mirror of
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git
synced 2025-01-09 15:29:16 +00:00
drm/doc/rfc: Mark drm_scheduler as completed
Current drm-xe-next doesn't have any drm/scheduler patch that is not already accepted in drm-misc-next. This completed this goal with the consensus of how the drm/scheduler fits to the fw scheduling and the relationship between drm_gpu_scheduler and drm_sched_entity. Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20231201042158.80009-3-rodrigo.vivi@intel.com Acked-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
This commit is contained in:
parent
a85607e3cf
commit
0e2e6c49c1
@ -70,24 +70,6 @@ When the time comes for Xe, the protection will be lifted on Xe and kept in i915
|
||||
Xe – Pre-Merge Goals - Work-in-Progress
|
||||
=======================================
|
||||
|
||||
Drm_scheduler
|
||||
-------------
|
||||
Xe primarily uses Firmware based scheduling (GuC FW). However, it will use
|
||||
drm_scheduler as the scheduler ‘frontend’ for userspace submission in order to
|
||||
resolve syncobj and dma-buf implicit sync dependencies. However, drm_scheduler is
|
||||
not yet prepared to handle the 1-to-1 relationship between drm_gpu_scheduler and
|
||||
drm_sched_entity.
|
||||
|
||||
Deeper changes to drm_scheduler should *not* be required to get Xe accepted, but
|
||||
some consensus needs to be reached between Xe and other community drivers that
|
||||
could also benefit from this work, for coupling FW based/assisted submission such
|
||||
as the ARM’s new Mali GPU driver, and others.
|
||||
|
||||
As a key measurable result, the patch series introducing Xe itself shall not
|
||||
depend on any other patch touching drm_scheduler itself that was not yet merged
|
||||
through drm-misc. This, by itself, already includes the reach of an agreement for
|
||||
uniform 1 to 1 relationship implementation / usage across drivers.
|
||||
|
||||
ASYNC VM_BIND
|
||||
-------------
|
||||
Although having a common DRM level IOCTL for VM_BIND is not a requirement to get
|
||||
@ -169,6 +151,24 @@ Xe – uAPI high level overview
|
||||
Xe – Pre-Merge Goals - Completed
|
||||
================================
|
||||
|
||||
Drm_scheduler
|
||||
-------------
|
||||
Xe primarily uses Firmware based scheduling (GuC FW). However, it will use
|
||||
drm_scheduler as the scheduler ‘frontend’ for userspace submission in order to
|
||||
resolve syncobj and dma-buf implicit sync dependencies. However, drm_scheduler is
|
||||
not yet prepared to handle the 1-to-1 relationship between drm_gpu_scheduler and
|
||||
drm_sched_entity.
|
||||
|
||||
Deeper changes to drm_scheduler should *not* be required to get Xe accepted, but
|
||||
some consensus needs to be reached between Xe and other community drivers that
|
||||
could also benefit from this work, for coupling FW based/assisted submission such
|
||||
as the ARM’s new Mali GPU driver, and others.
|
||||
|
||||
As a key measurable result, the patch series introducing Xe itself shall not
|
||||
depend on any other patch touching drm_scheduler itself that was not yet merged
|
||||
through drm-misc. This, by itself, already includes the reach of an agreement for
|
||||
uniform 1 to 1 relationship implementation / usage across drivers.
|
||||
|
||||
Long running compute: minimal data structure/scaffolding
|
||||
--------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
The generic scheduler code needs to include the handling of endless compute
|
||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user