mirror of
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git
synced 2024-12-29 09:12:07 +00:00
docs: locking: Add 'need' to hardirq section
Add the missing word to make this sentence read properly. Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200318174133.160206-2-swboyd@chromium.org Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
This commit is contained in:
parent
769f90f8a9
commit
6adb775599
@ -263,7 +263,7 @@ by a hardware interrupt on another CPU. This is where
|
||||
interrupts on that cpu, then grab the lock.
|
||||
:c:func:`spin_unlock_irq()` does the reverse.
|
||||
|
||||
The irq handler does not to use :c:func:`spin_lock_irq()`, because
|
||||
The irq handler does not need to use :c:func:`spin_lock_irq()`, because
|
||||
the softirq cannot run while the irq handler is running: it can use
|
||||
:c:func:`spin_lock()`, which is slightly faster. The only exception
|
||||
would be if a different hardware irq handler uses the same lock:
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user