the latter will recognize
it as root and yield "Not allowed to delete root node" instead.
The problem with the existing check is that several tcf_proto instances
might share the same tp->data and handle-to-hnode lookup will be the same
for all of them. So comparing an hnode to be deleted with tp->root won't
catch the case when one tp is used to try deleting the root of another.
Solution is trivial - mark the root hnodes explicitly upon allocation and
check for that.
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
b44ef84542