powerpc/xive: Use cpumask_intersects()

Replace `cpumask_any_and(a, b) >= nr_cpu_ids`
with the more readable `!cpumask_intersects(a, b)`.

Comparison between cpumask_any_and() and cpumask_intersects()

The cpumask_any_and() function expands using FIND_FIRST_BIT(),
resulting in a loop that iterates through each bit of the bitmask:

for (idx = 0; idx * BITS_PER_LONG < sz; idx++) {
	val = (FETCH);
	if (val) {
		sz = min(idx * BITS_PER_LONG + __ffs(MUNGE(val)), sz);
		break;
	}
}

The cpumask_intersects() function expands using __bitmap_intersects(),
resulting in that the first loop iterates through each long word of the bitmask,
and the second through each bit within a long word:

unsigned int k, lim = bits/BITS_PER_LONG;
for (k = 0; k < lim; ++k)
	if (bitmap1[k] & bitmap2[k])
		return true;

if (bits % BITS_PER_LONG)
	if ((bitmap1[k] & bitmap2[k]) & BITMAP_LAST_WORD_MASK(bits))
		return true;

Conclusion: cpumask_intersects() is at least as efficient as cpumask_any_and(),
if not more so, as it typically performs fewer loops and comparisons.

Signed-off-by: Costa Shulyupin <costa.shul@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20240926092623.399577-2-costa.shul@redhat.com
This commit is contained in:
Costa Shulyupin 2024-09-26 12:26:22 +03:00 committed by Michael Ellerman
parent 7ca93aa920
commit 6da1cab4f5

View File

@ -726,7 +726,7 @@ static int xive_irq_set_affinity(struct irq_data *d,
pr_debug("%s: irq %d/0x%x\n", __func__, d->irq, hw_irq);
/* Is this valid ? */
if (cpumask_any_and(cpumask, cpu_online_mask) >= nr_cpu_ids)
if (!cpumask_intersects(cpumask, cpu_online_mask))
return -EINVAL;
/*