mirror of
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git
synced 2025-01-01 10:42:11 +00:00
bf8f464ee2
kasan_record_aux_stack_noalloc() was introduced to record a stack trace
without allocating memory in the process. It has been added to callers
which were invoked while a raw_spinlock_t was held. More and more callers
were identified and changed over time. Is it a good thing to have this
while functions try their best to do a locklessly setup? The only
downside of having kasan_record_aux_stack() not allocate any memory is
that we end up without a stacktrace if stackdepot runs out of memory and
at the same stacktrace was not recorded before To quote Marco Elver from
https://lore.kernel.org/all/CANpmjNPmQYJ7pv1N3cuU8cP18u7PP_uoZD8YxwZd4jtbof9nVQ@mail.gmail.com/
| I'd be in favor, it simplifies things. And stack depot should be
| able to replenish its pool sufficiently in the "non-aux" cases
| i.e. regular allocations. Worst case we fail to record some
| aux stacks, but I think that's only really bad if there's a bug
| around one of these allocations. In general the probabilities
| of this being a regression are extremely small [...]
Make the kasan_record_aux_stack_noalloc() behaviour default as
kasan_record_aux_stack().
[bigeasy@linutronix.de: dressed the diff as patch]
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241122155451.Mb2pmeyJ@linutronix.de
Fixes:
|
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| Kconfig | ||
| Kconfig.debug | ||
| Makefile | ||
| rcu_segcblist.c | ||
| rcu_segcblist.h | ||
| rcu.h | ||
| rcuscale.c | ||
| rcutorture.c | ||
| refscale.c | ||
| srcutiny.c | ||
| srcutree.c | ||
| sync.c | ||
| tasks.h | ||
| tiny.c | ||
| tree_exp.h | ||
| tree_nocb.h | ||
| tree_plugin.h | ||
| tree_stall.h | ||
| tree.c | ||
| tree.h | ||
| update.c | ||