mirror of
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git
synced 2024-12-28 16:56:26 +00:00
remoteproc: core: Move state checking to remoteproc_core
There is no mutex protection of these state checking for 'stop' and 'detach' which can't guarantee there is no another instance is trying to do same operation. Consider two instances case: Instance1: echo stop > /sys/class/remoteproc/remoteproc0/state Instance2: echo stop > /sys/class/remoteproc/remoteproc0/state The issue is that the instance2 case may success, Or it may fail with -EINVAL, which is uncertain. So move this state checking in rproc_cdev_write() and state_store() for 'stop', 'detach' operation to 'rproc_shutdown' , 'rproc_detach' function under the mutex protection. Signed-off-by: Shengjiu Wang <shengjiu.wang@nxp.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1648434012-16655-3-git-send-email-shengjiu.wang@nxp.com Signed-off-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
8f454f950d
commit
5e6a0e0527
@ -34,15 +34,8 @@ static ssize_t rproc_cdev_write(struct file *filp, const char __user *buf, size_
|
||||
if (!strncmp(cmd, "start", len)) {
|
||||
ret = rproc_boot(rproc);
|
||||
} else if (!strncmp(cmd, "stop", len)) {
|
||||
if (rproc->state != RPROC_RUNNING &&
|
||||
rproc->state != RPROC_ATTACHED)
|
||||
return -EINVAL;
|
||||
|
||||
ret = rproc_shutdown(rproc);
|
||||
} else if (!strncmp(cmd, "detach", len)) {
|
||||
if (rproc->state != RPROC_ATTACHED)
|
||||
return -EINVAL;
|
||||
|
||||
ret = rproc_detach(rproc);
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
dev_err(&rproc->dev, "Unrecognized option\n");
|
||||
|
@ -2071,6 +2071,12 @@ int rproc_shutdown(struct rproc *rproc)
|
||||
return ret;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (rproc->state != RPROC_RUNNING &&
|
||||
rproc->state != RPROC_ATTACHED) {
|
||||
ret = -EINVAL;
|
||||
goto out;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* if the remote proc is still needed, bail out */
|
||||
if (!atomic_dec_and_test(&rproc->power))
|
||||
goto out;
|
||||
@ -2130,6 +2136,11 @@ int rproc_detach(struct rproc *rproc)
|
||||
return ret;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (rproc->state != RPROC_ATTACHED) {
|
||||
ret = -EINVAL;
|
||||
goto out;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* if the remote proc is still needed, bail out */
|
||||
if (!atomic_dec_and_test(&rproc->power)) {
|
||||
ret = 0;
|
||||
|
@ -198,15 +198,8 @@ static ssize_t state_store(struct device *dev,
|
||||
if (ret)
|
||||
dev_err(&rproc->dev, "Boot failed: %d\n", ret);
|
||||
} else if (sysfs_streq(buf, "stop")) {
|
||||
if (rproc->state != RPROC_RUNNING &&
|
||||
rproc->state != RPROC_ATTACHED)
|
||||
return -EINVAL;
|
||||
|
||||
ret = rproc_shutdown(rproc);
|
||||
} else if (sysfs_streq(buf, "detach")) {
|
||||
if (rproc->state != RPROC_ATTACHED)
|
||||
return -EINVAL;
|
||||
|
||||
ret = rproc_detach(rproc);
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
dev_err(&rproc->dev, "Unrecognised option: %s\n", buf);
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user