mirror of
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git
synced 2025-01-17 22:05:08 +00:00
i2c: designware: Remove 'cond' from i2c_dw_scl_hcnt()
The 'cond' parameter is not being used (always default, hence drop it and hence make it consistent with i2c_dw_scl_lcnt(). Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
dd05a76e69
commit
86bdd8e033
@ -407,47 +407,26 @@ static u32 i2c_dw_read_scl_reg(struct dw_i2c_dev *dev, u32 reg)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
u32 i2c_dw_scl_hcnt(struct dw_i2c_dev *dev, unsigned int reg, u32 ic_clk,
|
||||
u32 tSYMBOL, u32 tf, int cond, int offset)
|
||||
u32 tSYMBOL, u32 tf, int offset)
|
||||
{
|
||||
if (!ic_clk)
|
||||
return i2c_dw_read_scl_reg(dev, reg);
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* DesignWare I2C core doesn't seem to have solid strategy to meet
|
||||
* the tHD;STA timing spec. Configuring _HCNT based on tHIGH spec
|
||||
* will result in violation of the tHD;STA spec.
|
||||
* Conditional expression:
|
||||
*
|
||||
* IC_[FS]S_SCL_HCNT + 3 >= IC_CLK * (tHD;STA + tf)
|
||||
*
|
||||
* This is just experimental rule; the tHD;STA period turned
|
||||
* out to be proportinal to (_HCNT + 3). With this setting,
|
||||
* we could meet both tHIGH and tHD;STA timing specs.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* If unsure, you'd better to take this alternative.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* The reason why we need to take into account "tf" here,
|
||||
* is the same as described in i2c_dw_scl_lcnt().
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (cond)
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Conditional expression:
|
||||
*
|
||||
* IC_[FS]S_SCL_HCNT + (1+4+3) >= IC_CLK * tHIGH
|
||||
*
|
||||
* This is based on the DW manuals, and represents an ideal
|
||||
* configuration. The resulting I2C bus speed will be
|
||||
* faster than any of the others.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* If your hardware is free from tHD;STA issue, try this one.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
return DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST_ULL((u64)ic_clk * tSYMBOL, MICRO) -
|
||||
8 + offset;
|
||||
else
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Conditional expression:
|
||||
*
|
||||
* IC_[FS]S_SCL_HCNT + 3 >= IC_CLK * (tHD;STA + tf)
|
||||
*
|
||||
* This is just experimental rule; the tHD;STA period turned
|
||||
* out to be proportinal to (_HCNT + 3). With this setting,
|
||||
* we could meet both tHIGH and tHD;STA timing specs.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* If unsure, you'd better to take this alternative.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* The reason why we need to take into account "tf" here,
|
||||
* is the same as described in i2c_dw_scl_lcnt().
|
||||
*/
|
||||
return DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST_ULL((u64)ic_clk * (tSYMBOL + tf), MICRO) -
|
||||
3 + offset;
|
||||
return DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST_ULL((u64)ic_clk * (tSYMBOL + tf), MICRO) - 3 + offset;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
u32 i2c_dw_scl_lcnt(struct dw_i2c_dev *dev, unsigned int reg, u32 ic_clk,
|
||||
@ -467,8 +446,7 @@ u32 i2c_dw_scl_lcnt(struct dw_i2c_dev *dev, unsigned int reg, u32 ic_clk,
|
||||
* account the fall time of SCL signal (tf). Default tf value
|
||||
* should be 0.3 us, for safety.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
return DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST_ULL((u64)ic_clk * (tLOW + tf), MICRO) -
|
||||
1 + offset;
|
||||
return DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST_ULL((u64)ic_clk * (tLOW + tf), MICRO) - 1 + offset;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
int i2c_dw_set_sda_hold(struct dw_i2c_dev *dev)
|
||||
|
@ -329,7 +329,7 @@ struct i2c_dw_semaphore_callbacks {
|
||||
|
||||
int i2c_dw_init_regmap(struct dw_i2c_dev *dev);
|
||||
u32 i2c_dw_scl_hcnt(struct dw_i2c_dev *dev, unsigned int reg, u32 ic_clk,
|
||||
u32 tSYMBOL, u32 tf, int cond, int offset);
|
||||
u32 tSYMBOL, u32 tf, int offset);
|
||||
u32 i2c_dw_scl_lcnt(struct dw_i2c_dev *dev, unsigned int reg, u32 ic_clk,
|
||||
u32 tLOW, u32 tf, int offset);
|
||||
int i2c_dw_set_sda_hold(struct dw_i2c_dev *dev);
|
||||
|
@ -71,7 +71,6 @@ static int i2c_dw_set_timings_master(struct dw_i2c_dev *dev)
|
||||
ic_clk,
|
||||
4000, /* tHD;STA = tHIGH = 4.0 us */
|
||||
sda_falling_time,
|
||||
0, /* 0: DW default, 1: Ideal */
|
||||
0); /* No offset */
|
||||
dev->ss_lcnt =
|
||||
i2c_dw_scl_lcnt(dev,
|
||||
@ -105,7 +104,6 @@ static int i2c_dw_set_timings_master(struct dw_i2c_dev *dev)
|
||||
ic_clk,
|
||||
260, /* tHIGH = 260 ns */
|
||||
sda_falling_time,
|
||||
0, /* DW default */
|
||||
0); /* No offset */
|
||||
dev->fs_lcnt =
|
||||
i2c_dw_scl_lcnt(dev,
|
||||
@ -129,7 +127,6 @@ static int i2c_dw_set_timings_master(struct dw_i2c_dev *dev)
|
||||
ic_clk,
|
||||
600, /* tHD;STA = tHIGH = 0.6 us */
|
||||
sda_falling_time,
|
||||
0, /* 0: DW default, 1: Ideal */
|
||||
0); /* No offset */
|
||||
dev->fs_lcnt =
|
||||
i2c_dw_scl_lcnt(dev,
|
||||
@ -161,7 +158,6 @@ static int i2c_dw_set_timings_master(struct dw_i2c_dev *dev)
|
||||
ic_clk,
|
||||
160, /* tHIGH = 160 ns */
|
||||
sda_falling_time,
|
||||
0, /* DW default */
|
||||
0); /* No offset */
|
||||
dev->hs_lcnt =
|
||||
i2c_dw_scl_lcnt(dev,
|
||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user