Replace `cpumask_any_and(a, b) >= nr_cpu_ids`
with the more readable `!cpumask_intersects(a, b)`.
Comparison between cpumask_any_and() and cpumask_intersects()
The cpumask_any_and() function expands using FIND_FIRST_BIT(),
resulting in a loop that iterates through each bit of the bitmask:
for (idx = 0; idx * BITS_PER_LONG < sz; idx++) {
val = (FETCH);
if (val) {
sz = min(idx * BITS_PER_LONG + __ffs(MUNGE(val)), sz);
break;
}
}
The cpumask_intersects() function expands using __bitmap_intersects(),
resulting in that the first loop iterates through each long word of the bitmask,
and the second through each bit within a long word:
unsigned int k, lim = bits/BITS_PER_LONG;
for (k = 0; k < lim; ++k)
if (bitmap1[k] & bitmap2[k])
return true;
if (bits % BITS_PER_LONG)
if ((bitmap1[k] & bitmap2[k]) & BITMAP_LAST_WORD_MASK(bits))
return true;
Conclusion: cpumask_intersects() is at least as efficient as cpumask_any_and(),
if not more so, as it typically performs fewer loops and comparisons.
Signed-off-by: Costa Shulyupin <costa.shul@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20240926092623.399577-2-costa.shul@redhat.com