Al Viro 4e3911f3d7 ufs: the offsets ufs_block_to_path() puts into array are not sector_t
type makes no sense - those are indices in block number arrays, not
block numbers.  And no, UFS is not likely to grow indirect blocks with
4Gpointers in them...

Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2015-07-06 17:39:31 -04:00
..
2015-04-11 22:29:40 -04:00
2015-06-16 02:07:38 -04:00
2015-07-06 17:39:30 -04:00
2015-06-17 14:44:05 -04:00
2015-07-06 17:39:26 -04:00
2008-04-28 08:58:45 -07:00
2015-05-10 22:18:25 -04:00
2012-07-22 23:58:16 +04:00
2015-07-06 17:39:30 -04:00
2011-03-23 19:46:19 -07:00