mirror of
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git
synced 2025-01-06 13:16:22 +00:00
cpufreq: Change order of online() CB and policy->cpus modification
From a state where all policy->related_cpus are offline, putting one of the policy's CPU back online re-activates the policy by: 1. Calling cpufreq_driver->online() 2. Setting the CPU in policy->cpus qcom_cpufreq_hw_cpu_online() makes use of policy->cpus. Thus 1. and 2. should be inverted to avoid having a policy->cpus empty. The qcom-cpufreq-hw is the only driver affected by this. Signed-off-by: Pierre Gondois <pierre.gondois@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
f2b03dffa6
commit
68315f1a5f
@ -1350,15 +1350,15 @@ static int cpufreq_online(unsigned int cpu)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (!new_policy && cpufreq_driver->online) {
|
||||
/* Recover policy->cpus using related_cpus */
|
||||
cpumask_copy(policy->cpus, policy->related_cpus);
|
||||
|
||||
ret = cpufreq_driver->online(policy);
|
||||
if (ret) {
|
||||
pr_debug("%s: %d: initialization failed\n", __func__,
|
||||
__LINE__);
|
||||
goto out_exit_policy;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* Recover policy->cpus using related_cpus */
|
||||
cpumask_copy(policy->cpus, policy->related_cpus);
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
cpumask_copy(policy->cpus, cpumask_of(cpu));
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user