mirror of
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git
synced 2025-01-15 11:57:46 +00:00
kprobes: Reduce preempt disable scope in check_kprobe_access_safe()
Commit a189d0350f387 ("kprobes: disable preempt for module_text_address() and kernel_text_address()") introduced a preempt_disable() region to protect against concurrent module unloading. However this region also includes the call to jump_label_text_reserved() which takes a long time; up to 400us, iterating over approx 6000 jump tables. The scope protected by preempt_disable() is largen than necessary. core_kernel_text() does not need to be protected as it does not interact with module code at all. Only the scope from __module_text_address() to try_module_get() needs to be protected. By limiting the critical section to __module_text_address() and try_module_get() the function responsible for the latency spike remains preemptible. This works fine even when !CONFIG_MODULES as in that case try_module_get() will always return true and that block can be optimized away. Limit the critical section to __module_text_address() and try_module_get(). Use guard(preempt)() for easier error handling. While at it also remove a spurious *probed_mod = NULL in an error path. On errors the output parameter is never inspected by the caller. Some error paths were clearing the parameters, some didn't. Align them for clarity. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241121-kprobes-preempt-v1-1-fd581ee7fcbb@linutronix.de/ Signed-off-by: Thomas Weißschuh <thomas.weissschuh@linutronix.de> Reviewed-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
30c8fd31c5
commit
1703abb4de
@ -39,6 +39,7 @@
|
||||
#include <linux/static_call.h>
|
||||
#include <linux/perf_event.h>
|
||||
#include <linux/execmem.h>
|
||||
#include <linux/cleanup.h>
|
||||
|
||||
#include <asm/sections.h>
|
||||
#include <asm/cacheflush.h>
|
||||
@ -1566,16 +1567,25 @@ static int check_kprobe_address_safe(struct kprobe *p,
|
||||
if (ret)
|
||||
return ret;
|
||||
jump_label_lock();
|
||||
preempt_disable();
|
||||
|
||||
/* Ensure the address is in a text area, and find a module if exists. */
|
||||
*probed_mod = NULL;
|
||||
if (!core_kernel_text((unsigned long) p->addr)) {
|
||||
guard(preempt)();
|
||||
*probed_mod = __module_text_address((unsigned long) p->addr);
|
||||
if (!(*probed_mod)) {
|
||||
ret = -EINVAL;
|
||||
goto out;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* We must hold a refcount of the probed module while updating
|
||||
* its code to prohibit unexpected unloading.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (unlikely(!try_module_get(*probed_mod))) {
|
||||
ret = -ENOENT;
|
||||
goto out;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
/* Ensure it is not in reserved area. */
|
||||
if (in_gate_area_no_mm((unsigned long) p->addr) ||
|
||||
@ -1584,21 +1594,13 @@ static int check_kprobe_address_safe(struct kprobe *p,
|
||||
static_call_text_reserved(p->addr, p->addr) ||
|
||||
find_bug((unsigned long)p->addr) ||
|
||||
is_cfi_preamble_symbol((unsigned long)p->addr)) {
|
||||
module_put(*probed_mod);
|
||||
ret = -EINVAL;
|
||||
goto out;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* Get module refcount and reject __init functions for loaded modules. */
|
||||
if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MODULES) && *probed_mod) {
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* We must hold a refcount of the probed module while updating
|
||||
* its code to prohibit unexpected unloading.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (unlikely(!try_module_get(*probed_mod))) {
|
||||
ret = -ENOENT;
|
||||
goto out;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* If the module freed '.init.text', we couldn't insert
|
||||
* kprobes in there.
|
||||
@ -1606,13 +1608,11 @@ static int check_kprobe_address_safe(struct kprobe *p,
|
||||
if (within_module_init((unsigned long)p->addr, *probed_mod) &&
|
||||
!module_is_coming(*probed_mod)) {
|
||||
module_put(*probed_mod);
|
||||
*probed_mod = NULL;
|
||||
ret = -ENOENT;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
out:
|
||||
preempt_enable();
|
||||
jump_label_unlock();
|
||||
|
||||
return ret;
|
||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user