mirror of
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git
synced 2025-01-09 23:00:21 +00:00
KVM: nVMX: add missing consistency checks for CR0 and CR4
The effective values of the guest CR0 and CR4 registers may differ from those included in the VMCS12. In particular, disabling EPT forces CR4.PAE=1 and disabling unrestricted guest mode forces CR0.PG=CR0.PE=1. Therefore, checks on these bits cannot be delegated to the processor and must be performed by KVM. Reported-by: Reima ISHII <ishiir@g.ecc.u-tokyo.ac.jp> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
bceeedb2f0
commit
112e66017b
@ -3022,7 +3022,7 @@ static int nested_vmx_check_guest_state(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
|
||||
struct vmcs12 *vmcs12,
|
||||
enum vm_entry_failure_code *entry_failure_code)
|
||||
{
|
||||
bool ia32e;
|
||||
bool ia32e = !!(vmcs12->vm_entry_controls & VM_ENTRY_IA32E_MODE);
|
||||
|
||||
*entry_failure_code = ENTRY_FAIL_DEFAULT;
|
||||
|
||||
@ -3048,6 +3048,13 @@ static int nested_vmx_check_guest_state(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
|
||||
vmcs12->guest_ia32_perf_global_ctrl)))
|
||||
return -EINVAL;
|
||||
|
||||
if (CC((vmcs12->guest_cr0 & (X86_CR0_PG | X86_CR0_PE)) == X86_CR0_PG))
|
||||
return -EINVAL;
|
||||
|
||||
if (CC(ia32e && !(vmcs12->guest_cr4 & X86_CR4_PAE)) ||
|
||||
CC(ia32e && !(vmcs12->guest_cr0 & X86_CR0_PG)))
|
||||
return -EINVAL;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* If the load IA32_EFER VM-entry control is 1, the following checks
|
||||
* are performed on the field for the IA32_EFER MSR:
|
||||
@ -3059,7 +3066,6 @@ static int nested_vmx_check_guest_state(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (to_vmx(vcpu)->nested.nested_run_pending &&
|
||||
(vmcs12->vm_entry_controls & VM_ENTRY_LOAD_IA32_EFER)) {
|
||||
ia32e = (vmcs12->vm_entry_controls & VM_ENTRY_IA32E_MODE) != 0;
|
||||
if (CC(!kvm_valid_efer(vcpu, vmcs12->guest_ia32_efer)) ||
|
||||
CC(ia32e != !!(vmcs12->guest_ia32_efer & EFER_LMA)) ||
|
||||
CC(((vmcs12->guest_cr0 & X86_CR0_PG) &&
|
||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user