mirror of
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git
synced 2025-01-01 10:42:11 +00:00
bpf: Call free_htab_elem() after htab_unlock_bucket()
For htab of maps, when the map is removed from the htab, it may hold the last reference of the map. bpf_map_fd_put_ptr() will invoke bpf_map_free_id() to free the id of the removed map element. However, bpf_map_fd_put_ptr() is invoked while holding a bucket lock (raw_spin_lock_t), and bpf_map_free_id() attempts to acquire map_idr_lock (spinlock_t), triggering the following lockdep warning: ============================= [ BUG: Invalid wait context ] 6.11.0-rc4+ #49 Not tainted ----------------------------- test_maps/4881 is trying to lock: ffffffff84884578 (map_idr_lock){+...}-{3:3}, at: bpf_map_free_id.part.0+0x21/0x70 other info that might help us debug this: context-{5:5} 2 locks held by test_maps/4881: #0: ffffffff846caf60 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:3}, at: bpf_fd_htab_map_update_elem+0xf9/0x270 #1: ffff888149ced148 (&htab->lockdep_key#2){....}-{2:2}, at: htab_map_update_elem+0x178/0xa80 stack backtrace: CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 4881 Comm: test_maps Not tainted 6.11.0-rc4+ #49 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), ... Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl+0x6e/0xb0 dump_stack+0x10/0x20 __lock_acquire+0x73e/0x36c0 lock_acquire+0x182/0x450 _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x43/0x70 bpf_map_free_id.part.0+0x21/0x70 bpf_map_put+0xcf/0x110 bpf_map_fd_put_ptr+0x9a/0xb0 free_htab_elem+0x69/0xe0 htab_map_update_elem+0x50f/0xa80 bpf_fd_htab_map_update_elem+0x131/0x270 htab_map_update_elem+0x50f/0xa80 bpf_fd_htab_map_update_elem+0x131/0x270 bpf_map_update_value+0x266/0x380 __sys_bpf+0x21bb/0x36b0 __x64_sys_bpf+0x45/0x60 x64_sys_call+0x1b2a/0x20d0 do_syscall_64+0x5d/0x100 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e One way to fix the lockdep warning is using raw_spinlock_t for map_idr_lock as well. However, bpf_map_alloc_id() invokes idr_alloc_cyclic() after acquiring map_idr_lock, it will trigger a similar lockdep warning because the slab's lock (s->cpu_slab->lock) is still a spinlock. Instead of changing map_idr_lock's type, fix the issue by invoking htab_put_fd_value() after htab_unlock_bucket(). However, only deferring the invocation of htab_put_fd_value() is not enough, because the old map pointers in htab of maps can not be saved during batched deletion. Therefore, also defer the invocation of free_htab_elem(), so these to-be-freed elements could be linked together similar to lru map. There are four callers for ->map_fd_put_ptr: (1) alloc_htab_elem() (through htab_put_fd_value()) It invokes ->map_fd_put_ptr() under a raw_spinlock_t. The invocation of htab_put_fd_value() can not simply move after htab_unlock_bucket(), because the old element has already been stashed in htab->extra_elems. It may be reused immediately after htab_unlock_bucket() and the invocation of htab_put_fd_value() after htab_unlock_bucket() may release the newly-added element incorrectly. Therefore, saving the map pointer of the old element for htab of maps before unlocking the bucket and releasing the map_ptr after unlock. Beside the map pointer in the old element, should do the same thing for the special fields in the old element as well. (2) free_htab_elem() (through htab_put_fd_value()) Its caller includes __htab_map_lookup_and_delete_elem(), htab_map_delete_elem() and __htab_map_lookup_and_delete_batch(). For htab_map_delete_elem(), simply invoke free_htab_elem() after htab_unlock_bucket(). For __htab_map_lookup_and_delete_batch(), just like lru map, linking the to-be-freed element into node_to_free list and invoking free_htab_elem() for these element after unlock. It is safe to reuse batch_flink as the link for node_to_free, because these elements have been removed from the hash llist. Because htab of maps doesn't support lookup_and_delete operation, __htab_map_lookup_and_delete_elem() doesn't have the problem, so kept it as is. (3) fd_htab_map_free() It invokes ->map_fd_put_ptr without raw_spinlock_t. (4) bpf_fd_htab_map_update_elem() It invokes ->map_fd_put_ptr without raw_spinlock_t. After moving free_htab_elem() outside htab bucket lock scope, using pcpu_freelist_push() instead of __pcpu_freelist_push() to disable the irq before freeing elements, and protecting the invocations of bpf_mem_cache_free() with migrate_{disable|enable} pair. Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241106063542.357743-2-houtao@huaweicloud.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
269e7c97ca
commit
b9e9ed90b1
@ -896,9 +896,12 @@ static int htab_map_get_next_key(struct bpf_map *map, void *key, void *next_key)
|
||||
static void htab_elem_free(struct bpf_htab *htab, struct htab_elem *l)
|
||||
{
|
||||
check_and_free_fields(htab, l);
|
||||
|
||||
migrate_disable();
|
||||
if (htab->map.map_type == BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERCPU_HASH)
|
||||
bpf_mem_cache_free(&htab->pcpu_ma, l->ptr_to_pptr);
|
||||
bpf_mem_cache_free(&htab->ma, l);
|
||||
migrate_enable();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static void htab_put_fd_value(struct bpf_htab *htab, struct htab_elem *l)
|
||||
@ -948,7 +951,7 @@ static void free_htab_elem(struct bpf_htab *htab, struct htab_elem *l)
|
||||
if (htab_is_prealloc(htab)) {
|
||||
bpf_map_dec_elem_count(&htab->map);
|
||||
check_and_free_fields(htab, l);
|
||||
__pcpu_freelist_push(&htab->freelist, &l->fnode);
|
||||
pcpu_freelist_push(&htab->freelist, &l->fnode);
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
dec_elem_count(htab);
|
||||
htab_elem_free(htab, l);
|
||||
@ -1018,7 +1021,6 @@ static struct htab_elem *alloc_htab_elem(struct bpf_htab *htab, void *key,
|
||||
*/
|
||||
pl_new = this_cpu_ptr(htab->extra_elems);
|
||||
l_new = *pl_new;
|
||||
htab_put_fd_value(htab, old_elem);
|
||||
*pl_new = old_elem;
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
struct pcpu_freelist_node *l;
|
||||
@ -1105,6 +1107,7 @@ static long htab_map_update_elem(struct bpf_map *map, void *key, void *value,
|
||||
struct htab_elem *l_new = NULL, *l_old;
|
||||
struct hlist_nulls_head *head;
|
||||
unsigned long flags;
|
||||
void *old_map_ptr;
|
||||
struct bucket *b;
|
||||
u32 key_size, hash;
|
||||
int ret;
|
||||
@ -1183,12 +1186,27 @@ static long htab_map_update_elem(struct bpf_map *map, void *key, void *value,
|
||||
hlist_nulls_add_head_rcu(&l_new->hash_node, head);
|
||||
if (l_old) {
|
||||
hlist_nulls_del_rcu(&l_old->hash_node);
|
||||
|
||||
/* l_old has already been stashed in htab->extra_elems, free
|
||||
* its special fields before it is available for reuse. Also
|
||||
* save the old map pointer in htab of maps before unlock
|
||||
* and release it after unlock.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
old_map_ptr = NULL;
|
||||
if (htab_is_prealloc(htab)) {
|
||||
if (map->ops->map_fd_put_ptr)
|
||||
old_map_ptr = fd_htab_map_get_ptr(map, l_old);
|
||||
check_and_free_fields(htab, l_old);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
htab_unlock_bucket(htab, b, hash, flags);
|
||||
if (l_old) {
|
||||
if (old_map_ptr)
|
||||
map->ops->map_fd_put_ptr(map, old_map_ptr, true);
|
||||
if (!htab_is_prealloc(htab))
|
||||
free_htab_elem(htab, l_old);
|
||||
else
|
||||
check_and_free_fields(htab, l_old);
|
||||
}
|
||||
ret = 0;
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
err:
|
||||
htab_unlock_bucket(htab, b, hash, flags);
|
||||
return ret;
|
||||
@ -1432,15 +1450,15 @@ static long htab_map_delete_elem(struct bpf_map *map, void *key)
|
||||
return ret;
|
||||
|
||||
l = lookup_elem_raw(head, hash, key, key_size);
|
||||
|
||||
if (l) {
|
||||
if (l)
|
||||
hlist_nulls_del_rcu(&l->hash_node);
|
||||
free_htab_elem(htab, l);
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
else
|
||||
ret = -ENOENT;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
htab_unlock_bucket(htab, b, hash, flags);
|
||||
|
||||
if (l)
|
||||
free_htab_elem(htab, l);
|
||||
return ret;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@ -1853,13 +1871,14 @@ __htab_map_lookup_and_delete_batch(struct bpf_map *map,
|
||||
* may cause deadlock. See comments in function
|
||||
* prealloc_lru_pop(). Let us do bpf_lru_push_free()
|
||||
* after releasing the bucket lock.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* For htab of maps, htab_put_fd_value() in
|
||||
* free_htab_elem() may acquire a spinlock with bucket
|
||||
* lock being held and it violates the lock rule, so
|
||||
* invoke free_htab_elem() after unlock as well.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (is_lru_map) {
|
||||
l->batch_flink = node_to_free;
|
||||
node_to_free = l;
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
free_htab_elem(htab, l);
|
||||
}
|
||||
l->batch_flink = node_to_free;
|
||||
node_to_free = l;
|
||||
}
|
||||
dst_key += key_size;
|
||||
dst_val += value_size;
|
||||
@ -1871,7 +1890,10 @@ __htab_map_lookup_and_delete_batch(struct bpf_map *map,
|
||||
while (node_to_free) {
|
||||
l = node_to_free;
|
||||
node_to_free = node_to_free->batch_flink;
|
||||
htab_lru_push_free(htab, l);
|
||||
if (is_lru_map)
|
||||
htab_lru_push_free(htab, l);
|
||||
else
|
||||
free_htab_elem(htab, l);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
next_batch:
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user