From 76f99fc1566d99bc263249996240df5511c73819 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Frederic Weisbecker Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2024 00:48:55 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] soc/qman: test: Use kthread_run_on_cpu() Use the proper API instead of open coding it. However it looks like kthreads here could be replaced by the use of a per-cpu workqueue instead. Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker --- drivers/soc/fsl/qbman/qman_test_stash.c | 6 ++---- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/soc/fsl/qbman/qman_test_stash.c b/drivers/soc/fsl/qbman/qman_test_stash.c index b7e8e5ec884c..f4d3c2146f4f 100644 --- a/drivers/soc/fsl/qbman/qman_test_stash.c +++ b/drivers/soc/fsl/qbman/qman_test_stash.c @@ -108,14 +108,12 @@ static int on_all_cpus(int (*fn)(void)) .fn = fn, .started = ATOMIC_INIT(0) }; - struct task_struct *k = kthread_create(bstrap_fn, &bstrap, - "hotpotato%d", cpu); + struct task_struct *k = kthread_run_on_cpu(bstrap_fn, &bstrap, + cpu, "hotpotato%d"); int ret; if (IS_ERR(k)) return -ENOMEM; - kthread_bind(k, cpu); - wake_up_process(k); /* * If we call kthread_stop() before the "wake up" has had an * effect, then the thread may exit with -EINTR without ever