mirror of
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git
synced 2024-12-29 17:25:38 +00:00
ipmi:ssif: Improve detecting during probing
If an IPMI SSIF device is probed and there is something there, but probably not an actual BMC, the code would just issue a lot of errors before it failed. We kind of need these errors to help with certain issues, and some of the failure reports are non-fatal. However, a get device id command should alway work. If that fails, nothing else is going to work and it's a pretty good indication that there's no valid BMC there. So issue and check that command and bail if it fails. Reported-by: Ivan T. Ivanov <iivanov@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Corey Minyard <corey@minyard.net>
This commit is contained in:
parent
0e38f7ecb5
commit
88f65f903d
@ -1368,8 +1368,20 @@ static int ssif_detect(struct i2c_client *client, struct i2c_board_info *info)
|
||||
rv = do_cmd(client, 2, msg, &len, resp);
|
||||
if (rv)
|
||||
rv = -ENODEV;
|
||||
else
|
||||
else {
|
||||
if (len < 3) {
|
||||
rv = -ENODEV;
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
struct ipmi_device_id id;
|
||||
|
||||
rv = ipmi_demangle_device_id(resp[0] >> 2, resp[1],
|
||||
resp + 2, len - 2, &id);
|
||||
if (rv)
|
||||
rv = -ENODEV; /* Error means a BMC probably isn't there. */
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (!rv && info)
|
||||
strscpy(info->type, DEVICE_NAME, I2C_NAME_SIZE);
|
||||
}
|
||||
kfree(resp);
|
||||
return rv;
|
||||
}
|
||||
@ -1704,6 +1716,16 @@ static int ssif_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
|
||||
ipmi_addr_src_to_str(ssif_info->addr_source),
|
||||
client->addr, client->adapter->name, slave_addr);
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Send a get device id command and validate its response to
|
||||
* make sure a valid BMC is there.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
rv = ssif_detect(client, NULL);
|
||||
if (rv) {
|
||||
dev_err(&client->dev, "Not present\n");
|
||||
goto out;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* Now check for system interface capabilities */
|
||||
msg[0] = IPMI_NETFN_APP_REQUEST << 2;
|
||||
msg[1] = IPMI_GET_SYSTEM_INTERFACE_CAPABILITIES_CMD;
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user