Kernel/linux-next
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git synced 2025-01-17 22:05:08 +00:00
Code Issues Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

gro_cells: avoid using synchronize_rcu() in gro_cells_destroy()

Browse Source 
Another thing making netns dismantles potentially very slow is located
in gro_cells_destroy(),
whenever cleanup_net() has to remove a device using gro_cells framework.

RTNL is not held at this stage, so synchronize_net()
is calling synchronize_rcu():

netdev_run_todo()
 ip_tunnel_dev_free()
  gro_cells_destroy()
   synchronize_net()
    synchronize_rcu() // Ouch.

This patch uses call_rcu(), and gave me a 25x performance improvement
in my tests.

cleanup_net() is no longer blocked ~10 ms per synchronize_rcu()
call.

In the case we could not allocate the memory needed to queue the
deferred free, use synchronize_rcu_expedited()

v2: made percpu_free_defer_callback() static

Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Acked-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220220041155.607637-1-eric.dumazet@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
Eric Dumazet 2022-02-19 20:11:55 -08:00 committed by Jakub Kicinski
parent d4276e570a
commit ee8f97efa7
1 changed files with 31 additions and 5 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

36
net/core/gro_cells.c
View File

@ -89,8 +89,23 @@ int gro_cells_init(struct gro_cells *gcells, struct net_device *dev)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(gro_cells_init);
struct percpu_free_defer {
struct rcu_head rcu;
void __percpu *ptr;
};
static void percpu_free_defer_callback(struct rcu_head *head)
{
struct percpu_free_defer *defer;
defer = container_of(head, struct percpu_free_defer, rcu);
free_percpu(defer->ptr);
kfree(defer);
}
void gro_cells_destroy(struct gro_cells *gcells)
{
struct percpu_free_defer *defer;
int i;
if (!gcells->cells)
@ -102,12 +117,23 @@ void gro_cells_destroy(struct gro_cells *gcells)
__netif_napi_del(&cell->napi);
__skb_queue_purge(&cell->napi_skbs);
}
/* This barrier is needed because netpoll could access dev->napi_list
* under rcu protection.
/* We need to observe an rcu grace period before freeing ->cells,
* because netpoll could access dev->napi_list under rcu protection.
* Try hard using call_rcu() instead of synchronize_rcu(),
* because we might be called from cleanup_net(), and we
* definitely do not want to block this critical task.
*/
synchronize_net();
free_percpu(gcells->cells);
defer = kmalloc(sizeof(*defer), GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_NOWARN);
if (likely(defer)) {
defer->ptr = gcells->cells;
call_rcu(&defer->rcu, percpu_free_defer_callback);
} else {
/* We do not hold RTNL at this point, synchronize_net()
* would not be able to expedite this sync.
*/
synchronize_rcu_expedited();
free_percpu(gcells->cells);
}
gcells->cells = NULL;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(gro_cells_destroy);