mirror of
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git
synced 2024-12-29 01:02:08 +00:00
initramfs: Check negative timestamp to prevent broken cpio archive
Similar to commit 4c9d410f32
("initramfs: Check timestamp to prevent
broken cpio archive"), except asserts that the timestamp is
non-negative. This can happen when the KBUILD_BUILD_TIMESTAMP is a value
before UNIX epoch, which may be set when making reproducible builds that
don't want to look like they use a valid date.
While support for dates before 1970 might not be supported, this is more
about preventing undetected CPIO corruption. The printf's use a minimum
length format specifier, and will happily make the field longer than 8
characters if they need to.
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Gray <bgray@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Donnellan <ajd@linux.ibm.com>
Tested-by: Andrew Donnellan <ajd@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
aa7d233f45
commit
5efb685bb3
@ -353,6 +353,12 @@ static int cpio_mkfile(const char *name, const char *location,
|
||||
buf.st_mtime = 0xffffffff;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (buf.st_mtime < 0) {
|
||||
fprintf(stderr, "%s: Timestamp negative, clipping.\n",
|
||||
location);
|
||||
buf.st_mtime = 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (buf.st_size > 0xffffffff) {
|
||||
fprintf(stderr, "%s: Size exceeds maximum cpio file size\n",
|
||||
location);
|
||||
@ -602,10 +608,10 @@ int main (int argc, char *argv[])
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Timestamps after 2106-02-07 06:28:15 UTC have an ascii hex time_t
|
||||
* representation that exceeds 8 chars and breaks the cpio header
|
||||
* specification.
|
||||
* specification. Negative timestamps similarly exceed 8 chars.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (default_mtime > 0xffffffff) {
|
||||
fprintf(stderr, "ERROR: Timestamp too large for cpio format\n");
|
||||
if (default_mtime > 0xffffffff || default_mtime < 0) {
|
||||
fprintf(stderr, "ERROR: Timestamp out of range for cpio format\n");
|
||||
exit(1);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user