mirror of
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git
synced 2025-01-06 13:16:22 +00:00
net: phylink: simplify how SFP PHYs are attached
There are a few issues with how SFP PHYs are attached: a) The phylink_sfp_connect_phy() and phylink_sfp_config_phy() code validates the configuration three times: 1. To discover the support/advertising masks that the PHY/PCS/MAC can support in order to select an interface. 2. To validate the selected interface. 3. When the PHY is brought up after being attached, another validation is done. This is needlessly complex. b) The configuration is set prior to the PHY being attached, which means we don't have the PHY available in phylink_major_config() for phylink_pcs_neg_mode() to make decisions upon. We have already added an extra step to validate the selected interface, so we can now move the attachment and bringup of the PHY earlier, inside phylink_sfp_config_phy(). This results in the validation at step 2 above becoming entirely unnecessary, so remove that too. Reviewed-by: Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com> Tested-by: Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com> Signed-off-by: Russell King (Oracle) <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/E1t3bcb-000c8H-3e@rmk-PC.armlinux.org.uk Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
41caa7e81b
commit
25391e82ff
@ -3224,10 +3224,8 @@ static void phylink_sfp_set_config(struct phylink *pl, u8 mode,
|
||||
static int phylink_sfp_config_phy(struct phylink *pl, u8 mode,
|
||||
struct phy_device *phy)
|
||||
{
|
||||
__ETHTOOL_DECLARE_LINK_MODE_MASK(support1);
|
||||
__ETHTOOL_DECLARE_LINK_MODE_MASK(support);
|
||||
struct phylink_link_state config;
|
||||
phy_interface_t iface;
|
||||
int ret;
|
||||
|
||||
linkmode_copy(support, phy->supported);
|
||||
@ -3248,20 +3246,21 @@ static int phylink_sfp_config_phy(struct phylink *pl, u8 mode,
|
||||
return ret;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
iface = phylink_sfp_select_interface(pl, config.advertising);
|
||||
if (iface == PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_NA)
|
||||
config.interface = phylink_sfp_select_interface(pl, config.advertising);
|
||||
if (config.interface == PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_NA)
|
||||
return -EINVAL;
|
||||
|
||||
config.interface = iface;
|
||||
linkmode_copy(support1, support);
|
||||
ret = phylink_validate(pl, support1, &config);
|
||||
if (ret) {
|
||||
phylink_err(pl,
|
||||
"validation of %s/%s with support %*pb failed: %pe\n",
|
||||
phylink_an_mode_str(mode),
|
||||
phy_modes(config.interface),
|
||||
__ETHTOOL_LINK_MODE_MASK_NBITS, support,
|
||||
ERR_PTR(ret));
|
||||
/* Attach the PHY so that the PHY is present when we do the major
|
||||
* configuration step.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
ret = phylink_attach_phy(pl, phy, config.interface);
|
||||
if (ret < 0)
|
||||
return ret;
|
||||
|
||||
/* This will validate the configuration for us. */
|
||||
ret = phylink_bringup_phy(pl, phy, config.interface);
|
||||
if (ret < 0) {
|
||||
phy_detach(phy);
|
||||
return ret;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@ -3419,9 +3418,7 @@ static bool phylink_phy_no_inband(struct phy_device *phy)
|
||||
static int phylink_sfp_connect_phy(void *upstream, struct phy_device *phy)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct phylink *pl = upstream;
|
||||
phy_interface_t interface;
|
||||
u8 mode;
|
||||
int ret;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* This is the new way of dealing with flow control for PHYs,
|
||||
@ -3442,20 +3439,7 @@ static int phylink_sfp_connect_phy(void *upstream, struct phy_device *phy)
|
||||
pl->config->supported_interfaces);
|
||||
|
||||
/* Do the initial configuration */
|
||||
ret = phylink_sfp_config_phy(pl, mode, phy);
|
||||
if (ret < 0)
|
||||
return ret;
|
||||
|
||||
interface = pl->link_config.interface;
|
||||
ret = phylink_attach_phy(pl, phy, interface);
|
||||
if (ret < 0)
|
||||
return ret;
|
||||
|
||||
ret = phylink_bringup_phy(pl, phy, interface);
|
||||
if (ret)
|
||||
phy_detach(phy);
|
||||
|
||||
return ret;
|
||||
return phylink_sfp_config_phy(pl, mode, phy);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static void phylink_sfp_disconnect_phy(void *upstream,
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user