Oleg Nesterov 1333ab0315 ptrace: change __ptrace_unlink() to clear ->ptrace under ->siglock
This test-case (simplified version of generated by syzkaller)

	#include <unistd.h>
	#include <sys/ptrace.h>
	#include <sys/wait.h>

	void test(void)
	{
		for (;;) {
			if (fork()) {
				wait(NULL);
				continue;
			}

			ptrace(PTRACE_SEIZE, getppid(), 0, 0);
			ptrace(PTRACE_INTERRUPT, getppid(), 0, 0);
			_exit(0);
		}
	}

	int main(void)
	{
		int np;

		for (np = 0; np < 8; ++np)
			if (!fork())
				test();

		while (wait(NULL) > 0)
			;
		return 0;
	}

triggers the 2nd WARN_ON_ONCE(!signr) warning in do_jobctl_trap().  The
problem is that __ptrace_unlink() clears task->jobctl under siglock but
task->ptrace is cleared without this lock held; this fools the "else"
branch which assumes that !PT_SEIZED means PT_PTRACED.

Note also that most of other PTRACE_SEIZE checks can race with detach
from the exiting tracer too.  Say, the callers of ptrace_trap_notify()
assume that SEIZED can't go away after it was checked.

Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Reported-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: syzkaller <syzkaller@googlegroups.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-03-22 15:36:02 -07:00
..
2015-12-04 22:46:25 +01:00
2015-04-11 22:27:55 -04:00
2015-11-19 17:51:48 +01:00
2016-01-22 18:04:28 -05:00
2016-02-08 11:25:39 -05:00
2014-08-08 15:57:18 -07:00
2015-12-14 14:54:37 -05:00
2016-03-12 20:57:38 +01:00
2015-04-12 21:03:31 +02:00
2015-11-23 09:44:58 +01:00
2016-02-16 13:04:58 -05:00
2016-03-17 15:09:34 -07:00
2015-01-17 10:02:23 +13:00
2016-01-22 18:04:28 -05:00
2016-03-01 20:36:56 +01:00
2014-12-10 17:41:10 -08:00