Thomas Gleixner 7cf7db8df0 signals: Fix more rcu assumptions
1) Remove the misleading comment in __sigqueue_alloc() which claims
   that holding a spinlock is equivalent to rcu_read_lock().

2) Add a rcu_read_lock/unlock around the __task_cred() access
   in __sigqueue_alloc()

This needs to be revisited to remove the remaining users of
read_lock(&tasklist_lock) but that's outside the scope of this patch.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
LKML-Reference: <20091210004703.269843657@linutronix.de>
2009-12-10 23:04:11 +01:00
..
2009-09-21 14:29:21 +02:00
2009-06-24 00:02:38 -04:00
2009-10-29 07:39:25 -07:00
2009-09-18 09:48:52 -07:00
2008-10-16 11:21:30 -07:00
2009-06-16 19:47:48 -07:00
2009-08-29 14:10:07 +02:00
2008-07-28 14:37:38 +02:00
2009-09-19 13:13:17 -07:00
2009-07-24 10:53:29 +02:00
2009-01-14 18:09:02 +01:00
2009-06-18 13:03:56 -07:00
2009-10-29 08:56:20 +10:30
2008-09-02 19:21:40 -07:00
2009-09-23 07:39:41 -07:00
2009-11-04 19:13:48 +01:00
2009-11-04 13:16:38 +01:00
2009-12-10 23:04:11 +01:00
2009-11-18 14:52:25 +01:00
2009-10-26 09:40:30 +01:00
2009-07-12 14:03:27 -07:00
2009-11-26 12:59:20 +01:00
2009-09-23 18:13:10 -07:00
2009-11-02 16:02:39 +01:00
2009-06-18 13:03:55 -07:00