Currently, srcu_read_lock_lite() uses the SRCU_READ_FLAVOR_LITE bit in
->srcu_reader_flavor to communicate to the grace-period processing in
srcu_readers_active_idx_check() that the smp_mb() must be replaced by a
synchronize_rcu(). Unfortunately, ->srcu_reader_flavor is not updated
unless the kernel is built with CONFIG_PROVE_RCU=y. Therefore in all
kernels built with CONFIG_PROVE_RCU=n, srcu_readers_active_idx_check()
incorrectly uses smp_mb() instead of synchronize_rcu() for srcu_struct
structures whose readers use srcu_read_lock_lite().
This commit therefore causes Tree SRCU srcu_read_lock_lite()
to unconditionally update ->srcu_reader_flavor so that
srcu_readers_active_idx_check() can make the correct choice.
Reported-by: Neeraj Upadhyay <Neeraj.Upadhyay@amd.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/d07e8f4a-d5ff-4c8e-8e61-50db285c57e9@amd.com/
Fixes: c0f08d6b5a61 ("srcu: Add srcu_read_lock_lite() and srcu_read_unlock_lite()")
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Neeraj Upadhyay <Neeraj.Upadhyay@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
If srcu_read_lock_lite() is used on a given srcu_struct structure, then
the grace-period processing must do synchronize_rcu() instead of smp_mb()
between the scans of the ->srcu_unlock_count[] and ->srcu_lock_count[]
counters. Currently, it does that by testing the SRCU_READ_FLAVOR_LITE
bit of the ->srcu_reader_flavor mask, which works well. But only if
the CPU running that srcu_struct structure's grace period has previously
executed srcu_read_lock_lite(), which might not be the case, especially
just after that srcu_struct structure has been created and initialized.
This commit therefore updates the srcu_readers_unlock_idx() function
to OR together the ->srcu_reader_flavor masks from all CPUs, and
then make the srcu_readers_active_idx_check() function that test the
SRCU_READ_FLAVOR_LITE bit in the resulting mask.
Note that the srcu_readers_unlock_idx() function is already scanning all
the CPUs to sum up the ->srcu_unlock_count[] fields and that this is on
the grace-period slow path, hence no concerns about the small amount of
extra work.
Reported-by: Neeraj Upadhyay <Neeraj.Upadhyay@amd.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/d07e8f4a-d5ff-4c8e-8e61-50db285c57e9@amd.com/
Fixes: c0f08d6b5a61 ("srcu: Add srcu_read_lock_lite() and srcu_read_unlock_lite()")
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Neeraj Upadhyay <Neeraj.Upadhyay@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
This commit moves __srcu_read_lock_lite() and __srcu_read_unlock_lite()
into include/linux/srcu.h and marks them "static inline" so that they
can be inlined into srcu_read_lock_lite() and srcu_read_unlock_lite(),
respectively. They are not hand-inlined due to Tree SRCU and Tiny SRCU
having different implementations.
The earlier removal of smp_mb() combined with the inlining produce
significant single-percentage performance wins.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAEf4BzYgiNmSb=ZKQ65tm6nJDi1UX2Gq26cdHSH1mPwXJYZj5g@mail.gmail.com/
Reported-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Cc: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
Cc: <bpf@vger.kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Neeraj Upadhyay <Neeraj.Upadhyay@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
This patch adds srcu_read_lock_lite() and srcu_read_unlock_lite(), which
dispense with the read-side smp_mb() but also are restricted to code
regions that RCU is watching. If a given srcu_struct structure uses
srcu_read_lock_lite() and srcu_read_unlock_lite(), it is not permitted
to use any other SRCU read-side marker, before, during, or after.
Another price of light-weight readers is heavier weight grace periods.
Such readers mean that SRCU grace periods on srcu_struct structures
used by light-weight readers will incur at least two calls to
synchronize_rcu(). In addition, normal SRCU grace periods for
light-weight-reader srcu_struct structures never auto-expedite.
Note that expedited SRCU grace periods for light-weight-reader
srcu_struct structures still invoke synchronize_rcu(), not
synchronize_srcu_expedited(). Something about wishing to keep
the IPIs down to a dull roar.
The srcu_read_lock_lite() and srcu_read_unlock_lite() functions may not
(repeat, *not*) be used from NMI handlers, but if this is needed, an
additional flavor of SRCU reader can be added by some future commit.
[ paulmck: Apply Alexei Starovoitov expediting feedback. ]
[ paulmck: Apply kernel test robot feedback. ]
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Tested-by: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Cc: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
Cc: <bpf@vger.kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Neeraj Upadhyay <Neeraj.Upadhyay@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
This commit creates SRCU_READ_FLAVOR_NORMAL and SRCU_READ_FLAVOR_NMI
C-preprocessor macros for srcu_read_lock() and srcu_read_lock_nmisafe(),
respectively. These replace the old true/false values that were
previously passed to srcu_check_read_flavor(). In addition, the
srcu_check_read_flavor() function itself requires a bit of rework to
handle bitmasks instead of true/false values.
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Cc: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
Cc: <bpf@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Neeraj Upadhyay <Neeraj.Upadhyay@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Currently, there are only two flavors of readers, normal and NMI-safe.
Very straightforward state updates suffice to check for erroneous
mixing of reader flavors on a given srcu_struct structure. This commit
upgrades the checking in preparation for the addition of light-weight
(as in memory-barrier-free) readers.
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Cc: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
Cc: <bpf@vger.kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Neeraj Upadhyay <Neeraj.Upadhyay@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Currently, there are only two flavors of readers, normal and NMI-safe.
A number of fields, functions, and types reflect this restriction.
This renaming-only commit prepares for the addition of light-weight
(as in memory-barrier-free) readers. OK, OK, there is also a drive-by
white-space fixeup!
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Cc: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
Cc: <bpf@vger.kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Neeraj Upadhyay <Neeraj.Upadhyay@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Even though the open-coded expressions usually fit on one line, this
commit replaces them with a call to a new srcu_gp_is_expedited()
helper function in order to improve readability.
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Cc: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
Cc: <bpf@vger.kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Neeraj Upadhyay <Neeraj.Upadhyay@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
SRCU auto-expedites grace periods that follow a sufficiently long idle
period, and the srcu_might_be_idle() function is used to make this
decision. However, the upcoming light-weight SRCU readers will not do
auto-expediting because doing so would cause the grace-period machinery
to invoke synchronize_rcu_expedited() twice, with IPIs all around.
However, software-engineering considerations force this determination
to remain in srcu_might_be_idle().
This commit therefore changes the name of srcu_might_be_idle() to
srcu_should_expedite(), thus moving from what it currently does to why
it does it, this latter being more future-proof.
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Cc: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
Cc: <bpf@vger.kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Neeraj Upadhyay <Neeraj.Upadhyay@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
The value of ARRAY_SIZE() can be determined at compile time, so if both
sides of the equation are ARRAY_SIZE(), using BUILD_BUG_ON() can help us
catch the problem earlier.
While there are cases where unequal array sizes will work, there is no
point in allowing them, so it makes more sense to force them to be equal
using BUILD_BUG_ON().
Signed-off-by: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
SRCU keeps a count of the number of callbacks that the current
srcu_barrier() is waiting on, but there is currently no easy way to
work out which callback is stuck. One way to do this is to mark idle
SRCU-barrier callbacks by making the ->next pointer point to the callback
itself, and this commit does just that.
Later commits will use this for debug output.
Signed-off-by: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org>
SRCU maintains the ->srcu_n_exp_nodelay and ->reschedule_count values
to guide heuristics governing auto-expediting of normal SRCU grace
periods and grace-period-state-machine delays. This commit adds KCSAN
ASSERT_EXCLUSIVE_WRITER() calls to check for concurrent updates to
these fields.
Signed-off-by: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org>
Using a higher value for the initial gp sequence counters allows for
wrapping to occur faster. It can help with surfacing any issues that may
be happening as a result of the wrap around.
Signed-off-by: JP Kobryn <inwardvessel@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org>
This commit adds the get_completed_synchronize_srcu() and the
same_state_synchronize_srcu() functions. The first returns a cookie
that is always interpreted as corresponding to an expired grace period.
The second does an equality comparison of a pair of cookies.
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Cc: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
Now that we have polled SRCU grace periods, a grace period can be
started by start_poll_synchronize_srcu() as well as call_srcu(),
synchronize_srcu(), and synchronize_srcu_expedited(). This commit
therefore calls out this new start_poll_synchronize_srcu() possibility
in the comment on the WARN_ON().
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Interrupts are enabled in srcu_gp_end(), so this commit switches from
spin_lock_irqsave_rcu_node() and spin_unlock_irqrestore_rcu_node()
to spin_lock_irq_rcu_node() and spin_unlock_irq_rcu_node().
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/febb13ab-a4bb-48b4-8e97-7e9f7749e6da@moroto.mountain/
Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
This commit make rcu-tasks related rcutorture test support rcu-tasks
gp state printing when the writer stall occurs or the at the end of
rcutorture test, and generate rcu_ops->get_gp_data() operation to
simplify the acquisition of gp state for different types of rcutorture
tests.
Signed-off-by: Zqiang <qiang.zhang1211@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) <urezki@gmail.com>
The comments added in commit 1ef990c4b36b ("srcu: No need to
advance/accelerate if no callback enqueued") are a bit confusing.
The comments are describing a scenario for code that was moved and is
no longer the way it was (snapshot after advancing). Improve the code
comments to reflect this and also document why acceleration can never
fail.
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Cc: Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraj.iitr10@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
If an SRCU barrier is queued while callbacks are running and a new
callbacks invocator for the same sdp were to run concurrently, the
RCU barrier might execute too early. As this requirement is non-obvious,
make sure to keep a record.
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Neeraj Upadhyay (AMD) <neeraj.iitr10@gmail.com>
While in grace period start, there is nothing to accelerate and
therefore no need to advance the callbacks either if no callback is
to be enqueued.
Spare these needless operations in this case.
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Neeraj Upadhyay (AMD) <neeraj.iitr10@gmail.com>
Callbacks advancing on SRCU must be performed on two specific places:
1) On enqueue time in order to make room for the acceleration of the
new callback.
2) On invocation time in order to move the callbacks ready to invoke.
Any other callback advancing callsite is needless. Remove the remaining
one in srcu_gp_start().
Co-developed-by: Yong He <zhuangel570@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Yong He <zhuangel570@gmail.com>
Co-developed-by: Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Co-developed-by: Neeraj Upadhyay (AMD) <neeraj.iitr10@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Neeraj Upadhyay (AMD) <neeraj.iitr10@gmail.com>
Acceleration in SRCU happens on enqueue time for each new callback. This
operation is expected not to fail and therefore any similar attempt
from other places shouldn't find any remaining callbacks to accelerate.
Moreover accelerations performed beyond enqueue time are error prone
because rcu_seq_snap() then may return the snapshot for a new grace
period that is not going to be started.
Remove these dangerous and needless accelerations and introduce instead
assertions reporting leaking unaccelerated callbacks beyond enqueue
time.
Co-developed-by: Yong He <alexyonghe@tencent.com>
Signed-off-by: Yong He <alexyonghe@tencent.com>
Co-developed-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Co-developed-by: Neeraj upadhyay <Neeraj.Upadhyay@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Neeraj upadhyay <Neeraj.Upadhyay@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Like Xu <likexu@tencent.com>
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
SRCU callbacks acceleration might fail if the preceding callbacks
advance also fails. This can happen when the following steps are met:
1) The RCU_WAIT_TAIL segment has callbacks (say for gp_num 8) and the
RCU_NEXT_READY_TAIL also has callbacks (say for gp_num 12).
2) The grace period for RCU_WAIT_TAIL is observed as started but not yet
completed so rcu_seq_current() returns 4 + SRCU_STATE_SCAN1 = 5.
3) This value is passed to rcu_segcblist_advance() which can't move
any segment forward and fails.
4) srcu_gp_start_if_needed() still proceeds with callback acceleration.
But then the call to rcu_seq_snap() observes the grace period for the
RCU_WAIT_TAIL segment (gp_num 8) as completed and the subsequent one
for the RCU_NEXT_READY_TAIL segment as started
(ie: 8 + SRCU_STATE_SCAN1 = 9) so it returns a snapshot of the
next grace period, which is 16.
5) The value of 16 is passed to rcu_segcblist_accelerate() but the
freshly enqueued callback in RCU_NEXT_TAIL can't move to
RCU_NEXT_READY_TAIL which already has callbacks for a previous grace
period (gp_num = 12). So acceleration fails.
6) Note in all these steps, srcu_invoke_callbacks() hadn't had a chance
to run srcu_invoke_callbacks().
Then some very bad outcome may happen if the following happens:
7) Some other CPU races and starts the grace period number 16 before the
CPU handling previous steps had a chance. Therefore srcu_gp_start()
isn't called on the latter sdp to fix the acceleration leak from
previous steps with a new pair of call to advance/accelerate.
8) The grace period 16 completes and srcu_invoke_callbacks() is finally
called. All the callbacks from previous grace periods (8 and 12) are
correctly advanced and executed but callbacks in RCU_NEXT_READY_TAIL
still remain. Then rcu_segcblist_accelerate() is called with a
snaphot of 20.
9) Since nothing started the grace period number 20, callbacks stay
unhandled.
This has been reported in real load:
[3144162.608392] INFO: task kworker/136:12:252684 blocked for more
than 122 seconds.
[3144162.615986] Tainted: G O K 5.4.203-1-tlinux4-0011.1 #1
[3144162.623053] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs"
disables this message.
[3144162.631162] kworker/136:12 D 0 252684 2 0x90004000
[3144162.631189] Workqueue: kvm-irqfd-cleanup irqfd_shutdown [kvm]
[3144162.631192] Call Trace:
[3144162.631202] __schedule+0x2ee/0x660
[3144162.631206] schedule+0x33/0xa0
[3144162.631209] schedule_timeout+0x1c4/0x340
[3144162.631214] ? update_load_avg+0x82/0x660
[3144162.631217] ? raw_spin_rq_lock_nested+0x1f/0x30
[3144162.631218] wait_for_completion+0x119/0x180
[3144162.631220] ? wake_up_q+0x80/0x80
[3144162.631224] __synchronize_srcu.part.19+0x81/0xb0
[3144162.631226] ? __bpf_trace_rcu_utilization+0x10/0x10
[3144162.631227] synchronize_srcu+0x5f/0xc0
[3144162.631236] irqfd_shutdown+0x3c/0xb0 [kvm]
[3144162.631239] ? __schedule+0x2f6/0x660
[3144162.631243] process_one_work+0x19a/0x3a0
[3144162.631244] worker_thread+0x37/0x3a0
[3144162.631247] kthread+0x117/0x140
[3144162.631247] ? process_one_work+0x3a0/0x3a0
[3144162.631248] ? __kthread_cancel_work+0x40/0x40
[3144162.631250] ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30
Fix this with taking the snapshot for acceleration _before_ the read
of the current grace period number.
The only side effect of this solution is that callbacks advancing happen
then _after_ the full barrier in rcu_seq_snap(). This is not a problem
because that barrier only cares about:
1) Ordering accesses of the update side before call_srcu() so they don't
bleed.
2) See all the accesses prior to the grace period of the current gp_num
The only things callbacks advancing need to be ordered against are
carried by snp locking.
Reported-by: Yong He <alexyonghe@tencent.com>
Co-developed-by:: Yong He <alexyonghe@tencent.com>
Signed-off-by: Yong He <alexyonghe@tencent.com>
Co-developed-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Co-developed-by: Neeraj upadhyay <Neeraj.Upadhyay@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Neeraj upadhyay <Neeraj.Upadhyay@amd.com>
Link: http://lore.kernel.org/CANZk6aR+CqZaqmMWrC2eRRPY12qAZnDZLwLnHZbNi=xXMB401g@mail.gmail.com
Fixes: da915ad5cf25 ("srcu: Parallelize callback handling")
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
The value of a bitwise expression 1 << (cpu - sdp->mynode->grplo)
is subject to overflow due to a failure to cast operands to a larger
data type before performing the bitwise operation.
The maximum result of this subtraction is defined by the RCU_FANOUT_LEAF
Kconfig option, which on 64-bit systems defaults to 16 (resulting in a
maximum shift of 15), but which can be set up as high as 64 (resulting
in a maximum shift of 63). A value of 31 can result in sign extension,
resulting in 0xffffffff80000000 instead of the desired 0x80000000.
A value of 32 or greater triggers undefined behavior per the C standard.
This bug has not been known to cause issues because almost all kernels
take the default CONFIG_RCU_FANOUT_LEAF=16. Furthermore, as long as a
given compiler gives a deterministic non-zero result for 1<<N for N>=32,
the code correctly invokes all SRCU callbacks, albeit wasting CPU time
along the way.
This commit therefore substitutes the correct 1UL for the buggy 1.
Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.
Signed-off-by: Denis Arefev <arefev@swemel.ru>
Reviewed-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
Reviewed-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Cc: David Laight <David.Laight@aculab.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
When a structure containing an RCU callback rhp is (incorrectly) freed
and reallocated after rhp is passed to call_rcu(), it is not unusual for
rhp->func to be set to NULL. This defeats the debugging prints used by
__call_rcu_common() in kernels built with CONFIG_DEBUG_OBJECTS_RCU_HEAD=y,
which expect to identify the offending code using the identity of this
function.
And in kernels build without CONFIG_DEBUG_OBJECTS_RCU_HEAD=y, things
are even worse, as can be seen from this splat:
Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 0
... ...
PC is at 0x0
LR is at rcu_do_batch+0x1c0/0x3b8
... ...
(rcu_do_batch) from (rcu_core+0x1d4/0x284)
(rcu_core) from (__do_softirq+0x24c/0x344)
(__do_softirq) from (__irq_exit_rcu+0x64/0x108)
(__irq_exit_rcu) from (irq_exit+0x8/0x10)
(irq_exit) from (__handle_domain_irq+0x74/0x9c)
(__handle_domain_irq) from (gic_handle_irq+0x8c/0x98)
(gic_handle_irq) from (__irq_svc+0x5c/0x94)
(__irq_svc) from (arch_cpu_idle+0x20/0x3c)
(arch_cpu_idle) from (default_idle_call+0x4c/0x78)
(default_idle_call) from (do_idle+0xf8/0x150)
(do_idle) from (cpu_startup_entry+0x18/0x20)
(cpu_startup_entry) from (0xc01530)
This commit therefore adds calls to mem_dump_obj(rhp) to output some
information, for example:
slab kmalloc-256 start ffff410c45019900 pointer offset 0 size 256
This provides the rough size of the memory block and the offset of the
rcu_head structure, which as least provides at least a few clues to help
locate the problem. If the problem is reproducible, additional slab
debugging can be enabled, for example, CONFIG_DEBUG_SLAB=y, which can
provide significantly more information.
Signed-off-by: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
The current error handling in init_srcu_struct_fields() is a bit
inconsistent. If init_srcu_struct_nodes() fails, the function either
returns -ENOMEM or 0 depending on whether ssp->sda_is_static is true or
false. This can make init_srcu_struct_fields() return 0 even if memory
allocation failed!
Simplify the error handling by always returning -ENOMEM if either
init_srcu_struct_nodes() or the per-CPU allocation fails. This makes the
control flow easier to follow and avoids the inconsistent return values.
Add goto labels to avoid duplicating the error cleanup code.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230404003508.GA254019@google.com
Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
There is an smp_mb() named "E" in srcu_flip() immediately before the
increment (flip) of the srcu_struct structure's ->srcu_idx.
The purpose of E is to order the preceding scan's read of lock counters
against the flipping of the ->srcu_idx, in order to prevent new readers
from continuing to use the old ->srcu_idx value, which might needlessly
extend the grace period.
However, this ordering is already enforced because of the control
dependency between the preceding scan and the ->srcu_idx flip.
This control dependency exists because atomic_long_read() is used
to scan the counts, because WRITE_ONCE() is used to flip ->srcu_idx,
and because ->srcu_idx is not flipped until the ->srcu_lock_count[] and
->srcu_unlock_count[] counts match. And such a match cannot happen when
there is an in-flight reader that started before the flip (observation
courtesy Mathieu Desnoyers).
The litmus test below (courtesy of Frederic Weisbecker, with changes
for ctrldep by Boqun and Joel) shows this:
C srcu
(*
* bad condition: P0's first scan (SCAN1) saw P1's idx=0 LOCK count inc, though P1 saw flip.
*
* So basically, the ->po ordering on both P0 and P1 is enforced via ->ppo
* (control deps) on both sides, and both P0 and P1 are interconnected by ->rf
* relations. Combining the ->ppo with ->rf, a cycle is impossible.
*)
{}
// updater
P0(int *IDX, int *LOCK0, int *UNLOCK0, int *LOCK1, int *UNLOCK1)
{
int lock1;
int unlock1;
int lock0;
int unlock0;
// SCAN1
unlock1 = READ_ONCE(*UNLOCK1);
smp_mb(); // A
lock1 = READ_ONCE(*LOCK1);
// FLIP
if (lock1 == unlock1) { // Control dep
smp_mb(); // E // Remove E and still passes.
WRITE_ONCE(*IDX, 1);
smp_mb(); // D
// SCAN2
unlock0 = READ_ONCE(*UNLOCK0);
smp_mb(); // A
lock0 = READ_ONCE(*LOCK0);
}
}
// reader
P1(int *IDX, int *LOCK0, int *UNLOCK0, int *LOCK1, int *UNLOCK1)
{
int tmp;
int idx1;
int idx2;
// 1st reader
idx1 = READ_ONCE(*IDX);
if (idx1 == 0) { // Control dep
tmp = READ_ONCE(*LOCK0);
WRITE_ONCE(*LOCK0, tmp + 1);
smp_mb(); /* B and C */
tmp = READ_ONCE(*UNLOCK0);
WRITE_ONCE(*UNLOCK0, tmp + 1);
} else {
tmp = READ_ONCE(*LOCK1);
WRITE_ONCE(*LOCK1, tmp + 1);
smp_mb(); /* B and C */
tmp = READ_ONCE(*UNLOCK1);
WRITE_ONCE(*UNLOCK1, tmp + 1);
}
}
exists (0:lock1=1 /\ 1:idx1=1)
More complicated litmus tests with multiple SRCU readers also show that
memory barrier E is not needed.
This commit therefore clarifies the comment on memory barrier E.
Why not also remove that redundant smp_mb()?
Because control dependencies are quite fragile due to their not being
recognized by most compilers and tools. Control dependencies therefore
exact an ongoing maintenance burden, and such a burden cannot be justified
in this slowpath. Therefore, that smp_mb() stays until such time as
its overhead becomes a measurable problem in a real workload running on
a real production system, or until such time as compilers start paying
attention to this sort of control dependency.
Co-developed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Co-developed-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
Signed-off-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
Co-developed-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>
This commit creates an srcu_usage pointer named "sup" as a shorter
synonym for the "ssp->srcu_sup" that was bloating several lines of code.
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Tested-by: Sachin Sant <sachinp@linux.ibm.com>
Tested-by: "Zhang, Qiang1" <qiang1.zhang@intel.com>
Tested-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
This commit creates an srcu_usage pointer named "sup" as a shorter
synonym for the "ssp->srcu_sup" that was bloating several lines of code.
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Tested-by: Sachin Sant <sachinp@linux.ibm.com>
Tested-by: "Zhang, Qiang1" <qiang1.zhang@intel.com>
Tested-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
This commit creates an srcu_usage pointer named "sup" as a shorter
synonym for the "ssp->srcu_sup" that was bloating several lines of code.
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Tested-by: Sachin Sant <sachinp@linux.ibm.com>
Tested-by: "Zhang, Qiang1" <qiang1.zhang@intel.com>
Tested-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
This commit creates an srcu_usage pointer named "sup" as a shorter
synonym for the "ssp->srcu_sup" that was bloating several lines of code.
Tested-by: Sachin Sant <sachinp@linux.ibm.com>
Tested-by: "Zhang, Qiang1" <qiang1.zhang@intel.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Tested-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
If a given statically allocated in-module srcu_struct structure was ever
used for updates, srcu_module_going() will invoke cleanup_srcu_struct()
at module-exit time. This will check for the error case of SRCU readers
persisting past module-exit time. On the other hand, if this srcu_struct
structure never went through a grace period, srcu_module_going() only
invokes free_percpu(), which would result in strange failures if SRCU
readers persisted past module-exit time.
This commit therefore adds a srcu_readers_active() check to
srcu_module_going(), splatting if readers have persisted and refraining
from invoking free_percpu() in that case. Better to leak memory than
to suffer silent memory corruption!
[ paulmck: Apply Zhang, Qiang1 feedback on memory leak. ]
Tested-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
This commit moves the ->reschedule_jiffies, ->reschedule_count, and
->work fields from the srcu_struct structure to the srcu_usage structure
to reduce the size of the former in order to improve cache locality.
However, this means that the container_of() calls cannot get a pointer
to the srcu_struct because they are no longer in the srcu_struct.
This issue is addressed by adding a ->srcu_ssp field in the srcu_usage
structure that references the corresponding srcu_struct structure.
And given the presence of the sup pointer to the srcu_usage structure,
replace some ssp->srcu_usage-> instances with sup->.
[ paulmck Apply feedback from kernel test robot. ]
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202303191400.iO5BOqka-lkp@intel.com/
Suggested-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Tested-by: Sachin Sant <sachinp@linux.ibm.com>
Tested-by: "Zhang, Qiang1" <qiang1.zhang@intel.com>
Tested-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
This commit moves the ->srcu_barrier_seq, ->srcu_barrier_mutex,
->srcu_barrier_completion, and ->srcu_barrier_cpu_cnt fields from the
srcu_struct structure to the srcu_usage structure to reduce the size of
the former in order to improve cache locality.
Suggested-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Tested-by: Sachin Sant <sachinp@linux.ibm.com>
Tested-by: "Zhang, Qiang1" <qiang1.zhang@intel.com>
Tested-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
This commit moves the ->sda_is_static field from the srcu_struct structure
to the srcu_usage structure to reduce the size of the former in order
to improve cache locality.
Suggested-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Tested-by: Sachin Sant <sachinp@linux.ibm.com>
Tested-by: "Zhang, Qiang1" <qiang1.zhang@intel.com>
Tested-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
This commit moves the ->srcu_size_jiffies, ->srcu_n_lock_retries,
and ->srcu_n_exp_nodelay fields from the srcu_struct structure to the
srcu_usage structure to reduce the size of the former in order to improve
cache locality.
Suggested-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Tested-by: Sachin Sant <sachinp@linux.ibm.com>
Tested-by: "Zhang, Qiang1" <qiang1.zhang@intel.com>
Tested-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
This commit moves the ->srcu_gp_seq, ->srcu_gp_seq_needed,
->srcu_gp_seq_needed_exp, ->srcu_gp_start, and ->srcu_last_gp_end fields
from the srcu_struct structure to the srcu_usage structure to reduce
the size of the former in order to improve cache locality.
Suggested-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Tested-by: Sachin Sant <sachinp@linux.ibm.com>
Tested-by: "Zhang, Qiang1" <qiang1.zhang@intel.com>
Tested-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
This commit moves the ->srcu_gp_mutex field from the srcu_struct structure
to the srcu_usage structure to reduce the size of the former in order
to improve cache locality.
Suggested-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Tested-by: Sachin Sant <sachinp@linux.ibm.com>
Tested-by: "Zhang, Qiang1" <qiang1.zhang@intel.com>
Tested-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
This commit moves the ->lock field from the srcu_struct structure to
the srcu_usage structure to reduce the size of the former in order to
improve cache locality.
Suggested-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Tested-by: Sachin Sant <sachinp@linux.ibm.com>
Tested-by: "Zhang, Qiang1" <qiang1.zhang@intel.com>
Tested-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Currently, both __init_srcu_struct() in CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC=y kernels
and init_srcu_struct() in CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC=n kernel initialize
the srcu_struct structure's ->lock before the srcu_usage structure has
been allocated. This of course prevents the ->lock from being moved
to the srcu_usage structure, so this commit moves the initialization
into the init_srcu_struct_fields() after the srcu_usage structure has
been allocated.
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Tested-by: Sachin Sant <sachinp@linux.ibm.com>
Tested-by: "Zhang, Qiang1" <qiang1.zhang@intel.com>
Tested-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
This commit moves the ->srcu_cb_mutex field from the srcu_struct structure
to the srcu_usage structure to reduce the size of the former in order
to improve cache locality.
Suggested-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Tested-by: Sachin Sant <sachinp@linux.ibm.com>
Tested-by: "Zhang, Qiang1" <qiang1.zhang@intel.com>
Tested-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
This commit moves the ->srcu_size_state field from the srcu_struct
structure to the srcu_usage structure to reduce the size of the former
in order to improve cache locality.
Suggested-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Tested-by: Sachin Sant <sachinp@linux.ibm.com>
Tested-by: "Zhang, Qiang1" <qiang1.zhang@intel.com>
Tested-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
This commit moves the ->level[] array from the srcu_struct structure to
the srcu_usage structure to reduce the size of the former in order to
improve cache locality.
Suggested-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Tested-by: Sachin Sant <sachinp@linux.ibm.com>
Tested-by: "Zhang, Qiang1" <qiang1.zhang@intel.com>
Tested-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
The current srcu_struct structure is on the order of 200 bytes in size
(depending on architecture and .config), which is much better than the
old-style 26K bytes, but still all too inconvenient when one is trying
to achieve good cache locality on a fastpath involving SRCU readers.
However, only a few fields in srcu_struct are used by SRCU readers.
The remaining fields could be offloaded to a new srcu_update
structure, thus shrinking the srcu_struct structure down to a few
tens of bytes. This commit begins this noble quest, a quest that is
complicated by open-coded initialization of the srcu_struct within the
srcu_notifier_head structure. This complication is addressed by updating
the srcu_notifier_head structure's open coding, given that there does
not appear to be a straightforward way of abstracting that initialization.
This commit moves only the ->node pointer to srcu_update. Later commits
will move additional fields.
[ paulmck: Fold in qiang1.zhang@intel.com's memory-leak fix. ]
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230320055751.4120251-1-qiang1.zhang@intel.com/
Suggested-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Cc: "Michał Mirosław" <mirq-linux@rere.qmqm.pl>
Cc: Dmitry Osipenko <dmitry.osipenko@collabora.com>
Tested-by: Sachin Sant <sachinp@linux.ibm.com>
Tested-by: "Zhang, Qiang1" <qiang1.zhang@intel.com>
Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Tested-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Further shrinking the srcu_struct structure is eased by requiring
that in-module srcu_struct structures rely more heavily on static
initialization. In particular, this preserves the property that
a module-load-time srcu_struct initialization can fail only due
to memory-allocation failure of the per-CPU srcu_data structures.
It might also slightly improve robustness by keeping the number of memory
allocations that must succeed down percpu_alloc() call.
This is in preparation for splitting an srcu_usage structure out
of the srcu_struct structure.
[ paulmck: Fold in qiang1.zhang@intel.com feedback. ]
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Tested-by: Sachin Sant <sachinp@linux.ibm.com>
Tested-by: "Zhang, Qiang1" <qiang1.zhang@intel.com>
Tested-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Although all flavors of RCU readers are annotated correctly with
lockdep as recursive read locks, they do not set the lock_acquire
'check' parameter. This means that RCU read locks are not added to
the lockdep dependency graph, which in turn means that lockdep cannot
detect RCU-based deadlocks. This is not a problem for RCU flavors having
atomic read-side critical sections because context-based annotations can
catch these deadlocks, see for example the RCU_LOCKDEP_WARN() statement
in synchronize_rcu(). But context-based annotations are not helpful
for sleepable RCU, especially given that it is perfectly legal to do
synchronize_srcu(&srcu1) within an srcu_read_lock(&srcu2).
However, we can detect SRCU-based by: (1) Making srcu_read_lock() a
'check'ed recursive read lock and (2) Making synchronize_srcu() a empty
write lock critical section. Even better, with the newly introduced
lock_sync(), we can avoid false positives about irq-unsafe/safe.
This commit therefore makes it so.
Note that NMI-safe SRCU read side critical sections are currently not
annotated, but might be annotated in the future.
Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
[ boqun: Add comments for annotation per Waiman's suggestion ]
[ boqun: Fix comment warning reported by Stephen Rothwell ]
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Because there is not guaranteed to be a full memory barrier between
the ->srcu_unlock_count increment of an srcu_read_unlock() and the
->srcu_lock_count increment of the next srcu_read_lock(), this next
srcu_read_lock() is not guaranteed to see the effect of the index flip
just prior to this comment. However, this next srcu_read_lock() will
execute a full memory barrier, so the srcu_read_lock() after that is
guaranteed to see that index flip.
This guarantee is illustrated by the following diagram of events and
the litmus test following that.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
READER UPDATER
------------- ----------
// idx is initially 0.
srcu_flip() {
smp_mb();
// RSCS
srcu_read_unlock() {
smp_mb();
idx++; // P
smp_mb(); // QQ
}
srcu_readers_unlock_idx(0) {
,--counted------------ count all unlock[0]; // Q
|
unlock[0]++; // X
}
smp_mb();
srcu_read_lock() {
READ(idx) = 0; ,---- count all lock[0]; // contributes imbalance of 1.
lock[0]++; ----counted |
smp_mb(); // PP } |
} |
|
// RSCS not going to effect above scan
|
srcu_read_unlock() { |
smp_mb(); |
unlock[0]++; |
} |
/
/
srcu_read_lock() { |
READ(idx); // Y -----cannot be counted because of P (has to sample idx as 1)
lock[1]++;
...
}
------------------------------------------------------------------------
This makes it similar to the store buffer pattern. Using X, Y, P and Q
annotated above, we get:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
READER UPDATER
X (write) P (write)
smp_mb(); //PP smp_mb(); //QQ
Y (read) Q (read)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
ASCII art courtesy of Joel Fernandes.
Reported-by: Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Reported-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Reported-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Reported-by: Neeraj Upadhyay <quic_neeraju@quicinc.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
