Kernel/linux-stable
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git synced 2024-12-29 01:05:29 +00:00
Code Issues Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity
master
linux-stable/lib/util_macros_kunit.c

241 lines
10 KiB
C
Raw Permalink Normal View History

lib: util_macros_kunit: add kunit test for util_macros.h A bug was found in the find_closest() (find_closest_descending() is also affected after some testing), where for certain values with small progressions of 1, 2 & 3, the rounding (done by averaging 2 values) causes an incorrect index to be returned. The bug is described in more detail in the commit which fixes the bug. This commit adds a kunit test to validate that the fix works correctly. This kunit test adds some of the arrays (from the driver-sphere) that seem to produce issues with the 'find_closest()' macro. Specifically the one from ad7606 driver (with which the bug was found) and from the ina2xx drivers, which shows the quirk with 'find_closest()' with elements in a array that have an interval of 3. For the find_closest_descending() tests, the same arrays are used as for the find_closest(), but in reverse; the idea is that 'find_closest_descending()' should return the sames indices as 'find_closest()' but in reverse. For testing both macros, there are 4 special arrays created, one for testing find_closest{_descending}() for arrays of progressions 1, 2, 3 and 4. The idea is to show that (for progressions of 1, 2 & 3) the fix works as expected. When removing the fix, the issues should start to show up. Then an extra array of negative and positive values is added. There are currently no such arrays within drivers, but one could expect that these macros behave correctly even for such arrays. To run this kunit: ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run "*util_macros*" Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241105145406.554365-2-aardelean@baylibre.com Signed-off-by: Alexandru Ardelean <aardelean@baylibre.com> Cc: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2024-11-05 14:54:06 +00:00
// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+
/*
* Test cases for bitfield helpers.
*/
#define pr_fmt(fmt) KBUILD_MODNAME ": " fmt
#include <kunit/test.h>
#include <linux/util_macros.h>
#define FIND_CLOSEST_RANGE_CHECK(from, to, array, exp_idx) \
{ \
int i; \
for (i = from; i <= to; i++) { \
int found = find_closest(i, array, ARRAY_SIZE(array)); \
KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(ctx, exp_idx, found); \
} \
}
static void test_find_closest(struct kunit *ctx)
{
/* This will test a few arrays that are found in drivers */
static const int ina226_avg_tab[] = { 1, 4, 16, 64, 128, 256, 512, 1024 };
static const unsigned int ad7616_oversampling_avail[] = {
1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, 64, 128,
};
static u32 wd_timeout_table[] = { 2, 4, 6, 8, 16, 32, 48, 64 };
static int array_prog1a[] = { 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 };
static u32 array_prog1b[] = { 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 };
static int array_prog1mix[] = { -2, -1, 0, 1, 2 };
static int array_prog2a[] = { 1, 3, 5, 7 };
static u32 array_prog2b[] = { 2, 4, 6, 8 };
static int array_prog3a[] = { 1, 4, 7, 10 };
static u32 array_prog3b[] = { 2, 5, 8, 11 };
static int array_prog4a[] = { 1, 5, 9, 13 };
static u32 array_prog4b[] = { 2, 6, 10, 14 };
FIND_CLOSEST_RANGE_CHECK(-3, 2, ina226_avg_tab, 0);
FIND_CLOSEST_RANGE_CHECK(3, 10, ina226_avg_tab, 1);
FIND_CLOSEST_RANGE_CHECK(11, 40, ina226_avg_tab, 2);
FIND_CLOSEST_RANGE_CHECK(41, 96, ina226_avg_tab, 3);
FIND_CLOSEST_RANGE_CHECK(97, 192, ina226_avg_tab, 4);
FIND_CLOSEST_RANGE_CHECK(193, 384, ina226_avg_tab, 5);
FIND_CLOSEST_RANGE_CHECK(385, 768, ina226_avg_tab, 6);
FIND_CLOSEST_RANGE_CHECK(769, 2048, ina226_avg_tab, 7);
/* The array that found the bug that caused this kunit to exist */
FIND_CLOSEST_RANGE_CHECK(-3, 1, ad7616_oversampling_avail, 0);
FIND_CLOSEST_RANGE_CHECK(2, 3, ad7616_oversampling_avail, 1);
FIND_CLOSEST_RANGE_CHECK(4, 6, ad7616_oversampling_avail, 2);
FIND_CLOSEST_RANGE_CHECK(7, 12, ad7616_oversampling_avail, 3);
FIND_CLOSEST_RANGE_CHECK(13, 24, ad7616_oversampling_avail, 4);
FIND_CLOSEST_RANGE_CHECK(25, 48, ad7616_oversampling_avail, 5);
FIND_CLOSEST_RANGE_CHECK(49, 96, ad7616_oversampling_avail, 6);
FIND_CLOSEST_RANGE_CHECK(97, 256, ad7616_oversampling_avail, 7);
FIND_CLOSEST_RANGE_CHECK(-3, 3, wd_timeout_table, 0);
FIND_CLOSEST_RANGE_CHECK(4, 5, wd_timeout_table, 1);
FIND_CLOSEST_RANGE_CHECK(6, 7, wd_timeout_table, 2);
FIND_CLOSEST_RANGE_CHECK(8, 12, wd_timeout_table, 3);
FIND_CLOSEST_RANGE_CHECK(13, 24, wd_timeout_table, 4);
FIND_CLOSEST_RANGE_CHECK(25, 40, wd_timeout_table, 5);
FIND_CLOSEST_RANGE_CHECK(41, 56, wd_timeout_table, 6);
FIND_CLOSEST_RANGE_CHECK(57, 128, wd_timeout_table, 7);
/* One could argue that find_closest() should not be used for monotonic
* arrays (like 1,2,3,4,5), but even so, it should work as long as the
* array is sorted ascending. */
FIND_CLOSEST_RANGE_CHECK(-3, 1, array_prog1a, 0);
FIND_CLOSEST_RANGE_CHECK(2, 2, array_prog1a, 1);
FIND_CLOSEST_RANGE_CHECK(3, 3, array_prog1a, 2);
FIND_CLOSEST_RANGE_CHECK(4, 4, array_prog1a, 3);
FIND_CLOSEST_RANGE_CHECK(5, 8, array_prog1a, 4);
FIND_CLOSEST_RANGE_CHECK(-3, 2, array_prog1b, 0);
FIND_CLOSEST_RANGE_CHECK(3, 3, array_prog1b, 1);
FIND_CLOSEST_RANGE_CHECK(4, 4, array_prog1b, 2);
FIND_CLOSEST_RANGE_CHECK(5, 5, array_prog1b, 3);
FIND_CLOSEST_RANGE_CHECK(6, 8, array_prog1b, 4);
FIND_CLOSEST_RANGE_CHECK(-4, -2, array_prog1mix, 0);
FIND_CLOSEST_RANGE_CHECK(-1, -1, array_prog1mix, 1);
FIND_CLOSEST_RANGE_CHECK(0, 0, array_prog1mix, 2);
FIND_CLOSEST_RANGE_CHECK(1, 1, array_prog1mix, 3);
FIND_CLOSEST_RANGE_CHECK(2, 5, array_prog1mix, 4);
FIND_CLOSEST_RANGE_CHECK(-3, 2, array_prog2a, 0);
FIND_CLOSEST_RANGE_CHECK(3, 4, array_prog2a, 1);
FIND_CLOSEST_RANGE_CHECK(5, 6, array_prog2a, 2);
FIND_CLOSEST_RANGE_CHECK(7, 10, array_prog2a, 3);
FIND_CLOSEST_RANGE_CHECK(-3, 3, array_prog2b, 0);
FIND_CLOSEST_RANGE_CHECK(4, 5, array_prog2b, 1);
FIND_CLOSEST_RANGE_CHECK(6, 7, array_prog2b, 2);
FIND_CLOSEST_RANGE_CHECK(8, 10, array_prog2b, 3);
FIND_CLOSEST_RANGE_CHECK(-3, 2, array_prog3a, 0);
FIND_CLOSEST_RANGE_CHECK(3, 5, array_prog3a, 1);
FIND_CLOSEST_RANGE_CHECK(6, 8, array_prog3a, 2);
FIND_CLOSEST_RANGE_CHECK(9, 20, array_prog3a, 3);
FIND_CLOSEST_RANGE_CHECK(-3, 3, array_prog3b, 0);
FIND_CLOSEST_RANGE_CHECK(4, 6, array_prog3b, 1);
FIND_CLOSEST_RANGE_CHECK(7, 9, array_prog3b, 2);
FIND_CLOSEST_RANGE_CHECK(10, 20, array_prog3b, 3);
FIND_CLOSEST_RANGE_CHECK(-3, 3, array_prog4a, 0);
FIND_CLOSEST_RANGE_CHECK(4, 7, array_prog4a, 1);
FIND_CLOSEST_RANGE_CHECK(8, 11, array_prog4a, 2);
FIND_CLOSEST_RANGE_CHECK(12, 20, array_prog4a, 3);
FIND_CLOSEST_RANGE_CHECK(-3, 4, array_prog4b, 0);
FIND_CLOSEST_RANGE_CHECK(5, 8, array_prog4b, 1);
FIND_CLOSEST_RANGE_CHECK(9, 12, array_prog4b, 2);
FIND_CLOSEST_RANGE_CHECK(13, 20, array_prog4b, 3);
}
#define FIND_CLOSEST_DESC_RANGE_CHECK(from, to, array, exp_idx) \
{ \
int i; \
for (i = from; i <= to; i++) { \
int found = find_closest_descending(i, array, \
ARRAY_SIZE(array)); \
KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(ctx, exp_idx, found); \
} \
}
static void test_find_closest_descending(struct kunit *ctx)
{
/* Same arrays as 'test_find_closest' but reversed */
static const int ina226_avg_tab[] = { 1024, 512, 256, 128, 64, 16, 4, 1 };
static const unsigned int ad7616_oversampling_avail[] = {
128, 64, 32, 16, 8, 4, 2, 1
};
static u32 wd_timeout_table[] = { 64, 48, 32, 16, 8, 6, 4, 2 };
static int array_prog1a[] = { 5, 4, 3, 2, 1 };
static u32 array_prog1b[] = { 6, 5, 4, 3, 2 };
static int array_prog1mix[] = { 2, 1, 0, -1, -2 };
static int array_prog2a[] = { 7, 5, 3, 1 };
static u32 array_prog2b[] = { 8, 6, 4, 2 };
static int array_prog3a[] = { 10, 7, 4, 1 };
static u32 array_prog3b[] = { 11, 8, 5, 2 };
static int array_prog4a[] = { 13, 9, 5, 1 };
static u32 array_prog4b[] = { 14, 10, 6, 2 };
FIND_CLOSEST_DESC_RANGE_CHECK(-3, 2, ina226_avg_tab, 7);
FIND_CLOSEST_DESC_RANGE_CHECK(3, 10, ina226_avg_tab, 6);
FIND_CLOSEST_DESC_RANGE_CHECK(11, 40, ina226_avg_tab, 5);
FIND_CLOSEST_DESC_RANGE_CHECK(41, 96, ina226_avg_tab, 4);
FIND_CLOSEST_DESC_RANGE_CHECK(97, 192, ina226_avg_tab, 3);
FIND_CLOSEST_DESC_RANGE_CHECK(193, 384, ina226_avg_tab, 2);
FIND_CLOSEST_DESC_RANGE_CHECK(385, 768, ina226_avg_tab, 1);
FIND_CLOSEST_DESC_RANGE_CHECK(769, 2048, ina226_avg_tab, 0);
FIND_CLOSEST_DESC_RANGE_CHECK(-3, 1, ad7616_oversampling_avail, 7);
FIND_CLOSEST_DESC_RANGE_CHECK(2, 3, ad7616_oversampling_avail, 6);
FIND_CLOSEST_DESC_RANGE_CHECK(4, 6, ad7616_oversampling_avail, 5);
FIND_CLOSEST_DESC_RANGE_CHECK(7, 12, ad7616_oversampling_avail, 4);
FIND_CLOSEST_DESC_RANGE_CHECK(13, 24, ad7616_oversampling_avail, 3);
FIND_CLOSEST_DESC_RANGE_CHECK(25, 48, ad7616_oversampling_avail, 2);
FIND_CLOSEST_DESC_RANGE_CHECK(49, 96, ad7616_oversampling_avail, 1);
FIND_CLOSEST_DESC_RANGE_CHECK(97, 256, ad7616_oversampling_avail, 0);
FIND_CLOSEST_DESC_RANGE_CHECK(-3, 3, wd_timeout_table, 7);
FIND_CLOSEST_DESC_RANGE_CHECK(4, 5, wd_timeout_table, 6);
FIND_CLOSEST_DESC_RANGE_CHECK(6, 7, wd_timeout_table, 5);
FIND_CLOSEST_DESC_RANGE_CHECK(8, 12, wd_timeout_table, 4);
FIND_CLOSEST_DESC_RANGE_CHECK(13, 24, wd_timeout_table, 3);
FIND_CLOSEST_DESC_RANGE_CHECK(25, 40, wd_timeout_table, 2);
FIND_CLOSEST_DESC_RANGE_CHECK(41, 56, wd_timeout_table, 1);
FIND_CLOSEST_DESC_RANGE_CHECK(57, 128, wd_timeout_table, 0);
/* One could argue that find_closest_descending() should not be used
* for monotonic arrays (like 5,4,3,2,1), but even so, it should still
* it should work as long as the array is sorted descending. */
FIND_CLOSEST_DESC_RANGE_CHECK(-3, 1, array_prog1a, 4);
FIND_CLOSEST_DESC_RANGE_CHECK(2, 2, array_prog1a, 3);
FIND_CLOSEST_DESC_RANGE_CHECK(3, 3, array_prog1a, 2);
FIND_CLOSEST_DESC_RANGE_CHECK(4, 4, array_prog1a, 1);
FIND_CLOSEST_DESC_RANGE_CHECK(5, 8, array_prog1a, 0);
FIND_CLOSEST_DESC_RANGE_CHECK(-3, 2, array_prog1b, 4);
FIND_CLOSEST_DESC_RANGE_CHECK(3, 3, array_prog1b, 3);
FIND_CLOSEST_DESC_RANGE_CHECK(4, 4, array_prog1b, 2);
FIND_CLOSEST_DESC_RANGE_CHECK(5, 5, array_prog1b, 1);
FIND_CLOSEST_DESC_RANGE_CHECK(6, 8, array_prog1b, 0);
FIND_CLOSEST_DESC_RANGE_CHECK(-4, -2, array_prog1mix, 4);
FIND_CLOSEST_DESC_RANGE_CHECK(-1, -1, array_prog1mix, 3);
FIND_CLOSEST_DESC_RANGE_CHECK(0, 0, array_prog1mix, 2);
FIND_CLOSEST_DESC_RANGE_CHECK(1, 1, array_prog1mix, 1);
FIND_CLOSEST_DESC_RANGE_CHECK(2, 5, array_prog1mix, 0);
FIND_CLOSEST_DESC_RANGE_CHECK(-3, 2, array_prog2a, 3);
FIND_CLOSEST_DESC_RANGE_CHECK(3, 4, array_prog2a, 2);
FIND_CLOSEST_DESC_RANGE_CHECK(5, 6, array_prog2a, 1);
FIND_CLOSEST_DESC_RANGE_CHECK(7, 10, array_prog2a, 0);
FIND_CLOSEST_DESC_RANGE_CHECK(-3, 3, array_prog2b, 3);
FIND_CLOSEST_DESC_RANGE_CHECK(4, 5, array_prog2b, 2);
FIND_CLOSEST_DESC_RANGE_CHECK(6, 7, array_prog2b, 1);
FIND_CLOSEST_DESC_RANGE_CHECK(8, 10, array_prog2b, 0);
FIND_CLOSEST_DESC_RANGE_CHECK(-3, 2, array_prog3a, 3);
FIND_CLOSEST_DESC_RANGE_CHECK(3, 5, array_prog3a, 2);
FIND_CLOSEST_DESC_RANGE_CHECK(6, 8, array_prog3a, 1);
FIND_CLOSEST_DESC_RANGE_CHECK(9, 20, array_prog3a, 0);
FIND_CLOSEST_DESC_RANGE_CHECK(-3, 3, array_prog3b, 3);
FIND_CLOSEST_DESC_RANGE_CHECK(4, 6, array_prog3b, 2);
FIND_CLOSEST_DESC_RANGE_CHECK(7, 9, array_prog3b, 1);
FIND_CLOSEST_DESC_RANGE_CHECK(10, 20, array_prog3b, 0);
FIND_CLOSEST_DESC_RANGE_CHECK(-3, 3, array_prog4a, 3);
FIND_CLOSEST_DESC_RANGE_CHECK(4, 7, array_prog4a, 2);
FIND_CLOSEST_DESC_RANGE_CHECK(8, 11, array_prog4a, 1);
FIND_CLOSEST_DESC_RANGE_CHECK(12, 20, array_prog4a, 0);
FIND_CLOSEST_DESC_RANGE_CHECK(-3, 4, array_prog4b, 3);
FIND_CLOSEST_DESC_RANGE_CHECK(5, 8, array_prog4b, 2);
FIND_CLOSEST_DESC_RANGE_CHECK(9, 12, array_prog4b, 1);
FIND_CLOSEST_DESC_RANGE_CHECK(13, 20, array_prog4b, 0);
}
static struct kunit_case __refdata util_macros_test_cases[] = {
KUNIT_CASE(test_find_closest),
KUNIT_CASE(test_find_closest_descending),
{}
};
static struct kunit_suite util_macros_test_suite = {
.name = "util_macros.h",
.test_cases = util_macros_test_cases,
};
kunit_test_suites(&util_macros_test_suite);
MODULE_AUTHOR("Alexandru Ardelean <aardelean@baylibre.com>");
MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Test cases for util_macros.h helpers");
MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
Reference in New Issue Copy Permalink