mirror of
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git
synced 2025-01-12 00:38:55 +00:00
drm: Remove utterly bogus preempt_disable() sections
commit 27641c3f (drm/vblank: Add support for precise vblank timestamping) adds preempt_disable()/enable() around a spin locked section with the comments: * Disable preemption, so vblank_time_lock is held as short as * possible, even under a kernel with PREEMPT_RT patches. /* Disable preemption while holding vblank_time_lock. Do * it explicitely to guard against PREEMPT_RT kernel. Just that this has never been tested on a RT kernel which would have granted that nonsense with a might_sleep() warning because dev->vblank_time_lock is converted to a "sleeping" spinlock on RT. So this is activly wrong on RT and superflous on mainline. Remove it. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Acked-by: Mario Kleiner <mario.kleiner@tuebingen.mpg.de> Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
a7c36fd8c5
commit
d53dab3ae1
@ -110,10 +110,7 @@ static void vblank_disable_and_save(struct drm_device *dev, int crtc)
|
||||
/* Prevent vblank irq processing while disabling vblank irqs,
|
||||
* so no updates of timestamps or count can happen after we've
|
||||
* disabled. Needed to prevent races in case of delayed irq's.
|
||||
* Disable preemption, so vblank_time_lock is held as short as
|
||||
* possible, even under a kernel with PREEMPT_RT patches.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
preempt_disable();
|
||||
spin_lock_irqsave(&dev->vblank_time_lock, irqflags);
|
||||
|
||||
dev->driver->disable_vblank(dev, crtc);
|
||||
@ -164,7 +161,6 @@ static void vblank_disable_and_save(struct drm_device *dev, int crtc)
|
||||
clear_vblank_timestamps(dev, crtc);
|
||||
|
||||
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev->vblank_time_lock, irqflags);
|
||||
preempt_enable();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static void vblank_disable_fn(unsigned long arg)
|
||||
@ -889,10 +885,6 @@ int drm_vblank_get(struct drm_device *dev, int crtc)
|
||||
spin_lock_irqsave(&dev->vbl_lock, irqflags);
|
||||
/* Going from 0->1 means we have to enable interrupts again */
|
||||
if (atomic_add_return(1, &dev->vblank_refcount[crtc]) == 1) {
|
||||
/* Disable preemption while holding vblank_time_lock. Do
|
||||
* it explicitely to guard against PREEMPT_RT kernel.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
preempt_disable();
|
||||
spin_lock_irqsave(&dev->vblank_time_lock, irqflags2);
|
||||
if (!dev->vblank_enabled[crtc]) {
|
||||
/* Enable vblank irqs under vblank_time_lock protection.
|
||||
@ -912,7 +904,6 @@ int drm_vblank_get(struct drm_device *dev, int crtc)
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev->vblank_time_lock, irqflags2);
|
||||
preempt_enable();
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
if (!dev->vblank_enabled[crtc]) {
|
||||
atomic_dec(&dev->vblank_refcount[crtc]);
|
||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user