From aca0ec970d7644954caf01a40c5538d4400c01bd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Ackerley Tng Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2024 17:39:55 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] KVM: x86/mmu: fix determination of max NPT mapping level for private pages The `if (req_max_level)` test was meant ignore req_max_level if PG_LEVEL_NONE was returned. Hence, this function should return max_level instead of the ignored req_max_level. This is only a latent issue for now, since guest_memfd does not support large pages. Signed-off-by: Ackerley Tng Message-ID: <20240801173955.1975034-1-ackerleytng@google.com> Fixes: f32fb32820b1 ("KVM: x86: Add hook for determining max NPT mapping level") Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini --- arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c index 43a02891babb..928cf84778b0 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c @@ -4335,7 +4335,7 @@ static u8 kvm_max_private_mapping_level(struct kvm *kvm, kvm_pfn_t pfn, if (req_max_level) max_level = min(max_level, req_max_level); - return req_max_level; + return max_level; } static int kvm_faultin_pfn_private(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,