mirror of
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git
synced 2024-12-29 17:25:38 +00:00
blk-crypto: use dynamic lock class for blk_crypto_profile::lock
[ Upstream commit2fb48d88e7
] When a device-mapper device is passing through the inline encryption support of an underlying device, calls to blk_crypto_evict_key() take the blk_crypto_profile::lock of the device-mapper device, then take the blk_crypto_profile::lock of the underlying device (nested). This isn't a real deadlock, but it causes a lockdep report because there is only one lock class for all instances of this lock. Lockdep subclasses don't really work here because the hierarchy of block devices is dynamic and could have more than 2 levels. Instead, register a dynamic lock class for each blk_crypto_profile, and associate that with the lock. This avoids false-positive lockdep reports like the following: ============================================ WARNING: possible recursive locking detected 6.4.0-rc5 #2 Not tainted -------------------------------------------- fscryptctl/1421 is trying to acquire lock: ffffff80829ca418 (&profile->lock){++++}-{3:3}, at: __blk_crypto_evict_key+0x44/0x1c0 but task is already holding lock: ffffff8086b68ca8 (&profile->lock){++++}-{3:3}, at: __blk_crypto_evict_key+0xc8/0x1c0 other info that might help us debug this: Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 ---- lock(&profile->lock); lock(&profile->lock); *** DEADLOCK *** May be due to missing lock nesting notation Fixes:1b26283970
("block: Keyslot Manager for Inline Encryption") Reported-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org> Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230610061139.212085-1-ebiggers@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
d752be635b
commit
49f6ac6f1c
@ -79,7 +79,14 @@ int blk_crypto_profile_init(struct blk_crypto_profile *profile,
|
||||
unsigned int slot_hashtable_size;
|
||||
|
||||
memset(profile, 0, sizeof(*profile));
|
||||
init_rwsem(&profile->lock);
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* profile->lock of an underlying device can nest inside profile->lock
|
||||
* of a device-mapper device, so use a dynamic lock class to avoid
|
||||
* false-positive lockdep reports.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
lockdep_register_key(&profile->lockdep_key);
|
||||
__init_rwsem(&profile->lock, "&profile->lock", &profile->lockdep_key);
|
||||
|
||||
if (num_slots == 0)
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
@ -89,7 +96,7 @@ int blk_crypto_profile_init(struct blk_crypto_profile *profile,
|
||||
profile->slots = kvcalloc(num_slots, sizeof(profile->slots[0]),
|
||||
GFP_KERNEL);
|
||||
if (!profile->slots)
|
||||
return -ENOMEM;
|
||||
goto err_destroy;
|
||||
|
||||
profile->num_slots = num_slots;
|
||||
|
||||
@ -441,6 +448,7 @@ void blk_crypto_profile_destroy(struct blk_crypto_profile *profile)
|
||||
{
|
||||
if (!profile)
|
||||
return;
|
||||
lockdep_unregister_key(&profile->lockdep_key);
|
||||
kvfree(profile->slot_hashtable);
|
||||
kvfree_sensitive(profile->slots,
|
||||
sizeof(profile->slots[0]) * profile->num_slots);
|
||||
|
@ -111,6 +111,7 @@ struct blk_crypto_profile {
|
||||
* keyslots while ensuring that they can't be changed concurrently.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
struct rw_semaphore lock;
|
||||
struct lock_class_key lockdep_key;
|
||||
|
||||
/* List of idle slots, with least recently used slot at front */
|
||||
wait_queue_head_t idle_slots_wait_queue;
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user